HYDROGEN FATIGUE RESISTANT FERRITIC STEEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
A ferritic steel having tensile properties and fatigue properties capable of withstanding use in a hydrogen environment and a method of manufacture thereof are provided. By adding one or more element selected from among vanadium (V), titanium (Ti) and niobium (Nb) so that the steel includes, together with at least ferrite grains in the structure, a carbide or carbides of one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb, the reduction of area and the fatigue crack propagation rate of the ferritic steel in a hydrogen environment are improved. The advantages of the invention were confirmed in cases where the ferrite grains are small grains of 1 μm or less in size, and in cases where the ferrite grains are coarse grains from several micrometers to 20 μm in size, and moreover in cases where the ferrite grains are coarse grains from several micrometers to 60 μm in size.
Latest National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Patents:
- FLEXIBLE SENSOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FLEXIBLE SENSOR
- INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, HYDROGEN PRODUCTION SYSTEM, POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, OPERATION PLAN CREATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
- Method for manufacturing hydrocarbon compound from carbon dioxide at concentrations including low concentration range
- HIGH-PRESSURE HYDROGEN SUPPLY SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF
- METHOD OF MOUNTING ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND PARTIALLY SHIELDED BOARD FOR MOUNTING ELECTRONIC DEVICES
The present invention relates to metal materials used in a hydrogen environment. More particularly, the invention relates to ferritic steels having excellent tensile properties and fatigue properties in a hydrogen environment, and to a method of manufacture thereof.
BACKGROUND ARTFrom a global environmental standpoint, large expectations are being placed on having hydrogen energy systems such as fuel cell vehicles and a hydrogen energy infrastructure of hydrogen stations and the like become a reality. However, metal materials exposed to hydrogen in a hydrogen atmosphere undergo declines in tensile properties and fatigue properties due to hydrogen embrittlement. In particular, given that fatigue failure is associated with 80% of failure accidents, there is a need to elucidate the mechanisms for the hydrogen-induced decline in fatigue properties and to pay very close attention to the fatigue design of hydrogen-related equipment. In light of the above, to ensure the safety and reliability of hydrogen energy systems and infrastructure, there exists a desire for high-performance metal materials which do not experience hydrogen-induced declines in tensile properties and fatigue properties.
For example, at present, only the austenitic stainless steel SUS316L and the aluminum alloy 6061-T6 have been approved for use as metal materials exposed to hydrogen in fuel cell vehicles, with 6061-T6 being used as the liner of hydrogen tank and SUS316L being used in pipes and various types of valves and springs. Titanium alloys are used in the hydrogen storage vessels disclosed in Patent Documents 1 and 2. Moreover, austenitic stainless steel is almost always assumed as the piping material to be used in the hydrogen pipelines currently being proposed.
- Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. H10-38486
- Patent Document 2: Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2007-298131
Today, the metal materials regarded as capable of withstanding use in a hydrogen environment, including the above-mentioned austenitic stainless steel, are all very expensive. Were these to be used in the construction of a hydrogen infrastructure, the costs calculated based on the amount of such materials that would be needed in piping would be extremely high. This has become an obstacle to the construction of a hydrogen infrastructure. In addition, parts used in a hydrogen environment end up being expensive, which is a major factor holding back the popularization of fuel cell vehicles and the like. By contrast, ferritic steels cost no more than one-tenth as much as austenitic steel. However, when used in a hydrogen environment, their tensile properties and fatigue properties are far inferior to those of austenitic steels, making their use under conditions of exposure to hydrogen difficult at present.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTIONThis invention was conceived in light of the above circumstances. The object of the invention is to provide ferritic steels having tensile properties and fatigue properties capable of withstanding use in a hydrogen environment, and a method of manufacturing the same.
The invention solves the above problems by the following means.
By adding one or more element selected from among vanadium (V), titanium (Ti) and niobium (Nb) so as to include, together with at least ferrite grains in the structure, a carbide or carbides of one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb, the reduction of area and fatigue crack propagation rate of ferritic steel in a hydrogen atmosphere are improved. The advantages of the invention were confirmed in cases where the ferrite grains are small grains 1 μm or less in size, in cases where the ferrite grains are coarse grains from several micrometers to 20 μm in size, and in cases where the ferrite grains are coarse grains from several micrometers to 60 μm in size.
The one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb is added in an amount which is preferably at least the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as the carbide or carbides thereof. That is, an amount sufficient to fix all the carbon in the structure as vanadium carbide, titanium carbide, niobium carbide, or two or more of these carbides. The amount C* of carbon which can be fixed as the carbides VC, TiC and NbC having stoichiometric compositions may be obtained from the following formula, wherein VC, TiC and NbC represent the amounts of the respective elements which bond with carbon.
Here, the units of C*, VC, TiC and NbC are mass %. The atomic weights of C, V, Ti and Nb were taken to be, respectively, 12.01, 50.94, 47.86 and 92.90.
In order to fix all the carbon included in the structure, the following must hold
C<C* (2)
(the units of C here are mass %).
Therefore, the amounts of addition for the respective elements are
V=VC,Ti=TiC,Nb=NbC (3).
Here, the amounts of V, Ti and Nb are in units of mass %.
In cases where vanadium has been added, a similar improvement in the reduction of area performance can be confirmed even without reaching the amount required to fix all the carbon (
The invention has the effect of improving the tensile properties and fatigue properties of ferritic steels in a hydrogen environment, and enabling them to withstand use under circumstances involving exposure to hydrogen. This makes it possible to markedly reduce the expenses required for building a hydrogen infrastructure. Moreover, the invention also makes it possible to greatly reduce production costs for parts used in a hydrogen environment, such as hydrogen tank liners, pipelines and various types of valves and springs used in fuel cell vehicles, thus making it possible to provide fuel cell vehicles at lower prices. In addition, the invention makes it possible to hold down considerably construction costs for hydrogen pipelines.
At present, SUS316L is used as the material in the pipelines through which high-pressure hydrogen gas flows at hydrogen stations for 701 Mpa. SUS316L lines manufactured in accordance with the High-Pressure Gas Safety Act have the following dimensions: in ½ inch pipe, an outside diameter of 12.7 mm and an inside diameter of 3.1 mm; in ⅜ inch pipe, an outside diameter of 10 mm and an inside diameter of 2.1 mm. In addition, hydrogen gas filling nozzles have an inside diameter of 1.6 mm. Because of such a small inside diameter, pressure loss sometimes occurs, causing the flow rate during filling to become only a fraction of the initial design value. It is possible to improve the fill rate to some degree by using SUS316, but at a very high cost. By using the ferritic steel of the invention as the pipe material, it is possible to construct a hydrogen station at a much lower cost than at present.
In recent years, SGP and STPG370 carbon steel pipes have been investigated as candidate materials for hydrogen pipelines. However, from the standpoint of properties, the toughness decreases due to the presence of pearlite in the carbon steel. Moreover, a problem with pearlite is that it becomes a hydrogen trapping site. Therefore, pearlite-free ferritic steel, owing to the improved tensile properties and fatigue properties in a hydrogen environment, is outstanding as a candidate material for hydrogen pipelines.
In the invention, it was discovered that when ferritic steel to which a trace amount of at least one element selected from among vanadium (V), titanium (Ti) and niobium (Nb) has been added is hydrogen-charged then subjected to tensile testing and fatigue testing, considerable improvements with regard to the effects of hydrogen on the tensile properties and the fatigue properties are achieved compared with conventional materials. Preferred modes for carrying out the invention are described below in detail.
1. Test MaterialsThe chemical ingredients in the test materials are shown in Tables 1 to 4. The balance in all of the materials was iron (Fe) and inadvertent impurities. Table 1 shows the chemical ingredients in the common carbon steel S45C for machine structural use which is used here for the sake of comparison.
Table 2 shows the chemical ingredients in the comparison base steel.
As shown in Table 3 (Series I) and Table 4 (Series II), the materials of the invention are ferritic steels in which the base steel is 0.05C-0.30Si-1.5Mn and to which a trace amount of at least one element selected from among V, Ti and Nb has been added. Chemical analysis of all the materials was carried out by inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy. Here, the amounts of V, Ti and Nb addition are determined based on above formulas (1) to (3). When the carbon content is 0.05 mass %, the amounts of these respective elements needed to fix the carbon are 0.212 mass % of V, 0.199 mass % of Ti, and 0.387 mass % of Nb. These values indicate the amount required to fix all the carbon when V, Ti or Nb is added alone. As shown in Table 3, the amount of V addition in V02-I is 0.2 mass %, the amount of V addition in V04-I is 0.4 mass %, the amount of Ti addition in Ti03-I is 0.3 mass %, and the amount of Nb addition in Nb05-I is 0.53 mass %. In V04-I, Ti03-I and Nb05-I, the amount of these respective elements suffices as the amount required to fix all the carbon. However, in V02-I, the amount of vanadium is lower than the amount required to fix all the carbon. As shown in Table 4, the amount of Ti addition in Ti02-II is 0.25 mass %, the amount of V addition in V02-II is 0.27 mass %, and the amount of Nb addition in Nb04-II is 0.45 mass %. In each of these materials, the amount of these elements suffices as the amount required to fix all the carbon. Thus, in the Series I materials V02-I and V04-I shown in Table 3, the V additions are respectively 0.2 mass % and 0.4 mass %; and in the Series II material V02-II shown in Table 4, the V addition is 0.27 mass %. Hence, materials were prepared which contained amounts of these elements that ranged from less than to about twice as much as the amount required to fix all the carbon; that is, an addition of 0.212 mass %, as determined based on formulas (1) to (3).
Table 5 shows the heat treatment conditions and the thermomechanical treatment conditions for the test materials. As shown in Table 5(a), S45C used in the experiments below was obtained by annealing (heated at 845° C. for 30 minutes, then allowed to cool in air), followed by quenching (so-called water quenching, which entails heating at 845° C. for 30 minutes followed by cooling in water), then tempering (heated at 550° C. for 60 minutes, then allowed to cool in air).
In addition, base material as a control and various Series I and Series II ferritic steels subjected to the thermomechanical treatment shown in Table 5(b) were also prepared. That is, treatment entailed 60 minutes of forging at 1170° C., followed in turn by cooling in air, rolling at 560° C. and a rolling reduction of 95%, and cooling in water to form a fine-grained structure. Ferritic steels subjected to this treatment are referred to herein as “fine-grained materials.” In addition to fine-grained materials, various Series I and Series II ferritic steels subjected to the thermomechanical treatment shown in Table 5(c) were prepared. This treatment entailed carrying out the thermomechanical treatment in Table 5(b) and additionally carrying out 60 minutes of annealing at 600° C. or 700° C. so as to obtain a grain size which is about the same as that in conventional materials. Ferritic steels subjected to this treatment are referred to herein as “coarse-grained materials.”
The inventors also prepared two test materials having reduced additions of V, Ti and Nb. The chemical ingredients of those test materials are shown in Table 6. In both materials, the balance was iron (Fe) and inadvertent impurities. In the material V005 shown in Table 6, 0.05 mass % of V has been added. This is substantially the amount required to fix all carbon (C). In the material V007-Nb01-Ti007, 0.07 mass % of V, 0.13 mass % of Nb and 0.07 mass % of Ti have been added. That is, V has been added in about one-third the amount required to fix all the carbon with V alone, Nb has been added in about one-third the amount required to fix all the carbon with Nb alone, and Ti has been added in about one-third the amount required to fix all the carbon with Ti alone. Collectively, these amounts of addition are approximately the same as the amount required to fix all the carbon. Fine-grained materials obtained by subjecting V005 and V007-Nb01-Ti007 to the thermomechanical treatment in Table 5(b) were prepared.
An immersion charging method was used to hydrogen charge the specimens. The hydrogen charging conditions used were in general accordance with the proposed measures being studied for standardization by the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan and the Japan Society of Spring Engineers. That is, hydrogen charging was carried out by immersion in an aqueous solution containing 20 mass % of ammonium thiocyanate. The temperature of the aqueous solution was held at 40° C., and the charging time was 48 hours.
The tensile test was carried out using an autoclave having a maximum capacity of 100 kN (Shimadzu Corporation) and based on JIS B7721. The test rate was 0.5 mm/min. The specimens were No. JIS14A bars having a diameter of 5 mm and a gauge length L of 25 mm.
4. Fatigue Test Methods 4-1. Fatigue Life TestThe fatigue life test was carried out using a hydraulic servo-type tension-compression fatigue tester (Shimadzu Corporation) having a maximum capacity of 50 kN, and under sinusoidal uniaxial loading. The stress ratio R (minimum stress/maximum stress: σmin/σmax) was −1. The test was carried out only at a cycle speed of 30 Hz on the uncharged material, and at three cycle speeds—0.2 Hz, 2 Hz and 30 Hz—on hydrogen-charged materials. However, in the case of S45C and the fine-grained comparison base steel, because the fatigue life had a strong cycle speed dependence, tests at 0.02 Hz were also carried out.
The fatigue tests carried out were primarily low life-side (high stress-side) tests in which hydrogen release from the specimen was low. The specimens used in the fatigue life tests are shown in
To further clarify the effects of hydrogen on the fatigue properties, a fatigue crack propagation test was performed on some of the materials. The fatigue crack propagation test was carried out using a hydraulic servo-type tension compression fatigue test having a maximum capacity of 10 kN, and under sinusoidal loading at a cycle speed of 30 Hz. The two methods shown in
In the ΔK reducing tests at constant Pmax, when ΔK decreases as the crack progresses, the stress ratio R gradually rises. Hence, by setting the initial test conditions to R≧0.5 and ΔK≧7 MPa·m1/2, complex crack closing behavior can be avoided until the fatigue crack threshold ΔKth is reached. In this way, the influence of hydrogen on fatigue crack propagation can be clearly understood. To clarify the cycle speed dependency, 0.2 Hz and 2 Hz tests were also carried out on Series I and Series II materials having trace element additions. In these cases, the tests were carried out near ΔK=10 MPa·m1/2 and at R=0.5 and a constant load amplitude ΔP. The crack lengths were measured at intervals of 0.2 mm or 0.1 mm using both the alternating current potential method and the compliance method (a method of measuring the crack length from the output of a strain gauge attached to the back of the specimen). A 1 mm pre-crack was introduced at R=0.1 and ΔK=15 MPa·m1/2.
The specimen had a shape commonly used in fatigue crack propagation tests. Because the Series I and Series II stock was in the form of 17 mm square bar, the plate-like bending specimens having a width of 12 mm and a plate thickness of 10 mm shown in
Following completion of the fatigue tests, samples were immediately cut from the test specimens, and the amount of absorbed hydrogen was measured with a gas chromatograph-type thermal differential analyzer (TDA). The ramp-up rate was set at 100° C./h up to an ultimate temperature of 600° C., and the cumulative amount of hydrogen released up to 500° C. was treated as the amount of absorbed hydrogen.
5. Test Results 5-1. Tensile PropertiesTable 7(a) shows the tensile test results for the S45C uncharged material, and Table 7(b) shows the tensile test results for the S45C hydrogen-charged material. Table 8(a) shows the test results for Series I (fine-grained) uncharged materials, Table 8(b) shows the test results for Series I (fine-grained) hydrogen-charged materials, and Table 8(c) shows the test results for Series I (fine-grained) hydrogen-charged materials which were 3% pre-strained. Table 9(a) shows the test results for Series II (fine-grained) uncharged materials, and Table 9(b) shows the test results for Series II (fine-grained) hydrogen-charged materials. In addition, Table 10(a) shows the test results for Series I (coarse-grained: annealed at 600° C. for 1 hour) uncharged materials, and Table 10(b) shows the test results for Series I (coarse-grained material: annealed at 600° C. for 1 hour) hydrogen-charged materials.
The amounts of hydrogen shown in these tables are the amounts of absorbed hydrogen in the specimens, as measured following tensile testing. Because the tensile test time is only about 15 minutes long, hydrogen release during the test is low. Here, in the test results shown in Table 7, even though hydrogen charging was carried out on S45C, decreases in the 0.2% offset yield strength and the tensile strength are not observed. On the other hand, decreases in the elongation and reduction of area are observed; in particular, the decrease in the reduction of area was pronounced. The reduction of area is generally used to assess the influence of hydrogen on the tensile properties. From the results in Table 7, it was possible to confirm a decrease in the reduction of area due to the influence of hydrogen in S45C having no additions of V, Nb or Ti.
In the test results shown in Tables 8 to 10, on comparing uncharged materials with hydrogen-charged materials, there were no large differences in the 0.2% offset yield strength (stress at the time of 0.2% plastic deformation) and the tensile strength in any of the specimens. This was the same as for S45C. However, a characteristic of Series I and Series II materials is that the reduction of area in hydrogen-charged materials exhibits no decrease or decreases only slightly if at all compared with that in uncharged materials. That is, by adding any one of the elements V, Nb or Ti to ferritic steel, the influence of hydrogen on the tensile properties can be decreased.
Here, on comparing two materials having 0.20 mass % additions of V, namely V02-I (fine-grained material) and V02-I (coarse-grained material), with V02-II (fine-grained material) having a 0.27 mass % addition of V and V04-I (fine-grained material) and V04-I (coarse-grained material) having 0.40 mass % additions of V, it can be confirmed that there are no clear differences in the relative reduction of area. Hence, it is not necessarily the case that all the carbon must be fixed in order to improve the reduction of area and make ferritic steel capable of withstanding use in a hydrogen atmosphere. While adding sufficient additive to fix all the carbon is of course acceptable, because V, Ti and Nb are all expensive, when taking cost into account, it is desirable to minimize the amounts in which these are used.
5-2. Fatigue PropertiesSummarizing the results in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Based on the above results, the influence of hydrogen on the fatigue crack propagation properties were carefully studied.
With regard to the Series I material V02-I (fine-grained material) shown in
Based on the experimental results in
In the case of the comparison base steel (fine-grained material) (Δ in
With regard to V005 (fine-grained material), as shown in
In the case of the fine-grained material Ti02-II with a trace amount of Ti addition, the relative fatigue life is about 1.2 at a cycle speed f=0.2 Hz, about 1.0 at f=2 Hz, and about 0.6 at f=30 Hz. In the case of the fine-grained material V02-II with a trace amount of V addition, the relative fatigue life is about 2.3 at a cycle speed f=0.2 Hz, about 1.9 at f=2 Hz, and about 0.9 at f=30 Hz. Hence, the ratio Nf/(Nf)H and the ratio (da/dN)H/(da)/(dN) shown in
With regard to the fine-grained material V005, as shown in
The invention provides ferritic steels which are capable of being used under a hydrogen atmosphere. The ferritic steels of the invention can be employed as structural materials in hydrogen energy systems such as fuel cell vehicles, and in hydrogen energy infrastructure such as hydrogen stations.
Claims
1. A hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel, comprising, with one or more element selected from among vanadium (V), titanium (Ti) and niobium (Nb) being added, a carbide or carbides of one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb in a structure composed primarily of ferrite grains, wherein
- the ferritic steel exhibits improvement in reduction of area and in a fatigue crack propagation rate in a hydrogen atmosphere.
2. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 1, wherein the structure is composed primarily of fine ferrite grains having a diameter of 1 μm or less.
3. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 1, wherein the structure is composed primarily of coarse ferrite grains having a diameter of from several micrometers to 20 μm.
4. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 1, wherein the structure is composed primarily of coarse ferrite grains having a diameter of from several micrometers to 60μ.
5. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb has been added in at least the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as the carbide or carbides.
6. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of any one of claims 1 to 4, comprising carbides of all the elements V, Ti and Nb, wherein
- the V, Ti and Nb have been added in a collective amount which is substantially the same as the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as the carbides.
7. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb has been added in an amount which is less than, but at least one-fourth of, the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as the carbide or carbides.
8. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein, of the V, Ti and Nb, the only element that has been used as an additive is V, and the V has been added in an amount which is less than the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as a carbide of V.
9. The hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein, of the V, Ti and Nb, the only element that has been used as an additives is V, and the V has been added in an amount which is less than, but at least one-fourth of, the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as a carbide of V.
10. A method of manufacturing a hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel, the method comprising a step of adding one or more element selected from among vanadium (V), titanium (Ti) and niobium (Nb) so as to include a carbide or carbides of one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb in a structure composed primarily of ferrite grains, and thereby improving the reduction of area and fatigue crack propagation rate of ferritic steel in a hydrogen environment.
11. The method of manufacturing a hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 10, wherein the one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb is added in at least the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as the carbide or carbides.
12. The method of manufacturing a hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 10, wherein the ferritic steel includes carbides of all the elements V, Ti and Nb, and V, Ti and Nb are added in a collective amount which is substantially the same as the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as the carbides.
13. The method of manufacturing a hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 10, wherein the one or more element selected from among V, Ti and Nb is added in an amount which is less than, but at least one-fourth of, the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as the carbide or carbides.
14. The method of manufacturing a hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 10, wherein, of the V, Ti and Nb, the only element to be added is V, said V being added in an amount which is less than the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as a carbide of V.
15. The method of manufacturing a hydrogen fatigue-resistant ferritic steel of claim 10, wherein, of the V, Ti and Nb, the only element to be added is V, said V being added in an amount which is less than, but at least one-fourth of, the amount required to fix all carbon (C) in the structure as a carbide of V.
Type: Application
Filed: Jan 29, 2010
Publication Date: Dec 15, 2011
Applicant: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (Tokyo)
Inventors: Saburo Matsuoka (Fukuoka), Masao Hayakawa (Ibaraki), Etsuo Takeuchi (Ibaraki), Nobuo Nagashima (Ibaraki)
Application Number: 13/203,102
International Classification: C22C 38/04 (20060101); C22C 38/14 (20060101); C22C 38/12 (20060101); C22C 38/02 (20060101); C22C 38/06 (20060101);