SOLE FOR A SHOE, IN PARTICULAR FOR A RUNNING SHOE
A shoe sole (7) consisting of a midsole (1) and an outsole (3) consisting of discrete outsole elements. The midsole (1) has on the side facing the outsole a multiple of flex grooves (27, 29, 34, 51, 53, 55, 57, 63) crossing each other and creating pads (26, 28, 30, 33, 35, 50, 52, 54, 56) in the midsole. A curved forefoot flex groove (63) emanates from the medial side (21) of the arch (48) and essentially follows a path over one or more of the cuneiform bones (72, 73, 74) and continues between the third (83) and fourth (82) metatarsal phalanges, over the third (77) proximal phalange and continues between the first (85) and second (84) metatarsal phalanges in a direction towards the heel. Both the outsole elements and the pads are arranged to follow an essentially spiral curve (64) around the curved forefoot flex groove. The sole reduces the risk of injury during running, and gives the foot increased compensation possibilities for correcting imbalances especially after heel strike.
Latest ECCO SKO A/S Patents:
The invention concerns a sole for a shoe, in particular for a running shoe. One type of running shoes of the state of the art has in common the concept of protection of the foot. More precisely, the shoe is considered a sheltering instrument for the foot. This protection concept has lead to relatively heavy running shoes, which often have a sole or insole with a high degree of cushioning in order to mitigate the force reactions stemming from the heel strike and acting on the ankle joint and the leg. Another type of running shoes are ultra lightweight shoes which often are below 300 grams. This type is minimalist having thin soles and thin uppers. When designing shoes, the shoe industry has for a long period had the natural moving foot as the ideal state of motion, e.g. barefoot running on grass, where the foot unconstrained by a shoe is allowed to perform its natural motion. However, once the shoe is on the foot, natural motion of the foot is impeded. As an example, the angle of the metatarsal phalangeal joint is reduced considerably when wearing shoes. The metatarsal joint angle is the angle between the ground and the metatarsal phalanges. If measured at the instant just before pushing off from the ground, this angle is in barefoot running close to 60 degrees and in so called technical or athletic running, where running shoes are used, reduced to only 35 degrees. Impediment of the natural motion of the foot means among other things that the muscles of the leg and foot which are active during barefoot running are also constrained. These muscles are not allowed to act with their full strength, and thus the shoe, if wrongly designed, will limit the ability of the runner to move efficiently. His performance is lowered as compared to barefoot running. Some of the key muscles during walking and running are musculus flexor hallucis longus and musculus extensor hallucis longus. The importance of these strong muscles when considering barefoot running in relation to running with shoes has already been acknowledged in U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,973, which is incorporated herein by reference. More specifically U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,973 describes a midsole for a running shoe which sole has a multiple of flex joints or grooves in longitudinal and transversal direction. A number of discrete outsole elements are connected to the midsole. This structure allows the toes of the foot to act independently and to increase the stability of the shoe. In particular, the flex joints have created an isolated sole area for the hallux, hereby allowing flexor hallucis and extensor hallucis longus to play a greater role during running. U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,973 describes the relatively thick midsole of current running shoes as a reason for instability leading to risk of injuries. In order to reduce this risk, U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,973 provides as already described a solution with flex joint grooves in the sole and particularly along the hallux between the first and second toe. This prior art solution is an improvement over earlier prior art, in that injuries from running can be lowered. However, the solution in U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,973 is essentially directed towards a running shoe for sprinters who are during a sprint mostly running on the forefoot. Marathon runners, on the other hand run slower and use a greater area of the foot.
WO99/05928 describes a skateboard shoe which has a midsole which on the side facing the outsole comprises a multiple of flex grooves crossing each other and creates pads in the midsole. The midsole further has a curved channel which emanates from the medial side of the arch and essentially follows a path over one or more of the cuneiform bones of the foot of a wearer, and continues between the third and fourth metatarsal phalanges up to approximately the toe end. Although this shoe is not directed towards running, the design of the forefoot in the midsole has flexing characteristics, which could be of advantage to runners. Modifications are needed, though, because the concrete design of the outsole adds weight and constrains some of the flexibility achieved with the midsole.
In the light of the foregoing, the present invention sets out to solve the problem of how to reduce further the risk of injury during running.
This is achieved with a sole according to claim 1.
The invention takes its offset in the basic assumption that natural running is the ideal situation, and that a sole should be designed in a way that brings running as close to the ideal situation as possible. Instead of extensive cushioning in running shoes, or extreme reduction of the weight, a concept of supporting the foot in its natural motion during running has been developed.
Thus, the inventive sole is characterized in that the outsole consists of discrete outsole elements, and that the pads in the midsole as well as the discrete outsole elements are arranged to follow an essentially spiral curve around a curved forefoot flex groove. This curved flex groove enables the sole to bend in the longitudinal direction along a bending line between the first three metatarsal phalanges on the one hand, and the lateral two metatarsal phalanges on the other hand. The importance of this line of flexibility and the existence of this “2-3 split” has in the eyes of the applicant not been correctly addressed in modern sole design, particularly in soles for running shoes. Recognizing this bending line in the sole design by allowing the sole to be bent along this axis enables the supinating and pronating muscles of the leg to compensate faster after heel strike in the situation where the foot either pronates or supinates. The optimum flexibility has been achieved by letting each discrete outsole element correspond to an isolated pad of the midsole. This enables the midsole pads to act more independently from each other during running dynamics. Thus, in the case of a too large pronation, i.e. the case where the arch of the foot is moved to the medial side, the supinating muscle flexor hallucis longus will counteract the pronation by a supinating reaction on the medial side of the foot. This supinating counteraction is made in order to get the ankle into neutral position where no supination or pronation exists. Counteraction will be faster with a sole having the inventive curved flex groove and independent midsole pads and discrete outsole elements, because muscle flexor hallucis does not have to “lift” the whole sole in order to counteract, but only a part of it, namely the part on the medial side of the curved flex groove, i.e. the part which comprises the first, second and third metatarsal phalanges. As the inventive sole gives the foot increased compensation possibilities for correcting imbalances especially after heel strike it contributes to a faster equalization of the ankle position also in the cases of large pronation or supination and the risk of damage to the ankle in these situations is reduced. In the end, the risk of running injuries is reduced.
In order to support the concept of getting close to natural running, extensive data had to be collected and turned into practical measures. The last used for the inventive sole is a so called anatomical last which means that is has a higher degree of similarity to the foot compared to a normal foot shaped last. In other words, the anatomical last is in shape very close to the human foot. The high degree of similarity has been achieved by measuring 2200 feet. By examination of the many data from the feet we have created so to speak “an average human foot” and put this shape into the last. During manufacturing of the shoe, the sole material, which is injected, will follow the shape of the anatomical last and hereby take the shape of the average human foot. The foot sole will rest comfortably on the manufactured sole, because the sole is a mirror of the foot sole.
In a preferred embodiment, the curved forefoot flex groove is continued from the start of the proximal metatarsal phalanges over the third proximal phalanges, crossing the second and continued in a direction between the first and second metatarsal phalanges in a direction towards the heel. This measure further increases the longitudinal flexibility of the sole.
A transversal flex groove is made in the midsole from the medial side towards the lateral side in the region where the metatarsal phalanges meet the proximal phalanges. This flex groove is essentially a straight groove, is crossing the curved forefoot flex groove, and adds flexibility in the transversal plane of the sole. This groove is preferably made wider than other flex grooves in the midsole because it exerts influence on the metatarsal phalangeal joint angle.
A further flex groove follows the joints between the proximal phalanges and the medial phalanges.
The curved forefoot flex groove emanates from the medial side of the arch, and has a straight portion which runs parallel to a reinforcement bar made in the midsole. The reinforcement bar adds strength to the midsole, and is connected to a midsole pad in the medial heel area, which pad when equipped with a discrete outsole element is flush with the ground. This design counteracts over-pronation.
Preferably, the heel portion of the midsole also has a curved flex groove emanating from the medial side and stretching to the lateral side. This flex groove is deeper and wider than the transverse flex grooves in the forefoot, and has the function of decoupling the heel of the sole from the forefoot sole in order to allow “horizontal flex”, i.e. in order to allow horizontal movement of the heel portion especially during heel strike. This functionality can be compared to the human fat padding in the heel area; it also allows a small horizontal movement back and forth. In copying this feature from nature, a shoe with the inventive sole allows a runner to get closer to natural running.
Preferably, a second curved heel flex groove is made in the heel. This flex groove delimits the flat, horizontal portion of a heel pad from a tapered heel pad, and enables the tapered heel pad independent movement.
The curved forefoot flex groove and the curved heel flex groove are preferably devoid of any outsole material in order to allow as unconstrained movement of the foot as possible.
The subclaims specify further advantageous designs of the sole.
The invention is now described in detail by way of the drawings in which
Midsole 1 is in the preferred embodiment made of light polyurethane (PU) material, also called PU light. This material is a known special variant of PU which has a low density (0.35 g/cm3), i.e. is a lightweight material. A further characteristic is a good return of energy absorbed from the runner, which characteristic is of importance for long distance running. Shore A hardness is between 38 and 40. Alternatively, also ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) can be used as midsole because it has a lower specific gravity than PU light resulting in a lighter sole. However, EVA tends to quick ageing under frequent force influence from the foot. This ageing is seen as wrinkles in the material. It is not form stable, and after a while it is compressed and does not return to its original shape.
Midsole 1 is in this preferred embodiment covered with the second intermediate layer 2 which has the same profile as the midsole.
The third layer 3 is the outsole, which consists of a number of discrete outsole elements (e.g. reference numbers 120-123 in
Manufacturing of the sole 7 consisting of the sole parts 1, 2 and 3. is made in the following way. In a first step, the TPU intermediate layer 2 and the outsole elements 3 are produced in a separate manufacturing process to become an integrated entity. In a second step, the midsole 1 is connected to the integrated entity consisting of layer 2 and outsole 3. Step one and step two will now be described.
In step one, the TPU intermediate layer 2 and the discrete outsole elements 3 are manufactured to become an integrated entity. First the discrete outsole elements are manufactured in a rubber vulcanisation process. Then the outsole elements are placed in a mould, where TPU is inserted above the elements. The mould is closed, and under application of heat and pressure the TPU is shaped into the desired shape. After a curing time, the integrated entity of outsole elements and TPU intermediate layer is finished. Although the TPU layer is manufactured in a casting process, alternative manufacturing processes are available for producing the second layer 2. Thus, the TPU can be injection moulded in a known manner, or the TPU can be a foil-like raw material like a sheet placed above the outsole elements 3 before joining these elements and the TPU using heat and pressure.
Bonding between the TPU intermediate layer 2 and the outsole elements 3 are made with glue which is activated by the heat during moulding the TPU onto the outsole elements. A simple adhesion without glue between TPU and rubber during the moulding process proved not durable. Before adding glue between TPU intermediate layer 2 and outsole elements 3, the rubber surface of the outsole elements 3 must be halogenated in a process which removes fat from the rubber and thus enhances the adhesion.
In step two of the manufacturing of sole 7, the midsole 1 is unified with the integrated entity consisting of layer 2 and outsole elements 3 from step one, as well as with a shoe upper. More specifically, the TPU intermediate layer 2 with the outsole elements 3 is placed in an injection mould together with the shoe upper, after which PU is injected into the mould and bonds to the shoe upper and the integrated entity consisting of layer 2 and outsole elements 3. The PU thus bonds to the side of the TPU intermediate layer 2 which is closest to the human foot. After this second step, sole elements 1, 2 and 3 have become integrated into one entity. Preferably, shank 4 is only partly embedded in PU during the injection process.
The TPU intermediate layer 2 has a double function in that it lowers the breakability of the midsole and reduces the cycle time on the PU injection machinery. This will be detailed in the following.
In principle, the TPU intermediate layer can be omitted, and the isolated outsole elements placed directly in the mould by the human operator before PU injection. This would however cost processing time on the PU injection machine, because placement of the many discrete outsole elements takes time. Instead, by manufacturing the TPU intermediate layer 2 and outsole elements 3 in a separate process as described above, the PU injection machine is free to manufacture midsoles most of the time. Machine waiting time is reduced. However, the use of the TPU intermediate layer has a further advantage, namely reducing a tendency of the PU light midsole to break. If the discrete outsole elements 3 are placed directly against the PU light midsole without any intermediate layer 2, the midsole tends to break in durability tests due to the higher number of flex grooves. Such breakage will allow water to enter the shoe during wear. The reason is that when injecting PU into the mould during manufacturing, air bubbles tend to occur in the midsole. The bubbles occur because the PU is not able to press out air around sharp edges in the channels of the mould. This is probably due to the low specific gravity of the PU. The result is that air bubbles are contained in the midsole, thus making the sole liable to penetration of water when the midsole breaks or experiences cracks. TPU has a larger specific gravity, and does not cause problems with trapped air bubbles during manufacture. In other words, the midsole 1 is not liable to water penetration caused by air bubbles and breakage due to protection by the intermediate layer 2, which contributes to keeping the interior of the shoe dry.
As material for midsole 1 PU has been chosen over TPU. In principle, the whole midsole could be made of TPU, but PU light has a lower specific gravity thus lowering the weight of the shoe. Further, PU has good shock absorbing characteristic which is important especially for running shoes.
Between the midsole 1 and an insole (not shown on the figures) is the shank 4 (
Preferably, the shank 4 is placed on top of the midsole. Alternatively it could have been placed between the midsole 1 and the intermediate layer 2, but this placement would lead to friction problems between the human heel and the heel of the midsole. During running, the midsole would compress and decompress in the heel area, each compression allowing the human heel a movement downwards, and each decompression allowing the human heel to move upwards. Repeated movements downwards and upwards against the heel creates friction and discomfort for the runner. Instead, by placing the shank on top of the midsole, friction is lowered because the shank as an early stiffening layer reduces the length of downwards and upwards movements.
In one embodiment, the shank is integrated in the strobel sole, which is a flexible sole connected and typically sewn to the upper (not shown in the figures). The strobel sole is often a textile. The integration of the shank into the strobel sole gives a harder sole because the strobel sole contributes to the hardness. This embodiment has the advantage of an easier manufacturing, because the shank is sewn into the strobel sole and does not have to be placed in the mould before PU injection as described above. In the preferred embodiment however, the shank is glued to the strobel sole, which together with the upper is mounted on the last. The last is placed in the mould which is closed, after which PU is injected into the mould.
The shank 4 has an offset heel area 25 as shown in
In order to lower the hardness in the heel area even further, a comfort element 9 (
Referring to
The shank 4 is in both embodiments (i.e. cavity fully or partly filled with PU) fully or partly embedded in the PU midsole. In the forefoot and in the arch area, the shank is placed close to the strobel sole, either with or without PU in between strobel sole and shank. In the offset heel area the shank is placed close to the outsole.
Thus, by offsetting the longitudinally extending shank in the heel area of the sole, a cavity in the heel zone is created. This offset heel area has a platform on which the PU from the midsole is embedded during the injection process. The PU enters the cavity through a hole made in the platform, or, more precisely, through an opening made in the offset heel area of the shank. The heel area is offset towards the outsole to a second horizontal plane different from a first horizontal plane of the arch area of the shank. Our tests have shown, that this design gives a better running experience because the heel area of the sole has become softer.
A special insole has been provided. The insole consists of two layers. The upper layer is a polyester material, which is lightweight, and breathable. The bottom layer is made in two versions. For class A runners the bottom layer consists of EVA, which advantageously has a low weight, and for class B runners the bottom layer is made of PU foam. This is a more expensive solution, but gives a better insole. The bottom layer has through-going holes for breathing. In the heel portion of the insole an area with shock absorbing material is placed, and in the forefoot area of the insole an energy return material is placed which during push off releases most of the energy received during heel strike and full foot contact. Instead of placing the shock absorbing material in the insole it can also be embedded during the injection process in the heel of the midsole 1.
The inventive midsole 1 is shown in
The curved flex groove is substantially wider than the other flex grooves. In one embodiment it is six millimetres wide, the flex groove 34 three millimetres and the flex groove 31 four millimetres. As a rule, the curved flex groove is between 1.5 and 3 times wider than the other flex grooves. The width of the curved flex groove can be varied, but it has preferably a width corresponding to 1-2 times the distance between the third and fourth metatarsal phalanges. However, the distance may not be too wide because this would cause too much flexibility. Further, the flex groove has essentially a constant width along its curve in the forefoot.
The curved flex groove 63 intersects the transverse flex grooves 29, 31 and 34. The curved flex groove thus runs in longitudinal direction from the medial side of the arch to an apex point 59 in the metatarsal zone of the foot. From this apex point the groove continues in the opposite direction along path 60 and crossing flex grooves 57 and 55. It ends approximately under the ball of the big toe in flex groove 61. The curvature of the groove in essence gives the sequence of midsole pads a spiral shaped character: Thus, starting in an origo point O in pad 62, a curve 64 can be drawn which describes a somewhat compressed or eccentric spiral graph. When mounted later in the manufacturing process, the discrete outsole elements 3 will describe the same curve.
The function of the curved flex groove 63 is to enable natural running by giving the midsole a bending line in longitudinal direction between the third and the fourth metatarsal phalanges and hereby giving the characteristic “2-3 split” of the rays of the foot attention. This will be detailed in the following.
The outline of the curved flex groove 63 is shown with the line 90 in
Turning back to
On heel strike, the midsole and outsole is designed to allow so called horizontal flexing. This is achieved with the curved heel flex groove 45 of
In
Comparative tests between the inventive running shoe and a state of the art running shoe have been made. 12 male test persons were using the inventive shoes and the state of the art shoes. Using a goniometer placed on the heel of the persons, foot switches for detecting ground contact and an accelerometer mounted on the tibia muscle, different parameters as angles, velocities and accelerations have been measured. Table 1 shows the comparative test results.
The rear foot angle at touchdown was a bit larger than in the state of the art shoe. Thus the heel as a mean value was turned 3.4° to the lateral side measured in relation to the ideal zero degree situation. The maximal eversion angle on the other hand was found to be 10.2° as compared to 10.1° of the state of the art shoe. The maximal eversion angle is the angle measured when the heel of the foot turns to the medial side. Of particular interest are the velocity dynamics during touchdown, where the maximal rear foot angle velocity is 390°/s (degrees per second) as compared to 480°/s on the state of the art shoe and the mean rear foot angle velocity 200°/s as compared to 290°/s. In the eyes of the applicant this is a significant difference, because the lower mean and maximum velocity results in a more stable shoe. This means that from the instant the heel hits the ground until eversion is finished, the inventive shoe is significantly slower and thus more stable. The result is a reduced risk of injuries in the ankle. The low mean rear foot angle velocity is partly due to the fact that the shoe has a low heel which advantageously brings the foot very close to the ground.
Improvements can be reached by further continuing the curved flex groove. Turning back to
In more detail,
The discrete outsole element 125 has sharp edges in an angle of about 90 degrees. When walking on an icy surface, the sharp edges penetrate the ice which creates a better grip. The total length of the sharp edges amounts to the sum of the circumference of the discrete outsole elements. The longer, the better grip one gets. However, with the invention, the grip has been even further improved. Without being bound by the following theory, it is believed that the flexible discrete outsole elements allow the foot to react in a natural way in the case of an icy surface. If you slip on one part of the foot base, the human brain will via a muscle action instruct another part of the same foot base to instantly and automatically compensate and try to get a grip on the ground. Conventional outsoles prevent this compensation because the compensational muscle reaction is constrained by the normal sole. A discrete outsole as in the invention, however, having flexible outsole islands, allows the discrete action of one or more of the 32 muscles in the foot. The improved gripping characteristic of the inventive sole was confirmed in laboratory tests in comparison with state of the art running shoes. Slip resistance showed to be improved both in relation to a wet surface and in relation to an icy surface. An improvement in slip resistance of the embodiment of
On the lateral side of the midsole 135, a measure is taken to compensate for the proximal head of the fifth metatarsal phalanges which causes a protrusion or a local extremity of the foot, also known as tuberositas ossis, see reference number 86 in
Preferably, the support structures 158 and 157 are inclined inwardly to follow the shape of the foot. As the support structures are an integrated part of the midsole and thus made of polyurethane in the preferred embodiment, the support structures have the same material characteristics as PU and are thus able to keep the inclination during use and to exert a pressure against the upper 166 and the arch. The lateral and medial support structures are bonded to the upper in a polyurethane injection process.
Toe end 36 (
The described embodiments can be combined in different ways.
Claims
1-14. (canceled)
15. Sole for a shoe, in particular a running shoe, where the sole comprises an outsole and a midsole, which midsole on the side facing the outsole comprises a multiple of flex grooves crossing each other and creating pads in the midsole, and where a curved forefoot flex groove is made in the midsole, said curved forefoot flex groove emanating from the medial side of the arch and essentially following a path over one or more of the cuneiform bones and continues between the third and fourth metatarsal phalanges characterized in that the outsole (3) comprises discrete outsole elements, and that the pads (26, 28, 30, 33, 35, 50, 52, 54, 56, 62) in the midsole (1) and the discrete outsole elements (106, 108, 111, 114) are arranged to follow an essentially spiral curve (64) around said curved forefoot flex groove (63).
16. Sole according to claim 15, wherein said curved flex groove (63) is continued from the start of the proximal phalanges over the third (77) proximal phalange and continuing between the first (85) and second (84) metatarsal phalanges in a direction towards the heel.
17. Sole according to claim 15, wherein the forefoot (23) of the midsole in a transverse direction from the medial side towards the lateral side comprises at least a first additional flex groove (31) following a path along the joints between the metatarsal phalanges (81-85) and the proximal phalanges (75-79) and crossing the curved forefoot flex groove (63).
18. Sole according to claim 17, wherein the forefoot of the midsole comprises a second additional flex groove (29, 57) which follows a path along the joints (95) between the proximal phalanges (75-79) and the medial phalanges (88).
19. Sole according to claim 16, wherein the curved forefoot flex groove has a straight portion in the arch area (48) and runs parallel to a straight reinforcement bar (47) in the midsole.
20. Sole according to claim 16, wherein the heel portion of the midsole (1) has a curved heel flex groove (45) emanating from the medial side of the heel and stretching to the lateral side.
21. Sole according to claim 20, wherein a second curved heel flex groove (42) delimits a tapered midsole pad (40, 43, 44) from a not tapered pad (38).
22. Sole according to claim 15, wherein the curved forefoot flex groove is not covered by any discrete outsole elements (3, 106, 108, 111).
23. Sole according to claim 20, wherein the curved heel flex groove is not covered by any discrete elements.
24. Sole according to claim 15, wherein the curved forefoot flex groove is between 1.5 and 3 times wider than the additional flex grooves (27, 29, 31, 34, 36).
25. Sole according to claim 20, wherein the curved heel flex groove is between 1.5 and 3 times wider than the additional flex grooves.
26. Sole according to claim 20, wherein the curved heel flex groove (45) has a depth of more than 50% of the thickness of the heel.
27. Sole according to claim 15, wherein a shank (4) is placed in or on the midsole (1), which shank has two fingers (15, 16) extending in longitudinal direction and supporting the first, fourth and fifth metatarsal phalanges.
28. Sole according to claim 15, wherein an intermediate layer (2) of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is placed between the outsole (3) and the midsole (1), that the intermediate layer is between 0.5 and 2 millimetres thick, preferably 1 millimetre, and that it follows the shape of the flex grooves (45, 55, 63) and pads (38, 50, 62) of said midsole.
29. Sole according to claim 15, wherein the pads (50, 52, 54) of the midsole have a larger surface area than the discrete outsole elements (121, 122, 123).
30. Sole according to claim 15, wherein the curved forefoot flex groove (63) has a width essentially corresponding to between one or two times the distance between the third and the fourth metatarsal phalanges.
Type: Application
Filed: Feb 20, 2009
Publication Date: Feb 9, 2012
Applicant: ECCO SKO A/S (Bredebro)
Inventor: Ejnar Truelsen (Tonder)
Application Number: 12/863,725
International Classification: A43B 13/12 (20060101);