Rapid Deployment, Self-Inflating, Interlocking, Modular Flood-Water Barrier Wall System
The water barrier is comprised of a number of interconnected modules, that contain expansive material (such as polymer powder). Each module has inlets that allow rising water to enter the interior volume of the module so that it inflates from a flattened configuration to a four sided shape. The shape is wedge shaped and the modules are alternated so that the narrow end of the module is toward the rising water on one module and the wide end is next to the rising water on the adjacent module, so that pressure from the rising water is transferred to adjacent modules from module to module and ultimately to an anchoring system.
Latest Patents:
The present application is related to and claims the priority benefit of co-pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/442,774, entitled Rapid Deployment, Self-Inflating, Interlocking, Modular Flood-Water Barrier Wall System, filed Dec. 14, 2010 by the present inventors.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThe loss and devastation caused by the incursion of unwanted or unexpected flood water into areas not designed or built to survive such flooding is well known and documented.
Often in the spring, as the winter's snow and ice accumulation melts (frequently exacerbated by seasonal rains), vast areas including farms, towns and cities, are literally inundated, often to the point the only the roofs of dwelling are visible above the flood waters.
The frequency and severity of flooding is dependant on many factors including weather patterns and cycles, proximity to rivers and streams, adequacy of flood mitigation infrastructure, land use and elevation, and sometimes the availability of people and machines to intervene and construct temporary dikes and barriers, especially in low-lying, flood prone areas.
Flooding and the devastation caused each year by rising waters costs society billions of dollars, loss of life and of irreplaceable personal property. Flooding and the resulting damage and loss is not limited to third-world countries or economically depressed areas. They can happen almost anytime and anywhere.
Occasionally the waters appear suddenly as with a flash flood, dam or levee breach, etc. but normally flooding is predictable and provides some time for evacuation or preparation.
Often, thousands of people will turn out to serve as volunteers to fill and place sandbags in hopes of keeping unwanted water out of a downtown, a school, hospital or other critical infrastructure such as telephone switch facilities or power distribution sub-stations. Unfortunately, many of those volunteers later report and/or file injury claims against the city of municipality for back, hand and shoulder injuries.
To properly construct a sandbag wall five feet in height, the US Army Corp of Engineers recommends using 9,000 filled sandbags for each 100 feet of length. The same 9,000 bags require 100 cubic yards of sand which translates to 180 tons of sand! The logistics of getting 180 tons of sand to, or near, the site where the dike is a major impediment to the timely installation of the dike. Even the largest dump trucks can only carry 18 tons of sand so therefore over 10 large sand and gravel delivery trucks would be required for 100 feet of protection.
Compounding the logistics can be challenges like wet, soft ground and the inability to get the loose sand delivered close enough to the bag filling areas. In such instances, multiple front-end loaders with drivers are then required to move the sand from the dump site to the bag filling site and then the filled bags have to make their way to the site of the actual dike or wall construction.
On average, the cost to fill and place a traditional sandbag will run between $0.60 (bag and sand only, using all volunteer labor) to $2.00+ per bag when filled and delivered by a commercial provider using its own labor and machines.
As a result, a five foot high, 100 foot long ‘wall’ of sandbags can cost the town, city or private property owner up to $18,000. One thousand linear feet could easily cost over $150,000. Yet, there are several tens of thousands of miles of existing earthen levees alone and tens of thousands more miles of rivers, streams, lake fronts and ocean shoreline that can require immediate, temporary and/or permanent barriers to mitigate flooding and subsequent property damage.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe current invention provides a highly cost effective, quickly deployed, interlocking, self-inflating and self-adjusting height, flood water barrier system that will result in the substantial savings in the cost of installation and in the protection of lives, and property. The modules low initial weight (approximately 35 lbs in a typical configuration) is one of the features that makes the rapid deployment possible.
Depending upon the length and height of the desired barrier wall, it is composed of the required number of Bags which are hereafter referred to as Inflation Modules positioned to form a vertical wall or barrier facing the approaching flood waters. The system can be deployed in a fraction of the time needed to build a traditional sand bag wall, and is especially valuable at sites not easily accessible by heavy trucks and machinery or at locations where there are insufficient labor resources (paid or volunteer).
The system completely eliminates the need to purchase and haul huge quantities of sand. When the flood threat is over the barrier is easily dismantled, removed, stored and capable of re-use.
The system uses a unique, self-inflating wedge shaped main Inflation Module which, when combined with a flexible matrix of linear elements such as cables, rope or webbing, it provides exceptional blocking or barrier strength but with maximum flexibility vis-a-vis height that can be selected, thickness of the barrier, and the application to various construction surfaces. The preferred wedge shape is trapezoidal.
The present invention is a modular Flood Barrier Wall or dike system composed of a single (or multiple) row(s) of one or multiple levels in height of large, self-inflating, wedge shaped, woven or non-woven material preferably fabric creating an enclosed volume. The Inflation Modules have up to 60 or more cubic feet of volume in each such Module all of which partially or wholly use the floodwater itself to hydrate expansive materials which preferably are comprised of dry cellulose and/or powered cross linked acrylamide or acrylate cross-linked polymers capable of absorbing up to 500 or more times its own weight in water (salt or fresh) contained inside the Module to then inflate, expand and completely fill the interior cavity of the above described trapezoidal Inflation Module.
The self-inflating feature of the flood barrier system allows the entire structure to be extremely light weight before hydration and can be deployed quickly with minimal labor and without the aid of heavy machines. For example, prior to hydration (from any source including the flood-waters themselves), a 50-60 cubic foot Inflation Module with a cellulose/polymer blend typically weighs less than 35 lbs. Following complete hydration of the super absorbent cellulose and cross-linked polymers, the same Module weighs approximately 3,000 lbs.
While a traditional 5′ high sandbag wall or dike would require a continuous base width of at least 10′ (front to back), the current invention typically requires a base (or bottom) footprint of less than 5′.
The height of the Modular Barrier Wall invention described in this Application is variable based on several factors. The first is determined by the height of the fully hydrated and inflated Module itself. Inflation Modules can be produced in multiple heights (typically 36″ and 60″) and stackable so the content volumes and weights of the final configuration will vary accordingly.
As an example, stacking 36″ high Modules on top of 60″ high Modules (aligning the seams in the lower or first row of Modules with the center line of the bags comprising the second or next row for added strength and leak resistance, a wall of approximately 96″ or 8 feet in height can be built.
Whereas sandbag walls or dikes are built in a pyramid shape (side view), the barrier wall system described herein is not. The front-to-back (‘z’ axis) represents the thickness of the barrier wall and will typically be the same at the base or bottom as it is at the top of the same Module. This results from the extra stability obtained through the use of the wedge shaped module.
The resistive or ‘blocking’ strength or ability of the barrier wall described herein to hold back ‘x’ inches or feet of encroaching flood water is a function of the combination of one or more of the following unique features:
The geometric strength of the module is enhanced by a rigid endoskeleton which include the rigid corner baffle system, and an optional x-brace to maintain the integrity of the trapezoidal shape.
The hydrated weight and mass of each Module itself (typically 3,000 pounds or more and 50-60 cubic feet of semi-solid expansive materials such as hydrated polymers completely filling and pushing out against the outer fabric skin of the Module.
The connectivity of one Module to the other is via a high tensile strength linear element. The linear element preferably may be vinyl coated steel cable, rope or woven webbing (the rope and webbing can made from natural or man-made fibers such as polypropylene). These linear elements of which there are typically two per row (or wall) of Modules, run through attachment structures, preferably strap loops secured to each Inflation Module The first linear element runs parallel to the ground with one along the top ‘back’ edge (the one furthest away from the approaching flood waters) and the second along the bottom back edge of the barrier wall structure. The linear elements are either pre-threaded or field threaded through strap loops sewn or otherwise attached to the outside fabric or skin of the Inflation Modules. A single pair of these parallel connecting linear elements can be used to connect up to twelve (12) Inflation Modules (the group of Modules so connected are also referred to herein as a string) together (totaling, for example, thirty linear feet). The ends of both linear elements may then be secured to one or more ground anchors which may be steel, of appropriate strength driven approximately 24″-36″ into the ground 4-6 feet past the first and last Module connected into that particular string of Modules. The stakes preferably are driven at angles leaning away from the direction of the linear elements and at an angle ranging from 10° to 90° off the ‘X’ axis or front of the barrier wall preferably leaning in the direction of the approaching water. The linear elements serve, in part, to hold the modules in side by side abutting relationship.
The entire barrier wall itself may advantageously be placed in a shallow (approximately 6″ to 8″) deep, by up to approximately 60″ wide trench. The trench is cut, scrapped or dug in earth such as by a small tractor or a front-end loader. In an ideal implementation, and subject to time and availability of materials, the above described trench would receive 1″ of sand in the bottom from one side to the other and for the entire length of the trench. If sand is not available, various thick, non-woven geo-textiles or erosion mats can be placed in the trench. Whatever material is used, it will serve to help create a water seal between the bottom of the Inflation Module and the bottom of the trough on which the Modules rest. This seal inhibits the flow of water under the Inflation Module and avoids the accompanying erosion. In applications where the barrier wall will be built on concrete or asphalt levee, a courser, thicker and a higher friction matting or pad is used under the Modules. The rear portion of the barrier wall will typically be placed along the rear wall or lip of the shallow trench so that the Modules are held in position by the back edge of the recessed trench for added stability of the barrier wall.
In some applications it may be necessary or prudent to place an additional row or partial row of Inflation Modules behind the main barrier wall staggered so that the center of the wide end of the trapezoid overlaps the joints created between three of the Modules on the front row of the barrier wall.
When the flood waters reach the Inflation Modules, each Module hydrates and its expansive materials fill the interior space of the Module, the Module itself will fill and ‘plump up’ and its sides will bow outwardly. Therefore two adjacent Modules will bow against each other and eliminate any space between them that existed prior to the hydration process. This action will close the space between the Modules and restrict water seepage. To further enhance and assure the sealing of the space between Modules, there may be attached to the exterior side walls and across the bottom of each Inflation Module and running the full height of each Module two, parallel 3-6″ wide strips of thick natural or man-made fabric (including foam rubber) seals or alternatively pliable rubber rib seals, also running the full height of each Module (beginning at the bottom-most edge or corner of the Module and running straight up to the top edge or corner of the Module. These horizontal and vertical and bottom ‘seals’ will be positioned so that when two Modules are placed side by side, the vertical seals are either side by side or, alternatively butting up against one another if a thicker seal is required.
Referring now to the drawings there is illustrated in
Typically a single string of Modules arranged side by side, and placed alternating front-back and back front for a virtually unlimited total length. Additional Modules may be placed on top of the bottom string to increase the height of the wall. Additional individual Modules may also be placed at random or fixed intervals along the rear of the main barrier wall to provide additional weight and mass to the main wall in cases where the flood waters are either rising very fast or are expected to exert additional forces against the wall from currents or large objects that may be carried along with the flood waters and could impact and weaken the main wall.
Referring to
Referring to
The external portion 101A of the inlet port penetrates the outer skin or fabric of the Inflation Module.
A groove 101B is provided in the inlet port 101A on the interior side of the inlet port. The groove provides a recess 101B for the rubber or elastic band 101C. The one-way valve 101D is held in place by the rubber of elastic band 101C which seats in the grove 101B so that the one-way valve 101D will not slip off.
The rubber or elastic band 101C in its original circumference, is approximately 20% smaller than the port 101A's circumference that it the band 101C will encircle. The size difference assures it will fit tightly around the port.
The wind-sock shaped rubber or fabric one-way valve 101D is attached around the inlet port system, inside the Inflation Module 100. The circumference of the sock at the large end is slightly more than the circumference of the inlet port itself to allow the sock to be slipped on easily but relatively snuggly and then secured by the elastic band 101C. Both ends of the sock are open with the non-connected (dangling) end typically somewhat smaller than the connected end. When the Inflation Module is dry and un-hydrated, the sock hangs vertically. When water in entering through the inlet pipe or port from outside the Module, the pressure and volume of that water causes the sock to move to the horizontal allowing the inflowing water to enter freely. When the interior of the Inflation Module fills with expansive material, that material pushes against the sock causing it to bend in one direction or another, thus shutting off (blocking) either the entrance of additional water into the Module, or the exit or seepage of hydrated expansive material back out through the inlet ports.
Referring to
Referring to
Ground stake 103A secures the cable or rope and provides additional resistance against the rising flood waters pressing against the barrier wall. Such ground stakes will typically be made of steel, iron or wood and driven a minimum of 30″ into the ground at a slight angle away from the Barrier Wall and toward the approaching water. An auger-style stake may also be used to secure the cable or rope.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring again to
Referring to
The interior facing surface 107A may, as illustrated, have large holes or ports for improving structural rigidity and/or allowing the passage of hydrated cellulose into the space created by the triangular baffle.
Referring to
The frame 108C snaps into receptacles (not shown) and holds the filter/fabric tightly in place across the inlet ports.
108D depicts the interior portion of the inlet port or pipe through which water may enter the Module
108E depicts the male and female snap mechanism that allows the frame to attach to the back plate 108A.
Claims
1. A water barrier system comprising:
- A plurality of modules arranged in at least one string of multiple modules,
- said modules formed of sheet material forming an enclosed volume,
- expansive material contained in the modules that expands when wet, to form a three dimensional shape of substantial height and strength,
- at least one water ingress opening in each module to admit rising water and cause the module to incrementally increase in height as the expansive material hydrates to form a structure with at least three sides and a top and bottom, and
- an anchoring system which transfers the stress tending to force the module away from the rising water, to anchors on opposite ends of each string of modules.
2. The water barrier system of claim 1, wherein,
- The modules have at least four sides with one end being wider than the other,
- The modules being arranged with the wider and narrower ends alternating along the string of modules.
3. The water barrier system of claim 1, wherein,
- said modules are wedge shaped in horizontal cross section with one end being substantially larger than the opposite end.
4. The water barrier of claim 3, wherein,
- said modules are trapezoidal in shape.
5. The water barrier of claim 1 wherein:
- The walls said module is comprised of woven fabric material.
6. The water barrier of claim 1, wherein,
- said module is comprised of sheet plastic material.
7. The water barrier of claim 1, wherein,
- the water egress opening incorporates a one-way valve.
8. The water barrier of claim 1, wherein,
- said one-way valve prevents the outflow of water or of solidified expansive material.
9. The water barrier of claim 1, wherein,
- said expansive material comprises cellulose.
10. The water barrier of claim 9, wherein,
- said expansive material comprises a cross-linked polymer powder.
11. The water barrier of claim 10, wherein,
- said cross-linked polymer comprises an acrylamide.
12. The water barrier of claim 10 wherein,
- said cross linked polymer comprises an acrylate.
13. The water barrier of claim 1, wherein,
- the enclosed volume of the Inflation Module is 50 cubic feet or more.
14. The water barrier of claim 1 wherein,
- said linear element comprises plastic coated steel cable.
15. The water barrier of claim 1 wherein,
- said linear element comprises rope.
16. The water barrier of claim 1 wherein,
- said linear element comprises web strapping.
17. The water barrier of claim 1, wherein,
- webbing material is attached to the exterior of said module and at least partial surrounds the horizontal aspect of said module when it is inflated by the hydration of the expansive material.
18. The water barrier of claim 1, wherein,
- there are a plurality of vertically stacked egress openings to allow the egress of flood waters to higher and higher levels as the expansive material expands.
19. A water barrier system comprising:
- A plurality of modules arranged in at least one string of multiple modules,
- said modules formed of sheet material and forming an enclosed volume,
- expansive material contained in the modules that expands when wet, to form a three dimensional shape of substantial height and strength,
- at least one water ingress opening in each module to admit rising water and cause the module to incrementally increase in height as the expansive material hydrates to form a structure with at least three sides and a top and bottom, and
- an anchoring system incorporating ground penetrating shafts on opposite ends of a string of modules to which linear elements are attached to transfer the stress tending to force the modules away from the rising water, to anchors on opposite ends of each string of modules.
20. The water barrier of claim 19, wherein,
- said linear elements that are secured to each of said modules in a string of modules.
21. The water barrier system of claim 20 wherein
- said modules have attached strapping with openings through which said linear elements are passed.
22. The water barrier of claim 21, wherein,
- said openings are formed by webbing loops attached to said modules.
23. A water barrier system comprising:
- a plurality of modules arranged in at least one string of multiple modules,
- said modules formed of sheet material and forming an enclosed volume,
- expansive material contained in the modules that expands when wet, to form a three dimensional shape of substantial height and strength,
- said modules being connected together by at least on high strength linear element holding said modules in a side by side abutting relationship.
24. A water barrier system according to claim 23, wherein:
- Said modules having at least on vertically oriented seal attached to the sides abutting adjacent modules.
Type: Application
Filed: Dec 14, 2011
Publication Date: Aug 16, 2012
Applicant: (Escondido, CA)
Inventors: Paul J. Bouchard (Little Rock, AR), Robert S. Bouchard (Little Rock, AR), Clarence A. Cassidy (Escondido, CA)
Application Number: 13/325,979
International Classification: E02B 7/02 (20060101); E02B 7/08 (20060101);