FUEL SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR A GAS-TURBINE ENGINE

On a fuel supply system for a gas-turbine engine with a high-pressure supply line and a fuel metering unit, the fuel distribution system connected to staged or non-staged burners includes only one single fuel line (3) and the valve arrangements (7) connected to this fuel line and directly associated to individual burners (4), with the valve arrangements (7) each having several cutoff valves (8 to 10), which are—independently of each other—individually or simultaneously electrically settable to a closed or open limit position, with the cutoff valves each featuring a specific, yet different cross-sectional area. The simply designed, low-wear and low-maintenance fuel supply and distribution system, avoids coking in the one fuel line in the hot engine section, and enables a binary-coded fuel supply to the respective burner. With a sufficient number of valves in each arrangement, the fuel metering unit can be omitted.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application claims priority to German Patent Application DE102008032565.1 filed Jul. 11, 2008, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.

This invention relates to a fuel supply system for a gas-turbine engine with a high-pressure supply line, a fuel metering unit and a fuel distribution system connected to the burners, to control the fuel quantity supplied to the individual burners.

Multiple-line fuel supply systems including a high-pressure supply line, arranged in the cold section of the engine, with a fuel metering unit and a fuel staging unit are known from Specification U.S. Pat. No. 7,137,242 B2, for example. The staging unit distributes the metered fuel flow to at least one main burner line and to a pilot burner line which are arranged in the hot section of the engine and are connected to the main nozzles or the pilot nozzles, respectively, of the individual burners.

Specification U.S. Pat. No. 6,813,876 B2 describes a fuel supply system for a gas-turbine engine with a main burner fuel supply line and a pilot burner fuel supply line. A high-pressure pump delivers the fuel to the main burner and pilot burner supply lines. A throttling valve controls the fuel flow in the main burner supply line, while a metering valve controls the fuel flow in the pilot burner supply line.

The arrangement of two-part fuel line systems here provided, with supply lines separately associated to the pilot and the main nozzles of the individual burners, or even the arrangement of several supply lines for the main burners provided with control valves for variably supplying the burners with fuel, is disadvantageous in that, upon switching off certain burner groups, fuel stagnates in the temporarily deactivated lines situated in the hot section of the engine so that, due to coking of the fuel, parts of the fuel system are likely to be clogged, as a result of which precise control of the fuel supply to the individual burners or burner groups, which anyway is difficult to accomplish with the conventional, for example mechanical or pneumatic, valve actuating devices, as well as continuous, low-pollutant combustion are not ensured unless further measures for cooling the stagnant fuel in the hot section are taken which, however, entail other disadvantages, such as increased weight.

A multi-stage fuel supply system for a gas-turbine engine known from Specification U.S. Pat. No. 7,036,302 B2 includes a plurality of burners and at least first and second fuel injection circles in each burner, as well as first and second fuel nozzle valves in each burner which are controllably connected to the fuel injection circles of the respective burner. The fuel to be burned is supplied to all burners via a single fuel supply line, with the control of the valves being effected hydraulically via a signal fuel line using a differential pressure to the fuel pressure in the fuel supply line. The system described, besides being complicated, is disadvantageous in that heating of the fuel in the signal circuit will again incur the problems described in the above. Fuel supply via staging valves, which additionally are also described in detail in Specification U.S. Pat. No. 7,007,476 B2, requires high apparatus investment and has limited functionality in terms of staging.

A broad aspect of the present invention is to provide a simply designed fuel supply system for a gas-turbine engine which ensures precise, variable fuel distribution and metering to the individual, staged or non-staged, burners and, thus, stable, low-pollutant combustion, while having low-weight and small-size valves and, furthermore, requiring low maintenance and featuring a long service life.

The present invention, in its broad concept, provides a fuel distribution system associated to the plurality of burners which, in the hot engine section, includes only one fuel line (single fuel line) and, associated to each burner, a valve arrangement having several cutoff valves (pilot and/or main valves) which are—independently of each other—individually or simultaneously electrically settable to a closed or open limit position. Since the cutoff valves have a specific (constant) cross-sectional area differing from valve to valve, fuel supply is specifically—and variably—distributable to the individual burners and between the stages (pilot and main injection nozzle) of the same burner according to the on/off switching state of the cutoff valves of the valve arrangement. The electrically operated valve combination (bi-state or multi-state valves) so designed requires only little maintenance effort and is characterized by low wear, while ensuring stable combustion suited to the applicable operating and flying conditions without coking in the fuel distribution system, with the components of the distribution system having a long service life.

In development of the present invention, the electrically operated cutoff valves, which for the purpose of cooling can be circumcirculated by the fuel, are each connected to a single signal line to enable them to be actuated independently of each other. However, they are connected to a common return line, which can also be used as alternative signal line, so that the installation effort is low and also the weight can be kept small.

In development of the present invention, the valve arrangements provided for fuel distribution and/or metering can also be actuated independently of each other or in groups, with common signal or return lines being employable for functional groups of valves.

In development of the present invention, the valve arrangement includes a staging valve arrangement designed for staged burners having at least one pilot valve or main valve. According to the respective switching position (on or off) of the pilot and main valves the fuel flow is distributable between the pilot and the main injection nozzles of the staged burner. The pilot valve can here be provided such that it releases or closes a larger cross-section, while leaving open a smaller cross-section in the closed state.

In a further development of the present invention, the valve arrangement is provided as a binary distribution arrangement and, for fuel distribution to a staged burner, includes at least two pilot valves and/or at least two main valves, which are cross-sectionally dimensioned such that each valve is twice the size of the previous one. With n pilot valves or n main valves, respectively, the cross-sectional area of the nth pilot valve or main valve, respectively, is established from An=2n.A0, with A0 being the smallest cross-sectional area Amin. each. With a sufficiently large number of such binary-coded pilot and main valves, the binary distribution valve arrangement can simultaneously act as fuel metering valve arrangement for the respective, staged burners, enabling the fuel metering unit in the high-pressure supply line to be omitted and, accordingly, cost and weight of the fuel supply system to be reduced.

In a further development of the present invention, non-staged burners are provided with a binary metering valve arrangement including a plurality of cutoff valves with binary-coded cross-sectional size.

In a further development of the present invention, single (or all) cutoff valves with non-binary-coded cross-sectional sizes have two defined limit positions and one center position, enabling the number of required valves to be reduced, this being achievable by using a magnet as armature in a coil, for example.

In a further development of the present invention, single (or all) cutoff valves are designed such that in the de-energized state (failure case) either the last valve position is retained or the valve assumes a defined position.

The present invention is more fully described in light of the accompanying drawings showing exemplary embodiments. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 shows a fuel supply system for a gas-turbine engine having a fuel metering unit and staged burners with a staging valve arrangement, with the staged burners being connected to a single fuel line and including each a main injection nozzle and a pilot injection nozzle

FIG. 2 is a detailed schematic representation of the staging valve arrangement as per FIG. 1 provided upstream of a staged burner for variably setting the fuel supply,

FIG. 3 is a representation of the various switching states of the staging valve arrangement as per FIG. 2 for variable fuel supply to the pilot and the main injection nozzles,

FIG. 4 is a fuel supply system with staged burners connected to a single fuel line and with a binary distribution valve arrangement associated to each of the burners, with the distribution valve arrangement acting as fuel metering valve arrangement,

FIG. 5 is a detailed representation of the—staged—binary distribution valve arrangement provided upstream of a staged burner, and

FIG. 6 is a detailed schematic representation of a binary metering valve arrangement associated to a non-staged burner.

The fuel supply system shown in FIG. 1 includes a high-pressure supply line 1, into which a fuel metering unit 2 is incorporated and which issues into a single fuel line 3 situated in the hot engine section. Connected to the single fuel line 3 is a plurality of staged burners 4, each of which including a pilot injection nozzle 5 and a main injection nozzle 6. Associated to each such staged burner 4 is a staging valve arrangement 7 which, while being fed with the fuel supplied from the fuel metering unit 2 via the single fuel line 3, is circumcirculated by the fuel for cooling purposes and, as shown in FIG. 2, can be formed by a pilot valve 8 and a first and a second main valve 9 and 10. The pilot valve 8 and the main valves 9, 10 of the staging valve arrangement 7 are settable—preferably electro-magnetically or piezo-electrically—to a top and a bottom limit position, i.e. to an open position and a closed position, by use of signal lines 11, which are insulated against each other, and a common return line 12. In the bottom limit position of the pilot valve 8 shown in FIG. 2, only a small fuel flow cross-sectional area A1 is released to the pilot injection nozzle 5, while in the top limit position thereof a large fuel quantity flows to the pilot injection nozzle 5 via the significantly larger fuel flow cross-sectional area A0. The first and the second main valves 9 and 10 of the staging valve arrangement 7, which define an open position in the top limit position and—as shown in FIG. 2—a closed position in the bottom limit position, are related to two differently sized fuel flow cross-sectional areas A2 (small) and A3 (large).

FIG. 3 illustrates various switching states of the staging valve arrangement 7 for setting the ratio between the fuel quantity supplied to the pilot injection nozzle 5 and the fuel quantity supplied to the main injection nozzle 6. It is assumed in the following that a defined fuel flow passes through the single fuel line 3 to the staging valve arrangement 7 and, consequently, the pressure in the line changes in dependence of the switching state of the cutoff valves. With the first and second main valves 9, 10 (FIG. 3a) being closed and the pilot valve 8 being in the top limit position, a max. possible fuel flow reaches the pilot injection nozzle 5 of the burner 4 and no fuel gets to the main injection nozzle 6. According to FIG. 3b, only the second main valve 10 is in the bottom limit position, as a result of which a smaller fuel flow than in the previous switching state gets to the pilot injection nozzle 5 and, via the smaller cross-sectional area A2, a limited fuel flow to the main injection nozzle 6. In the switching state according to FIG. 3c, in which only the first main valve 9 is in the closed position, an even larger fuel quantity flows to the main injection nozzle 6, while the fuel flow to the pilot injection nozzle 5 is further reduced. According to the switching state shown in FIG. 3d, the three staging valves (cutoff valves 8, 9, 10) are in the top limit position (open position) so that the fuel volume flowing to the main injection nozzle 6 is further increased and the fuel flow to the pilot injection nozzle 5 further reduced. In the switching state according to FIG. 3e, only the pilot valve 8 is in the bottom limit position so that only a very small fuel flow gets to the pilot injection nozzle 5 via the small cross-sectional area A0, while the main injection nozzle 6 is supplied with a maximum fuel quantity.

The above described staging valve arrangement 7 for the respective burner 4, which is associated to a single fuel line 3 with upstream fuel metering unit 2, enables different ratios of the fuel quantity supplied to the pilot injection nozzle 5 and to the main injection nozzle 6 to be set via only two switching positions (top/bottom limit position) of the individual staging valves (cutoff valves). Due to the only two switching positions of the cutoff valves, the staging valve arrangement 7 has a very good zero point stability and, as simply designed and individually electrically actuatable cutoff valves are employable here, can be provided with low investment and operated with low maintenance and low wear, i.e. it will feature a long service life. Furthermore, with the cutoff valves rapidly and tightly closing in minimum time, shutdown time upon shaft failure is reduced. Since the cutoff valves are arranged in the hot section of the gas-turbine engine, heat discharge is required which, however, can be effected by circumcirculating the valves with the fuel. Since only one (single) fuel line, which is permanently flown by fuel, is provided in the hot section of the engine, clogging of this fuel line due to coking is not to be feared.

According to a second variant shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, fuel supply to the staged burner 4, i.e. to the pilot injection nozzle 5 and the main injection nozzle 6, can be solved by use of a binary distribution valve arrangement 13 which, being associated to each burner 4 and integrated in a single fuel line 3, is provided with the simply designed and controllable, low-wear and low-maintenance electrical pilot and main valves (cutoff valves) for setting the size of the fuel flow supplied to the pilot injection nozzle 5 and to the main injection nozzle 6, with these pilot and main valves being referred to in the above in connection with the staging valve arrangement 7. The binary distribution valve arrangement 13 in the embodiment exemplified in FIG. 5 includes a binary first and second pilot valve 14, 15 which release or close two different cross-sectional areas A4 and A5 to the pilot injection nozzle 5, thereby providing for a different—binary-coded—fuel supply to the pilot injection nozzle 5, actually in correspondence with the cross-sectional areas zero or A4 or A5 or A4 plus A5. In this context “binary-dimensioned” means that the ratio of the cross-sections of main valves or pilot valves, respectively, is based on 2 and allows a binary-coded fuel distribution as well as—with a plurality of binary pilot and main valves being provided and the fuel metering unit being omitted—a binary fuel metering to the pilot and to the main injection nozzle. Thus, with two cross-sectionally binary-dimensioned pilot valves A4 and A5, A5=2A4. For fuel supply to the main injection nozzle 6 of the staged burner 4, binary first to third main valves 16, 17 and 18 are provided which release or close, respectively, three differently large cross-sectional areas A6, A7 and A8. The cross-sectional areas A7 and A8 are two and four times, respectively, the size of the cross-sectional area A6, providing for a binary-coded fuel metering to the main injection nozzle 6 in accordance with the switching position of the main valves 16 to 18. Thus, with two cross-sectionally binary-dimensioned main valves A6 and A7, A7=2A6. If there were three cross-sectionally binary-dimensioned main valves, A6, A7 and A8, A8=4A6.

In a weight and cost-saving embodiment, provision of the fuel metering unit 2 is dispensable, actually if—other than in the above exemplary embodiment—a larger number n of binary main and/or pilot valves is provided. On the basis of the minimum cross-sectional area A0=Amin., the size of the other cross-sectional areas is then established from An=2n.Amin.

FIG. 6 shows yet another corresponding binary metering valve arrangement 19 with n binary valves 22, 23, 24, 25 etc. for a non-staged burner 20 with only one injection nozzle 21. A binary metering valve arrangement 19 designed with a sufficiently large number of binary valves assumes the function of the fuel metering unit 2 still required in the embodiments described in the above.

Individual valves of the valve arrangement can be actuated by impulse-width modulation, enabling the fuel to be metered on a basis of actuation time and impulse width. The cutoff valves can be designed such, that in a de-energized failure state, they either remain in a last valve position or assume a defined position.

List of Reference Numerals

1 High-pressure supply line

2 Fuel metering unit

3 Single fuel line

4 Staged burner

5 Pilot injection nozzle

6 Main injection nozzle

7 Staging valve arrangement

8 Pilot valve (cross-sectional area A0, A1)

9 First main valve (cross-sectional area A2)

10 Second main valve (cross-sectional area A3)

11 Signal lines

12 Return line

13 Binary distribution valve arrangement, staged

14 First binary pilot valve (cross-sectional area A4)

15 Second binary pilot valve (cross-sectional area A5)

16 First binary main valve (cross-sectional area A6)

17 Second binary main valve (cross-sectional area A7)

18 Third binary main valve (cross-sectional area A8)

19 Binary metering valve arrangement, non-staged

20 Non-staged burner

21 Injection nozzle of 20

22 Binary valve

23 Binary valve

24 Binary valve

25 Binary valve

Claims

1. A fuel supply system for a gas-turbine engine, comprising:

a high-pressure supply line;
a fuel distribution system connected to burners of the engine to control a fuel quantity supplied to individual burners, the fuel distribution system including a single fuel line and, directly associated with each burner, a valve arrangement having a plurality of cutoff valves which are each independently electrically actuatable to one of a closed and an open limit position, with each cutoff valve having a specific cross-sectional flow area (Ao to An) different than the other cutoff valves.

2. The fuel supply system of claim 1, and further comprising a staged valve arrangement for use with a staged burner having a pilot injection nozzle and a main injection nozzle for controllable fuel distribution, the staged valve arrangement including at least one pilot valve for releasing and stopping fuel to the pilot injection nozzle and at least one main valve for releasing and stopping fuel to the main injection nozzle, each valve having a different cross-sectional area (Ao to An).

3. The fuel supply system of claim 2, wherein the pilot valve opens and closes a primary cross-sectional area (Ao), while leaving open a smaller secondary cross-sectional area (A1<<A0) to the pilot injection nozzle in the closed state; the valve arrangement including a first main valve and a second main valve, each having a different cross-sectional area (A2, A3), such that different fuel flows reach the pilot injection nozzle depending on a completely or partly closed position of the main valves and the pilot valve, and with different fuel flows reaching the main injection nozzle depending on the closed or open position of the main valves.

4. The fuel supply system of claim 2, wherein the valve arrangement includes at least one of: at least two cross-sectionally binary-dimensioned pilot valves A4 and A5, where A5=2A4, and, at least two cross-sectionally binary-dimensioned main valves A6 and A7, where A7=2A6.

5. The fuel supply system of claim 1, wherein the valve arrangement for a non-staged burner includes a plurality of cross-sectionally (A0=Amin. to An) binary-dimensioned binary valves, whose respective cross-sectional area is An=2n. Amin.

6. The fuel supply system of claim 1, wherein the electrically actuatable cutoff valves are each connected to signal lines, individually or in groups, and, collectively or in groups, to one or several return lines, which can also be used as alternative signal lines.

7. The fuel supply system of claim 6, wherein the cutoff valves are at least one of solenoid valves and piezo-electrical valves.

8. The fuel supply system of claim 1, wherein the cutoff valves are circumcirculated by fuel flow for cooling purposes.

9. The fuel supply system of claim 1, wherein the cutoff valves are incorporated into a single fuel line.

10. The fuel supply system of claim 1, wherein the valve arrangements or groups of valve arrangements can be actuated independently of each other.

11. The fuel supply system of claim 5, wherein individual valves of the valve arrangement are actuated by impulse-width modulation, enabling the fuel to be metered on a basis of actuation time and impulse width.

12. The fuel supply system of claim 2, wherein the individual cutoff valves have two defined limit positions and one center position.

13. The fuel supply system of claim 1, wherein the cutoff valves are designed such, that in a de-energized failure state, they assume at least one of remaining in a last valve position and assuming a defined position.

Patent History
Publication number: 20100005776
Type: Application
Filed: Jul 13, 2009
Publication Date: Jan 14, 2010
Patent Grant number: 8677754
Applicant: Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (Blankenfelde-Mahlow)
Inventors: Rudolf LUECK (Nuthetal), Dominik GIUGNO (Berlin), Christian OTTERBACH (Berlin)
Application Number: 12/501,602
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Fuel (60/39.281); Plural Distinct Injectors (60/746)
International Classification: F02C 9/00 (20060101); F02C 7/22 (20060101);