Mining methane, sequestering carbon dioxide and farming in oceans
The present invention is a multiple purposed system of producing methane from its hydrates and sequestering carbon dioxide into its hydrates. Methane hydrates mixed with mud, prepared with methane mining assembly 23 are brought to sea surface by a series of buckets 16 attaching to rotating chains 18. The decomposed methane is collected into the methane dome 50 and is processed into liquefied natural gas or synthetic liquid fuels. Liquid carbon dioxide is brought down through a tube 70 and a sequestering device 86 into the sea where the pressure and the temperature are adequate for carbon dioxide hydrates to form and settle down to the sea bottom. The unconverted gaseous carbon dioxide is collected into carbon dioxide dome 49 and is liquefied again for recycling. A specially designed marine plantation, comprising of plurality of planting units 352 and a fleet of seeding and harvesting boats, is employed to remove the residual carbon dioxide from the sequestering, to alleviate the global warming, to serves as an abundant source of renewable energy, and as a huge sink for carbon. In addition, it could provide a profusion of less-polluted seafood. The operations of mining methane, sequestering carbon dioxide and marine plantation are fully integrated and optimized
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/849,392 filed by the present inventor on Oct. 5, 2006.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to the using of fleets of specially designed ships and boats on: (1) mining methane from methane hydrates, (2) alleviating global warming by sequestering carbon dioxide, fast growing of vegetables, and promoting the proliferation of diatoms; (3) harvesting renewable energies from sea-growing biomass, wind, sun, and (4) producing sea foods profusely.
2. Prior Art
Human beings are suffering from: (1) the lack of cheap and convenient energy source, (2) the annually discharging of 29 billon tons of anthropologic carbon dioxide worldwide into the atmosphere to cause global warming, and (3) the insufficiency of foods to feed the poor. In the past few years, the oil price has increased threefold and it hovered between $60 and $70 a barrel for while and now it is above $70. The U.S. is consuming petroleum at the rate of around 21 million barrels a day. About 60% of them is imported, mainly from Middle East and Venezuela. Both of these regions are politically unstable. Although efforts are carried out to substitute part of it by agricultural product, alcohol, but it has many other problems.
A majority of the world's climatologists and scientists (more than two thousand strong) consider global warming real, but a minority of them still take a dubious or even opposite attitude. The situation becomes worse by the deforestation through land development and the ocean's decreasing ability to assimilate carbon dioxide. On the other hand, oceans cover more than ⅔ of the global surface, and they are virtually untapped. They may offer an excellent opportunity to alleviate the global warming problem.
In recent years, methane hydrates have been found to occur worldwide, from Japan to New Jersey and from Oregon to Costa Rica, in enormous quantities. Most experts agree that marine methane hydrates collectively harbor twice as much carbon as do all known deposits of natural gas, crude oil and coal on the earth. The energy stores in methane hydrates could be the potential fuel for our energy hungry world in the twenty first century if practical mining techniques were devised.
It is well known that carbon dioxide can react with water to form carbon dioxide hydrates. They are very stable on the sea-bed where the pressure is enormous and the temperature is close to zero. Sea bottoms may serve as inexhaustible burying grounds for anthropologic carbon dioxide, if technical and economical means could be developed.
If the area of open-sea plantation is of vast scale, oceans can be an enormous source of renewable energy and abundant sea food.
Prior arts exist for all those three categories: 1. methane from methane hydrates, 2. carbon dioxide sequestering and marine farming.
Category 1, Methane from Methane Hydrates:
U.S. Pat. No. 4,424,866 (1984) to Patrick L. McGuire taught the pumping of hot CaCl2 solution down to methane-hydrates formation to recover methane gas. It has the disadvantages of possible leaking methane into atmosphere, and the pollution of environment by using large quantity of chemical. It also incurs a high cost.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,733,573 (2004) to Lyon taught the use of acidic catalyst to speed up the reactions of decomposition of methane hydrates and the formation of carbon dioxide. It has the risks of escaping liberated methane and unconverted carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and polluting the environment by employing large quantity of acids.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,978,837 (2005) to Yemington taught the use of heat from multiple sources (including combustion in situs) to decompose methane hydrates, followed by collecting the liberated methane. The building of heat supplying device in methane-hydrate formation and methane-collecting system on top of the formation are extremely difficult, because the sites are located at least 1,500 ft. to several miles from sea-surface. There is no light and the pressure is enormously high there. It will be even more difficult when methane hydrates at one location are exhausted and relocation is needed. The high cost of heat is another problem.
US Patent Applications 20050284628 (2005) by Pfefferle teaches a method of decomposition of methane hydrates by supplying a fuel and an oxidizer to methane-hydrate deposit introducing a combustion in situs. Again, to bring fuel and oxidizer to methane-hydrate formation is difficult, and the costs of fuel and oxidizer are high.
US Patent Application 20060032637 (2006) by Ayoub et al teaches the use of hot water from neighboring aquifer to melt methane hydrates. This method has a number of difficulties including 1) the neighboring aquifer with high temperature is not easy to come by and 2) it is difficult to control the flows of aquifer water and the produced methane at the ocean bottom.
US Patent Application 20050252656 (2005) by James Q. Mcguire teaches the production of oil from oil shale and methane from methane hydrates by injecting liquefied gases to fracture the drilled hole and supplying heat. However, supplying heat into the fracture is difficult and costly.
US Patent Application 20050120878 (2005) by Leppin et al and US Patent Application 20050121200 (2005) by Alwarappa Sivaraman teach a method of using carbon dioxide to liberate methane from methane hydrates by means of so called “hydrates exchange reaction”. Gaseous carbon dioxide is injected into subterraneous methane hydrates field, as a result, the formation of carbon-dioxide hydrates liberates methane from methane hydrates. However, the exchanging reaction is rather slow. This teaching has no means to prevent the leaking of unconverted carbon dioxide and the liberated methane into the environment.
Category 2, Carbon Dioxide Sequestration
U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,611 (1994) to Tijima et al taught the fixation of carbon dioxide by bringing it down deep into the sea. It incorrectly assumed that the conversion will be complete, and the leaking of unconverted carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere will be real.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,890,497 (2005) to Rau et al taught a method of sequestering carbon dioxide by reacting dissolved carbon dioxide with carbonate. The use of large quantity of chemical may pollute the environment.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,397,553 (1995) to Spencer taught the sequestering of carbon dioxide by sub-cooling both carbon dioxide and water to form hydrates with no means to collect the un-reacted carbon dioxide.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,190,301 (2001) to Murray et al taught the embedding of solid carbon dioxide in sea-floor sediment. Although, with the help of a heavy weight, the downward speed of the torpedo-shaped solid carbon dioxide (SCD) is very fast, the temperature difference between SCD and its surrounding water near sea-surface may be close to 100° F. Such high temperature difference may melt or evaporate a part of the SCD. Thus, it will increase the cost of implementation and the risk of pollution.
US patent Application 20010002983 (2001) by Michael Markels Jr. teaches the method of sequestering of carbon dioxide with a fertilizer comprising chelated iron. It has no means provided for collecting the un-converted carbon dioxide. In addition, the use of chemicals increases the cost.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,598,407 (2003) to West et al taught the efficient injection of liquid carbon dioxide into sea, 700 meters or deeper, then it is mixed with cold marine water there. It has no provision to collect or recycle the portion that was not sequestered.
Tanaka et al (15) discussed the disposal of carbon dioxide by enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Limited number of oil wells suitable for EOR, cost of carbon dioxide transportation and leaking of carbon dioxide from the oil field, and the possibility of tragedy similar to the killing of thousands people in Cameroon some time ago, can limit the widespread use of EOR.
US Patent Application 20070028848 (2007) by Lutz teaches the method of sequestering carbon dioxide in aqueous environment. It provides no means to collect and recycle the un-sequestered carbon dioxide.
Herzog et al (3), Rau et al (4), Baes et al (5), Steinberg et al (6), Herzog (7), Morgan et al (8), Hirai et al (9), Yamasaki et al (10), Ballard et al (12), Austvik (13), and Jones et al (14, 15) have all discussed the collection and sequestering of carbon dioxide in water or oceans. However, no practical and economical approach has been suggested.
Category 3, Marine Farming
U.S. Pat. No. 5,397,553 (1955) to Spencer taught the construction of submerged platform structure for open sea farming. Despite that it is relatively transparent to the forces of waves, no other advantages with regard to farming and harvesting were mentioned. Furthermore, there is no anchor to the sea-bottom to fix the system at one place.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,872,782 (1998), U.S. Pat. No. 4,950,104 (1990), U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,585 (1999) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,325,569 (2001) to Streichenerger taught the use of artificial habitats to enhance the biological-mass production, and kelp-mussel cultivating. These operations are only limited to shallow sea-bottoms.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,309,672 (1990) to Spencer et al taught a method of submerged platform structure for open macro-algal farming. Despite that it is relatively transparent to wave motion, no other advantages with regard to farming and harvesting is were mentioned.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,056,919 (2000) to Markels taught the sequestration of carbon dioxide by photo-plankton photosynthesis. This method lacks the additional advantages enjoyed by the present invention such as the harvest of biological fuels and fish.
US Patent Application 20070028849 (2007) by Kvietelaitis teaches the use of an aquaculture device to cultivate shellfish such as mussels. It provides no means to raise fast growing plants to absorb carbon dioxide.
3. Objects and Advantages
Accordingly, besides the objects and advantages of the application of the specially designed and constructed ships and boats in mining methane, sequestering carbon dioxide and farming in oceans described in my above patent, several other objects and advantages of the present invention are:
(a) to provide a system of equipment to mine methane by bring its hydrates (mixed with mud) from sea-bed to sea-surface enabling them to decompose naturally without the use of any heat or chemical.
(b) to provide a means to collect the decomposed methane for further purification, liquefaction and refining to liquid fuels by conventional means.
(c) to provide a system for sequestering carbon dioxide by bringing it, in liquid form, down to deep enough marine water where the pressure is high enough and the temperature is low enough for the formation of carbon-dioxide hydrates, which settle down to bottom of the sea. Not any chemical is needed. This approach is much simpler and economical than prior arts.
(d) to provide a device to collect the gaseous carbon dioxide, that has not been sequestered, for recompression and recycling.
(e) to provide a marine plantation to absorb the liquid and dissolved carbon dioxide that has escaped the sequestering operation.
(f) to provide a system for cultivate fast growing vegetables, such as kelp or seaweed, which is in turn harvested as a renewable energy source.
(g) to provide a system for the production of sea food.
(h) to provide services for seeding, fertilizing and harvesting of fast growing vegetables, and sea foods.
(i) to provide services for fostering the proliferation of diatoms to absorb carbon dioxide from atmosphere. Since this operation is for the good of whole mankind, it should under the supervision of The United Nation and the latter should bear the cost.
(j) to provide a observation station to let tourists telescoping rarely-seen-new lives on deep-sea bottoms. Admission charges will deplete part of the overall cost of the whole endeavor supported by the present invention.
(k) to provide a platform for exploration of renewable energies such as wind, and solar powers.
(l) to provide a plenty of opportunity to internal mutual cooperation and optimization to minimize the overall cost and maximize the total profit of the whole endeavor supported by the present invention. It may mushroom to an important industry.
(m) to provide a new frontier of decent existence for mankind.
(n) to provide an abundant seafood supply. Many varieties of fish became scarce after many years of over fishing. The plantation units can serve as safety habitats for under-sea lives, they would be prosperous again. Since these plantation units are located far away from coast lines and river estuaries, these sea animals are much less polluted by mercury and other poisonous materials. These less polluted seafood can enrich the diets of hungry people of the world.
The further objects are to help ocean-neighboring countries such as The United States, Japan, China and Taiwan, etc., to be independent of foreign oil and lowering the world's demand of Mid-East's oil and improving peace in that region.
SUMMARYIn accordance with present invention a fleet of specially designed ships and boats is used to engage in mining methane from its hydrates, sequestering carbon dioxide and farming in oceans.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSIn the drawings, closely related figures have the same number but different alphabetic suffixes.
Scientists Roberts et al (1940), Jhaveri et al (1940), Jhaveri et al (1965) Galloway (1970), Deaton et al (1946), Mclead et al (1961), Verm (1974), De Roo et al (1983), Thakore et al (1987), Adisamito (1991), and Ballard et al (2001) have established that methane can combine with water to form methane hydrates under high pressure and low temperature.
Austvik et al (13) has studied the pressure-temperature equilibrium diagram for carbon dioxide and water system. Study results are shown in
From the above discussion, if ships can meet all the technical and managerial requirements suggested by the present invention, they can be employed to mine methane from methane hydrates, and to sequester carbon dioxide and deposit it in the ocean bottoms.
In the case of mining methane, the ships are equipped to dig loose the hydrates from the formation at the sea bottom and bring them to the surface. Being subjected to the atmospheric pressure and warmer temperature at the surface of the sea, methane hydrates decompose automatically. The ships provide a means to collect the decomposed methane effectively, preventing it from polluting the environment. No heat or chemical is needed. Any physical construction in the hydrate formation is completely avoided.
In the case of carbon dioxide sequestering, liquid carbon dioxide is pumped down marine water to a depth of 1000 ft. or more. The deeper the better. However, for economic reasons, it doesn't have to reach the bottom of the sea. Due to the fact that the density of carbon-dioxide hydrate is heavier than that of marine water, once formed, it will settled down to the bottom of sea. They stay there forever if without outside disturbance.
However, we do not expect that the sequestering reaction to reach completion. The ships have a means to collect effectively the un-reacted gaseous carbon dioxide. In addition, a system of marine plantation is provided to absorb the un-reacted liquid and dissolved carbon dioxide. Besides the prevention of escaping carbon dioxide into the environment, the plantation brings numerous other advantages, such as reaping various renewable energies and harvesting bumper crop of virtually pollution free sea food.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION B FIG. 4, FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, FIG. 7A, FIG. 7B, FIG. 8A, FIG. 8B, FIG. 8C, FIG. 8D, FIG. 8E and FIG. 12 Preferred Embodiment for the Mining of Methane A preferred embodiment of the methane mining installation of the present invention is illustrated in
Dome 50 has a cylindrical wall and a semi-spherical top. Around the wall, there are several transparent windows and about half a dozen flexible gloves 38 on the dome to allow workers outside the dome to manipulate the machinery inside the dome.
The water column formed between the water surface in the dome (the same as outside sea level) and the ship bottom 52 serves as a seal to separate pure methane from the air outside the ship. The sea surface is 51. The depth of the sea is 46. The produced methane leaving dome 50 first passes through a purifier system (not shown) mainly to remove carbon dioxide as an impurity, then it branches into liquefied natural gas plant 42 and liquid fuel synthesis plant 44.
As shown in
In order to avoid the daily tide movement to interfere with the smooth methane-mining operation, an automatic control system is designed as shown in
After the tension indicator is set on a desired value, when there is positive deviation, +e, it sends a signal to the tension controller 322, which in turn instructs the pump 146 to transfer an adequate amount of hydraulic fluid from the cylinder 140 to the reservoir 144 in order to maintain a constant tension in chain loops 18.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION C FIG. 6, FIG. 6A, FIG. 6B, FIG. 6C and FIG. 6D Preferred Embodiment for Carbon Dioxide Sequestering
The dried kelp or seaweed is stored temporarily at the rear deck of the boat.
These three operations of the present invention, namely, the mining of methane, the sequestering of carbon dioxide and the marine plantation are preferably operated interdependently. By their natures, these operations are mutually dependent on each other, both technically and economically. Comparing the complexity of technology of methane mining with that of carbon dioxide sequestering, the former is much more difficult than the latter, since the methane mining assembly has to reach to the bottom of the sea, which may be several miles deep; while the carbon dioxide sequester merely has to be brought down not much more than two thousand feet into the ocean. In addition, the technology of carbon dioxide sequestering has an enormous market already in existence. Therefore, the mining operation, especially during the development stage, may have to depend on the sequestering operation for financial viability. However, the sequestering operation depends on methane mining for cheap energy supply (in term of raw methane or synthetic fuels) to re-compress and re-liquefy the un-sequestered carbon dioxide. Without the marine plantation to absorb the residual liquid and dissolved carbon dioxide, the sequestering operation may suffer from leaking carbon dioxide back to the atmosphere and making marine water too acidic for diatoms to reduce their ability for absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The seeding-harvesting boats depend on the main or mother ship, which houses the methane mining and sequestering operations, for supply of electricity, fuel and lots other things. The main ships may offer the plantation crews room, board and entertainment. The main ship's first rated weather station and frequent contact with the coast guard may give all the workers in the three operating groups a sense of security.
The space between two groups of domes is occupied by other installations: 300 the synthetic liquid fuel plant, 302 the carbon dioxide recompression plant, 308 the natural gas liquefaction plant, and 306 the control board for the entire ship. The control board displays continuously all the important variables, such as the methane production rate, carbon dioxide sequestering rate as well as the conversion efficiency of carbon dioxide to its hydrates, etc. 310 is the living quarter for all the crew members including the plantation people.
Mining of methane from its hydrates starts with the reviewing of seismographic maps (the existing or refined ones) and work begins at a location where the methane hydrate concentration is the highest and the formation is the thickest, and the depth of the sea is the shallowest (measured by a sounder). Once the ship is on the selected location, the preparation work shall be done. As indicated by
During mining, drum 10 rotates clockwise and the rear chain loops move downward, and the forward chain loops move upward, together with the buckets hanging on them (see
In order for the mining assembly to work smoothly, the chain loops must be taut all the time. To achieve this, an automatic tension control system is introduced as shown in
During normal production, the methane collecting dome 50 is full of methane. Any minor repair and lengthening and shortening of chain loops should be done by workers outside of the dome with the help of the transparent windows 40 and the rubber gloves 38 (see
The selection of the site for carbon dioxide sequestering is not as critical as that for methane mining. Anywhere methane hydrates exist, the water will be deep enough to sequester carbon dioxide. In another words, mining of methane and sequestering carbon dioxide can be operated at the same location and from the same ship.
A cord 66 includes (1) an electric cable to supply electricity to the motors in the sequester 86, (2) a stainless steel chain to support the weight of the sequestering device 86, and (3) a concentric flexible tube 70 to transport liquid carbon dioxide to the sequestering device and to return the expanded carbon dioxide gas back to the ship for re-compression. Cord 66 may run up to two thousand feet or more long and is wound up on a hoisting drum 64 which is driven by a motor (not shown in any figure). When the drum 64 drives clockwise, it lifts up the sequestering device 86 higher, while it rotates counter-clockwise, the sequestering device will move deeper into the marine water.
At the beginning, the dome is filled with one atmospheric pressure air and crew members can work there freely to make inspection and repairs.
Before starting sequestering, air is pumped out through line 101, and the dome is filled with pure carbon dioxide from line 105 to one atmospheric pressure. Drum 64 turns counter-clockwise, unwinding cord 66 and lowering the sequestering device 86 into the sea to a required depth. Liquid carbon dioxide comes from the central space 104 of the concentric tube 70 (see
The liquid carbon dioxide, as a refrigerant, expands to a gaseous carbon dioxide in the radiator through the entrance 90 (see
Part of the un-sequestered carbon dioxide leaves the sequestering device 86 in form of gas and they bubble up underneath the ship and finally they are collected in the dome; but the remainder stays in the marine water partly as liquid and partly as soluble carbon dioxide. The unsequestered and uncollected carbon dioxide can be removed by the marine plantation or otherwise they may pose a danger of leaking as a green house gas to the environment or making marine water too acidic and harm the beneficial marine creatures, such as diatoms.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION H FIG. 9, FIG. 10A, FIG. 10B, FIG. 10 C. and FIG. 15 The Operation of Marine Plantation The marine plantation should be a well planned operation and it is scheduled well ahead so that during sequestering of carbon dioxide, the fast growing kelp or seaweed has started to grow and is ready to absorb the unconverted carbon dioxide residues. The fundamental unit of marine plantation is a plantation unit as shown by
Plantation units are served by a fleet of seeding-harvesting boats. The top view of the boat is shown in
During harvesting, the whole unit is moved into the space 178 through slot 179 by the hoist. First, the grown vegetables are harvested, then the fish are caught and are placed in the fish pond 188, and the shell fish are collected from the plastic pipes and they are stored in pond 190. The harvested plants are centrifuged in 194, and dried in 196. The dried vegetables are stored at area 198 and are later transferred to power plant to be burned to generate electricity and the ashes are leached to recover its fertilizer content. For each pan, harvesting is immediately followed by reseeding. The work starts from the top pan and ends with the bottom pan. Finally the reseeded plantation unit is removed from the circular space 178, by passing the main nylon cord through slot 179 with the help of hoist 182 to the sea.
All the boats are propelled by electric batteries which are charged from time to time at the mother ship, aiming to have a silent operation without disturbance to the living animals in the plantation community. They use gasoline propulsion only when their batteries are exhausted.
The carbon dioxide content and acidity of the marine water surrounding the marine plantation are frequently measured by the most sensitive instruments available in the market. When it is necessary, carbon dioxide is dispensed from 210, and fertilizer solution is dispensed from 212 (see
A plantation crew can help proliferating diatoms by adjusting marine water to a right acidity and supplying them with adequate nutrition such as iron. When the area of the plantation is huge, the carbon dioxide absorbed by planted vegetables and the surrounding diatoms could be colossal. At present, the diatoms absorb about one quarter of the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and the rest is taken up by land forests. The latter is diminishing in quantity due to land development. If the marine plantation suggested by the present invention were well developed, someday, the combined uptake of carbon dioxide by marine plantation and diatoms would surpass land forests as the number one carbon absorber!
Since the uptake of carbon dioxide by diatoms provides a valuable service to the whole mankind, the cost of its proliferation should be subsidized by United Nation, and likewise, this operation should be under its supervision.
In this patent application, there are several alternative embodiments:
1. The body of the collecting domes can be of any other forms than a cylinder, a square, etc. and their tops can a cones or any thing else.
2. The number of chain loops to lift methane hydrates to the sea surface can be one, two or more.
3. When no refrigeration is employed in the sequestering, there is only one ordinary tube to transfer carbon dioxide from the ship to the sequestering device.
4. All the methane collecting domes can be grouped together with only one outside wall in the shape of a circle, rectangle, square, or oval. There is no wall between individual domes.
5. The same embodiment in 4 can be applied to carbon dioxide collecting domes.
6. The number of chain loop to rotate the methane-hydrates-collecting buckets can be one or any number more than two.
Although the features in the present invention are unobvious to those who are in the trade, the development and construction of the ship for methane mining and carbon dioxide sequestering still depends upon the knowledge of conventional ship building, such as the stress analysis and the safety assessment.
The successful development and large scale implementation of methane mining from its hydrates, suggested by the present invention, has the potential of making ocean neighboring countries, such as United States of America, Japan, China, Taiwan and India, energy independent. World's decreasing dependence on Mid-East's oil could bring political stability and peace to this region.
The carbon-dioxide-sequestering technique together with the marine plantation should be first applied to coal-burning power plants and Canada's oil-sand refineries. The world's emission of carbon dioxide is about 29 billon tons annually of which about 11 billion tons are from burning coal in U.S. and China. Coal is the cheapest fuel for power generation. The world can't afford to not use it, and its use is increasing in developing countries such as China and India. The fact that extraction of petroleum from Canada's oil sand emits large quantity of carbon dioxide limits the production capacity of oil-sand petroleum to the present rate of about 2 million tons a day, the methods of the present invention could lift this restriction and the production rate of Canadian-oil-sand based petroleum could be increased to 10 times of that in a short period of time. The capturing and sequestering of carbon dioxide from those two big polluters could eliminate about 40% of total greenhouse gas emission, and it might be possible that the goal of achieving 50% reduction in the year 2050 expressed by recent G-8 Meeting in Germany could be realized decades earlier.
The marine plantation suggested by the present invention not only could prevent the marine-water pollution due to carbon-dioxide sequestering but when the operation is of a very large scale it could also produce an enormous quantity of bio-fuel and profusion of less-polluted-salt-water fish, which at present is near extinction due to over fishing. Since the job of proliferation of diatoms can be a part-time assignment for the plantation crew, its cost would be much less than that of companies undertaking it as their sole duty.
If the oceanic exploitation suggested by the present invention were well developed and widely implemented, the world's economy may switch gradually from being a petroleum based to one that is ocean based.
REFERENCES
- 1. Komai et al, Japan, Preprints Division of Fuel Chemistry, ACS National Meeting 1997, San Francisco, pp. 568-572.
- 2. Sloan, E. Dendy, Jr., “Clathrate Hydrates of Natural gases”, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
- 3. Herzog et al: “Environmental Impacts of Ocean Disposal of Carbon Dioxide”, Energy Conversions Management, Vol. 37, No. 608, pp. 99-105, 1996.
- 4. Rau et al: “Enhanced Carbonate Dissolution as a Means of Sequestering Carbon Dioxide in Ocean”, Transaction, American Geophysical Union 81 (48), 283, Nov. 28, (2000).
- 5. Baes et al, “Options for the Collection and Disposal of Carbon Dioxide”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Document ORNL-5657, published May 1980.
- 6. Steinberg et al, A System study for the Removal, Recovery and Disposal of Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuel Power Plants in the U.S.”, Proceedings of the Air Pollution Association, Annual Meeting, 78th, Vol. 3, pp. 4-24 (1985).
- 7. Herzog, “Ocean Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide—An Overview”, Fourth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, pp. 1-7, (Aug. 30-Sep. 2, 1998).
- 8. Morgan et al, “Hydrate Formation from Carbon Dioxide and Water”, Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, pp. 1448-1452 (1999).
- 9. Hirai et al, “Advanced Carbon Dioxide Dissolution Technology for Longer Term Sequestration with Minimum Biological Impacts”, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies”, Elsevier Science, Ltd, pp. 317-322 (1999).
- 10. Yamasaki et al, “A new Ocean Disposal Scenario for anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide: Carbon Dioxide Hydrate Formation in A Submerged Crystallizer and Its Disposal”, Energy, pp. 85-90, vol. 25 (2000).
- 11. Suess et al, “Flammable Ice”, Scientific America, No. 99, Vol. 281, Issue 5, pp. 76.
- 12. Ballard A. L., et al: Hydrate Phase Diagrams for Methane+Ethane+Propane Mixture, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 56 (2001), pp. 6883-6895.
- 13. Austivak et al, “Deposition of Carbon dioxide on the Seabed in the Form of Hydrates”, Energy Conversions Management, Vol. 33 (1992), No. 5-8, pp. 650-666.
- 14. Jones, Ian S. F. et al, “Enhanced Carbon Dioxide by the World's Oceans”, Energy Conversions Manage., 37 (6-8), pp. 1049-1052 (1996).
- 15. Tanaka, S., “Possible Contribution of Carbon Dioxide Flooding to Global Environment Issues, Energy Conversions Management. No. 5-8, pp. 587-593.
Claims
1.-16. (canceled)
17. A method of exploiting an ocean and its bottom, said method comprising:
- (a) mining methane from a methane hydrate formation at said ocean bottom;
- (b) combusting at least a portion of said methane to sequester carbon dioxide at said ocean bottom, and
- (c) absorbing by a marine plantation unit at least a portion of any residual carbon dioxide not sequestered.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising proliferating diatoms in ocean water of said plantation unit.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein said sequestering comprises:
- i) bringing carbon dioxide down to a depth in said ocean having a pressure high enough and a temperature low enough to convert said carbon dioxide gas to carbon dioxide hydrates;
- ii) sequestering said carbon dioxide hydrates in a sequestering region at the bottom of said ocean; and
- iii) collecting above the surface of the ocean carbon dioxide gas that has not been converted to carbon dioxide hydrates.
20. A method of mining methane from a methane-hydrate formation at an ocean bottom said method comprising:
- (a) grinding said methane-hydrates together with inert mass from said ocean bottom into a paste,
- (b) bringing the paste up to the surface of the ocean,
- (c) decomposing the methane hydrates on their way up to the ocean surface,
- (d) collecting the decomposed methane above the ocean surface.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein the paste is brought to the ocean surface in buckets hanging on moving chain loops, wherein the said chain loops are driven by sprockets on a drum.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the said drum is supported on a hydraulic system which is regulated by a tension controller.
23. The method according to claim 22, wherein vertical movement of the drum is synchronized with tide movement by an automatic stress controller.
24. The method of claim 20, wherein the said grinding is performed by a mining assembly suspended on chain loops through a pair of rollers and channel, wherein when the chain loops are rotating, the mining device continues grinding without changing its location.
25. The method of claim 21, further comprising supporting said chains, buckets, said paste by attaching buoys to said buckets.
26. The method of claim 20, wherein said decomposed methane is collected above the ocean surface into a dome.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein the dome comprises transparent windows and gloves attached to said windows to allow workers outside the dome to use, repair and adjust machinery inside the dome.
28. The method of claim 27, wherein the mining device further comprises a walking device.
29. A method of sequestering carbon dioxide at an ocean bottom, said method comprising:
- (a) bringing carbon dioxide down to a depth in an ocean, said depth having a pressure high enough and a temperature low enough to convert said carbon dioxide gas to carbon dioxide hydrates;
- (b) sequestering said carbon dioxide hydrates in a sequestering region at the ocean bottom;
- (c) collecting above the surface of the ocean carbon dioxide gas that has not been converted to carbon dioxide hydrates, and
- (d) absorbing by a marine plantation in said sequestering region at least a portion of any residual carbon dioxide not sequestered or collected.
30. The method of claim 29, further comprising dispersing liquid carbon dioxide into droplets and depositing said droplets in said sequestering region.
31. The method of claim 30, further comprising cooling said sequestering region by expanding a portion of said liquid carbon dioxide into a vapor in a radiator in contact with ocean water located at said sequestering region.
32. A method of marine farming comprising:
- (a) cultivating plants in a plantation unit in ocean water by means of a seeding and harvesting boat and its crew in said ocean above said plantation unit, and
- (b) proliferating diatoms in ocean water of said plantation unit, wherein said proliferating is by means of said seeding and harvesting boat.
33. The method of claim 32, wherein the said plantation unit comprises a plurality of planting pans.
34. The method of claim 33, wherein said planting pans are stacked vertically and connect to a cord.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein said cord is anchored to the bottom of the ocean.
36. The method of claim 32, wherein a plurality of said plantation units run from west to east to maximize sunshine exposure.
37. The method of claim 33 wherein the said planting pans further comprise fertilizer bags to increase growth of said plants.
38. The method of claim 32, further comprising harvesting said plants and centrifugally removing water from said harvested plants.
39. The method of claim 32, wherein said seeding and harvesting boat comprises an enclosure having a slot through which the plantation unit enters, and said boat further comprises a centrifuge for removing water from harvested plants.
Type: Application
Filed: Jul 9, 2007
Publication Date: Apr 17, 2008
Inventor: Shang-I Cheng (Bayville, NJ)
Application Number: 11/825,617
International Classification: E21C 50/00 (20060101);