GENERALIZED ASSORTED PIXEL CAMERA SYSTEMS AND METHODS
Generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods are provided. In accordance with some embodiments, the generalized assorted pixel camera systems include a color filter array, where the color filter array includes a plurality of primary filters and a plurality of secondary filters. Each filter has a particular spectral response and each filter is formed on a corresponding pixel of a plurality of pixels. Each of the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters enhances an attribute of image quality and the information obtained using the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters is used to balance spectral resolution, dynamic range, and spatial resolution for generating an image of a plurality of image types.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/736,333, filed May 11, 2011, which is the United States National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/US2009/038510, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/072,301, filed Mar. 28, 2008 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/194,725, filed Sep. 30, 2008. Each of the above-referenced patent applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
NOTICE CONCERNING COLOR DRAWINGSIt is noted that the patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawings will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
Nonetheless, because some readers will not have the color drawings available, the description will also endeavor to describe the drawings and the images they depict in a color-neutral manner, which may create apparent redundancies of description.
COPYRIGHT NOTICEA portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
TECHNICAL FIELDThe disclosed subject matter relates to generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods.
BACKGROUNDMost digital cameras and camcorders have a single image sensor, such as a charge coupled device (CCD) image sensor or a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor. These image sensors use a color filter array or mosaic, which is an assortment of different spectral filters, formed in front of the CCD or CMOS image sensor for color acquisition.
A commonly-used color filter array or mosaic is the Bayer mosaic shown in
In recent years, new image sensing technologies have emerged that use pixel assortments to enhance image sensing capabilities. For high dynamic range (HDR) imaging, a mosaic of neutral density filters with difference transmittances has been used. This approach to high sensitivity imaging builds upon the standard Bayer mosaic by using panchromatic pixels that collect a significantly larger proportion of incident radiation.
Despite these advances, the previously described mosaics and camera systems have limitations. For example, these mosaics and camera systems are used to generate one specific type of output image.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods that overcome these and other deficiencies of the prior art.
SUMMARYIn accordance with various embodiments, generalized assorted pixel camera mechanisms are provided. In some embodiments, generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods are provided that use a color filter array or mosaic with a rich assortment of color filters, such as the one shown in
In some embodiments, these mechanisms can provide an approach for determining the spatial and spectral layout of the color filter array, such as the one shown in
In some embodiments, these mechanisms can provide a demosaicing approach for reconstructing the variety of image types. For example, generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods are provided that include submicron pixels and anti-aliasing approaches for reconstructing under-sampled channels. In particular, information from particular filters is used to remove aliasing from the information captured by the remaining filters.
It should be noted that these mechanisms can be used in a variety of applications. For example, these mechanisms for enhancing spatial and spectral layout of a color filter array can be used in a generalized assorted pixel camera system. The camera system can capture a single image and, using the information from each of the filters in the color filter array, to balance or trade-off spectral resolution, dynamic range, and spatial resolution for generating images of multiple image types. These image types can include, for example, a monochrome image, a high dynamic range (HDR) monochrome image, a tri-chromatic (RGB) image, a HDR RGB image, and/or a multispectral image) from a single captured image.
In accordance with some embodiments, a color filter array is provided, the array comprising: a plurality of primary filters and a plurality of secondary filters, wherein each filter has a particular spectral response and each filter is formed on a corresponding pixel of a plurality of pixels; and wherein each of the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters enhances an attribute of image quality and wherein the information obtained using the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters is used to balance spatial resolution and image quality for generating an image of a plurality of image types.
In accordance with some embodiments, a method for generating images is provided, the method comprising: providing a color filter array, the color filter array comprising: a plurality of primary filters and a plurality of secondary filters, wherein each filter has a particular spectral response and each filter is formed on a corresponding pixel of a plurality of pixels; and wherein each of the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters enhances an attribute of image quality and wherein the information obtained using the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters is used to balance spatial resolution and image quality for generating an image of a plurality of image types; capturing an image using the color filter array, wherein information from the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters corresponding to the image is obtained; and generating the image in a plurality of image types using the information from the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters.
In accordance with some embodiments, a camera system is provided, the system comprising: a color filter array, the color filter array comprising: a plurality of primary filters and a plurality of secondary filters, wherein each filter has a particular spectral response and each filter is formed on a corresponding pixel of a plurality of pixels; and wherein each of the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters enhances an attribute of image quality and wherein the information obtained using the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters is used to balance spatial resolution and image quality for generating an image of a plurality of image types.
In some embodiments, an image processing system is provided, the system comprising: a processor that is configured to: receive information corresponding to an image from a color filter array, wherein the color filter array includes a plurality of primary filters and a plurality of secondary filters, wherein each filter has a particular spectral response and each filter is formed on a corresponding pixel of a plurality of pixels and wherein each of the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters enhances an attribute of image quality and wherein the information obtained using the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters is used to balance spatial resolution and image quality for generating an image of a plurality of image types; and generate the image in a plurality of image types using the information from the plurality of primary filters and the plurality of secondary filters.
In accordance with various embodiments, generalized assorted pixel camera mechanisms are provided. In some embodiments, generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods are provided that use a color filter array or mosaic with a rich assortment of color filters, such as the one shown in
In some embodiments, these mechanisms can provide an approach for determining the spatial and spectral layout of the color filter array, such as the one shown in
In some embodiments, these mechanisms can provide a demosaicing approach for reconstructing the variety of image types. For example, generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods are provided that include submicron pixels and anti-aliasing approaches for reconstructing under-sampled channels. In particular, information from particular filters is used to remove aliasing from the information captured by the remaining filters.
It should be noted that these mechanisms can be used in a variety of applications. For example, these mechanisms for enhancing spatial and spectral layout of a color filter array can be used in a generalized assorted pixel camera system. The camera system can capture a single image and, using the information from each of the filters in the color filter array, balance or trade-off spectral resolution, dynamic range, and spatial resolution for generating images of multiple image types. These image types can include, for example, a monochrome image, a high dynamic range (HDR) monochrome image, a tri-chromatic (RGB) image, a HDR RGB image, and/or a multispectral image) from a single captured image.
In some embodiments, generalized assorted pixel camera mechanisms with an image sensor having submicron pixels are provided. Generally speaking, it has been determined that the resolution performance of an imaging sensor with submicron pixels exceeds the optical resolution limit.
To fabricate such a camera system, it should be noted that the resolution of an optical imaging system can be limited by multiple factors, such as diffraction and aberration. While aberrations can be corrected during lens design, diffraction is a limitation that cannot be avoided. The two-dimensional diffraction pattern of a lens with a circular aperture is generally referred to as the Airy disk, where the width of the Airy disk determines the maximum resolution limit of the system. This is generally defined as:
I(θ)=I0{2J1(z)/z}2,
where I0 is the intensity in the center of the Airy diffraction pattern, J1 is the Bessel function of the first kind of order one, and θ is the angle of observation (i.e., the angle between the axis of the circular aperture and the line between the aperture center and observation point). It should be noted that z=πq/λN, where q is the radial distance from the optical axis in the observation plane, λ is the wavelength of the incident light, and N is the f-number of the system. In the case of an ideal lens, this diffraction pattern is the Point Spread Function (PSF) for an in-focus image and the Fourier transformation of the PSF is used to characterize the resolution of an optical imaging system. This quantity is generally referred to as the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). The MTF of such an imaging system can be calculated directly from the wavelength λ of incident light and the f-number N. This is denoted by MTFopt (λ, N)=F(I(θ)), where F(•) denotes the Fourier transformation.
It should be noted that pixels generally have a rectangular shape and their finite size contributes to the resolution characteristics of the imaging system. The Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) of an image sensor can be approximated as the Fourier transformation of a rectangular function, which is described by MTFsensor(p)=F(s(t)). The rectangular function s(t) can be expressed as:
where p is the pixel size and ζ is an aperture ratio, which is generally assumed to be 1 due to the use of on-chip microlenses.
It should also be noted that the total fundamental optical resolution limit of a camera system (e.g., including the lens and the sensor) can be described in the frequency domain as MTF=MTFopt (λ, N)·MTFsensor(p). To calculate this, the values of λ=555 nm (which generally corresponds to the peak of the sensitivity of the human eye) and N=f/5.6 (which is a pupil size generally used in, for example, consumer photography) are used. With these values, the fundamental MTF is determined by pixel size p.
The MTF for various pixel sizes is shown in
In some embodiments, generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods are provided that use a color filter array or mosaic with a rich assortment of color filters. Again, as shown in
The pixels marked a, b, and c in color filter array 400 (collectively referred to herein as “primary filters”) capture three different spectral images on a rectangular grid with sampling pitch Δsa,b,c=2p. Accordingly, the Nyquist frequency for a, b, and c is fna,b,c=fSa,b,c/2=fs/4. It should be noted that, due to diffraction, filters a, b, and c do not cause aliasing because the optical resolution limit is one-quarter of the sampling frequency fs. These aliasing-free pixels a, b, and c can be used to reconstruct high resolution images, such as high resolution monochrome images and high resolution RGB images.
The pixels marked d, e, f, and g in color filter array 400 (collectively referred to as “secondary filters”) each sample the incident image on rectangular grids through different spectral filters. The sampling pitch for each of the secondary filters is Δsd,e,f,g=4p and the Nyquist frequency is fnd,e,f,g=fsd,e,f,g/2=fs/8.
To further illustrate the Nyquist frequencies of color filter array 400, the Nyquist or usable frequency region 500 is shown in
In addition,
Using color filter array 400, a plurality of image characteristics can be captured simultaneously. It should be noted, however, that there may be a trade-off in the fidelity of each characteristic. For example, monochrome and standard RGB images are reconstructed at high resolution using the primary filters of color filter array 400. For high dynamic range (HDR) images, the spectral resolution is improved by using the secondary filters and decreasing the spatial resolution.
In another example, high spatial resolution can be obtained by sacrificing the dynamic range and the spectrum. That is, a monochrome image has high spatial resolution. By sacrificing the spatial resolution, quality of the spectrum is improved. By further sacrifice of the resolution, dynamic range is expanded in addition to the improvement of the spectrum.
In some embodiments, a cost or error function can be used to enhance the filter spectra for the primary and secondary filters. The cost function can incorporates several terms, such as the quality of color reproduction (e.g., for a RGB image), reconstruction of reflectance (e.g., for a multispectral image), and dynamic range (e.g., for a HDR image).
The value xm measured at a pixel in the mth channel, where m is one of the primary or secondary filters a, b, c, d, e, f, or g, is given by the following equation:
xm=∫λ
where i(λ) is the spectral power distribution of the illumination, r(λ) is the spectral reflectance of the scene point, and cm(λ) is the spectral response of the camera's mth color channel. When the wavelength λ is sampled at equally-spaced L points, xm can be described by the following discrete expression:
Moreover, if the above-mentioned equation is rewritten in matrix form, it can be described as X=CTIR, where X=[xa, xb, . . . xg]T, C=[cm(λl)], I is a diagonal matrix made up of the discrete illumination samples i(λl), and R=[r(λl)].
In some embodiments, the color reproduction error corresponding to the primary and secondary filters can be determined. For example, to obtain HDR RGB images, a high exposure RGB image can be reconstructed using the primary filters of color filter array 400 and a lower exposure image can be reconstructed using the secondary filters of color filter array 400. In some embodiments, the spectral responses of the primary and secondary filters are to yield the highest color reproduction. It should be noted that a variety of color rating indicies can be used to evaluate the color reproduction characteristics of a filter and these indicies can use a cost function that minimizes the difference in the color between the measured color of a reference material and its known color.
In some embodiments, to calculate the difference of color, the CIE 1931 XYZ color space (created by the International Commission on Illumination), which is based on direct measurements of human visual perception and serves as the basis of which many other color spaces are defined, can be used. The calculation of sRGB tristimulus values (which are employed in some digital cameras or color monitors) from the CIE XYZ tristimulus values is a linear transformation. The CIE XYZ tristimulus values can be defined as Y=ATIR, where Y represents the true tristimulus values and A is a matrix of CIE XYZ color matching functions [
It should be noted that the average magnitude of color difference between the true color Y and the estimate Ŷ over a set of N real-world objects can be used as a metric to quantify the camera system's color reproduction performance. The color reproduction errors corresponding to the primary and secondary filters can then be described by the following equations:
In some embodiments, the error introduced by the reconstruction of the spectral distribution can be determined. For example, the spectral distribution can be reconstructed using a linear model. Since the model is linear, the reconstruction is efficient and stable. The linear model for the reconstruction can be expressed as the set of orthogonal spectral basis functions bk(λ):
r(λ)=Σk=1Kσkbk(λ),
where σk are scalar coefficients and K is the number of basis functions. By substituting the above-described equation into the cost function, the cost or error function can be described by the following equation:
These equations can be written as X=F·σ, where F is a M×K matrix: F=∫λ
where σn represents the actual coefficients of the nth object and {circumflex over (σ)}n are the reconstructed coefficients. It should be noted that, in some embodiments, the number of basis functions K is 8 and the smoothness parameter α is set to 64.0.
In some embodiments, the cost function can include an approach for balancing the extension of dynamic range with signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio. As described previously, to achieve HDR imaging, secondary filters (e.g., filters d, e, f, and g of color filter array 400) have lower transmittances than the primary filters (e.g., filters a, b, and c of color filter array 400). This can cause deterioration of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the secondary filters. Such a trade-off can be controlled based on the ratio of the exposures of the primary and secondary filters: β=emax/emin, where emax is the average exposure of the primary filters and emin is the average exposure of the secondary filters. Accordingly, β can be determined by C from the previously-mentioned equation X=CTIR, where the determined value of β can be used to valance the extension of dynamic range versus the reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio.
In some embodiments, dynamic range can be defined as: DR=20 log10Bfull/Nr, where Vfull represents the full-well capacity of the detector (e.g., Vfull=3500e−) and Nr is the root mean square (RMS) of the read-noise of the image sensor. The RMS of the read-noise of the detector can be defined as Nr=√{square root over (Nshot2+Ndark2)}. For example, Ndark can be set to 33e−. In some embodiments that use the color filter array 400 of
In some embodiments, the signal-to-noise ration can be defined as: SNR=20 log10V/N, where V is the signal and N is the noise. The signal corresponding to a secondary filter can be express using the exposure β as V″max=V′max/β, where V′max is a signal due to a primary filter. When the signal due to the primary filter is not saturated, the signal due to the secondary filter can be determined from the primary signal. The signal-to-noise ratio for a secondary filter when the primary signal is saturated is the worst-case signal-to-noise ratio for a camera system using mosaic 400:
where Nmax=√{square root over (N″shot2+Ndark2)} and N″shot=√{square root over (Vfull/β)}.
Because the camera system has a high performance in signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range when SNRGAP and DRGAP are large, the following cost function can be used:
In some embodiments, each of the above-mentioned cost functions can be combined to provide a total cost function. For example, since each of the above-mentioned cost functions represent a particular dimension of image quality, the total cost function can be expressed as a weighted sum of the individual costs:
G=w1{E′+E″}+w2R+w3D
It should be noted that the weights (e.g., w1, w2, and w3) can be determined according to the image quality requirements of the application for which the camera system is used or manufactured. For example, in some embodiments, w1=1.0, w2=1.0, and w3=1.0 can be used for determining the total cost function. It should also be noted that, since the filters have positive spectral responses (C is to be positive), the enhancement or optimization of C can be expressed as:
In some embodiments, initial guesses can be assigned to the filter spectral responses. That is, to find the seven spectral response functions in C, initial guesses can be used along with an optimization approach. In one example, the initial guesses for the filter responses can be selected from a set of commercially available optical band pass filters and on-chip filters. In another example, commercial filters can be assigned to each of the seven channels based on one or more of the above-mentioned cost functions (e.g., assigning from a set of 177 commercial filters based on color reproduction error). Accordingly, the primary filters C′0 and secondary filters C″0 are determined such that:
where C0 is the set of commercial filters.
In response to assigning seven initial guesses to each of the seven filters, an iterative application can be used to perform a constrained non-linear minimization of
For example, Mathworks® Matlab® or any other suitable computing program can be used to determine the spectral responses. Using Matlab®, the FMINCON routine can be used to find a minimum of a constrained non-linear multivariable function as described above. However, any other suitable computer program can be used to find the minimum of a constrained non-linear multivariate function.
In addition, the spectra captured by the secondary filters d, e, f, and g (represented by curves 620, 625, 630, and 635, respectively), irrespective of their spectral responses, are to be highly correlated with the images obtained using the primary filters. Consequently, anti-aliasing of images produced by secondary filters can be performed. Furthermore, due to the characteristics of the cost function, the secondary filters have lower exposures or transmittances than primary filters. Accordingly, using the primary and secondary filters, high dynamic range information can be obtained and, since the seven filters have different spectra and sample the visible spectrum, their reconstructed images can be used to obtain smooth estimates of the complete spectral distribution of each scene point i.e., a multispectral image.
As shown in Table 1 below, the errors in the color reproduction and spectral reconstruction components of the total cost function, the estimated dynamic range, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the initial and enhanced set of seven filters of color filter array 400. In addition, Table 1 also illustrates the errors in the color reproduction and spectral reconstruction components of the total cost function, the estimated dynamic range, and the signal-to-noise ratio for the red, green, and blue filters in a Bayer mosaic.
It should be noted that, in response to enhancing the spectral responses of the filters in the generalized assorted pixel color filter array using a cost function, each of the errors in Table 1 have been reduced. It should also be noted that the deterioration of the signal-to-noise ratio is kept low at about 2.3 dB, while the dynamic range is improved by about 4.6 dB. It should further be noted that the errors in color reproduction and spectral reconstruction components of the total cost function are higher with the Bayer mosaic.
As shown in
As also shown in
Referring back to the color filter array 400 of
Denoting Λm as the set of pixel locations, (i, j), for channel mε{a, b, c, d, e, f, g, a mask function for each filter can be defined as:
In the color filter array 400 of
where xm is the mth channel's full resolution image.
Referring back to
Monochrome image 720 of a high resolution can be reconstructed using information measured by primary filters. This can be expressed as:
IM(i,j)={{circumflex over (x)}a(i,j)+{circumflex over (x)}b(i,j)+{circumflex over (x)}c(i,j)}/3
where {circumflex over (x)}a(i,j), {circumflex over (x)}b(i,j), {circumflex over (x)}c(i,j) are the full resolution images obtained by interpolating pixels with the primary filters (e.g., primary filters a, b, and c of
{circumflex over (x)}v(i,j)=Wv(i,j)y(i,j)+
where v=a, b, or c, * denotes convolution, and
In some embodiments, high dynamic range monochrome image 730 can be generated from a single captured image by using information obtained from primary filters 712 and secondary filters 714. To create a high dynamic range monochrome image (e.g., image 730), a low exposure monochrome image 732 can be constructed. At 734, low exposure monochrome image 732 is constructed using information from secondary filters 714 (e.g., the four secondary filters d, e, f, and g of
For example, the monochrome values at pixels with filter a (e.g., filter a of color filter array 400 shown in
It should be noted that aliasing caused by half-pixel phase shifts cancel out when adding four pixels in a diagonal neighborhood. The values at pixel a are then interpolated to the other pixels to yield the low exposure monochrome image 732 (ILEM), which can be expressed as:
ILEM(i,j)=L(i,j)+Ws{QD*L(i,j)}+Wb{QH*L(i,j)}+Wc{QV*L(i,j)}
where:
After obtaining low exposure monochrome image 732, at 736, a high dynamic range monochrome image 730 can be generated by combining the monochrome images of different exposures and their associated information e.g., the monochrome image 720 generated using primary filters 712 and the low exposure monochrome image 732 generated using secondary filters 714.
In some embodiments, tri-chromatic (RGB) image 740 can be generated from a single captured image by using information obtained from primary filters 712. As described previously in
IRGB(i,j)=HT′[{circumflex over (x)}a(i,j){circumflex over (x)}b(i,j){circumflex over (x)}c(i,j)]T
As described previously, to calculate the difference of color for color reproduction of a RGB image, the CIE 1931 XYZ color space (created by the International Commission on Illumination), which is based on direct measurements of human visual perception and serves as the basis of which many other color spaces are defined, can be used. The calculation of sRGB tristimulus values (which are employed in some digital cameras or color monitors) from the CIE XYZ tristimulus values is a linear transformation. The CIE XYZ tristimulus values can be defined as Y=ATIR, where Y represents the true tristimulus values and A is a matrix of CIE XYZ color matching functions [
In some embodiments, a HDR RGB image 760 can be generated from a single captured image by using information obtained from primary filters 712 and secondary filters 714 of color filter array 710. To create a high dynamic range tri-chromatic image (e.g., image 760), a low exposure tri-chromatic image 750 can be constructed.
Full resolution secondary filter images—{circumflex over (x)}d, {circumflex over (x)}e, {circumflex over (x)}f, and {circumflex over (x)}g—can be respectively computed using the d, e, f, and g pixels using bilinear interpolation. However, this can result in severe aliasing. In some embodiments, the aliasing of the secondary filter images can be estimated using information from the primary filter images—{circumflex over (x)}a, {circumflex over (x)}b, {circumflex over (x)}c at 752. It should be noted that there is a strong correlation between the spectra of primary filters 712 and secondary filters 714, as shown by the overlap in
Ω{We(i,j){circumflex over (x)}a(i,j)}
where Ω(•) represents bilinear interpolation. Aliasing can be inferred by subtracting the original {circumflex over (x)}a image from the interpolated one. Then, to obtain the final estimate of aliasing in channel e, the above-mentioned difference can be scaled by Ψae, which is the ratio of the filter transmittances of the a and e pixels, to take into account the difference in exposures of a and e pixels. The estimated aliasing Ψae can be expressed as follows:
γe(i,j)=[Ω{We(i,j){circumflex over (x)}a(i,j)}−{circumflex over (x)}a(i,j)]ψae
where:
Accordingly, the anti-aliased image {circumflex over (x)}e can be calculated at 754 as:
{circumflex over (x)}e(i,j)=Ω{We(i,j)y(i,j)}|γe(i,j)
In addition, other anti-aliased secondary can be similar calculated.
A low exposure RGB image can be obtained by multiplying the secondary filter images by a color reproduction matrix at 756, which can be expressed as:
ILERGB(i,j)=HT″[{circumflex over (x)}d(i,j){circumflex over (x)}e(i,j){circumflex over (x)}f(i,j){circumflex over (x)}g(i,j)]T
where T″ is the color reproduction matrix and H is the linear transformation from CIE XYZ to sRGB.
After obtaining low exposure RGB 750, at 758, a high dynamic range RGB image 760 can be generated by combining the tri-chromatic (RGB) images of different exposures and their associated information e.g., the RGB image 740 and the low exposure RGB image 750.
In some embodiments, a multispectral image 770 can be generated from a single captured image using information from primary filters 712 and secondary filters 714 of color filter array 710. For multispectral image 770, the spectral reflectance of an object can be reconstructed using images {circumflex over (x)}a, {circumflex over (x)}b, {circumflex over (x)}c and anti-aliased images {circumflex over (x)}d, {circumflex over (x)}e, {circumflex over (x)}f, and {circumflex over (x)}g at 772. In some embodiments, a HDR RGB image 760 can be generated from a single captured image by using information obtained from primary filters 712 and secondary filters 714 of color filter array 710.
As described previously, the spectral distribution is reconstructed by minimizing the expression: ∥F·σ−X∥2. In some embodiments, the reconstruction approach can be expressed as a constrained minimization as follows: {circumflex over (σ)}=arg min∥{tilde over (F)}·σ−{tilde over (X)}∥2, subject to B·σ≧0, where {tilde over (F)}=[FTαPT]T, Plk=∂2bk(λl)/∂λ2 is a smoothness constraint, a is a smoothness parameter, 1≧L, 1≧k≧K, {tilde over (X)}=[XT 0]T, and B=[bk(λ1)]. This regularized minimization can be solved using quadratic programming.
Additional examples of images generated from a single captured image are shown in
It should be noted that the texture and color of saturated regions in the monochrome and RGB images become visible in the corresponding high dynamic range images. As also shown in
In addition,
Alternatively, some camera systems can use a different generalized assorted pixel color filter array to capture a single image of a scene and control the trade-off between image resolution, dynamic range, and spectral detail to generate images of multiple image types.
For example,
As shown in
To further illustrate the Nyquist frequencies of color filter array 1300 of
In another example of a color filter array in accordance with some embodiments of the disclosed subject matter,
As shown in
The Nyquist frequencies of color filter array 1500 are further illustrated in
Similarly, as described above, multiple image types can be generated from a single captured image using a camera system with a color filter array, such as color filter array 1300 of
In some embodiments, using one of color filter arrays 1300 or 1500, a linear regression model of local color distribution can be used to reduce aliasing effects. For example, it has been determined that there are strong inter-color correlations at small local areas (e.g., on a color-changing edge). These local color distributions in an image can be expressed by the following linear regression model:
It should be noted that a pixel at location (i,j) in color filters arrays 1300 or 1500 can be represented by either (Ri,j, gi,j, bi,j, yi,j, ei,j), (ri,j, Gi,j, bi,j, yi,j, ei,j), (ri,j, gi,j, Bi,j, yi,j, ei,j), (ri,j, gi,j, bi,j, Yi,j, ei,j), or (ri,j, gi,j, bi,j, yi,j, Ei,j), where Ri,j, Bi,j, Yi,j, and Ei,j denote the known red, green, blue, yellow, and emerald components of the color filter array and ri,j, gi,j, bi,j, yi,j, ei,j denote the unknown components of the color filter array. In addition, it should also be noted that the estimates of ri,j, gi,j, bi,j, yi,j, ei,j are denoted as {circumflex over (R)}i,j, Ĝi,j, {circumflex over (B)}i,j, Ŷi,j, and Êi,j.
The resulting Fourier transforms of VGR and MR are as follows:
Using these expressions, the aliasing of R can be estimated.
In some embodiments, using one of color filter arrays 1300 or 1500, directional smoothing can be used to reduce aliasing effects. For example, to reduce the computational cost of anti-aliasing, directional smoothing can be used when the local statistics (e.g., VGG, VGR, MG, and MR) are calculated. As shown in
It should be noted that the directional smoothing approach can be applied in any suitable direction. For example, the smoothing approach can be applied in the horizontal, vertical, right-ascending diagonal (), and right-descending diagonal direction (). It should also be noted that the direction of smoothing can be selected based at least in part on the direction of the local texture (e.g., horizontal smoothing for horizontal stripes).
In some embodiments, the directional smoothing approach for several directions (e.g., horizontal, vertical, right-ascending diagonal, and right-descending diagonal direction) is performed and anti-aliasing, computing local statistics, and output color interpolations are also performed for each direction. By measuring magnitudes of the gradient and local color variance of the anti-aliased one-dimensional signals, residual aliasing for each direction can be evaluated. In some embodiments, the direction that provides the smallest residual aliasing can be selected as the suitable direction of the interpolation filter.
In some embodiments, hardware used in connection with the camera mechanisms can include an image processor, an image capture device (that includes a generalized assorted pixel color filter array, such as the one in
Accordingly, generalized assorted pixel camera systems and methods are provided.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated in the foregoing illustrative embodiments, it is understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of implementation of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is only limited by the claims which follow. Features of the disclosed embodiments can be combined and rearranged in various ways.
Claims
1. A color filter array, comprising:
- a plurality of first color filters each having a first spectral response;
- a plurality of second color filters each having a second spectral response that is different from the first spectral response;
- a plurality of third color filters each having a third spectral response that is different from the first spectral response and different from the second spectral response; and
- a plurality of fourth color filters each having a spectral response that is highly correlated with at least a portion of the first spectral response, the second spectral response or the third spectral response, wherein the plurality of fourth filters includes at least four filters that each have a different spectral response;
- wherein each of the plurality of first color filters are arranged such that the first color filter is adjacent to a second color filter and a third color filter,
- each of the plurality of second color filters are arranged such that the second color filter is adjacent to two first color filters and a fourth color filter,
- each of the plurality of third color filters are arranged such that the third color filter is adjacent to two first color filters and a fourth color filter, and
- each of the plurality of fourth color filters is arranged such that the fourth color filter is adjacent to two second color filters and two third color filters, and spaced apart from another fourth color filter having the same spectral response by at least three color filters along two orthogonal directions of the color filter array.
2. The color filter array of claim 1, wherein the transmittance of each fourth filter is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of first color filters, the plurality of second filters or the plurality of third color filters that has a spectral response that is highly correlated with that fourth filter.
3. The color filter array of claim 1, wherein the transmittance of each fourth filter is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of first color filters, the transmittance of the plurality of second color filters, and the transmittance of the plurality of third color filters.
4. The color filter array of claim 1, wherein the plurality of first color filters are blue filters, the plurality of second color filters are green filters, and the plurality of third color filters are red color filters.
5. The color filter array of claim 4, wherein the plurality of fourth color filters comprise:
- a plurality of fifth color filters having a fourth spectral response that is highly correlated with at least a portion of the first spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of first color filters;
- a plurality of sixth color filters having a fifth spectral response that is highly correlated with a portion of the second spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of second color filters;
- a plurality of seventh filters having a sixth spectral response that is highly correlated with a portion of the second spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of second color filters, wherein a wavelength at which the sixth spectral response has peak transmittance is substantially different a wavelength at which the fifth spectral response has peak transmittance; and
- a plurality of eighth color filters having an eighth spectral response that is highly correlated with at least a portion of the third spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the third color filters.
6. A camera system, comprising:
- a color filter array, comprising: a plurality of first color filters each having a first spectral response; a plurality of second color filters each having a second spectral response that is different from the first spectral response; a plurality of third color filters each having a third spectral response that is different from the first spectral response and different from the second spectral response; and a plurality of fourth color filters each having a spectral response that is highly correlated with at least a portion of the first spectral response, the second spectral response or the third spectral response, wherein the plurality of fourth filters includes at least four filters that each have a different spectral response; wherein each of the plurality of first color filters are arranged such that the first color filter is adjacent to a second color filter and a third color filter, each of the plurality of second color filters are arranged such that the second color filter is adjacent to two first color filters and a fourth color filter, each of the plurality of third color filters are arranged such that the third color filter is adjacent to two first color filters and a fourth color filter, and each of the plurality of fourth color filters is arranged such that the fourth color filter is adjacent to two second color filters and two third color filters, and spaced apart from another fourth color filter having the same spectral response by at least three color filters along two orthogonal directions of the color filter array; and
- an image sensor comprising a plurality of pixels, wherein the color filter array is disposed in the camera system such that, during operation of the camera system, each color filter of the color filter array corresponds to a pixel of the plurality of pixels.
7. The camera system of claim 6, wherein the transmittance of each fourth filter is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of first color filters, the plurality of second filters or the plurality of third color filters that has a spectral response that is highly correlated with that fourth filter.
8. The camera system of claim 6, wherein the transmittance of each fourth filter is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of first color filters, the transmittance of the plurality of second color filters, and the transmittance of the plurality of third color filters.
9. The camera system of claim 8, wherein the plurality of first color filters are blue filters, the plurality of second color filters are green filters, and the plurality of third color filters are red color filters.
10. The camera system of claim 9, wherein the plurality of fourth color filters comprise:
- a plurality of fifth color filters having a fourth spectral response that is highly correlated with at least a portion of the first spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of first color filters;
- a plurality of sixth color filters having a fifth spectral response that is highly correlated with a portion of the second spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of second color filters;
- a plurality of seventh filters having a sixth spectral response that is highly correlated with a portion of the second spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the plurality of second color filters, wherein a wavelength at which the sixth spectral response has peak transmittance is substantially different a wavelength at which the fifth spectral response has peak transmittance; and
- a plurality of eighth color filters having an eighth spectral response that is highly correlated with at least a portion of the third spectral response and having a transmittance that is lower than the transmittance of the third color filters.
11. The camera system of claim 6, further comprising a processor that is configured to generate a plurality of images based on image data captured by the image sensor during a single exposure, wherein each of the plurality of images is of a different image type of a plurality of image types that includes at least two of: a monochrome image, a high dynamic resolution monochrome image, a tri-chromatic image, a high dynamic resolution tri-chromatic image, and a multispectral image.
12. The camera system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to generate a monochrome image using primarily information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of first color filters, the plurality of second color filters, and the plurality of third color filters.
13. The camera system of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to generate a low exposure monochrome image using primarily information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of fourth color filters.
14. The camera system of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to generate a high dynamic range image by combining information from the low exposure monochrome image and the monochrome image.
15. The camera system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to generate a tri-chromatic image using primarily information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of first color filters, the plurality of second color filters, and the plurality of third color filters.
16. The camera system of claim 15, wherein the processor is further configured to generate the tri-chromatic image using a color reproduction matrix and a linear transformation to combine the information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of first color filters, the plurality of second color filters, and the plurality of third color filters.
17. The camera system of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to:
- generate a low exposure tri-chromatic image using primarily information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of fourth color filters; and
- generate a high dynamic range tri-chromatic image by combining information from the low exposure tri-chromatic image and information from the tri-chromatic image.
18. The camera system of claim 17, wherein the processor is further configured to generate the low exposure tri-chromatic image by estimating aliasing of the information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of fourth color filters using the information obtained from pixels corresponding to the plurality of first color filters, the plurality of second color filters, and the plurality of third color filters.
19. The camera system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured to:
- generate anti-aliased information by performing anti-aliasing on the information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of fourth colored filters; and
- generate a multispectral image using the anti-aliased information and information obtained using pixels corresponding to the plurality of first color filters, the plurality of second color filters and the plurality of third color filters to reconstruct spectral reflectance for the multispectral image.
Type: Application
Filed: Nov 18, 2014
Publication Date: Mar 12, 2015
Inventors: Shree K. Nayar (New York, NY), Fumihito Yasuma (Tokyo), Tomoo Mitsunaga (Kawasaki)
Application Number: 14/546,627
International Classification: H04N 5/238 (20060101); H04N 9/64 (20060101);