RAPID TAX COLLECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD
Preferred examples of a system and method for rapid collection and distribution of taxes are disclosed. The disclosed embodiments of the present invention provide a system and a method for point-of-sale collection and distribution of sales taxes on a frequent, regular basis, such as daily or weekly or other periodic time intervals, that can be used for face-to-face, e-commerce, telephone or other transactions. The disclosed embodiments provide a system and a method for transferring funds from numerous merchants to numerous taxing authorities in an efficient manner, with each merchant seeking to transfer funds to perhaps several taxing authorities and each taxing authority seeking to receive funds from many merchants. According to other examples of the invention, a centralized distribution feature allows the merchants and the taxing authorities to each communicate with a single entity or other in transferring the funds. Therefore, efficient tax collection and distribution may be achieved without overburdening either individual merchants or individual taxing authorities
Latest Fairshare, LLC Patents:
This application is related to, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 19(e) of U.S. provisional applications Ser. No. 60/297,194, titled “TAX COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM”, filed Jun. 7, 2001, and No. 60/306,029, titled “TAX COLLECTION SYSTEM”, filed Jul. 16, 2001, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Additionally, the following related U.S. Patent Applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety:
1. U.S. patent application Ser. No., Attorney Docket No. 044848-2004, titled “SYSTEM FOR AND METHOD OF RAPID COLLECTION OF INCOME TAXES,” filed concurrently herewith.
2. U.S. patent application Ser. No., Attorney Docket No. 044848-2005, titled “RAPID TAX COLLECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CASH AND CASH-SUBSTITUTE TRANSACTIONS,” filed concurrently herewith.
3. U.S. patent application Ser. No., Attorney Docket No. 044848-2006, titled “RAPID TAX COLLECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEBIT-TYPE TRANSACTIONS,” filed concurrently herewith.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to data processing systems and the methods of their use. In particular, the invention relates to a system and method for rapid collection and distribution of taxes from transactions.
2. Related Art
The information contained in this section relates to the background of the art of the present invention without any admission as to whether or not it legally constitutes prior art.
Various systems and methods have been employed for the payment and reporting of taxes to governmental agencies. For example, reference may be made to U.S. Statutory Invention Registration H1,830 and the following U.S. Pat. No. 5,335,169 to Chong; U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,405 to Chasek; U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,283 to Francisco et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,875,433 to Francisco et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,078,898 to Davis et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,078,899 to Francisco et al.
In particular, the '283 patent, the '433 patent and the '899 patent are directed to systems for automatically collecting and reporting taxes. The systems disclosed in these patents create reports on sales tax and provide means of reporting the tax to the state and federal government. These systems do not, however, address the distribution of taxes.
In addition to the payment and reporting of taxes, the collection of sales and use taxes is an important business requirement of retailers and merchants throughout the United States. In this regard, taxing authorities at the local, state and federal levels require both large and small businesses to collect a sales tax for each taxable item of goods they sell in the course of commerce.
To meet taxing authority requirements, currently a typical merchant and/or other entity must calculate the sales tax for each customer transaction, add the calculated sum to the invoice or bill subtotal presented to the customer for the goods sold, collect the sales tax from the customer with the purchase sum, deposit for safe keeping the collected taxes and finally remit and account for the collected taxes to the appropriate taxing authorities on a periodic basis, which is typically on a quarterly basis, and/or other.
To compensate the merchant or retailer for the burden of acting as the agent for the taxing authority, the merchant is allowed to keep the periodic interest accrued on the collected tax dollars during each collection period.
While the above described method of collecting and remitting sales and use taxes has been effectively employed for many years, such a method is not cost effective and cumulatively costs the taxing authorities millions of dollars. In this regard, the taxing authority not only loses the accrued periodic interest known as “the float,” but the authority also loses the use of the collected money until it is remitted by the merchants for the collection period. Moreover, since the taxing authority does not have the use of the collected money until it is remitted, the money is not available for use to pay the monetary obligations of the taxing authority. Thus, the taxing authority may be compelled to borrow money to meet its financial obligations. Furthermore, such a system places a heavy burden on merchants and taxing authorities alike since it requires manual implementation.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,644,724, issued Jul. 1, 1997, there is disclosed a point-of-sale tax collection system and method of using same. The abstract of the '724 patent states that a “new and improved tax collection system and method collects and remits taxes in real time at point-of-sale locations. The system includes a group of point-of-sale terminals at merchant point-of-sale facilities that receive and store tax collection information under merchant control. A bank computer at a merchant bank accesses the stored tax collection information and wire transfers the collected sums periodically to at least one computer at a taxing authority such as a tax authority bank or other financial organization. For credit or debit transactions, a service computer receives the tax collection information daily or at other periods of time from certain ones of the point-of-sale terminals, and wire transfers the credited or debited taxes to the tax authority bank computer.”
Such a patented system is highly desirable, effective and efficient for tax collection and distribution. It would be desirable to extend such a system to, for example, a nationwide or, perhaps, a worldwide network of merchants. However, due to the fact there are numerous taxing authorities, such as federal, state and local governments, and/or other entities in the United States and internationally, each merchant would be required to communicate with the numerous taxing authorities each day or other regular period of time. This complexity can be disruptive and unwanted for some situations such as for small businesses.
Additionally, each taxing authority would be required to communicate with thousands of merchants across the nation on a regular basis in order to receive the tax revenues. Each taxing authority would be required to invest in sufficient resources in order to handle the demand of the collection system. This demand may be too burdensome for many taxing authorities.
Additional problems related to the collection of sales tax on a large-scale basis are created with the explosion of e-commerce transactions. One problem created by e-commerce is related to the determination of the proper taxing authority. For example, transactions to the Internet may involve a consumer in one state, a merchant's place of business in another state, warehousing in a third state, billing or processing in a fourth state, and a fulfillment center in a fifth state. Each of the five states involved may have different taxing rules. For example, a state may require tax on a transaction if the consumer is in that state, or the state may require tax if the merchant is in that state. Thus, a merchant may be required to distribute taxes to a large number of taxing authorities.
With the emergence of the Internet and the explosion in e-commerce transactions, the taxing authorities are bound to experience a sharp increase in the number of transactions-in such a system. Such an increase would require each taxing authority to expand its ability to handle all of the anticipated transfers.
The present invention provides a system and a method for the effective collection and distribution of sales taxes from credit-card and/or other transaction types without imposing an undue burden upon individual merchants or individual taxing authorities.
In the following, the invention will be explained in further detail with reference to the drawings, in which:
The disclosed embodiments of the present invention provide a system and a method for point-of-sale collection and distribution of sales taxes on a frequent, regular basis, such as daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, or other. The disclosed embodiments provide a system and a method for transferring funds from numerous merchant banks, financial accounts or other, to numerous taxing authorities banks, financial accounts or other, in an efficient manner, with each merchant seeking to transfer funds to perhaps several taxing authorities and each taxing authority seeking to receive funds from many merchants. An automated and centralized distribution feature utilizing available transactional infrastructure would allow the merchants banks, financial accounts or other, and the taxing authorities banks, financial accounts or other, to each communicate with a single or relatively few entities in transferring the funds. Therefore, efficient tax collection and distribution may be achieved without overburdening either individual merchants or individual taxing authorities.
As an example of an embodiment of the invention,
Referring first to
As illustrated in
In another embodiment, illustrated in
For a conventional brick-and-mortar merchant location, the merchant 14 may have a computer with a magnetic strip reader for swiping a physical credit card, a point-of-sale electronic payment device or a conventional cash register and/or other payment device. For e-commerce or telephone transactions, the merchant 14 may have a host such as a server connected to a web link, a virtual terminal and/or other payment device.
Referring now to
Such distribution rules may also be used to provide the additional advantage of preventing or remedying fraud. For example, distribution rules implemented on a merchant's computer may be used to collect back taxes owed by the merchant to one or more taxing entities.
Referring now to
Similarly, in the embodiment illustrated in
Referring again to
In the embodiment illustrated in
Similarly, in the embodiment illustrated in
Referring again to
For the embodiment illustrated in
In many instances, the total sales amount may be different from the amount approved in the first phase. For example, in the case of restaurants and/or other establishments where a gratuity would be used (e.g., taxi, hair salon, delivery, bar, or other), the approved amount may include the sale amount plus an allowance for a gratuity. Once the consumer adds the tip to the sale amount, the total sales amount is transmitted to the acquirer bank 21 (
Referring again to
In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring again to
Referring now to
The acquirer bank's computer 21A then forwards a debit request, such as a settlement request or other, to the computer 25A at the appropriate credit-card association 25 and/or other COs (line U in
The association's computer 25A may then forward the debit request to the issuer bank's computer 18A (line W in
It is understood that the computer 27A at the central financial entity 27, as well as the various other illustrated computers, may be a group of computers disposed in different locations. They may, of course, include various different servers in a networked system such as an Internet-based system.
Alternatively, the information from the merchants' computer 14A may only include raw data relating to the transactions, including the monetary amount of transactions involving each taxing entity 29. In this instance, the central financial entity's computer 27A, for example, may determine the required distributions to the various taxing entities 29 based on the provided information, knowledge of the tax laws of the various taxing entities 29 and/or predetermined distribution rules, such as those discussed in paragraph 41. In a further embodiment, an external service entity (not shown) may perform the determination of the distributions and may pass that information to the computer 27A at the central financial entity 27.
The central financial entity's computer 27A may then distribute the tax amounts to the various taxing entities banks 29, financial account entity or other according to the information provided by a third party service computer, or the merchant's computer 14A (lines Y in
The credit-card association's computer 25A may subtract a fee for its services from the credit file. The charge may be a percentage of the funds processed by the association 25 and/or other card organization, or a transaction fee or other. In this regard, the present invention may offer the additional advantage of lowering the cost to the merchant 14 of conducting credit card transactions. Since the tax portion of the fund transfer may be removed prior to receipt of the funds by the association 25 and/or other card organization, the merchant 14 may not be required to pay a fee for processing of that tax portion of the transaction. However, the funds may include tax amount as done today, thereby providing additional percentage fees to the associations and other card organizations.
The credit card association's computer 25A and/or other card organizations then forwards the balance of the funds to the acquiring bank's computer 21A (line Z2 in
In other embodiments of the invention, other entities may be used as a distribution point for the taxing entities 29. For example, the computers 25A at various credit associations, third party service providers and/or other CO 25 may serve as the distributing entities. Alternatively, each acquirer bank 21 or issuer bank 18 may perform this function. (Not shown in
In yet another embodiment, as illustrated in
For the embodiment illustrated in
For sake of simplicity,
Similarly, the embodiment illustrated in
It is understood that the functions performed by any entity illustrated in the figures may be divided among two or more entities. Similarly, functions performed by two or more illustrated entities may be performed by a single entity.
Thus, in a system according to an embodiment of the invention, the tax proceeds are distributed to the taxing entities' banks 29 or financial account entities in a centralized manner from numerous merchants and including a plurality of acquirer banks, issuer banks and merchant's banks. Accordingly, the taxing entities banks 29 or financial account entities each receive their funds from either a single source or relatively few sources, rather than the thousands of merchants throughout their jurisdiction. Further, the tax funds may not be transmitted to each individual merchant bank or financial account entity 14; rather, they may be directed to the taxing entity banks 29 or financial account entities prior to the transmittal of funds to the merchant bank or financial account entity 14. However, it will become apparent to those skilled in the art that the merchant may receive the tax funds prior to their transmission to the taxing authority. Accordingly, there is little or no opportunity for a merchant to withhold some of the funds for himself. Additionally, the taxing entities are provided with the funds quicker without reliance on fast action by the merchants.
In another embodiment, the merchant's computer 34A may forward the information directly to the central financial entity's computer 47A.
In other embodiments, as illustrated in
Referring again to
The distribution function performed by the central financial entity 47 in the above example may alternatively be performed by another entity. It is understood that the central financial entity 47 may be any institution or entity qualified and capable of serving as a conduit for the transfer of funds to the various taxing entities 49 bank or financial account entity.
For sake of simplicity,
Similarly, the embodiment illustrated in
It is understood that the communications between the various computers may be via secure networks.
In other embodiments, as illustrated in
Referring again to
In the embodiment illustrated in
In other embodiments, the debit clearinghouse computer 161A may forward the entire fund transfer to the central financial entity computer 167A for distribution to the merchant's bank's computer 163A and the various taxing entity banks or financial account entities. In a still further embodiment, the functions of the debit clearinghouse 161 and the central financial entity 167 may be performed by a single entity.
Referring again to
In one embodiment, the functions of the clearinghouse 61 and the central financial entity 67 may be performed by a single entity. For example, the clearinghouse 61 may distribute funds to the taxing entities 69 or other bank or financial authority directly.
In another embodiment, the total amount of the transaction, including the tax portion, may be transferred at line AR to the merchant's bank's computer 63A. The merchant's bank's computer 63A may then transfer the tax portion, along with the distribution information, to the computer 67A at the central financial entity 67, with remainder of the funds being directed to a bank or financial account belonging to the merchant 54. In this regard, the merchant's bank's computer 63A may accumulate the tax funds from several transactions prior to submitting the information and the funds to the central financial entity's computer 67A. Thus, rather than a data and fund transfer for each transaction, the merchant's bank's computer may perform such a transfer periodically, such as on a daily weekly and/or other basis.
In still further embodiments, the computer 58A at the consumer's bank may only transfer the amount of the transaction less the tax portion to the computer 61A at the debit clearinghouse 61 at line AN. The consumer's bank's computer 58A may transfer the tax portion with distribution information to the computer 67A at the central financial entity 67.
For the sake of simplicity,
Similarly, the embodiment illustrated in
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed, it is to be understood that various different modifications and combinations are possible and are contemplated within the true spirit and scope of the appended claims. There is no intention, therefore, of limitations to the exact abstract and disclosure herein presented.
Claims
1.-87. (canceled)
88. A method for a point-of-sale collection and distribution of sales taxes, the method comprising the steps of:
- a) a consumer obtaining a credit card and a credit line from an issuer;
- b) a merchant interacting with the issuer through a payment gateway having a gateway computer;
- c) the issuer and an acquirer interacting through credit card associations;
- d) distributing funds through one or more than one qualified central financial entity using one or more than one computer;
- e) receiving the distributed funds a plurality of taxing entities using one or more than one computer; and
- f) receiving fund transfers by the plurality of taxing entities on behalf of the taxing entities.
89. The method of claim 88, where the issuer is a bank, a service provider or both a bank and a service provider.
90. The method of claim 88, where the merchant can interact with the acquirer, the service provider or both the acquirer and the service provider using a payment gateway having a gateway computer.
91. The method of claim 88, where the merchant can also have an account at a merchant's bank for holding and transferring funds to the plurality of taxing entities.
92. The method of claim 88, where the issuer and the acquirer are the same.
93. The method of claim 88, where the central financial entity consists of the group selected from a Federal Reserve Bank, a state bank, a private entity and a government entity.
94. The method of claim 88, where the plurality of taxing entities is selected from an individual states, a local municipality and a federal government.
95. The method of claim 88, where the taxing entities have various taxing rates, various distribution rules or both various taxing rates and various distribution rules.
96. The method of claim 88, where the issuer can be selected from the group consisting of a bank, a travel company, an entertainment company and a petroleum company.
97. The method of claim 88 further comprising the step of the merchant acquiring credit-transaction capabilities through an acquirer bank, a service provider or both an acquirer bank and a service provider.
98. The method of claim 88 further comprising the steps of:
- a) presenting a credit card from the issuer by a consumer to the merchant to make a transaction;
- b) forwarding information regarding the transaction to the computer at the acquirer;
- c) determining an amount of tax to be collected from the consumer;
- d) transmitting the information regarding the transaction and the amount of tax to be collected to the issuer;
- e) receiving authorization from the issuer for the transaction amount and the amount of tax to be collected;
- f) transferring from the merchant computer to the acquirer, credit-card and transaction information;
- g) calculating tax owed to the plurality of taxing entities; and
- h) distributing the tax to the plurality of taxing entities.
99. The method of claim 98 further comprising the step of obtaining approval for the credit card transaction from the issuer by the merchant using a device prior to completing the transaction.
100. The method of claim 99, where the device is selected from the group consisting of a computer, a payment terminal and a payment device.
101. The method of claim 98, where the merchant can transmit information regarding the transaction directly to the acquirer through a gateway computer at a gateway.
102. The method of claim 98, where the merchant can forward the information regarding the transaction to a computer at a third party service provider.
103. The method of claim 98, where the transaction information can comprise a transaction amount and a portion for taxes.
104. The method of claim 98, where the determination of the tax to be collected can be performed by the merchant computer, the third-party service provider computer or both the merchant computer and the third-party service provider computer using a location of the consumer, a location of the merchant, tax laws of the taxing entities and predetermined distribution rules.
105. The method of claim 98, where the step of transferring from the merchant computer to the acquirer is performed through the gateway computer.
106. The method of claim 98, where the credit-card and transaction information comprises a total sales amount.
107. The method of claim 98, where the credit-card and transaction information comprises raw data relating to the transaction, including a monetary amount of the transaction involving each taxing entity.
108. The method of claim 98, where the credit-card and transaction information comprises merchant tax reporting information.
109. A method for a point-of-sale collection and distribution of sales taxes by a third party service provider, the method comprising the steps of:
- a) a consumer obtaining a credit card and a credit line from an issuer;
- b) a merchant interacting with a third party service provider;
- c) the third party service provider and an acquirer interacting through credit card associations;
- d) distributing funds through one or more than one qualified central financial entity using one or more than one computer;
- e) receiving the distributed funds a plurality of taxing entities using one or more than one computer; and
- f) receiving fund transfers by the plurality of taxing entities on behalf of the taxing entities.
110. The method of claim 109 further comprising the steps of:
- a) presenting a credit card from the issuer by a consumer to the merchant to make a transaction;
- b) forwarding information regarding the transaction to the computer at the third party service provider;
- c) determining an amount of tax to be collected from the consumer;
- d) transmitting the information regarding the transaction and the amount of tax to be collected to the issuer;
- e) receiving authorization from the issuer for the transaction amount and the amount of tax to be collected;
- f) transferring from the third party service provider to the acquirer, credit-card and transaction information;
- g) calculating tax owed to the plurality of taxing entities; and
- h) distributing the tax to the plurality of taxing entities.
111. The method of claim 109, where the merchant's computer can transmit the required information through a payment gateway having a gateway computer to the third-party service provider computer.
112. The method of claim 109 further comprising the steps of:
- a) Transmitting the information from the third-party service provider computer to a computer at a tax service provider;
- b) determining the allocation of the tax funds to the appropriate taxing entities;
- c) receiving from the tax service provider computer the information including tax distribution information by the third-party service provider; and
- d) transmitting a debit request from the third-party service provider to one or more credit-card associations.
113. The method of claim 109, where the third-party service provider and the tax service provider are the same.
114. A method for a point-of-sale collection and distribution of sales taxes, the method comprising the steps of:
- a) distributing tax proceeds to taxing entities' banks in a centralized manner from one or more merchants;
- b) distributing tax proceeds to financial account entities in a centralized manner from one or more merchants;
- c) receiving tax proceed funds from one or more than one source; and
- d) transmitting the tax funds directly to a taxing entity bank, a financial account entity bank or both a taxing entity bank and a financial account entity bank prior to transmitting funds to a merchant bank, a financial account entity or both a merchant bank and a financial account entity.
115. The method of claim 114, where the merchant can use a merchant computer to transmit the transaction information to a third-party service provider computer.
116. The method of claim 115, where the third-party service provider computer can transmit the information to a computer at a tax service provider for determination of tax allocation.
117. The method of claim 116, where the third party service provider and the tax service provider are the same.
118. The method of claim 116, where the tax service provider computer can transmit information, including the tax allocation information, to the third-party service provider computer for transmission to a computer at a central financial entity.
119. The method of claim 115, where the merchant's computer may transmit the information to the third-party service provider through a gateway computer.
120. The method of claim 115, the merchant can use a merchant computer to transmit the transaction information to a tax service provider computer.
121. The method of claim 114, where a single central financial entity can distribute tax funds from a plurality of merchants, a plurality of taxing entity banks and a plurality of financial account entities.
122. A system for a point-of-sale collection and distribution of sales taxes:
- a) a credit card and a credit line issued to a consumer by an issuer;
- b) a merchant computer operable with the credit card for processing a transaction between the merchant and the consumer;
- c) a payment gateway electronically connected to the merchant computer; and
- d) instructions executable on the merchant computer, the payment gateway or both the merchant computer and the payment gateway for calculating and transferring funds a plurality of taxing authorities.
123. The system of claim 122, where the payment gateway is an automated and centralized distribution center communicatively connected to available transactional infrastructure comprising instructions executable on a computer for calculating and distributing tax funds to the plurality of taxing authorities.
Type: Application
Filed: Mar 22, 2013
Publication Date: Sep 12, 2013
Applicant: Fairshare, LLC (San Diego, CA)
Inventors: Richard Agee (Temecula, CA), Carolyn M. Ponder (Antioch, IL), Arthur D. Starbuck (Murrieta, CA), Clark L. Ballantyne (San Diego, CA)
Application Number: 13/849,369