POSITION ESTIMATION ASSISTANCE INFORMATION FOR MOBILE STATION
The subject matter disclosed herein relates to providing assistance information to a mobile station for performing position estimation operations.
Latest QUALCOMM Incorporated Patents:
- Cellular vehicle-to-everything design principles
- Techniques for listen before talking (LBT) access mechanisms for radar systems
- Frame based equipment (FBE) structure for new radio-unlicensed (NR-U)
- Channel occupancy time (COT) sharing under heterogeneous bandwidth conditions
- Listen-before-talk failure reporting for sidelink channels
This application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of and priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/555,735 filed Sep. 8, 2009, entitled “Position Estimation Assistance Information for Mobile Station,” which is assigned to the assignee hereof and expressly incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
BACKGROUND1. Field
The subject matter disclosed herein relates to providing a mobile station with assistance information related to estimating a position for the mobile station.
2. Information
The position of a mobile station, such as a cellular telephone, may be estimated based on information gathered from various systems. One such system may comprise a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), which is one example of a satellite positioning system (SPS). SPS systems such as GNSS may comprise a number of space vehicles (SV) orbiting the earth. Another example of a system that may provide a basis for estimating the position of a mobile station is a cellular communication system comprising a number of terrestrial base stations to support communications for a number of mobile stations. A further example of a system that may provide a basis for estimating the position of a mobile station is a wireless network compatible with the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11 wireless local access network (WLAN) standard, which may also be referred to as a Wi-Fi network. Such a network may include access points and sensors, for example.
A position estimate, which may also be referred to as a position “fix”, for a mobile station may be obtained based at least in part on distances or ranges measured from the mobile station to one or more transmitters, and also based at least in part on knowledge of the locations of the one or more transmitters. Such transmitters may comprise SVs in the case of an SPS and/or terrestrial base stations in the case of a cellular communications system and/or Wi-Fi/802.11x transmitters or similar beacon transmitters, for example.
An almanac may be maintained for systems used for position estimation. The almanac may contain various types of information, including, for example, information that may be used in position estimation operations. Such information may include the identities and locations of the various transmitters of the system, for example.
SUMMARYIn an aspect, a mobile station may determine additional fix information associated with an estimation of a position of the mobile station, and the additional fix information may include one or more measurements obtained from processing the one or more received wireless signals. Signals representative of at least a subset of the additional fix information may be transmitted into a network. Further, one or more signals representative of updated almanac information may be received from the network. The updated almanac information may be based, at least in part, on the subset of additional fix information.
Non-limiting and non-exhaustive examples will be described with reference to the following figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various figures.
As discussed above, information organized in an almanac may be used in performing position estimation operations for a mobile station. A position estimate for a mobile station may be obtained at least in part from distances or ranges from the mobile station to one or more transmitters such as space vehicles (SV) and/or terrestrial base stations at known locations. As mentioned previously, an almanac may contain various types of information, including, for example, identities and locations of the various transmitters.
In another aspect, a mobile station may be provided with information related to one or more SVs that may enhance a time to first fix (TTFF) for the mobile station. For example, a mobile station may be provided with predicted orbital information for a number of SVs. In one particular implementation, such information may help the mobile station to narrow search windows for acquiring signals from one or more of the SVs, allowing quicker acquisition of such signals, for example. Additionally, a mobile station may be provided with timing information from an SPS to further enhance position estimation performance.
In one aspect, a mobile station may receive orbital and timing information from a network entity such as an assistance server. A number of mobile stations may provide information related to acquired signals from a variety of SVs and/or other beacon transmitters identified with unique identifiers or other characteristics to the assistance server, and the assistance server or some other network entity may utilize the gathered information to predict orbital patterns. These predictions may be broadcast to one or more mobile stations for the mobile stations to use in performing position estimation operations, often referred to as position fixes. As used herein, the terms “position estimation operation” and “position fix” are synonymous, and are used interchangeably.
In another aspect, a plurality of mobile stations may gather information related to wireless transmitters, which may be referred to herein as “base stations”, as the mobile stations perform position fixes. Such information may be referred to as “fix information” and may comprise measurement information related to one or more signals received from one or more base stations and/or utilized in obtaining a position fix. Fix information may also comprise transmitter location information that may be broadcasted by at least some base stations. Fix information may further comprise information generated by one or more sensors of a mobile station. A mobile station may store information related to a number of position fixes, and such information may enhance the performance of future position fix operations for that particular mobile station. In an aspect, information gathered in the course of a position fix may be referred to a position fix information, or more simply as “fix information”. Such fix information may be stored in a memory of a mobile station in what may be referred to as a “fix database” in which the fix information is organized and/or indexed according to particular instances of position fixes. Fix information may also be stored in a “cell database” in which fix information may be organized and/or indexed according to particular base stations observed and/or identified during position fix operations. In one example implementation, a mobile station may comprise one of a cell database and a fix database. In another example implementation, a mobile station may comprise both a cell database and a fix database. However, the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular count or type of databases capable of storing position fix information. Similarly, the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular organization and/or indexing of fix information.
In the course of operation of a mobile station, the mobile station may interact with a number of cells, whether the cells are actual serving cells or are non-serving cells. Signals received from such serving and non-serving cells may be used, in some cases, to perform position estimation operations, and measurement information gleaned from these operations may be stored in a fix database and/or a cell database for future reference in order to enhance the performance of future position fixes. In another aspect, some transmitters may broadcast their location, perhaps as part of a beacon signal in some cases. Information related to the positions of such transmitters may also be stored in fix databases and/or cell databases in the same manner as information gleaned from position estimation operations, even if the broadcasted transmitter location information is not used as part of position estimation operations. Also, as discussed previously, information from fix and/or cell databases may, in another aspect, be shared with other mobile stations so that such other mobile stations may take advantage of the obtained information.
In another aspect, a user of a mobile station may elect to allow the mobile station to transmit position fix information and/or broadcasted transmitter location information from a cell database and/or from a fix database to a central resource such as an assistance server in order to share the position fix information with other mobile stations. In return, in another aspect, the mobile station may receive position fix information gathered by other mobile stations. In an additional aspect, at least a portion of the gathered position fix information may be delivered to the mobile station in the format of a base station almanac, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. In gathering position fix information, a number of mobile stations may provide information related to signals acquired from a variety of SVs and/or other stationary and mobile terrestrial beacon transmitters that may be identified via unique identifiers and/or characteristics. Further, as will be discussed below, fix information from transmitters located within buildings may be gathered by a number of mobile stations equipped with one or more sensors in order to update and/or maintain a transmitter information database such as a base station almanac, for example.
As previously mentioned, information related to various land-based transmitters of a wireless communication system may be stored in what may be referred to as a base station almanac (BSA). The term “base station almanac” as used herein is meant to include any organized set of information related to a plurality of transmitters of a wireless communication network. A base station almanac may be stored in a memory of a computing platform, such as an assistance server, for example, or in a memory of mobile station, for another example. In another aspect, base station almanac may be transmitted from an assistance server to one or more mobile stations. In a further aspect, a subset of a BSA stored at an assistance server may be transmitted to one or more mobile stations, and may further be referred to as base station almanac information. Such base station almanac information may comprise a “sparse” base station almanac in one aspect, or may comprise a regional base station almanac in another aspect. Of course, these are merely examples of base station almanac information that may be delivered from an assistance server to a mobile station, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. Further, the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited to base stations. Rather, example implementations may include any transmitter of beacon signals that may be identified via unique identifiers or other characteristics. In another aspect, a base station almanac may be formed by gathering transmitter location information that may be broadcasted by individual base stations. Such an almanac may be updated as additional transmitter location information is received at one or more mobile stations and the mobile stations transmit such information to an assistance server maintaining the BSA, in an example implementation. The assistance server may aggregate transmitter location information received from the various mobile stations, and may transmit an updated BSA to one or more mobile stations, in an aspect.
In one aspect, a mobile station may use the received BSA information to perform position estimation operations, for example by trilateration using information and measurements from a number of transmitters. The mobile station may also use the received BSA information, in another aspect, to narrow a code phase search window for acquiring signals transmitted by an SPS in order to perform position estimation operations using, at least in part, measurements from signals received from one or more space vehicles (SV). For example, to narrow a search window, a mobile station may use base station almanac information to associate an identification of a sector currently serving the mobile station with a base station almanac entry. The entry may provide a location of the transmitter for the serving sector, from which an approximate location (within a couple of kilometers, for example) of the mobile station may be obtained.
Also, as previously mentioned, base station almanac information may further include fix information gathered by a number of mobile stations in performing position fix operations. An assistance server, a data manager, or other network entity may receive the position fix information gathered by the mobile stations and may determine which of the fix information to include in the base station almanac information to be delivered to a mobile station.
As used herein, the term “base station” is meant to include any wireless communication station and/or device installed at a fixed terrestrial location and/or movable and used to facilitate communication in a wireless communications system, such as, for example, a cellular network, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. In another aspect, base stations may be included in any of a range of electronic device types. In an aspect, a base station may comprise a wireless local area network (WLAN) access point, for example. Such a WLAN may comprise an IEEE 802.11x network in an aspect, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. WLAN access points may be relatively small in size, and may be easily moved by a user configuring a network. This is merely one example of a base station that may change position from time to time, or that may be mobile. It should be noted that the scope of claimed subject matter is further not limited to stationary base stations, but rather the scope of claimed subject matter may include any type of wireless signal transmitter, whether stationary or mobile. Further, in another aspect, position fix information may be determined from any type of beacon signal, including signals from visual technologies including cameras, information from sensors, and Bluetooth wireless signals, to name but a few examples.
As used herein, the term “mobile station” (MS) refers to a device that may from time to time have a position location that changes. The changes in position location may comprise changes to direction, distance, orientation, etc., as a few examples. In particular examples, a mobile station may comprise a cellular telephone, wireless communication device, user equipment, laptop computer, other personal communication system (PCS) device, personal digital assistant (PDA), personal audio device (PAD), portable navigational device, and/or other portable communication devices. A mobile station may also comprise a processor and/or computing platform adapted to perform functions controlled by machine-readable instructions.
In an aspect, SPS 110 may comprise a number of SVs, for example SVs 112, 114, and 116. For an example, SPS 110 may comprise one or more satellite positioning systems, such as GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, or any other present or future GNSS, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. In one or more aspects, mobile station 200 may receive signals from SVs 112, 114, and 116, and may communicate with one or more of base stations 132, 134, and 136. For example, mobile station 200 may obtain one or more measurements from one or more signals received from one or more of the SVs and/or base stations. However, in some circumstances timing signals from an SPS may not be available. In such a circumstance, mobile station 200 may gather propagation delay information through communication with one or more of base stations 132, 134, and/or 136. Mobile station 200 may calculate a position fix for the mobile station based, at least in part, on timing calibration parameters received through communication with one or more of base stations 132, 134, and/or 136, and further based, at least in part, on known position locations of the base stations. The mobile station may also make use of an estimated propagation delay for signals received from a base station source, a satellite source, or both.
In another aspect, position location determination calculations may be performed by a network entity such as, for example, location server 170 depicted in
A mobile switching center (MSC) 140 for this example may be coupled to base stations 132, 134, and 136, and may further couple to other systems and networks, such as a public switched telephone network (PSTN), a packet data serving node (PDSN) 160, and so on. MSC 140 for this example provides coordination and control for the base stations coupled to it and further controls the routing of data to/from the mobile stations served by these base stations. For the example depicted in
In one aspect, base station server 180 may provide BSA information to mobile station 200. Information to be included in the BSA provided to mobile station 200 may be a subset of BSA database 185 selected based at least in part upon any of a number of parameters. Of course, the amount of information provided to a mobile station may be limited due to storage capacity issues of the mobile station. In an aspect, base station almanac information delivered to mobile station 200 may comprise a sparse base station almanac, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
By nature, a base station almanac such as BSA 185 may contain information that does not often change. However, in one aspect, cellular network 120 for this example may alert mobile station 200 that revised BSA information is available in the event cellular network 120 is modified in a way that warrants alerting the mobile station. Mobile station 200 may request revised BSA information at least in part in response to receiving such an alert from BSA database server 180. In one aspect, additional and/or new fix database information may be made available by way of the base station almanac, and the availability of such information may trigger, in one example, an alert to the mobile stations that revised BSA information is available.
In one example, a mobile station such as mobile station 200 may estimate its position based, at least in part, on timing information received from an SPS, and also based, at least in part, on signals received from SVs, such as satellites. In particular, such a device and/or system may obtain “pseudorange” measurements comprising approximations of distances between associated satellites and a navigation satellite receiver. To estimate its position, a mobile station such as mobile station 200 may obtain pseudorange measurements to three or more satellites based upon transmissions from the satellites, as well as based on positions of the satellites at time of transmitting. A satellite's position at a point in time may be calculated based, at least in part, on the satellite's known or estimated orbital parameters. Mobile station 200 in another aspect may perform dead reckoning navigation operations based on sensor data to track the position of mobile station 200 in circumstances where mobile station 200 is not able to receive transmissions from SVs to perform position fixes.
Just as knowing an SV's orbital parameters and the SPS' timing information may allow a mobile station to estimate its position location, having accurate information, such as, for example, accurate position information, regarding base stations may also allow the mobile station to more quickly and accurately estimate its position. In an aspect, a mobile station may estimate its location based, at least in part, on signal propagation delay information gathered through communications with one or more base stations in a wireless network and further based, at least in part, on known position locations of the one or more base stations. As used herein, the term “propagation delay information” is meant to include any information related to propagation times for signals, such as between a mobile station and a base station. Such information may comprise round trip delay estimates, for example. Such information may further comprise, for another example, information related to an observed time difference of arrival for signals between different base stations and the mobile station, for example. For another example, such propagation delay information may comprise information related to downlink timing adjustments. However, these are merely examples of propagation delay information types, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in these respects.
Further, as used herein, the term “known position location” as it relates to base stations in a wireless network is meant to include any information that may identify physical locations of the base stations. In one implementation, such known position location information for one or more base stations may be stored in a position determination entity in a wireless network, and/or may be stored in any of a wide range of other resources in the wireless network, as more fully described below. For an additional example, known position location information for one or more base stations may be stored in a mobile station. Further, for an example, known position location may comprise longitude and latitude, and may for another example comprise altitude information. However, these are merely examples of known position location, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. In another aspect, some base stations may broadcast their locations, and such location information may be stored in one or more databases in the mobile station. Such base station location information may be shared with other network entities, such as an assistance server, for example. Further, in another aspect, the accuracy of the broadcasted location information for any particular base station may not be known. Techniques for estimating a location for the transmitting base station may be utilized to check the trustworthiness of the broadcasted information. For example, if a number of estimated locations for the base station are determined by a number of mobile stations, and the estimated locations largely correlate with the broadcasted location, the broadcasted location may be considered to be accurate.
The information in base station almanac 355 may comprise measurements and/or other information obtained from signals received from various base stations at one or more mobile stations such as mobile stations 322 and 324 during position fix operations. As previously mentioned, such position fix information may be stored in either a cell database or a fix database in a memory of a mobile station. In one or more example implementations, a mobile station may comprise both a cell database and a fix database, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
A fix database, for example, may comprise a number of entries, wherein the individual entries correspond to individual position fix operations performed by a mobile station at a point in time at a location. As is explained in more detail below, fix database entries may be assigned a fix score that may be used in determining which information to transmit to a mobile station or for a mobile station to determine whether to discard an entry of the fix database. In another aspect, a fix database may incorporate a first-in, first out priority scheme for storing fix database entries. For the first-in, first-out priority scheme, information from more recent position fixes are assigned priorities higher than for information from less recent position fixes. Of course, the first-in, first-out priority scheme is merely an example priority scheme, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
A cell database, for one example, may comprise a number of entries, wherein the individual entries correspond to individual base station transmitters and/or cells from which one or more signals are received by a mobile station in the course of performing position fix operations. Any of a number of techniques may be utilized in determining which information to store in the cell database and in determining which information to discard in the event that a maximum size for the cell database is reached. In one example, more recent entries may be given higher priority than less recent entries, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
For the example of
In another aspect, assistance server 350 may receive local cell and/or fix databases from mobile stations such as mobile stations 322 and 324. Assistance server 350 may pass the information received from the mobile stations to data manager 360. As previously mentioned, in an aspect, data manager 360 may consolidate information received from a variety of sources. For example, a number of mobile stations may store position fix information in their respective cell and/or fix databases, and may gather such information over a period of time. Data manager 360 may receive and combine this information from a number of sources to make adjustments according to confidence factors supplied with the fix information, in one example aspect. Types of position fix information that may be provided to assistance server 350 from mobile stations may include, but are not limited to, phase and/or timing relationships, measures of signal strength, residual errors from the mobile station's position, and/or clock bias estimates, to list but a few examples. Such information may come from data already available from the wireless modem for communications purposes, such as the information found in an IS-2000 Pilot Strength Measurement Message or messages with similar purposes for Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) or Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) networks, for example. In another aspect, data manager 360 may implement algorithms to derive more accurate position fixes and to reduce uncertainty for cell information in a base station almanac.
Although
Although the example of
In another aspect, once a mobile station has uploaded its fix and/or cell database to assistance server 350 and/or to data manager 360, the fix and/or cell database storage may be cleared, allowing the mobile station to begin collecting fix information anew, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. Also, any of a wide range of air interfaces may be supported by the techniques described herein. For example, supported air interfaces may include, but are not limited to, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Global System for Mobile communications (GSM), WiFi, lx, Evolution Data-Optimized (EVDO), and Long Term Evolution (LTE). Mobile television air interfaces may also be supported, including but not limited to MFLO, Digital Video Broadcasting-Handheld (DVB-H), Terrestrial Digital Multimedia Broadcast (TDMB), Satellite Digital Multimedia Broadcasting (SDMB), etc. Similarly, the techniques described herein may utilized with Bluetooth systems, Terrestrial TV, FM and local transaction and/or payment sources. However, these are merely example communications systems that may be utilized with the example techniques described herein, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in these respects.
For yet another example, the determination of whether to include information for a given group of transmitters in the base station almanac information to be provided to a mobile station may be made conditionally, based at least in part on an availability of storage space in the receiving mobile station. In one example, position fix information provided to mobile stations may comprise a file of about 50 kB, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
In some examples described herein, a mobile station such as mobile station 322 is described as requesting BSA information from an assistance server such as server 350. In response to receiving the request from mobile station 322, assistance server 350 may configure the appropriate information and deliver it to the mobile station. However, there may be a number of variations to these examples, in that there may be various techniques to communicate base station almanac information to mobile station 322. In some cases, the technique used may depend at least in part on the type of air interface. In some air interfaces, the transmitting entity may also be able to store and forward its own BSA information or that of its neighbors. For example, referring to
In an additional aspect, a mobile station may be expected to report a specified amount of information to an assistance server, for example, in exchange for more complete base station almanac information. Position fix information gathered and reported by the mobile station may comprise a series of locations along with respective location uncertainties, and may further comprise attributes of base stations observed and/or determined by the mobile station from those locations. Such observed and/or determined attributes might include base station identification information, for example, as well as position information, signal frequency, relative and/or absolute signal strength, color coding, slot timing, and/or any other pertinent information that may help the assistance server or other network entity to map the coverage area of the individual transmitters. The attributes may further include code phase for individual transmitters, and/or timing relationships between some standard timing source (such as SPS time) and the framing structure of one or more received signals. This information may be stored in a database internal to the mobile device. The database may be organized to store a list of positions and their associated measurements or it may be organized as an almanac of statistics for known transmitters and their respective identifiers, positions, and/or service areas.
In another aspect, a priority scheme may be used to determine whether to store the additional fix information, for example in situations where a maximum database size has been reached and where one or more database entries would need to be removed from the database in order to accommodate the additional information. For one example priority scheme, fix information related to more recent position fixes may be given a higher priority than fix information related to less recent position fixes. In such a case, the additional fix information determined at block 640 would be stored in the fix and/or cell database, and if a maximum database size would be exceeded with the inclusion of the additional fix information, fix information related to the least recent position fix represented in the database may be removed to make room for the additional fix information. Of course, this is merely an example priority scheme, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. At block 660, signals representative of at least a subset of the additional fix information may be transmitted to an assistance server. In an aspect, an entire cell and/or fix database may be transmitted from the mobile device to the assistance server. In other examples, subsets of the information stored in the fix and/or cell database may be transmitted. Examples in accordance with claimed subject matter may include all, less than, or more than blocks 610-660. Further, the order of blocks 610-660 is merely an example order, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
As previously mentioned, as a mobile station obtains measurement information from wireless signals encountered from various transmitters, and/or as broadcasted transmitter locations are received from various transmitters, decisions may be made to decide which information to add to a fix database and/or a cell database that may have a specified maximum size due to limited storage capacity. For example, it may be advantageous to keep the size of a fix database at 50 kB or less, in one example implementation. Of course, this is merely an example storage capacity, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. Of course, the size of the fix database and/or cell database may vary from implementation to implementation, as various mobile stations may vary in their capabilities and/or requirements. In one example implementation, a fix database may be at least large enough to hold information related to at least 256 fixes. In another aspect, a maximum number of fixes may also be specified. For example, a fix database may have a maximum of 1000 fixes, in one example implementation. Alternatively, as previously alluded to, the maximum may be expressed as a maximum file size, such as the previous example of 50 kB.
In another aspect, if a mobile station periodically receives predicted orbital information for an SPS system, base station almanac information may also be delivered at approximately the same time. In another aspect, the SPS information and the base station almanac information may comprise the same data file, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. Possible advantages of integrating the SPS and base station almanac information downloads into a single download may be seen in terms of reducing the number of connection setups that may be required as well as centralizing the symbiotic relationship between uploads and downloads.
As previously mentioned, a priority scheme may be utilized to determine which fix information to store in a fix database in the event of limited storage capacity for the fix database. The limited storage capacity may be based, in one example, on a specified maximum file size. In another example, limited storage capacity may be due to a finite size of a memory device in a mobile station. In an aspect, fix information related to horizontal estimated position error (HEPE) may be relatively valuable information, as a fix with a lower error estimate may be given more weight than one with a higher error estimate, and therefore may be assigned a higher priority. Another type of possibly valuable fix information may comprise the number of transmitters of interest observed during a position fix operation. It may be more efficient to provide fix information for large numbers of transmitters referenced to a single position. Furthermore, in an interference-limited system, those fixes with a greater number of terrestrial measurements are likely to be closer to the edge of a transmitter's coverage area, thus helping to more effectively define the limits of a transmitter's service area.
In a further aspect, a higher weight in the priority scheme may be given to new transmitters, meaning transmitters for which little or no information is currently available. For example, if a mobile station has stored in its memory base station almanac information that does not include information related to a base station observed by the mobile station in the course of performing a position fix for the mobile station, the mobile station may assign a high priority to storing information related to this base station so that an assistance server or other network entity may incorporate information gleaned from the base station in a future version of a base station almanac. Similarly, relatively high weight may also be given to transmitters whose almanac information is not considered to be reliable, or where a confidence factor is below a threshold level. On the other hand, transmitters whose almanac information is considered to be reliable and/or accurately reported may be given a low priority in the priority scheme, since it may be less important to gather information related to transmitters whose almanac information is already accurately recorded. However, it is possible for almanac information to change, or for transmitter characteristics to change. Therefore, it may still be of value to gather information for such transmitters, although at a lower priority, for the present example.
For one example of a priority scheme for determining which fix information to store in a fix database, measurements related to particular position fixes may be assigned an “independence score”. For measurements related to transmitters with highly accurate or reliable base station almanac information available such as, for example, an antenna location for a transmitter that is believed to be accurate within a specified margin of error, the independence score may be assigned a value of 0 for this example. If accurate or reliable almanac information is not available for the transmitter from which the measurements originate, the independence score for an associated measurement may be given according to the following:
Independence Score=(ΔP/MAR)*(ΔT/10 min) (1)
wherein ΔP comprises a smaller of a distance to a prior position fix and a distance to a following position fix, and wherein ΔT comprises a shortest time between the fix associated with the additional fix information and the neighboring fixes. Of course, equation (1) is merely an example of how an independence score may be calculated, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. In an aspect, a goal of the scoring techniques described herein may be to select a subset of fixes that may provide an independent view, both in time and in space, of the network. Therefore, the scoring technique may be useful in selecting the least independent fixes for removal from the list or database to make room for a new, more independent fix. In another example, the independence score may be calculated to maximize either temporal or spatial diversity. In one aspect, the emphasis may be shifted to give one of the two elements of temporal and spatial diversity more weight than the other. It may also be desirable, in a further aspect, to utilize different independence scoring techniques for different radio access types, or as an adaptation for different networks.
In a further aspect, and continuing the present example priority scheme, a “need score” is also determined for the fix measurements. This example scoring mechanism may be utilized to quantify the relative need for keeping one fix over another, based at least in part upon a current state of a base station almanac entry for a given measurement. The need score for this example may be based on the origins of the base station almanac, and/or a confidence in the almanac information. For the present example, if the base station almanac is provided by a trusted source, the need score for the particular fix measurement is assigned the integer value of 0. If a base station almanac entry associated with the transmitter that is the subject of the fix measurement under consideration is understood with relatively great statistical significance, the need score is assigned an integer value of 1, for this example. In the event the base station almanac information indicates a known coverage area, but more information is desired, the need score is assigned the integer value of 2. On the other hand, if the base station almanac information is labeled as unreliable or is absent altogether, the need score is assigned a value of 10.
For the present example, independence scores and need scores may be utilized to generate a fix score for particular entries of the fix database, and for any potential new addition to the fix database. In one aspect, the fix score may be calculated as follows:
Fix Score=sum(Independence Scores for all measurements associated with a particular fix)*sum(Need scores for all measurements associated with a particular fix)/HEPE (2)
where HEPE is the horizontal estimated position error associated with the particular fix.
In another aspect, a fix score for a potential addition to the fix database may be compared with fix scores for entries already included in the fix database. In one example, if any of the fix scores in the fix database are lower than a fix score for candidate fix information entry, the candidate fix information entry may be added to the fix database and the database entry with the lowest fix score may be discarded. In another aspect, if a fix information entry is removed from a fix database to make room for a new fix information entry, the neighboring fix information entries of the removed fix information entry are linked and their fix scores may be recalculated. For one or more embodiments, fixes that are neighbors in time, or perhaps space, would have their fix scores updated. Further, as used herein, the term “linked” as it applies to fix information entries herein may imply an association between fixes, perhaps as in a linked list or a neighbor list which might be kept for each sector, for one example embodiment. However, it should be noted that the priority scheme described above is merely an example, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. Other example implementations may use other schemes for determining which fix information to include in a fix database.
As previously mentioned, base station almanac information may be incomplete, in that the base station almanac may not have information related to the identity and/or location of at least some transmitters. Also, even if information for all transmitters is gathered at a point in time, many of such transmitters may not remain stationary, and much of the base station almanac information may become inaccurate and/or stale. One example situation of where a base station almanac may be more likely to lack accurate information is where a relatively large number of access points are located in the interior of one or more buildings. Such access points may be associated with WLAN networks, for example, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. The large number of such access points may make it more difficult to gather identity and location information for those access points. Also, inside of a building, mobile stations may not receive SPS signals. Therefore, position location operations that utilize SPS signals may not be possible, making it more difficult to determine a position of an access point once such an access point is identified by a mobile station.
Because many access points may be located inside buildings where SPS service may not be available, alternative techniques for performing position fixes and for determining locations of access points encountered by a mobile station may be advantageous. For one or more example techniques, an altitude for an access point may be determined along with latitude and longitude. Determining an altitude for an access point may allow the access point to be associated with a particular floor of the building in which the access point resides. Such information may prove useful, for example, in emergency situations where first responders may utilize the information to locate fires and/or other emergency conditions on particular floors. Of course, floor information may be useful in a number of other ways, including aiding information technology personnel to locate particular access points when maintaining a network. Further, such altitude information may further help make future position fixes for mobile stations more accurate.
In an aspect, assume that a user carries mobile station 200 into building 710, and that the user rides an elevator from the ground floor to the second floor. Mobile station 200 may perform dead reckoning calculations to estimate a change in elevation experienced as mobile station 200 moved from the ground floor to the second floor. Such measurements may incur cumulative errors. However, if the distance between two floors of building 710 is known, one may adjust the estimated change in elevation calculated by mobile station 200 to compensate for the accumulated errors. For the present example, the vertical distance between floors of building 710 is labeled in
In one or more aspects, mobile station 200 may determine an estimated initial position. Such a position may be the last position determined with the aid of SPS signals before mobile station 200 enters building 710. Upon losing reception of the SPS signals, mobile station 200 may commence dead reckoning calculations and may make relatively frequent adjustments to the estimated location based at least in part on the dead reckoning operations, in one example implementation. Also, as previously mentioned and as explained in more detail below, displacement tracking for latitude, longitude, and altitude may be initiated at a reference position, which for some example implementations may not be the last known position determined with the help of SPS signals. For example, in one or more examples that will be described below, displacement tracking operations may utilize a location within building 710 from which mobile station 200 observes an access point as a reference. In such a situation, latitude, longitude, and altitude displacement information may be reset to zero, and mobile station 200 may commence displacement tracking operations from that spot. Mobile station may utilize the tracked displacement information to calculate an estimated position for the access point at least in part in response to mobile station 200 gaining access to SPS signals so that a relatively accurate position fix may be performed for mobile station 200.
In order to perform displacement tracking operations or dead reckoning navigation operations, mobile station 200 may comprise one or more sensors. In one or more example implementations, the one or more sensors may be incorporated into an inertial measurement unit such as IMU 270, although the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
The one or more sensor incorporated into mobile station 200, whether packaged in an IMU or whether implemented as separate components, may comprise any of a range of sensor types. A variety of sensors may be available to support a number of applications. These sensors may convert physical phenomena into analog and/or electrical signals. Such sensors may include, for example, an accelerometer. An accelerometer may sense the direction of gravity and any other force experienced by the sensor. The accelerometer may be used to sense linear and/or angular movement, and may also be used, for example, to measure tilt and/or roll. Yet another sensor type may include a gyroscope which measures the Coriolis effect and may be used in applications measuring heading changes or in measuring rate of rotation.
Another sensor type may include a barometric pressure sensor. A barometric pressure sensor may be used to measure atmospheric pressure. Applications for the barometric pressure sensor may include determining altitude. Other applications may include observing atmospheric pressure as it relates to weather conditions.
Another type of sensor may include a magnetic field sensor that may measure the strength of a magnetic field and, correspondingly, the direction of a magnetic field. A compass is an example of a magnetic field sensor. The compass may find use in determining absolute heading in car and pedestrian navigation applications.
In one example implementation of a technique for determining position information for an access point within a building where no SPS signals are available to help with position fix operations, a mobile station equipped with one or more sensors may be utilized. Such sensors may comprise, for example, an accelerometer and/or a gyroscope, to name merely two examples. The mobile station may track latitude, longitude, and altitude displacement information to and/or from a reference point such as a spot with the building where the mobile station observes the access point. The mobile station may utilize the displacement information to estimate a position for the access point based at least in part on a position fix performed with the aid of SPS signals or performed in some other manner that may provide the mobile station with a relatively accurate position fix. Base station almanac information may be updated with the estimated position of the access point so that in the future, the identity and position of the access point may be utilized by other mobile stations to perform position fix operations. Without relatively accurate position information for the access point, position fix operations for a mobile station may not be successfully completed. In another aspect, in order to increase the accuracy of the position estimate for the access point, an individual mobile station may calculate a number of estimated positions for the access point as the mobile station revisits the area of the access point. Further, a number of mobile stations may perform one or more position estimates for the access point in the manner described herein, and the various estimates may be used to calculate a more accurate estimate. In another aspect, individual mobile stations may utilize the more accurate position estimate to determine a bias in the mobile station's sensors so that future tracking operations may provide more accurate displacement values.
As discussed previously, position fix information may be gathered by a number of mobile stations, and such information may be provided to a network. The network may utilize the gathered information to update base station almanac information, and at least a portion of such updated information may be provided to one or more mobile stations to enable the mobile stations to perform more efficient and accurate position fixes. In an aspect, the gathered position fix information may include access point estimated location information determined through the use of sensors and displacement tracking as described herein. In this manner, the large numbers of access points that are located within buildings where SPS signals and/or other signals may not be available for position fix operations may be identified and their estimated locations included in base station almanac information provided to mobile stations from the network. Sensor systems, including discrete sensors and/or IMUs, used in displacement tracking operations in an aspect need not be highly accurate in at least some example implementations since information from a number of mobile stations may be collectively utilized to estimate a position of an access point and to update the base station almanac database. Also, a number of estimates may be performed by an individual mobile station, and the various estimates may be used to determine a more accurate estimate and also to determine a bias for the sensors so that future tracking operations may yield more accurate displacement values. Less accurate sensor systems may have the potential advantages of lower cost and smaller, simpler designs. Base station almanac databases that may be updated and/or maintained through the example techniques described herein may include, but are not limited to, cellular network databases and Wi-Fi/WLAN network databases. Of course, the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect, and the example processes described herein may be utilized to update and/or maintain databases related to any type of transmitter for any type of wireless network.
In an aspect, if a mobile phone attempts to perform a position fix using a Wi-Fi/WLAN network and observes an access point that is not included in a Wi-Fi/WLAN network database, the mobile station may attempt to update the Wi-Fi/WLAN network database with that access point's identification and mobile station's current location. However, if the mobile station tries to use the Wi-Fi/WLAN network for a position fix in a location where there is no SPS coverage and if the Wi-Fi/WLAN network database does not include a record for the observed access point, the position fix using the Wi-Fi/WLAN network will fail to give the mobile station its current location, and the position fix operation initiated by the mobile station will fail. However, if the Wi-Fi/WLAN network database is updated with a record mapping this access point and its estimated position, future attempts to use the Wi-Fi/WLAN network to perform position fixes for mobile stations at this location will result in successful position fixes.
Continuing with the example process depicted in
For the period of time in which the mobile station does not move closer to the access point and in which there is no SPS coverage, the process cycles through blocks 920, 925, 930, and 935. Of course, for the present example process, if the mobile station is determined to have moved closer to the access point than the current access point observation position, the process returns to block 915 wherein the latitude, longitude, and altitude displacement tracking operations begin anew, with the displacement values being nulled or cleared to values of zero. At some point in time, the mobile station may have access to an SPS system, for example if the mobile station exits the building, and the mobile station may perform a position fix utilizing SPS signals, as depicted at blocks 935 and 940. At block 940, the SPS position fix may be performed for the mobile station, and the tracked displacement values for latitude, longitude, and altitude from the access point observation position may be utilized to calculate an estimated position for the access point. In an aspect, the latitude, longitude, and altitude displacement values may be subtracted from the latitude, longitude, and altitude values from the SPS position fix for the mobile station. The calculated position for the access point may be used to update a base station almanac database. In another aspect, the base station almanac may further be updated with the access point identification information previously stored in memory in the mobile station. The scope of claimed subject matter may include all of, less than, or more than boxes 905-945 depicted in
With respect to the example process depicted in
At block 1025, a determination may be made as to whether the mobile station has gained the ability to perform a position fix. For example, the mobile station may have moved to a location where SPS signals may be received. If it is determined that the mobile station has the ability to perform a position fix, the process moves back to block 1005. As indicated at block 1005, a new position fix is obtained for the mobile station, and the new position fix is stored as the last known successful position fix at block 1010. As depicted at block 1015, the last known successful position fix location is used as the reference position for the displacement operations that begin anew, with the latitude, longitude and altitude displacement values being nulled or cleared to a value of zero. If at block 1025 it is determined that the mobile station is not capable of performing a position fix, the process moves to block 1030 where the latitude, longitude, and altitude displacement tracking operations are depicted.
In an aspect of the present example process, the operations of blocks 1020, 1025, 1030, and 1035 may be repeated in a cycle that may be broken either by the mobile station gaining the ability to perform a position fix at block 1025 or the mobile station observing an access point with either no geographical mapping information in the base station almanac database or with geographical mapping information with a lesser degree of confidence of sufficient accuracy in the base station almanac database, as depicted at block 1035. If an access point is observed by the mobile station, the tracked latitude, longitude, and altitude displacements may be utilized to calculate an estimated position of the access point. For example, the displacement values may be added to the position coordinates for the last known successful position fix to obtain the estimated position of the access point. Of course, the closer the mobile station is to the access point when the tracking operations are ceased, the more accurate the estimated position for the access point will be.
At least in part in response to calculating the estimated position for the observed access point, a database may be updated at block 1045 with the calculated position of the access point. The database may further be updated with identification information for the access point. The scope of claimed subject matter may include all of, less than, or more than boxes 1005-1045 depicted in
In another aspect, in order to obtain a relatively accurate position estimate for the access point, the access point may be observed by the mobile station at multiple locations. The mobile station may determine which of the observation locations is likely to be closest to the access point, and may obtain estimated positions for the individual observation locations. At least in part in response to the mobile station determining which information from which observation point is likely to provide the most accurate result, the mobile station may transmit the position fix information to a network entity and the database may be updated. By waiting until the mobile station has found an observation point that seems to be closest to the transmitter, multiple write operations to the database may be avoided.
In another aspect, rather than updating the appropriate database in response to an estimation of a position of an access point from a single mobile station, a network entity, perhaps a database server such as BSA database server 180 depicted in
In another aspect, mobile stations implemented with SPS position fix capabilities and sensor-based displacement tracking capabilities may provide advantages related to database efficiency. For example, accurate position fixes performed using SPS signals may be combined with latitude, longitude, and altitude displacement tracking information provided at least in part by sensors of a mobile station to provide position fixes for the mobile station in areas where no SPS signals are available. For this example, no Wi-Fi access point signals are utilized to perform the position fix. Therefore, in an example implementation, it may not be necessary to gather and store information related to Wi-Fi access points in a base station almanac, because such information would not be required by mobile stations supporting SPS/sensor position fix operations in order to perform such operations. By eliminating or reducing the amount of information related to Wi-Fi access points gathered for a base station almanac, for example, the effort involved in creating the almanac is reduced, along with the size of the almanac. Of course, these are merely examples of how sensor data may be used advantageously in conjunction with position fix operations, and the scope of claimed subject matter is not limited in these respects.
A baseband processor 1160 may be adapted to provide baseband information from a central processing unit (CPU) 1120 to transceiver 1170 for transmission over a wireless communications link. Here, CPU 1120 may obtain such baseband information from an input device within a user interface 1110. Baseband processor 1160 may also be adapted to provide baseband information from transceiver 1170 to CPU 1120 for transmission through an output device within user interface 1110.
In another aspect, for this example implementation, mobile station 1100 may comprise an inertial measurement unit (IMU) 1190. IMU 1190 may comprise one or more sensors. Example types of sensors that may be incorporated into IMU 1190 include, but are not limited to, an accelerator and a gyroscope, although claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
User interface 1110 may comprise a plurality of devices for inputting or outputting user information such as voice or data. Such devices may include, by way of non-limiting examples, a keyboard, a display screen, a microphone, and a speaker.
A receiver 1180 may be adapted to receive and demodulate transmissions from an SPS, and provide demodulated information to correlator 1140. Correlator 1140 may be adapted to derive correlation functions from the information provided by receiver 1180. Correlator 1140 may also be adapted to derive pilot-related correlation functions from information relating to pilot signals provided by transceiver 1170. This information may be used by a mobile station to acquire wireless communications services. Channel decoder 1150 may be adapted to decode channel symbols received from baseband processor 1160 into underlying source bits. In one example where channel symbols comprise convolutionally encoded symbols, such a channel decoder may comprise a Viterbi decoder. In a second example, where channel symbols comprise serial or parallel concatenations of convolutional codes, channel decoder 1150 may comprise a turbo decoder.
A memory 1130 may be adapted to store machine-readable instructions which are executable to perform one or more of processes, implementations, or examples thereof which are described or suggested herein. CPU 1120 may be adapted to access and execute such machine-readable instructions. Memory 1130 for this example may also be adapted to store one or more of a fix database, a cell database, or base station almanac information.
First device 1202, second device 1204 and third device 1206, as shown in
Similarly, network 1208, as shown in
It is recognized that all or part of the various devices and networks shown in system 1200, and the processes and methods as further described herein, may be implemented using or otherwise including hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof.
Thus, by way of example but not limitation, second device 1204 may include at least one processing unit 1220 that is operatively coupled to a memory 1222 through a bus 1228.
Processing unit 1220 is representative of one or more circuits configurable to perform at least a portion of a data computing procedure or process. By way of example but not limitation, processing unit 1220 may include one or more processors, controllers, microprocessors, microcontrollers, application specific integrated circuits, digital signal processors, programmable logic devices, field programmable gate arrays, and the like, or any combination thereof.
Memory 1222 is representative of any data storage mechanism. Memory 1222 may include, for example, a primary memory 1224 and/or a secondary memory 1226. Primary memory 1224 may include, for example, a random access memory, read only memory, etc. While illustrated in this example as being separate from processing unit 1220, it should be understood that all or part of primary memory 1224 may be provided within or otherwise co-located/coupled with processing unit 1220.
Secondary memory 1226 may include, for example, the same or similar type of memory as primary memory and/or one or more data storage devices or systems, such as, for example, a disk drive, an optical disc drive, a tape drive, a solid state memory drive, etc. In certain implementations, secondary memory 1226 may be operatively receptive of, or otherwise configurable to couple to, a computer-readable medium 1240. Computer-readable medium 1240 may include, for example, any medium that can carry and/or make accessible data, code and/or instructions for one or more of the devices in system 1200. Computer readable medium 1240 may also be referred to as a storage medium.
Second device 1204 may include, for example, a communication interface 1230 that provides for or otherwise supports the operative coupling of second device 1204 to at least network 1208. By way of example but not limitation, communication interface 1230 may include a network interface device or card, a modem, a router, a switch, a transceiver, and the like.
Second device 1204 may include, for example, an input/output 1232. Input/output 1232 is representative of one or more devices or features that may be configurable to accept or otherwise introduce human and/or machine inputs, and/or one or more devices or features that may be configurable to deliver or otherwise provide for human and/or machine outputs. By way of example but not limitation, input/output device 1232 may include an operatively configured display, speaker, keyboard, mouse, trackball, touch screen, data port, etc.
The methodologies described herein may be implemented by various means depending upon applications according to particular examples. For example, such methodologies may be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. In a hardware implementation, for example, a processing unit may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, electronic devices, other devices units designed to perform the functions described herein, and/or combinations thereof.
“Instructions” as referred to herein relate to expressions which represent one or more logical operations. For example, instructions may be “machine-readable” by being interpretable by a machine for executing one or more operations on one or more data objects. However, this is merely an example of instructions and claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. In another example, instructions as referred to herein may relate to encoded commands which are executable by a processing circuit having a command set which includes the encoded commands. Such an instruction may be encoded in the form of a machine language understood by the processing circuit. Again, these are merely examples of an instruction and claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect.
“Storage medium” as referred to herein relates to media capable of maintaining expressions which are perceivable by one or more machines. For example, a storage medium may comprise one or more storage devices for storing machine-readable instructions and/or information. Such storage devices may comprise any one of several media types including, for example, magnetic, optical or semiconductor storage media. Such storage devices may also comprise any type of long term, short term, volatile or non-volatile memory devices. However, these are merely examples of a storage medium, and claimed subject matter is not limited in these respects.
Some portions of the detailed description included herein are presented in terms of algorithms or symbolic representations of operations on binary digital signals stored within a memory of a specific apparatus or special purpose computing device or platform. In the context of this particular specification, the term specific apparatus or the like includes a general purpose computer once it is programmed to perform particular operations pursuant to instructions from program software. Algorithmic descriptions or symbolic representations are examples of techniques used by those of ordinary skill in the signal processing or related arts to convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, is considered to be a self-consistent sequence of operations or similar signal processing leading to a desired result. In this context, operations or processing involve physical manipulation of physical quantities. Typically, although not necessarily, such quantities may take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared or otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to such signals as bits, data, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, numerals, or the like. It should be understood, however, that all of these or similar terms are to be associated with appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels. Unless specifically stated otherwise, as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout this specification discussions utilizing terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining” or the like refer to actions or processes of a specific apparatus, such as a special purpose computer or a similar special purpose electronic computing device. In the context of this specification, therefore, a special purpose computer or a similar special purpose electronic computing device is capable of manipulating or transforming signals, typically represented as physical electronic or magnetic quantities within memories, registers, or other information storage devices, transmission devices, or display devices of the special purpose computer or similar special purpose electronic computing device.
Wireless communication techniques described herein may be in connection with various wireless communication networks such as a wireless wide area network (WWAN), a wireless local area network (WLAN), a wireless personal area network (WPAN), and so on. The term “network” and “system” may be used interchangeably herein. A WWAN may be a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) network, a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) network, a Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) network, an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) network, a Single-Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) network, or any combination of the above networks, and so on. A CDMA network may implement one or more radio access technologies (RATs) such as cdma2000, Wideband-CDMA (W-CDMA), to name just a few radio technologies. Here, cdma2000 may include technologies implemented according to IS-95, IS-2000, and IS-856 standards. A TDMA network may implement Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone System (D-AMPS), or some other RAT. GSM and W-CDMA are described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP). Cdma2000 is described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” (3GPP2). 3GPP and 3GPP2 documents are publicly available. A WLAN may comprise an IEEE 802.11x network, and a WPAN may comprise a Bluetooth network, an IEEE 802.15x, for example. Wireless communication implementations described herein may also be used in connection with any combination of WWAN, WLAN and/or WPAN.
Techniques described herein may be used with any one or more of several SPS, including the aforementioned SPS, for example. Furthermore, such techniques may be used with positioning determination systems that utilize pseudolites or a combination of satellites and pseudolites. Pseudolites may comprise ground-based transmitters that broadcast a PRN code or other ranging code (e.g., similar to a GPS or CDMA cellular signal) modulated on an L-band (or other frequency) carrier signal, which may be synchronized with GPS time. Such a transmitter may be assigned a unique PRN code so as to permit identification by a remote receiver. Pseudolites may be useful in situations where SPS signals from an orbiting satellite might be unavailable, such as in tunnels, mines, buildings, urban canyons or other enclosed areas. Another implementation of pseudolites is known as radio-beacons. The term “satellite”, as used herein, is intended to include pseudolites, equivalents of pseudolites, and possibly others. The term “SPS signals”, as used herein, is intended to include SPS-like signals from pseudolites or equivalents of pseudolites.
The terms, “and,” “and/or,” and “or” as used herein may include a variety of meanings that will depend at least in part upon the context in which it is used. Typically, “and/or” as well as “or” if used to associate a list, such as A, B or C, is intended to mean A, B, and C, here used in the inclusive sense, as well as A, B or C, here used in the exclusive sense. Reference throughout this specification to “one example” or “an example” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the example is included in at least one example of claimed subject matter. Thus, the appearances of the phrase “in one example” or “an example” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in one or more examples. Examples described herein may include machines, devices, engines, or apparatuses that operate using digital signals. Such signals may comprise electronic signals, optical signals, electromagnetic signals, or any form of energy that provides information between locations.
While there has been illustrated and described what are presently considered to be example features, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various other modifications may be made, and equivalents may be substituted, without departing from claimed subject matter. Additionally, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation to the teachings of claimed subject matter without departing from the central concept described herein. Therefore, it is intended that claimed subject matter not be limited to the particular examples disclosed, but that such claimed subject matter may also include all aspects falling within the scope of the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
Claims
1. A method, comprising:
- receiving, at a server, fix information records associated with position estimations of a first plurality of mobile stations, wherein each received fix information record is associated with a corresponding mobile station position estimation and comprises measurements of one or more one or more wireless transmitter signals;
- computing, for each of the received fix information records, a corresponding fix score; and
- determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising storing the one or more fix information records in a network database according to a priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records is made.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the server comprises a network database server communicatively coupled to a wireless network.
4. The method of claim 2, further comprising determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit the one or more stored fix information records to a second plurality of mobile stations.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising transmitting the one or more stored fix information records according to the priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more stored fix information records is transmitted in response to requests for assistance data received at the server.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein, in response to each request for assistance data and prior to transmitting the one or more stored fix information records, the server specifies an amount of information to be included in each received fix information record.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the requests for assistance data and the responses to the requests for assistance data conform to one or more wireless positioning protocols.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the fix score is computed as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a mobile station position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
11. A server, comprising:
- a communications interface to receive fix information records associated with position estimations of a first plurality of mobile stations, wherein each received fix information record is associated with a corresponding mobile station position estimation and comprises measurements of one or more one or more wireless transmitter signals; and
- a processor coupled to the communications interface, wherein the processor is configured to:
- compute, for each of the received fix information records, a corresponding fix score; and
- determine, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records.
12. The server of claim 11, further comprising:
- storage coupled to the processor, the storage comprising a network database, and
- wherein the processor is further configured to: store the one or more fix information records in the network database according to a priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records is made.
13. The server of claim 12, wherein the server further comprises a network database server coupled to the network database and communicatively coupled to a wireless network.
14. The server of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to:
- determine, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit the one or more stored fix information records to a second plurality of mobile stations.
15. The server of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to:
- initiate the transmission of the one or more stored fix information records according to the priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
16. The server of claim 15, wherein the processor initiates the transmission of the one or more stored fix information records in response to requests for assistance data received at the server.
17. The server of claim 16, wherein, prior to initiating the transmission of the one or more stored fix information records, the processor is configured to:
- specify, in response to each request for assistance data, an amount of information to be included in each received fix information record.
18. The server of claim 16, wherein the requests for assistance data and the responses to the requests for assistance data conform to one or more wireless positioning protocols.
19. The server of claim 18, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
20. The server of claim 11, wherein the processor is configured to:
- compute the fix score as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a mobile station position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
21. A server, comprising:
- communications interface means, the communications interface means to receive fix information records associated with position estimations of a first plurality of mobile stations, wherein each received fix information record is associated with a corresponding mobile station position estimation and comprises measurements of one or more one or more wireless transmitter signals;
- means for computing, for each of the received fix information records, a corresponding fix score; and
- means for determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records.
22. The server of claim 21, further comprising:
- storage means coupled to the means for determining, the storage comprising a network database, the storage means to store the one or more fix information records in the network database according to a priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records is made.
23. The server of claim 22, wherein the storage means comprises network database server means, the network database server means coupled to the network database and communicatively coupled to a wireless network.
24. The server of claim 22, further comprising:
- means for determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit the one or more stored fix information records to a second plurality of mobile stations.
25. The server of claim 24, further comprising:
- means for initiating the transmission of the one or more stored fix information records according to the priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
26. The server of claim 25, wherein the means for initiating the transmission of the one or more stored fix information records initiates the transmission in response to requests for assistance data received at the server.
27. The server of claim 26, further comprising:
- means for specifying, prior to initiating the transmission of the one or more stored fix information records, and in response to each request for assistance data, an amount of information to be included in each received fix information record.
28. The server of claim 26, wherein the requests for assistance data and the responses to the requests for assistance data conform to one or more wireless positioning protocols.
29. The server of claim 28, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
30. The server of claim 21, further comprising:
- means for computing the fix score as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a mobile station position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
31. A computer-readable medium comprising instructions, which, when executed by a processor, perform a method comprising:
- receiving, at a server, fix information records associated with position estimations of a first plurality of mobile stations, wherein each received fix information record is associated with a corresponding mobile station position estimation and comprises measurements of one or more one or more wireless transmitter signals;
- computing, for each of the received fix information records, a corresponding fix score; and
- determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records.
32. The computer-readable medium of claim 31, further comprising storing the one or more fix information records in a network database according to a priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records is made.
33. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, wherein the server comprises a network database server communicatively coupled to a wireless network.
34. The computer-readable medium of claim 32, further comprising determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit the one or more stored fix information records to a second plurality of mobile stations.
35. The computer-readable medium of claim 34, further comprising transmitting the one or more stored fix information records according to the priority scheme for the fix information records, when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
36. The computer-readable medium of claim 35, wherein the one or more stored fix information records is transmitted in response to requests for assistance data received at the server.
37. The computer-readable medium of claim 36, wherein, in response to each request for assistance data and prior to transmitting the one or more stored fix information records, the server specifies an amount of information to be included in each received fix information record.
38. The computer-readable medium of claim 36, wherein the requests for assistance data and the responses to the requests for assistance data conform to one or more wireless positioning protocols.
39. The computer-readable medium of claim 38, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
40. The computer-readable medium of claim 31, wherein the fix score is computed as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a mobile station position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
41. A method, comprising:
- generating, at a mobile station (MS), one or more fix information records, wherein each fix information record is associated with a corresponding position estimation of the MS and comprises measurements of one or more wireless transmitter signals;
- compute a distinct score associated with each fix information record in a subset of the generated fix information records; and
- determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit at least one fix information record in the subset.
42. The method of claim 41, further comprising:
- transmitting at least one fix information record in the subset into a network when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
43. The method of claim 41, wherein the determination to transmit the at least one fix information record in the subset is made, based, in part, on a comparison of the distinct score of the at least one fix information record with scores of stored fix information records in the MS.
44. The method of claim 41, wherein the at least one fix information record is transmitted as part of one or more wireless positioning protocols.
45. The method of claim 44, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
46. The method of claim 41, wherein, an amount of information in each transmitted fix information record is specified by a network entity.
47. The method of claim 41, further comprising:
- determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records in the subset on the MS.
48. The method of claim 47, further comprising:
- storing the one or more fix information records in the subset on the MS according to a priority scheme for the one or more fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records in the subset is made.
49. The method of claim 41, wherein the fix score is computed as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a MS position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
50. The method of claim 40, wherein the wireless transmitter signals comprise one or more of femtocell, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Bluetooth, Satellite Positioning System (SPS), and cellular transmitter signals.
51. A mobile station (MS), comprising:
- a receiver to receive one or more wireless signals from one or more wireless transmitters;
- a processor coupled to the receiver, wherein the processor is configured to: generate one or more fix information records, wherein each fix information record is associated with a corresponding position estimation of the MS and comprises measurements of one or more wireless transmitter signals; compute a distinct score associated with each fix information record in a subset of the generated fix information records; and determine, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit at least one fix information record in the subset.
52. The MS of claim 51, further comprising:
- a transmitter, a transmitter coupled to the processor, the transmitter to transmit at least one fix information record in the subset into a network when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
53. The MS of claim 51, wherein the determination to transmit the at least one fix information record in the subset is made, based, in part, on a comparison of the distinct score of the at least one fix information record with scores of stored fix information records in the MS.
54. The MS of claim 51, wherein the transmitter transmits the at least one fix information record as in conformance with one or more wireless positioning protocols.
55. The MS of claim 54, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
56. The MS of claim 51, wherein, an amount of information in each transmitted fix information record is specified by a network entity.
57. The MS of claim 51, wherein the processor is further configured to:
- determine, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records in the subset.
58. The MS of claim 57, further comprising:
- a memory coupled to the processor, wherein the processor is configured to store the one or more fix information records in the subset in the memory according to a priority scheme for the one or more fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records in the subset is made.
59. The MS of claim 51, wherein the processor is configured to compute the fix score as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a MS position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
60. The MS of claim 51, wherein the receiver is capable of receiving wireless transmitter signals comprising one or more of femtocell, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Bluetooth, Satellite Positioning System (SPS), and cellular transmitter signals.
61. A mobile station (MS), comprising:
- receiving means for receiving one or more wireless signals from one or more wireless transmitters;
- means for generating one or more fix information records coupled to the receiving means, wherein each generated fix information record is associated with a corresponding position estimation of the MS and comprises measurements of one or more wireless transmitter signals;
- means for computing a distinct score associated with each fix information record in a subset of the generated fix information records; and
- means for determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit at least one fix information record in the subset.
62. The MS of claim 61, further comprising:
- transmitting means coupled to the means for determining, the transmitting means to transmit at least one fix information record in the subset into a network when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
63. The MS of claim 61, wherein the determination to transmit the at least one fix information record in the subset is made, based, in part, on a comparison of the distinct score of the at least one fix information record with scores of stored fix information records in the MS.
64. The MS of claim 61, wherein the transmitting means transmits the at least one fix information record as in conformance with one or more wireless positioning protocols.
65. The MS of claim 64, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
66. The MS of claim 61, wherein, an amount of information in each transmitted fix information record is specified by a network entity.
67. The MS of claim 61, further comprising:
- means for determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records in the subset.
68. The MS of claim 67, further comprising:
- storage means coupled to the means for determining whether to store one or more fix information records in the subset, the storage means to store the one or more fix information records in the subset in the storage means according to a priority scheme for the one or more fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records in the subset is made.
69. The MS of claim 61, wherein the processor is configured to compute the fix score as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a MS position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
70. The MS of claim 61, wherein the receiving means is capable of receiving wireless transmitter signals comprising one or more of femtocell, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Bluetooth, Satellite Positioning System (SPS), and cellular transmitter signals.
71. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions, which when executed by a processor perform steps in a method, the steps comprising:
- generating, at a mobile station (MS), one or more fix information records, wherein each fix information record is associated with a corresponding position estimation of the MS and comprises measurements of one or more wireless transmitter signals;
- compute a distinct score associated with each fix information record in a subset of the generated fix information records; and
- determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to transmit at least one fix information record in the subset.
72. The computer-readable medium of claim 71, further comprising:
- transmitting at least one fix information record in the subset into a network when a determination to transmit the one or more fix information records is made.
73. The computer-readable medium of claim 71, wherein the determination to transmit the at least one fix information record in the subset is made, based, in part, on a comparison of the distinct score of the at least one fix information record with scores of stored fix information records in the MS.
74. The computer-readable medium of claim 71, wherein the at least one fix information record is transmitted as part of one or more wireless positioning protocols.
75. The computer-readable medium of claim 74, wherein the one or more wireless positioning protocols are based on at least one of Long Term Evolution (LTE), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), CDMA 2000, or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) standards.
76. The computer-readable medium of claim 71, wherein, an amount of information in each transmitted fix information record is specified by a network entity.
77. The computer-readable medium of claim 71, further comprising:
- determining, based, at least in part, on the corresponding fix scores, whether to store one or more fix information records in the subset on the MS.
78. The computer-readable medium of claim 77, further comprising:
- storing the one or more fix information records in the subset on the MS according to a priority scheme for the one or more fix information records, when a determination to store the one or more fix information records in the subset is made.
79. The computer-readable medium of claim 71, wherein the fix score is computed as a function of an independence score, a need score, and a Horizontal Estimated Position Error (HEPE) associated with a MS position estimation corresponding to each fix information record, wherein the independence score is a measure of reliability of a transmitter providing the corresponding received fix information record, and the need score is measure indicating the relative desirability of retaining a fix information record.
80. The computer-readable medium of claim 71, wherein the wireless transmitter signals comprise one or more of femtocell, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Bluetooth, Satellite Positioning System (SPS), and cellular transmitter signals.
Type: Application
Filed: Feb 4, 2014
Publication Date: Aug 21, 2014
Applicant: QUALCOMM Incorporated (San Diego, CA)
Inventors: Marc Anthony Ische (San Diego, CA), Dominic Gerard Farmer (Los Gatos, CA), Mark Leo Moeglein (Ashland, OR), Zoltan F. Biacs (San Mateo, CA), Jignesh Umesh Doshi (San Diego, CA)
Application Number: 14/172,612
International Classification: G01S 5/00 (20060101); G01S 5/02 (20060101);
