COMFORT GRIP RING
A ring with a shank and two or more sizing features. The shank defines an aperture for receiving a digit, such as a finger. The sizing features extend from the shank into the ring's aperture. The sizing features may be generally arcuate raised surfaces, humps, or bumps. The sizing features prevent a ring from undesirably turning, provide air spaces between a digit and the ring, and/or accommodate finger size fluctuations. The sizing features are spaced either equally or unequally around the ring's aperture. The sizing features may have widths that approximately match the shank's width, or widths less than the shank's width. Rings with the sizing features may be resized by polishing or grinding down the sizing features.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/748,310, filed Dec. 6, 2005 and entitled “Comfort Grip Ring”, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCEThis application is related to U.S. Design Application No. 29/244,306, entitled “Shank for Ring,” and filed on Dec. 6, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
FIELD OF INVENTIONThe present invention generally relates to jewelry, and more particularly to rings.
BACKGROUNDStandard ring shapes and sizes often do not properly fit all ring wearers because each person has a unique finger and knuckle shape and size. An improperly or non-optimally fitted ring may cause discomfort to the wearer, result in undesirable turning of the ring around the wearer's finger, or make it difficult to put on and take off the ring. Also, the size of a person's knuckle and finger varies and fluctuates over time resulting in potential fitting problems even for wearers who do not initially have fitting problems.
Various solutions have been developed to address the problems associated with improperly fitted rings. One involves resizing a ring as a wearer's finger size changes. Resizing temporarily solves the fitting issue but does not address future fluctuations in finger size, thus resulting in constant resizing of the ring. Resizing also does not address finger and knuckle size fluctuations that may occur over relatively short-time periods.
Another solution involves incorporating leaf and other springs on the ring's shank. A wearer's skin is often caught between the ring shank and the spring. Also, the spring wears out or breaks over time.
Yet another solution involves using ring shanks with levers to allow the ring to be placed on fingers with relatively large knuckles. Such a solution allows the ring to be placed on and removed from the finger but generally does not address the problems of undesirable ring turning and discomfort from finger size fluctuations.
Accordingly, what is need in the art is an improved ring.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONOne embodiment of the present invention takes the form of a ring including a shank and at least three sizing features. The shank includes a first surface defining an aperture operative to receive a digit. The at least three sizing features extend from the first surface into the digit aperture. In some embodiments, at least one of the at least three sizing features is generally arcuate shaped.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention takes the form of a decorative item for a digit including a body and at least three sizing features. The body includes an aperture defined by a first surface of the body. The aperture extends from a first exterior surface of the body to a second exterior surface of the body. The at least three sizing features are operatively associated with the body. Prior to operatively associating the at least three sizing features with the body, a select sized knuckle of a digit may be received through the aperture at a first number of rotational positions of the aperture relative to the longitudinal axis of the digit. After operatively associating the at least three sizing features with the body, the select sized knuckle may be received through the aperture at a second number of rotational positions of the aperture relative to the longitudinal axis of the digit where the first number is greater than the second number.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention takes the form of a method for resizing a ring. The method includes providing a ring having a shank and a sizing feature extending a distance into a digit aperture defined by a first surface of the shank. The method further includes reducing the distance the sizing feature extends into the digit aperture.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Described herein are various examples of rings with sizing features. The rings include an inner surface defining a digit aperture to receive a digit such as a finger. The sizing features extend into a digit aperture from this inner surface. The sizing features can make the ring more comfortable to wear, make it easier to adjust the size of the ring, and/or make it easier to place the ring on and remove the ring from a digit.
More particularly, the sizing features are the primary contact points between the ring and a digit. As the primary points of contact, the sizing features can be arranged on the ring to avoid putting pressure on the veins of a digit, thereby resulting in a ring that is more comfortable to wear. Further, as the primary points of contact, the sizing features can form an air space between the digit and the ring's inner surface by spacing this surface away from the digit. This air gap or space allows air to reach and flow past the digit where the ring resides, thereby resulting in a ring that is more comfortable to wear. The sizing features also reduce the tendency of a ring to undesirably rotate around a finger since the sizing features create multiple, positive contact points between the ring and the shaft of the finger.
The sizing features can also make a ring more comfortable to wear by accommodating finger size fluctuations. Typically, a ring with the sizing features can be comfortably worn on a range of finger sizes. For example, a size seven (7) ring with the sizing features may be comfortably worn on fingers ranging from approximately size six and one-half (6½) to size seven and one-half (7½). This finger size range of a ring with the sizing features allows for the accommodation of finger size fluctuations.
The sizing features can make it easier to change a ring's size, especially when the shank of the ring is composed of a hard material such as steel. Ring size is typically determined by the average diameter of a circular digit aperture. Table 1 below shows some typical ring sizes with corresponding average diameters expressed in units of mm. Additional ring sizing information can be found in readily available comparative ring size equivalents and fraction and millimeter conversion charts.
The sizing features extend into the digit aperture of the ring, thereby reducing the average diameter of the ring's digit aperture at certain portions. This reduction in the diametrical dimension at certain portions of the digit aperture effectively reduces a ring's size since the sizing features are the primary point of contact with the digit. The ring's size can then be increased by reducing the dimensions of (e.g., by polishing or grinding down the sizing feature) and/or removing one or more of the sizing features. In effect, the size of a ring with the sizing features can be readily increased to any ring size between the smaller “effective” ring size created by the sizing features and the “original” ring size (i.e., the ring size prior to implementing the sizing features).
When placing a ring on a digit, the ring must generally be slid over one or more knuckles, which tend to be more rigid than the fleshy portions of a digit where a ring typically resides. The relative rigidity of the knuckle compared to other areas of the digit means the knuckle may be a critical feature for sizing a digit aperture of a ring since the less rigid, more fleshy areas of the digit can more readily adapt to allow a ring that may be snug around these areas to be slid over the digit. Further, knuckles may have some diametrical dimensions that are greater than the diametrical dimensions portion of the finger where a ring is worn, especially for people who suffer from arthritis. This size differential can create problems with putting on and taking off the ring.
Specifically, for the ring to be inserted onto the shaft of the digit, the ring must have a sufficiently large digit aperture to allow the knuckle to pass through the ring's digit aperture. However, since the maximum diametrical dimension of the digit where the ring is worn usually has a smaller maximum diametrical dimension than the knuckle, a ring sized to clear the knuckle may not fit snugly on the digit of the finger, resulting in undesired rotation of the ring around the digit. On the other hand, if the digit aperture of the ring is sized to minimize turning of the ring, it may be difficult to slide the ring over the knuckle.
Knuckles are generally not circularly shaped; in other words, portions of the knuckle will tend to have a greater diametrical distance (i.e., a linear distance from one point on the knuckle to an opposing point on the knuckle) than other portions of the knuckle. Thus, only a portion of the digit aperture's perimeter needs to be sized to clear the knuckle's maximum diametrical dimension. The remaining portion of the digit aperture's perimeter may be sized smaller than the maximum diametrical dimension of the knuckle. This smaller sizing can be accomplished using the sizing features described below.
To slide a ring with the sizing features over the knuckle's larger portions, the ring is rotated around the digit so that the larger portions of the digit aperture's perimeter align axially with the portions of the knuckle with the larger diametrical dimensions. Once the ring clears the knuckle, it may be rotated to a desired rotational position on the shaft of the digit. The smaller diametrical distances for the digit aperture created by the sizing features provide a greater probability that a ring sized to clear the knuckle will have one or more points of contact on the shaft of the digit, thereby reducing the potential for the ring to rotate around the digit.
As shown in
Referring to
For shanks 105 with widths less than 3 mm, a sizing feature's width may be approximately equal to the shank's width. For shanks with widths greater than 6 mm, a sizing feature's width may be approximately one-half or less of the shank's width. Although described with specificity for shanks with certain dimensions, the widths for sizing features 155 may be any desired dimension for any sized shank 105. As shown in
Turning back to
Effectively, a ring with the sizing features 155 is more optimally designed to correspond to the shapes of fingers, which tend to be more ovoid than circular in cross-section along the digit's longitudinal axis. This more optimal design reduces the number of relative rotational positions that a ring with the sizing features 155 will readily pass over the knuckle compared to similarly sized ring (i.e., ring with similar average diameter). However, because of these reduced rotational positions, when the ring with the sizing features 155 is rotated to position where the ring will not readily pass over the knuckle and/or other portions of the digit, the sizing features 155 engage the digit thus reducing the tendency of the ring to undesirably rotate or turn around the digit. In other words, compared to a ring with a similarly sized digit aperture that does not include the sizing features 155, rings with the sizing features 155 are less likely to undesirably rotate around a digit.
More particularly, the sizing features 155 form discrete points of contact with the digit that improve the ring's grip on it, which in turn reduces the ring's tendency to rotate around the digit. The sizing features 155 may also be the primary points of contact between the ring and the shaft of the digit, thereby making the ring more comfortable to wear. More specifically, softer portions of the digit, such as the flesh, can move into the open areas between the sizing features 155 to decrease the ring's snugness on the digit without compromising the ring's grip on it. Further, air spaces may be formed between the digit and the shank 105 without the ring's grip on the digit being compromised, thus permitting air to flow between the ring and the digit. Airflow between the digit and the ring increases the ring wearer's perceived comfort.
A ring with the dimensions set forth in Table 2 will generally fit fingers with a size, as typically defined in the industry, from six and one-half (6½) to seven and one-half (7½). Other rings may have greater or lesser values for each of the dimensions indicated in Table 2 to accommodate different finger size ranges, which could span over more or less than one finger size range. Further, to create a ring that will fit a certain range of finger or toe sizes, the maximum height of the sizing features 155 may be a select percentage of the maximum diametrical distance of the digit aperture 150. The percentage may range between approximately five to twenty percent (5-20%) of the maximum diametrical distance. For example, the percentage selected for the ring with the dimensions indicated in Table 2 is approximately ten percent (10%), or about 1.8 mm.
As shown the
As also shown in
For illustrative purposes and with reference to
The shank's flatter bottom end 170 defines corners 205, 210 on the left and right sides of the shank 105. Each corner region 205, 210 includes a sizing feature 155 such as a raised surface extending into the digit aperture 150. The ring 400 further includes a pair of sizing features 155 on its upper portion 180 extending into the digit aperture 150, each sizing feature 155 approximately upwardly opposite one of the bottom sizing features 155. The sizing features 155 may be similar to those described above with respect to the ring shown in
Like the ring 400 depicted in
The sizing features 155 may be similar to those described above with respect to the ring 100 shown in
The shanks or bodies for any of the rings described above made be composed of any metal, alloy, or other material used to form shanks or bodies for jewelry including gold, silver, platinum, copper, plastic, steel, the like, and any combination thereof. Any of the gemstones described in the examples above may be any natural or man-made precious stone, semi-precious stone, or other material used with jewelry including diamonds, rubies, emeralds, sapphires, opals, pearls, aquamarines, topazes, cubic zirconia, and so on. The sizing features may be composed of virtually any material including metal, alloy, rubber, plastic, composites, or any other material that may be bonded, fastened, integrated, or otherwise connected, joined, associated, or formed with the shank.
The digit aperture defined by an inner surface of the shank may be generally a circle, an oval, or any other geometric shape sized to receive a digit. For example, an oval shaped may be useful for a finger with a generally oval shaped shaft. Further, the dimensions for the major and minor axes of the oval shaped aperture may approximately match, or be slightly greater than, the corresponding dimension dimensions of the finger. The outer surface of the shank of the ring may any desired shape, including, but not limited to, matching the shape of the sizing features 155 as shown for the ring 900 in
The sizing features 155 have been described above and illustrated or described in
As generally shown in
As generally shown in
One or more gemstones 130 may be associated with the ring by the various methods depicted in
As shown in
Once designed using CAD or other computer software, a wax sample of the ring with sizing features is created in operation 2510. The wax sample provides a relatively inexpensive way to confirm the functionally and aesthetics of the ring prior to casting a sample ring. If the wax samples fails this inspection because of functional, aesthetic or other reasons, operation 2500 may be repeated to further refine the ring. Alternatively, the dimensions may simply be adjusted without performing further design using the CAD software.
Once the wax sample is satisfactory, samples of the ring are cast and finished in operation 2520 using techniques well known in the art. The cast sample of the ring provides another opportunity to inspect the rings for visual, functional and other considerations. If the ring sample fails this inspection because of functional aesthetic or other reasons, operation 2500 may be repeated to further refine the ring. Alternatively, the dimensions may simply be adjusted without performing further design using the CAD software.
Once the cast sample is acceptable, one or more molds are created for mass production of the rings in operation 2530. The molds may be made from rubber, metal or other suitable material. The molds are used to form additional wax rings for use in mass production of the rings by method well known in the art (e.g., casting) in operation 2540. Prior to or during mass production, market testing may be done to confirm the commercial viability of the design. Although the operation for design and manufacturing a ring is described with certain specificity, some operations may be skipped or omitted, or performed in another order. For example, market testing may occur at any stage of development or production. As another example, the operation of producing a sample cast may be omitted.
All directional references (e.g., upper, lower, upward, downward, left, right, leftward, rightward, top, bottom, above, below, inner, outer, vertical, horizontal, clockwise, and counterclockwise) are only used for identification purposes to aid the reader's understanding of the example of the invention, and do not create limitations, particularly as to the position, orientation, or use of the invention unless specifically set forth in the claims. Joinder references (e.g., attached, coupled, connected, joined, and the like) are to be construed broadly and may include intermediate members between a connection of elements and relative movement between elements. As such, joinder references do not necessarily infer that two elements are directly connected and in fixed relation to each other. As used herein, “diameter” or “diametrical distance” may be the measurement between any two points on the surface of the ring defining the digit aperture, any two points on the sizing feature, or any point on a sizing feature and any point on the surface of the ring defining the digit aperture.
In some instances, components are described with reference to “ends” having a particular characteristic and/or being connected with another part. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to components which terminate immediately beyond their points of connection with other parts. Thus, the term “end” should be interpreted broadly, in a manner that includes areas adjacent, rearward, forward of, or otherwise near the terminus of a particular element, link, component, part, member or the like. In methodologies directly or indirectly set forth herein, various steps and operations are described in one possible order of operation, but those skilled in the art will recognize that steps and operations may be rearranged, replaced, or eliminated without necessarily departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative only and not limiting. Changes in detail or structure may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Claims
1. A ring for a digit comprising:
- a shank including a first surface defining an aperture operative to receive a digit; and
- at least three sizing features extending into the aperture from the first surface.
2. The ring of claim 1, wherein at least one of the at least three sizing features extends a maximum distance of no less than approximately 1.8 mm from the first surface.
3. The ring of claim 1, wherein at least one of the at least three sizing features is generally arcuate shaped.
4. The ring of claim 1, wherein each of the at least three sizing features are generally arcuate shaped.
5. The ring of claim 1, wherein the at least three sizing features are unequally spaced along the first surface.
6. The ring of claim 1, wherein the aperture has an average diameter and at least one of the at least three sizing features extends a maximum distance of no less than approximately five percent of the average diameter.
7. The ring of claim 1, wherein the shank and at least one of the at least three sizing features are composed of the same material.
8. The ring of claim 1, wherein the shank and at least one of the at least three sizing features are integrally formed.
9. A decorative item for a digit comprising:
- a body including an aperture defined by a first surface of the body and extending from a first exterior surface of the body to a second exterior surface of the body; and
- at least three sizing features operatively associated with the body;
- wherein a select sized knuckle of a digit may be received through the aperture at a first number of rotational positions of the aperture relative to the longitudinal axis of the digit prior to operatively associating each of the at least three sizing features with the body;
- the select sized knuckle may be received through the aperture at a second number of rotational positions of the aperture relative to the longitudinal axis of the digit after operatively associating each of the at least three sizing features with the body; and
- the first number is greater than the second number.
10. The ring of claim 9, wherein at least one of the at least three sizing features is generally arcuate shaped.
11. The ring of claim 9, wherein at least one of the at least three sizing features extends a maximum distance of no less than approximately 1.8 mm from the first surface.
12. The ring of claim 9, wherein the aperture has an average diameter and at least one of the at least three sizing features extends a maximum distance of no less than approximately five percent of the average diameter.
13. A method for sizing a ring comprising:
- providing a ring including a shank and a sizing feature extending a distance into a digit aperture defined by a first surface of the shank; and
- reducing the distance the sizing feature extends into the digit aperture.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the distance the sizing feature extends into the digit aperture is reduced by polishing the sizing feature.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein the shank is composed of a first material with a first hardness and the sizing features is composed a second material with a second hardness less than the first hardness.
Type: Application
Filed: Dec 6, 2006
Publication Date: Jun 21, 2007
Inventor: Thomas Kohl (Golden, CO)
Application Number: 11/567,711
International Classification: A44C 9/02 (20060101);