CONVEYOR BELT

- MOL BELTING COMPANY

A thermoplastic endless belt has a smooth outer surface substantially free of discontinuities and an inner surface with a plurality of teeth at a given belt pitch. The teeth are adapted to engage a sprocket with circumferentially spaced sheaves at a sprocket pitch greater than the belt pitch. The belt is slightly stretchable so that the sprocket can drive the endless belt when engaging the teeth within a range of load on the belt. The belt is preferred for use in conveyors in food processing industries where the smooth outer surface can transport food items and is easier to clean and keep free of impurities.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/505,063 filed Aug. 18, 2004, which is a national phase application based on International Application Serial No. PCT/US03/03029 filed Feb. 3, 2003, which claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 60/319,133 filed Mar. 5, 2002.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to endless belts for conveyors and, more particularly, to thermoplastic endless belts driven by sprockets.

2. Description of the Related Art

Low tension, direct drive conveyor belts are typically used in situations where hygiene and cleanliness are critically important. For example, in food processing plants such as those that process meat products for human consumption, low tension, direct drive belt conveyors are used to transport items. Sanitation is critically important and, therefore, the endless belts used in such conveyors are conventionally made of materials that can be hygienically cleaned, such as thermoplastics or stainless steel.

Known belts are typically formed of interlocking links having teeth that are adapted to engage drive sprockets. One of the problems with such belts is that food particles can become lodged in the joints of the interconnecting links. Consequently, cleaning the belts can be difficult and may require removing the belt from the conveyor system for special cleaning operations.

One solution to this problem is the use of flexible thermoplastic belts without interlocking links such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,697,491. Such belts having a smooth continuous surface (sometimes called “homogeneous belts”) are driven by V-guides wherein a radial groove in a drive pulley engages a longitudinal rib on the underside of the belt. One of the problems with such belts is that grease and oil from the food items can migrate to the groove or to the rib, which causes a loss of friction between the pulley and the belt. Consequently the driving force becomes unstable and unreliable. Moreover, such belts are under tension to ensure that the pulley imparts enough driving force. This tensioning raises other issues beyond slippage due to oils and contaminants. A thermoplastic belt under tension will stretch, which may require adjustment of the tension from time to time. In addition, there are additional costs associated with ensuring that the conveyor frame be sufficiently strong enough to handle the normal stresses of the pretensioned belt plus additional stresses caused by loading the belt.

It is known to provide a drive sprocket or drum with transverse grooves that are complementary in shape to teeth on a flexible conveyor belt, as shown for example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,170,281. However, the belt is formed from interlocking links and the belt is still under tension. The problems associated with interlocking links and pretensioning remain.

Another solution is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,911,307 where a timing belt is added to a homogeneous belt to engage a drive sprocket. As a result, reliance upon friction for motion is minimized, and the belt need not be under tension. There are some remaining problems, however. Assembling a timing belt to a homogeneous belt is costly and the bonding or adhering process is critical. Failure of the bond increases the risk of contamination and total belt failure.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention solves these and other problems by providing a conveyor belt system comprising a drive pulley having an axis of rotation and a plurality of pulley teeth, and a closed belt having a pulley side which faces the drive pulley. The closed belt has a plurality of belt teeth and a plurality of recesses on the pulley side. Each of the recesses has two sides and one base. The drive pulley is configured to rotate about the axis of rotation in order to propel the belt in a drive direction by at least one of the pulley teeth pushing a corresponding one of the sides of one of the recesses. In a cross-sectional view of the drive pulley and the closed belt taken in a plane which is perpendicular to the axis of rotation, the one pulley tooth only partially fills the one recess.

Preferably, each of the pulley teeth has a pulley tooth width, each of the recesses has a recess width; and the pulley tooth width is less than the recess width. Also, each of the pulley teeth has a pulley tooth height, each of the belt teeth has a belt tooth height, and the belt tooth height is less than the pulley tooth height. Optimally, when the closed belt is not loaded, only one of the pulley teeth is in contact with one of the belt teeth. Further, the pulley teeth have a pulley pitch, the belt teeth have a belt pitch measured when the closed belt is flat, and when the closed belt is not loaded, the pulley pitch is greater than the belt pitch.

Preferably, the closed belt is made of a material having a low bacterial count. Also, preferably, the closed belt is made of plastic. The closed belt can be made of non-reinforced plastic.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a perspective side view of a belt according to the invention installed between two sprockets;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged view in elevation of a portion of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2 with the belt under load;

FIG. 4 is a side elevational view of a portion of the belt, partially in cross-section, shown in FIGS. 1-3;

FIG. 5 is a perspective side view of a belt according to the invention installed between two sprockets of a different configuration than FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 5; and

FIG. 7 is diagrammatic view illustrating a method of making a belt according to the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

An endless belt 100 according to the invention is seen in FIG. 1 in a typical installation between two sprockets 102 and 103. The sprockets 102, 103 are conventional and they can be any of a number of different forms and sizes. One sprocket 102 is a drive sprocket, the other 103 being an idler or slave sprocket. In this configuration, the upper span 105 of the belt will travel in the direction of arrow 107. Each sprocket 102 or 103 has a number of transverse grooves or sheaves 104 spaced around its circumference. The belt 100 has a plurality of teeth 106 equidistantly spaced from each other on the inside surface 108 of the belt. The teeth 106 engage the sheaves 104 of each sprocket. It will be understood that any given installation may have one, two, or more sprockets for a single endless belt. Also, for any given installation, one or more of the sprockets may be a drive sprocket, as for example sprocket 102, with the other sprocket or sprockets being idler sprockets. It will be understood that there need only be enough tension on the endless belt 100 to keep at least one of its teeth 106 engaged in a sheave 104 of the drive sprocket 102.

The belt 100 has an outside surface 110 that is fairly smooth and free of discontinuities. Preferably, the belt 100 is made of a thermoplastic material such as Pebax® resin, polyester or polyurethane. The outside surface 110 on the upper span 105 is the carrying surface for transport of items. Because it is smooth and free of discontinuities, there is no place for particles or contaminants to lodge. Moreover, the belt 100 can be cleaned in situ, without the need to remove it from the installation.

Greater detail about the structure of the belt 100 is shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. A combination of material selection and construction enables the belt to stretch within a range of 0-3% of its total length under a load ranging from 0-100 pounds per inch of width (nearly 18 Kg per cm). The belt 100 has a pitch 112 defined as the distance between the centerlines of adjacent teeth 106. The belt pitch 112 is measured along a belt pitch line 114, which corresponds to the neutral bending axis of the belt. As the belt 100 bends around the sprocket 102, the neutral bending axis is that imaginary plane on one side of which the belt material is under compression and on the other side of which the belt material is under tension.

Similarly, the sprocket pitch 116 is the arc length between the centerlines of adjacent sheaves 104, measured along the sprocket's pitch circle 118. The sprocket pitch circle 118 in this case corresponds to the belt pitch line 114 as the belt 100 moves around the sprocket 102. In other words, the sprocket pitch circle 118 will have the same radius as the belt pitch line 114 as the belt goes around the sprocket. For a thermoplastic belt, the area of greatest stress on the belt 100 occurs at zone 120, and the area of least stress occurs at zone 122 just as the belt is released from the drive sprocket 102.

Looking now also at FIG. 4, it can be seen that each tooth 106 extends upwardly from a surrounding inner surface 124 of the belt 100. Preferably, the belt 100 has a thickness between adjacent teeth 106 in a range of approximately 3 to 4 mm, although it will be understood that the actual thickness will depend upon a given application. The invention is not limited to a particular thickness of the belt. For this embodiment, each tooth 106 stands approximately 4 mm above the inner surface 124. Each tooth 106 has tapered sidewalls 126, each sidewall preferably tapering from the inner surface 124 at an angle of about 72.5 degrees. Each tooth will thus have a width at its base wider than that at the tip. Each sheave 104 on the sprocket 102 is wider than the corresponding tooth 106 on the belt 100, preferably on the order of 11 to 15 percent, and is tapered with drive walls 128. Thus, for example, if the widest part of the tooth 106 is 8 mm, the widest part of a sheave 104 might be 11.25 mm, permitting a belt stretch of up to 3% where the teeth 106 can still be received in the sheaves 104. If the widest part of a sheave is 10 mm, the widest part of a tooth can be 7 mm in order to permit belt stretch of up to 3%. It is recognized that the belt will not stretch evenly, i.e., it will stretch more between the teeth than including the teeth. This is because the belt is thinner between the teeth than at the teeth. Nevertheless, stretch here is measured overall, regardless of which portion of the belt is actually stretching under load. Also, the depth of each sheave 104 is greater than the height of each tooth 106 wherein each drive wall 128 is longer than a corresponding sidewall 126 so that the tooth will not bottom out in the sheave.

The belt pitch 112 when the belt 100 is at rest is less than the sprocket pitch 116. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 2, a belt 100 under no load will effectively be driven in the stress zone 120 by the drive wall 128 of a single sheave 104 acting against sidewall 126 of a single tooth 106 received within the sheave. On the other hand, as illustrated in FIG. 3, a belt 100 under load P tends to stretch so that the belt pitch 112, especially within the stress zone 120, more nearly equals the sprocket pitch 116. In this case, more teeth 106 are engaged by corresponding sheaves 104. Under maximum stress, the belt pitch 112 will equal the sprocket pitch 116 as the belt 100 is pulled around the sprocket 102. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3 wherein the sprocket 102 has ten sheaves 104, the maximum number of sheaves that will drive a corresponding tooth, at least in whole or in part, is six. Since the teeth 106 are smaller than the sheaves 104, and since the belt pitch 112 is smaller than the sprocket pitch 116 (below maximum load), the elasticity of the belt will permit anywhere from one to six teeth on the belt to be driven by the sprocket 102. The higher the load on the belt, the more teeth will be engaged by the sprocket.

Looking now at FIGS. 5 and 6, it can be seen that a belt 150 according to the invention can be used with existing sprockets. Here, the belt 150 is shown installed on sprockets 152 and 153 of the type that can be obtained from Intralox, Inc. Sprocket 152 may be a drive sprocket, in which case sprocket 153 will be the slave sprocket. Each sprocket 152, 153 has a number of transverse grooves or sheaves 154 adapted to receive teeth 156 in driving engagement as described above. The relative dimensions of components in this embodiment will be as described above for the embodiment of FIGS. 2 and 3. In addition, there may be tracking tabs 158 adapted to engage corresponding slots 160 in the belt 150 to maintain proper alignment of the belt.

Preferably, the teeth 106, 156 will be integral with the belt 100, 150. A method of making an endless belt according to the invention is shown in FIG. 7. An appropriate thermoplastic material such as polyester or polyurethane is placed in an extruder 170. Using conventional extrusion methods, a flat ribbon 172 of thermoplastic material is extruded from the extrusion nozzle 174. While the flat ribbon 172 is still soft and malleable, it is passed over a profile drum 176. The profile drum 176 has on its outer surface a plurality of grooves 178 corresponding in shape to the teeth 106, 156 to be formed. A compression drum or belt 180 presses against the flat ribbon 172, compressing the ribbon, and forcing a portion of the flow into the grooves 178. Upon exiting the profile drum 176, the formed ribbon 182 passes through a cooling station 184 where it hardens. The temperature of the flat ribbon 172, the pressure on the ribbon 172 between the compression drum 180 and the profile drum 176, and the cooling time are all established and determined to anticipate the final thickness of the belt, the dimensions of each tooth, and the belt pitch. In this respect, it will be understood that there is a predetermined amount of shrinkage of the formed ribbon 182 as it cools. Upon cooling, the formed belt is collected and stored until it is needed to form an endless belt.

Another method of manufacturing the belt is to start with a homogeneous belt of approximately 7 to 8 mm in thickness, and machine away material between adjacent teeth 106, 156 to a depth of about 3 to 4 mm. This method necessarily generates scrap.

Another method of manufacturing the belt is to start with a homogeneous belt approximately 3-4 mm in thickness, and injection mold teeth at an appropriate belt pitch onto one surface of the belt. In this method, the teeth can be different material. For example, the belt can be formed of polyester such as COPE, with the teeth being formed of a urethane.

Another method of manufacturing the belt is to start with a homogeneous belt approximately 3-4 mm in thickness, and friction mold teeth at an appropriate belt pitch onto one surface of the belt. In this method, the teeth can be different material. For example, the belt can be formed of polyester such as COPE, with the teeth being formed of a urethane. It has been found that applying a 160 Hz orbital motion of a polyester tooth on a polyester belt for three seconds creates enough softening for the tooth to bond to the belt.

It will be understood that certain variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the length of each tooth need not extend to the edge of the belt as illustrated. A narrow rank of teeth may be sufficient. Further, a narrow belt having a rank of teeth can be preformed and adhered or bonded to an inner surface of a larger belt. Moreover, if desired, coloring pigments and/or antibacterial agents can be added to the thermoplastic prior to extrusion.

While the invention has been specifically described in connection with certain specific embodiments thereof, it is to be understood that this is by way of illustration and not of limitation, and the scope of the appended claims should be construed as broadly as the prior art will permit.

Claims

1. A conveyor belt system comprising: (a) a drive pulley having a plurality of pulley teeth thereon, said drive pulley having an axis of rotation; and (b) a closed belt having a pulley side which faces said drive pulley, wherein: (i) said closed belt has a plurality of belt teeth and a plurality of recesses on said pulley side, each of said recesses having two sides and one base; (ii) said drive pulley is configured to rotate about said axis of rotation in order to propel said belt in a drive direction by at least one of said pulley teeth pushing a corresponding one of said sides of one of said recesses; and (iii) in a cross-sectional view of said drive pulley and said closed belt taken in a plane which is perpendicular to said axis of rotation, said one pulley tooth only partially fills said one recess.

2. The conveyor belt system of claim 1, wherein: (a) each of said pulley teeth has a pulley tooth width; (b) each of said recesses has a recess width; and (c) said pulley tooth width is less than said recess width.

3. The conveyor belt system of claim 1, wherein: (a) each of said pulley teeth has a pulley tooth height; (b) each of said belt teeth has a belt tooth height; and (c) said belt tooth height is less than said pulley tooth height.

4. The conveyor belt system of claim 1, wherein when said closed belt is not loaded, only one of said pulley teeth is in contact with one of said belt teeth.

5. The conveyor belt system of claim 1, wherein: (a) said pulley teeth have a pulley pitch; (b) said belt teeth have a belt pitch measured when said closed belt is flat; and (c) when said closed belt is not loaded said pulley pitch is greater than said belt pitch.

6. The conveyor belt system of claim 1, wherein said closed belt is made of a material having a low bacterial count.

7. The conveyor belt system of claim 1, wherein said closed belt is made of plastic.

8. The conveyor belt system of claim 1, wherein said closed belt is made of non-reinforced plastic.

Patent History
Publication number: 20060144676
Type: Application
Filed: Mar 9, 2006
Publication Date: Jul 6, 2006
Applicant: MOL BELTING COMPANY (Grand Rapids, MI)
Inventor: Edward Mol (Marne, MI)
Application Number: 11/276,659
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: 198/834.000
International Classification: B65G 23/06 (20060101);