Electronic control system and method for an auxiliary device interlock safety system
A controller, control system and method for controlling an auxiliary device comprising a wheelchair lift, ramp, or the like are provided. An exemplary embodiment of the auxiliary device controller is microprocessor-based and communicates with a vehicle's OEM controller for receiving a plurality of sensor inputs, which originate from OEM and auxiliary sensors, process the sensor inputs, and control various OEM and auxiliary systems relative to the sensor inputs to effect a number of safety interlocks. The controller may operate to coordinate various OEM and auxiliary subsystems to automate auxiliary device operation to reduce operator error.
This patent application is a continuation-in-part of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/142,712, filed May 10, 2002, now allowed, which is a continuation-in-part of International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/27102, filed Aug. 31, 2001, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/229,922, filed Sep. 1, 2000. This application also claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/520,848, filed Nov. 18, 2003.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe invention relates generally to an electronic control system. More particularly, the invention relates to an electronic control system for an auxiliary device, such as a wheelchair lift, with an interlock safety system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONIn the automotive field, the operation of major original equipment manufacturer (OEM) subsystems, such as the engine, emissions, transmission, and braking has become computerized, as have convenience-type features such as power locks, windows, sliding doors, and the like. Since these OEM subsystems are now usually controlled, either entirely or in part, by an OEM controller including a microcomputer, the vehicle may include a number of sensors that communicate with the OEM controller. Further, the microcomputer may additionally be programmed with software to operate various safety features in response to outputs from the sensors. For example, most modern vehicles are operative to sense when a driver is wearing a safety belt. If the driver does not employ their safety belt, the vehicle may provide a warning such as a visual indication (e.g., dashboard light or message), an audible indication (e.g., chime or warning sound), or other indication to notify and/or remind the noncompliant driver of the unsafe condition.
In another example, vehicles may also sense when one or more doors are open or ajar to prevent an occupant from accidentally falling out of the vehicle when it is in motion. In some instances, if an open door condition is detected by a door sensor, the OEM vehicle controller may operate to prevent the driver from shifting the stationary vehicle out of park or neutral. With ongoing attempts to make passenger vehicles safer, air bags are employed to prevent occupant injury during collisions. To this end and in a further example, crash sensors operate in a vehicle to detect the instance of a collision and communicate the crash occurrence to the OEM vehicle controller so that the controller may output a signal to deploy one or more air bags. Moreover, with the increasing availability of telematics (e.g., OnStar®), many vehicles are operative to automatically notify emergency services of a vehicle collision almost immediately upon the signal output of a crash sensor.
To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), many public and private vehicles are being equipped with auxiliary devices such as wheelchair lifts and ramps. Such auxiliary devices provide access to vehicles such as vans, busses, minivans and the like for mobility-challenged persons. Control systems for the foregoing auxiliary devices have generally relied on the assistance of the auxiliary device operators (often the vehicle driver). Unfortunately, such auxiliary device control systems have proven to be generally deficient in providing an adequate level of safety to an auxiliary device user.
Several factors have been identified which contribute to operator error: (1) the lack of familiarity with the controls, (2) the lack of standardization in the control sequence and types of controls (e.g., different controls for different lifts), and (3) the lack of operator training. In addition, even though the user of the auxiliary device may be fully visible to the operator, the operator may not be aware of the passenger's presence. This “looked but did not see” or daydreaming phenomenon is a frequent cause of motor vehicle collisions. For example, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has reported cases in which accidents occurred on vehicle wheelchair lifts when an operator accidentally tried to stow a lift with the user still on the lift platform. To this end, the NHTSA has proposed safety features known in the art as “interlocks” that are expected to help prevent the auxiliary device operator from making errors.
Additionally, lack of routine system maintenance has been cited as a cause of malfunctions of auxiliary devices. To this end, the NHTSA has proposed an “operations counter” that records each complete (i.e., through its entire range of motion) operation of the auxiliary device. The operations counter, which may provide an operator or technician with a general indication of the device's usage and/or age, is only helpful in assisting with identification of an appropriate maintenance task (e.g., preventative maintenance procedure) to be performed. For example, the auxiliary device's hydraulic system should be inspected after a predetermined number (e.g., 100) of uses.
To improve auxiliary device safety, auxiliary device controls are becoming less operator-assisted and more computerized and automated. Moreover, to enhance the safety of vehicles with installed auxiliary devices, it would be advantageous to facilitate communications between the auxiliary device's control system and the OEM controller. By communicating in this manner, the auxiliary device control system could operate to communicate with OEM subsystem elements such as sensors, switches, motors, and the like to enable a plurality of safety features and interlocks. In view of the foregoing, there exists a need for an electronic auxiliary device controller that operates to enable safety interlocks through coordination of various OEM and auxiliary subsystems, assists in system diagnostics, and indicates unsafe operating conditions such as when repair or maintenance is required, and the like.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONAn electronic controller, control system and method for controlling the operation of a vehicle auxiliary device, such as a wheelchair lift installed in a vehicle, are provided. The control system includes an electronic controller with a microprocessor or the like that operates under software control to communicate with a vehicle's OEM controller and a plurality of sensors, which may be associated with OEM and auxiliary device subsystems. The auxiliary device controller processes the sensor communications to determine the occurrence of an unsafe condition, and prevents the operation of OEM and auxiliary device subsystems relative to the sensor communications to enhance the safety of a auxiliary device user. Additionally, the auxiliary device controller operates to coordinate various OEM and auxiliary device subsystems to reduce auxiliary device operator error.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSThe present invention is described with reference to the accompanying figures and appendices, which illustrate embodiments of the present invention. However, it should be noted that the invention as disclosed in the accompanying figures and appendices is illustrated by way of example only.
FIGS. 1A-B illustrate a block diagram of an exemplary control system for operating a vehicle auxiliary device;
Referring now to the figures, and particularly
The individual enters the wheelchair lift platform 12 so that the operator may control the lift 10 to move the platform 12 up and down to transfer the individual between the ground level and the vehicle doorway D, which is known in the art as the transfer level or threshold elevation. As shown in
Referring now back to FIGS. 1A-B, a control system for an auxiliary device such as the exemplary wheelchair lift 10 of
Further, a plurality of analog sensors that provide variable, continuous outputs may provide data to the microprocessor 20 by linking the outputs of the analog sensors to an analog to digital (A/D) converter 23 that is linked with the microprocessor 20. As shown in FIGS. 1A-B, analog sensors may monitor environmental aspects of the auxiliary device (e.g., lift 10 and controller) such as voltage, current, pressure and temperature to ensure that various OEM and auxiliary device subsystems are operating within predetermined specifications or parameters. To this end, the plurality of analog sensors linked with the A/D converter 23 may include: a lift motor current sensor 230, a lift supply voltage sensor 231, a controller supply voltage sensor 232, a rollstop motor current sensor 233, a pressure transducer and a temperature sensor 236.
Moreover, microprocessor 20 is linked with the OEM vehicle controller for receiving outputs from OEM vehicle sensors and other communications between the OEM vehicle controller and OEM vehicle subsystems, among other things. To this end and as shown in
In response to the aforementioned outputs of sensors 220-229, 230-236, microprocessor 20 may output control, status, or informational signals. As shown in FIGS. 1A-B, a control output module 24 is linked to microprocessor 20 to control or actuate various subsystem elements, such as motors, pumps, valves, switches, indicators and the like. As shown, the control output module 24 may be linked or otherwise communicate with: a motor speed control 240, a hydraulic valve control 241, a system busy status indicator 242 and audio/visual alarms or indicators 243. Further, as previously mentioned, since microprocessor 20 is linked with the OEM vehicle controller via multiplex physical interface 21, the microprocessor 20 also operates to control various OEM subsystems such as motors for power sliding doors, solenoid switches and the like.
Additionally as shown in FIGS. 1A-B, microprocessor 20 is linked to a user interface module 25 that provides a user or operator with a means for interacting with the controller 100 for the purpose of receiving information from or providing inputs to the microprocessor 20. As can be appreciated, the user interface module 25 may include a graphical or alphanumeric display that provides an operator or user with status information, messages, error messages, diagnostic displays and the like as well as audible or other sensor indications relative to the status of the auxiliary device and the vehicle V. As shown, the user interface module 25 is linked with: a system status indicator 250, an interlock status indicator 251, an error message indicator 252, a diagnostic display interface 253, a cycle count indicator 254 and a service interval indicator 255. System status indicator 250 may provide a display relative to the controller or auxiliary device environment (e.g., voltages, current, etc.) and interlock status indicator 251 may provide a status display of all lift interlocks which will be discussed in further detail hereinafter. In connection with maintenance and troubleshooting of the controller and auxiliary device, the error message indicator 252 may provide a list of any and all errors detected by the controller during vehicle V and auxiliary device operation (e.g., OBDII codes or translations thereof), the diagnostic display interface 253 may provide a series of help menus such as an interactive menu-driven interface for assisting a technician or operator in troubleshooting or otherwise isolating a fault, the cycle count indicator 254 may display the number of times the auxiliary device has been used (e.g., how many complete lift cycles the lift 10 has completed) and the service interval indicator 255 may display when a predetermined maintenance task is required relative to the cycle count indicator 254, a length of time or other determining factor. Further, a service technician may be able to input information to the controller indicating that a maintenance task has been completed for record keeping. Moreover, the controller may also include a diagnostic interface such as a port or connector that allows a technician to debug the controller, troubleshoot auxiliary device subsystems and exercise auxiliary and OEM subsystem components. By connecting a laptop, dumb terminal, or the like to the diagnostic interface (e.g., an RS232, 9-pin, subminiature “D” connector with standard EIA pinout), a technician may access a menu-driven user interface or the like. Alternatively, a display such as a small LCD may be included in the interface module 25 or otherwise coupled thereto to facilitate communications with the diagnostic interface.
The controller may also include a remote receiver module 27 that is linked to the microprocessor 20 for communicating with wireless devices that cooperate with the controller to provide access to or otherwise control the vehicle V and/or auxiliary device. Remote receiver module 27 may include or otherwise be coupled with an antenna so that it is operable to receive wireless signals (e.g., RF, IR, RFID, etc.) from a remote sensor or transmitter 28. For example transmitter 28 may be a hand controller that operates the lift 10 to deploy, stow, raise and lower the platform 12 by sending wireless control signals to the microprocessor 20 via the receiver module 27. As can be appreciated, since microprocessor 20 communicates with the OEM vehicle controller, transmitter 28 may be operable to actuate OEM subsystem components such as power locks, power sliding doors, a security alarm and the like in addition to actuating auxiliary functions such as deploying, raising and lowering a lift, ramp.
As shown in FIGS. 1A-B, the controller also includes a lighting control module 26. The lighting control module 26 may operate to control a light proximate to or coupled with the auxiliary device for illuminating the auxiliary device or surrounding environment when needed or desired. As shown, the lighting control module 26 may receive an output signal from a light sensor 260 (e.g., a photodetector), which senses low ambient light conditions in the area of the auxiliary device. In response to a sensed low ambient light condition, the lighting control module 26 and microprocessor 20 are operable to output a control signal to an illumination means 261. The light enabling control signal may actuate one or more lights, such as spot or flood lights which thereby illuminate a surface or portion of the auxiliary device (e.g., platform 12) such as throughout the device's range of operation. The lights may be located in and/or on the vehicle, or on the auxiliary device (e.g., lift 10) so that there is illumination of at least 5 lm/sqft on all portions of the surface of the platform 12.
Operation of the exemplary auxiliary device embodied by the wheelchair lift 10 (
Another safety feature of controller 100 disables the lift 10 from operating if a lift user is improperly positioned on the lift platform 12 before or during a requested lift operation. Such a safety feature is known as an “interlock” in the art. As described hereinafter, the controller 100 includes and operates five interlocks, but fewer or additional interlocks may be provided. Generally, in operating an interlock, the controller 100 receives a user input requesting the activation of an auxiliary device function (e.g., raise, lower, stow, deploy), checks the outputs of one or more sensors relative to the requested function and allows or prevents the activation of the requested auxiliary device function. The controller 100 includes a first interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit stowage of the lift 10 when the platform 12 is occupied by a user or other object. If microprocessor 20 receives a user or operator request to stow the lift 10 via a remote transmitter 28 or other user control such as a hand control within the vehicle, microprocessor 20 queries or otherwise communicates with platform sensor 227 via sensor input module 22 to determine the platform occupancy state (i.e., occupied or unoccupied). Platform sensor 227 may comprise a pressure-sensitive tape or mat, infrared, ultrasonic, optical, or electric field sensing means on or near the platform 12 in order to discriminate the presence of an object thereon. Having received a lift stow request, microprocessor 20 delays action on the received request by queuing the request or the like and operates to determine the occupancy state of the platform 12. If microprocessor 20 determines that platform 12 is occupied, the microprocessor 20 may output a signal via control output module 24 to disable the lift 10. For example, the microprocessor 20 via control output module 24 may disable or de-energize a motor driving a hydraulic pump, inhibit the actuation of one or more hydraulic solenoid actuated valves 241, or the like. In addition, the microprocessor 20 may indicate an interlock state via interface module 25 and interlock status display 251, and/or actuation of an audio or visual alarm 243 via control output module 24. Upon removal of the platform object, microprocessor 20 may discontinue actuation of the alarm, and allow stowage of lift 10.
The controller 100 includes a second interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit movement of the platform 12 up or down unless the inboard rollstop 16 is deployed. When microprocessor 20 receives an operator request via remote transmitter 28 or other user control such as a hand control within the vehicle to raise or lower the platform 12, the microprocessor 20 may operate to determine the position of the inboard barrier via inboard barrier position sensor 224, and may further determine if the inboard barrier is locked in a deployed (i.e., substantially vertical) position. The inboard barrier position sensor 224 may include a cam and microswitch arrangement or the like to provide an indication of the rotational position of the inboard barrier 16, whereas the inboard barrier lock sensor 225 may include a relay actuated solenoid switch or the like. Additionally, microprocessor 20 may consider the output of lift position sensor 223 when comparing the sensed position of the inboard barrier 16 with a known safe position of the barrier 16. Moreover, to enhance the safety of the lift and prevent a lift occupant from becoming pinned between the platform 12 and vehicle V, the controller may inhibit operation of the lift 10 or provide a visual or audible warning if microprocessor 20 determines that the inboard barrier 16 is in an unlocked position via inboard barrier lock sensor 225. As described above with the first interlock, controller 100 may disable one or more hydraulic or electrical components of the wheelchair lift 10.
The controller 100 includes a third interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit deployment of the inboard rollstop 16 if an object is sensed on the rollstop 16. Since a user or mobility device may be tipped, tilted or, at worst, thrown off the lift 10 if the rollstop 16 is moving when occupied (i.e., there is an object present on the rollstop 16), it is important to check the occupancy state of the inboard rollstop 16 via an inboard barrier occupancy sensor 226. Generally, the third interlock is only applicable when the platform 12 is located at the vehicle floor level F and the rollstop 16 is in a generally horizontal, bridging orientation. If the platform 12 is at the vehicle floor elevation for transferring a user from the vehicle to the ground elevation, and the user is positioned on a portion of the platform 12 and inboard rollstop 16, microprocessor 20 operates to verify the output from the inboard barrier occupancy sensor 226 when lift lowering is requested. Thus, if the inboard barrier 16 is determined to be occupied, the microprocessor 20 may, as with the aforementioned interlocks, disable the lowering operation the lift and trigger an audio or visual warning alarm.
The controller 100 includes a fourth interlock that the controller 100 operates, which is somewhat similar to the foregoing third interlock, but is generally concerned with the occupancy state of the outboard barrier rollstop 14. Generally, the fourth interlock is only applicable when the platform 12 is located at the ground elevation and the rollstop 14 is in a generally horizontal orientation. If the platform 12 is at the ground elevation, and the outboard rollstop 14 is in a generally horizontal position, the outboard barrier 14 may become occupied (i.e., there may be an object present on the rollstop 14), prior to raising the platform 12. To prevent a user or object from being tipped off the platform onto the ground, the lift 10 may include various sensors on the platform 12 or the outboard rollstop 14 which are operable to determine the outboard rollstop position (sensor 221), the locked or unlocked state of the outboard rollstop (sensor 222), and the outboard rollstop occupancy state (sensor 220). As with operation of the aforementioned interlocks, microprocessor 20 is operable to receive and process signals from sensors 220, 221, and 222 when a platform raise operation is requested and disable the lift 10 and trigger an audio or visual warning alarm if outboard rollstop 14 is occupied or remains in a generally horizontal position after the platform 12 has been raised a very small predetermined distance (e.g., one inch) from the ground elevation. If the platform 12 has been raised slightly and the rollstop position sensor 221 or lock sensor 222 indicates that the rollstop 14 remains in a horizontal orientation, the controller 100 may operate the lift to lower the platform back to the ground.
The controller 100 includes a fifth interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit both raising and lowering movement of the platform 12 unless a wheelchair retention device, such as the outboard rollstop 14, is deployed (i.e., in a generally vertical barrier orientation). As with the second interlock discussed above, when microprocessor 20 receives an operator request via remote transmitter 28 or other wired operator control in the vehicle to raise or lower the platform 12, the microprocessor 20 may determine the position of the outboard rollstop 14 via rollstop position sensor 221, and may also determine if the outboard rollstop 14 is locked in a deployed or substantially vertical position via rollstop lock sensor 222. The rollstop position sensor 221 may include a cam and microswitch arrangement or the like to determine the rotational position of the outboard rollstop 14, whereas the rollstop lock sensor 222 may include a relay actuated solenoid switch or the like. Additionally, microprocessor 20 may consider the output of lift position sensor 223 when comparing the sensed position of the outboard rollstop 14 with a known safe position of the rollstop. Preferably, the controller 100 inhibits the platform 12 from raising more than three inches above the ground when the platform 12 is occupied and the outboard rollstop 14 is in a nondeployed (i.e., horizontal) orientation. For example, the controller, having received a raise operation request, is operative to determine if the platform 12 is occupied, the outboard rollstop 14 position, and whether the outboard rollstop 14 is locked, prior to sensing when the platform 12 has been raised three inches above the ground level or the lowest deployed platform level.
In addition to the foregoing described five interlocks that are generally concerned with providing safe operation of the auxiliary device, the controller 100 may provide other interlock-type safety features that require the controller 100 to interact, control or otherwise communicate with one or more OEM subsystems. For example, the microprocessor 20 may inhibit deployment of the lift 10 if the vehicle door is closed or not fully open. In a further example, the microprocessor 20 may prevent the user from closing the vehicle door if the lift 10 is deployed.
In addition to the aforementioned safety features, controller 100 is operable to monitor the operation of the auxiliary device to ensure that the device and its subsystems are operating consistently within predetermined operating specifications or parameters. To prevent user injury and lift damage due to undesirable stress on lift components, the controller 100 is operable to monitor lift velocity (i.e., speed) and acceleration during requested operations (e.g., stow, deploy, raise, lower). For example, throughout the range of passenger operation (i.e., occupied operation of the auxiliary device) it is important that both the vertical and horizontal velocity of the platform be less than or equal to a predetermined safe speed such as six inches per second. In a further example, during stow and deploy operations of the auxiliary device (i.e., when the auxiliary device is unoccupied), both the vertical and horizontal velocity of any portion of the lift should be less than or equal to a second safe speed that may be greater than or equal to the first safe speed, for example, twelve inches per second. Further, it is desirable that the acceleration of the auxiliary device be less than or equal to 0.3 G. To monitor the velocity and acceleration of the lift 10, various sensors may be employed, including lift motor current and voltage sensors, accelerometers, and motor shaft speed or torque sensors that may communicate with a motor speed control 240, such as a pulse width modulation (PWM) type module to effect feedback motor control. Sensors 230-234 in connection with A/D converter 233 enable microprocessor 20 to monitor and control operation of the lift 10 within such foregoing predetermined operating specifications. For example, if the lift speed or acceleration are determined to be outside of an acceptable range, microprocessor 20 may output a signal via control output module 24 to vary the output of motor control 240 or hydraulic components, such as a hydraulic valve 241. Additionally, microprocessor 20 may be operable to limit the operating noise of the lift by use of the motor control 240. Moreover, motor control 240 may effect soft starts and stops of a motor such as one used in a hydraulic power unit thereby allowing for smooth, consistent, and quiet operation of the lift 10.
In monitoring system operations, the controller 100 may advantageously assist the operator or technician if and when system malfunctions occur. User interface module 25 includes one or more status indicators 250 that displays the state of the lift 10 (e.g., on, off). The status indicator 250 may include incandescent or LED indicator lights which illuminate relative to a master on-off switch, button or the like. Further, the microprocessor 20 may illuminate the one or more status indicators 250 with varying intensities during sensed low ambient light conditions to distinguish between important and unimportant indicators. To this end, the microprocessor 20 is operable through the multiplex interface module 21 to sense when the vehicle's headlights are illuminated and in response to a user or operator illuminating the vehicle's headlights, or the vehicle light sensor 260 (e.g., photodetector) detecting a low light condition, the microprocessor 20 may illuminate one or more of indicators 250 through 255 as desired or appropriate.
User interface module 25 also includes a status indicator for the above mentioned interlocks. The interlock status indicator 251 may include one or more indicators (e.g., visual and/or audible indicators) that are actuated in response to an interlock condition. In addition, user interface module 25 includes an operations counter or cycle count indicator 254. Cycle count indicator 254 records each complete raise/lower operation of the lift 10 to provide a general indication of lift usage and remaining useful life. Relative to the cycle counter 254, the user interface module 25 may include one or more service interval indicators 225. Service interval indicator 225 may be operable to indicate one or more recommended service or maintenance items to an operator or user based on the cycle count of the lift. For example, microprocessor 20 may actuate the service interval indicator 225 via user interface module 25 when a predetermined lift count is reached or exceeded. The service interval indicator 225 may display a static message (e.g., lift service recommended), or may indicate one or more specific subsystems for which preventative maintenance is recommended (e.g., check hydraulic power unit). In addition to the foregoing, user interface module 25 may include a diagnostic display interface 253 and an error message display 252. Error message display 252 may enable an operator or user to perform basic maintenance to the lift 10, or may indicate specific faults or failures within the system that require repair or replacement by a technician. As mentioned above, the diagnostic display interface 253 may help or enable a technician to perform troubleshooting with the assistance of a menu-driven interface display or the like.
Referring now to FIGS. 3A-C, an electrical circuit schematic illustrating one exemplary embodiment of the controller of FIGS. 1A-B is shown. It will be readily understood by a person knowledgeable in the art that the illustrated components and electrical connections of FIGS. 3A-C are provided for exemplary purposes only and that other suitable components and interconnections may be provided. As can be appreciated, the controller 100 may be embodied by a “black box” that includes a number of connectors for interfacing with various OEM and auxiliary device subsystems such that the controller 100 is a “plug and play” type module. As shown in
The user interface module 25 of FIGS. 1A-B may comprise a 4×20 character LCD panel as shown in
Referring now to
The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. Exemplary embodiments of this invention are described herein. Variations of those exemplary embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Claims
1. A control system for controlling the operation of an auxiliary device installed in a vehicle, the system comprising:
- a controller communicating with a vehicle controller for monitoring and controlling operation of an auxiliary device subsystem and a vehicle subsystem; and
- a plurality of sensors communicating with the controller for providing output communications thereto, the sensors comprising vehicle sensors relative to the vehicle subsystem and auxiliary sensors relative to the auxiliary device subsystem.
2. The control system of claim 1 wherein the controller comprises a microprocessor including auxiliary device control logic to coordinate operation of the auxiliary device subsystem and vehicle subsystem relative to one or more output communications from the sensors.
3. The control system of claim 1 wherein the auxiliary device comprises a wheelchair ramp.
4. The control system of claim 1 wherein the auxiliary device comprises a wheelchair lift including a platform having inboard and outboard rollstops, wherein the rollstops are coupled with the platform at opposing ends thereof for moving between a generally vertical barrier orientation and a generally horizontal orientation.
5. The control system of claim 4 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an occupancy sensor for detecting an occupancy state of the platform and sending an output signal indicative of the occupancy state to the controller, the controller operating to inhibit stowage of the wheelchair lift if the platform is occupied.
6. The control system of claim 4 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an inboard rollstop position sensor for detecting the orientation of the inboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the orientation of the inboard rollstop to the controller, the controller operating to inhibit raising of the platform if the inboard rollstop is generally horizontal.
7. The control system of claim 4 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an outboard rollstop position sensor for detecting the orientation of the outboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the orientation of the outboard rollstop to the controller, the controller operating to inhibit movement of the platform if the outboard rollstop is generally horizontal.
8. The control system of claim 4 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an outboard rollstop occupancy sensor for detecting the occupancy state of the outboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the occupancy state of the outboard rollstop to the controller, the controller operating to inhibit movement of the outboard rollstop if the outboard rollstop is occupied.
9. The control system of claim 4 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an inboard rollstop position sensor for detecting the orientation of the inboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the orientation of the inboard rollstop to the controller, the controller operating to inhibit movement of the inboard rollstop if the inboard rollstop is occupied.
10. The control system of claim 4 wherein the plurality of sensors includes:
- a threshold occupancy sensor for detecting the occupancy state of a threshold area proximate a vehicle doorway and sending an output signal indicative of the occupancy state of the threshold area to the controller;
- a lift position sensor for detecting an elevation of the platform and sending an output signal indicative of the elevation of the platform if other than an elevation of the threshold area; and
- wherein the controller is linked with an indicator that operates to output a warning in response to the threshold occupancy sensor detecting an occupied state of the threshold area and a platform elevation other than at the vehicle threshold elevation.
11. The control system of claim 1 further comprises a lighting control module in communication with the controller that is operative to activate an illuminating means for illuminating the auxiliary device.
12. The control system of claim 4 further comprising a motor control module linked with the controller for outputting a pulse width modulated signal that controls the operation of a motor.
13. The control system of claim 12 wherein the plurality of sensors includes a speed sensor and an acceleration sensor coupled with the motor for detecting the speed and acceleration, respectively, of the wheelchair lift, the speed and acceleration sensors each sending output signals to the controller so that the controller may cooperate with the lift motor control module to vary the pulse width modulated signal for enabling speed and acceleration feedback control of the wheelchair lift.
14. The control system of claim 12 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an audio sensor for detecting a noise level relative to an operation of the wheelchair lift, the controller communicating with the motor control module to vary a speed and acceleration of the operation, thereby decreasing the noise level within the vehicle.
15. The control system of claim 4 further comprising an incremental counter linked with the controller for providing an indication of the usage of the lift, the counter incrementing relative to a full operation cycle of the lift.
16. The control system of claim 1 further comprising a user interface linked with the controller, the user interface comprising a master power control actuator operative to turn the auxiliary device on and off.
17. A method for controlling a mobility auxiliary device having an interlock that prevents an unsafe operation of the auxiliary device, the method comprising the steps of:
- receiving a user input relative to a requested operation of the mobility auxiliary device;
- delaying the requested operation of the mobility auxiliary device; and
- verifying that conditions of the interlock relative to the requested operation have been satisfied.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the verifying step comprises:
- receiving an output signal from a sensor relative to the interlock; and
- comparing the output signal with a known output signal from the sensor that is indicative of a safe operating condition.
19. The method of claim 17 further comprising the step of providing an indication of a state of the interlock.
20. The method of claim 17 further comprising the step of providing a warning that the conditions of an interlock relative to the requested operation have not been satisfied.
21. The method of claim 19 wherein the providing step comprises providing one or more of a visual warning and an audible warning if the interlock state is active.
22. A control system for controlling the operation of a mobility access device, the system comprising:
- a controller for receiving a user input relative to a requested operation of the mobility access device; and
- a plurality of sensors coupled with the mobility access device, the sensors communicating with the controller for sending output communications relative to a status of the mobility access device to the controller.
23. The control system of claim 22 wherein the mobility access device comprises a wheelchair ramp.
24. The control system of claim 22 wherein the mobility access device comprises a wheelchair lift including a platform having inboard and outboard rollstops, wherein the rollstops are coupled with the platform at opposing ends thereof for moving between a generally vertical barrier orientation and a generally horizontal orientation.
25. The control system of claim 24 further comprising an interlock communicating with the controller to prevent at least a portion of the requested operation unless one or more conditions relative to the output communications have been satisfied.
26. The control system of claim 25 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an occupancy sensor for detecting an occupancy state of the platform and sending an output signal indicative of the occupancy state to the controller, the interlock operating to inhibit stowage of the wheelchair lift if the platform is occupied.
27. The control system of claim 25 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an inboard rollstop position sensor for detecting the orientation of the inboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the orientation of the inboard rollstop to the controller, the interlock operating to inhibit raising of the platform if the inboard rollstop is generally horizontal.
28. The control system of claim 25 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an outboard rollstop position sensor for detecting the orientation of the outboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the orientation of the outboard rollstop to the controller, the interlock operating to inhibit movement of the platform if the outboard rollstop is generally horizontal.
29. The control system of claim 25 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an outboard rollstop occupancy sensor for detecting the occupancy state of the outboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the occupancy state of the outboard rollstop to the controller, the interlock operating to inhibit movement of the outboard rollstop if the outboard rollstop is occupied.
30. The control system of claim 25 wherein the plurality of sensors includes an inboard rollstop position sensor for detecting the orientation of the inboard rollstop and sending an output signal indicative of the orientation of the inboard rollstop to the controller, the interlock operating to inhibit movement of the inboard rollstop if the inboard rollstop is occupied.
31. A controller for operating a wheelchair lift installed in a vehicle, the wheelchair lift and vehicle each including subsystems having a plurality of sensors for sensing a state of the subsystems, the controller comprising:
- a control circuit having interlock logic that provides safe operation of the wheelchair lift relative to one or more states of the subsystems;
- a first interface module coupled with the control circuit for providing a plurality of output signals from the sensors to the control circuit; and
- a second interface module coupling an indicator with the control circuit for providing a wheelchair lift subsystem state.
32. The controller of claim 31 wherein the first interface module comprises:
- a communication module linked with a vehicle communication bus and operative to intercept vehicle communications between the vehicle controller and a vehicle subsystem, the communication module relaying an intercepted communication to the control circuit; and
- a sensor input module linked with a plurality of sensors coupled with the wheelchair lift subsystems.
33. The controller of claim 31 wherein the control circuit comprises a processing unit.
34. The controller of claim 33 wherein the processing unit comprises a microprocessor.
Type: Application
Filed: Nov 17, 2004
Publication Date: Apr 19, 2007
Inventors: Ronald Goodrich (Logansport, IN), Keith Heigl (Winamac, IN)
Application Number: 10/579,363
International Classification: B60P 1/00 (20060101); B65F 3/00 (20060101);