METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR MONITORING HEALTH, FITNESS, OPERATION, OR PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUALS
Provided herein are systems, methods and computer readable media for monitoring the health and fitness of an individual. An example method comprises correlating a tag and a sensor to the individual, receiving tag derived data indicative of a location for the individual, and receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual. The method further comprises comparing the tag location data of the tag derived data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models. A HFOP status is then determined for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
Latest ZIH Corp. Patents:
- Rejected media unit storage for media processing devices
- Healthcare beacon device configuration systems and methods
- Media processing device with enhanced media and ribbon loading and unloading features
- Media load damper guide for printers
- Auxiliary media unit transporter for media processing devices
This application claims priority from and the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/831,990 filed Jun. 6, 2013, the contents of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
FIELDEmbodiments of the invention relate, generally, to monitoring the health, fitness, operation, and performance of individuals using a radio frequency (“RF”) location system.
BACKGROUNDIndividuals (e.g., persons, patients, athletes, animals, machines, etc.) may encounter circumstances whereby their health, fitness, operation, or performance becomes limited or compromised. Applicant has discovered problems associated with current methods and systems for monitoring the health, fitness, operation, or performance of individuals. Through applied effort, ingenuity, and innovation, Applicant has solved the identified problems by developing a solution that is embodied by the present invention, which is described in detail below.
BRIEF SUMMARYIn general, embodiments of the present invention provided herein include systems, methods and computer readable media for monitoring and determining status information concerning the health, fitness, operation, and performance of individuals using a RF location system.
In one embodiment, a method for monitoring an individual is provided. The method comprising receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models, comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the method may further comprise determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert. In one embodiment, the blink data is generated by one or more tags comprising an ultra-wideband (UWB) transmitter. In one embodiment, the UWB transmitter is configured to transmit a plurality of time of arrival (TOA) timing pulses. In one embodiment, the UWB transmitter is configured to transmit a tag data packet comprising 112 bits.
In one embodiment, the tag derived data further comprises a tag UID and a tag-individual correlator. In one embodiment, the tag derived data further comprises tag data, a tag UID, a tag-sensor correlator, and a sensor information packet. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID and additional stored sensor data. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID, additional stored sensor data, a sensor-individual correlator, and environmental measurements.
In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises position information read from a proximity label. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises associated sensor data generated by a sensor receiver upon receiving sensor information packets from first and second sensors. In one embodiment, at least part of the sensor derived data was transmitted from a location tag as part of a tag data packet.
In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one of an accelerometer, a diagnostic device, a triangulation positioner, or a proximity positioner. In one embodiment, the individual is a human being and the sensor derived data is generated from one or more sensors comprising at least one of a blood pressure sensor, a heart rate sensor, a body temperature sensor, an eye dilation sensor, a hydration sensor, a blood chemistry sensor, an ambient temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, or a barometric pressure sensor.
In one embodiment, individual is an animal and the sensor derived data is generated from one or more sensors comprising at least one of a blood pressure sensor, a heart rate sensor, a body temperature sensor, an eye dilation sensor, a hydration sensor, a blood chemistry sensor, an ambient temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, or a barometric pressure sensor. In one embodiment, the individual is a machine and the sensor derived data is generated from one or more sensor comprising at least one a throttle position sensor, brake position sensor, steering position sensor, axle, wheel or drive shaft sensor, rotary position sensor, crankshaft position sensor, engine coolant temperature sensor, water temperature sensor, oil temperature sensor, fuel gauge sensor, oil gauge sensor, suspension travel sensor, accelerometer, or pressure sensor.
In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual. In one embodiment, the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data. In one embodiment, the method may further comprise comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and determining whether the sensor-derived data satisfies the pre-defined thresholds.
In one embodiment, the individual is a human being and the tag location data is indicative of a position of at least one of a head, shoulder, a torso, an elbow, a hand, a hip, a knee, and a foot. In one embodiment, the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual. In one embodiment, the tag location data is indicative of foot position of each of two feet for the individual, and wherein the method further comprises determining a gait based on the tag location data. In one embodiment, the individual is a human being and the tag location data is indicative of a position of one or more of each of two hands, each of two feet, each of two knees, each of two hips, each of two elbows, and each of two shoulders. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a representation of sound made by the individual. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on identity information.
In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on zone data. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on role data. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on identity information and role data.
In another embodiment, a computer program product for monitoring an individual may be provided. The computer program product may comprise at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is generated based at least in part based on the blink data, receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models, comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code portions further comprise program code instructions for determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert. In one embodiment, the tag derived data is generated by a receiver configured to receive tag signals generated by an ultra-wideband (UWB) transmitter. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one of an accelerometer, a diagnostic device, a triangulation positioner, or a proximity positioner. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one of a blood pressure sensor, a heart rate sensor, a body temperature sensor, an eye dilation sensor, a hydration sensor, a blood chemistry sensor, an ambient temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, or a barometric pressure sensor.
In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one a throttle position sensor, brake position sensor, steering position sensor, axle, wheel or drive shaft sensor, rotary position sensor, crankshaft position sensor, engine coolant temperature sensor, water temperature sensor, oil temperature sensor, fuel gauge sensor, oil gauge sensor, suspension travel sensor, accelerometer, or pressure sensor. In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual. In one embodiment, the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data.
In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code portions further comprise program code instructions for comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generating an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold. In one embodiment, the tag location data comprises location data for each of two or more tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual. In one embodiment, the tag-derived data is indicative of a human being and the tag location data is indicative of a position of one or more of each of two hands, each of two feet, each of two knees, each of two hips, each of two elbows, and each of two shoulders.
In another embodiment, an apparatus may be provided comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for an individual, compare the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models, compare the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models, and determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the received tag derived data further comprises a tag UID and a tag-individual correlator. In one embodiment, the received tag derived data further comprises tag data, a tag UID, a tag-sensor correlator, and a sensor information packet. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID and additional stored sensor data. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID, additional stored sensor data, a sensor-individual correlator, and environmental measurements.
In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises position information read from a proximity label. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation generated by a smartphone comprising a triangulation positioner. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a position generated by a smartphone comprising a barcode imager. In one embodiment, the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, and wherein the sensor-derived data is determined, at least in part, based on DGPS correction data.
In one embodiment a method for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual is provided, the method comprising receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
In one embodiment, the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data. In one embodiment, the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator. In one embodiment, the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual. In one embodiment the method may further comprise determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared may be associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated the individual. In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
In another embodiment a method for assessing the health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual is provided, the method comprising receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, comparing the sensor derived data to a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model, and determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the method may further comprise receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, and comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models, wherein the determination of the HFOP status for the individual is further based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models. In one embodiment, the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data. In one embodiment the method may further comprise comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generating an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold. In one embodiment, the one or more health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models with which the sensor derived data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual, an individual identity associated the individual, or zone data associated with the individual.
In another embodiment a computer program product for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual is provided, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
In one embodiment, the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data. In one embodiment, the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator. In one embodiment, the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual. In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value, and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least role information associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
In another embodiment a computer program product for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual is provided, the computer program product may comprise at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, and performance level models, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data. In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code portions further comprise program code instructions for comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generating an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold. In one embodiment, the one or more health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual, an individual identity associated the individual, or zone data associated with the individual.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual is provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, compare the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models, and determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
In one embodiment, the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data. In one embodiment, the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator. In one embodiment, the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual. In one embodiment, the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to determine whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least role information associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual. In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
In another embodiment an apparatus for assessing the health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual is provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, compare the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models and performance level models, and determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data. In one embodiment, the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to compare the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generate an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold. In one embodiment, the one or more health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models with which the sensor derived data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual, an individual identity associated the individual, or zone data associated with the individual.
In one embodiment a method for monitoring an individual associated with a radio frequency (RF) location tag is provided, the method may comprise receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, receiving a tag-individual correlator associated with the individual, receiving a tag-sensor correlator associated with the RF location tag, and matching the tag-sensor correlator with the tag-individual correlator to associate the sensor-derived data with the individual. In one embodiment, the tag-individual correlator is received from an individual database. In one embodiment, the tag-individual correlator is determined from the blink data. In one embodiment, the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the blink data.
In another embodiment a method for associating an environmental measurement with an individual is provided, the method comprising associating an individual location with the individual, receiving, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, associating a sensor location with the sensor, and determining a sensor-individual correlator based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the individual, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the blink data. In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising a position calculation, the position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position calculation.
In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising position information, the position information accessed from a proximity label, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position information. In one embodiment, associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the sensor, and determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based at least in part on the blink data.
In one embodiment, associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) reference tag associated with the sensor, wherein said blink data includes a tag unique identification number, determining a location of the RF reference tag from a Geographical Information System based at least, in part, on the tag unique identification number, and determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based on the location of the RF reference tag. In another embodiment the method may further comprise receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
In one embodiment, the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position calculation. In one embodiment, the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises position information read from a proximity label, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position information. In one embodiment a method may further comprise receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based on the DGPS correction signal. In another embodiment the method may further comprise receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
In another embodiment a method for associating an environmental measurement with an individual is provided, the method comprising associating an individual location with the individual, receiving, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, associating a sensor location with the sensor, and associating the sensor with the individual based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location. In another embodiment the method may further comprise associating a sensor information packet, derived from the sensor signal, with the individual.
In another embodiment a computer program product for monitoring an individual associated with a radio frequency (RF) location tag may be provided, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, receiving a tag-individual correlator associated with the individual, receiving a tag-sensor correlator associated with the RF location tag, and matching the tag-sensor correlator with the tag-individual correlator to associate the sensor-derived data with the individual. In one embodiment, the tag-individual correlator is received from an individual database. In one embodiment, the tag-individual correlator is determined from the blink data. In one embodiment, the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the blink data.
In another embodiment a computer program product for associating an environmental measurement with an individual may be provided, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for associating an individual location with the individual, receiving, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, associating a sensor location with the sensor, and determining a sensor-individual correlator based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the individual, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the blink data. In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising a position calculation, the position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position calculation.
In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising position information, the position information accessed from a proximity label, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position information.
In one embodiment, associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the sensor, and determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based at least in part on the blink data.
In one embodiment, associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) reference tag associated with the sensor, wherein said blink data includes a tag unique identification number, determining a location of the RF reference tag from a Geographical Information System based at least, in part, on the tag unique identification number, and determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based on the location of the RF reference tag. In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based on the DGPS correction signal. In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
In one embodiment, the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position calculation. In one embodiment, the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises position information read from a proximity label, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position information. In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
In another embodiment an apparatus for monitoring an individual associated with a radio frequency (RF) location tag may be provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, receive a tag-individual correlator associated with the individual, receive a tag-sensor correlator associated with the RF location tag, and match the tag-sensor correlator with the tag-individual correlator to associate the sensor-derived data with the individual. In one embodiment, the tag-individual correlator is received from an individual database. In one embodiment, the tag-individual correlator is determined from the blink data. In one embodiment, the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the blink data. In one embodiment, the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the sensor-derived data.
In another embodiment an apparatus for associating an environmental measurement with an individual may be provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to associate an individual location with the individual, receive, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, associate a sensor location with the sensor, and determine a sensor-individual correlator based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the individual, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the blink data. In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising a position calculation, the position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position calculation.
In one embodiment, associating the individual location with the individual comprises receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising position information, the position information accessed from a proximity label, and determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position information. In one embodiment, associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the sensor, and determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based at least in part on the blink data.
In one embodiment, associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) reference tag associated with the sensor, wherein said blink data includes a tag unique identification number, determining a location of the RF reference tag from a Geographical Information System based at least, in part, on the tag unique identification number, and determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based on the location of the RF reference tag.
In one embodiment, the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position calculation. In one embodiment, the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determine the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
In one embodiment, the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises position information read from a proximity label, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position information. In one embodiment, the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal, and determine the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
In another embodiment an apparatus for associating an environmental measurement with an individual may be provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to associate an individual location with the individual, receive, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, associate a sensor location with the sensor, and associate the sensor with an individual based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
In another embodiment an apparatus for associating an environmental measurement with an individual may be provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to associate an individual location with the individual, receive, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising a sensor information packet, associate a sensor location with the sensor, and associate the sensor information packet with the individual based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
In one embodiment a method for assessing a health or fitness of an individual is provided, the method comprising receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least an individual identity. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a zone determined from the tag location data. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based at least partially on adversarial data. In one embodiment, the tag derived data comprises first blink data received from a first location tag associated with a first individual and second blink data received from a second location tag associated with a second individual, and wherein the adversarial data is based at least partially on comparing the first blink data to the second blink data.
In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In another embodiment a method for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual in a monitored area may be provided, the method comprising receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least a zone associated with or determined from the tag location data, comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least an individual identity. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
In another embodiment a method for monitoring an individual is provided, the method comprising receiving tag derived data for each of two or more tags, the tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, determining, based on an individual role database, that the two or more tags are associated with individuals in an adversarial role, and determining adversarial data based on the tag location data. In another embodiment the method may further comprise selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data, comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual associated with the at least one tag based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In another embodiment the method may further comprise receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags, selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data, comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In another embodiment the method may further comprise selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data, comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags, selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data, comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models and based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In another embodiment a computer program product may be provided, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least an individual identity. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a zone determined from the tag location data. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based at least partially on adversarial data. In one embodiment, the tag derived data comprises first blink data received from a first location tag associated with a first individual and second blink data received from a second location tag associated with a second individual, and wherein the adversarial data is based at least partially on comparing the first blink data to the second blink data In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In another embodiment, a computer program product for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual in a monitored area may be provided, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data,
receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least a zone associated with or determined from the tag location data, comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least an individual identity. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
In one embodiment, a computer program product for monitoring an individual may be provided, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for receiving tag derived data for each of two or more tags, the tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, determining, based on an individual role database, that the two or more tags are associated with individuals in an adversarial role, determining adversarial data based on the tag location data.
In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data, comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, and determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual associated with the at least one tag based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model. In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags, selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data, comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data, comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags, selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data, comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models and based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In another embodiment an apparatus for assessing a health or fitness of an individual is provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, select an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database, compare the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, and determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least an individual identity. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a zone determined from the tag location data. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role. In one embodiment, selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role and an individual identity. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based at least partially on adversarial data. In one embodiment, the tag derived data comprises first blink data received from a first location tag associated with a first individual and second blink data received from a second location tag associated with a second individual, and wherein the adversarial data is based at least partially on comparing the first blink data to the second blink data.
In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range. In one embodiment, comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In one embodiment, an apparatus for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual in a monitored area may be provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual, select a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least a zone associated with or determined from the tag location data, compare the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determine a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least an individual identity. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role. In one embodiment, selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for monitoring an individual may be provided, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive tag derived data for each of two or more tags, the tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data, determine, based on an individual role database, that the two or more tags are associated with individuals in an adversarial role, and determine adversarial data based on the tag location data. In one embodiment, the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to select an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data, compare the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, and determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual associated with the at least one tag based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In one embodiment, the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags, select a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data, compare the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determine a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
In one embodiment, the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to select an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data, compare the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model, receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags, select a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data, compare the sensor derived data to the HFOP model, and determine a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models and based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
In some embodiments, a system may be provided. The system may comprise at least one of the above recited apparatuses. In some embodiments, the system may further comprise one or more tags. In some embodiments, the system may further comprise one or more sensors.
Having thus described embodiments of the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Embodiments of the present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the inventions are shown. Indeed, embodiments of the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
As used herein, the terms “data,” “content,” “information” and similar terms may be used interchangeably to refer to data capable of being captured, transmitted, received, displayed and/or stored in accordance with various example embodiments. Thus, use of any such terms should not be taken to limit the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Further, where a computing device is described herein to receive data from another computing device, it will be appreciated that the data may be received directly from the another computing device or may be received indirectly via one or more intermediary computing devices, such as, for example, one or more servers, relays, routers, network access points, base stations, and/or the like, sometimes referred to herein as a “network.” Similarly, where a computing device is described herein to send data to another computing device, it will be appreciated that the data may be sent directly to the another computing device or may be sent indirectly via one or more intermediary computing devices, such as, for example, one or more servers, relays, routers, network access points, base stations, and/or the like.
BRIEF OVERVIEWThe methods, apparatus and computer program products described herein are operable to monitor the health, fitness, operation, and performance of individuals. In some embodiments, the health, fitness, operation, and performance of individuals are monitored based on highly accurate location and/or position data associated with the monitored individuals. Such highly accurate location and/or position data may be further improved with the use of sensor data to provide real-time health, fitness, operation, and performance information concerning the monitored individuals.
The term “individual” as used herein refers to a person, patient, athlete, an animal, a machine (e.g., a race car), or other entity having health, fitness, operation, or performance levels that may be deemed appropriate for remote monitoring.
Health may generally refer to a condition (e.g., healthy, sick, injured, tired, stressed, dehydrated, dizzy) of an individual. Health may include, but is not limited to, identifying whether an individual is healthy and if not, which of one or more conditions the individual may be afflicted with (e.g., the flu). A health model may include, but is not limited to, particular sensor data and associated thresholds or ranges of health related parameters that may indicate one or more conditions.
Fitness may generally refer to whether an individual or object is capable or suitable for performing a function. Fitness may include, but is not limited to, an ability to perform a function. A fitness model may include, but is not limited to, particular sensor data and associated thresholds or ranges of fitness parameters that may indicate one or more functions. For example, if sensor data indicates a stride length of 20+ feet and/or a sustained heart rate of 220+ beats per minutes, an associated fitness model may indicate a horse is performing such feats, and may then look to functions horses may perform. Operation may generally relate to the practical application of a process. Operation may include, but is not limited to, identifying whether an individual is injured or not, and if so, with what injury an individual may be afflicted with (e.g., sprained ankle) and/or at what level may the individual operate at. An operation model may include, but is not limited to, particular sensor data and associated thresholds or ranges that may indicate one or more injuries and/or a percentage of optimal operation. As an example, an individual athlete may take a mental test which can be used as a baseline operation model. If the individual athlete then takes a similar mental test after a head injury and performance differs significantly from the first mental test, the individual may be diagnosed as being in a dizzy or disoriented condition and may predict that the injury cause of the condition is a concussion.
Performance may include, but is not limited to, the manner or quality of functioning or an indication of a performance level. In one embodiment, performance may be generally described as a vector of measurements as discussed in greater detail below. A performance model may include, but is not limited to, particular sensor data and associated thresholds or ranges that may indicate performance quality and/or one or more performance levels. In the concussion example, the mental test defines the measurements for the operation model. When the athlete takes the initial test, the measurements are recorded, establishing the baseline performance level. When the athlete takes the second test, the measurements are recorded, establishing a second performance level. Comparing the second performance level to the baseline performance level involves comparing at least some of the measurements from the second test to the corresponding measurements from the first test.
There are many reasons why one may wish to monitor the health, fitness, operation, and performance of individuals in real time or near-real time. For example, one may wish to make sure that if a person is hurt that someone else is alerted to provide aid, e.g., a parent, a trainer, a paramedic or other health care professional. In some cases, it may be obvious that a person is hurt (e.g., they fall down, cry, scream, or become unconscious). In other circumstances, their injuries may be less obvious (e.g., stimulus response times may be slowed, they may limp, or they may otherwise move or perform abnormally). In still other circumstances, health, fitness, operation, and performance degradations may only be determined using sensors making appropriate measurements (e.g., heart rate, breathing, body temperature, blood chemistry, etc.). In certain circumstances, multiple measurements may be needed to identify degradations.
With the advent of location tracking in sports, it is possible to use precise position information to facilitate monitoring of health and fitness of players, referees, bat boys, coaches, mascots, beer vendors, racing sausages, or even fans in new ways that are easier, faster, and can provide additional information. In this regard, dynamics/kinetics models may be utilized also. A dynamics/kinetics model may include, but is not limited to, position information and associated actions. For example, location data indicating a track shape may indicate an action of “running on a track” or the like. In another embodiment, actions may include or be indicative of non-actions, such as lying down or standing still. In another example, multi-dimensional position information that includes arm/hand position and leg/foot position could indicate that a person is running, lying on the ground, or positioned in a three-point football stance.
Various embodiments of the invention are directed to monitoring the health, fitness, operation, and performance of individuals using a RF location system that is configured to aggregate location information with other sensor data. In this regard, such embodiments are configurable to provide alerts, analytics, and statistics that may be used to diagnose, treat, and improve the health, fitness, operation, and performance of individuals.
Example RF Location System ArchitectureIn some examples, the system comprising at least the tags 102 and the receivers 106 is configured to provide two dimensional and/or three dimensional precision localization (e.g., subfoot resolutions), even in the presence of multipath interference, due in part to the use of short nanosecond duration pulses whose time-of-flight can be accurately determined using detection circuitry, such as in the receivers 106, which can trigger on the leading edge of a received waveform. In some examples, this short pulse characteristic allows necessary data to be conveyed by the system at a higher peak power, but lower overall power levels, than a wireless system configured for high data rate communications, yet still operate within local regulatory requirements which may limit overall power levels.
In some examples, the tags 102 may operate with an instantaneous −3 dB bandwidth of approximately 400 MHz and an average transmission rate below a 187.5 kHz regulatory cutoff. In such examples, the predicted maximum range of the system, operating at 6.0 GHz, is roughly 311 meters. Such a configuration advantageously satisfies constraints applied by regulatory bodies related to peak and average power densities (e.g., effective isotropic radiated power density), while still optimizing system performance related to range and interference. In further examples, tag transmissions with a −3 dB bandwidth of approximately 400 MHz yields, in some examples, an instantaneous pulsewidth of roughly 2.5 nanoseconds which enables a resolution to better than 30 centimeters.
Referring again to
In some examples, the RF location tag 102 may employ UWB waveforms (e.g., low data rate waveforms) to achieve extremely fine resolution because of their extremely short pulse (i.e., sub-nanosecond to nanosecond, such as a 2 ns (lns up and lns down)) durations. As such, the tag data packet may be of a short length (e.g., 72-112 bits in some example embodiments), that advantageously enables a higher throughput and higher transmission rates. In some examples, higher throughput and/or higher transmission rates may result in larger datasets for filtering to achieve a more accurate location estimate. In some examples, rates of up to approximately 2600 updates per second can be accommodated without exceeding regulatory requirements. Alternatively or additionally, in some examples, the length of the tag data packets, in conjunction with other system functionality, may also result in a longer battery life (e.g., a 3.0 v 1 A-hr lithium cell battery may result in a tag battery life in excess of 3.8 years).
In some examples, one or more other tags, such as a reference tag 104, may be positioned within and/or about a monitored area, such as monitored area 100 illustrated herein as a football field. In some examples, the reference tag 104 may be configured to transmit a signal that is used to measure the relative phase (e.g., the count of free-running counters) of non-resettable counters within the receivers 106.
One or more (preferably four or more) receivers 106 are also at locations with predetermined coordinates within and/or around the monitored area 100. In some examples, the receivers 106 may be connected in a “daisy chain” fashion to advantageously allow for a large number of receivers 106 to be interconnected over a significant monitored area in order to reduce and simplify cabling, reduce latency, provide power and/or the like. Each of the receivers 106 includes a receiver for receiving transmissions, such as UWB transmissions, and preferably, a packet decoding circuit that extracts a time of arrival (TOA) timing pulse train, transmitter ID, packet number and/or other information that may have been encoded in the tag transmission signal (e.g., material description, personal information, etc.) and is configured to sense signals transmitted by the tags 102 and one or more reference tags 104 (if present).
Each receiver 106 includes a time measuring circuit that measures time differences of arrival (TDOA) of tag bursts. The time measuring circuit is phase-locked (e.g., phase differences do not change and therefore respective frequencies are identical) with a common digital reference clock signal distributed via cable connection from a receiver hub 108 having a central timing reference clock generator. The reference clock signal establishes a common timing reference for the receivers 106. Thus, multiple time measuring circuits of the respective receivers 106 are synchronized in frequency, but not necessarily in phase. While there typically may be a phase offset between any given pair of receivers in the receivers 106, the offset is readily determined through use of a reference tag 104. Alternatively or additionally, each receiver may be synchronized wirelessly via virtual synchronization without a dedicated physical timing channel.
In some example embodiments, the receivers 106 are configured to determine various attributes of the received signal. Since measurements are determined at each receiver 106, in a digital format, rather than analog, signals are transmittable to the receiver hub 108. Advantageously, because packet data and measurement results can be transferred at high speeds to a receiver memory, the receivers 106 can receive and process tag (and corresponding object) locating signals on a nearly continuous basis. As such, in some examples, the receiver memory allows for a high burst rate of tag events (i.e., tag data packets) to be captured.
Data cables or wireless transmissions may convey measurement data from the receivers 106 to the receiver hub 108 (e.g., the data cables may enable a transfer speed of 2 Mbps). In some examples, measurement data is transferred to the receiver hub at regular polling intervals.
As such, the receiver hub 108 determines or computes tag location (i.e., object location) by processing TDOA measurements related to multiple data packets detected by the receivers 106. In some example embodiments, the receiver hub 108 may be configured to resolve the coordinates of a tag using nonlinear optimization techniques. The receiver hub 108 may also be referred to herein as a locate engine or a receiver hub/locate engine.
In some examples, the system described herein may be referred to as an “over-specified” or “over-determined” system. As such, the receiver hub 108 may then calculate one or more valid (i.e., most likely) locations based on a set of measurements and/or one or more incorrect (i.e., less likely) locations. For example, a location may be calculated that is impossible due the laws of physics (e.g., a tag on a football player that travels more than 100 yards in 1 second) or may be an outlier when compared to other determined locations. As such one or more algorithms or heuristics may be applied to minimize such error.
One such algorithm for error minimization, which may be referred to as a time error minimization algorithm, may be described as
where N is the number of receivers, c is the speed of light, xj,k, yj,k and zj,k are the coordinates of the receivers and tj,k are the arrival times received at each of the receivers. Note that only time differences may be received at receiver 106 in some example embodiments. The starting point for the minimization is obtained by first doing an area search on a coarse grid of x, y and z over an area defined by the user. This is followed by a localized steepest descent search.
Another or second algorithm for error minimization, which may be referred to as a distance error minimization algorithm, may be defined by:
where time and location differences are replaced by their non-differential values by incorporating an additional unknown dummy variable, t0, which represents an absolute time epoch. The starting point for this algorithm is fixed at the geometric mean location of all active receivers. No initial area search is needed, and optimization proceeds through the use of a Davidon-Fletcher-Powell (DFP) quasi-Newton algorithm in some examples.
In order to determine the coordinates of a tag (T), in some examples and for calibration purposes, a reference tag (e.g., reference tag 104) is positioned at a known coordinate position (xT, yT, zT).
In further example embodiments, a number N of receivers {Rj: j=1, . . . , N} (e.g., receivers 106) are positioned at known coordinates (xR
dRj=√(xR
from a reference tag.
Each receiver Rj utilizes, for example, a synchronous clock signal derived from a common frequency time base, such as clock generator. Because the receivers are not synchronously reset, an unknown, but constant offset Oj exits for each receiver's internal free running counter. The value of the offset Oj is measured in terms of the number of fine resolution count increments (e.g., a number of nanoseconds for a one nanosecond resolution system).
The reference tag is used to calibrate the radio frequency locating system as follows:
The reference tag emits a signal burst at an unknown time τR. Upon receiving the signal burst from the reference tag, a count NR
NR
where c is the speed of light and fi is the number of fine resolution count increments per unit time (e.g., one per nanosecond). Similarly, each object tag Ti of each object to be located transmits a signal at an unknown time τi to produce a count
Ni
at receiver Rj where di
Δjk is constant as long as dRj−dRk remains constant, (which means the receivers and tag are fixed and there is no multipath situation) and β is the same for each receiver. Note that Δj
Ni
Or,
di
The process further includes determining a minimum error value Ei, for each object tag Ti, according to the functional relationship:
is the Euclidean distance between point (x,y,z) and the coordinates of the jth receiver Rj. The minimization solution (x′,y′,z′) is the estimated coordinate position for the ith tag at t0.
In an example algorithm, this proceeds according to:
where each arrival time, tj, is referenced to a particular receiver (receiver “1”) as follows:
and the minimization is performed over variables (x, y, z, t0) to reach a solution (x′, y′, z′, t0′).
In some example embodiments, the location of a tag 102 (e.g., tag location data) may then be output to the receiver processing and analytics system 110 for further processing to advantageously provide visualizations, predictive analytics and/or the like.
Individuals Equipped with Location Tags and SensorsThe depicted individual 200 is equipped with a plurality of tags 202a-j (e.g., the RF location tags 102 discussed in connection with
As discussed above, each tag may be a device configured for transmitting a signal, for example, a UWB signal that includes a TOA timing pulse, and optionally, a tag data packet that may include, but is not limited to, ID information (e.g., tag UID), a sequential burst count or other desired information. The tag signals (e.g., blink data) may be collected and used, e.g., by the receiver hub 108 of
While
The individual 200 depicted in
The depicted individual 250 is further equipped with a power supply 255 positioned on a belt proximate to the individual's waist. The depicted power supply may be disposed in electrical communication (perhaps through wires sewn into clothing, etc.) with the tag and/or sensors 253a-e to provide primary or back-up power to such devices. In other embodiments (such as that shown in
While
In various embodiments (including those shown in
In still other embodiments, one or more sensors may be disposed in wired or wireless communication with one or more tags and, thus, may leverage the transmitters of the one or more tags to package and relay the sensor information packet to one or more remote receivers. In an embodiment where a tag transmits the sensor information packet to one or more remote receivers, the tag may incorporate the sensor information packet into the tag-data packet, such that the transmitted tag-data packet may include both the sensor information packet and tag data elements. In some embodiments, the transmitted tag-data packet may include a tag-sensor correlator that can be used to associate a specific sensor with a specific tag.
As may be appreciated by one skilled in the art in view of this disclosure, the one or more sensors may be configured specifically for attachment to an individual as a worn sensor. For example, one or more sensors may be sewn or woven into fabric. For a participant in a sporting event, that fabric could be part of a uniform or referee outfit. For an individual in a sausage race, the sensor could be attached to the lederhosen or sombrero portion of the sausage costume. For a fan, the sensor might be worn as a wristband or nametag. In another embodiment, one or more sensors may be inserted under a layer of skin or swallowed. In another example embodiment, one or more sensors may be part of a computing application or large medical diagnostic device that the individual patient sits by or lays next to in order to provide physical data.
The one or more sensors may be powered wirelessly by an RF interrogator or may be powered by a dedicated battery or capacitor mounted within or proximate to the sensor itself. In another embodiment, power may be provided by wire or wirelessly by a location tag, a separate power source worn on the athlete's body, or by environmental activity, such as solar power, kinetic energy, shock, or motion. In another embodiment, power may be provided from a wall outlet. In an embodiment in which power is not internal to the sensor or provided wirelessly, power may be carried to the sensor over the skin, via a cable, or via a woven fabric.
As will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of this disclosure, once the tags and sensors of
The depicted RF location tag 102 may generate or store a tag UID and/or tag data as shown. The tag data may include useful information such as the installed firmware version, last tag maintenance date, configuration information, and/or a tag-individual correlator. The tag-individual correlator may comprise data that indicates that a monitored individual is associated with the RF location tag 102 (e.g., name, uniform number and team, biometric data, tag position on individual, i.e., right wrist). As will be apparent to one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, the tag-individual correlator may be stored to the RF location tag 102 when the tag is registered or otherwise associated with an individual. While shown as a separate field for illustration purposes, one of ordinary skill in the art may readily appreciate that the tag-individual correlator may be part of any tag data or even omitted from the tag.
The tag signal data transmitted from RF location tag 102 to receiver 106 may include “blink data” as it is transmitted at selected intervals. This “blink rate” may be set by the tag designer or the system designer to meet application requirements. In some embodiments, the blink rate is consistent for one or all tags and, in other embodiments, the blink rate may data dependent (i.e., change based on the data transmitted). Blink data includes characteristics of the tag signal that allow the tag signal to be recognized by the receiver 106 so the location of the RF location tag 102 may be determined by the locating system. Blink data may also comprise one or more tag data packets. Such tag data packets may include any data from the tag 102 that is intended for transmission such as, for example in the depicted embodiment, a tag UID, tag data, and a tag-individual correlator. In the case of TDOA systems, the blink data may be or include a specific pattern, code, or trigger that the receiver 106 (or downstream receiver processing and analytics system) detects to identify that the transmission is from a RF location tag 102 (e.g., a UWB tag).
The depicted receiver 106 receives the tag signal, which includes blink data and tag data packets as discussed above. In one embodiment, the receiver 106 may pass the received tag signal directly to the receive hub/locate engine 108 as part of its receiver signal. In another embodiment, the receiver 106 could perform some basic processing on the received tag signal. For instance, the receiver could extract blink data from the tag signal and transmit the blink data to the receive hub/locate engine 108. The receiver could transmit a time measurement to the receive hub/locate engine 108 such as a TOA measurement and/or a TDOA measurement. The time measurement could be based on a clock time generated or calculated in the receiver, it could be based on a receiver offset value as explained at least in paragraph [00135] above, it could be based on a system time, and/or it could be based on the time difference of arrival between the tag signal of the RF location tag 102 and the tag signal of a RF reference tag (e.g., tag 104 of
The depicted RF location tag 202 may comprise a tag UID and tag data (such as a tag-individual correlator) and transmit a tag signal comprising blink data as discussed in connection with
The sensor-individual correlator may comprise data that indicates that a monitored individual is associated with the sensor 203 (e.g., name, uniform number and team, biometric data, sensor position on individual, i.e., right wrist). As will be apparent to one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, the sensor-individual correlator may be stored to the sensor 203 when the sensor is registered or otherwise associated with an individual. While shown as a separate field for illustration purposes, one of ordinary skill in the art may readily appreciate that the sensor-individual correlator may be part of any additional stored sensor data or omitted from the sensor altogether.
Sensors such as sensor 203 that are structured according to embodiments of the invention may sense or determine one or more environmental conditions (e.g. temperature, pressure, pulse, heartbeat, rotation, velocity, acceleration, radiation, position, chemical concentration, voltage) and store or transmit “environmental measurements” that are indicative of such conditions. To clarify, the term “environmental measurements” includes measurements concerning the environment proximate the sensor including, without limitation, ambient information (e.g., temperature, position,humidity, etc.) and information concerning an individual's health, fitness, operation, and/or performance. Environmental measurements may be stored or transmitted in either analog or digital form and may be transmitted as individual measurements, as a set of individual measurements, and/or as summary statistics. For example, temperature in degrees Celsius may be transmitted as {31}, or as {33, 32, 27, 22, 20, 23, 27, 30, 34, 31}, or as {27.9}. In some embodiments, the sensor-individual correlator could be determined at least in part from the environmental measurements.
In the depicted embodiment, RF location tag 202 transmits a tag signal to receiver 106 and sensor 203 transmits a sensor signal to sensor receiver 166. The sensor signal may comprise one or more sensor information packets. Such sensor information packets may include any data or information from the sensor 203 that is intended for transmission such as, for example in the depicted embodiment, sensor UID, additional stored sensor data, sensor-individual correlator, and environmental measurements. A receiver signal from receiver 106 and a sensor receiver signal from sensor receiver 166 may be transmitted via wired or wireless communication to receiver hub/locate engine 108 as shown.
In one embodiment, the RF location tag 202, the sensor 203, or both, may generate and/or store a tag-sensor correlator that indicates an association between a RF location tag 202 and a sensor 203 (e.g., tag UID/sensor UID, distance from tag to sensor in a particular stance, set of sensors associated with a set of tags, sensor types associated with a tag, etc.). In the depicted embodiment, both the RF location tag 202 and the sensor 203 store the tag-sensor correlator.
In the depicted embodiment, sensor 203 transmits a sensor signal to RF location tag 202. The sensor signal may comprise one or more sensor information packets as discussed above. The sensor information packets may comprise the sensor UID, a sensor-individual correlator, additional stored sensor data, the tag-sensor correlator, and/or the environmental measurements. The RF location tag 202 may store some portion or some or all of the sensor information packets locally and may package the sensor information packets into one or more tag data packets for transmission to receiver 106 as part of a tag signal or simply pass them along as part of its tag signal.
The depicted sensor 203 transmits a sensor signal to RF reference tag 104. The RF reference tag 104 may store some portion or some or all of the sensor information packets locally and may package the sensor information packets into one or more tag data packets for transmission to receiver 106 as part of a tag signal, or simply pass them along as part of its tag signal.
As was described above in connection with
In the depicted embodiment, receiver 106 is configured to receive a tag signal from RF location tag 202 and a sensor signal directly from sensor 203. In such embodiments, sensor 203 may be configured to communicate in a communication protocol that is common to RF location tag 202 as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of this disclosure.
In some embodiments, the proximity interrogator 223 is operative as a proximity communication device that can trigger a RF location tag 202 (e.g., when the RF location tag 202 detects the field produced by the proximity interrogator 223) to transmit blink data under an alternate blink pattern or blink rate. The RF location tag can initiate a preprogrammed (and typically faster) blink rate to allow more location points for tracking an individual. In some embodiments, the RF location tag may not transmit a tag signal until triggered by the proximity interrogator 223. In some embodiments the RF location tag 202 may be triggered when the RF location tag 202 moves near (e.g., within communication proximity to) a proximity interrogator 223. In some embodiments, the RF location tag may be triggered when the proximity interrogator 223 moves near to the RF location tag 202. In other embodiments, the RF location tag 202 may be triggered when a button is pressed or a switch is activated on the proximity interrogator 223 or on the RF location tag itself. For example, a proximity interrogator 223 could be placed at the start line of a racetrack. Every time a car passes the start line, a car-mounted RF location tag 202 senses the signal from the proximity interrogator and is triggered to transmit a tag signal indicating that a lap has been completed. As another example, a proximity interrogator 223 could be placed at a Gatorade cooler. Each time an athlete fills a cup from the cooler an athlete-mounted RF location tag 202 senses the signal from the proximity interrogator and is triggered to transmit a tag signal indicating that Gatorade has been consumed. As another example, a proximity interrogator 223 could be placed on a medical cart. When paramedics use the medical cart to pick up an athlete and move her to the locker room, an athlete-mounted RF location tag 202 senses the signal from the proximity interrogator and is triggered to transmit a tag signal indicating that they have been removed from the game. As explained, any of these post-triggered tag signals may differ from pre-triggered tag signals in terms of any aspect of the analog and/or digital attributes of the transmitted tag signal.
While the depicted diagnostic device 233 is not worn by an individual, it may generate and store a sensor-individual correlator for association with environmental measurements taken in connection with a specific individual. For example, in one embodiment, the diagnostic device 233 may be a blood pressure meter that is configured to store as environmental measurements blood pressure data for various individuals. Each set of environmental measurements (e.g., blood pressure data) may be stored and associated with a sensor-individual correlator.
The depicted diagnostic device 233 is configured to transmit a sensor signal comprising sensor information packets to a sensor receiver 166. The sensor information packets may comprise one or more of the sensor UID, the additional stored data, the environmental measurements, and/or the sensor-individual correlator as discussed above. The sensor receiver 166 may associate some or all of the data from the sensor information packets with other stored data in the sensor receiver 166 or with data stored or received from other sensors, diagnostic devices, RF location tags 102, or reference tags. The sensor receiver 166 transmits a sensor receiver signal to a receiver hub/locate engine 108.
Another type of sensor shown in
In some embodiments, a triangulation positioner (also known as a global positioning system (GPS) receiver) receives clock data transmitted by one or more geostationary satellites (a satellite in a known or knowable position) and/or one or more ground based transmitters (also in known or knowable positions), compares the received clock data, and computes a “position calculation”. The position calculation may be included in one or more sensor information packets as environmental measurements.
In another embodiment, a triangulation positioner comprises one or more cameras or image-analyzers that receive emitted or reflected light or heat, and then analyzes the received images to determine the location of an individual or sensor. Although a triangulation positioner may transmit data wirelessly, it is not a RF location tag because it does not transmit blink data or a tag signal that can be used by a receiver hub/locate engine 108 to calculate location. In contrast, a triangulation positioner senses position and computes a position calculation that may then be used as environmental measurements by the receiver hub/locate engine 108.
In one embodiment, a triangulation positioner could be combined with a RF location tag or reference tag (not shown). In such embodiments, the triangulation positioner could compute and transmit its position calculation via the RF location tag to one or more receivers. However, the receiver hub/locate engine would calculate tag location based on the blink data received as part of the tag signal and not based solely on the position calculation. The position calculation would be considered as environmental measurements and may be included in associated sensor information packets.
As will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, position calculations (e.g., GPS receiver position calculations) are not as accurate as the location calculations (e.g., UWB waveform based location calculations) performed by receiver hub/locate engines structured in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. That is not to say that position calculations may not be improved using known techniques. For example, a number of influences, including atmospheric conditions, can cause GPS accuracy to vary over time. One way to control this is to use a differential global positioning system (DGPS) comprising one or a network of stationary triangulation positioners that are placed in a known position, and the coordinates of the known position are stored in memory as additional stored sensor data. These triangulation positioners receive clock data from geostationary satellites, determine a position calculation, and broadcast a difference between the position calculation and the stored coordinates. This DGPS correction signal can be used to correct for these influences and significantly reduce location estimate error. Exemplary use of DGPS correction may be found in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,755,541, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Another type of sensor shown in
In some embodiments, a proximity detector senses an attribute of an individual (or an individual's wristband, tag, label, card, badge, clothing, uniform, costume, phone, ticket, etc.). The identity sensed by a proximity detector may be stored locally at the proximity detector 253 as shown and transmitted as environmental measurements via one or more sensor information packets to a sensor receiver 166.
In some embodiments, a proximity detector 253 may have a defined position, which is often stationary, and may be associated with a location in the monitored area 100 of
In one embodiment, the proximity detector could be associated with a reference tag (e.g., tag 104 of
In the embodiment where the proximity detector includes a RF location tag, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 would locate the associated RF location tag, and the tag data/sensor data filter 112 would associate the tag location data for the associated RF location tag as the position of the proximity detector, while determining the identity of an associated individual from any received sensor information packets. In the alternate embodiment where the proximity detector includes a triangulation positioner, the triangulation positioner would compute a position calculation that could be stored as additional stored sensor data and/or environmental measurements, and transmitted as one or more sensor information packets. In one embodiment, sensor information packets for a proximity detector may include both sensed identity information and a position calculation.
Another type of sensor shown in
A proximity label 263 may be a sticker, card, tag, passive RFID tag, active RFID tag, NFC tag, ticket, metal plate, electronic display, electronic paper, inked surface, sundial, or otherwise visible or machine readable identification device as is known in the art. The coordinates of the position of the proximity label 263 are stored such that they are accessible to the receive hub/locate engine 108. For example, in one embodiment, the position coordinates of a proximity label 263 could be stored in a field database or monitored area database accessible via a network, or stored locally as additional stored data in the proximity detector 253.
In some embodiments, a position of the proximity label 263 is encoded into the proximity label 263 itself. For example, coordinates of a position of the proximity label 263 could be encoded into a passive RFID tag that is placed in that position. As another example, the coordinates of a position of the proximity label 263 could be encoded into a printed barcode that is placed in that position. As another example, a proximity label 263 comprising a NFC tag could be encoded with the location “end zone”, and the NFC tag could be placed at or near an end zone at Bank of America stadium. In some embodiments, the stored coordinates of the proximity label 263 may be offset from the actual coordinates of the proximity label 263 by a known or determinable amount.
In one embodiment, a proximity label 263 such as an NFC tag may be encoded with a position. When a sensor such as a proximity detector approaches the NFC tag it may read the position, then transmit the position in a sensor information packet to the sensor receiver 166′ and eventually to the receiver hub/locate engine 108. In another embodiment, a proximity label 263 such as a barcode label may be encoded with an identification code. When a smartphone with a proximity detector (such as a barcode imager) and a triangulation positioner (such as a GPS chip, GPS application, or similar device) approaches the barcode label it may read the identification code from the barcode, determine a position calculation from received clock data, then transmit the identity and the position calculation to sensor receiver 166′ and eventually to the receiver hub/locate engine 108 as part of one or more sensor information packets.
In the depicted embodiment, triangulation positioner 243 and proximity detector 253 are each configured to transmit sensor signals carrying sensor information packets to sensor receiver 166′. The depicted sensors 243, 253, like any sensor discussed herein, may transmit sensor signals via wired or wireless communication protocols. For example, any proprietary or standard wireless protocol (e.g., 802.11, Zigbee, ISO/IEC 802.15.4, ISO/IEC 18000, IrDA, Bluetooth, CDMA, or any other protocol) could be used for the sensor signals. Alternatively or additionally, any standard or proprietary wired communication protocol (e.g., Ethernet, Parallel, Serial, RS-232, RS-422, USB, Firewire, I2C, etc.) may be used. Similarly, sensor receiver 166′, and any receiver discussed herein, may use similar wired and wireless protocols to transmit receiver signals to the receiver hub/locate engine.
In one embodiment, upon receiving sensor signals from the triangulation positioner 243 and the proximity detector 253, the sensor receiver 166′ may associate some or all of the data from the received sensor information packets with other data stored to the sensor receiver 166′, or with data stored or received from other sensors (e.g., sensor 203), diagnostic devices 233, RF location tags 102, or RF reference tags 104. Such associated data is referred to herein as “associated sensor data”. In the depicted embodiment, the sensor receiver 166′ is configured to transmit some or all of the received sensor information packets and any associated sensor data to the receiver hub/locate engine 108 at part of a sensor receiver signal.
In one embodiment, a smartphone comprising a proximity detector (such as a barcode imager) and a triangulation positioner (such as a GPS chip) may associate an identification code determined from a barcode with a position calculation from received clock data as associated sensor data and transmit a sensor information packet that includes such associated sensor data to the receiver hub/locate engine 108. In another embodiment, the smartphone could transmit a first sensor information packet including the identification code and the smartphone's unique identifier to another sensor receiver, the smartphone could transmit a second sensor information packet including the position calculation and the smartphone's unique identifier to the sensor receiver, and the sensor receiver could associate the position calculation with the identification code based on the common smartphone unique identifier and transmit such associated sensor data to the receiver hub/locate engine 108. In another embodiment, the sensor receiver could determine a first time measurement associated with the first sensor information packet and a second time measurement associated with the second sensor information packet that, in conjunction with the sensor UID, could be used, by the receiver hub/locate engine 108, to associate the first sensor information packet with the second sensor information packet.
In one embodiment, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 receives receiver signals from the receiver 106 and sensor receiver signals from the sensor receivers 166, 166′. In the depicted embodiment, receiver 106 may receive blink data from the RF location tag 102 and transmits to the receiver hub/locate engine 108 some or all of the blink data, perhaps with additional time measurements or signal measurements. In some embodiments, time measurements or signal measurements may be based on a tag signal received from a RF reference tag (e.g., reference tag 104 of
The receiver hub/locate engine 108 may also access stored data or clock data from local storage and from a network location. The receiver hub/locate engine 108 uses this information to determine tag location data for each RF location tag. It may also associate data derived or extracted from tag signals transmitted from one or more RF location tags with information or data derived or extracted from sensor signals transmitted from one or more sensors.
In addition to the TOA or TDOA systems previously described, other real-time location systems (RTLS) such as received signal strength indication based systems could potentially be implemented by a receiver hub/locate engine 108. Any RTLS system using RF location tags, including those described herein, could require considerable processing by the receiver hub/locate engine 108 to determine the tag location data from the blink data received from the tags. These may require time measurement and/or signal measurement in addition to blink data, which preferably includes a tag UID. In contrast, in other systems, such as global position systems (GPS) systems, location data is determined based upon the position calculation transmitted from a GPS transmitter (also referred to as a GPS receiver or GPS tag) which includes calculated information about the location where the tag was positioned (i.e., coordinates determined at the tag via satellite signal triangulation, etc.) when the position calculation was determined or stored. Thus, GPS information typically refers to additional information that is transmitted along with a GPS transmitter ID before the transmission is received by a sensor receiver.
A GPS host device or back-end server may receive the GPS information and simply parse the position calculation (as opposed to calculating the position information at the host device) and the GPS transmitter ID into a data record. This data record may be used as a GPS position calculation, or it could be converted to a different coordinate system to be used as a GPS position calculation, or it could be processed further with DGPS information to be used as a GPS position calculation.
Returning to
In one embodiment, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may parse sensor information packets from received tag data packets and associate such sensor information packets with the RF location tag 202 that transmitted the sensor information packet. Thus, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may be able to determine tag location data, which may comprise a location and other data (e.g., tag data, tag UID, tag-individual correlator, sensor-individual correlator, additional stored sensor data, environmental measurements, tag-sensor correlator, identity information, position calculation, etc.) from one or more tags or sensors. Such data and information may be transmitted to the receiver processing and analytics system 110.
In some embodiments, once the receiver hub/locate engine 108 determines a location estimate of a RF location tag 102 at the time epoch of the tag signal, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 can also associate a location estimate with the tag data packet included in the blink data of such tag signal. In some embodiments, the location estimate of the tag signal may be used as tag location data for the tag data packet. In some embodiments a Geographical Information System (GIS) may be used by the receive hub/locate engine 108 to refine a location estimate, or to map a location estimate in one coordinate system to a location estimate in a different coordinate system, to provide a location estimate for the tag data packet. In some embodiments the Geographical Information System may include a known location for one or more RF reference tags identifiable by a tag unique identification number.
In one embodiment, the location estimated for the tag data packet may be associated with any data in the tag data packet, including a tag UID, other tag data, and, if included, one or more sensor information packets, including sensor UID, additional stored sensor data, and environmental measurements. Since environmental measurements may include a position calculation from a triangulation positioner (e.g., a GPS device), the receiver hub/locate engine 108 could parse the position calculation and use it to refine a location estimate for the tag data packet.
Preferably, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may access an individual database to determine tag-individual correlators or sensor-individual correlators. Individual data (e.g., an individual profile) may be stored in a server, in tag memory, in sensor memory, or in other storage accessible via a network or communication system, including tag data or additional stored sensor data as explained previously.
In some embodiments, by comparing data accessed using a sensor-individual correlator, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may associate an individual with a sensor information packet received from a sensor, and/or may associate an individual with such sensor. Because the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may associate a sensor position estimate with a sensor information packet, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may also estimate an individual position for the associated individual.
In another embodiment, by comparing data accessed using a tag-sensor correlator, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may associate a sensor with a tag data packet received from a RF location tag 102. Because the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may associate a location estimate with a tag data packet, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may also create a sensor location estimate for the associated sensor. By comparing a location estimate for a RF location tag with a sensor location estimate or a sensor position estimate, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may associate a RF location tag with a sensor, or may associate a tag data packet with a sensor information packet. The receiver hub/locate engine 108 could also determine a new or refined tag-sensor correlator based on this association.
In still another embodiment, by comparing a location estimate for a RF location tag with an individual location estimate or an individual position estimate, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may associate a RF location tag with an individual, or may associate a tag data packet with an individual. The receiver hub/locate engine 108 could also determine a new or refined tag-individual correlator based on this association.
In one embodiment, by comparing a location estimate for a sensor with an individual location estimate or an individual position estimate, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may associate a sensor with an individual, or may associate a sensor information packet with an individual. The receiver hub/locate engine 108 could also determine a new or refined sensor-individual correlator based on this association.
Data derived or extracted from tag signals transmitted from one or more RF location tags is referred to herein as “tag derived data” and shall include, without limitation, tag data, tag UID, tag-individual correlator, tag-sensor correlator, tag data packets, blink data, time measurements (e.g. time of arrival, time difference of arrival, phase), signal measurements (e.g., signal strength, signal direction, signal polarization, signal phase) and tag location data (e.g., including tag location estimates). Information or data derived or extracted from sensor signals transmitted from one or more sensors is referred to herein as “sensor derived data” and shall include, without limitation, sensor UID, additional stored sensor data, sensor-individual correlator, environmental measurements, sensor information packets, position calculations (including sensor position estimates), position information, identity information, tag-sensor correlator, and associated sensor data. Data derived or extracted from stored individual data is referred to herein as “individual profile information” and shall include, without limitation, tag-individual correlator, sensor-individual correlator, identity information, name, uniform number and team, biometric data, tag position on individual. In various embodiments, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may transmit tag derived data, sensor derived data, individual profile information, various combinations thereof, and/or any information from the GIS, the field database, the monitored area database, and the individual database to the receiver processing and analytics system 110.
Receiver Processing and Analytics SystemReceiver hub/location engine 108 may further be configured to provide tag location data and/or sensor derived data and/or individual profile information to the receiver processing and analytics system 110. The receiver processing and analytics system 110 may include a tag data/sensor data filter 112 configured for receiving the tag location data and sensor derived data and individual profile information from the receiver hub 108.
The tag data/sensor data filter 112 may be configured for associating tag derived data (including tag location data) and sensor derived data to a particular individual, filtering tag derived data from sensor derived data, and routing the tag location data and the sensor derived data to an individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 and an HFOP engine 116, respectively.
The tag data/sensor filter 112 accesses an individual role database 114 to identify historical or contextual information related to the individual and/or role data for the individual (e.g., data indicating that a first individual is a particular football player in football game application, data indicating that a second individual is a particular patient in a hospital application, data indicating that a third individual is a race car in a motor sports application, etc.) In another embodiment, historical information related to the health, fitness, operation and/or performance of an individual may be provided by the individual role database 114. For example, a medical history may be provided for a particular individual by the individual role database 114.
The individual role database 114 may be populated with information (e.g., tag-individual correlators, sensor-individual correlators, tag-sensor correlators, etc.) that allows the tag data/sensor filter 112 to determine whether location tags and sensors are to be associated with or correlated to a particular individual. In one embodiment, the location tags and/or sensors comprise a unique identifier (e.g., tag UID, sensor UID) that is transmitted to the receiver hub/locate engine 108 and passed to the tag data/sensor data filter 112. That tag data/sensor data filter 112 uses the unique identifiers to correlate the tag and sensor derived data to individual profiles (e.g., individual data) stored to the individual role database 114. In another embodiment, the individual role database 114 is configured to associate the sensors and/or sensor derived data with a particular individual, which will be described in
The individual role database 114 may further include role information associated with individuals, location tags, and/or sensors. For example, particular individuals may be associated with a particular role (e.g., John Doe/quarterback).
The tag data/sensor data filter 112 may then be configured to filter tag derived data (including tag location data) from sensor derived data and provide sensor derived data to a health, fitness, operation and performance engine 116 (HFOP engine 116) and provide tag derived data to an individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120.
The HFOP engine 116 may be configured to receive sensor derived data from the tag data/sensor data filter 112. In one embodiment, the HFOP engine 116 may be further configured to receive historical or contextual information related to the individual and/or a role of the individual. The HFOP engine 116 may further be configured to access a sensor based HFOP models database 118. The sensor based HFOP models database 118 may be populated with historical sensor derived data related to individuals (e.g., a baseline snapshot of individual health parameters suggesting an individual is healthy, sick, injured, or the like). The historical data may be generated from capturing sensor derived data from an individual equipped with sensors. The sensor based HFOP models database 118 may, additionally or alternatively, be populated manually or programmatically populated with health related data from patient studies, machine diagnostics studies, and the like.
In one embodiment, historical information related to the health, fitness, operation and/or performance of a particular individual may be provided by the HFOP models database 118. That is, the HFOP models database 118 may include at least one of health history data, fitness history data, operation level history data, or performance level history data for an individual. The health history data, fitness history data, operation level history data, or performance level history data for the individual may be manually input (e.g., inputting that a particular individual has hypertension) or may be acquired by prior monitoring, thus capturing tag derived data and/or sensor derived data from a previous monitoring session.
In some embodiments, the HFOP engine 116 may aggregate data related to one or more sensors for a particular individual over a period of time (e.g., heart rate data for one play for a football player in a football game, sweat rate data for a runner during a race, blood pressure data for an elderly patient on a walk, etc.). Using the historical and contextual data related to the individual and/or role of the individual, the HFOP engine 116 may further be configured to access the sensor based HFOP models database 118 and determine a list of probable HFOP statuses. For example, high heart rate data for a football player during a play may indicate that the player currently engaged in a high level of exertion (e.g., HFOP status 1) or perhaps is experiencing the onset of a stroke (e.g., HFOP status 2). The HFOP engine 116 uses other sensor derived data from other sensors to determine whether HFOP status 1 is more or less probable than HFOP status 2. Such information is fed to the HFOP status engine 124 as discussed in greater detail below.
In one embodiment, the HFOP engine 116 may be configured to output one or more probable outcomes or alternative selected data of interest. In another embodiment, the HFOP engine 116 may also be configured to output the aggregated sensor derived data, the historical and contextual data related to the individual and/or the role of the individual related to one or more probable outcomes or selected data of interest. In still another embodiment, the HFOP engine 116 may be configured to output various health parameters for the individual per unit time.
The individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 may be configured to receive tag derived data (including tag location data) from the tag data/sensor data filter 112. In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 may further be configured to receive historical or contextual information related to the individual and/or a role of the individual. The individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 may further be configured to access an individual dynamics/kinetics models database 122.
The individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 may compare the tag location data and individual role data to individual dynamics/kinetics models to determine aspects of the individual dynamics or movement kinetics. The dynamics/kinetics model database 122 may comprise models of different aspects or dimensions that may be based on past tag location data (e.g., tags fixed to various appendages of a monitored individual) or other data generated by a model generation engine or other tools. The models may include, without limitation, models for a particular individual profile (e.g., John Smith), an individual type (e.g., quarterback, a horse, a stock car, etc.), and the like. Such models may consider all three dimensions (x, y, z) of the tag location data for each tag (e.g., 202 of
The individual dynamics/kinetics models database 122 may be populated with actual tag data drawn from particular actions (e.g., running on a track, running in a soccer game, walking, throwing, running, limping, falling, spraining an ankle or the like). The historical data may be generated from capturing data from an individual equipped with location tags or sensors, performing actions and storing the data with the associated action. The individual dynamics/kinetics models database 122 may, additionally or alternatively, be populated with average or aggregate data that may indicate particular actions. In another embodiment, position history data, such as historical information related to the dynamic and/or kinetic information of a particular individual (e.g., John Smith), may be stored and provided by the individual dynamics/kinetics models database 122.
In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 determines a multi-dimensional individual location per unit time (e.g., individual location data) for each individual based on the tag location data, the individual role data, and the individual dynamics/kinetics models. Such multi-dimensional individual location data may include (1) relative position of the individual relative to a monitored area (e.g., a field of play, race track, etc.), (2) general orientation of the individual (e.g., standing, squatting, laying the ground, sitting, etc.), and (3) a specific orientation of the individual and/or various appendances of the individual (e.g., preparing to pass, in a three-point stance, in a ball-carrying position, in a tackling position, negotiating a turn, etc.).
The individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 uses the real time tag location data stream from the tag data/sensor data filter 112, as well as the individual role data, to provide accurate information about what a particular individual is doing in real time. In some embodiments, the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 may further use sensor derived data, received from the tag data/sensor data filter 112 in the depicted embodiment, to aid in determining not only where the individual is, but also how that individual's location is changing with time, velocity, acceleration, deceleration, orientation, or the like. For example, in one embodiment, the sensor derived data may comprise accelerometer data that may indicate that an individual (or portion of an individual) is accelerating or decelerating. The individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 outputs multi-dimensional individual location data per unit time.
The HFOP engine 116 and the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 are each configured to output data streams to a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status engine 124. The HFOP status engine 124 is configured to receive the ranked list of probable HFOP statuses from the HFOP engine 116 and the multi-dimensional individual location data from the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 and determine health, fitness, operation, or performance statuses for the individual. For example, in one embodiment, the HFOP status engine 124 may determine that the football player having the high heart rate discussed above is likely experiencing the onset of a stroke because the received multi-dimensional individual location data suggests the player is sitting on a bench and has not recently undertaken a high level of physical exertion. In such an embodiment, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured to send an alert to medical staff.
In some embodiments, the HFOP status engine 124 may further be configured to receive location data, sensor derived data, and historical or contextual data related to the individual and/or role of the individual related to the location data and associated probable actions. Such information may be used to establish a baseline of health, fitness, operation, or performance for a given individual that may be stored as part of the individual's profile data. In some embodiments, such baseline may include a baseline of health, fitness, operation, or performance parameters.
In some embodiments, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured to determine a status (e.g., healthy, sick, injured, hurt, active, not active, powered down, etc.) by comparing real time (or near real time) data concerning an individual's health, fitness, operation, or performance parameters to a stored snapshot or pre-determined threshold.
In one embodiment, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured for determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparing the tag derived data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and based on comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models. In one embodiment, HFOP status may be determined based on whether particular sensor derived data satisfies particular threshold values related to health, fitness, operation and/or performance models. HFOP status may additionally or alternatively be based on whether particular multidimensional individual location data satisfies particular threshold values (e.g., perhaps values based on an individual's baseline snapshot or generally published data regarding movements or positions of a “healthy” individual of a certain age) related to dynamics and/or kinetic information. As one skilled in the art would understand, satisfying a threshold may include exceeding a threshold in some embodiments (e.g., blood pressure may exceed “healthy” threshold) or may include falling below a threshold for some embodiments (e.g., sweat rate may fall below “healthy” rate indicating possible dehydration).
In one embodiment, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured to associate the determined status and/or action with another type of data (e.g., associating each play that a player appears in with the player). In one embodiment, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured to monitor, store or track one or more individuals, one or more of health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual or individuals, and/or one or more zones or location systems for an individual. In another embodiment, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured to monitor a location system for a pre-defined event, unexpected, and/or an abnormal event. An event may be a particular action in a given context or associated with particular sensor derived data.
In some embodiments, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured to cause an alert in response to a determination of a pre-defined event (e.g., a stroke, an injury, etc.), unexpected event, and/or abnormal event. In another embodiment, an alert may be sent upon determining whether the determined HFOP status satisfies a threshold value. In some embodiments, particular tag derived data and/or sensor derived data may trigger an alert, and thus bypass a status determination (e.g., heart rate approaching zero, or ‘flat lining’). In another embodiment, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured for sending a message or action related information to a parent, trainer, doctor, nurse, paramedic or the like.
Determining a status (e.g., an HFOP status) can be done in many ways. A sensor-based HFOP model database or an individual dynamics kinetics model database can be used to collect various models. A model may have multiple attributes that are represented by data fields. As one skilled in the art of databases would understand, a particular model may be selected by choosing one or more fields of interest that correspond with field values known from the tag derived data and/or the sensor derived data and/or individual role data. By comparing the fields of interest with the known field values, a status can be determined.
One way to determine compare the fields of interest with the known field values is to match the field of interest to the known field value.
A second way to compare the fields of interest with the known field values is to develop a control chart. A control chart uses a known or estimated distribution of values from a population of observations for the field of interest to determine an average (mean) value and a standard deviation. The model designer may set the mean and standard deviation based on the field of interest, or on a calculated value related to the field of interest, such as the differential between the field of interest and a standard multi-variable regression model estimate based on the field of interest. Two control limits are established, an upper control limit at three standard deviations more than the mean, and a lower control limit at three standard deviations less than the mean (i.e., a number other than three may be chosen by the model designer). As known field values are determined, each can be added to the control chart. If an observation exceeds the control limits (either higher than the upper control limit or lower than the lower control limit) the status can be deemed to have changed. Also, if individual field values continue to increase or decrease at least seven (or another value chosen by the model designer) times, the data is said to be trending and the status can be deemed to have changed.
A third way to compare the fields of interest with the known field values is to cluster the values from a population of observations for the field of interest. Various clustering algorithms are known in the art, including incremental clustering algorithms, divide-and-conquer based clustering algorithms, data sampling and summarization techniques, Euclidean distance based clustering algorithms, and kernel clustering algorithms. This may have the benefit of significantly reducing the data storage required, as a very large number of observations can be characterized by a smaller number of multi-variable clusters. By comparing known field values to variables for each cluster, a probability that tag location data is the same status as other observations in that cluster can be determined.
A fourth way to compare the fields of interest with the known field values is to calculate a covariance between past observations for the field of interest and current observations for the known field values (e.g., tag derived data, sensor derived data, and/or identity/role data). If the covariance is above a threshold value (such as 0.97) the status can be matched to the selected model.
In some embodiments, if the status is changed such that an event is identified by the HFOP status engine 124 an alert may be generated. In some embodiments, if the status changes from an undetermined status to a determined status then an event may be indicated by the HFOP engine as an alert.
In the depicted embodiment, receiver hub/locate engine 108 receives receiver signals and outputs tag derived data (including tag location data) and sensor derived data to a tag data/sensor data filter 112 of a receiver processing and analytics system 110′ structured in accordance with one embodiment.
While in certain embodiments, the receiver hub/location engine 108 is configured to correlate tag location data to tag UID and optionally sensor UID, in the depicted embodiment, the tag data/sensor data filter 112 may be configured to perform one or more additional correlations or associations. For example, the tag data/sensor data filter 112 may be configured to associate the tag UID with an individual (e.g., Jane Smith), the tag UID with a role, the tag location data with an individual or role, and the like.
In one embodiment, the tag data/sensor data filter 112 may associate an individual (e.g., an individual name, unique identifier, etc.) with the tag UID while also associating sensor derived data with the tag UID. In still other embodiments, the tag data/sensor data filter 112 may use a registration database to associate a tag UID with an individual.
In some embodiments, in order to monitor the health or fitness of an individual, which may be associated with a tag UID as shown in
Returning to
In one embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 is disposed in communication with historical data store 440 and individual dynamics/kinetics models database 122. The individual dynamics/kinetics models database 122 may be configured to store data related to an individual. For example, referring to the example above related to a human athlete individual who is standing, walking, or running, and where a tag is positioned at the individual's shoulder (e.g., tag 202a of
In one embodiment, the minimum stature value could vary by role (e.g., tagged football players may be expected to be taller than tagged horse racing jockeys, etc.). In another embodiment, the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 may calculate a stature value (ht) at various times (t) by subtracting the height of tag 202g (zg) from the height of tag 202a (za) (i.e., ht=za−zg) based on tag location data from the receiver hub/locate engine 108 and individual data from the tag data/sensor data filter 112. In an embodiment where individual data may be stored on the tag (e.g., 202a), the individual data may be forwarded through the receiver hub/locate engine 108 to the tag data/sensor data filter 112.
In one embodiment, the individual dynamics engine 120 may store the individual stature value ht as time series data in historical data store 440 or it could gather additional descriptive statistics such as a mode, median, standard deviation, number of observations for any or all of ht, za and zg, and then store the descriptive statistics in historical data store 440. In one embodiment, time series data or descriptive statistics stored in historical data store 440 may include individual data or role data that may be used for additional context in building individual dynamic models as stored in the individual dynamics models database122.
In one embodiment, during monitoring, the receiver hub/locate engine 108 may determine and collect tag derived data (including tag location information) and sensor derived data and provide such data to the tag data/sensor data filter 112. The tag data/sensor data filter 112 may access and/or utilize individual data from the individual data store 410 or role data from the role data store 420 before providing information to the individual dynamics engine 120.
In one embodiment, the individual dynamics engine 120 may be configured to calculate hT=zaT−zgT for a particular time T, and compare that to an expected value of h from the individual dynamics models 122. The results of the comparison are then provided to HFOP status engine 124, which may provide an alert to a coach, medic, parent or other appropriate personnel. In one embodiment, an alert may be provided if zaT is less than some small fraction of measured stature (e.g., the measured distance from the ground to a shoulder mounted tag) or if zat is less than some fraction of minimum stature (e.g., the expended or average distance from the ground to a shoulder mounted tag), suggesting that the athlete is crouched down or laying down. By considering zaT−zgT, in one embodiment, the system may determine that an individual is bent over or laying down, even if such individual is not on the ground.
In another embodiment, an alert may be provided if hT is less than some fraction of descriptive statistics such as the mode or median value of ht or zat for a selected individual or for a compilation of individuals with a similar role. In another embodiment, an alert may be provided if ht is less than the mean value of ht minus 3 times the standard deviation of ht suggesting that the recent value of ht differs from past observations more than would be expected from random measurement variation. In another embodiment, a control chart for h could be constructed based on historical values of ht, and multiple observations of hT may be compared to the control chart. Using well-established methods of statistical process control, a trend of increasing hT, decreasing hT, or observations of hT beyond established control limits may be used to initiate an alert. Although the preceding examples have been used to describe various embodiments of the invention, it should be appreciated that one skilled in the art may utilize additional embodiments.
In some embodiments, the HFOP status engine 124 may be configured to access zone data from a zone data store 430 to determine whether or how to produce an alert. The term zone data as used herein refers to data or other information that might define one or more geographic or environmental areas, zones, or sectors. Such “zones” may or may not correlate to any real-world boundaries (e.g., a room may be divided into four zones regardless of whether any actual boundaries, i.e., partitions, walls, etc., exist in the room). In one embodiment, an individual may be located in one of multiple zones in an area monitored by a RTLS system, such as the system described with reference to
In some embodiments, the tag data/sensor data filter 112 may use zone data from the zone data store 430 to determine whether the individual (or tag(s) associated with the individual) is positioned in a particular zone. The HFOP status engine 124 may use information about the zone stored in zone data store 430 in determining whether to produce an alert for any embodiment described herein.
As discussed in connection with
In some embodiments, sensor derived data may additionally or alternatively be used as a determining factor by the HFOP status engine 124. For instance, as discussed above, the HFOP status engine sensor-based HFOP models 118 may be created and/or utilized to show that the typical body temperature for a human athlete individual is approximately 37 degrees Celsius. The model may be further refined (or one or more other models provided) based on data collected during a registration process. For example a model may be refined in which a body temperature is measured by a sensor (and transmitted as environment measurements) and later associated with the individual as individual data. In another embodiment, sensor derived data may be stored based on an individual's role, for example body temperature may be stored based on the athlete's role. In another embodiment, sensor derived data (e.g., body temperature) may be stored as historical time-series data or descriptive statistics data based on multiple sensor readings.
In one embodiment, during a monitoring process, a sensor (e.g., a GPS equipped smartphone having a barcode imaging application) may be capable of communicating both sensor derived data and a position calculation or position information as in
In one embodiment, the tag data/sensor data filter 112 may obtain tag derived data (including tag location data) and sensor derived data from the receiver hub/locate engine 108 or from a combination of the receiver hub/locate engine 108 and stored data accessed from the individual data store 410, the role data store 420, and the zone data store 430. In one embodiment, the tag data/sensor data filter 112 may provide sensor derived data (such as the temperature measured by a thermometer) to the HFOP engine 116 where it may be utilized in a comparison to sensor-based HFOP models accessed from the HFOP models database 118. In one embodiment, results of the comparison may then be provided to HFOP status engine 124, which may then provide an alert to a coach, medic, parent or other appropriate personnel.
In another embodiment, tag location data and the relative position of the applicable sensor or sensors (as may be determined based on the tag location data or sensor based position calculations or position information) may be used to determine if the athlete's temperature was measured orally, under the arm, or rectally. The sensor derived data and tag derived data (including tag location data) may be used by the HFOP engine 116 to compare to the measured temperature data to sensor-based HFOP models correlated to body temperature measurement position. The results of this comparison may then be provided to HFOP status engine 124, which may provide an alert.
Again, as discussed above, individual data such as Jim or Mary, role data such as water boy or running back, or zone data such as Lambeau Field or sauna may also be provided by the tag data/sensor data filter 112 to the HFOP engine 116 in order to add context to the sensor derived data, such as temperature measured by the thermometer.
In some embodiments, sensor derived data from sensors not associated with the individual (e.g., taken by sensors not mounted to the individual but still routed wired or wirelessly to the receiver hub/locate engine 108) may also be collected by the tag data/sensor data filter 112 and provided to the HFOP engine 116 and/or individual dynamics engine 120. For instance, an ambient temperature thermometer sensor could provide important context to determining an appropriate body temperature at the HFOP engine 116 or determining an appropriate amount of time spent by the water cooler to the individual dynamics engine 120.
Health, Fitness, Operation, and Performance MonitoringFor example, in reference to
As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, any such computer program instructions may be loaded onto a computer or other programmable apparatus (e.g., hardware) to produce a machine, such that the resulting computer or other programmable apparatus provides for implementation of the functions specified in the flowcharts' block(s). These computer program instructions may also be stored in a non-transitory computer-readable storage memory that may direct a computer or other programmable apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable storage memory produce an article of manufacture, the execution of which implements the function specified in the flowcharts' block(s). The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable apparatus to cause a series of operations to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide operations for implementing the functions specified in the flowcharts' block(s).
As such, the operations of
Accordingly, blocks of the flowcharts support combinations of means for performing the specified functions and combinations of operations for performing the specified functions. It will also be understood that one or more blocks of the flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the flowcharts, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based computer systems which perform the specified functions, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
In some embodiments, certain ones of the operations herein may be modified or further amplified as described below. Moreover, in some embodiments additional optional operations may also be included. It should be appreciated that each of the modifications, optional additions or amplifications below may be included with the operations above either alone or in combination with any others among the features described herein.
Receiver Processing and Analytics System ProcessesAs shown in block 710 of
As shown in block 720 of
As shown in block 730 of
As shown in block 740 of
As shown in block 750 of
As shown in block 760 of
In another embodiment, the apparatus may be configured for causing an alert in response to determining a presence of a particular status, such as for example, unexpected status, an abnormal status, or a pre-defined status (e.g., stroke, injury, etc.).
In one embodiment, that apparatus may be configured for sending a message and/or status related information to a parent, trainer, doctor, nurse, paramedic or the like. The message may indicate, for example, that help is requested and/or required. The message and/or information may comprise the location of the first individual. In another embodiment, the message or information may comprise information related to the abnormal or unexpected status, or the pre-defined status that was determined.
Tag Data/Sensor Data Filter ProcessingAs shown in block 810 of
As shown in block 820 of
As shown in block 830 of
The association may be performed by identifying an identifier (e.g., a tag-individual correlator, sensor-individual correlator, etc.) included in the packetized data associated with particular tag derived data and/or sensor derived data. The identifier may then be checked against individual identifier data by accessing an individual role database. The individual role database 114, as described earlier, may include data associating unique identifiers to particular individuals, and/or particular individuals to particular roles.
As shown in block 840 of
As shown in block 850 of
As shown in block 860 of
As shown in block 910 of
As shown in block 920 of
Identifying historical sensor derived data and/or associated models may be performed by comparing sensor derived data and associated information received from an individual to sensor derived data and associated information related to a historical sensor derived data and/or models comprising a combination of historical sensor derived data (e.g., heart rate, breathing rate etc. related to a stroke). In some circumstances, the comparison may yield a match with a particular model. In other circumstances, no precise match is identified but the comparison identifies one or more models most likely associated with the received sensor derived data and associated information (e.g., individual data, role data, etc.).
As shown in block 930 of
As shown in block 940 of
As shown in block 950 of
As shown in block 1010 of
As shown in block 1020 of
Identifying associated models may be performed by comparing tag derived data and associated information received from an individual to tag derived data and associated information related to a model. While no model may be a match, the apparatus may be configured to identify similar models or those most closely associated with a particular individual, position, or role.
As shown in block 1030 of
In one example, the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 is configured to determine a multi-dimensional individual location per unit time (e.g., individual location data) for an individual based on the tag location data, the individual role data, and the individual dynamics/kinetics models. Such multi-dimensional individual location may include (1) relative position of the individual relative to a monitored area (e.g., a field of play, race track, etc.) or zone, (2) general orientation of the individual (e.g., standing, squatting, laying the ground, sitting, etc.), and (3) a specific orientation of the individual including the orientation of one or more appendages (e.g., preparing to pass, in a three-point stance, in a ball-carrying position, in a tackling position, negotiating a turn, etc.).
The individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 uses the real time tag location data stream from the tag data/sensor data filter 112, as well as the individual role data to provide accurate information about what a particular individual is doing in real time. Thus, as shown in block 1040 of
As shown in block 1050 of
As shown in block 1110 of
As shown in block 1120 of
HFOP status determination may be made utilizing the one or more probable actions and/or the multi-dimensional individual location data per unit time determined by the individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120 utilizing tag data, and associated information and/or the one or more probable statuses determined by the HFOP engine 116 utilizing sensor derived data, and associated information. In some embodiments, HFOP status determination may utilize one or more of the tag location data associated with each of the one or more probable actions, the sensor derived data associated with each of one or more probable statuses, and/or associated information, such as the historical or contextual information related to an individual and/or a role of the individual.
As shown in block 1130 of
In some embodiment, as shown in block 1140 of
In some embodiments, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to send a message or HFOP status related information to a parent, trainer, doctor, nurse, paramedic or the like indicating that help is requested and/or required. The message and/or information may comprise information indicating where the individual is (e.g., the tag location data) and/or the HFOP status. In another embodiment, the message may comprise particular sensor derived data or tag derived data (including tag location data) related to the determined HFOP status.
In one embodiment of the present invention, to utilize a person's medical history in conjunction with tag derived data or sensor derived data to monitor the health and fitness of the person, data received from location tags and/or sensors may be associated with a particular individual.
As shown in block 1202 of
As shown in block 1206 of
As shown in block 1210 of
As shown in block 1214 of
As shown in block 1218 of
As shown in block 1222 of
As shown in block 1224 of
In another embodiment, it may be useful to capture sensor derived data from one or more sensors associated with or near a particular location tag and packetize the data for sending to a receiver, processing system or the like.
As shown in block 1226 of
As shown in block 1230 of
In one example embodiment,
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, where the first individual 1310 is wearing first location tag 1350 on, for example, their shoulder or chest area, a receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to utilize tag derived data from the location tag to determine if the first individual 1310 is ok (e.g. not on the ground, unmoving).
In one example embodiment, a comparison of tag derived data from the first location tag 1350 with one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models may determine one or more probable actions. In one embodiment, a HFOP status may be determined based on the comparison. If the determined status exceeds a threshold, and thereby for example, indicates a presence of an abnormality, an alert may be caused. For example, one HFOP model may indicate a falling action if tag location data indicates a person is on the ground.
In another example embodiment, a receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to utilize tag derived data from the location tag and historical data and/or contextual data to determine if the first individual 1310 is ok. For example, where the first individual 1310 is on the ground for a short period of time, a comparison of tag derived data from the first location tag 1350 in conjunction with historical and/or contextual data may be associated with one or more probable actions, as determined by HFOP or individual dynamics/kinetics models that indicate that there is no problem. However, in some embodiments, when the first individual 1310 is on the ground for a pre-defined period of time, a different HFOP or individual dynamics/kinetics model may be implicated, which may yield a determination of a different action (e.g., injured).
In another example, the first individual may be equipped with two location tags, such as for example, a first location tag 1350, 1350′ on their chest or shoulder area and a second location tag 1360, 1360′ on their feet area. A receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to utilize data from the first location tag 1350 and the second location tag 1360 to determine if the first individual 1310 is ok. For example, based on a height or distance between the location tag 1350, 1350′ and the second location tag 1360, 1360′, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may determine that the first individual 1310 is not ok and the second individual 1320 is ok, because for example the height or distance between the first location tag 1350 and the second location tag 1360 on the first individual 1310 is less than a predetermined threshold. Whereas on the second individual 1320, the first location tag 1350′ is greater than a predetermined threshold above the second location tag 1360′.
Second Example EmbodimentIn one example embodiment of the present invention, historical and contextual data, such as an individual's medical history data, may be utilized in conjunction with location data and sensor derived data to monitor the health and fitness of a person.
As shown in block 1410 of
As shown in block 1420 of
In one embodiment, where the individual is a human being or an animal, as discussed above, a sensor may be one of a blood pressure sensor for measuring blood pressure, a heart rate sensor for measuring heart rate, a body temperature sensor for measuring body temperature, a microphone (e.g., other sensors configured to determining or representing sounds, etc.) for determining sounds such as speech, whimpers, or screams, a mental response sensor for measuring a mental response time, an eye dilation sensor for measuring dilation of the eyes, and a breathing rate sensor for measuring a breathing rate.
In another embodiment, where the individual is an object such as a car, a sensor may be one of a throttle position sensor, brake position sensor, steering position sensor, axle, wheel or drive shaft sensor, rotary position sensor, crankshaft position sensor, engine coolant temperature sensor, water temperature sensor, oil temperature sensor, fuel gauge sensor, oil gauge sensor, suspension travel sensor, accelerometer, pressure sensor.
In some embodiments, where for example, a human being or an animal is associated with an object, such as a race car, sensors may be provided from both embodiments above, such as for example throttle position sensor, ambient temperature sensor and the like in a race car, and heart rate sensor, sweat rate sensor and the like on the driver.
As shown in block 1430 of
The specific individual may have associated historic data, such as for example, health data, medical history data or the like. Medical history data may comprise for example, baseline measurements for one or more of a person's blood pressure, heart rate, mental response, eye dilation, and breathing rate. Associated historical data may comprise, for example, flexibility related data, top speed, acceleration, reaction time or the like.
In one embodiment, associating tag derived data and/or sensor derived data may include capturing an identifier from the data collected from the location tag or sensor and determining a person that is associated with the identifier. However, other methods may be used for associating data from a location tag or sensor with an athlete and may not necessitate a location tag or sensor having an identifier and/or having an athlete pre-associated with that identifier.
As shown in block 1440 of
In one embodiment, an individual (e.g., a football player) may be equipped with a location tag on each foot. A receive processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to capture and store tag location data from each of the location tags. The receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may further be configured to determine one or more attributes of the individual utilizing the tag location data, for example, gait, a top speed and acceleration. The receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to then monitor one or more attributes and determine a probable action based on the currently determined attributes (e.g., running top speed during a pass route). The historic information may be utilized in the action determination.
The action determination may repeatedly, over a period of time, indicate a same or similar action for a particular individual when the attribute data does not change or changes at a particular level (e.g., the first individual does not slow down as the game progresses or the first individual slows down 0.2 kilometers per hour each quarter), which may be determined to be expected and/or normal. Thus, a pre-defined output may include output to a user interface (e.g., GUI) or storing to a hard drive.
However, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to calculate, for example, a speed during a pass route, and determine a second action if an abnormality or unexpected calculation occurs. For example, if a current attribute data calculation shows that a wide receiver is slowing down more than a predetermined amount during a pass route, or if a stride length is shorter by a predetermined amount, of if a gait is off by a predetermined amount, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to determine a second action (e.g., sprained ankle, dehydration, torn ACL, or the like).
In another embodiment, a context may be considered. A context may be related to a particular situation, such as a specific sport, a time of day, a weather condition (e.g., temperature, precipitation, humidity or the like), a game circumstance (e.g., no huddle versus huddling by an offense in football, or base running versus playing defense in baseball) or the like.
For example, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to consider or factor in contextual information before or during action determination. In another embodiment, action determination and in particular, sensor based HFOP models and/or individual dynamics/kinetics models are a function of particular contextual information (e.g., top speed in the rain versus top speed in dry conditions).
In one example, if multi-dimensional individual location data of a person running at top speed is determined to show that the individual slowed down quickly and has fallen to the ground, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to consider contextual information before action determination. For example, contextual information may reveal that the person was running on a base path or carrying a ball toward a line of scrimmage just before going to the ground, and thus, an action determination may yield “sliding” or “tackled”. However, alternatively, contextual information may reveal that the individual was in open space and no one was around, thus making an action determination based on the slowing down and falling, any one of a number of unexpected or abnormal actions.
In another embodiment, contextual information may include information regarding one or more zones. For example, a location system may be divided into various zones (e.g., a football field and a sideline area). Thus, attribute data which may be cause for alarm in some cases, such as an individual lying down at home plate, may not be cause for alarm in another location, such as an individual lying down in the dugout. In a care providing facility situation, zone division may indicate a bedroom, bathroom, family room couch, vs. garage, kitchen, etc. For example, an individual lying down in a bathroom may yield one action determination, whereas an individual lying down in a bedroom may yield a second action determination.
In another embodiment of the present invention, adversarial data may be considered. Thus, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to consider or factor in adversarial data before or during action determination. In one embodiment, one or more historical attributes related to a first individual may be a function of tag derived data captured from a second individual. For example, depending on whom a second individual is and/or what a second individual is doing, a first individual may act differently, such as running different speeds, turning, cutting, jumping, positioning himself differently or the like, or in the context of race car driving, accelerating, decelerating, taking a different line around a turn or the like. In one embodiment, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to measure and/or calculate relative position information. In another embodiment, relative reaction, speed or acceleration of a first tag (e.g., individual or body part) relative to a second tag (e.g., a second individual or second body part). The receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may be configured to then utilize the relative attribute data in the action determination (e.g., decreasing elbow tag position and hand tag position may lead to an action determination of a broken arm).
In some example embodiments, the receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′ may further be configured to consider whom or what the second tag is associated with, what a second the individual associated with the second tag position is doing, how the individual associated with the second tag location is performing as contextual information.
As shown in block 1450 of
In one embodiment, historical data, for example, from a person's medical history, may be used to provide a list of one or more probable statuses of an individual. For example, by knowing an individual's historical heart rate, breathing rate, and/or sweat rate, a combination of sensor derived data may indicate a moderate level of stress and thus one status determination for a first individual. Whereas the same combination of sensor derived data may indicate a high level of stress in a second individual and thus, a second status determination (e.g., panic attack).
In one embodiment, the sensor based HFOP models that are used in status determination may be a function of medical history data. For example, where medical history data shows one or more concussions, particular thresholds and/or tolerances related to sensor derived data may be adjusted such that status determination of a particular status may be more likely and/or is more conservative (e.g., erring on the side of caution). For example, acceptable tolerances in differences in reaction time, eye dilation data or the like may be lowered in individuals who have suffered concussions in their past.
As shown in block 1460 of
In one embodiment, HFOP status determination may then be compared to one or more pre-defined normal, abnormal or unexpected HFOP statuses. For example, pre-defined abnormal HFOP status may include pulled muscles, broken bones, concussions, or the like. For example, multi-dimensional location data from a person's knees and/or ankles may show a progression of running at top speed, making a quick turn, and slowing down and/or hopping, where one probable HFOP status may be pulling a muscle, which is turn may be identified as an abnormal or unexpected HFOP status.
As shown in block 1470 of
As will be appreciated, any such computer program instructions and/or other type of code may be loaded onto a computer, processor or other programmable apparatus's circuitry to produce a machine, such that the computer, processor other programmable circuitry that execute the code on the machine create the means for implementing various functions, including those described herein.
As described above and as will be appreciated based on this disclosure, embodiments of the present invention may be configured as methods, mobile devices, backend network devices, and the like. Accordingly, embodiments may comprise various means including entirely of hardware or any combination of software and hardware. Furthermore, embodiments may take the form of a computer program product on at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program instructions (e.g., computer software) embodied in the storage medium. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including non-transitory hard disks, CD-ROMs, flash memory, optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices.
Embodiments of the present invention have been described above with reference to block diagrams and flowchart illustrations of methods, apparatuses, systems and computer program products. It will be understood that each block of the circuit diagrams and process flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the circuit diagrams and process flowcharts, respectively, can be implemented by various means including computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be loaded onto a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the computer program product includes the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus create a means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable storage device that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable storage device produce an article of manufacture including computer-readable instructions for implementing the function discussed herein. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process such that the instructions that execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions discussed herein.
Accordingly, blocks of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations support combinations of means for performing the specified functions, combinations of steps for performing the specified functions and program instruction means for performing the specified functions. It will also be understood that each block of the circuit diagrams and process flowcharts, and combinations of blocks in the circuit diagrams and process flowcharts, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based computer systems that perform the specified functions or steps, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
Computing Device ArchitectureIn some embodiments of the present invention, an apparatus, such as a receiver processing and analytics system 110 or 110′, tag data/sensor data filter 112, HFOP engine 116, individual dynamics/kinetics engine 120, or HFOP status engine 124 may be embodied by a computing device. The computing device may include or be associated with an apparatus 1500 as shown in
In some embodiments, the processor 1522 (and/or co-processors or any other processing circuitry assisting or otherwise associated with the processor) may be in communication with the memory device 1524 via a bus for passing information among components of the apparatus. The memory device may include, for example, one or more volatile and/or non-volatile memories. In other words, for example, the memory device may be an electronic storage device (e.g., a computer readable storage medium) comprising gates configured to store data (e.g., bits) that may be retrievable by a machine (e.g., a computing device like the processor). The memory device may be configured to store information, data, content, applications, instructions, or the like for enabling the apparatus 1500 to carry out various functions in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention. For example, the memory device could be configured to buffer input data for processing by the processor. Additionally or alternatively, the memory device could be configured to store instructions for execution by the processor.
As noted above, the apparatus 1500 may be embodied by a computing device 10 configured to employ an example embodiment of the present invention. However, in some embodiments, the apparatus may be embodied as a chip or chip set. In other words, the apparatus may comprise one or more physical packages (e.g., chips) including materials, components and/or wires on a structural assembly (e.g., a baseboard). The structural assembly may provide physical strength, conservation of size, and/or limitation of electrical interaction for component circuitry included thereon. The apparatus may therefore, in some cases, be configured to implement an embodiment of the present invention on a single chip or as a single “system on a chip.” As such, in some cases, a chip or chipset may constitute means for performing one or more operations for providing the functionalities described herein.
The processor 1522 may be embodied in a number of different ways. For example, the processor may be embodied as one or more of various hardware processing means such as a coprocessor, a microprocessor, a controller, a digital signal processor (DSP), a processing element with or without an accompanying DSP, or various other processing circuitry including integrated circuits such as, for example, an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit), an FPGA (field programmable gate array), a microcontroller unit (MCU), a hardware accelerator, a special-purpose computer chip, or the like. As such, in some embodiments, the processor may include one or more processing cores configured to perform independently. A multi-core processor may enable multiprocessing within a single physical package. Additionally or alternatively, the processor may include one or more processors configured in tandem via the bus to enable independent execution of instructions, pipelining and/or multithreading.
In an example embodiment, the processor 1522 may be configured to execute instructions stored in the memory device 1524 or otherwise accessible to the processor. Alternatively or additionally, the processor may be configured to execute hard coded functionality. As such, whether configured by hardware or software methods, or by a combination thereof, the processor may represent an entity (e.g., physically embodied in circuitry) capable of performing operations according to an embodiment of the present invention while configured accordingly. Thus, for example, when the processor is embodied as an ASIC, FPGA or the like, the processor may be specifically configured hardware for conducting the operations described herein. Alternatively, as another example, when the processor is embodied as an executor of software instructions, the instructions may specifically configure the processor to perform the algorithms and/or operations described herein when the instructions are executed. However, in some cases, the processor may be a processor of a specific device (e.g., a head mounted display) configured to employ an embodiment of the present invention by further configuration of the processor by instructions for performing the algorithms and/or operations described herein. The processor may include, among other things, a clock, an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) and logic gates configured to support operation of the processor. In one embodiment, the processor may also include user interface circuitry configured to control at least some functions of one or more elements of the user interface 1528.
Meanwhile, the communication interface 1526 may be any means such as a device or circuitry embodied in either hardware or a combination of hardware and software that is configured to receive and/or transmit data between the computing device 10 and a server 12. In this regard, the communication interface 1526 may include, for example, an antenna (or multiple antennas) and supporting hardware and/or software for enabling communications wirelessly. Additionally or alternatively, the communication interface may include the circuitry for interacting with the antenna(s) to cause transmission of signals via the antenna(s) or to handle receipt of signals received via the antenna(s). For example, the communications interface may be configured to communicate wirelessly with displays, such as via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth or other wireless communications techniques. In some instances, the communication interface may alternatively or also support wired communication. As such, for example, the communication interface may include a communication modem and/or other hardware/software for supporting communication via cable, digital subscriber line (DSL), universal serial bus (USB) or other mechanisms. For example, the communication interface may be configured to communicate via wired communication with other components of the computing device.
The user interface 1528 may be in communication with the processor 1522, such as the user interface circuitry, to receive an indication of a user input and/or to provide an audible, visual, mechanical, or other output to a user. As such, the user interface may include, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a joystick, a display, a touch screen display, a microphone, a speaker, and/or other input/output mechanisms. In some embodiments, a display may refer to display on a screen, on a wall, on glasses (e.g., near-eye-display), in the air, etc. The user interface may also be in communication with the memory 1524 and/or the communication interface 1526, such as via a bus.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these embodiments of the invention pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
Claims
1. A method for monitoring an individual, the method comprising:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models;
- comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models; and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising:
- determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the blink data is generated by one or more tags comprising an ultra-wideband (UWB) transmitter.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the UWB transmitter is configured to transmit a plurality of time of arrival (TOA) timing pulses.
5. The method according to claim 3, wherein the UWB transmitter is configured to transmit a tag data packet comprising 112 bits.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the tag derived data further comprises a tag UID and a tag-individual correlator.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the tag derived data further comprises tag data, a tag UID, a tag-sensor correlator, and a sensor information packet.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID and additional stored sensor data.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID, additional stored sensor data, a sensor-individual correlator, and environmental measurements.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner.
11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor derived data comprises position information read from a proximity label.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor derived data comprises associated sensor data generated by a sensor receiver upon receiving sensor information packets from first and second sensors.
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein at least part of the sensor derived data was transmitted from a location tag as part of a tag data packet.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one of an accelerometer, a diagnostic device, a triangulation positioner, or a proximity positioner.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the individual is a human being and the sensor derived data is generated from one or more sensors comprising at least one of a blood pressure sensor, a heart rate sensor, a body temperature sensor, an eye dilation sensor, a hydration sensor, a blood chemistry sensor, an ambient temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, or a barometric pressure sensor.
16. The method according to claim 1, wherein the individual is an animal and the sensor derived data is generated from one or more sensors comprising at least one of a blood pressure sensor, a heart rate sensor, a body temperature sensor, an eye dilation sensor, a hydration sensor, a blood chemistry sensor, an ambient temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, or a barometric pressure sensor.
17. The method according to claim 1, wherein the individual is a machine and the sensor derived data is generated from one or more sensor comprising at least one a throttle position sensor, brake position sensor, steering position sensor, axle, wheel or drive shaft sensor, rotary position sensor, crankshaft position sensor, engine coolant temperature sensor, water temperature sensor, oil temperature sensor, fuel gauge sensor, oil gauge sensor, suspension travel sensor, accelerometer, or pressure sensor.
18. The method according to claim 1, wherein the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
19. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data.
20. The method according to claim 2 further comprising:
- comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and determining whether the sensor-derived data satisfies the pre-defined thresholds.
21. The method according to claim 1, wherein the individual is a human being and the tag location data is indicative of a position of at least one of a head, shoulder, a torso, an elbow, a hand, a hip, a knee, and a foot.
22. The method according to claim 1, wherein the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
23. The method according to claim 22, wherein the tag location data is indicative of foot position of each of two feet for the individual, and wherein the method further comprises determining a gait based on the tag location data.
24. The method according to claim 22, wherein the individual is a human being and the tag location data is indicative of a position of one or more of: each of two hands, each of two feet, each of two knees, each of two hips, each of two elbows, and each of two shoulders.
25. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a representation of sound made by the individual.
26. The method according to claim 1, wherein comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on identity information.
27. The method according to claim 1, wherein comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on zone data.
28. The method according to claim 1, wherein comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on role data.
29. The method according to claim 1, wherein comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models comprises selecting a dynamics/kinetics model for comparing, and wherein the selecting the dynamics/kinetics model is based on identity information and role data.
30. A computer program product for monitoring an individual comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is generated based at least in part based on the blink data;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models;
- comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models; and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
31. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the computer-executable program code portions further comprise program code instructions for:
- determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
32. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the tag derived data is generated by a receiver configured to receive tag signals generated by an ultra-wideband (UWB) transmitter.
33. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one of an accelerometer, a diagnostic device, a triangulation positioner, or a proximity positioner.
34. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one of a blood pressure sensor, a heart rate sensor, a body temperature sensor, an eye dilation sensor, a hydration sensor, a blood chemistry sensor, an ambient temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, or a barometric pressure sensor.
35. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the sensor derived data comprises environmental measurements generated by one or more sensors comprising at least one a throttle position sensor, brake position sensor, steering position sensor, axle, wheel or drive shaft sensor, rotary position sensor, crankshaft position sensor, engine coolant temperature sensor, water temperature sensor, oil temperature sensor, fuel gauge sensor, oil gauge sensor, suspension travel sensor, accelerometer, or pressure sensor.
36. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
37. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data.
38. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the computer-executable program code portions further comprise program code instructions for
- comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generating an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold.
39. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the tag location data comprises location data for each of two or more tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
40. The computer program product according to claim 30, wherein the tag-derived data is indicative of a human being and the tag location data is indicative of a position of one or more of: each of two hands, each of two feet, each of two knees, each of two hips, each of two elbows, and each of two shoulders.
41. An apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for an individual;
- compare the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models;
- compare the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models; and
- determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
42. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the received tag derived data further comprises a tag UID and a tag-individual correlator.
43. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the received tag derived data further comprises tag data, a tag UID, a tag-sensor correlator, and a sensor information packet.
44. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID and additional stored sensor data.
45. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a sensor UID, additional stored sensor data, a sensor-individual correlator, and environmental measurements.
46. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner.
47. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the sensor derived data comprises position information read from a proximity label.
48. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation generated by a smartphone comprising a triangulation positioner.
49. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a position generated by a smartphone comprising a barcode imager.
50. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the sensor derived data comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, and wherein the sensor-derived data is determined, at least in part, based on DGPS correction data.
51. A method for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the method comprising:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
- comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models;
- and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
52. The method according to claim 51, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data.
53. The method according to claim 51, wherein the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator.
54. The method according to claim 51, wherein the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
55. The method according to claim 51, further comprising:
- determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
56. The method according to claim 51, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual.
57. The method according to claim 51, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated the individual.
58. The method according to claim 51, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual.
59. The method according to claim 51, wherein the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
60. A method for assessing the health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the method comprising:
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- comparing the sensor derived data to a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model; and
- determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
61. A method according to claim 60, further comprising:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data; and
- comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models;
- wherein the determination of the HFOP status for the individual is further based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
62. A method according to claim 60, wherein the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data.
63. The method according to claim 60 further comprising:
- comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generating an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold.
64. The method according to claim 60, wherein the one or more health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models with which the sensor derived data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual, an individual identity associated the individual, or zone data associated with the individual.
65. A computer program product for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
- comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models; and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
66. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data.
67. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator.
68. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
69. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
- determining whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value; and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
70. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least role information associated with the individual.
71. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated with the individual.
72. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual.
73. The computer program product according to claim 65, wherein the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
74. A computer program product for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, and performance level models; and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
75. The computer program product according to claim 74, wherein the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data.
76. The computer program product according to claim 74, wherein the computer-executable program code portions further comprise program code instructions for:
- comparing the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generating an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold.
77. The computer program product according to claim 74, wherein the one or more health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual, an individual identity associated the individual, or zone data associated with the individual.
78. An apparatus for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
- compare the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models; and
- determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models.
79. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data.
80. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the tag derived data further comprises a tag-individual correlator.
81. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the tag location data comprises tag location data for each of two or more location tags, each indicative of a position for a different part of the individual.
82. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- determine whether the HFOP status satisfies a threshold value and generating, in an instance in which the HFOP status does satisfy the threshold value, an alert.
83. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least role information associated with the individual.
84. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least an individual identity associated with the individual.
85. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the one or more individual dynamics/kinetics models with which the tag location data is compared is associated with at least zone data associated with the individual.
86. The apparatus according to claim 78, wherein the individual dynamics/kinetics models comprise location history data for the individual.
87. An apparatus for assessing the health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- compare the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models and performance level models; and
- determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
88. The apparatus according to claim 87, wherein the at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models comprise a respective one of a health history data, a fitness history data, an operation level history data, or a performance level history data.
89. The apparatus according to claim 87, wherein the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- compare the sensor derived data to pre-defined thresholds, and generate an alert in an instance in which particular sensor derived data satisfies an associated threshold.
90. The apparatus according to claim 87, wherein the one or more health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models with which the sensor derived data is compared is associated with at least one of role information associated with the individual, an individual identity associated the individual, or zone data associated with the individual.
91. A method for monitoring an individual associated with a radio frequency (RF) location tag, the method comprising:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- receiving a tag-individual correlator associated with the individual;
- receiving a tag-sensor correlator associated with the RF location tag; and
- matching the tag-sensor correlator with the tag-individual correlator to associate the sensor-derived data with the individual.
92. The method according to claim 91, wherein the tag-individual correlator is received from an individual database.
93. The method according to claim 91, wherein the tag-individual correlator is determined from the blink data.
94. The method according to claim 91, wherein the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the blink data.
95. A method for associating an environmental measurement with an individual, the method comprising:
- associating an individual location with the individual;
- receiving, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- associating a sensor location with the sensor; and
- determining a sensor-individual correlator based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
96. The method according to claim 95, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the individual; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the blink data.
97. The method according to claim 95, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising a position calculation, the position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position calculation.
98. The method according to claim 95, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising position information, the position information accessed from a proximity label; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position information.
99. The method according to claim 95, wherein associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the sensor; and
- determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based at least in part on the blink data.
100. The method according to claim 95, wherein associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) reference tag associated with the sensor, wherein said blink data includes a tag unique identification number;
- determining a location of the RF reference tag from a Geographical Information System based at least, in part, on the tag unique identification number; and
- determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based on the location of the RF reference tag.
101. The method according to claim 95, wherein the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position calculation.
102. The method according to claim 95, wherein the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises position information read from a proximity label, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position information.
103. The method according to claim 97, further comprising:
- receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based on the DGPS correction signal.
104. The method according to claim 101 further comprising:
- receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
105. The method according to claim 102 further comprising:
- receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
106. A method for associating an environmental measurement with an individual, the method comprising:
- associating an individual location with the individual;
- receiving, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- associating a sensor location with the sensor; and
- associating the sensor with the individual based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
107. The method according to claim 106, further comprising:
- associating a sensor information packet, derived from the sensor signal, with the individual.
108. A computer program product for monitoring an individual associated with a radio frequency (RF) location tag, comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data,
- wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- receiving a tag-individual correlator associated with the individual;
- receiving a tag-sensor correlator associated with the RF location tag; and
- matching the tag-sensor correlator with the tag-individual correlator to associate the sensor-derived data with the individual.
109. The computer program product according to claim 108, wherein the tag-individual correlator is received from an individual database.
110. The computer program product according to claim 108, wherein the tag-individual correlator is determined from the blink data.
111. The computer program product according to claim 108, wherein the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the blink data.
112. A computer program product for associating an environmental measurement with an individual comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- associating an individual location with the individual;
- receiving, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- associating a sensor location with the sensor; and
- determining a sensor-individual correlator based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
113. The computer program product according to claim 112, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the individual; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the blink data.
114. The computer program product according to claim 112, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising a position calculation, the position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position calculation.
115. The computer program product according to claim 112, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising position information, the position information accessed from a proximity label; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position information.
116. The computer program product according to claim 112, wherein associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the sensor; and
- determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based at least in part on the blink data.
117. The computer program product according to claim 112, wherein associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) reference tag associated with the sensor, wherein said blink data includes a tag unique identification number;
- determining a location of the RF reference tag from a Geographical Information System based at least, in part, on the tag unique identification number; and
- determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based on the location of the RF reference tag.
118. The computer program product according to claim 112, wherein the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position calculation.
119. The computer program product according to claim 112, wherein the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises position information read from a proximity label, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position information.
120. The computer program product according to claim 118 wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
- receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based on the DGPS correction signal.
121. The computer program product according to claim 118, wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
- receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
122. The computer program product according to claim 119, wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
- receiving a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determining the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
123. An apparatus for monitoring an individual associated with a radio frequency (RF) location tag, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data,
- wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- receive a tag-individual correlator associated with the individual;
- receive a tag-sensor correlator associated with the RF location tag; and
- match the tag-sensor correlator with the tag-individual correlator to associate the sensor-derived data with the individual.
124. The apparatus according to claim 123, wherein the tag-individual correlator is received from an individual database.
125. The apparatus according to claim 123, wherein the tag-individual correlator is determined from the blink data.
126. The apparatus according to claim 123, wherein the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the blink data.
127. The apparatus according to claim 123, wherein the tag-sensor correlator is determined from the sensor-derived data.
128. An apparatus for associating an environmental measurement with an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- associate an individual location with the individual;
- receive, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- associate a sensor location with the sensor; and
- determine a sensor-individual correlator based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
129. The apparatus according to claim 128, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the individual; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the blink data.
130. The apparatus according to claim 128, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising a position calculation, the position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position calculation.
131. The apparatus according to claim 128, wherein associating the individual location with the individual comprises:
- receiving, from a second sensor associated with the individual, a second sensor signal comprising position information, the position information accessed from a proximity label; and
- determining the individual location associated with the individual based at least in part on the position information.
132. The apparatus according to claim 128, wherein associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) location tag associated with the sensor; and
- determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based at least in part on the blink data.
133. The apparatus according to claim 128, wherein associating the sensor location with the sensor comprises:
- receiving a tag signal comprising blink data from a radio frequency (RF) reference tag associated with the sensor, wherein said blink data includes a tag unique identification number;
- determining a location of the RF reference tag from a Geographical Information System based at least, in part, on the tag unique identification number; and
- determining the sensor location associated with the sensor based on the location of the RF reference tag.
134. The apparatus according to claim 128, wherein the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises a position calculation determined by a triangulation positioner, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position calculation.
135. The apparatus according to claim 128, wherein the sensor signal received from the sensor further comprises position information read from a proximity label, wherein the sensor location associated with the sensor is determined at least in part on the position information.
136. The apparatus according to claim 134, wherein the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determine the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
137. The apparatus according to claim 135, wherein the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive a differential global positioning system (DGPS) correction signal; and
- determine the sensor location based on the DGPS correction signal.
138. An apparatus for associating an environmental measurement with an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- associate an individual location with the individual;
- receive, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising one or more environmental measurements indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- associate a sensor location with the sensor; and
- associate the sensor with an individual based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
139. An apparatus for associating an environmental measurement with an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- associate an individual location with the individual;
- receive, from a sensor, a sensor signal comprising a sensor information packet;
- associate a sensor location with the sensor; and
- associate the sensor information packet with the individual based on the individual location being within a threshold distance of the sensor location.
140. A method for assessing a health or fitness of an individual, the method comprising:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
- selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database;
- comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model; and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
141. The method according to claim 140, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least an individual identity.
142. The method according to claim 140, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a zone determined from the tag location data.
143. The method according to claim 140, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role.
144. The method according to claim 140, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
145. The method according to claim 140, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based at least partially on adversarial data.
146. The method according to claim 145,
- wherein the tag derived data comprises first blink data received from a first location tag associated with a first individual and second blink data received from a second location tag associated with a second individual, and
- wherein the adversarial data is based at least partially on comparing the first blink data to the second blink data.
147. The method according to claim 140, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
148. The method according to claim 140, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
149. The method according to claim 140, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending.
150. The method according to claim 140, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range.
151. The method according to claim 140, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
152. A method for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual in a monitored area, the method comprising:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least a zone associated with or determined from the tag location data;
- comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
153. The method according to claim 152, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least an individual identity.
154. The method according to claim 152, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role.
155. The method according to claim 152, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
156. A method for monitoring an individual, the method comprising:
- receiving tag derived data for each of two or more tags, the tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- determining, based on an individual role database, that the two or more tags are associated with individuals in an adversarial role; and
- determining adversarial data based on the tag location data.
157. The method according to claim 156, further comprising:
- selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data;
- comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
- and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual associated with the at least one tag based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
158. The method according to claim 156, further comprising:
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags;
- selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data;
- comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
159. The method according to claim 156, further comprising:
- selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data;
- comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags;
- selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data;
- comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models and based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
160. A computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
- selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database;
- comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model; and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
161. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least an individual identity.
162. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a zone determined from the tag location data.
163. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role.
164. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
165. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based at least partially on adversarial data.
166. The computer program product according to claim 165,
- wherein the tag derived data comprises first blink data received from a first location tag associated with a first individual and second blink data received from a second location tag associated with a second individual, and
- wherein the adversarial data is based at least partially on comparing the first blink data to the second blink data.
167. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
168. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
169. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending.
170. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range.
171. The computer program product according to claim 160, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
172. A computer program product for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual in a monitored area, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- receiving tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least a zone associated with or determined from the tag location data;
- comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
173. The computer program product according to claim 172, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least an individual identity.
174. The computer program product according to claim 172, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role.
175. The computer program product according to claim 172, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
176. A computer program product for monitoring an individual, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
- receiving tag derived data for each of two or more tags, the tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- determining, based on an individual role database, that the two or more tags are associated with individuals in an adversarial role;
- determining adversarial data based on the tag location data.
177. The computer program product according to claim 176, wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
- selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data;
- comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
- and
- determining a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual associated with the at least one tag based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
178. The computer program product according to claim 176, wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags;
- selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data;
- comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
179. The computer program product according to claim 176, wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
- selecting an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data;
- comparing the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
- receiving sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags;
- selecting a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data;
- comparing the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determining a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models and based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
180. An apparatus for assessing a health or fitness of an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data;
- select an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database;
- compare the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
- and
- determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
181. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least an individual identity.
182. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a zone determined from the tag location data.
183. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role.
184. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein selecting the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
185. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model is based at least partially on adversarial data.
186. The apparatus according to claim 185,
- wherein the tag derived data comprises first blink data received from a first location tag associated with a first individual and second blink data received from a second location tag associated with a second individual, and
- wherein the adversarial data is based at least partially on comparing the first blink data to the second blink data.
187. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises matching one or more field values of the tag location data to one or more corresponding field values of the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
188. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data has exceeded a control limit defined by the individual dynamics/kinetic model.
189. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that at least one field value of the tag location data is trending.
190. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises determining that the tag location data falls within a cluster range.
191. The apparatus according to claim 180, wherein comparing the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model comprises calculating the covariance of the tag location data with the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
192. An apparatus for assessing a health, fitness, operation, or performance of an individual in a monitored area, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for the individual;
- select a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least a zone associated with or determined from the tag location data;
- compare the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determine a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
193. The apparatus according to claim 192, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least an individual identity.
194. The apparatus according to claim 192, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role.
195. The apparatus according to claim 192, wherein selecting a HFOP model is based on at least a role and an individual identity.
196. An apparatus for monitoring an individual, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive tag derived data for each of two or more tags, the tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- determine, based on an individual role database, that the two or more tags are associated with individuals in an adversarial role; and
- determine adversarial data based on the tag location data.
197. The apparatus according to claim 196, wherein the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- select an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data;
- compare the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
- and
- determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual associated with the at least one tag based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
198. The apparatus according to claim 196, wherein the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags;
- select a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data;
- compare the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determine a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
199. The apparatus according to claim 196, wherein the computer code is further configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- select an individual dynamics/kinetics model from an individual dynamics/kinetics models database based on the adversarial data;
- compare the tag location data of at least one of the tags to the individual dynamics/kinetics model;
- receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for at least one individual associated with at least one of the tags;
- select a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) model based on at least the adversarial data;
- compare the sensor derived data to the HFOP model; and
- determine a HFOP status for the individual based on the comparison of the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models and based on the comparison of the tag location data to the individual dynamics/kinetics model.
200. A system for monitoring an individual, the system comprising:
- one or more tags; and
- apparatus comprising a processor and a memory having computer code stored therein, the computer code configured, when executed by the processor, to cause the apparatus to:
- receive tag derived data comprising tag location data and blink data, wherein the tag location data is determined based at least in part on the blink data;
- receive sensor derived data indicative of at least one of a health, a fitness, an operation level, or a performance level for an individual;
- compare the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models;
- compare the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models; and
- determine a health, fitness, operation and performance (HFOP) status for the individual based on the comparing the tag location data to individual dynamics/kinetics models and on the comparing the sensor derived data to at least one of health models, fitness models, operation level models, or performance level models.
201. The system according to claim 200, further comprising:
- one or more sensors.
Type: Application
Filed: Jul 15, 2013
Publication Date: Dec 11, 2014
Applicant: ZIH Corp. (Lincolnshire, IL)
Inventors: James J. O'Hagan (Lincolnshire, IL), Wolfgang Strobel (Lincoln, RI), Michael A. Wohl (Rogersville, TN)
Application Number: 13/942,139
International Classification: G06K 7/10 (20060101);
