System, method, and computer program product for optimization and acceleration of data transport and processing
A system, method, and computer program product for optimization and acceleration of data transport and processing in a communication system or computer network. The system comprises one or more client devices each running a client application module, one or more communication server modules, a launcher module, and a controller module for initiating system modules, allocating system resources, and monitoring system operation. The system also includes a management console module for performing administrative functions of the system. The client device and communication server module are adapted to communicate through wired and wireless means in a computer network or communications system. A client application module is the means through which data, such as data to be stored in a database system or data representing a data retrieval request from a database system, is translated from its original format into an accelerated transport protocol (ATP) format for optimized and accelerated transport to a communication server module. A client application module also receives reply data from a communication server module and translates the received data from ATP format back to its original format. A communication server module performs the functions of receiving client transaction request data from a client application and sending reply data to a client application. A communication server module also performs the functions of translating the data received from a client application from ATP format back to its original format, and translating data to be sent to a client application into ATP format. The controller module is responsible for creating the interface between the communication server modules and the launcher module, which involves the creation of processing queues. The launcher module manages the processing of client transactions by launching and controlling agents that process the client transactions by retrieving data from processing queues and processing the transactions. Results data from an agent after processing of a transaction is sent to the processing queue for transport to a client application.
Latest ABLESOFT, INC. Patents:
This application claims the benefit of the earlier filing dates of, and contains subject matter related to that disclosed in: (1) U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/231,802, filed Sep. 11, 2000; and (2) U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/275,154, filed Mar. 12, 2001, each having common inventorship, the entire contents of each being incorporated herein by reference.
COPYRIGHT NOTIFICATIONPortions of this patent application contain materials that are subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document, or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates, generally, to computer networks and communication systems and, more particularly, to the transport and processing of data in computer networks and communication systems.
2. Discussion of the Background
The explosion in the use of wired and wireless computer networks and communication systems in almost every aspect of day-to-day business operations and personal life has created an insatiable and, indeed, necessary demand for increased speed, reliability, and security in the transmission and processing of data in computer networks and communication systems. Computer networks and communication systems must enable the applications and users utilizing those networks and systems to transport and process data with the speed and, more particularly, end-to-end response times, reliability, and security which are, in most cases, critical to acceptable system, application, and user operation. Moreover, the increased functionality and robustness of today's systems and applications, and continued demand for additional features and functionality, as well as the lack of uniform standards adopted and implemented by the divergent devices, applications, systems, and components communicating in operation of such systems and applications have led to significant deterioration in these critical performance factors—i.e., speed/end-to-end response times, reliability, and security.
Most conventional approaches directed to increasing data transmission and processing speeds, and the reliability and security of such transmissions and processing, have focused on hardware solutions, such as deploying faster processors (i.e., CPUs) and increasing bandwidth by upgrading transport media and associated transmission hardware. The evolution of these attempted solutions to address the transmission and processing performance problems can be traced through the developing standards associated with going from 300 baud dialup modems up through the 56000 baud dialup modems, as well as through the evolution of routers/switches moving from 10 MB up to 1 GB throughput. Processor speeds have also ranged from the original 4.77 MHz up through 1.5 GHz. Such solutions, however, have inherent limitations in the performance increases possible. Most notably, the typical “bottlenecks” leading to limitations in data transport and processing speeds in computer networks and communication systems are not the hardware being utilized, but the software and, more particularly, the software architecture driving the transport and processing of data from end point to end point.
Traditional transport software implementations suffer from design flaws, lack of standardization and compatibility across platforms, networks, and systems, as well as the utilization and transport of unnecessary overhead, such as control data and communication protocol layers. These drawbacks are due, in large part, to a lack of industry agreement on a universal protocol or language to be used in the overall process of transporting data between a message source and a message destination. With reference to
As a consequence of this lack of a universal protocol or language, numerous and varying protocols and languages have been, and continue to be, adopted and used resulting in significant additional overhead, complexity, and a lack of standardization and compatibility across platforms, networks, and systems. Moreover, this diversity in protocols and languages, and lack of a universal language beyond the transport layer, forces the actual data being transported to be saddled with significant additional data to allow for translation as transmission of the data occurs through these various layers in the communication stack. The use of these numerous and varying protocols and languages such as, for example, HTTP, WAP/WTP/WSP, XML, WML, HTML/SMTP/POP, COM, ADO, HL7, EDI, SOAP, JAVA, JDBC, ODBC, OLE/DB, create and, indeed, require additional layers and additional data for translation and control, adding additional overhead on top of the actual data being transported and complicating system design, deployment, operation, maintenance, and modification.
These deficiencies in such traditional implementations lead to the inefficient utilization of available bandwidth and available processing capacity, and result in unsatisfactory response times. Even a significant upgrade in hardware—e.g., processor power and speed, or transport media and associated hardware—will provide little, if any, increase in system performance from the standpoint of transport speed and processing of data, end-to-end response time, system reliability and security.
With the explosion in the use of web-based protocols, yet another major deficiency has emerged in current implementations as a result of the combination of both transport/communication state processing and application/presentation state processing. Many of the protocols, such as XML and SOAP, promote the merging of these two fundamentally opposite technologies. This merging has the effect of increasing transport and application complexity in both the amount of handshaking and the amount of additional protocol data that is required. As computer networks and communication systems continue to grow, with the addition of more devices, applications, interfaces, components, and systems, the transport and application complexities caused by merging transport/communication state processing and application/presentation state processing will grow to the point that all network and system resources will be exhausted.
Another challenge for the current momentum of the industry is adopting functionality to the emerging wireless communications industry. The wireless devices used for this industry are small, with limited CPU capacity and limited onboard resources. The wireless bandwidth currently available to these devices is also very limited and can be of an unstable variety in which the signal is fluctuating. The current average speed of the following technologies are noted: CDPD Modem=19.2 kb/sec; RF wireless LAN=11 mb/sec. The industry's future expansion cannot rely on software technologies that exhibit major inefficiency in either processing or bandwidth. An example of this is in the wireless industry's unsuccessful adoption of web-based technologies. These include, for example, business-to-consumer and business-to-business information and transaction processing (e-commerce). Early software projects in the wireless industry are producing unacceptable results and a very low level of customer satisfaction. This is due to the fact that these technologies are currently having functional performance problems because of their higher bandwidth and substantially higher CPU requirements. The use of these wireless solutions for internal business functions has been limited due, in large part, to an absence of cost effective, real time wireless applications that function with 100% security and reliability. The momentum of the wireless industry is failing to penetrate most of these markets.
Another challenge for the current momentum of the industry is adopting functionality to legacy or mainframe systems. Most primary internal business functions are currently performed using proprietary application software that runs on these legacy systems. These systems are, in many cases, based on older style architectures that were designed to efficiently use the limited bandwidth and onboard computer resources that were present when technologies were first developed. Many of the current development efforts in applying these inefficient technologies, such as web-based, into technologies that require high efficiency are producing systems that do not provide adequate reliability or security for performing business critical functions. These systems are not fast enough to perform functions in real time as they add additional layers of processing that complicate and slow down the business functions. Therefore, organizations are reluctant to apply these technologies to their mission critical internal business functions.
Another approach taken in an effort to address the system performance deficiencies described above involves a change in fundamental system architecture from a two-tier client/server configuration to a three-tier client/server configuration. Three-tier client/server applications are rapidly displacing traditional two-tier applications, especially in large-scale systems involving complex distributed transactions. In two-tier systems, the client always handles data presentation, and the server manages the database system. The primary problem with the two-tier configuration is that the modules of the system that represent the business logic by applying, for example, business rules, data validation, and other business semantics to the data (i.e., business services) must be implemented on either the client or the server. When the server implements these modules that represent the business logic (i.e., business services, such as business rules, by using stored procedures), it can become overloaded by having to process both database requests and, for example, the business rules. However, if the client implements the business rules, the architecture can easily grow into the monolithic application reminiscent of the mainframe days.
The three-tier client/server architecture provides an additional separation of the business logic from the database and the actual presentation.
In a traditional three-tier architecture, a framework of services, sometimes referred to as middleware, are provided that enable the separation of the business logic from the database and the actual presentation. This middleware is software that sits between the business applications and the hardware and operating systems. Middleware, such as, for example Microsoft Corporation's Microsoft Transaction Server (MTS), provides a host of functionality that simplifies the creation, deployment, operation, and maintenance of large-scale client-server systems. Some of the services provided and functions performed by middleware, such as MTS, are as follows:
-
- client access to heterogeneous, distributed data stores (i.e., access to data contained in, for example, legacy systems, desktops, and servers), and control and management of access to distributed data through distributed transactions;
- coordinating concurrency between multiple simultaneous users, communication between all subsystems from the database to the client application;
- coordinating and monitoring the transactional state of components as they interact with various transactional systems, such as databases;
- acknowledging requests for object creation from remote clients and coordinating the creation, maintenance, and destruction of COM component instances and the threads that execute inside them;
- optimizing use of server resources, such as threads, objects, processes, and database connections, by creating a pool of resources and sharing them with multiple clients;
- controlling access to components at runtime;
- enabling efficient changing of client/server configuration during and after deployment, without the need to change system code;
- insulating the applications from unique hardware and operating system interfaces. This approach improves the application's reusability and helps attain platform independence (at lease on the server side).
Referring to
However, while adoption of a three-tiered client/server architecture and ability to utilize middleware providing the additional services and functionality described above represented a major advance in increasing system efficiency from the standpoint of system creation, deployment, operation, and maintenance, neither the architecture nor the middleware provide any services or functionality directed to accelerating data transport and processing (i.e., decreasing end-to-end response time), and improving the reliability and security of data transport. Such systems, designed using a three-tiered architecture and implemented using middleware such as MTS, still suffer from the limitations and drawbacks associated with the software driving the transport and processing of data from end point to end point—i.e., design flaws, increased complexity, lack of standardization and compatibility across platforms, networks, and systems, as well as the utilization and transport of unnecessary overhead, such as control data and communication protocol layers, as discussed above.
Thus, notwithstanding the available hardware solutions, transport software implementations, architectures, and middleware, there is a need for a system, method, and computer program product that provides increased speed, reliability, and security in the transmission and processing of data in computer networks and communication systems. Further, there is a need for a system, method, and computer program product that provides such increased speed, reliability, and security, (1) that can optimize and accelerate data transport and processing, (2) that can more efficiently utilize existing bandwidth in communications systems and computer networks, (3) that is highly scalable, extensible, and flexible, (4) that can seamlessly integrate with any hardware platform, operating system, and any desktop and enterprise application, and (5) that can be implemented on any wired or wireless communication medium.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe primary object of the present invention is to overcome the deficiencies of the prior art described above by providing a system, method, and computer program product that can optimize and accelerate the transmission and processing of data in communication systems, computer networks, and the applications utilizing those systems and networks.
Another key object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that can more efficiently utilize existing bandwidth in communication systems and computer networks.
Still another key object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that can reduce the amount of data required to be transmitted in communication systems and computer networks in order to process transactions.
Yet another key object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that can substantially increase the performance and the end-to-end response time in communication systems, computer networks, and the applications that utilize those systems and networks.
Still another key object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that allows for the complete separation of communication/transport state processing and application/presentation state processing, enabling a significant increase in system performance and reliability for all data transmission and processing operations, a reduction in source code complexity with enhanced system architecture flexibility and modularity, and enhanced security.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that optimizes and accelerates the transmission and processing of data in communication systems and networks in which substantially all data transmission and processing operations are atomic and stateless.
Yet another key object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that can optimize and accelerate the transmission and processing of data in communication systems and networks without adding significant additional overhead and complexity, and without resulting in a lack of standardization and compatibility across platforms, networks, and systems.
It is another key object of the present invention to provide a system, method, and computer program product that can optimize and accelerate the transmission and processing of data in communication systems and computer networks using a universal protocol or language capable of interfacing with TCP/IP and the layers above the transport layer in the OSI model—i.e., the session, presentation, and application layers.
Still another key object of the present invention to provide a system, method, and computer program product that can optimize and accelerate the transmission and processing of data in communication systems and computer networks that is designed to separate data translation from data transport and eliminate the transport of translation data and the overhead associated therewith.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that transmits and processes data with increased reliability, security, and speed by reducing the number of processing layers used in conventional communication systems and computer networks.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system, method, and computer program product for optimized and accelerated data transmission and processing that is highly scalable, extensible, and flexible.
Yet another object of the present invention to provide a system, method, and computer program product for optimized and accelerated data transmission and processing having an architecture and design that enables substantially seamless integration with any hardware platform, operating system, and any desktop and enterprise application.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a system, method, and computer program product for optimized and accelerated data transmission and processing that can be implemented on any wired or wireless communication medium.
Another key object of the present invention is to provide a system, method, and computer program product that can more efficiently utilize existing bandwidth in communication systems and computer networks by optimizing data transmission and processing through the use of a protocol, referred to as an accelerated transport protocol (ATP), that reduces the amount of data required to be transmitted.
The present invention achieves these objects and others by providing a system, method, and computer program product for optimization and acceleration of data transport and processing in a communication system or computer network, the system comprising one or more client devices each running a client application module, one or more communication server modules, a launcher module, and a controller module for initiating system modules, allocating system resources, and monitoring system operation. The system also includes a management console module for performing administrative functions of the system. The client device and communication server module are adapted to communicate through wired and wireless means in a computer network or communications system. A client application module is the means through which data, such as data to be stored in a database system or data representing a data retrieval request from a database system, is translated from its original format into an accelerated transport protocol format for optimized and accelerated transport to a communication server module. A client application module also receives reply data from a communication server module and translates the received data from ATP format back to its original format. A communication server module performs the functions of receiving client transaction request data from a client application and sending reply data to a client application. A communication server module also performs the functions of translating the data received from a client application from ATP format back to its original format, and translating data to be sent to a client application into ATP format. The controller module is responsible for creating the interface between the communication server modules and the launcher module, which involves the creation of processing queues. The launcher module manages the processing of client transactions by launching and controlling agents that process the client transactions by retrieving data from processing queues and processing the transactions. Results data from an agent after processing of a transaction is sent to the processing queue for transport to a client application.
Further features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the present invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSThe accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form part of the specification, illustrate various embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as particular networks, communication systems, computers, terminals, devices, components, techniques, data and network protocols, software products and systems, enterprise applications, operating systems, enterprise technologies, middleware, development interfaces, hardware, etc. in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. Detailed descriptions of well-known networks, communication systems, computers, terminals, devices, components, techniques, data and network protocols, software products and systems, enterprise applications, operating systems, enterprise technologies, middleware, development interfaces, and hardware are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the present invention.
I. System Architecture and General Design Concepts
The design of the software for the system, method, and computer program product of the present invention takes a novel approach based upon the MISA principle, which stands for “Make It Simple Again.” The system, method, and computer program product of the present invention optimizes and accelerates the transport and processing of data in communication systems and computer networks by using an accelerated transport protocol, referred to as “ATP,” and an atomic stateless design, and by achieving a complete separation of communication state processing and application state processing, thereby minimizing processing layers and times, and increasing security and reliability, and reducing system complexity.
A. System Architecture
With reference to
In particular, the system 50 includes a client application module 52 implemented in a client device 54, a communication server module 56, a launcher module 58, and a controller module 60 for initiating system modules, allocating system resources, and monitoring system operation. The system 50 also includes a management console module 62 for performing administrative functions of the system 50 including configuration, logging, auditing, and security functions. The modules of the system 50 are coupled to one another by data flow links 70.
The client application module 52 is the means through which data, such as data to be stored in a database system or data representing a data retrieval request from a database system, is translated into the ATP format for transport to the communication server module 56. The data sent is in the form of an ATP invocation request packet, which will be explained in detail below. The client application module 52 also receives data in the form of an ATP invocation result packet, which will be explained in detail below, and translates the received data from ATP format back to its original format. The communication server module 56 performs the functions of receiving data (i.e., ATP invocation request packets) from the client applications 52 and sending data (i.e., ATP invocation result packets) to client applications 52. The communication server module 56 also performs the functions of translating the data received from the client applications 52 from ATP format back to its original format, and translating data to be sent to the client applications 52 into ATP format. The control module 60 is responsible for creating the interface between the communication server module 56 and the launcher module 58, which involves the creation of processing queues 92, which will be explained in detail below. The launcher module 58 manages the processing of client transactions by launching and controlling agents 94, which will be described in detail below, that retrieve transaction requests and data from processing queues 92 and process the transaction. The agents 94 send any results after processing of the transaction to the processing queues 92 for transport to the client application 52. The structure and operation of the main modules 52, 56, 58, and 60 will be described in greater detail hereinafter following a discussion of the general design concepts of the data transport and processing optimization and acceleration system 50.
B. General Design Concepts
1. Separation of Communication State and Application State
The architecture of system 50 provides for a complete separation of communication state processing and application state processing. The system 50 is specifically designed to separate all communication state processing from the backend application state processing. Communication state refers to the process of maintaining a network connection between a client devise, such as client device 54, and a server device, such as communication server 56. This process involves, for example, the maintenance of link status, the binding of session information, the negotiation of security protocol, the compression of data, the sending and acknowledgement of data transmission, and validity checks of data transmission content. Application state refers to the process of executing a function or set of functions through some type of application interface that performs or causes the performance of a set amount of work within an application's operational context—e.g., a browser processing HTML pages from a web server, a desktop application processing datasets from a SQL database, an order entry system outputting invoices to a printer.
Referring to
2. Stateless Atomic Design
The design of the system 50 is based on stateless atomic design concepts. Utilizing a stateless atomic design, essentially all operations in the system 50 affecting data transport and processing execute in a stateless context. More specifically, essentially all data transport and processing steps carried out in the system 50, with the exception of the client application module 52, are stateless. Referring again to
In the system 50, a given piece of system functionality is viewed as a series of required processing steps/requests needed to complete a given piece of client functionality. Each step/request can contain a series of operations. Each step/request is stateless and the individual operations contained within each step/request are atomic by nature. In other words, each operation within the step/request does not rely on any system preparation or context creation generated from another step/request. If the step/request fails, only that particular step/request needs to be processed. This requires the transporting and processing of only that request/step.
The system 50 and, particularly, the ATP platform 80 can process each individual request and response with the least number of computational operations required since all state processing and associated diagnostic recovery procedures can be omitted. The overall result is a single dimensional recovery and sequencing system for the client 54.
The atomic stateless design characteristics of the data transport and processing system 50 are specifically tuned towards atomic recovery—i.e., operation status is TRUE or FALSE. A specific operation may involve several steps to actually perform the operation. For example, a query application could use one or more nested searches to actually perform the operation. Since, in order to carry out the query operation, several steps need to be performed, the operation by its nature is not atomic. Utilizing the data transport and processing system 50, if any of the steps in the operation fail, the result is a single point FALSE status. No unwinding steps, backing out database entries, or any other multi-step recovery is necessary in the data transport and processing system 50 of the present invention. In system 50, there is no such state that would leave the ATP platform 80 or the client 54 with partial results. The transaction either completes or it does not, and if it does riot, the transaction is sent again. This methodology which is employed in the design of the system 50 is referred to as “single step recovery on failure” (SSRF) methodology. Adopting this methodology results in a more reliable system, while minimizing code size and processing times.
In contrast, a system design that is “non-atomic” would have, by its nature, separate steps/requests that have a direct dependency on other steps. An example of such a system design is a simple database insertion program. If the designer created two separate steps, one for opening the database (DB_OPEN) and one for inserting the data into the database (DB_INSERT), he/she could create such a condition. This is not atomic because, if the first request succeeded (DB_OPEN) and then database connection failed before the next request can be made, the second request (DB_INSERT) would then fail. Reissuing the DB_INSERT request will continue to fail because of its implied relationship with the DB_OPEN request. The DB_OPEN request establishes a mandatory context needed for the DB_INSERT to be successful. Thus, instead of a single step recovery, multiple requests would need to be made to recover from the failure.
Referring now to the illustration of the programming steps necessary to carry out an operation in a generic process implemented based on an atomic stateless model, as shown in
The system 50 of the present invention and, more particularly, the modules comprising the ATP platform 80 are able to achieve atomic stateless operation because the client 54 and client application 52 running on the client 54 are not a stateless design and can be tasked with maintaining state.
3. Request/Reply Model
In the design of the optimization and acceleration system 50, a request/reply model is overlaid on top of a three-tiered client/server architecture. Simply put, in the system 50, each transaction request by a client 54 will result in a transaction reply to the client 54 making the request. As part of the implementation of this request/reply model in a preferred embodiment of the system 50, data is transmitted across multiple communication channels to redundant servers 54 until a reply is received that confirms a successful transmission. All operations, regardless of their intended operation, will result in a reply relating the full scope of success or failure. Full scope, as used in the context of system 50, encompasses all failure points to the success completion of the operation. The only exception will be in instances where the system 50 is interfacing with legacy systems that use a batch oriented mode of operation. In that case, full scope can only measure up to the actual successful insertion into the batch operations inbound queue.
Designing system 50 based on a request/reply model allows for a complete end-to-end authentication of all transactions. As a result, the system 50 has a solid basis for determining failure conditions with a specific diagnostic recovery routine.
4. Query Buffering Controls
As previously described, the modules in the ATP platform 80 follow a stateless paradigm, and all information regarding state is maintained by the client application module 52. The client application module 52 controls all data flow-control through the use of a query list. By implementing query buffering controls, such as a query list, in the client application module 52, the client 54 can control state since it is able to retain both the data and the methods that act upon that data.
For example, due to certain buffer size limitations and bandwidth limitations that will likely exist when a relational data query returns a large amount of records in a single search, the client application module 52 will need to sequence these records into groups for an orderly retrieval from the communication server module 56. More specifically, if a query to an order entry database returns 500 records, receiving all of these records at one time in the client 54 could result in overloading the capacity of the client 54, such as might be the case where the client 54 is a handheld device or personal digital assistant. In such a case, perhaps 50 records returned to the client 54 at one time would be most appropriate based on available resources and equipment of the client 54. Since the ATP platform 80 and, more specifically, the communication server module 56 only processes stateless operations, it does not track which searches have already been performed and how many records have been returned to the client 54 for a particular operation. Thus, the client 54 needs to provide sequencing control to implement the return of only 50 records per query request. The client application module 52 achieves this by keeping track of its own state with the use of the following three protocol level controls for query request:
-
- TotalRecords char 10—This holds the total number of records in a search.
- TransRecords char 1 0—This holds the number of records in return buffer.
NextRecord char 10—This holds the next record to retrieve in search.
RecRequest char 10—This holds the maximum number of records to return.
Use of the four protocol level controls allows the client application module 52 to implement any type of control structure to hold the incoming data. Storage threshold boundaries can then be isolated with additional controlled search requests.
II. Structure and Architecture of System and Modules
A more detailed description of the structure and software architecture of the system and modules of the present invention is provided with reference to
As shown in
Any one or more of the communication server modules 56, launcher module 58, and controller module 60 can be implemented and operating on the same computer, processor, or device, or separate computers, processors, or devices depending on factors, such as for example, the required processing power, the number of transactions to be processed, the volume of data transported, size of database, number of clients, geographic proximity of clients and applications, and the configuration and implementation of the application or applications the system is integrating with for data transport and processing.
Referring to
A. Client Device
Referring to
With reference to
B. Client Application Module
Referring now to
The windows application controls module 110 is a standard windows control, such as the windows control available for Microsoft Windows 95/98/ME/2000/NT or Microsoft Windows CE, Pocket PC, or the like. The local storage subsystem 118 is provided for customized input applications. Even if the client device 54 is having transmission difficulties, the client application module 52 should not prevent the entering of data. A database 120, such as a standardized CE database, is used to store the input request. The database 120 is then resynchronized when the transmission link is restored. The current design of the present invention will also extend itself to provide sever synchronization from the desktop. This function is designed to provide a failure backup system for using a desktop computer to provide an alternate pathway for transaction processing when a remote network connection cannot be made with a wireless device, such as a PDA.
The communication subsystem 114 is the heart of the client application module 52. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the communication subsystem 114 implements a windows socket interface for moving transaction messages to and from the communication server module 56. The following major functions are supported:
The configuration subsystem 116 provides individual client configuration and allocates storage on the client device 54 for saving the configuration in a database 122. All configuration files in certain configurations are, for example, in standard ASCII formatted text files located in the same directory as the client application module 52.
The customized applications module 112 of the client application module framework is used for building specific vertical applications. Most clients 54 will use some level of windows controls layered on top of one or more dialogues. Palm clients will have a set of Palm-OS controls. Each individual function in this area will be responsible for data input and output, syntax and semantic checks, and recovery from user input errors. The final result of all input applications will be a transaction message request fully formed and ready for transfer. The final result of all output (query) applications will be a process dissemination of a transaction message reply into a set of client controls.
C. Server Device
Referring to
With reference to
D. Controller Module
With reference to
The controller module 60 is implemented, in a preferred embodiment, as a COM service, started by the Windows NT Service Control Manager (SCM) at system startup. Alternatively, the interactive user of a Windows NT desktop may operate the controller module 60 in console mode.
The controller module 60 implements functionality to load and persist configuration data to a configuration file; create and destroy the MSMQ queues 92 used for interprocess communication by the other modules; instantiate, launch, and provide initial operational parameters to each communication server module 56 as well as the launcher module 58 and the logging module; and facilitate access by management tools to the management interfaces of the controller itself, as well as the communication server modules 56, launcher module 58, and logging module.
E. Communication Server Module
With reference to
The communication server module 56 is implemented, in a preferred embodiment, as a COM out-of-proc server, so that it can be automatically started by the controller module 60 during the controller initialization process. The following functionality is implemented: TCP/IP listener function; TCP/IP receive and send; decoding and encoding of ATP packets; negotiation and establishment of encrypted channels with clients; opening of send MSMQ queue and the reply MSMQ queue based on information from the controller module provided at communication server module startup; and logging of significant events and errors (multiple levels of logging can be specified via configuration file).
F. Process Queue
With reference to
The process queue 92 handles all requests from the communication server module 56. The queue 92 can be an enterprise system when implemented on a different computer from the launcher module 58, or an interprocess system when implemented on the same computer as the launcher module 58.
The controller module 60 creates the MSMQ environment during server initialization. The controller module 60 creates a request queue, and one reply queue for each communication server module 56. Each communication server module 56 will have its own MSMQ reply queue. Each reply queue is used in the process of transporting responses from agents 94 to communication server modules 56 for delivery to the client application module 52.
G. Launcher Module
With reference to
The main processing is performed in one or more concurrent worker threads. When a transaction is removed from the request queue, a worker thread is dispatched to begin the processing of the work of the transaction. All control messages are handled in the primary thread.
The primary thread performs the following functions:
-
- COM Initialization and Termination
- shutdown—take down the launcher and agents
- Creation/destruction of worker threads
After a transaction is passed to a worker thread the primary thread is no longer concerned with the transaction.
The worker threads perform the following functions:
-
- Wait for incoming transaction on request queue
- Bind to a COM interface to handle transaction.
- Make method call to process transaction
- Wait until method is finished and reply is returned (blocked mode)
- Insert reply in MSMQ reply queue
- Clean-up COM/DCOM invocation
- Return to wait state; waiting for another transaction in request queue
The interface between launcher module 58 and the COM agents 94 is a well-defined COM interface, ICommandAgent. The COM model is location independent so that COM is responsible for finding the COM server as an in-process or out-of-process server. The current version of COM operates in blocked mode (wait until method finishes), which drove the design of launcher module 58 to use a worker threads for each COM call outstanding.
H. Agents
With reference to
I. Management Console Module
The management console module 62 performs session management and the administration of deployments within the system 50. The management and administration functions performed by the management console module 62 include the management and version of thick and thin clients, management of terminals, integration with specific service agents, auditing, authentication, caching of frequently accessed information, and the administration of key session and user variables.
III. Operation of System and Modules
Referring now to
A. Accelerated Transport Protocol
As noted above with reference to
The inventor of the data transport and processing system 50 of the present invention recognized the severe fragmentation and lack of industry adoption and agreement with respect to a protocol or language for interfacing with TCP/IP and the layers above the transport layer and the deficiencies caused thereby, and developed a protocol for universal data payload delivery. The architecture and design of the system 50 of the present invention rests on the primary premise of a commonly understood principle of agnostic data description, requiring a protocol for universal data payload delivery. Thus, the inventor of the data transport and processing system 50 of the present invention developed a protocol, referred to as the accelerated transport protocol, “ATP”.
ATP is based on the characteristic that all data can be classified, described, and represented to an application as a data type (int, float, char, varchar, variant, dataset, etc.). ATP is a low-level protocol, designed to enable invocation of remote agents 94 over any network 90, including networks with potentially unstable and slow links. The design emphasis for ATP is on the most lightweight, bandwidth-efficient model possible. To this end, more advanced features found in other remote procedure call (RPC) mechanisms have been omitted.
ATP provides the ability to invoke an agent operation, optionally providing one or more parameters in the form of simple data types. ATP is also responsible for returning any output parameters and return values from the agent operation, as well as any error information. Though ATP itself is not responsible for authentication, encryption, or access control, it does provide support for security information within the stream, thereby providing the ability for higher-level implementation of such functionality.
Referring to
1. ATP Data Types, Data Type Codes, Datasets, and Errors
ATP uses a single byte to identify the data type of a parameter, then four or more bytes for length if the type is of variable length. This is followed by the data that represents the value. With reference to
First, a simple, one-dimensional fixed array of 10 longs, declared in C as:
-
- long[10]={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}
This parameter would be represented in ATP as:
Next, consider a slightly more complicated example, involving a two-dimensional fixed array of 10×5 longs. This would be declared in C as:
-
- long[10][5]={{1,2,3,4,5}, . . . ,{46,47,48,49,50}}
This would be represented in ATP as:
As a final variation, consider the previous example, with the complication that the first dimension is of variable size. That is, the magnitude of the first dimension is known only at runtime. This necessitates a second parameter to contain the magnitude of the first dimension. Thus:
Referring now to
With reference to
The format for the ATP dataset data type is shown in
Referring now to
2. Optimization Using ATP
The following describes how, using the ATP format for the transporting and processing of data in system 50, the process of data transport and processing is optimized and accelerated. Often, large (two or four-byte) integers are used only because they are required to represent all possible values, when the vast majority of the time a smaller integer would do. In the operation of system 50 using ATP, the client application module 52 and modules of the ATP platform 80 implement an optimization whereby multi-byte integer parameters can be declared such that they are optimized for a smaller size.
For example, consider the Security Data Length field of an ATP Method Invocation Request packet, as shown in
This optimization is implemented quite simply, though it requires the client and server to be aware of the optimization, as no information regarding the optimization is present in the stream. If the value to be sent is less than the maximum (or greater than the minimum, for signed types) allowed value for the smaller, optimized type, that value is sent. If, on the other hand, the value will not fit in the smaller, optimized type, a value the size of the smaller type is sent with all bits set, followed by the value in its full size. The tradeoff inherent to this optimization is that if values are larger than their optimized types, more bytes are required for transmission than would be to send the native type.
Consider, for example, a parameter of type unsigned long, which requires four bytes to send. In the case of this parameter, most values will be less than 65,535. Therefore, in most cases, an unsigned short type would suffice. However, there are cases when the values are larger than 65,535, in which case the full four bytes are required. ATP will transmit the following data:
Note that when the actual value is greater than OR EQUAL TO the maximum representable value of the optimized type, the native type is transmitted as well. However, the savings is significant enough to justify the excess overhead for exceptions. In the above example, the optimized type is used only 60% of the time, yet even with this low hit rate, a bandwidth savings of 10% (18 bytes instead of 20) is realized. At higher hit rates, the savings are potentially even greater.
This optimization can be applied to any multi-byte integer type. This optimization is still valid in the case of arrays of multi-byte integers. To determine what, if any, optimization should be used, a mathematical analysis of the algorithm is necessary. Since we need to know what proportion of the total number of integers of a given parameter need to be sufficiently small to optimize in order to realize efficiency gains, we will compare the total number of bytes required to transfer an optimized series of integers versus a non-optimized series of integers. Consider:
- t=Total number of multi-byte integers being transfered
- o=Number of multi-byte integers having values small enough for optimized type
- Xnative=Size (in bytes) of native type of multi-byte integers being transfered
- Xoptimized=Size(in bytes) of optimized type of multi-byte integers being transfered
- boptimized=Number of bytes required to transfer t multi-byte integers using the optimization
- bunoptimized=Number of bytes required to transfer t multi-byte integers without optimization
Then, - bunoptimized=txnative
and - boptimized=oxoptimized+(t−o)(xoptimized+xnative)
We want to determine under what circumstances boptimized is less than bunoptimized, thereby allowing us to determine when the optimization technique will be worthwhile. Thus:
- boptimized≦bunoptimized
- oxoptimized+(t−o)(xoptimized+xnative)≦txnative
- oxoptimized+txoptimized+txnative−oxoptimized−oxnative≦txnative
- txoptimized+txnative−oxnative≦txnative
- txoptimized−oxnative≦0
- txoptimized≦oxnative
Given this inequality, we want to know specifically how t and o must compare in order to achieve a performance enhancement. Thus:
Clearly, in order for the optimization to be equal to or greater than the efficiency of an unoptimized transmission, the proportion of optimizable integers to total integers must be equal to or greater than the proportion of the size of the optimized type to the size of the native type. For example, assume a native type of four bytes. One is attempting to ascertain what, if any, optimized type should be selected for the data. From above, in order for the optimization to be effective:
Clearly, the optimization is more effective for smaller optimized sizes. Surprisingly, if a mere 25% of the integers in the above example will fit in one byte, the transmission size will be equal to an unoptimized transmission. Any more than 25% and efficiency gains will be made. Given this information, let us now derive an equation to determine the efficiency gains under specific circumstances.
Thus, the efficiency gains yielded by this optimization technique vary in direct proportion to the number of integers that qualify for the optimization
3. ATP Request and Response Packets
Referring to
a. ATP Session Initiation Request
Referring to
b. ATP Session Initiation Response
Referring now to
c. ATP Method Invocation Request
Referring now to
d. ATP Method Invocation Response
Referring now to
4. ATP Flags and Security Flags
a. ATP Flags
Referring now to
b. ATP. Security Flags
Referring now to
B. System Operation—Functional Sequence
Referring back to
1. Client code calls method on automatically generated Command Agent proxy object.
2. Command Agent proxy creates ATP method invocation request packet, requesting the method and agent corresponding to the called method on the proxy as the target. Any input parameters to the proxy method are also packaged.
3. The proxy transmits the invocation request packet, via TCP/IP or another suitable transport, to an instance of the Altarus Server TCP/IP Server or other Altarus Server communication interface.
4. The Altarus Server TCP/IP Server receives the request, and decodes the invocation information.
5. The Altarus Server TCP/IP server instantiates an Invocation object, populating it with the data from the invocation request packet.
6. The Altarus Server Launcher Interface, called by the Altarus Server TCP/IP Server, serializes the Invocation object and places the serialized Invocation object data in the Altarus Server Launcher Request Queue.
7. The Altarus Server Invocation Queue Interface, called by the Altarus Server Launcher, deserializes the Invocation object from the Altarus Server Launcher Request Queue and returns the Invocation object to the Altarus Server Launcher.
8. The Altarus Server Launcher verifies that the requested agent and operation are available, then passes the Invocation object to the requested agent, indicating the operation being invoked.
9. The agent stub receives the invocation request, and translates it into a standard method call on the agent implementation object
10. The agent implementation object performs the function it is written to perform, populates any output parameters, and returns success or failure data to the agent stub
11. The agent stub packages the results of the invocation into the Invocation object, and returns it to the Altarus Server Launcher
12. The Altarus Server Launcher passes the Invocation object to the Altarus Server Invocation Queue Interface
13. The Altarus Server Invocation Queue Interface serializes the Invocation object, and places it in the Altarus Server TCP/IP Server reply queue.
14. The Altarus Server Launcher Interface retrieves the serialized Invocation object data, deserializes it, and populates a new Invocation object with the data.
15. The Altarus Server Launcher Interface returns the Invocation object to the Altarus Server TCP/IP server
16. The Altarus Server TCP/IP server packages the Invocation object data into an ATP invocation results packet, and sends it to the client
17. The client Command Agent proxy receives the invocation results packet, decodes it, populates any output parameters, and returns the error state indicates by the result packet.
Referring now to FIGS. 14A-D, the end-to-end flow of execution of an exemplary method invocation using the accelerated transport protocol (ATP) of the present invention is shown which traces the example invocation through each of the components and modules of the system 50.
In this exemplary system operation, the method being invoked is a method implemented by a simple database access agent. This method takes one input parameter of type ATP_LONG (32-bit signed integer), which uniquely identifies a row in a relational database. The agent looks up this number, and produces a value for the method's only output parameter, which is of type ATP_STRING (null-terminated Unicode string). This string is the textual name associated with the given ID.
A C declaration of this function might be:
-
- void LookupName(/*[in]*/APT_LONG id,/*[out]*/ATP_STRING*name);
A more complex example could include multiple [in] and [out] parameters, advanced data types like arrays and datasets, and some [in,out] parameters as well. However, in terms of system operation and data flow, the less complex example set forth herein and the more complex example noted would illustrate the same system functionality, operation, and architecture.
With reference to the flow diagram of
-
- 1) Invocation Request—Client Code
- a) Client code makes call to proxy implementation of LookupNarne, passing a value of 5 for the [in] parameter, id.
- 2) Invocation Request—Client Proxy Code
- a) Machine-generated client proxy code implements LookupName. Upon receiving the method call from the client code, the machine generated proxy calls the ATP implementation library to marshal the [in] parameter id.
- b) The machine-generated client proxy code then calls the ATP library implementation function to send the invocation request to the target host.
- 3) Invocation Request—Client ATP Implementation
- a) The ATP implementation, using the marshaled [in] parameter data build previously, constructs an ATP Invocation Request packet.
- b) The ATP implementation sends the invocation request packet to the target host using whichever underlying transport protocol is appropriate.
- 1) Invocation Request—Client Code
With reference to the flow diagram in
-
- 4) Invocation Request—Communication Server
- a) Receive invocation request packet from client.
- b) Decode and validate invocation request packet, validating packet signature, contents, etc.
- c) Validate session ID and packet cryptographic signature, if present.
- d) Decrypt packet data, if encrypted.
- e) Decompress packet data, if compressed.
- f) Serialize invocation data to prepare for enqueuing.
- g) Enqueue serialized invocation data into Launcher request queue.
- 4) Invocation Request—Communication Server
With reference to the flow diagram of
-
- 5) Invocation Request—Launcher
- a) Dequeue invocation request from Launcher request queue.
- b) Decode Serialized invocation request data.
- c) Examine invocation receipt ID. If a previous invocation result with the same receipt ID is present in the receipt store, load the results saved in the receipt store, and place the saved results in the comm server's reply queue. Stop processing this invocation.
- d) Lookup invocation request agent ID and verify valid agent.
- e) Lookup invocation request session ID, and load appropriate session data for session store.
- f) Call the agent specified in the invocation request, passing the session data, the marshaled parameter stream, and the ID of the operation being invoked.
- 5) Invocation Request—Launcher
With reference to the flow diagram of
-
- 6) Invocation Request—Example Agent Stub
- a) Unmarshall [in] parameter id from marshaled parameter stream.
- b) Call implementation, passing [in] parameter id.
- 7) Invocation Request—Example Agent Impl
- a) Establish database connection.
- b) Execute query to resolve parameter id to a name.
- c) Retrieve associated name.
- d) Place associated name in [out] parameter name.
- 8) Invocation Response—Example Agent Stub
- a) Marshal [out] parameter name into marshaled parameter stream.
- 6) Invocation Request—Example Agent Stub
Referring now back to the flow diagram of
-
- 9) Invocation Response—Launcher
- a) Serialize invocation results, including marshaled parameter stream from a agent.
- b) Save serialized invocation results in receipt store, keyed on the invocation's receipt ID.
- c) Enqueue the invocation results into the comm server response queue.
- 9) Invocation Response—Launcher
Referring now back to the flow diagram of
-
- 10) Invocation Response—Communication Server
- a) Get serialized invocation results from response queue.
- b) Decode invocation results.
- c) Build invocation response packet for invocation results. Compress and encrypt if necessary.
- d) Transmit response packet to client.
- 10) Invocation Response—Communication Server
Referring now back to the flow diagram of
-
- 11) Invocation Response—Client APT Implementation
- a) Receive invocation response packet from comm server.
- b) Decode invocation response packet, decrypting and decompressing if necessary.
- 12) Invocation Response—Client Proxy Code
- a) Unmarshall [out] parameter name from marshaled parameter stream.
- b) Return name to caller.
- 13) Invocation Response—Client Code
- a) When proxy returns, [out] parameter name is returned.
- 11) Invocation Response—Client APT Implementation
4. Security Using ATP
The following describes the implementation of security features in the system 50 and, more specifically, using ATP. There are two facets of security addressed at the ATP level: encryption and authentication. Encryption is taken to mean the securing of ATP packets such that they (i) either cannot be read by unauthorized parties or (ii) they can be read, but cannot be altered. Authentication is taken to mean the identification of the principal on the client to the server, for the purposes of access control, auditing, etc. Both authentication and encryption require the use of sessions. That is, establishing authentication and encryption must be done using ATP Session Init Request/Response packets. Once this is performed, the resultant session ID must be included in all method invocation packets. In this way, authentication and encryption information is established once, during session initiation, and used throughout the conversation.
a. Encryption
The implementation of security in the system 50 using ATP encryption functionality is sufficient to provide a secure channel for communication between clients and servers. Using ATP encryption functionality, Message Authentication Code (MAC) can be used in lieu of actual packet encryption. This ensures that packets are not modified in transit. This level of security ensures the integrity of each packet, and prevents session hijacking attacks, among others.
b. Encryption Negotiation Process
First, the ATP client establishes a connection to an ATP server. The details of this connection are determined by the underlying transport protocol. Second, the ATP client sends an ATP Session Initiation Request packet, with the ATP_FLAG_SEC flag set. This flag indicates that the request includes security information. The security data length field is 3, and the security flags field has ATP_FLAG_CRYPT set. The first byte of the security data field indicates the maximum length RC4 session key supported by the client. The second and third bytes, together a word with the least significant byte being the second byte and the most significant byte being the third byte, indicate the maximum length RSA public key supported by the client.
Third, the ATP server sends an ATP Session Initiation Response packet. The ATP_FLAG_SEC flag is set. The security flags field has ATP_FLAG_CRYPT set. The security data length field is non-zero. The security data field contains the length of the RC4 session key the server will support (in one byte), followed by the RSA public key associated with the server. The length of the key determines the level of encryption. 64 bytes indicates a 512-bit RSA key; 128 bytes indicates a 1024-bit RSA key; 256 bytes indicates a 2048-bit RSA key. The result value is 1 (Additional security information required). The ATP_FLAG_SID flag is set, and the SID field contains a session ID. Note that this session ID is not yet valid for use in method invocation packets. Alternatively, the ATP server sends a response packet a result value of 0 (error), and an error of ATPE_SEC_CRYPTNOTSUPPORTED, ATPE_SEC CRYPTREQUIRED, or ATPE_SEC_CRYPTREQUIRED.
- ATPE_SEC_CRYPNOTSUPPORTED indicates that the server is unwilling to negotiate a secure connection. ATPE_SEC_CRYPTREQUIRED indicates that the server requires a secure connection and the client did not request encryption or didn't request sufficient encryption.
- ATPE_SEC_CRYPTINADEQUATE indicates that the requested key size or strength is not adequate. In either of the latter two cases, the security flags indicate what the server considers adequate.
Fourth, the ATP client generates a random RC4 session key, the size of which is determined by the server, as described above. The ATP client sends an ATP Session Initiation Request packet. The ATP_FLAG_SEC and ATP_FLAG_SID flags are set. The security flags field has ATP_FLAG_CRYPT set. The security data length field contains the length of the security data. The security data field contains the RC4 session key, encrypted using RSA with the server's RSA public key.
Fifth, the ATP server sends an ATP Session Initiation Response packet. The ATP_FLAG_SEC flag is not set, though the ATP_FLAG_SID flag is set. The result code is 2; session successfully initiated. The SID is now valid, and can be used for method invocations. All method invocation requests (and their responses) will now be encrypted with the session key. Encryption of invocation packets is discussed in greater detail below.
Session init request/response packets are not themselves encrypted. Since the contents of these packets are well-known and documented, and knowledge of these contents does not facilitate compromise of the system, it is unnecessary to encrypt these packets.
c. MAC Negotiation Process
Sometimes, the overhead associated with encryption is not necessary, and degrades performance. At the same time, if traffic is being transported over untrusted networks, some means of ensuring that packets are not modified en route needs to be available. The MAC is a fixed-length hash formed by encrypting the one-way hash of a message with the session key. If an attacker were to modify the packet en route, the hash would also have to be modified, otherwise the changes would be detected. Since the attacker does not know the session key, this is not feasible.
Negotiating a MAC is very similar to negotiation of encryption. The process is the same, with two exceptions. First, security flag ATP_FLAG_CRYPT is not set, but instead security flag ATP_FLAG_MAC is set. Second, once negotiation is complete, packets are not encrypted using the negotiated key. Instead, an SHA-1 hash of the packet, encrypted using the negotiated RC4 key, is placed in the security data field of each packet.
d. Encryption of Invocation Packets
When invocation request or response packets are encrypted, only the body of the packet (after the SID) undergoes encryption. The header and security sections are sent cleartext. There are several reasons for this decision:
1. Allows the recipient of the packet to identify the type, size, and other information without decrypting the packet. This allows invalid or malformed packets to be discarded without the overhead of decryption.
2. The SID is used to uniquely identify the session. Many implementations will likely use it to associate keys and internal state with a session. If the SID were encrypted, how would the implementation know how to decrypt it?
3. Much of the header can be predicted based on the protocol spec. This makes a known-plaintext attack all the easier.
For these reasons, the only components of an invocation request/response packet that undergo encryption are the RID, serial number, MCA ID, operation ID, result code, and parameter data.
e. Hashing of Invocation Packets
In contrast to the encryption of invocation packets, the hashing is applied to the entire packet. The hash is stored in the security data field of the packet. The ATP_FLAG_SEC flag is set in the packet flags, the ATP_FLAG_MAC flag is set in the security flags, the security data length is equal to the length of the hash, and the data is the hash itself.
The question of how a hash can be generated when the hash is itself part of the packet will now be discussed. To generate the bash, construct the packet as outlined above, setting all bytes containing the hash to zero. Generate the hash on this packet, and place the hash in the packet. When the packet is received, the opposite procedure will be used to validate the hash.
f. The Serial Number
The serial number in an invocation request packet can be thought of as uniquely identifying that request within the context of the session. The RID does the same thing, but it is optional, and is used for an entirely different purpose. When a session is established, the server sets the serial number for the session to 0. After the first invocation request, the serial number is changed to equal the serial number of the request. Upon receipt of each invocation request, the serial number is checked to ensure that it is greater than the previous serial number. If not, it is rejected. The client is expected to increment its serial number before each invocation, ideally by a small random number.
The serial number is present in invocation request/response packets for a number of reasons. First, the serial number prevents a replay attack against the server. If an intruder were running a packet sniffer on the network between the client and the server, the intruder might intercept an invocation request packet that performed a certain operation; let us assume it is an invocation to deposit $100 into the intruder's bank account.
Since the packet is encrypted, the intruder has no way of discerning the contents of the packet. However, the intruder may be able to ascertain the purpose of the packet. In this case, the intruder could inject a copy of the packet into the network 100 times. This would deposit a total of $10,000 into the intruder's account.
The presence of the serial number defeats this attack. The server knows the last serial number it received. When it receives another packet on the same session, it examines the serial number. The serial number must be greater than the previous serial number otherwise the packet is discarded. While the intruder can repeat the same packet 100 times, the intruder cannot alter the serial number within the packet; therefore, such an attempt would be thwarted. The second purpose of the serial number is to increase the difference between two otherwise identical packets. Consider an invocation that repeats several times during the course of a day. For security reasons, each time it is transmitted, a new session is established, and thus a new session key. However, if an eavesdropper is aware of this, the eavesdropper can obtain multiple packets, encrypted with the different keys, that are otherwise identical (the SID is different, but remember the SID is not encrypted). Some cryptanalysis techniques exploit two ciphertexts known to represent the same plaintext, encrypted with different keys. The presence of a randomly-incremented serial number, while not eliminating the problem, reduces its likelihood of occurring.
The system, method, and computer program product of the present invention can be implemented on any wired or wireless communication medium including, but not limited to, satellite, cellular, wireless or hardwired WAN, LAN, and the like, public communication network, such as the Internet, and private communication network, such as an intranet. The design architecture of the system enables the system to easily integrate with any hardware platform, operating system, and most desktop and enterprise applications. The system is platform, network, and operating system agnostic.
The system, method, and computer program product of the present invention supports a wide range of data and network protocols, including native support for IP, XML, HL7, WAP, i-mode, G3, and other industry standard data and network protocols. The client and client application module of the system, method, and computer program product of the present invention can be implemented using any operating system including, but not limited to, Palm OS, Microsoft Windows CE, Unix, Linux, VMS, IBM, Microsoft Windows NT, 95, 98, 2000, and ME, and the like.
Employing ATP, the system, method, and computer program product of the present invention can transport and process any type of data including ASCII Text, EBCIDIC, binary data, such as streaming video, streaming-real-time audio, image data (e.g., x-ray films), and unicode (i.e., for carrying different dialects of languages—e.g., Chinese, Japanese). The system, method, and computer program product of the present invention provides access to and delivery of content and applications to a full range of devices, regardless of whether the devices connect over wireline or wireless networks. It further provides the ability to seamlessly service multiple connection methods, wired and wireless connectivity service options, and device types (workstations/desktops, handhelds, etc.) at the same time.
The systems, processes, and components set forth in the present description may be implemented using one or more general purpose computers, microprocessors, or the like programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant art(s). Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art(s). The present invention thus also includes a computer-based product which may be hosted on a storage medium and include instructions that can be used to program a computer to perform a process in accordance with the present invention. The storage medium can include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including a floppy disk, optical disk, CDROM, magneto-optical disk, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, flash memory, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, either locally or remotely.
The foregoing has described the principles, embodiments, and modes of operation of the present invention. However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments described above, as they should be regarded as being illustrative and not as restrictive. It should be appreciated that variations may be made in those embodiments by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention.
While a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described above, it should be understood that it has been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by the above described exemplary embodiment.
Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
Claims
1. A method for optimizing and acceleration data transmission and processing associated with an application operating on a network including a first device comprising a first data processor and a first computer readable memory having computer readable instructions encoded therein, and a second device comprising a second data processor and a second computer readable memory having computer readable instructions encoded, the method comprising the steps of:
- implementing said computer readable instructions in said first computer readable memory and in said second computer readable memory;
- storing data in a first format in said first computer readable memory;
- translating the data stored in said first computer readable memory into a second format representing the data as a data type representing the type of data, a data length representing the length of the value of the data, and a data value representing the value of the data;
- translating said data stored in said second format to said second device;
- storing said data received in said second device in said second computer readable memory;
- translating said data stored in said second computer readable memory into said first format; and
- processing the data stored in said second computer readable memory to produce processed data for transmission to said first device.
2-51. (canceled)
Type: Application
Filed: May 5, 2005
Publication Date: Dec 1, 2005
Applicant: ABLESOFT, INC. (Haymarket, VA)
Inventor: David Edgar (Ashburn, VA)
Application Number: 11/122,239
