SOLAR THERMAL COLLECTOR SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FLAT ROOF CONSTRUCTIONS

Abstract

Disclosed herein is a solar thermal collector system that is particularly configured for installation on a flat roof of a building. In accordance with aspects of a particular embodiment of the invention, the solar thermal collector system includes a solar thermal collector module having a glazing sheet at a top, exterior surface, and an absorber sheet within the module positioned below and spaced apart from the glazing sheet. At least the absorber sheet is fluidly connected to a fluid handling system, and carries a working fluid that is heated in the module by the sun and transfers such heat to equipment connected to the module by the fluid handling system. The module is preferably provided a thermally actuated valve that allows the working fluid to also flow through the glazing sheet, which results in self-regulation of the temperature of the module below a critical design temperature.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is based upon and claims benefit of copending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/928,111 entitled “Systems and Methods for Solar Heating and Cooling of Buildings,” filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 16, 2014 by the inventor herein, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to radiant energy management, and more particularly to a solar thermal collector system configured for use on buildings having a flat roof construction.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Skylight systems have previously been provided that are capable of providing the majority of the lighting needs for various flat roof commercial buildings. In such systems, the skylight may convert the excess solar energy that is not needed for illumination into thermal energy that can be used for process hot water, space heating, and solar cooling. Solar cooling apparatus, such as absorption chillers and liquid desiccant dehumidifiers, typically require between 1.3 and 1.7 units of thermal energy to provide one unit of cooling to the building. An economically designed energy managing skylight system may employ skylights that cover only about 5 to 6% of the roof area. Even at relatively high thermal efficiencies, this only provides about one fourth of the thermal energy needed to cool the entire building area below the skylights.

In order to serve the entire building, and to make the best use of the roof as an energy resource, it is preferable to provide supplemental thermal energy in addition to what is generated by such energy managing skylights. It is possible to supplement the thermal energy using conventional solar thermal collectors. However, the cost of installation per unit of thermal energy generated by conventional thermal collectors is much higher than that generated by previously presented energy managing skylights, and the overall project economics can be significantly degraded. Another option is to use a fossil fuel such as natural gas as the supplemental heat source. This has the advantage of providing firm capacity during periods of low sunlight, but the expense of the gas backup degrades the project economics and the additional fossil fuel use works against one of the main product objectives of being a primary renewable energy source. Thus, there is an ongoing need for a lower-cost method of generating thermal energy at a sufficient temperature to drive solar cooling equipment that is optimized for the commercial rooftop and seasonal summer operation.

Another factor in the design of a solar collector for large commercial buildings is the potential use of the solar collector as a cooling device. In climates with high solar radiation during the day and relatively low humidity at night, a significant amount of building cooling can be achieved by using night sky radiant cooling techniques. One problem with night sky radiant cooling is that the typical cooling heat fluxes are only about 1/10 those which can be achieved during solar collection of sunlight. That is, the night sky radiant cooler rejecting heat at 80° F. into a clear night sky can radiate only a maximum of about 80 W per square meter, compared with maximum heat collection rates of 700 or 800 W per square meter in full sunlight. Also, the cooling effect is generally uncorrelated in time with the cooling loads. Therefore, for a night sky radiant cooling method to be cost-effective, it must either be of extremely low cost or must piggyback to provide a cooling function on top of an existing heat collection function, plus it ideally would have low cost thermal storage as well. Several techniques have been described for night sky radiant cooling, such as flushing the roof surface with water at night, and using relatively low efficiency solar collectors as radiators at night, but these techniques are not practical as yet. The fundamental problem with using solar collectors as radiant cooling devices is that the design of the collector is intended to thermally isolate the fluid from the ambient air and the radiant sky environment. A solar collector with two separate fluid paths that could do double duty as an efficient night sky radiant cooling device could make a significant contribution to cooling flat roof commercial buildings in sunny dry climates.

Moreover, the majority of solar panels on the market today are designed to optimize efficiency for a given amount of solar radiation flux and outside air temperature. The drive for higher efficiency results in the use of relatively expensive materials such as copper, aluminum, and glass, as well as optical treatments such as low emissivity absorber coatings and low reflective coatings for cover glass. The higher the thermal collection efficiency for the panel, the higher will be the stagnation temperature which occurs when the module is in full sunlight but there is no liquid flow to pull the heat away. Stagnation temperatures between 350 and 400° F. are not uncommon for good quality collectors. These high stagnation temperatures then drive the need for even more expensive materials and components to ensure that the panel does not damage itself in full sunlight.

The drive for higher efficiency and the need to withstand high stagnation temperatures increases the cost per unit area of the solar collector. The relatively high cost per unit area, plus the perceived need to generate the most energy in the winter, generally makes it imperative to orient the collector in an optimal position to capture the most possible sunlight to convert to thermal energy. On a commercial rooftop, this means tilting the collectors to an angle which roughly corresponds to the latitude of the building location, or in most of the United States between 25 and 50° to horizontal. Orienting the panel at such a relatively high angle to the horizontal roof brings many problems and costs to the system installation. Structural supports required to maintain the panel in position must be anchored to the roof structure or held in place with heavy ballast blocks. The relatively high profile of the solar panel drives wind loads which can be up to 75 pounds per square foot of collector area. These wind loads must be handled by the module, structural supports, the roof anchors, and the roof itself. On buildings with large flat roofs in relatively high wind areas, it is often not practical to even install large numbers of flat plate solar collectors due to the structural reinforcements that would be required to handle the wind loads. Evacuated tube collectors may have lower but still significant wind loads.

The wind loads also drive significant structural requirements for the panel itself. Solar panels that are mounted in typical, inclined orientations must handle 1000 to 2000 pounds of total force on both the front and back of the panels in both positive and negative directions. This is a significant driver for the thickness of the glazing, the back cover plate, and of the framing, driving flat plate collectors to thicknesses of over three inches. Heavy duty anchors or heavy ballast blocks are usually required to secure the mounting framing to the steel deck and even to the underlying truss structure. Furthermore, mounting the panel at an inclined position exposes the back of the panel to ambient air, resulting in the need for thick insulation to prevent significant loss from the back of the collector. Finally, orienting the solar collector at an angle that is designed to maximize the collection over the course of the year does not result in a heat generation profile that corresponds with the thermal needs of the building if solar cooling is taken into account. To the contrary, about 1.5 times more daily thermal energy is required to cool a typical flat roof commercial building in the summer using heat-to-cooling systems than to heat it in winter with solar heat. Therefore, a horizontal or nearly flat solar collector installation angle would have many advantages, including providing a generation profile that is better matched to the building needs, reducing wind loading on the collector itself, and reducing wind loading that the collector places on the roof structure.

In summary, there are many other design considerations in addition to a high heat collection efficiency per unit area when providing heat to support year-round space conditioning on a flat roof commercial building.

Virtually all existing solutions make use of some form of fin and tube configuration. That is, solar energy is collected on a flat surface normal to the sun's rays, and the heat is conducted along the surface to a tube through which a working fluid flows. As the heat is conducted along the relatively thin absorber surface, there is a significant temperature drop between the absorbing surface and the working fluid. This temperature drop results in thermal losses of between 12 and 18 percent, because the higher temperature of the absorber surface compared to the fluid temperature results in higher losses to the environment. In addition, an efficient fin design requires creating a good thermal bond between the flat sheet and the fluid tube, which is a significant design challenge that drives up costs and creates failure points. The tubes can be clamped, brazed, soldered, or attached with thermal grease, all of which require substantial manufacturing resources. A solar collector configuration which eliminates heat flow transverse to the sun's rays will effectively have a fin efficiency of 1.0, with a significant overall performance improvement, and have none of the assembly issues.

Further, nearly all current designs place the absorber surfaces directly under the glazing. This causes a direct convective and radiative coupling between the two surfaces, accounting for the majority of the heat loss from the collector. The glazing is typically made of low-iron glass, which has a high light transmissivity of about 90% but which is heavy, is a very poor insulator and so does not maintain more than a few degrees temperature difference across it. Since the emissivity of the glass is high (0.9 or so), in order to limit the radiative heat loss, it is necessary for the absorber to have a low emissivity, along with a high absorptivity. This can be achieved using very thin black coatings such as black chrome, but applying such coatings requires specialized techniques such as vacuum deposition. In addition, many such coatings make use of toxic materials that require special handling, all adding considerable expense to the finished product. A collector design in which the absorber surface is somewhat insulated from the glazing, which uses a glazing with more insulating properties, and which can use simpler absorbing materials such as ordinary black paint, would be of lower cost, of higher efficiency, and more environmentally friendly.

Other solutions to reduce collector cost have recently become available that make use of lower cost materials than the classic flat plate or evacuated tube designs. The most common is the unglazed black plastic “pool heater” solar collector. In this collector design, solar radiation is absorbed directly by the black plastic tubes through which the coolant flows. Because there is a low insulation level between the coolant and the environment, this collector design is typically used for low temperature applications in warm climates such as heating water for swimming pools. There are several fundamental limitations which have thus far prevented the deployment of high efficiency, low cost, polymer (i.e., plastic) collectors.

The first problem is the low melting point of plastics that are sufficiently low in cost to be considered for use as collectors. Adding a glazing layer of glass or plastic material over the collector surface is of course the simplest way to increase the efficiency. However, even one glazing layer over a black plastic collector surface can allow the stagnation temperature to quickly exceed the softening point of the plastic.

Secondly, extruded panels with discrete flow channels must be connected to a header or manifold. A waterproof seal must be made between the irregular shape of the cross section of the end of the extrusion and the fluid carrying tube that forms the manifold. The seal is typically made by making the manifold of the same material as the extruded panel and welding the two materials together. The irregular shape of this welded joint makes the joint difficult to fabricate and prone to leakage with thermal cycles.

Further, all plastics have very low strength and stiffness relative to metals. This makes it difficult for plastic solar panels to contain typical aqueous heat transfer fluid that in ordinary solar thermal systems can reach pressures of 150 PSI. The fluid pressure requirements in ordinary solar thermal systems are driven in large part by the use of water-based coolants such as water glycol mixtures which can boil or create vapor bubbles that can rapidly increase the pressure in the fluid passages. A solar collector that makes use of low-cost and lightweight plastic materials, but that overcomes the issues of the low service temperatures and pressure containment, would have the advantages of low cost and weight without the disadvantages of current plastic collector designs.

Thus, there remains a need in the art for a cost effective and efficient solar thermal collector system that may be used on flat roof construction that will avoid the foregoing disadvantages of prior art solar thermal collector systems.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed herein is a solar thermal collector system that is particularly configured for installation on a flat roof of a building. In accordance with aspects of a particular embodiment of the invention, the solar thermal collector system includes a solar thermal collector module having a glazing sheet at a top, exterior surface, and an absorber sheet within the module positioned below and spaced apart from the glazing sheet. At least the absorber sheet is fluidly connected to a fluid handling system, and carries a working fluid that is heated in the module by the sun and transfers such heat to equipment connected to the module by the fluid handling system. The module is preferably provided a thermally actuated valve that allows the working fluid to also flow through the glazing sheet, which results in self-regulation of the temperature of the module below a critical design temperature.

In accordance with a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, a solar thermal collector system is provided having at least one solar thermal module comprising a glazing sheet forming a tope surface of the module, an absorber sheet on an interior of the module and positioned below and spaced apart from the glazing sheet, the absorber sheet being configured to absorb heat from the sun and to transfer heat to a working fluid in the absorber sheet, a first manifold connected to a first end of each of the glazing sheet and the absorber sheet, and a second manifold connected to a second end of each of the glazing sheet and the absorber sheet; and a fluid handling system in fluid communication with each of the first manifold and the second manifold and configured to transfer heat from the solar thermal module to the fluid handling system.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The numerous advantages of the present invention may be better understood by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a building implementing a solar thermal collector system in accordance with certain aspects of an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a side cross-sectional view of a solar thermal module for use with the system of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the solar thermal module of FIG. 2 with certain elements removed for clarity.

FIG. 4 is an end cross-sectional view of the solar thermal module of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing the attachment of a glazing sheet or absorber sheet to a manifold for use with the solar thermal module of FIG. 2.

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a manifold for use with the solar thermal module of FIG. 2.

FIG. 7 is an end cross-sectional view of the solar thermal module of FIG. 2 installed on a flat roof.

FIG. 8 is an end cross-sectional view of the solar thermal module of FIG. 2 installed on a flat roof.

FIG. 9 is a schematic view of the flow of a working fluid through the solar thermal module of FIG. 2.

FIG. 10 is a schematic view of an overall solar thermal collector system in accordance with certain aspects of an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 11 is a detailed schematic view of fluid flow through an upper manifold of the solar thermal module of FIG. 2.

FIG. 12 is a schematic view of temperature self-regulation fluid flow through the solar thermal module of FIG. 2 in various configurations.

FIG. 13 is a detailed perspective view of a thermal actuated valve for use with the solar thermal module of FIG. 2.

FIG. 14 is a close-up perspective view of an actuator for use with the thermal actuated valve of FIG. 13.

FIG. 15 is a schematic view of the operation of the thermal actuated valve of FIG. 13.

FIG. 16 is a top view of valve plates for use with the thermal actuated valve of FIG. 13.

FIG. 17 is another top view of valve plates for use with the thermal actuated valve of FIG. 13.

FIG. 18 is a schematic view of the operation of the thermal actuated valve of FIG. 13 in another configuration.

FIG. 19 is a top view of valve plates for use with the thermal actuated valve of FIG. 18.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following description is of a particular embodiment of the invention, set out to enable one to practice an implementation of the invention, and is not intended to limit the preferred embodiment, but to serve as a particular example thereof. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they may readily use the conception and specific embodiments disclosed as a basis for modifying or designing other methods and systems for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent assemblies do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention in its broadest form.

In accordance with certain aspects of an embodiment of the invention, an improved solar thermal collection system is provided, including one or more solar thermal collection units 100 which may be situated, for instance, on the flat roof 500 of a commercial building, as shown in FIG. 1. The improved solar thermal collection system achieves much lower cost than prior known systems with good performance in the summer season by making use of very low cost, low profile solar thermal collection units 100 that leverage the insulating and structural features of the commercial flat roof 500 itself.

FIG. 2 provides a side, cross-sectional view of one of thermal collection units 100. Thermal collection unit 100 includes a top glazing sheet 102 forming a top layer made of thin (4 to 6 mm) twin wall or triple wall polycarbonate sheet, supported by a lattice of aluminum rectangular tubing 104 (best viewed in FIG. 3), although other lightweight support structures and configurations may be provided. The glazing sheet 102 and its supporting lattice 104 are preferably configured to support compressive environmental loads as high as 50 lbs/ft², and transfer those loads to the perimeter support.

As best viewed in FIG. 3 (showing thermal collection unit 100 without glazing sheet 102 for clarity), the support frame is supported on the sides by notches 106 cut in the thick, multi-wall polycarbonate sheet side support walls 108.

Referring again to FIG. 2, below the glazing sheet 102 is an absorber sheet 110 (also removed from FIG. 3 for clarity), which absorber sheet 110 is also made of thin, twin wall polycarbonate. Absorber sheet 110 is painted black on the back side 111, preferably using ordinary black paint. The glazing sheet 102 and the absorber sheet 110 are connected at each end by a manifold (200 and 300), which in each case comprises a preferably square polycarbonate tube joined to each of the splayed faces of the glazing sheet 102 and the absorber sheet 110, such as by thermowelding, to form a transverse fluid passage that is hydraulically connected to the passages in each of glazing sheet 102 and absorber sheet 110, as discussed in greater detail below. As shown in the sectional view of FIG. 4, the glazing sheet 102 and the vertical side walls 108, along with back wall 112 and front wall 114 of thermal collection unit 100, may all be sealed along all of the edges using thin sheets of polycarbonate material 109 that are joined to the outside faces, such as by way of solvent welding. The solvent welding provides a strong, weather-tight bond almost instantly and at low cost. Together the bonds form a watertight enclosure that prevents air and water intrusion into the central module cavity. The frame 104 is supported by notches 106 in the side walls 108 so that the frame is completely enclosed in the airtight cavity.

As shown in FIG. 2, the thermal absorber surface is inverted from the conventional orientation by being located on the bottom of the transparent fluid carrying channels of absorber sheet 110. Putting the absorbing surface below the fluid passage may provide one or more of the following advantages. First, it is not necessary for the absorbing material to have a low degree of reflectivity, since the degree of solar absorption is a function of the opacity of the material and not the absorptivity. Opaque coatings are much easier to manufacture and apply than high absorptivity/low emissivity coatings. Second, having the absorbing surface facing downward puts the highest temperature portion of the collector in a location that is more insulated and decoupled from the glazing and the environment. The top surface of the absorber is significantly cooler than the black absorber surface, such that it radiates and convects less energy to the glazing.

Other advantages may also be realized through use of the above-described absorber configuration. For example, the tube and fin feature that is a cause of 12 to 18% of losses in almost every existing absorber design is eliminated. This is because the conduction path from the absorbing surface of the absorber sheet 110 to the fluid is only a few millimeters long and is perpendicular to the surface of the sheet, as opposed to a path that is several inches long and is in the plane of the sheet.

As mentioned briefly above, each manifold 200 and 300 is joined to each of glazing sheet 102 and absorber sheet 110. As shown in FIG. 5, and using top glazing sheet 102 as an example (although lower absorber sheet 110 is joined to manifolds 200 and 300 in like fashion), top glazing sheet 102 comprises a multi-wall polycarbonate sheet. A top face 102a and a bottom face 102b of the sheet 102 are separated from one another at the end of the sheet 102 that is to be joined to a manifold 200 or 300 (such as by cutting across the middle of sheet 102 at the end of the sheet so that about one inch of the face sheet on each side is cut away from the transverse cell walls that connect the face sheets to each other), and any inner cells within the region of sheet 102 that are between the splayed apart top face 102a and bottom face 102b are cut away from sheet 102. The bottom face 102b of sheet 102 is bent downward to align with a side wall 300b of manifold 300. As shown in FIG. 6, along at least one and in some cases two corner edges of each manifold 200 and 300, slots 202 are provided that perforate the corner edges of the manifold 200 and 300, which allows fluid to enter each manifold 200 and 300 from the absorber sheet 110, and in certain configurations the glazing sheet 102. The splayed face sheets of each twin wall sheet (top face 102a and bottom face 102b in FIG. 5) are attached to the flat faces of manifolds 200 and 300 preferably using plastic joining techniques, such as solvent welding, thermowelding, or bonding.

Connected to each manifold 200 and 300 are fluid fittings 204 that allow a working fluid to enter at the bottom end of the module (which in typical installations will be the south end of the module), flow directly through the narrow space within at least absorber sheet 110 and in certain configurations glazing sheet 102, and exit via the upper manifold (which in typical installations will be the north end of the module), as discussed in greater detail below.

The north and south manifolds, 200 and 300, respectively, and the frame lattice 104, are supported around the perimeter by walls 108, which are also formed of multi-wall polycarbonate. However, these side walls 108 are much thicker (16 mm to 25 mm thick) to transfer the compressive loads to the bottom layer and provide thermal insulation to the air cavity below the glazing. Present in the design, but not shown in the cross-section are triangular-shaped walls that seal the east and west sides of the module 100 and support the glazing along the sides. The back, north wall 112 has the highest profile above the roof and thus is susceptible to the highest wind loading. Sloping the back, north wall 112 slightly (as shown in FIG. 2) has the effect of reducing the horizontal component of the wind loading on that wall, as well as adding a vertical component of the wind which tends to hold the panel down.

With continued reference to FIGS. 2 and 4, below the absorber sheet 110 is a board of rigid insulation 114, such as polyisocyanurate, which preferably has a foil face on the top to reduce radiation coupling with the absorber sheet 110. The bottom layer 116 of the module 100 is a third twin wall polycarbonate sheet that is sealed at the ends so that it forms multiple vessels, each of which is capable of holding liquid ballast, which makes it less susceptible to leaks. A small amount of super absorbent polymer such as sodium polyacrylate can be placed in the ballast sheet before sealing so that when water is added to the volume, it forms a dense gel or solid (depending on the amount of polymer added) so that if the vessel integrity is broken, the water will not leak out. This fluid volume is connected to an additional ballast tank 118 (FIG. 2) which has a fill port extending outside of the module. The ballast tank 118 is preferably shipped dry to minimize transportation weight and ease of handling on the roof. Once the module 100 has been located in the desired location on the roof, the ballast tanks 118 are filled with water from a hose at the installation site. Most of the ballast is spread evenly across the module 100 in the bottom layer sheet 116, while some additional ballast fluid is in the tank 118 near the north wall where most of the horizontal wind loads occur. In order to reduce the stress on the bottom layer sheet 116 from freezing and thawing of the water ballast, the ballast vessel could be preloaded with a few gallons of glycerine, an antifreeze that is compatible with polycarbonate. When mixed, the solution would freeze into a slush which would not burst the walls of the bottom layer sheet 116.

The modules 100 are mounted horizontally, directly in contact with the roof surface, which may offer one or more of the following advantages. First, the near-horizontal mounting may provide an optimal heat collection profile over the year, with more heat collected in the summer cooling season when it is needed to drive heat-to-cooling systems. Second, because the ballast holds the entire back of the module 100 firmly to the roof surface, there is no dynamic pressure resulting from wind coming under the module 100, which eliminates bending loads or uplift loads on the module structure. If only compressive loads need be designed for, much lower cost materials can be used in the design and, further, the amount of site engineering to determine wind loading on a particular installation is greatly reduced. Third, in the absence of airflow behind the collector, the module 100 is thermally coupled to the roof itself, so much less insulation is required than if the back of the panel were exposed to the environment. In this way, the module 100 essentially “borrows”, or makes double use of, the existing roof structure and insulation to reduce module cost without adding significant thermal or structural loading on the building. Fourth, no penetrations of the roof membrane are required in the installation process and so the likelihood of roof leaks is greatly reduced. Fifth, the operation can be performed by very low-skilled labor with no cutting, drilling, mating or resealing operations required.

Moreover, advantages of the design may be realized related to the weight of the module 100 and ballasting compared to typical ballasted solar thermal installations. Due to the density of the materials (glass, copper, aluminum), the area of a typical flat plate collector is often limited by the total lifting weight of the module. For example, a typical 4′×8′ (32 ft²) flat plate solar collector has a shipping weight of about 120 lbs (3.75 lb/ft²), which is the maximum that two workers could reasonably carry without roof top material handling equipment. For the system described herein, the use of lighter materials reduce the shipping weight area density by more than half to only 1.7 lbs/ft², which means that a module twice the size (6′×10′) weighs less than 110 lbs. The same total installed collector area can then have half the lifting weight and half the number of individual modules, reducing installation time significantly.

Further, prior known flat plate modules secured to a flat roof using the ballast technique typically require a ballast weight up to two times the collector weight. Thus, up to 360 lbs for each module (120 lbs for the collector, 240 lbs for the ballast) must be lifted to and supported by the roof; this load is also concentrated at the base of the supporting structure where the ballast is located, resulting in concentrated loads of 20-30 lb/ft². The system described herein derives 80% of its ballast weight from water obtained locally and brought to the roof via water pressure, at virtually no labor or material cost. Further, the ballast is evenly distributed over the area of the module, which places the center of mass of the ballast very low in the center of the module, which is the optimal location to resist rotational moments due to wind. This also results in a peak roof loading of less than 6 lbs/ft², or ⅓ to ⅕ that of the current designs. Also, since the ballast is contained in hundreds of separate containers formed by each of the separate cells formed by the walls of the multi-wall polycarbonate sheets, the ballast sheet can withstand minor cuts and punctures with substantial loss of ballast weight. If the super absorbent polymer is employed, any leaks would be impossible because the water would be locked in a solid state. In summary, the physical installation of the modules of the system described herein requires half the number of modules, imposes less than half the total weight on the roof, and requires no lifting or handling of ballast material. The installation is achieved by simply placing the modules 100 at the desired location and filling them with water.

One potential challenge presented by any in-roof installation is the obstruction of rainwater drainage. For example, in the current system, drainage around an installed module 100 may present a challenge. Skylights or curbs on flat rooftops often have “crickets” installed around them that raise the roof membrane surface slightly on the side that faces the uphill grade to guide water around the obstacle. This could be done in the case of the system described herein if necessary, although it would possibly increase installation costs. This also might not be preferred if a row of modules is placed across a drainage path. An alternative would be to install one or more additional sheets of twin wall polycarbonate underneath the module which have their open cells facing the uphill grade. This would allow standing water to drain under the module without exposing the bottom of the module to wind loads.

Optionally, module 100 may be provided without bottom layer sheet 116 configured to receive water for ballast. For example, as shown in FIG. 7, in installations in which the roof membrane is adhered to the underlying insulation, a flashing 320 may be installed around the perimeter of the module 100 by adhering it to the base of the polycarbonate walls 108. This flashing 320 would be made of the same material as the roof itself, and thus can be attached directly to the roof membrane using the same sealing adhesive materials used to join membrane roof seams. This would eliminate the need for ballast and reduce the total installed weight of module 100.

Similarly, and with reference to FIG. 8, in installations incorporating a ballasted roof design, the roof membrane is not attached to the insulation, but is held in place by about 10 lbs/ft² of gravel ballast which holds the membrane down. In this case, the module 100 may be mounted on a wooden 2×4 frame 330 around the perimeter, and a rubber membrane 332 is placed under the existing gravel ballast. The rubber membrane 332 is bonded to the outside of the polycarbonate walls 108 of the module 100 to enclose a cavity under the module 100 containing the ballast. This has the advantage of requiring no additional materials for ballasting, and maintaining the same total ballast in weight per unit area. In addition, if a portion of the existing ballast equal to the weight of the module 100 is removed upon installation, it is possible for the module 100 to have zero net weight impact on the roof.

FIG. 9 shows a schematic flow diagram of a working fluid as it travels through the module 100 from lower south manifold 300 to upper north manifold 200 along and through absorber sheet 110. The working fluid enters lower south manifold 300, passes into absorber sheet 110 where it absorbs heat from sunlight impacting the thermal absorber surface on the back 111 of absorber sheet 110, and rises in elevation up to upper north manifold 200, from which it exists into a flow system as discussed in greater detail below. It is noted that the fluid entrance into lower south manifold 300 is positioned at an opposite end of the manifold 200 from an outlet on upper north manifold 200 so as to ensure constant and uniform flow of working fluid through module 100.

In operation, the sun's rays pass through top glazing sheet 102 and through absorber sheet 110 itself (and the fluid in the absorber sheet), and strike the black paint on the back surface 111 of absorber sheet 110. This heats up the lower half of the absorber sheet 110. A working fluid is circulated directly through the twin wall absorber sheet 110 from the lower south manifold 300 to the upper north manifold 200, which working fluid picks up the heat and causes it to rise in temperature as it flows. The fluid exits the upper north manifold 200 at a higher temperature, thus collecting solar heat.

FIG. 10 provides a schematic flow diagram showing an arrangement of multiple modules 100 configured as above. As shown in FIG. 10, fluid supply lines 302 supply the working fluid to each module 100, which then proceeds through the module 100. The working fluid may proceed through the module 100 by way of bottom absorber sheet 110 when the system is operated in a heating mode, and may alternatively proceed through the module 100 by way of top glazing sheet 102 when the system is operated in a radiant cooling mode. In a heating mode, the working fluid exits the bottom of manifold 200 into a heat collection return line 304, from which it may be supplied to ceiling mounted radiators 306 that may be configured to radiate heat towards a lower surface of a workspace 312, such as a concrete slab 308, and/or to cooling equipment 310 within the workspace 312 at which the system is installed. The particular configuration of such cooling equipment 310 may be configured as deemed appropriate by persons skilled in the art and is beyond the scope of the instant disclosure, and is therefore not described further here. It is noted, however, that such cooling equipment may likewise be placed in fluid communication with ceiling mounted radiators 306, which may likewise be configured to collect heat radiated from a concrete slab 308. The working fluid is then returned to modules 100 from workspace 312, passing through return lines 313 to pump 314 for resupply through fluid supply line 302 back to the modules 100.

FIG. 11 shows a close-up view of flow into and through upper north manifold 200 from glazing sheet 102 and from absorber sheet 110 in various operational modes. More particularly, FIG. 11a shows the flow in a radiating cooling operational mode, in which the working fluid flows from top glazing sheet 102 into a top portion of upper north manifold 200, and outward through a fluid coupling 204 into a radiant cooling return line 305 (FIG. 10) in those cases in which the modules 100 are to be used for radiant cooling. In this case, the working fluid flows under pump power or thermosihpon effect to ceiling mounted radiators 306 that may be configured to receive heat radiated from the lower surface of a workspace 312, such as concrete slab 308, and then returns to module 100 through supply lines 302 and back through top glazing sheet 102 to radiate the heat collected from ceiling radiators 306 (and in turn heat collected from slab 308) to the sky. Likewise, FIG. 11b shows the flow in a heat collection operational mode, in which the working fluid flows by pump power from bottom absorbing sheet 110 into a bottom portion of upper north manifold 200, and outward through a fluid coupling 204 into heat collection return line 304 (FIG. 10), as discussed above. Further, FIG. 11c shows the flow in a pumped flow, temperature regulation mode, in which the working fluid is supplied under working pressure from pump 314 to the modules 110, with the working fluid flowing through both upper glazing sheet 102 and bottom absorber sheet 110, into upper north manifold 200 and outward through a fluid coupling 204 into heat collection return line 304 (FIG. 10). Still further, FIG. 11d shows the flow in a thermosiphon temperature regulation mode (discussed in greater detail below), in which the working fluid within a single module recirculates through the fluid path of the module, and more particularly through lower absorber sheet 110, into upper north manifold 200, into top glazing sheet 102, into lower south manifold 300, and back into lower absorber sheet 110 as a result of a thermosiphon created when the working fluid becomes stagnant in the module 100 and heats at least a portion of the module beyond a pre-designated design threshold.

Modules 100 are also preferably configured to passively manage their temperature to within the limits of the plastic material that forms the module 100. In this regard, a review of some background on panel temperature regulation is appropriate.

There are two classes of solutions to address the problem of overheating solar collectors. The first class of solutions could be called “open loop,” in which the collector is designed such that the collector materials cannot reach their maximum allowed temperatures even under worst case conditions of full sun, hot environment, and no flow. This has the disadvantages of either 1) putting a limit on the thermal efficiency of the panel in order to maintain the temperature below service limits, or 2) disallowing the use of lower cost materials with lower service temperatures not only for the collector itself, but for the piping and downstream components which may be subject to the stagnation temperature conditions.

The other class of solutions are closed loop, which have some type of additional cooling function that is activated when the temperature of the panel approaches its limit. The closed loop solution is preferable to the open loop because it does not place the same limits on the thermal efficiency of the panel or downstream components such as seals, fluid lines, and valves. The most desirable temperature regulation system is passive (i.e., one that does not require any active electrical or mechanical components), based on fundamental physical properties of the material as opposed to emergent properties of complex designs.

In the system described herein, the material with the lowest service temperature needing to be protected is the center polycarbonate sheet that forms absorber sheet 110, which has a maximum allowable temperature of about 260° F. The configuration for self-regulation of panel temperature is shown in the schematic views of FIG. 12. In this temperature regulation configuration, the upper glazing sheet 102 is also filled with the working fluid and is hydraulically connected to the lower absorber panel 110 at each of the upper north manifold 200 and lower south manifold 300. Under normal pumped flow conditions, the working fluid enters the lower south manifold 300 and flows upwards through the absorber sheet 110, exiting through the upper north manifold 200, as shown in FIG. 12a. Although the upper glazing sheet 102 is also connected to the lower south manifold 300, at low temperatures there is no flow in the upper glazing sheet 102 due to the action of a thermal actuating valve (described below) in the upper north manifold 200 that hydraulically isolates the two panels 102 and 110 at low temperature. When the temperature in the upper north manifold 2000 is below the critical temperature, the absorber sheet 110 and glazing sheet 102 are hydraulically isolated so that the flow goes through the lower absorber sheet 110 while the upper glazing sheet 102 is stagnant with no flow. Because the temperature of the fluid increases as it flows through the lower absorber sheet 110, the upper north manifold 200 has the highest temperature of any location on the module. Thus, the thermal actuating valve is located in this upper north manifold 200. As the valve opens up with increasing temperature (details of the valve action are described below), some flow will be allowed to pass through the upper glazing sheet 102 and mix with the fluid passing through the lower absorber sheet 110 before exiting the upper north manifold 200, as shown in FIG. 12a. If the temperature continues to increase, the flow through the upper glazing sheet 102 and the lower absorber sheet 110 will be approximately equal. The flow of hot working fluid through the upper glazing sheet 102 provides a strong cooling effect on the system, since the upper glazing sheet 102 is directly exposed to the environment. This negative feedback that is established effectively places an upper limit on the possible temperature of the fluid and of the lower absorber sheet 110 itself.

The previous paragraph describes the temperature regulation configuration shown in FIG. 12a under pumped flow conditions. It is preferable, however, that a temperature regulation system be completely passive and thus not count on the functioning of any other mechanical or electrical device. Therefore, the temperature regulation system should also work in the case where there is no pumped flow, such as during a power outage, blockage, other operational failure, or during installation. In the absence of pumped flow, an adequate amount of fluid flow within the panels can be induced using the thermosiphon effect, as shown in FIG. 12b, to bring the heat from the lower absorber sheet 110 to the upper glazing sheet 102 where it can be dissipated. When the fluid temperature rises close to the design limits of the module 100, the thermally actuated valve operates as described above, fluidly connecting the upper glazing sheet 102 and the lower absorber sheet 110 at each end to form a closed fluid loop. The module 100 is configured such that the higher and lower temperature fluid regions of the loop are physically separated from each other and the flow paths are oriented in a vertical direction, such that a differential in the pressure between the high and low temperature vertical columns generates a thermosiphon potential to drive fluid around the loop. In the configuration shown in FIG. 12b, the upper glazing sheet 102 is inclined, and the lower absorber sheet 110 is not planar, but takes advantage of the flexible nature of the polycarbonate sheet to take on a curve on the north end of the absorber sheet 110 (i.e., the end of absorber sheet 110 closest to upper north manifold 200). This causes the thermosiphon potential to be driven by the difference between the average temperature of the upper glazing sheet 102 and the average temperature of only the inclined portion of the lower absorber sheet 110. With the flow in the clockwise direction, the temperature in the inclined portion of the lower absorber sheet 110 will be much higher than the average temperature of the entire absorber sheet 110, and so much more thermosiphon potential can be generated. With this flow configuration, a tilt of only 10° to 15° in upper glazing sheet 102 is required to generate adequate thermosiphon flow to maintain the temperature limits.

Any fluid may generate thermosiphon pressure under the right conditions; however, three properties of the particular working fluid described herein are significant to achieving meaningful flowrates: high density, high coefficient of thermal expansion, and low viscosity. The preferred working fluid used in the system described herein is PDMS (described in greater detail below), which has a very high coefficient of thermal expansion, roughly 5 times that of water, combined with a density that is only 15% less than water. The viscosity is much higher than water at room temperature, but at the operating temperatures of a solar thermal system, it is comparable to that of water. This makes this thermal fluid particularly suited to thermosiphon applications, because the pressure available due to the thermosiphoning effect is proportional to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the liquid, the density of the liquid, and the temperature difference between the hot and cold fluid lines.

Two additional configurations for achieving the thermosiphon flow are shown in FIGS. 12c and 12d. FIG. 12c shows a “box” configuration in which the module 100 is mounted in a horizontal orientation, and two short vertical risers connect the upper glazing sheet 102 and the lower absorber sheet 110 at each end. If the riser as shown on the left of FIG. 12c is oriented towards the north end of the module, and is painted black so as to absorb some solar energy, there will be a thermosiphon flow in the clockwise direction (as viewed in FIG. 12c) proportional to the temperature difference between the fluid in the two risers, and the height of the risers. The thermally actuated valve is located in the upper north manifold 200 (left side in the drawing). A riser height of about 1 inch per foot of length of panel is preferred to generate adequate thermosiphon flow.

Likewise, as shown in FIG. 12d, the upper glazing sheet 200 and the lower absorber sheet 110 share a common manifold at the top (200) and the bottom (300), and the distance between the two panels is small compared to the size of the panels. In this configuration, the thermosiphon potential is proportional to the average temperature difference between the fluid in the top glazing sheet 102 and the bottom absorber sheet 110, and the angle of tilt of the sheets. Given the properties of the sheets, the working fluid, and the temperature ranges of interest, a module tilt of greater than 35° is preferred to maintain the temperature of the module 100 below design limits. This is the preferred configuration for mounting of modules 100 on inclined roofs.

As mentioned above, the thermally actuated valve is mounted in the upper manifold 200 on the hot end of the module 100. This will either be the end of the module that is oriented toward the north in the box thermosiphon design, or the upper end of the module using either of the other two configurations discussed above. The main function of the valve is to hydraulically isolate the upper glazing sheet 102 from the lower absorber sheet 110 when below the critical temperature, and to allow flow between the two sheets when above the critical temperature. The thermosiphon pressure is very small (about 0.015 psi) compared to pumped flow pressures (about 10 psi), such that it may be difficult to support axial flow along the manifold because the small cross-sectional area of the manifold compared to the upper glazing sheet 102 and the lower absorber sheet 110 would result in excessive pressure drop. Therefore, in the thermosiphon case, the valve is designed to allow flow to enter from the lower absorber sheet 110 and pass vertically through the valve to enter the upper glazing sheet 102.

FIG. 13 provides a schematic view of thermally actuated valve (shown generally at 400) positioned within upper north manifold 200. The valve 400 divides the upper north manifold 200 into an upper cavity and a lower cavity. The upper cavity is in fluid communication with the upper glazing sheet 102, and the lower cavity is in fluid communication with the lower absorber sheet 110. The flow area on the interior of upper manifold 200 is opened to the fluid in the upper glazing sheet 102 by providing a series of slots 402 along the upper, corner edge of the manifold 200. Similarly, the flow area on the interior of upper manifold 200 is opened to the fluid in the lower absorber sheet 110 by providing a series of slots 404 along the lower, corner edge of the manifold 200. Segments of solid material are provided between slots 402 and between slots 404, and are provided to maintain the shape of the manifold 200 while allowing fluid to flow from the sheets into the interior of the manifold 200.

To assemble the valve 400, two side rails 406 are first inserted into the preferably square polycarbonate tube of manifold 200. Each rail may have preferably two grooves 408 cut along its length facing the interior walls of the manifold 200, and each groove 408 preferably holds a linear rubber gasket 410. A lower valve plate 420 is inserted into an interior groove 412 on the inside of each rail 406, which forces the two rails 406 towards the interior walls of the manifold 200, which in turn seats the linear rubber gaskets 410 and fluidly separates the upper and lower cavities on the interior of manifold 200. A second upper valve plate 430 is inserted just above the lower valve plate 420; this upper valve plate 430 is sized so as to provide sufficient clearance between the outer edges of upper valve plate 430 and the interior walls of side rails 406 so that it easily slides axially in the manifold 200. In addition, it operates in a bath of PDMS, otherwise known as “silicone oil” (i.e., the working fluid), which is an excellent lubricant. A thermal actuator 440 may be provided just below the lower valve plate 420, which may be used to move the upper valve plate 430 based on temperature. The function of each of these components is described below.

The actuator 440 is preferably configured as a long cylindrical rod immersed in the working fluid in the lower portion of the manifold 200. The fluid exiting the upper, hottest portion of the absorber sheet 110 bathes the actuator 440 in fluid so that the temperature of the rod is within a few degrees of the hottest fluid in the module 100. The rod is preferably made of a material that has a relatively high coefficient of thermal expansion, and which also maintains adequate stiffness at the upper service temperature. Polyvinyldiene fluoride (PVDF), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are suitable materials, with a linear expansion of about ¼″ to ⅜″ between 180° F. and 230° F. for a 48″ to 60″ rod. PVDF is preferred because it has a higher coefficient of thermal expansion and it maintains a higher compressive modulus at the service temperature. As shown in the close-up view of one end of actuator 440 of FIG. 14, the PVDF rod 442 is inserted into a sheath 444 formed by a copper tube that is closed on one end. The sheath 444 supports the rod 442 around the sides, giving it compressive strength and preventing buckling. Copper is preferred for the sheath 444 because it has the highest thermal diffusivity of any non-precious metal, which reduces the time lag in the temperature of the actuator 440.

When the average temperature of the rod 442 is below the critical temperature, the end of the rod 442 is retracted inside the copper tube sheath 444 as in the left view of FIG. 14. The length of the rod 442 is selected so that at the lower end of the critical temperature range (preferably about 180° F.), the flat end of the rod 442 is just flush with the open end of the sheath 444. As the temperature increases from the lower part of the critical range to the upper part, the rod 442 extends beyond the end of the tube 444 and provides an actuating force over a distance of about three eighths of an inch.

As shown in the schematic view of the thermally actuated valve 400 of FIG. 15, a tab 432 attached to the upper plate 430 is held between the balanced forces of the actuator 400 and a reacting spring 414. The spring 414 holds the tab 432 against the end of the actuator rod 442, or at the end of the sheath 444 if the actuator rod 442 is retracted inside the sheath 444.

The valve body consists of lower valve plate 420 and upper valve plate 430, which again are mounted so as to extend horizontally across the manifold 200. The bottom valve plate 420 is fixed and, as mentioned above, is mounted such that it has a compression fit on the sides with side rails 406 so that no flow can go around the bottom valve plate 420. The bottom valve plate 420 has a regular series of slots 422 cut into it, as shown in the schematic view of FIG. 16. The width of each slot 422 is equal to the stroke of the thermal actuator 440 as it moves from the lower to upper critical temperature range, about ⅜″. The upper plate 430, located on top of the lower plate 420, may have a matching pattern of slots 432 and is held against the end of the thermal actuator 400 by the spring 414. At lower temperatures, when the tab 432 is held against the end of the sheath 444, the slots 422 and 432 are not aligned such that no flow passes through the slots. As the temperature increases, and the thermal actuator moves the upper plate 430, the slots 422 and 432 begin to align, which opens a flow area proportional to the temperature of the actuator, which in turn allows flow to pass perpendicular to the plates.

In the simplest implementation, the slot pattern of the upper and lower plates 430 and 420, respectively, are identical. This allows for function of the valve with relatively simple fabrication techniques. One challenge with this configuration, however, is that once the critical temperature is reached, all of the slots open at the same time. Because the temperature of the fluid in the upper portion of manifold 200 can be much lower than the temperature of the fluid in the lower portion of manifold 200, a sudden influx of cool fluid could quench the actuator 440, causing it to suddenly contract and resulting in instability. By having a variable spacing of the slots 432 in the upper plate 430 as shown in FIG. 17, the slots can open in groups, such as 25% at one time, then another 25%, etc., allowing for a more gradual transition of the flow and less instability. In order to accommodate the variable spacing of slots 432 in upper plate 430, the width of the slots 422 in the lower plate 420 is increased so that the slots that open first do not begin to close again when the valve approaches the fully open condition.

The thermally actuated valve has the advantage of being housed entirely in the upper north manifold 200, and if the end plate of the manifold 200 is removable, the valve can be maintained in the field without further disassembly of the module.

Thermally actuated valve 400 may optionally be provided without actuator 440, in which case opening of the thermally actuated valve 400 is dependent solely upon expansion of upper valve plate 430 and/or bottom valve plate 420. More particularly, material that undergoes thermal expansion expands in every dimension. Because the width of the thermally actuated valve 400 is much smaller than its length, the expansion may be approximated as being linear. If one end of a long piece of solid material is fixed, the axial deflection of any one point is proportional to its distance from the fixed end. That is, a point on a rod that is close to a fixed end of the rod will not deflect much at all, while a point on the opposite end will deflect the most. In order to achieve an even amount of flow across the whole length of the thermally actuated valve 400, it is important that the valve open area be relatively constant over the length. In a configuration that does not make use of actuator 440, both the upper valve plate 430 and the lower valve plate 420 are fixed at opposite ends, as shown in the schematic view of the valve of FIG. 18 and the schematic view of valve plates 420 and 430 of FIG. 19. In this configuration, valve plates 420 and 430 are allowed to expand in opposite directions so that the deflection of the two plates relative to one another is equal, and so that the open valve area will be the same across the whole length of the valve.

Below the critical temperature, and as shown particularly in FIGS. 18a and 19a, the ends of the two plates 420 and 430 are fixed at opposite ends of the manifold 200, such that the slots 422 and 432 are fully unaligned and there is no free flow area. As the temperature begins to rise, the top valve plate 430 expands to the right and the lower valve plate 420 expands to the left (as shown particularly in FIGS. 18b through 18c and in FIGS. 19b through 19e). The deflection is proportional to the temperature change and the distance from the fixed end, such that the total relative deflection is the same along the length. The slots 422 and 432 are arranged such that when the upper end of the critical temperature range is reached, the slots are fully aligned, as shown in FIGS. 18c and 19e, and the flow area is open along the whole length of the valve.

This configuration has the advantage of requiring only two moving parts: the upper valve plate 430 and the lower valve plate 420 themselves. The elimination of the thermal actuator 440 opens up more of the lower half of the manifold 200 for fluid flow, reducing the pressure drop and reducing pumping power.

The selection of the particular fluid to serve as the thermal working fluid is important in this ultra-low-cost solar collector design. The working fluid must have low viscosity, adequate thermal conductivity and heat capacity, be non-toxic, have very low vapor pressure at high temperatures, and most importantly be chemically compatible with the polycarbonate material. One fluid that meets all these requirements is polydimethyl siloxane, or PDMS, commonly known as silicone oil. It is also colorless, odorless, and non-toxic, and also provides good lubrication of the thermal valve sliding surfaces.

Moreover, the fluid type used as the working fluid may also offer performance advantages. Most solar thermal working fluids are water-based with some type of antifreeze added. The PDMS fluid has two main advantages compared to water. First, water is not compatible with polycarbonate at elevated temperatures since the water can penetrate the plastic and disrupt the chemical bonds. Second, the vapor pressure of water rises rapidly with temperature, which requires that the fluid passages be made of high tensile strength materials such as metals and that the cross section must generally be round to contain pressures as high as 150 psi. PDMS fluid has a very low vapor pressure even at elevated temperatures, enables the use of fluid channels that are made of plastic, and also of arbitrary cross section. In the system disclosed herein, the flow is essentially planar across the very thin absorber sheet 110. The hydraulic diameter in the direction of the flow is one to two orders of magnitude greater than that corresponding to a typical serpentine flow solar collector or a pool heater with small flow passages. The larger hydraulic diameter implies greatly reduced flow velocities that then reduce the pressure drop across the module by an order of magnitude compared to typical solar panels, resulting in lower pumping loss and further reductions in static pressure. The lower velocity of the fluid across the absorber surface does also reduce the heat transfer coefficient between the absorber surface and a working fluid. However, the much larger heat transfer area more than makes up for the lower heat transfer coefficient, so that the temperature differences between the fluid and the wall are comparable to standard collectors employing the serpentine tube arrangement.

Having now fully set forth the preferred embodiments and certain modifications of the concept underlying the present invention, various other embodiments as well as certain variations and modifications of the embodiments herein shown and described will obviously occur to those skilled in the art upon becoming familiar with said underlying concept. It should be understood, therefore, that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically set forth herein.

Claims

1. A solar thermal collector system comprising:

at least one solar thermal module comprising: a glazing sheet forming a top surface of said module; an absorber sheet on an interior of said module and positioned below and spaced apart from said glazing sheet, said absorber sheet being configured to absorb heat from the sun and to transfer heat to a working fluid in said absorber sheet; a first manifold connected to a first end of each of said glazing sheet and said absorber sheet; and a second manifold connected to a second end of each of said glazing sheet and said absorber sheet; and

a fluid handling system in fluid communication with each of said first manifold and said second manifold and configured to transfer heat from said solar thermal module to said fluid handling system.

2. The solar thermal collector system of claim 1, said module further comprising a horizontal base forming a horizontal bottom surface of said module.

3. The solar thermal collector system of claim 2, wherein said horizontal base further comprises a ballast vessel configured to be filled with and to store a ballast liquid therein.

4. The solar thermal collector system of claim 3, said ballast vessel further comprising a multi-wall polycarbonate sheet.

5. The solar thermal collector system of claim 3, further comprising a ballast tank positioned within said interior of said module and in fluid communication with said ballast vessel.

6. The solar thermal collector system of claim 1, said absorber sheet having a top planar side and a bottom planar side spaced apart from said top planar side.

7. The solar thermal collector system of claim 6, said absorber sheet further comprising a multi-wall polycarbonate sheet.

8. The solar thermal collector system of claim 6, said absorber sheet having a thermal absorbing surface on said bottom planar side.

9. The solar thermal collector system of claim 8, wherein said thermal absorbing surface further comprises black paint applied to a bottom face of said bottom planar side.

10. The solar thermal collector system of claim 1, wherein said second manifold is positioned at a higher elevation than said first manifold, and wherein said absorber sheet has a horizontal portion extending away from said first manifold and an upwardly curved portion extending toward said second manifold.

11. The solar thermal collector system of claim 1, wherein said first and second manifolds are in fluid communication with an interior of said absorber sheet.

12. The solar thermal collector system of claim 11, wherein said first and second manifolds are in fluid communication with an interior of said glazing sheet.

13. The solar thermal collector system of claim 12, further comprising a thermal actuating valve positioned within said second manifold.

14. The solar thermal collector system of claim 13, wherein said thermal actuating valve is configured to self-regulate a temperature of said module to maintain the module at a temperature below a predesignated design threshold temperature.

15. The solar thermal collector system of claim 14, wherein said thermal actuating valve is configured to open to cause fluid flow through said glazing sheet.

16. The solar thermal collector system of claim 1, further comprising a working fluid within and configured to flow within said module and said fluid handling system.

17. The solar thermal collector system of claim 16, wherein said working fluid comprises polydimethyl siloxane.