Double Acute Angle Hydro and Wind Turbine
An efficient low flow, low head, undershot double acute angle turbine where the flow strikes the blades at 90° without the Betz limit. Blades are set at an acute angle to the axle and the turbine is positioned in the flow at the compliment of the blade angle. There is no lag on downstream blades. There is no turbulence when the idle blade enters the flow. Active blades exhaust to the next blade to extract more energy. Simple adjustments set the flow to the blade tip that will produce the highest rotational speed. It is portable. It can be scaled up for larger applications by adding blades to the axle or using longer blades. It can be made from repurposed materials using hand tools. Hydro installations include in a sluice and on a floating barge. It has been tested successfully in flowing water and wind.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to hydro and wind turbines. More specifically, the invention pertains to an undershot, low head and low flow water turbine that functions also as a wind turbine.
2. Description of Related Art
Hydro and wind turbines are either axial flow or cross-flow turbines. Propeller turbines are axial flow because the flow is along the axle. According to the Betz equation, their efficiency cannot exceed 59.26% because the flow cannot strike a blade at 90°, the most powerful angle. A direct strike would stop the rotation.
Cross-flow hydro turbines have the flow across the axle. The large wheel at a grist mill is a cross-flow turbine. Cross-flow turbines have efficiencies of 85% to over 95%. The Turgo turbine has an efficiency in the high 90s, but it requires a head of 50 to 250 meters. The Banki-Michell turbine achieves 85% efficiency, but it requires precise jets and blades and a heavy, permanent installation. The efficiency of the Francis turbine exceeds 90%, but it requires a head of 130 to 2,000 feet. The Kaplan turbine modifies the Francis turbine so that it has a higher efficiency and requires a lower head, 10 to 70 meters. A complete review of turbine characteristics may be found in Wikipedia articles on “Water Turbine” and “Water Wheel”.
Darrieus-type turbines (U.S. Pat. No. 1,835,018) have the advantages of striking the blade at 90° and being omnidirectional, but they suffer from lag. Lag is when the idle blades are in the downstream position so the flow strikes the back of the blade, forcing a backward rotation. The net efficiency of this type of turbine is the positive thrust minus the lag. There have been many inventions to reduce or eliminate lag (U.S. Pat. No. 4,838,757; 2014/0,023,500; 2014/0,140,812; 2014/0,217,738; and Foreign Pat. No. EP 2,667,016; KR 1014/18,011; WO 2015/034,096; WO 2014/132,842).
Cross-flow turbines can have the flow strike the blades above the axle, at the axle, or below the axle. They are called overshot, breast shot, or undershot turbines. The grist mill is an overshot turbine. Its flow uses only 25% of the blade surfaces.
In 300 BC the Greeks invented the undershot turbine, which was also called the ship turbine because it was a wheel on a ship that was anchored in a river. As the blades entered the flow there was a turbulence, which reduced the efficiency. In 1823 Poncelet used curved blades to reduce this turbulence. It produced an efficiency of 70% to 80%, as noted in a Wikipedia article on the “Poncelet Wheel”. The 70% occurred when the flow was so high it overflowed the buckets. This problem will not occur in the present invention because it uses blades, not buckets. The Poncelet undershot turbine equaled the efficiency of the overshot turbine. The overshot turbine requires more head than the undershot turbine, 2 to 10 meters versus fewer than 2 meters, as reported by M. Denny, “The efficiency of overshot and undershot waterwheels,” Institute of Physics Publishing, European Journal of Physics, Vol. 25 (2004) 193-202. Thus, the undershot turbine can be used in more locations than an overshot one.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe health and economies of remote villages would benefit from a constant source of power. This invention would drive machines such as water pumps, flour mills, and alternators to charge batteries for LED lighting, computers for education and entertainment, phones, refrigeration for pharmaceuticals, and farm equipment, which uses expensive fuel or animal power that requires food and creates CO2.
This patent describes a low-head, low-flow, undershot water turbine that can be used also as a wind turbine. It can be built from repurposed materials using hand tools. It drives off-the-shelf alternators. It is easy to maintain. It can be shifted without modification from water to wind to meet changing weather and political conditions. It is portable. It does not disrupt down-stream cultures, fish migration, or boat navigation.
This invention differs from existing turbines because it is neither an axial nor a cross-flow turbine. It is a tangential flow turbine where the acute angle of the flow to the axle and the complimentary acute angles of the blades to the axle add to 90° for a maximum thrust. This 90° thrust is achieved very simply. The blades on the axle are set an acute angle to the axle. The turbine is installed in the flow at an angle that is the complimentary angle of the blades. The sum of these two acute angles is 90°.
Output can be increased by adding blades along the axle instead of increasing the length of the blades, as required with other turbines. This feature makes it more compact for portability and easier installation and maintenance,
This is an undershot turbine but it does not have the turbulence problem because the blades enter parallel to the flow and then rotate into 90° of the flow. Because power is created at the tip of the blades, the invention has an easy adjustment for raising or lowering the axle so that rotational speed can be maximized for the available flow rate. Lowering the axle floods the blades and slows the rotation. There is no lag problem from idle blades because they are out of the water until they move into the forward thrust position. The present turbine is more efficient than the Poncelet turbine that uses the flow only once and then exhausts it back to the stream. In the present turbine the blades exhaust the flow to the next blade in the rotation to extract more energy before returning the flow to the stream. This use of exhaust is shown in
This is primarily an impulse turbine, as defined in Newton's second law.
The sluice embodiment in
In the test, each blade cluster (28) had 4 quadrant blades. There were six clusters (30) in the test, but more clusters can be added (22) to increase the output. Longer blades can be used for more output. It is smaller and quieter than other turbines.
The preferred embodiment shown in
The axle, left support, connecting board/handle, and right support (10, 12, 14, and 16) can be made of material that resists rot, such as pressurized wood, aluminum, or plastic. The test model used pressurized wood and aluminum. The test turbine was made with a hand saw, a hand drill and bits, and a screw driver. The blades shown were made from repurposed pizza pans. The 5% curve at the blade tip reduced tip leakage to extract more power from the flow. The curve also helps exhaust the flow to the next blade. As will be seen in
When the blade in the idle 12 o'clock position (54), it is out of the water, so it is not subject to lag like the Darrieus-type turbines. In the 3 o'clock position (56), it enters parallel to the flow so there is no turbulence. As the 3 o'clock blade rotates toward the bottom 6 o'clock position, the flow splits with some of the flow in front of the blade and some in back (65). This flow split causes an impulse force on the front of the blade and a reaction lift force on the curve of the back of the blade. Both of these forces are positive so there is no lag effect. The sloping angle of the blade in the 3 o'clock position exhausts the flow (72) to the next blade (50) in the 6 o'clock position. Using the blade exhaust makes this invention more efficient than the Poncelet undershot turbine, which uses the flow only on one blade. The blade in the 6 o'clock position will receive the 90° flow thrust (60, 62, and 68). As the 6 o'clock blade rotates it will exhaust to the blade in the 9 o'clock position (74). The direct and the exhaust flow put a force on over 50% of the blade surfaces. The set screw (58) enables easy assembly and quick replacement of a blade. The slot (59) is cut into the axle at the specified acute blade-to-axle angle. The rotation of the test model was counter-clockwise but it can be clockwise if the attached machine requires it.
Said hydro turbine has been tested successfully in a creek where the flow rate was reported by the USGS.
Alternative EmbodimentMounting the turbine on an anchored barge with a keel maintains the angle of the flow on the axle and the proper blade depth. It is more portable because it does not require digging a sluice. Its disadvantages include: it must be pulled ashore for maintenance and charging batteries, it cannot be camouflaged easily, electrical systems must be waterproofed, and it is vulnerable to floating logs and boats at night.
Second Embodiment, Wind TurbineWithout any modifications, said turbine tested successfully in a horizontal position on land using a variable speed fan, a digital anemometer, and a digital tachometer. As a wind turbine it could be used when there is wind but no water flow. Its portability makes it easy to install. It can be put on a hill, the top of a building, or a platform with a vane to function like a weather vane to keep the flow at the designed flow angle. In contrast, the installation of a propeller wind turbine requires a tall pole that is higher than the length of a blade, which makes installation and maintenance expensive. Because the flow strikes the blades at 90°, this invention's efficiency exceeds the Betz limit of 59.26%. The test model reached 70%.
Alternative EmbodimentThis turbine can be used as a vertical wind turbine so long as the flow is at the designed angle. The test model worked with the turbine upright at 45° into the flow.
AdvantagesAccordingly, the undershot double acute angle turbine has several advantages of one or more aspects, as follows: it operates with a low head, it does not require a dam or weir, its flows strike blades at 90° for maximum thrust without the Betz efficiency limit, its portability permits moving it to optimal points in a sluice or a stream, its portability enables moving for nomadic cultures and away from political strife, it can be used as a hydro or a wind turbine, it can be made from repurposed materials using hand tools, and its output can be increased easily by adding blade clusters or by increasing the length of the blades. Its design simplicity makes it easy to scale up for larger installations where more traditional designs are being considered. Other advantages of one or more aspects will be apparent from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing description.
Accordingly, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention herein described are merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the invention. Reference herein to details of the illustrated embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of the claims, which themselves recite those features regarded as essential to the invention.
Claims
1. An undershot turbine for converting a linear fluid flow into radial power, comprising:
- a) a plurality of end plates;
- b) a plurality of bearings mounted to the end plates at an adjustable height set by a mechanism for raising and lowering;
- c) an axle having a rotational axis, rotatably supported by the bearings; and
- d) a plurality of blades set into the axle at an acute angle relative to the rotational axis of the axle.
2. The turbine of claim 1, further comprising at least one connecting board supporting the plurality of end plates.
3. The turbine of claim 2, further comprising at least one flow indicator on the at least one connecting boards for showing a required flow direction and a required angle of the flow, wherein said flow angle is complimentary to the acute angle of the blades.
4. The turbine of claim 1, in which the fluid is a liquid.
5. The turbine of claim 4, in which the liquid is water.
6. The turbine of claim 1, in which the fluid is air.
7. The turbine of claim 1, further comprising a sluice for guiding the flow of fluid across the turbine at flow angle which is complimentary to the acute angle of the blades.
8. The turbine of claim 1, in which the each of the end plates has a slot for adjustably mounting the bearings, and the mechanism for raising and lowering comprises:
- a) a mounting block supporting a bearing;
- b) a plurality of threaded fasteners passing through the mounting block and the slot in the end plate; and
- c) a tightener threaded to each of the threaded fasteners on an opposite side of the end plate from the mounting block.
Type: Application
Filed: Mar 30, 2016
Publication Date: Jul 21, 2016
Inventor: George David Hughes (Chapel Hill, NC)
Application Number: 15/085,425