ELECTRONIC CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AN AUXILIARY DEVICE INTERLOCK SAFETY SYSTEM
A controller, control system and method for controlling an auxiliary device comprising a wheelchair lift, ramp, or the like are provided. An exemplary embodiment of the auxiliary device controller is microprocessor-based and communicates with a vehicle's OEM controller for receiving a plurality of sensor inputs, which originate from OEM and auxiliary sensors, process the sensor inputs, and control various OEM and auxiliary systems relative to the sensor inputs to effect a number of safety interlocks. The controller may operate to coordinate various OEM and auxiliary subsystems to automate auxiliary device operation to reduce operator error.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/346,384, filed Dec. 30, 2008, which is a continuation U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/579,363, filed May 16, 2006, now abandoned, which is a national phase filing under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2004/038380, filed Nov. 17, 2004, and published as WO 2005/049357 on Jun. 2, 2005, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/520,848, filed Nov. 18, 2003. PCT/US2004/038380 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/142,712, filed May 10, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,825,628, which is a continuation-in-part of International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/27102, filed Aug. 31, 2001, and published as WO 2002/018172 on Mar. 7, 2002, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/229,922, filed Sep. 1, 2000. The entire contents of each of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe invention relates generally to an electronic control system. More particularly, the invention relates to an electronic control system for an auxiliary device, such as a wheelchair lift, with an interlock safety system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONIn the automotive field, the operation of major original equipment manufacturer (OEM) subsystems, such as the engine, emissions, transmission, and braking has become computerized, as have convenience-type features such as power locks, windows, sliding doors, and the like. Since these OEM subsystems are now usually controlled, either entirely or in part, by an OEM controller including a microcomputer, the vehicle may include a number of sensors that communicate with the OEM controller. Further, the microcomputer may additionally be programmed with software to operate various safety features in response to outputs from the sensors. For example, most modern vehicles are operative to sense when a driver is wearing a safety belt. If the driver does not employ their safety belt, the vehicle may provide a warning such as a visual indication (e.g., dashboard light or message), an audible indication (e.g., chime or warning sound), or other indication to notify and/or remind the noncompliant driver of the unsafe condition.
In another example, vehicles may also sense when one or more doors are open or ajar to prevent an occupant from accidentally falling out of the vehicle when it is in motion. In some instances, if an open door condition is detected by a door sensor, the OEM vehicle controller may operate to prevent the driver from shifting the stationary vehicle out of park or neutral. With ongoing attempts to make passenger vehicles safer, air bags are employed to prevent occupant injury during collisions. To this end and in a further example, crash sensors operate in a vehicle to detect the instance of a collision and communicate the crash occurrence to the OEM vehicle controller so that the controller may output a signal to deploy one or more air bags. Moreover, with the increasing availability of telematics (e.g., OnStar®), many vehicles are operative to automatically notify emergency services of a vehicle collision almost immediately upon the signal output of a crash sensor.
To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), many public and private vehicles are being equipped with auxiliary devices such as wheelchair lifts and ramps. Such auxiliary devices provide access to vehicles such as vans, busses, minivans and the like for mobility-challenged persons. Control systems for the foregoing auxiliary devices have generally relied on the assistance of the auxiliary device operators (often the vehicle driver). Unfortunately, such auxiliary device control systems have proven to be generally deficient in providing an adequate level of safety to an auxiliary device user.
Several factors have been identified which contribute to operator error: (1) the lack of familiarity with the controls, (2) the lack of standardization in the control sequence and types of controls (e.g., different controls for different lifts), and (3) the lack of operator training. In addition, even though the user of the auxiliary device may be fully visible to the operator, the operator may not be aware of the passenger's presence. This “looked but did not see” or daydreaming phenomenon is a frequent cause of motor vehicle collisions. For example, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has reported cases in which accidents occurred on vehicle wheelchair lifts when an operator accidentally tried to stow a lift with the user still on the lift platform. To this end, the NHTSA has proposed safety features known in the art as “interlocks” that are expected to help prevent the auxiliary device operator from making errors.
Additionally, lack of routine system maintenance has been cited as a cause of malfunctions of auxiliary devices. To this end, the NHTSA has proposed an “operations counter” that records each complete (i.e., through its entire range of motion) operation of the auxiliary device. The operations counter, which may provide an operator or technician with a general indication of the device's usage and/or age, is only helpful in assisting with identification of an appropriate maintenance task (e.g., preventative maintenance procedure) to be performed. For example, the auxiliary device's hydraulic system should be inspected after a predetermined number (e.g., 100) of uses.
To improve auxiliary device safety, auxiliary device controls are becoming less operator-assisted and more computerized and automated. Moreover, to enhance the safety of vehicles with installed auxiliary devices, it would be advantageous to facilitate communications between the auxiliary device's control system and the OEM controller. By communicating in this manner, the auxiliary device control system could operate to communicate with OEM subsystem elements such as sensors, switches, motors, and the like to enable a plurality of safety features and interlocks. In view of the foregoing, there exists a need for an electronic auxiliary device controller that operates to enable safety interlocks through coordination of various OEM and auxiliary subsystems, assists in system diagnostics, and indicates unsafe operating conditions such as when repair or maintenance is required, and the like.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONAn electronic controller, control system and method for controlling the operation of a vehicle auxiliary device, such as a wheelchair lift installed in a vehicle, are provided. The control system includes an electronic controller with a microprocessor or the like that operates under software control to communicate with a vehicle's OEM controller and a plurality of sensors, which may be associated with OEM and auxiliary device subsystems. The auxiliary device controller processes the sensor communications to determine the occurrence of an unsafe condition, and prevents the operation of OEM and auxiliary device subsystems relative to the sensor communications to enhance the safety of a auxiliary device user. Additionally, the auxiliary device controller operates to coordinate various OEM and auxiliary device subsystems to reduce auxiliary device operator error.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying figures and appendices, which illustrate embodiments of the present invention. However, it should be noted that the invention as disclosed in the accompanying figures and appendices is illustrated by way of example only.
Referring now to the figures, and particularly
The individual enters the wheelchair lift platform 12 so that the operator may control the lift 10 to move the platform 12 up and down to transfer the individual between the ground level and the vehicle doorway D, which is known in the art as the transfer level or threshold elevation. As shown in
Referring now back to
Further, a plurality of analog sensors that provide variable, continuous outputs may provide data to the microprocessor 20 by linking the outputs of the analog sensors to an analog to digital (A/D) converter 23 that is linked with the microprocessor 20. As shown in
Moreover, microprocessor 20 is linked with the OEM vehicle controller for receiving outputs from OEM vehicle sensors and other communications between the OEM vehicle controller and OEM vehicle subsystems, among other things. To this end and as shown in
In response to the aforementioned outputs of sensors 220-229, 230-236, microprocessor 20 may output control, status, or informational signals. As shown in
Additionally as shown in
The controller may also include a remote receiver module 27 that is linked to the microprocessor 20 for communicating with wireless devices that cooperate with the controller to provide access to or otherwise control the vehicle V and/or auxiliary device. Remote receiver module 27 may include or otherwise be coupled with an antenna so that it is operable to receive wireless signals (e.g., RF, IR, RFID, etc.) from a remote sensor or transmitter 28. For example transmitter 28 may be a hand controller that operates the lift 10 to deploy, stow, raise and lower the platform 12 by sending wireless control signals to the microprocessor 20 via the receiver module 27. As can be appreciated, since microprocessor 20 communicates with the OEM vehicle controller, transmitter 28 may be operable to actuate OEM subsystem components such as power locks, power sliding doors, a security alarm and the like in addition to actuating auxiliary functions such as deploying, raising and lowering a lift, ramp.
As shown in
Operation of the exemplary auxiliary device embodied by the wheelchair lift 10 (
Another safety feature of controller 100 disables the lift 10 from operating if a lift user is improperly positioned on the lift platform 12 before or during a requested lift operation. Such a safety feature is known as an “interlock” in the art. As described hereinafter, the controller 100 includes and operates five interlocks, but fewer or additional interlocks may be provided. Generally, in operating an interlock, the controller 100 receives a user input requesting the activation of an auxiliary device function (e.g., raise, lower, stow, deploy), checks the outputs of one or more sensors relative to the requested function and allows or prevents the activation of the requested auxiliary device function. The controller 100 includes a first interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit stowage of the lift 10 when the platform 12 is occupied by a user or other object. If microprocessor 20 receives a user or operator request to stow the lift 10 via a remote transmitter 28 or other user control such as a hand control within the vehicle, microprocessor 20 queries or otherwise communicates with platform sensor 227 via sensor input module 22 to determine the platform occupancy state (i.e., occupied or unoccupied). Platform sensor 227 may comprise a pressure-sensitive tape or mat, infrared, ultrasonic, optical, or electric field sensing means on or near the platform 12 in order to discriminate the presence of an object thereon. Having received a lift stow request, microprocessor 20 delays action on the received request by queuing the request or the like and operates to determine the occupancy state of the platform 12. If microprocessor 20 determines that platform 12 is occupied, the microprocessor 20 may output a signal via control output module 24 to disable the lift 10. For example, the microprocessor 20 via control output module 24 may disable or de-energize a motor driving a hydraulic pump, inhibit the actuation of one or more hydraulic solenoid actuated valves 241, or the like. In addition, the microprocessor 20 may indicate an interlock state via interface module 25 and interlock status display 251, and/or actuation of an audio or visual alarm 243 via control output module 24. Upon removal of the platform object, microprocessor 20 may discontinue actuation of the alarm, and allow stowage of lift 10.
The controller 100 includes a second interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit movement of the platform 12 up or down unless the inboard rollstop 16 is deployed. When microprocessor 20 receives an operator request via remote transmitter 28 or other user control such as a hand control within the vehicle to raise or lower the platform 12, the microprocessor 20 may operate to determine the position of the inboard barrier via inboard barrier position sensor 224, and may further determine if the inboard barrier is locked in a deployed (i.e., substantially vertical) position. The inboard barrier position sensor 224 may include a cam and microswitch arrangement or the like to provide an indication of the rotational position of the inboard barrier 16, whereas the inboard barrier lock sensor 225 may include a relay actuated solenoid switch or the like. Additionally, microprocessor 20 may consider the output of lift position sensor 223 when comparing the sensed position of the inboard barrier 16 with a known safe position of the barrier 16. Moreover, to enhance the safety of the lift and prevent a lift occupant from becoming pinned between the platform 12 and vehicle V, the controller may inhibit operation of the lift 10 or provide a visual or audible warning if microprocessor 20 determines that the inboard barrier 16 is in an unlocked position via inboard barrier lock sensor 225. As described above with the first interlock, controller 100 may disable one or more hydraulic or electrical components of the wheelchair lift 10.
The controller 100 includes a third interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit deployment of the inboard rollstop 16 if an object is sensed on the rollstop 16. Since a user or mobility device may be tipped, tilted or, at worst, thrown off the lift 10 if the rollstop 16 is moving when occupied (i.e., there is an object present on the rollstop 16), it is important to check the occupancy state of the inboard rollstop 16 via an inboard barrier occupancy sensor 226. Generally, the third interlock is only applicable when the platform 12 is located at the vehicle floor level F and the rollstop 16 is in a generally horizontal, bridging orientation. If the platform 12 is at the vehicle floor elevation for transferring a user from the vehicle to the ground elevation, and the user is positioned on a portion of the platform 12 and inboard rollstop 16, microprocessor 20 operates to verify the output from the inboard barrier occupancy sensor 226 when lift lowering is requested. Thus, if the inboard barrier 16 is determined to be occupied, the microprocessor 20 may, as with the aforementioned interlocks, disable the lowering operation the lift and trigger an audio or visual warning alarm.
The controller 100 includes a fourth interlock that the controller 100 operates, which is somewhat similar to the foregoing third interlock, but is generally concerned with the occupancy state of the outboard barrier rollstop 14. Generally, the fourth interlock is only applicable when the platform 12 is located at the ground elevation and the rollstop 14 is in a generally horizontal orientation. If the platform 12 is at the ground elevation, and the outboard rollstop 14 is in a generally horizontal position, the outboard barrier 14 may become occupied (i.e., there may be an object present on the rollstop 14), prior to raising the platform 12. To prevent a user or object from being tipped off the platform onto the ground, the lift 10 may include various sensors on the platform 12 or the outboard rollstop 14 which are operable to determine the outboard rollstop position (sensor 221), the locked or unlocked state of the outboard rollstop (sensor 222), and the outboard rollstop occupancy state (sensor 220). As with operation of the aforementioned interlocks, microprocessor 20 is operable to receive and process signals from sensors 220, 221, and 222 when a platform raise operation is requested and disable the lift 10 and trigger an audio or visual warning alarm if outboard rollstop 14 is occupied or remains in a generally horizontal position after the platform 12 has been raised a very small predetermined distance (e.g., one inch) from the ground elevation. If the platform 12 has been raised slightly and the rollstop position sensor 221 or lock sensor 222 indicates that the rollstop 14 remains in a horizontal orientation, the controller 100 may operate the lift to lower the platform back to the ground.
The controller 100 includes a fifth interlock that the controller 100 operates to inhibit both raising and lowering movement of the platform 12 unless a wheelchair retention device, such as the outboard rollstop 14, is deployed (i.e., in a generally vertical barrier orientation). As with the second interlock discussed above, when microprocessor 20 receives an operator request via remote transmitter 28 or other wired operator control in the vehicle to raise or lower the platform 12, the microprocessor 20 may determine the position of the outboard rollstop 14 via rollstop position sensor 221, and may also determine if the outboard rollstop 14 is locked in a deployed or substantially vertical position via rollstop lock sensor 222. The rollstop position sensor 221 may include a cam and microswitch arrangement or the like to determine the rotational position of the outboard rollstop 14, whereas the rollstop lock sensor 222 may include a relay actuated solenoid switch or the like. Additionally, microprocessor 20 may consider the output of lift position sensor 223 when comparing the sensed position of the outboard rollstop 14 with a known safe position of the rollstop. Preferably, the controller 100 inhibits the platform 12 from raising more than three inches above the ground when the platform 12 is occupied and the outboard rollstop 14 is in a nondeployed (i.e., horizontal) orientation. For example, the controller, having received a raise operation request, is operative to determine if the platform 12 is occupied, the outboard rollstop 14 position, and whether the outboard rollstop 14 is locked, prior to sensing when the platform 12 has been raised three inches above the ground level or the lowest deployed platform level.
In addition to the foregoing described five interlocks that are generally concerned with providing safe operation of the auxiliary device, the controller 100 may provide other interlock-type safety features that require the controller 100 to interact, control or otherwise communicate with one or more OEM subsystems. For example, the microprocessor 20 may inhibit deployment of the lift 10 if the vehicle door is closed or not fully open. In a further example, the microprocessor 20 may prevent the user from closing the vehicle door if the lift 10 is deployed.
In addition to the aforementioned safety features, controller 100 is operable to monitor the operation of the auxiliary device to ensure that the device and its subsystems are operating consistently within predetermined operating specifications or parameters. To prevent user injury and lift damage due to undesirable stress on lift components, the controller 100 is operable to monitor lift velocity (i.e., speed) and acceleration during requested operations (e.g., stow, deploy, raise, lower). For example, throughout the range of passenger operation (i.e., occupied operation of the auxiliary device) it is important that both the vertical and horizontal velocity of the platform be less than or equal to a predetermined safe speed such as six inches per second. In a further example, during stow and deploy operations of the auxiliary device (i.e., when the auxiliary device is unoccupied), both the vertical and horizontal velocity of any portion of the lift should be less than or equal to a second safe speed that may be greater than or equal to the first safe speed, for example, twelve inches per second. Further, it is desirable that the acceleration of the auxiliary device be less than or equal to 0.3 G. To monitor the velocity and acceleration of the lift 10, various sensors may be employed, including lift motor current and voltage sensors, accelerometers, and motor shaft speed or torque sensors that may communicate with a motor speed control 240, such as a pulse width modulation (PWM) type module to effect feedback motor control. Sensors 230-234 in connection with A/D converter 233 enable microprocessor 20 to monitor and control operation of the lift 10 within such foregoing predetermined operating specifications. For example, if the lift speed or acceleration are determined to be outside of an acceptable range, microprocessor 20 may output a signal via control output module 24 to vary the output of motor control 240 or hydraulic components, such as a hydraulic valve 241. Additionally, microprocessor 20 may be operable to limit the operating noise of the lift by use of the motor control 240. Moreover, motor control 240 may effect soft starts and stops of a motor such as one used in a hydraulic power unit thereby allowing for smooth, consistent, and quiet operation of the lift 10.
In monitoring system operations, the controller 100 may advantageously assist the operator or technician if and when system malfunctions occur. User interface module 25 includes one or more status indicators 250 that displays the state of the lift 10 (e.g., on, off). The status indicator 250 may include incandescent or LED indicator lights which illuminate relative to a master on-off switch, button or the like. Further, the microprocessor 20 may illuminate the one or more status indicators 250 with varying intensities during sensed low ambient light conditions to distinguish between important and unimportant indicators. To this end, the microprocessor 20 is operable through the multiplex interface module 21 to sense when the vehicle's headlights are illuminated and in response to a user or operator illuminating the vehicle's headlights, or the vehicle light sensor 260 (e.g., photodetector) detecting a low light condition, the microprocessor 20 may illuminate one or more of indicators 250 through 255 as desired or appropriate.
User interface module 25 also includes a status indicator for the above mentioned interlocks. The interlock status indicator 251 may include one or more indicators (e.g., visual and/or audible indicators) that are actuated in response to an interlock condition. In addition, user interface module 25 includes an operations counter or cycle count indicator 254. Cycle count indicator 254 records each complete raise/lower operation of the lift 10 to provide a general indication of lift usage and remaining useful life. Relative to the cycle counter 254, the user interface module 25 may include one or more service interval indicators 225. Service interval indicator 225 may be operable to indicate one or more recommended service or maintenance items to an operator or user based on the cycle count of the lift. For example, microprocessor 20 may actuate the service interval indicator 225 via user interface module 25 when a predetermined lift count is reached or exceeded. The service interval indicator 225 may display a static message (e.g., lift service recommended), or may indicate one or more specific subsystems for which preventative maintenance is recommended (e.g., check hydraulic power unit). In addition to the foregoing, user interface module 25 may include a diagnostic display interface 253 and an error message display 252. Error message display 252 may enable an operator or user to perform basic maintenance to the lift 10, or may indicate specific faults or failures within the system that require repair or replacement by a technician. As mentioned above, the diagnostic display interface 253 may help or enable a technician to perform troubleshooting with the assistance of a menu-driven interface display or the like.
Referring now to
The user interface module 25 of
Referring now to
The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. Exemplary embodiments of this invention are described herein. Variations of those exemplary embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Claims
1. A control system for an auxiliary vehicular access device, the control system comprising:
- a communication bus for carrying communication signals between a plurality of vehicle components;
- a vehicle controller coupled to the communication bus;
- a power sliding door subsystem operable to open and close a vehicle door in response to at least one of the communication signals;
- an access device moveable between stowed and deployed positions;
- an access controller coupled to the access device for controlling movement of the access device between the stowed and deployed positions, and coupled to the communication bus, wherein the access controller delays operation of at least one of the power sliding door subsystem and the access device until the other of the power sliding door subsystem and the access device is in an appropriate state.
2. The control system of claim 1, wherein the access controller intercepts an OEM control signal to delay operation of the power sliding door subsystem.
3. The control system of claim 2, wherein the OEM control signal is carried by the communication bus.
4. The control system of claim 1, wherein the power sliding door subsystem provides a door status output corresponding to whether the vehicle door is open or closed, and the access device provides an access device status output corresponding to whether the access device is stowed or deployed.
5. The control system of claim 4, wherein the controller processes the door status output and the access device status output to determine whether to delay operation of the power sliding door subsystem or the access device.
6. The control system of claim 5, wherein the controller processes the door status output and the access device status output in response to a request to move at least one of the door and the access device.
7. The control system of claim 6, wherein the request to move at least one of the door and the access device comprises a selected one of the communication signals carried by the communication bus.
8. The control system of claim 4, wherein the power sliding door subsystem includes a door sensor that provides the door status output, wherein the access device includes an access device sensor providing the access device status output, and wherein the door status output and the access device status output are discrete outputs communicated to the access controller via an input module.
9. The control system of claim 4, wherein in response to a request to deploy the access system, the access controller processes the door status output and if the door status output indicates that the door is closed, the access controller controls the power sliding door system via the communication bus to open the door while delaying operation of the access device.
10. The control system of claim 4, wherein in response to a request to close the vehicle door, the access controller processes the access device status output and if the access device status output indicates that the access device is deployed, the access controller stows the access device while operation of the power sliding door subsystem is delayed.
11. The control system of claim 1, wherein the communication bus operates using a communication protocol.
12. The control system of claim 1, wherein the access controller is coupled to the communication bus via a multiplexed interface module.
13. The control system of claim 1, wherein the communication signals include commands and status signals for the plurality of vehicle components, and wherein the access controller monitors the communication bus for at least one of the communication signals and interprets the at least one of the communication signals as a request to operate both the vehicle door and the access device.
14. The control system of claim 1, wherein the vehicle controller and the access controller communicate with each other and at least some of the plurality of vehicle components by sending and receiving communication signals via the communication bus.
Type: Application
Filed: Sep 20, 2010
Publication Date: Jan 13, 2011
Inventors: Ronald Goodrich (Winamac, IN), Keith Heigl (Winamac, IN), Donald S. Sturm (Dayton, OH)
Application Number: 12/886,342
International Classification: A61G 3/06 (20060101); G06F 19/00 (20060101);