Apparel Fit Guide
Each year thousands of millions of items of apparel are purchased. Within a large percentage of these transactions they are undertaken either by those for whom trying the item on prior to purchase is extremely difficult within the retail establishment or where the person they are buying for is absent. It is a common occurrence for additional time, effort and expense to be incurred taking the purchased item back to replace it or have a refund as the item does not fit as intended. by people for themselves or for others who are not present during the selection. Accordingly it would be advantageous to have a simple device to indicate the fit of items of apparel for the individual for whom the items are being purchased. Such a device is presented according to embodiments of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/250,946 entitled “Apparel Fit Guide” filed Oct. 13, 2009.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThis invention relates to apparel and more specifically establishing appropriateness of an item of apparel for an individual.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThe market for apparel in the United States in 2005 totaled approximately $174 billion in 2005. This comprising approximately $77 billion for women's apparel, $48 billion for men's apparel and $49 billion for children's clothing. Within children's apparel girl's account for 50% of the market whilst infant/toddler clothing comprised 25% and boys 25%. In men's clothing suits account for 30%, tops 20% and pants 15% whereas for women tops account for nearly 50%, pants 25% and dresses 15%. Hence, assuming an average cost of $50 per item, that represents the purchase of 3.5 billion items of apparel.
For the majority of men and women purchasing items of apparel means a trip to a store, mall or other retail establishment, perusing the racks and shelves for items of interest, trying them on, deciding whether to purchase and progressing accordingly. Hence, even in this ideal circumstance purchasing any items of apparel involves additional time, typically an hour or two, and expenditure, gas, parking, wear and tear on motor vehicle etc increasing the effective cost of the items selected. Accordingly this situation is exacerbated when the person buying the clothing is purchasing for an individual who is not present should the selected items of apparel not fit requiring the purchaser to return to the store and either exchange or recoup their money.
How can such a situation occur? One would expect the purchase to know the size of clothing for the person they are buying for as they will typically be immediate family, such as their children, spouse, partner, sister, etc or have obtained information from immediate family or friends. As such they would be seeking for example a size 6X blouse for a young girl, a size 12 dress for a female adult, a large sweater for male adult, etc and will be able to find such items within the retail environments they are searching within.
Well despite published standards for clothing in the United States these were derived from statistical data in the 1940s and 1950s and there are no Government requirements for manufacturers to follow such standards. Accordingly over the past 20 years, the North American fashion industry has manipulated clothing sizes to accommodate its growing public, especially women. For example, the waist circumference on a 1984 size 8 dress was 25 inches (64 cm). In 1995 it was 26 inches (66 cm) and in 2004 it was 27½ (70 cm), a two-and-a-half inch (6.5 cm) difference from 1984 to 2004. Meanwhile sizing standards in other parts of the world remained constant, for example by regulations wherein in Europe the newest standard is EN 13402 and includes by clothing type what body dimension shall define the size of the item.
The situation is even more complex with a retail chain offering for example standard sizes, e.g. 12 Regular, petite, e.g. 12 petite, and Plus Sized, e.g. 12 Plus. Plus sized clothing in 2006 accounted for approximately 45% of apparel sold and is anticipated to grow to about 55% by 2012. According to Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/us_standard_clothing_size) variants according to height etc for women include Misses, Miss Petite, Junior, Junior Petite, Young Junior, Women's and Half Sizes where increasing size within each type is denoted by numerical identifiers, e.g. 7, 9, 11 etc for Junior, 38, 40, 42 for women's, and 10½, 12½, 14½ etc for half sizes. Additionally many stores will use simpler sizing based upon S, M, L, and XL together with additional sizes of XXL, XXXL or 1X, 2X etc.
As a result even though the purchaser may have in their mind that their daughter is a 6X, based upon recently purchasing some apparel at Gap™ for example, clothing labeled 6X at other stores, such as for example Sears™, American Eagle™, Old Navy™ etc may be manufactured according to different sizing standards. As such purchasing items at these different stores may result in some or all of them not fitting their daughter requiring them to be returned. However, this may be repeated again if the adjusted sizes chosen by the purchaser in these stores do not match the 6X from Gap™, requiring another trip.
Naturally such return trips are a significant waste of time, resources and money. This being made even worse in situations where the purchaser is buying for someone who lives elsewhere within North America. In such situations the recipient might not have the same store in their locality, or even town making such returns extremely difficult. Potentially the store does not exist within the same state or even country.
In the above examples where the individual was at the retail establishment in the process of selecting and purchasing an item of apparel it was considered that it would be easy for them to take the item of apparel and try it on making the process less prone to error in choosing the incorrect size. However, this is not always the case as there are those with disabilities for whom such an activity at the retail establishment is not feasible. In 2007 the US Census Bureau listed at 51.2 million the number of people who have some level of recognized disability, namely 18 percent of the population of the United States. Of all people with disabilities, 32.5 million, or 12 percent of the US population, had a severe disability. This is without considering those who whilst being able bodied have some phobia or fear of undressing within a fairly public environment to try on possible items of apparel.
With the increasing penetration of the Internet then in some instances a potential buyer may go online and access the website of a retailer and seek their specific sizing guide. However, this then requires the user to print out and bring with them sizing guides for each store they may potentially wish to shop within, which is a cumbersome and laborious process. Further in many instances these guides may be unavailable even from major retailers, e.g. Nike™, or wherein retailers carry multiple manufacturers, such as Sears™ for example, or the particular selection varies frequently, e.g. end-of-line retailing clearance houses such as Winners™.
As such in a very high percentage of instances of an individual purchasing an item of apparel it would be beneficial for them to possess a guide to determining whether a particular item of clothing will either fit them or if being sized large enough to fit them has the desired fit, such as for example slim, regular or relaxed. It would be further beneficial if the guide was derived from a simple measurement of the individual, was simple to use allowing those with infirmities or visual impediments or elderly to utilize it, and inexpensive such that it can be widely employed and replaced in the event of loss as will naturally occur when such a tool is used within environments with clothes being tried on/off, moving around retail establishments etc. Further low cost benefiting low income families where a family may require three, four, or more guides to cover all family members.
Accordingly it is therefore desirable to provide an easy to use guide for the selection of clothing for individuals. It would also be desirable for the guide to be simple for those suffering handicaps or disabilities to use.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONIt is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate at least one disadvantage of the prior art.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention there is provided a guide having at least a first end and at least a first predetermined region of a plurality of predetermined regions, each predetermined region being indicative of a measure of fit for an item of apparel with respect to a user and disposed in a predetermined location with respect to the first end of the device.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention there is provided a method comprising providing a guide having at least a first end and at least a first predetermined region of a plurality of predetermined regions, each predetermined region being indicative of a measure of fit for an item of apparel with respect to a user and disposed in a predetermined location with respect to the first end of the device.
Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the attached Figures, wherein:
The present invention is directed to a method of sizing an item of apparel for purchase or selection without requiring the individual to either to be present during the purchase/selection or try on the item of apparel.
Reference may be made below to specific elements, numbered in accordance with the attached figures. The discussion below should be taken to be exemplary in nature, and not as limiting of the scope of the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined in the claims, and should not be considered as limited by the implementation details described below, which as one skilled in the art will appreciate, can be modified by replacing elements with equivalent functional elements.
Referring to
Now considering published measurements for a size 14 pair of jeans then we see that the waist measurement ranges from 31 inches (Artik™, Oakley™) to 36.5 inches (Liz Claiborne™) and the hip ranges from 42 inches (Oakley™) to 44 inches (Roots). Again we find that not only does a single dimension, i.e. waist, vary substantially between different manufacturers and retailers but also that within each garment there is a variation in sizing, as shown by the waist-hip difference.
Now referring to
Referring to
The fit of apparel is shown in
Similarly, with pants there are shown varying fits, being form fitting pants 510B, slim fit pants 520B, regular fit pants 530B, and relaxed fit pants 540B, wherein there are varying gaps between the wearers body and the item apparel at their hips, being first to fourth hip gaps 515A through 545A respectively and first to fourth knee gaps 515B through 545B respectively. Other aspects of fit may also vary, as indicated by the silhouettes of the clothing against the body within
Referring to
Now referring to
Referring to
Now referring to
It would be apparent to one skilled in the art that additional measurements could be taken for an individual including but not limited to neck, waist, thigh etc. Further it would be apparent that as the measurements made on the individual are established from a determination of a periphery of a body portion and simply halving the device making the determination that the device making the determination does not have to have any marking, numbering, pattern or other artifact. Also it would be evident to one skilled in the art that the device may accordingly be formed from a variety of materials including but not limited string, fabric, rope, paper, wire etc.
Referring to
In the second stage of the process the helper takes the guide to a retail establishment and looks for an item of clothing for the individual. At step 1040 a selected item is removed from a rack (or shelf/display area) and then in step 1045 is laid flat, such that the garment is presented with half the material at the back and half at the front. Then in step 1050 the guide is laid across the garment. At step 1055 the appropriate marker, i.e. “H” or “B” is placed to the left edge of the garment. At step 1060 the measurement device is laid across the garment and the helper looks at where the right edge of the garment and in step 1065 the individual looks at whether that edge sits within the band on the measurement device that has the desired fit for the individual. At step 1070 a decision is made as to whether the garment is acceptable. If the decision is no then the process moves to step 1075 and the garment is replaced and the process returns to step 1040 with the selection of another item of clothing. If the decision is yes then the process moves forward to step 1080 and the helper purchases the garment. Next in step 1085 the helper determines whether more apparel is to be tried and/or purchased. If the decision is that more clothing will be tried then the process moves to step 1040 and continues. If the decision is no then the process moves to step 1090 and terminates.
It would be evident to one skilled in the art that the measurement device may be formed as a single entity rather than as presented supra in
Whilst the embodiment described supra in respect of
Referring to
It would be evident to one skilled in the art that the guide may include more fit guides, such as fit guides 1130 through 1145 or may include fewer fit guides. Optionally the fit guide may be created for different population groups, such as men, women, boys, girls etc as well as to reflect ethnic or other preferences. It would also be apparent that the categories may be further divided, for example with women to reflect for example Misses, Miss Petite, Junior, Junior Petite, Young Junior, and Women's as discussed supra. Similarly the markings to denote particular fits and the nomenclature used may be varied according to sex, language, ethnicity, or other factors according to the target population base. Optionally the guide may be branded by a particular clothing manufacturer, retail store or other organization.
Now referring to
Referring to
Now referring to
Referring to
Similarly, visual guide 1350 contains apparel identifier 1355, being “top” and text for the four regions 1360 through 1375 respectively, being again tight, slim, norm(al) and relax(ed). In contrast to back portion 1150 of the fit guide presented supra in respect of
Referring to
Now referring to
It would be apparent to one of skill in the art that each of the tape 1530A and guide 1530B portions may be varied according to the embodiments taught supra as well as others that do not depart from the scope of the invention.
The above-described embodiments of the present invention are intended to be examples only. Alterations, modifications and variations may be effected to the particular embodiments by those of skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined solely by the claims appended hereto.
Claims
1. A device comprising:
- a guide having at least a first end and at least a first predetermined region of a plurality of predetermined regions, each predetermined region being indicative of a measure of fit for an item of apparel with respect to a user and disposed in a predetermined location with respect to the first end of the device.
2. A device according to claim 1 further comprising:
- a tape comprising at least an end, a distal end, and a marking disposed relative to the first end indicative of a measurement of a predetermined region of the user.
3. A device according to claim 1 wherein,
- the indication of fit for a predetermined region of the plurality of predetermined regions is provided by at least one of a marking indicative of dimension, a marking not indicative of dimension, a marking providing reference to a standard, an alphanumeric character, a marking providing reference to a predetermined fit, and a marking providing reference to a predetermined reference of a manufacturer.
4. A device according to claim 2 wherein,
- a user may make a determination of a fit for an item of apparel by using the guide and the tape in a predetermined relationship with respect to one another in combination with an aspect of the item of apparel.
5. A device according to claim 1 wherein,
- a predetermined region comprises at least one of an alphanumeric character, a Braille character, a pattern, a colour, a marking, and a surface texture.
6. A device according to claim 2 wherein,
- the tape is at least one of absent markings indicative of dimension and possessing marking indicative of dimension.
7. A device according to claim 2 wherein,
- the tape is at least one of integral to the guide, demountably attachable to the guide, and attachable to the guide.
8. A device according to claim 1 wherein,
- the plurality of predetermined regions comprise a first guide of a plurality of guides, each guide relating to a different type of apparel wherein the predetermined regions within each guide of the plurality of guides are related to that type of apparel.
9. A device according to claim 1 wherein,
- the guide is made from at least a first material of a group of materials, the first material being selected from the group comprising paper, cardboard, plastic, metal, glass, ceramic, string, rope, wire, and an organic material.
10. A device according to claim 2 wherein,
- the tape is made from at least a first material of a group of materials, the first material being selected from the group comprising paper, cardboard, plastic, metal, glass, ceramic, string, rope, wire, and an organic material.
11. A method comprising:
- providing a guide having at least a first end and at least a first predetermined region of a plurality of predetermined regions, each predetermined region being indicative of a measure of fit for an item of apparel with respect to a user and disposed in a predetermined location with respect to the first end of the device.
12. A method according to claim 11 further comprising:
- providing a tape comprising at least an end, a distal end, and a marking disposed relative to the first end indicative of a measurement of a predetermined region of the user.
13. A method according to claim 11 wherein,
- providing the indication of fit for a predetermined region of the plurality of predetermined regions is provided by at least one of a marking indicative of dimension, a marking not indicative of dimension, a marking providing reference to a standard, an alphanumeric character, a marking providing reference to a predetermined fit, and a marking providing reference to a predetermined reference of a manufacturer.
14. A method according to claim 12 wherein,
- a user may make a determination of a fit for an item of apparel by using the guide and the tape in a predetermined relationship with respect to one another in combination with an aspect of the item of apparel.
15. A method according to claim 11 wherein,
- a predetermined region comprises at least one of an alphanumeric character, a Braille character, a pattern, a colour, a marking, and a surface texture.
16. A method according to claim 12 wherein,
- the tape is at least one of absent markings indicative of dimension, possessing marking indicative of dimension,
17. A method according to claim 12 wherein,
- the tape is at least one of integral to the guide, demountably attachable to the guide, and attachable to the guide.
18. A method according to claim 11 wherein,
- the plurality of predetermined regions comprise a first guide of a plurality of guides, each guide relating to a different type of apparel wherein the predetermined regions within each guide of the plurality of guides are related to that type of apparel.
19. A method according to claim 11 wherein,
- the guide is made from at least a first material of a group of materials, the first material being selected from the group comprising paper, cardboard, plastic, metal, glass, ceramic, string, rope, wire, and an organic material.
20. A method according to claim 12 wherein,
- the tape is made from at least a first material of a group of materials, the first material being selected from the group comprising paper, cardboard, plastic, metal, glass, ceramic, string, rope, wire, and an organic material.
Type: Application
Filed: Oct 13, 2010
Publication Date: Apr 14, 2011
Inventor: Elsa Hopman (Grimsby)
Application Number: 12/903,253
International Classification: A41H 1/02 (20060101);