MIDSOLE FOR REDUCING LOAD APPLIED ON KNEE
The present invention relates to a midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, and more particularly, to a midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, in which a first soft portion and a second soft portion are disposed at a front inner side and a rear inner side so as to allow an inner knee to relatively and smoothly move, thereby reducing impact and load concentrated on an inner knee joint, and expecting improved exercise capacity.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-0051293 filed in the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Apr. 29, 2014, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELDThe present invention relates to a midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, and more particularly, to a midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, in which a first soft portion and a second soft portion are disposed at a front inner side and a rear inner side so as to allow an inner knee to relatively and smoothly move, thereby reducing impact and load concentrated on an inner knee joint, and expecting improved exercise capacity.
BACKGROUND ARTRecently, with a rise in living standard and customer's various needs, a number of types of shoes having various designs are being manufactured, and special shoes having various functions are also being released on the market.
As illustrated in
Meanwhile, in the case of outdoor-type shoes, instead of existing traditional outdoor-type shoes such as MID-CUT or HI-CUT style shoes, products which are light and excellent in cushioning and wearing comfort are being developed. However, in the case of hiking boots, cushioning property and wearing comfort are emphasized because hiking causes more injury factors than other sports, but recently developed hiking boots rather increases a risk of injuries and are not helpful enough to improve exercise capacity.
According to the report published by the American Podiatric Medical Association, three-fourths of Americans suffer from chronic foot problems, and medical treatment for the foot problems is treated at least 55,000,000 times or more every year. However, the shocking thing is that most of the foot problems are caused by the shoes. The shoes change bone structures of the feet, and result in pain in the knee and the waist. In the case of Korea, according to the result of analysis of data of medical consultation fees by the national health insurance, for five years from 2005 to 2009, from the Policy Institute of the National Health Insurance Service, the fees for treatment for acquired injuries caused by shoes have increased as much as 77%. In particular, in the case of hiking that Korean enjoys, because hiking requires a larger amount of exercise and causes more risks of injuries than any other sports, injury prevention systems need to be sufficiently adopted to the shoes.
In particular, in the case of injuries associated with knee joints, the number of female patients was 36,000 (in 2009), and is seven times more than the number of male patients. When analyzing the progress of patients per 100,000 people, the number of male patients of all ages consistently increased over the past five years, while the number of female patients in their thirties or less and seventies or more slowly increased, and the number of female patients in their forties to sixties rapidly increased.
The number of patients per 100,000 people by regional groups is 108.2 in Seoul, 97.1 in Busan, and 97.0 in Jeollabuk-do in order of decreasing number, and the number of patients is higher in big cities.
It can be seen from the aforementioned results that men and women all choose shoes in consideration of style and design of the shoes instead of stability of the shoes, which causes the acquired injuries to the bones of the foot.
Impact is absorbed and thrusting force is created during a process in which a person steps on the ground from the heel to the big toe in accordance with movement of the foot, but in the case of the patients with injuries to the knee, particularly, arthritic patients, movement of adduction applied to an inner knee is increased, which causes damage to inner cartilages.
Therefore, it is required to develop shoes having a structure capable of protecting ankle joints and knee joints, and particularly, it is required to develop the midsole.
Meanwhile,
However, the aforementioned Korean Patent is excellent in terms of a function of absorbing impact, but does not present a technical configuration regarding a structure for reducing impact and load concentrated on the knee joints in consideration of movement characteristics of the knee joints.
LITERATURE OF RELATED ART Patent Literature(Patent Literature 1) 1. Korean Patent Application Laid-Open No. 10-2000-0017890 (Apr. 6, 2000)
(Patent Literature 2) 2. Korean Patent No. 10-1075172 (Oct. 19, 2011)
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention has been made in an effort to provide a midsole, in which a first soft portion and a second soft portion are disposed at a front inner side and a rear inner side so as to allow an inner knee to relatively and smoothly move, thereby reducing impact and load concentrated on an inner knee joint, and expecting improved exercise capacity.
The present invention has also been made in an effort to provide a midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, in which inclined surfaces are formed at a soft portion and a hard portion, and the inclined surfaces are joined together, thereby minimizing inconvenience caused by a difference in hardness.
The present invention has also been made in an effort to provide a midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, in which an arch shank, which has greater hardness than a hard portion, is formed at an arch portion, thereby improving functions of distributing and absorbing impact using elastic actions of an arch and a foot arch.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides a midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, the midsole including: a first soft portion which is formed at a front inner side based on an arch portion of a foot; a second soft portion which is formed at a rear inner side based on the arch portion of the foot; and a hard portion which is formed in the remaining region except for the first and second soft portions and in a region of the arch portion of the foot, and has greater hardness than the first and second soft portions.
The first soft portion and the second soft portion may have the same hardness.
A hardness ratio of the soft portion to the hard portion may be 1:1.1 to 1.6.
The soft portion and the hard portion may be joined together while being in direct contact with each other.
The soft portion and the hard portion may have inclined cross sections that are vertically joined together, respectively, and a value of hardness in a region where the soft portion and the hard portion are joined together may be between a value of hardness of the soft portions and a value of hardness of the hard portion.
An arch shank, which has greater hardness than the hard portion, may be installed in a region of the hard portion which corresponds to the arch portion of the foot.
The arch shank may be installed in a foot arch region between the first soft portion and the second soft portion.
The midsole may be configured to be inserted into an outsole having a bottom portion and a side wall portion.
According to the midsole according to the present invention which reduces a load applied to a knee, the first soft portion and the second soft portion are disposed at the front inner side and the rear inner side so as to allow an inner knee to relatively and smoothly move, thereby reducing impact and load concentrated on an inner knee joint, and expecting improved exercise capacity.
According to the midsole according to the present invention which reduces a load applied to a knee, the inclined surfaces are formed at the soft portion and the hard portion, and the inclined surfaces are joined together, thereby minimizing inconvenience caused by a difference in hardness.
According to the midsole according to the present invention which reduces a load applied to a knee, the arch shank, which has greater hardness than the hard portion, is formed at the arch portion, thereby improving functions of distributing and absorbing impact using elastic actions of the arch and the foot arch and reducing a load applied to a knee.
Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the description of the present invention, the specific descriptions of publicly known related functions or configurations will be omitted when it is determined that the specific descriptions may unnecessarily obscure the subject matter of the present invention. In addition, the terms used in the description are defined considering the functions of the present invention and may vary depending on the intention of a user or an operator or precedents. Therefore, the definitions should be made based on the entire contents of the present specification.
Referring to
Specifically, the midsole 10 according to the present invention, which reduces a load applied to the knee, may include the first soft portion 11 which is formed at a front inner side based on an arch portion of a foot, the second soft portion 13 which is formed at a rear inner side based on the arch portion of the foot, and the hard portion 15 which is formed in the remaining region except for the first and second soft portions 11 and 13 and in a region of the arch portion of the foot, and has greater hardness than the first and second soft portions 11 and 13.
The first soft portion 11 and the second soft portion 13 are spaced apart from each other in a forward and rearward direction based on a foot arch region, and formed in an inner region of the foot.
The first soft portion 11 is formed in a front inner side region including a big toe portion, and serves to allow the big toe, which creates thrusting force when a user walks or runs, to smoothly move.
The second soft portion 13 is formed in a rear inner side region including an inner side of a heel, and serves to absorb load or impact when the user steps on the ground, and to allow the knee to smoothly move.
Both of the first soft portion 11 and the second soft portion 13 may be made of the same material, for example, ethylene-vinyl acetate, and may have the same hardness. However, the first soft portion and the second soft portion may be made of different materials as long as the first soft portion and the second soft portion have the same hardness.
The hard portion 15 is formed at the arch portion of the foot and at a front outer side and a rear outer side of the arch portion, and is harder than the soft portion, and has greater hardness than the soft portion.
A hardness ratio of the soft portion to the hard portion may be 1:1.1 to 1.6.
The reason is that in a case in which a hardness ratio is lower than the aforementioned range, for example, in a case in which a hardness ratio of the second soft portion to the hard portion is lower than 1:1.1, there is a relatively little difference in hardness, and as a result, the second soft portion may not sufficiently serve to protect the knee.
In a case in which a hardness ratio is higher than the aforementioned range, for example, in a case in which a hardness ratio of the second soft portion to the hard portion is higher than 1:1.6, wearing comfort deteriorates due to a difference in hardness, and there is a risk that an ankle portion will be injured when the user steps on the ground. Accordingly, the hardness ratio may be within the aforementioned range.
Referring to
As illustrated, the inclined cross sections 11a and 13a of the soft portions 11 and 13 may be disposed over the inclined cross sections 15a and 15b of the hard portion 15, and vice versa.
The reason why the inclined cross sections are formed at the soft portions and the hard portion and then the inclined cross sections are joined together, as described above, is to prevent heterogeneity caused by a difference in hardness between the soft portions and the hard portion, and minimize deterioration in wearing comfort.
That is, the aforementioned configuration allows boundaries between the soft portions and the hard portion to have intermediate hardness values, and serves to prevent the hardness from being rapidly changed in a stepwise manner.
Referring to
The arch shank 17 serves to more rigidly support the arch portion of the foot.
In the present invention, the first soft portion and the second soft portion are disposed in a region corresponding to the inside of the foot, such that the entirety of the inside region of the foot smoothly moves. However, in a case in which a difference in hardness between the first and second soft portions and the hard portion is great, or a separation distance between the first soft portion and the second soft portion is small, there is concern that the region of the arch portion will collapse. In this case, the arch shank rigidly supports the arch portion of the foot, thereby allowing the arch portion to smoothly perform inherent functions of distributing weight and absorbing impact.
Referring to
For example, the arch shank 17a may be made of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU).
The midsole of the present invention may be configured to be stacked on an outsole 20 as illustrated in
Hereinafter, Examples of the midsole according to the present invention which reduces a load applied to the knee will be described in detail.
EXAMPLE 1Based on the foot arch inside the arch portion of the foot, the first soft portion was disposed at the front side, the second soft portion was disposed at the rear side, and the hard portion was disposed in the remaining region except for the first and second soft portions. Further, the midsole was manufactured by joining the first and second soft portions and the hard portion.
In this case, the first and second soft portions were made of soft EVA, the hard portion was made of hard EVA, and a hardness ratio of the soft portion to the hard portion was 1:1.2.
EXAMPLE 2A midsole was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1, except that the hardness ratio of the soft portion to the hard portion was 1:1.3.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1Unlike Example 1, a midsole was not divided into the first and second soft portions and the hard portion, and the midsole was manufactured by injection-molding hard EVA, which is identical in hardness to the hard EVA of the hard portion of Example 1.
Meanwhile, shoes were manufactured using the midsoles of Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1, force (medial contact force), which is applied to the inside of the shoe from a moment when the shoe comes into contact with the ground (stance phase: 0%) to a moment when the shoe is lifted off the ground (stance phase: 100%), was measured, and the results were illustrated as a graph in
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating measured values of medial contact force with respect to a stance phase in Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1.
Referring to
As described above, the midsole according to the present invention has advantages in that the medial contact force applied to the inside of the foot (shoe) is reduced such that an ankle joint may smoothly move, and movement of adduction applied to the inner knee is minimized, and ultimately, it is possible to prevent cartilage in the knee from being damaged.
EXAMPLE 3A midsole was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1, except that cross sections, which are inclined at 45°, were formed at the first and second soft portions and the hard portion, and then joined together.
In this case, the inclined cross section of the hard portion was disposed over the inclined cross sections of the soft portions.
EXAMPLE 4In Example 3, an arch shank, which was obtained by injection-molding thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), was joined to a lower surface of the hard portion. In this case, the arch shank was laterally disposed on the arch portion including the foot arch.
In order to find out wearing comfort of the shoes that are manufactured using the midsoles of Examples 1 to 4, sensory tests were carried out on 100 people (fifty were male and fifty were female).
In the sensory tests, people wore the corresponding shoes and walked around for one hour, and thereafter, estimated wearing comfort of the respective shoes.
Reference of the sensory test: wearing comfort was estimated in accordance with a seven-point scale in which “1” means “very bad”, “2” means “bad”, “3” means “not good”, “4” means “fair”, “5” means “slightly good”, “6” means “good”, and “7” means “very good”, and average values of the result values are shown in the following table.
As shown in Table 1, it can be seen that a level of wearing comfort is high in Examples 1 to 4, and particularly, a level of wearing comfort is significantly high in Examples 3 and 4 in which the inclined surfaces are formed at boundaries between the soft portions and the hard portion, and a level of wearing comfort is highest in Example 4 in which the arch shank is provided.
Meanwhile, specific exemplary embodiments have been described in the detailed description of the present invention and the accompanying drawings, but the present invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments, and various substitutions, modifications, and changes may be made by those skilled in the technical field to which the present invention pertains without departing from the technical spirit of the present invention. Therefore, it should be interpreted that the scope of the present invention is not defined as being limited to the described exemplary embodiments, but includes technologies equivalent to the appended claims as well as the claims.
Claims
1. A midsole which reduces a load applied to a knee, the midsole comprising:
- a first soft portion which is formed at a front inner side based on an arch portion of a foot;
- a second soft portion which is formed at a rear inner side based on the arch portion of the foot; and
- a hard portion which is formed in the remaining region except for the first and second soft portions and in a region of the arch portion of the foot, and has greater hardness than the first and second soft portions.
2. The midsole of claim 1, wherein the first soft portion and the second soft portion have the same hardness.
3. The midsole of claim 2, wherein a hardness ratio of the soft portion to the hard portion is 1:1.1 to 1.6.
4. The midsole of claim 1, wherein the soft portion and the hard portion are joined together while being in direct contact with each other.
5. The midsole of claim 1, wherein the soft portion and the hard portion have inclined cross sections that are vertically joined together, respectively, and a value of hardness in a region where the soft portion and the hard portion are joined together is between a value of hardness of the soft portions and a value of hardness of the hard portion.
6. The midsole of claim 1, wherein an arch shank, which has greater hardness than the hard portion, is installed in a region of the hard portion which corresponds to the arch portion of the foot.
7. The midsole of claim 1, wherein the arch shank is installed in a foot arch region between the first soft portion and the second soft portion.
8. The midsole of claim 1, wherein the midsole is configured to be inserted into an outsole having a bottom portion and a side wall portion.
Type: Application
Filed: Apr 21, 2015
Publication Date: Oct 29, 2015
Inventors: Tae Sun KANG (Seoul), Sang Jun PARK (Seoul)
Application Number: 14/691,875