Drag inducing armor and method of using same
A drag inducing armor includes a projectile hindering layer and a pliant layer operably associated with the projectile hindering layer to envelop a projectile that has passed through the projectile hindering layer. A drag inducing armor includes a forward face sheet, a projectile hindering layer disposed adjacent the forward face sheet, a rear face sheet, and a pliant layer disposed between the projectile hindering layer and the rear face sheet. A method for using a drag inducing armor includes providing a projectile hindering layer and a pliant layer disposed behind the projectile hindering layer, hindering a projectile with the projectile hindering layer, and enveloping the projectile after the projectile passes through the projectile hindering layer.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to armor for inhibiting the effectiveness of ballistic projectiles. In particular, the present invention relates to a drag inducing armor and a method of using the armor.
2. Description of Related Art
It is often desirable to protect vehicles, such as tanks, personnel carriers, and the like, from serious damage caused by ballistic projectiles. Accordingly, these types of vehicles are known to have armor to reduce the likelihood that such projectiles will penetrate the vehicle. If the projectiles penetrate the vehicle, the occupants of the vehicle may be injured or the vehicle's ability to operate may be impaired.
It should be noted that the thicknesses of ceramic layer 105 and ballistic fabric layer 107 are sized based upon, for example, the maximum mass and maximum velocity of an expected ballistic projectile 103. Generally, the thicknesses of ceramic layer 105 and ballistic fabric layer 107 are proportional to the mass and velocity of ballistic projectile 103. In other words, a ballistic projectile 103 having a greater mass and/or velocity will require a thicker ceramic layer 105 and/or ballistic fabric layer 107 to be halted, as compared to a ballistic projectile 103 having a lesser mass and/or velocity. Greater thicknesses of ceramic layer 105 and/or ballistic fabric layer 107 result in greater overall weight and size of armor 101.
While protecting the vehicle and its occupants is generally of primary importance, other factors may play a role in the design of armor for the vehicle. It is typically desirable for the vehicle to be as lightweight as possible. Generally, fuel consumption by the vehicle increases as its weight increases. A heavier vehicle usually requires a heavier drive train than a lighter vehicle, which further increases weight. Increased weight may also reduce the mobility of the vehicle and, thus, reduce the utility of the vehicle in evasive situations. As the weight of the vehicle's armor can contribute to the overall weight of the vehicle, it is desirable for the vehicle's armor to be as lightweight as possible. Many known armor systems, while protecting the vehicle from ballistic damage, add significant weight to the vehicle and provide little or no additional structural strength to the vehicle.
It is also not desirable for the vehicle's armor to greatly increase the overall size of the vehicle (e.g., the vehicle's height, width, length, volume, and the like). It is desirable for existing transportation equipment (e.g., trucks, trailers, aircraft, and the like) to be capable of transporting the vehicle. If the size of the vehicle is increased over previous vehicles, the existing transportation equipment may not be capable of transporting the vehicle, or the existing transportation equipment may be limited to carrying fewer vehicles per load. Moreover, if the vehicle's size is increased over previous vehicles, the vehicle may not be able to pass through existing roadway or railway tunnels.
The overall size of the vehicle may also be a factor in combat situations. Generally, smaller targets (i.e., smaller vehicles) are more difficult to hit with artillery, such as rockets, mortars, missiles, ballistic rounds, and the like. Thus, it may be desirable for the vehicle's overall size to be smaller, rather than larger, to reduce the likelihood of an artillery hit.
Cost is also typically a consideration when designing or choosing vehicle armor. Armor that uses exotic materials may be quite effective in defeating or limiting the damaging effect of ballistic projectiles but may be unaffordable.
While there are many types of armor well known in the art, considerable room for improvement remains.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThere is a need for an improved apparatus and method for hindering a projectile.
In one aspect of the present invention, a drag inducing armor is provided. The drag inducing armor includes a projectile hindering layer and a pliant layer operably associated with the projectile hindering layer to envelop a projectile that has passed through the projectile hindering layer.
In another aspect of the present invention, a drag inducing armor is provided. The drag inducing armor includes a forward face sheet, a projectile hindering layer disposed adjacent the forward face sheet, a rear face sheet, and a pliant layer disposed between the projectile hindering layer and the rear face sheet.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method for using a drag inducing armor is provided. The method includes providing a projectile hindering layer and a pliant layer disposed behind the projectile hindering layer, hindering a projectile with the projectile hindering layer, and enveloping the projectile after the projectile passes through the projectile hindering layer.
The present invention provides significant advantages, including: (1) providing an armor having less areal density than conventional armor; and (2) providing improved protection for projectile impacts at joints between armor tiles.
Additional objectives, features and advantages will be apparent in the written description which follows.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSThe novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, the invention itself, as well as, a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which the leftmost significant digit(s) in the reference numerals denote(s) the first figure in which the respective reference numerals appear, wherein:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTIllustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
The present invention represents a drag inducing armor and a method of making the armor. Generally, the drag inducing armor of the present invention provides a pliant layer that, when contacted by a projectile, envelops the projectile. As used herein, the term “pliant” means “easily bent, flexed, or twisted without breaking.” The projectile, spall fragments, and the pliant layer, urged by the projectile, exit the rear face of the drag inducing armor at a much reduced velocity, as will be discussed in greater detail below. The pliant layer and the projectile have a very large aerodynamic drag, since the pliant layer has a very large surface area as compared to the projectile. Accordingly, the velocity of the projectile is greatly reduced. Moreover, the leading surface of the pliant layer enveloping the projectile (or projectile fragments if the projectile has fragmented) is more blunt than the leading edge of the projectile or projectile fragments alone. For at least these reasons, the drag inducing armor of the present invention lessens, or in some cases eliminates, the behind-armor damage caused by the projectile.
Face sheets 203, 207 house projectile hindering layer 205 and pliant layer 209. In some embodiments, face sheets 203, 207 comprise a material such as a polymeric composite, steel, aluminum, or the like. In other embodiments, forward face sheet 203 provides additional protection from ballistic projectiles. In these embodiments, forward face sheet 203 comprises a material such as steel, tungsten, or other such protective or projectile hindering material. It should be noted that face sheets 203, 207 may comprise elements of another device or apparatus. For example, if drag inducing armor 201 is implemented on or in a vehicle, face sheets 203, 207 may comprise elements of the vehicle. In one particular implementation, rear face sheet 207 may comprise a vehicle panel, such a body panel.
Projectile hindering layer 205 comprises a material suitable for breaking, blunting, fragmenting, deforming, tipping, or otherwise hindering a ballistic projectile, as will be discussed in greater detail below. In preferred embodiments, projectile hindering layer 205 comprises at least one of a ceramic material, such as silicon carbide or silicon nitride; steel; titanium; a metal-matrix composite; a ceramic-matrix composite; or the like.
Still referring to the embodiment illustrated in
As discussed above, pliant layer 209 is incorporated into drag inducing armor 201 such that a ballistic projectile can be enveloped by pliant layer 209 and pliant layer 209 can be urged from drag inducing armor 201 by the ballistic projectile. Accordingly, pliant layer 209 is removably disposed between projectile hindering layer 205 and rear face sheet 207. Pliant layer 209 is held in place between projectile hindering layer 205 and rear face sheet 207 prior to the ballistic projectile impacting drag inducing armor 201. As will be more fully described below, pliant layer 209 is adapted to envelop the ballistic projectile and be urged from drag inducing armor 201 by the ballistic projectile.
In one embodiment, pliant layer 209 is compressively held within drag inducing armor 201 without the use of any adhesive. For example, pliant layer 209 may be compressively held in place between projectile hindering layer 205 and rear face sheet 207. Other ways of retaining pliant layer 209 in a removable configuration within drag inducing armor 201, such that a projectile may be enveloped by pliant layer 209 and may urge the projectile and pliant layer 209 from drag inducing armor 201, are within the scope of the present invention. For example, as shown in
Alternatively, pliant layer 209 is adhesively bonded to rear face 303 of projectile hindering layer 205 via an adhesive portion 309 and/or a rear portion 311 of pliant layer 209 is adhesively bonded to a forward face 305 of rear face sheet 207 via an adhesive portion 313. In either implementation illustrated in
Alternatively, as shown in
Still referring to
Referring now to
As shown in
As shown in
If, for example, plies 603, 605 each comprise separate sheet portions 609 of woven fabric, ply 603 may be positioned such that perforations 611 between sheets 609 of ply 603 are not aligned with perforations 613 between sheets 609 of ply 605. In other words, sheets 609 of ply 603 extend across at least some of perforations 613 between sheets 609 of ply 605. Such a configuration provides additional protection from projectile impacts occurring at joints 607 between tiles 601. Preferably, at least two plies, such as plies 603, 605, are used when a plurality of tiles 601 are incorporated in drag inducing armor 201.
Alternatively, as shown in
Generally, in either of the embodiments of FIGS. 6 or 7, it is generally desirable for a projectile to encounter as many sheet portions 609, 705 as possible to decrease the projectile's velocity. Moreover, it is preferable, in embodiments wherein tiles 601 comprise projectile hindering layer 205, to include at least two plies 603, 605, 701, 703 adjacent tiles 601. It should also be noted that, while sheet portions 609, 705 are illustrated herein as being rectangular, the present invention is not so limited. Rather, sheet portions 609, 705 may take on any shape, such as triangular.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below. It is apparent that an invention with significant advantages has been described and illustrated. Although the present invention is shown in a limited number of forms, it is not limited to just these forms, but is amenable to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Claims
1. A drag inducing armor, comprising:
- a projectile hindering layer; and
- a pliant layer operably associated with the projectile hindering layer to envelop a projectile that has passed through the projectile hindering layer.
2. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 1, wherein the pliant layer is affixed behind the projectile hindering layer.
3. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 1, further comprising:
- a rear face sheet, the pliant layer being disposed between the projectile hindering layer and the rear face sheet.
4. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 3, wherein the pliant layer is affixed to at least one of the projectile hindering layer and the rear face sheet.
5. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 1, further comprising:
- a forward face sheet, such that the projectile hindering layer is disposed between the forward face sheet and the pliant layer.
6. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 1, wherein the pliant layer comprises:
- a plurality of sheet portions.
7. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 6, wherein the pliant layer defines portions of reduced tensile strength between the plurality of sheet portions
8. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 6, wherein the plurality of sheet portions comprises:
- a plurality of separate sheet portions.
9. A drag inducing armor, comprising:
- a forward face sheet;
- a projectile hindering layer disposed adjacent the forward face sheet;
- a rear face sheet; and
- a pliant layer disposed between the projectile hindering layer and the rear face sheet.
10. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 9, wherein the projectile hindering layer comprises:
- at least one of a ceramic, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, steel, titanium, a metal-matrix composite, and a ceramic-matrix composite.
11. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 9, wherein the projectile hindering layer comprises:
- a plurality of tiles disposed edge-to-edge.
12. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 9, wherein the pliant layer comprises:
- one or more plies of woven fabric.
13. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 12, wherein the woven fabric comprises:
- at least one of aramid fibers, high molecular weight polyethylene fibers, and p-phenylene-2,7-benzobisoxazole fibers.
14. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 12, wherein at least one of the one or more plies of woven fabric comprises:
- a plurality of sheet portions.
15. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 9, wherein the pliant layer comprises:
- a first ply of woven fabric, comprising: a plurality of separate sheet portions disposed edge-to-edge forming joints therebetween; and
- a second ply of woven fabric, comprising: a plurality of separate sheet portions disposed edge-to-edge forming joints therebetween;
- wherein the plurality of separate sheet portions of the first ply of woven fabric extend across at least some of the joints formed by the plurality of separate sheet portions of the second ply of woven fabric.
16. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 9, wherein the pliant layer comprises:
- a first ply of woven fabric, comprising: a plurality of sheet portions separated by portions of reduced tensile strength; and
- a second ply of woven fabric, comprising: a plurality of sheet portions separated by portions of reduced tensile strength;
- wherein the plurality of sheet portions of the first ply of woven fabric extend across at least some of the portions of reduced tensile strength between the plurality of sheet portions of the second ply of woven fabric.
17. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 16, wherein the portions of reduced tensile strength of at least one of the first ply of woven fabric and the second ply of woven fabric comprise perforations.
18. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 16, wherein the woven fabric of at least one of the first ply and the second ply is woven to create the portions of reduced tensile strength.
19. The drag inducing armor, according to claim 9, wherein the forward face sheet is adapted to hinder a projectile.
20. A method for using a drag inducing armor, comprising:
- providing a projectile hindering layer and a pliant layer disposed behind the projectile hindering layer;
- hindering a projectile with the projectile hindering layer; and
- enveloping the projectile in the pliant layer after the projectile passes through the projectile hindering layer.
21. The method, according to claim 19, wherein the step of hindering the projectile comprises:
- at least one of breaking, blunting, fragmenting, deforming, and tipping the projectile.
Type: Application
Filed: Aug 2, 2005
Publication Date: Feb 8, 2007
Inventor: Roger Melin (Arlington, TX)
Application Number: 11/195,013
International Classification: F41H 5/02 (20060101);