ADAPTIVE PROFILE SWITCHING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEDIA STREAMING OVER IP NETWORKS

A system for adaptively streaming video content over an IP network, comprising devices and non-transitory computer-readable storage media having executable computer modules, comprising a sender device interacting with the network, the device configured to send a video stream to the network and to receive a recovery packet stream from the network; at least one receiving device configured to receive the at least one video stream from the network and to transmit a respective recovery packet stream back to the sender device through the network; a bandwidth probe configured to be periodically sent with the video stream to the at least one receiving device to determine respective instantaneous network bandwidths; at least one profile configured to be chosen by the sender device to generate the video stream, based upon respective instantaneous network bandwidths, wherein the video stream is adaptively changed, based upon instantaneous network bandwidths and the respective recovery packet stream.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/030,630, filed 30 Jul. 2014, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the current invention are related to media streaming and particularly to a system and method to optimize media streaming over one or more IP networks.

In the specification and claims which follow, the expression “media streaming” or “streaming” is intended to mean the transfer of video information (and any associated audio information, if applicable), as known in the art, typically from one or more of servers to a plurality of devices (typically called “clients”) located at a distance from the respective servers. As such, terms such as “video content”, “content”, and “media stream” (or abbreviated “stream”) are used interchangeably in the specification and claims which follow hereinbelow to mean video content which is streamed. Typically, a stream comprises a plurality of “packets”, as known in the art and described further hereinbelow.

Other terms used in the specification hereinbelow, which are known in the art, include:

    • “Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)” is intended to mean a working group of experts, formed by ISO and IEC to set standards for audio and video compression and transmission;
    • “MPEG transport stream (TS)” is intended to mean a standard format for transmission and storage of audio, video, and program and system information protocol (PSIP) data. Transport Stream is specified in MPEG-2 Part 1, Systems (formally known as ISO/IEC standard 13818-1 or ITU-T Rec. H.222.0);
    • “TS Packet” is intended to mean the basic unit of data in a transport stream. “Program Clock Reference (PCR)” is intended to mean a value transmitted in the adaptation field of an MPEG-2 transport stream packet. PCR, when properly used, is used to generate a system_timing_clock in a decoder to present synchronized content, such as audio tracks matching the associated video, at least once each 100 ms;
    • “Presentation timestamp (PTS)” is intended to mean a timestamp metadata field in an MPEG transport stream or MPEG program stream that is used to achieve synchronization of programs separate elementary streams (i.e., video, audio, subtitles). Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentation_timestamp#cite_note-teknotes-1
    • “Group of Pictures (GOP)” has an intended meaning of a group of pictures, or GOP structure in video coding, (ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_compression#Video) and specifies the order in which intra- and inter-frames are arranged. GOP is a group of successive pictures within a coded video stream. Each coded video stream consists of successive GOPs. Visible frames are generated from the pictures contained in GOP;
    • “Packetized Elementary Stream (PES)” is intended to mean a specification in the MPEG-2 Part 1 (Systems) (ISO/IEC 13818-1) and ITU-T H.222.0 that defines carrying elementary streams (usually the output of an audio or video encoder) in packets within MPEG program stream and MPEG TS. The elementary stream is packetized by encapsulating sequential data bytes from the elementary stream inside PES packet headers. “Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP)” is intended to mean a standardized packet format for delivering audio and video over IP networks. RTP is used extensively in communication and entertainment systems that involve streaming media, such as telephony, video teleconference applications, television services and web-based push-to-talk features. RTP is used in conjunction with the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP). While RTP carries media streams, RTCP is used to monitor transmission statistics and quality of service (QoS) and aids synchronization of multiple streams. RTP is originated and received on even port numbers and the associated RTCP communication uses the next higher odd port number. RTP was developed by the Audio-Video Transport Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and first published in 1996 as RFC 1889, superseded by RFC 3550 in 2003;
    • “User Datagram Protocol (UDP)” is intended to mean one of the core members of the Internet Protocol Suite, the set of network protocols used for the Internet. With UDP, computer applications can send messages, in this case referred to as datagrams, to other hosts on an IP network without requiring prior communications to set up special transmission channels or data paths. UDP uses a simple transmission model without implicit handshaking dialogues for providing reliability, ordering, or data integrity. Thus, UDP provides an unreliable service and datagrams may arrive out of order, appear duplicated, or go missing without notice. UDP assumes that error checking and correction is either not necessary or performed in the application, avoiding the overhead of such processing at the network interface level.
    • “Forward Error Correction (FEC)”is intended to mean a technique to recover partial or full, packet information based on calculation made on the information. FEC may be effected by means of XOR between packets or another mathematical computation;
    • “Pro-MPEG” is intended to mean Professional-MPEG Forum—an association of broadcasters, program makers, equipment manufacturers, and component suppliers with interests in realizing the interoperability of professional television equipment, according to the implementation requirements of broadcasters and other end-users;
    • “SMPTE 2022” is intended to mean an FEC standard for video transport, initially developed by Pro-MPEG Forum and added to by the Video Services Forum, and describes both a FEC scheme and a way to transport constant bit rate video over IP networks.

Media streaming over switching IP networks such as fiber, leased line, CDN, public IP, wireless data networks, VSAT, and cellular networks is a challenging technical problem. A media stream may be impacted by a number of network aberrations (ex: packet loss, jitter, disorder, and capacity changes, inter alia) that make it difficult to sustain a constant stream from sender to receiver. In parallel to data connectivity growing worldwide, clients want to be able to receive media content to their devices (mobile phones, tablets, TV, PC and similar playing devices) with the best quality and the shortest delay.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 1, which is a prior art block diagram of a media server 15 (also referred to as a “media sending device” or a “sender” hereinbelow and in the claims which follow) connected with a plurality of receiving devices 20 (i.e., mobile devices, smart TVs, inter alia) over a plurality of networks 25 (i.e., mobile and wireless networks, inter alia). Each network and/or device may experience different network impairments and network capacities. For example, a cellular network may be more prone to capacity problems while a wireless network is more prone to packet loss.

There are three main approaches known in the art which address the problem of media streaming over switching IP networks, as described hereinbelow.

  • 1. Well managed networks, have UDP/RTP and redundant protection information in the form of forward error correction (FEC), which is sent with the media stream and consumes 30-50% extra bandwidth in one direction. This solution has a low time delay; however it may not tolerate high packet loss nor network capacity drop-off.
  • 2. For small scale operation, streaming with retransmission protection, also called Automatic Repeat-reQuest (ARQ) may be used. However ARQ is not useful for large-scale operations. ARQ has modest time delays, it may tolerate high packet loss, but it cannot tolerate network capacity drop.
  • 3. For large distribution over multiple networks, HTTP adaptive bit rate (HTTP ABR) streaming has become a de facto standard for most over-the-top systems. ABR has a large time delay. Packet loss and network capacity drops are managed by reducing bit rate to a lower value—inferring large time delays.

Each of the three main approaches listed above is addressed hereinbelow:

UDP/RTP

Media streaming with UDP/RTP is not suited for mobile or mass distribution application as these larger-scale networks are not considered “managed”.

ARQ

Another solution, ARQ, is currently offered by several vendors to address 100% recovery of lost packets. ARQ has been found to offer superior performance at lower overhead compared with existing packet loss recovery solutions.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 2, which a prior art block diagram, similar to that of FIG. 1, showing an ARQ configuration of media streaming based on a method called protection streaming, having a sender 35, connected with a plurality of ARQ receiving devices 40 (also referred to hereinbelow individually as “ARQ receiver”) over a plurality of networks 45 (indicated as Network 1, . . . Network N−1, Network N in the figure), with a respective receiver being fed from a respective network.

Protection streaming performed with the configuration shown in FIG. 2 allows each receiver to be addressed differently, thus allowing for precise packet recovery to be applied to each receiver.

Prior art ARQ systems work with a sender sending/transmitting UDP/RTP packets in a stream over an unmanaged IP-based packet network to several receivers. Packet loss detected by a receiver is reported to the sender using special RTCP messages. Each message may contain one or more different requests. The ARQ packet processing is effective when network capacity is larger than that of the initial media stream bandwidth. As noted previously, the ARQ process allows for packet recovery with retransmission of lost packets. However if the network capacity (i.e. maximum bandwidth available for the network) drops below that of the media stream bandwidth, the ARQ method (i.e. protection streaming) cannot effectively recover lost packets.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 3, which is a prior art flow and block diagram showing an exemplary video stream 50 from a sender 52 to an ARQ receiver 65 and a loss of several packets 55 (indicated as D2, D6, D8, and D9) and subsequent respective request packets 60 (indicated as R2, R6, R8-9.) In general, a receiver requests resending packets several times during a time window in which a packet is in a receiver buffer (not show in figure). In the figure, sender 52 processes the receiver's request packets (R2, R6, R8-9) and sends respective recovery packets 62 (D3, D5, D10) back to the receiver on the main content stream (indicated by the arrows connecting the sender with the receiver).

A major shortcoming of such an ARQ system is that sometimes the IP link (i.e. the bandwidth between the sender and the receiver) may reach its capacity limit due to either a physical connection (ex: ADSL/VDSL) or by a capacity limit provided by the service provider (ex: a mobile network provider). As shown in FIG. 3, ARQ systems can send a burst of recovery packets in response to a burst of packet loss requests. The burst of recovery packets may block or interfere with the stream's packet flow, causing additional lost packets.

Some ARQ systems limit the link by employing traffic shaping as known in the art. Traffic shaping can act to impact both the stream and the recovery packets by limiting bandwidth, effectively not addressing situations where recovery packets may block the media stream.

HTTP ABR

Prior art HTTP ABR (HTTP adaptive bit rate) systems use a method which employs several encoding profiles of the same video content, which is split into segments using dedicated logic. The term “profile” (as in “encoding profile”, for example) is intended to mean in the specification and claims which follow hereinbelow encoder settings for streaming, as known in the art. Included in a profile are: encoding method, resolution, bitrate, and additional information.

An original media stream is encoded in several profiles; each media stream is then split to segments. A segment is a portion of video pictures or frames and in most cases is in a GOP (group of pictures) boundary. Data relevant to respective segment bitrate and location are published to a client. The client then decides which segment to download; each segment having a predefined bitrate. The client may download several consecutive segments and use a specific algorithm to determine the order of successive segments. (One example of a specific algorithm could be that based on time-to-download a segment.)

The use of several segments requires a larger buffer (having a size of at least 2-3 segments), which yields a larger time delay for media streaming. The bitrate for respective profiles is fixed at the origin point, as known in the art, and the client must decide which segment to take from respective profiles. The entire media streaming process is time consuming (due to the need to buffer the segments).

Most ABR solutions employ HTTP protocol as the signaling and data transfer protocol. HTTP protocol is used to initiate the connection between client and server and use the HTTP tunneling capability to pass public internet and firewalls. HTTP adaptive streaming is widely adapted to tackle network aberrations and capacity changes. Several standards have been developed which differ from one another by signaling method or by underlining encoding, having a similar functionality. The underlying TCP protocol is very susceptible to network impairments such as packet loss and jitter.

Prior art solutions do not optimize available bitrate nor do they effectively overcome network-related inconsistencies, such as packet loss and bandwidth fluctuations.

ABR employs a scheme of several profiles to represent the same media source. The clients downloads a section of the media and if the operation is halted or stalled due to network aberrations or due to a capacity drop, a smaller size profile of that same media section is downloaded to try to overcome the problem. Profiles are prepared in advance to ‘guestimate’ which bitrates are more likely to pass through the network to allow the client to switch between one profile and another. The client must ensure sufficient buffer time to allow switching between profiles, storing several profiles, and to then play them out.

As noted hereinabove, high buffering requirements and time delays are experienced between the original media source and the output to the client. Most client solutions do not include an attempt to recover packet loss or to overcome large delays, as these issues are related to limitations of TCP protocol. Generally, lowering bitrate profiles infers a lower likelihood of suffering from packet loss or capacity problems.

Another limitation of such methods is that link capacity cannot be fully utilized. This is because as a profile segment is downloaded and the client has little information on the real link capacity/potential, the only way to switch to a higher capacity profile is by trial-and-error. Studies have shown that, on average, effective ABR tends to use only 50-60% of available network capacity, as higher utilization of network capacity yields packet loss. Standards in use may be HTTP Live Streaming (HLS), Adobe HTTP Dynamic Streaming (HDS), Microsoft Smooth Streaming and MPEG-DASH—all as known in the art, ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_bitrate_streaming.

Workflow Prior Art

An input video feed is encoded by a multi profile encoder, which creates several profiles of the video stream. Each profile may have a different encoding bit rate and video resolution. Most techniques employ either: open a group of pictures (GOP; having no definite number of frames), or; a closed GOP (fixed number of frames per GOP)—all as known in the art.

Profiles are packaged and segmented into blocks. Blocks are documented in a manifest/playlist list. Respective block information is published with its properties and location (bitrate and resolution)—as known in the art. Profiles are stored in HTTP servers and may be downloaded by a remote client based on the information in a manifest/playlist.

Every client is responsible to pull (download) segments to its local memory/buffer and to assure a full segment download. For this purpose, the client monitors each new segment download. As a download is performed over HTTP, the download is susceptible to packet loss and to network jitter, which may contribute to increase segment download time. This is because the TCP protocol—which is the heart of the HTTP—contributes a time delay until all the data has been downloaded.

During a download, the client can sense download speed and/or a network artifact adversely impacting the download. The client can decide to stop the current download and/or to select a different profile for the current or the next segment download. This approach assures a continuous download of segments, with each adaptive client using at least a triple-buffer approach to buffer several consecutive segments.

For segment N, the buffer will be constructed as:

    • Segment (N−2)—waiting to be played;
    • Segment (N−1)—last downloaded; and
    • partial Segment (N)—downloaded.

For each standard (HLS-HDS, SMOOTH, etc.), a client should determine the amount of buffering and segments stored prior to play out. A common practice in the art is to allocate sufficient buffering to store at least 3 segments. However, most solutions tend to have more buffering capacity than 3 segments to allow switching the last downloaded profile with a lower resolution in case of streaming problems.

As several full segments are downloaded, the client starts to read the stream in an orderly fashion, as the segments are GOP-aligned (based upon a start and stop of the GOP boundary). This approach allows seamless stitching of the stream and smooth decoding, as known in the art.

Most multi-profile solutions known in the art do not maintain the same resolution across different profiles nor is it mandatory to keep the same GOP structure. Most solutions tend to use MPEG2 transport for profiles and have PCR/PTS/DTS information. Most solutions have adopted the H.264 encoding standard. Some multi-profile solutions have adopted newer encoding options such as H.265, with the condition that encoding remains the same between profiles. A profile may share a common PCR counter to sync DTS and PTS.

Because an adaptive streaming viewing experience may be different from one vendor and another, or from one location to another, adaptive streaming does not provide the same viewing experience characteristic of linear/conventional TV, which gives all viewers the same delay and viewing experience.

There is therefore a need to have a media streaming system that can operate over challenging network impairments, and which can provide the highest media bandwidth and shortest time delay to the receiver.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the teachings of the present invention there is provided a system for adaptively streaming video content over an IP network, comprising devices and non-transitory computer-readable storage media having executable computer modules, comprising: a sender device interacting with the network, the device configured to send a video stream to the network and to receive a recovery packet stream from the network; at least one receiving device configured to receive the at least one video stream from the network and to transmit a respective recovery packet stream back to the sender device through the network; a bandwidth probe configured to be periodically sent with the video stream to the at least one receiving device to determine respective instantaneous network bandwidths; at least one profile configured to be chosen by the sender device to generate the video stream, based upon respective instantaneous network bandwidths; wherein the video stream is adaptively changed, based upon instantaneous network bandwidths and the respective recovery packet stream.

According to the teachings of the present invention there is further provided a computer-implemented method for adaptively streaming video content over an IP network, comprising the steps of sending at least one video stream from a sender device to the network; receiving the at least one video stream from the network by at least one receiving device and the at least one receiving device transmitting a respective recovery packet stream back to the sender device through the network; periodically sending a bandwidth probe with the video stream to the at least one receiving device to determine respective instantaneous network bandwidths; choosing at least one profile by the sender device to generate the at least one video stream based upon respective instantaneous network bandwidths; whereby the video stream is adaptively changed, based upon instantaneous network bandwidths and the respective recovery packet stream.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a prior art block diagram of a media server connected with a plurality of receiving devices over a plurality of networks;

FIG. 2 is prior art block diagram, similar to that of FIG. 1, showing an ARQ configuration of media streaming based on a method called protection streaming, having a sender, connected with a plurality of ARQ receiving devices, with a respective receiver being fed from a respective network;

FIG. 3 is a prior art flow and block diagram showing an exemplary stream from a sender an ARQ receiver and a loss of several packets and subsequent respective request packets;

FIG. 4 is schematic process diagram showing the use of five profiles and a local storage to switch between the profiles to form a single video stream, in accordance with embodiments of the current invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic process block diagram similar to FIG. 4, illustrating the use of five profiles and using a local storage switching between the profiles to form two exemplary streams, in accordance with embodiments of the current invention;

FIG. 6 is a schematic process block diagram of a sender device and its interaction with a common packet buffer pointer pool, a bi-directional network interface, and a stream generator, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic process block diagram detailing elements/functions of the stream generator FIG. 6, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 8 is a schematic process block diagram detailing elements/functions of the sender device of FIG. 6, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 9 is a flowchart indicating a rate probe decision flow, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 10 is a process flowchart showing a backoff decision flow, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of an array mapping algorithm, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 12 is a flowchart indicating a process of reading request entries, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 13 is a flowchart showing a controlled adaptive rate decision process to increase bitrate, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 14 is flowchart indicating a manifest reading the general profile selection process in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 15 is stream rate versus time schematic diagram showing a stream rate axis and a time axis, an initial media stream, network bandwidth capacities, probes tests, and resultant profile media stream adjustments (i.e. “stream rates”), in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 16 is a schematic time versus stream rate “snapshot”, showing how profile change impacts stream bandwidth, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention;

FIG. 17 is a schematic process block diagram of a receiver device (also “ARQ client”), in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention; and

FIG. 18 is a schematic block diagram of a media flow from a server to a plurality of ARQ clients, showing the main process blocks involved in the media process, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the current invention include a novel solution to distribute media content to various receivers in parallel over a plurality of networks and impairments. Embodiments of the current invention address the need for high bitrate delivery while providing low time delay and error correction handling capability. Embodiments of the current invention address limitations of the prior art solutions noted hereinabove.

An embodiment of the current invention uses adaptive profile switching and protected ARQ over UDP protocol to adapt stream rate to network condition for each client (i.e., recipient). The solution is based on a combination of addressing both stream impairments and link capacity.

The solution, as described in detail hereinbelow, is based on the following techniques:

    • ARQ UDP streaming to recover any packet;
    • ARQ recovery packet rate limitation;
    • calculation of the stream health based on ARQ request numbers;
    • profile switching capability; and
    • network probing capability.

The underlying protocol used in embodiments of the current invention is UDP, which is considered unreliable but is faster compared to TCP for streaming applications. To accommodate for UDP unreliable delivery characteristics, embodiments of the current invention employ Real Time Protocol (RTP) and packet recovery with ARQ. This approach yields results as reliable as those using the TCP protocol but with higher bitrate utilization.

Embodiments of the current invention further address another aspect of network behavior, namely capacity/bandwidth changes. An IP network (i.e., public internet, metro internet, home wireless network, and cellular network) may change its capacity from time to time due to network element failure, over subscription, and congestion, inter alia. Capacity changes express themselves as changes to the available capacity available to respective users at a given time. As noted hereinabove, bandwidth drop/decrease causes packet loss in cases where the media stream is higher than given link/network capacity. One embodiment of the current invention includes detection and reaction to bandwidth change; to recover packet loss during a bandwidth drop and to reduce the stream bitrate, so that the new bit rate will be lower than an initial bandwidth.

Another embodiment of the current invention includes a solution to detect when conditions are favorable to increase stream bit rate. The solution incorporates sophisticated network bandwidth probing along with ARQ to determine a new bit rate to be used. This capability allows utilizing 80-90% of the available network capacity, which is nearly a 50% increase over adaptive streaming and which additionally yields increased picture quality (as increased media bitrate infers higher video quality and resolution).

Embodiments of the present invention include profile switching on the sender side, thereby eliminating the need to buffer several segments (as is done using ABR). The technique of profile switching on the sender side serves to reduce receiver buffering requirements and yields a smaller time delay, in comparison to linear TV.

The decision processes related to profile switching are salient aspects of embodiments of the current invention. For each client, a specific streamer is created and maintained to be responsible for pulling a “current” profile from a local storage device and pushing (or “streaming”) it to the client. The streamer maintains a list that keeps track of packet sequence numbers and the source profile sequence number for retransmission.

Embodiments noted hereinabove are discussed in detail in the figures which follow.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 4, which is a schematic diagram showing the use of five profiles (Profiles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and a local storage 80 to switch between the profiles to form a single video stream 84, in accordance with embodiments of the current invention. Seven exemplary, respective GOP's (GOP1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) are created upon reception of the initial stream (not shown in the figure) for each profile, as shown. Creation of the respective GOP's includes creating a segmentation list, which includes the GOP number, and respective RTP sequence start and stop numbers for each GOP. (Segmentation lists are not shown in the figure.) Note that whereas five exemplary profiles are shown in the current figure, the number of profiles used in embodiments of the current invention may be less, but is typically much more than five.

Upon a request to change to a new profile, a stream encapsulator 88 (also referred to as “streamer” hereinbelow) reads current profile packets from respective profiles and switches to a new profile, creating video stream 84, which is sent to the client (not shown in the figure). Exemplary video stream 84 is shown schematically including GOP's from the respective profiles.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 5, which is a schematic diagram similar to FIG. 4, illustrating the use of five profiles (Profiles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and using a local storage 80 switching between them to form two exemplary streams 150 and 152, in accordance with embodiments of the current invention. Apart from differences described below, local storage 80 and Profiles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are identical in notation, configuration, and functionality to that shown in FIG. 4, and elements indicated by the same reference numerals and/or letters are generally identical in configuration, operation, and functionality as described hereinabove. In the figure, there are two streamers 90 and 92, which function similarly to streamer 88 of FIG. 4. Streamers 90 and 92 serve to create streams 94 and 96, respectively.

Other embodiments of the current invention include a limitation on the recovery packet stream (refer to recovery packets 62 and video stream 50 of FIG. 3). The streamers interact with clients (clients are not shown in the figure, but are part of “network” indicated in the figure) to recover any lost packet(s) by means of retransmission of the lost packet back to the client. The streamers work to limit a recovery packet stream by giving priority to the video stream over the recovery packet stream. Recovery packets are organized in a priority queue, according to their presentation time.

The term “protection potential”, as used in the specification and claims which follow, is intended to mean a statistic calculated from: the number of packets requested to be corrected, but currently waiting; plus the number of packets requested to be corrected and currently being addressed; plus the maximum correction index (which is a function of a predefined time delay and a rate limit—either hardware and or software limit of bandwidth). One example of the relationship of protection potential versus protection threshold is if the protection potential is higher than a protection threshold, then a lower profile (lower bit rate) that meets a new bandwidth is selected for the next segment transmission.

Another embodiment of the current invention includes network bandwidth probing; employing ARQ protection and protection statistics to determine network capacity—another term intended to have the same meaning as “network bandwidth”. As described further hereinbelow, a bandwidth probe and a pre-defined bandwidth step are sent from time to time with the media stream to each client. If the packet loss is lower than a defined packet loss threshold, then an algorithm determines a network bandwidth which may allow more data to be sent.

It is noted that whereas two exemplary streams are shown in FIG. 5, the number of streams applicable in embodiments of the current invention is typically much more than two. Likewise, although five exemplary profiles are shown in the current figure, the number of profiles used in embodiments of the current invention may be less, but is typically much more than five.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 6, which is a schematic process block diagram of a sender device 105 and its interaction with a common packet buffer pointer pool 110, a network interface 112, and a stream generator 114, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Arrows in the figure connecting exemplary Profiles 1, 2, 3, and 4 to a common packet buffer pointer pool 110 and to stream generator 114 represent respective video streams. Segmentation is performed in common packet buffer pointer pool 110, as described hereinbelow. Note that whereas four exemplary profiles are shown in the current figure, the number of profiles used in embodiments of the current invention may be less, but is typically much more than four.

A bidirectional Network interface 112 is assigned for each streamer and the network interface includes a means to support unicast/multicast/VPN connection types: For VPN (Virtual Private Network), any type of VPN may be used, as long as it is capable of supporting UDP/RTP traffic, bi directional communication, stream encryption, and retransmission of packets. The VPN may also support unicast/multicast. Embodiments of the present invention are not limited to one type of VPN technology, as it may be adapted to VPNs like Generic routing encapsulation, IPSEC, OPENVPN, HTTP tunneling any many other similar solutions known in the art.

On the transmitting side the bidirectional Network interface 112 serves to receive a IP media stream, RTCP communication/control, and auxiliary packets internally forwarded to it and to send them through a predefined protocol (unicast/multicast/VPN) to the client.

On the receiving side the bidirectional Network interface serves to accept traffic from a unicast/multicast/VPN source and to convert standard IP packets. The packets are them forwarded to their designated blocks (RTCP, Auxiliary; NTP, DNS and similar services). In most SW/HW implementations a common memory space is reserved to hold incoming and outgoing traffic.

For each input profile received by Common packet buffer pointer pool 110, a special segmentation process block in the common packet buffer pointer pool is assigned to inspect the stream and to issue a segmentation list (not shown in the figure). One skilled in the streaming field art will find this function to be similar to a packaging function of an adaptive bitrate packager, which maintains a manifest for each profile and GOP. The segmentation process block checks the media stream headers to detect the start of each new GOP and its time code. This GOP time code and number information is then stored in a manifest list associated to all the profiles. The outcome is a list with several GOP references for each profile representing the location of each GOP and GOP encoding alternatives versions. Each profile includes a sequential list of entries for easy data extraction, with each entry representing one media unit. Memory may be accessed by multiple clients to retrieve media packets for streaming or for recovery retransmission. Each packet is assigned a time/lifetime value. When the time/lifetime value is exceeded, old entries are released, allowing new media packets to be stored.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 7, which is a schematic process block diagram detailing elements/functions of stream generator 114 of FIG. 6, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Apart from differences described below, ABR client 114 and Profiles 1, 2, 3, and 4, Network interface, and Adaptive rate logic 124 are identical in notation, configuration, and functionality to that shown in FIG. 6, and elements indicated by the same reference numerals and/or letters are generally identical in configuration, operation, and functionality as described hereinabove.

ABR client 114 includes the functions of: a Profile selection 115; a Convert to fixed rate 116; a New RTP sequence number 118; and a new profile request 120. The discussion which follows is directed to a process of selecting and streaming different profiles to each client.

ABR client 114 serves to convert data read from the profile into a continuous RTP stream. As data may come from various streams, the ABR client process block stitches data from various streams together and encapsulates them into new RTP packets. The block is also responsible to document where data pieces came from (which profile and which physical location in the memory) for the purpose of fetching data in case a recovery request is made to a specific RTP packet. Following a profile switch, the current RTP packet is closed and sent, and a new RTP packet process starts. The process described hereinabove assures data in each RTP packet belongs to the same profile.

Profile Selection 115 has the role of fetching a new GOP/segment and streaming it after completion of the previous GOP. A decision as to which new GOP/Segment to read is based on a command from Adaptive rate logic 124. A new RTP request is received by New profile request 118 and the request is correlated to a current manifest list. A new profile is then selected and the information is transferred to fetch the next GOP in the new profile. Each new command includes the profile number and GOP location in the profile.

New RTP sequence number 118 is a process wherein new RTP sequence numbers are created and maintained for each client. The streamer converts media packets to RTP payload with a new sequence number, a time stamp, and all other necessary RTP header flags and fields. The streamer pushes the new stream to the “Output” stream to the Network Interface.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 8, which is a schematic process block diagram detailing elements/functions of sender device 105 of FIG. 6, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Apart from differences described below, sender device 105 and Network interface are identical in notation, configuration, and functionality to that shown in FIG. 6, and elements indicated by the same reference numerals and/or letters are generally identical in configuration, operation, and functionality as described hereinabove.

Sender device 105 includes the following process blocks: a rate limit FIFO 126; a prioritize array queue 128; a resend packet counter 130; an RTCP ARQ message receiver 132; a sliding window counter 133; an adaptive rate logic 134; and a rate probe 136—all of which are described further hereinbelow. Furthermore, sender device 105 receives recovery packets, a manifest list, and RTCP and outputs read recovery packets, profile selection, and video stream, as indicated in the figure.

Rate limit FIFO 126 receives recovery packets and serves to report the number of bits waiting to be transmitted for further processing and its interaction with other processes within sender device 105 is discussed further hereinbelow.

Prioritize array queue 128 serves to store incoming ARQ packet requests in a prioritize data base (based on a request sequence number). Requests are rearranged in a novel data base that maintains a small array of requests representing a sequence of requests or a single request. A request may be of a fixed size or of a range of values. Each individual request is split into two entries; request START (RS) and request END (RE) with the request value being identical. A range request is split to request START range to request END. When entries are inserted into the data base, they are organized once within the data base to create sub ranges. Two consecutive entries are read from the database, and based on flags in the message the requested packet is pulled from the stream buffer for retransmission. The two entries may signal a single packet readout (in the case where the sequence value is the same) or a range of packets. The packet signals rate limit FIFO 126 for its readiness to enter the FIFO data base. The packet then waits to for acknowledgment to enter or a ‘backoff’ signal to wait further.

Sliding window counter 133 receives a data flow from rate limit FIFO 126 and serves to monitor how many bits pass from the rate limit FIFO. The sliding window counter serves to calculate and store the number of bits sent during a period of one second.

The sliding window counter uses so-called “ticks”, Each tick can, for example, represent 10 ms, with each entry having a budget of bits that may be transmitted during that timeframe. A “window” can be defined, for example, as 100 ticks, namely 1 second. For each new tick, a predefined value is added and a value of actual transmitted bits is subtracted. As part of the monitoring function of how many bits pass from the rate limit FIFO, every time an old tick entry is cleared memory for a new entry is made available. The total value of the entries in the window in the description above is calculated for the total number of bits that passed during the last 100 ticks, i.e. last second.

It is noted that the value of a tick in embodiments of the current invention may be less or more than 10 ms, although tick values are typically significantly less than 1 second. Likewise, the value of 100 ticks to measure a total number of bits that have passed may be more or less; however a typical total time value of a plurality of ticks can range approximately from 0.5 to 2 seconds.

Data from Sliding window counter 133 gives an indication of the budget of how many recovery packets may be transmitted to the client during a given time, for example: one second.

Rate limit FIFO 126 serves to impose a first priority on the RTP media stream, with protection packets being constrained to a predefined pre-allocated bitrate. One aspect of embodiments of the current the invention is to overcome a fundamental constraint of an ARQ system, which typically causes extra packet loss in case of protection bursts and/or following requests. Rate limit FIFO 126 serves to not exceed allowed bitrates and acts to smooth recovery packet flow while keeping a fixed total bitrate. Keeping a constant and predefine bitrate is crucial for applications making use of limited capacity links such as ADSL/VDSL or satellite data links

The rate limit FIFO process takes use of data from sliding window counter 133 to allow IP packets to be transmitted on time every tick so that the transmitted number of bits does not exceed a predefined bandwidth allocation.

Rate limit FIFO 126 allows packets to be inserted to a data base if the data base is not full and to wait their turn for transmission, if the data base is full. If the data base is full, the rate limit FIFO process serves to issue a ‘backoff’ signal to halt transmitters from sending packets, until such time that the rate limit FIFO allows a new entry to be inserted.

Resend packet counter 130 serves to gather statistics from various process blocks to assess the protection potential (ref discussion of FIG. 5) status of the stream. Values gathered from Prioritize array queue 128, Rate limit FIFO 126, and the Sliding window counter processes serve to generate a value that is used by Adaptive rate logic 134 to decided which profile to select next, or to what Rate probe 136 action to take.

Stated schematically:


Protection Potential=(Stream buffer size+Sliding window)−(number of request in Priority queue+Number of Packets in Rate FIFO)

RTCP ARQ message receiver 132 serves to manage the RTCP messaging system between sender and receiver units. The RTCP protocol is a part of the RTP protocol which carries control information between sender and receiver, and is associated with each stream. RTCP messages carry control and other information between the sender and the receiver in accordance with the RTCP standard. The RTCP client is also responsible for sending packet request information in a specific format that in includes a missing packet sequence number range; start range-end range. Several such requests may be sent with one RTCP packet back to the sender.

Upon receiving a new request message, RTCP ARQ message receiver 132 passes the information to Priority array queue 128 for further processing.

Adaptive rate logic 134 serves to monitor events and statistics coming from various process blocks and to decide on the next profile selection and the Rate probe action. Adaptive rate logic 134 has three major functions:

1. Monitor statistics information and the protection potential value to decide on profile bitrate drop or profile bitrate increase;

2. Control Rate probe 136 process, while monitoring the impact of rate probe on the stream; and

3. Read the available manifest list to select next profile.

The Monitoring function of Adaptive rate logic 134 has two main tasks:

1. Monitor the protection potential to decrease the bitrate/profile; and

2. Monitor if the protection potential is a higher than a predefined protection potential threshold value and then to attempt to increase the bitrate/profile after a successful probe test.

The first task is simply monitor the ‘Protection Potential’ value, compared to a threshold, if the threshold is passed, then the Protection potential of the system is low and may not guaranty proper protection in the near future. Then select a low bitrate profile for next selection point. This monitoring is essential to maintain protection capability for the media stream, a capacity drop will translate to an increase of lost packets and increase of requests, the Protection Potential will decrease in correlation to the increase of request in process by the ARQ block. The system must maintain enough buffering to allow the drop to a new lower bit rate profile to overcome the capacity drop.

The second task is to attempt to probe the network to see if a higher profile may be in use, this action will test the network with a ‘dummy’ stream sent in parallel to the media stream simulating an increase of bandwidth (e.g. higher profile). If the operation is successful and minimal impact is seen on the protection potential, then a new profile may be selected to the next transition point.

Rate probe 136 serves to send a predefined stream of media packets to be added to the standard media stream to measure available bandwidth the media stream would experience if the rate had a higher bandwidth. Rate probe 136 accepts a command to start transmitting a ‘step’ of bit rate, the step defined as a percentage of the media stream, corresponding to a difference between the current stream profile and the next successive stream profile.

The stream in Rate probe 136 uses ‘dummy’ packets to create the basis to the stream used for bandwidth evaluation. The stream is transmitted between the Sender and the receiver for a fixed duration on time. Dummy packets are selected so that they don't interfere with the original media stream. Upon completion of the transmission, the rate probe process block waits for the next command to perform a probe test.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 9, which is a flowchart indicating a rate probe decision flow 145, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Rate probe decision flow 145 starts with Get rate to test 147 and continues with Calculate number of packets to send N 149. Then Send next dummy packet 151 is performed, followed by the test: Is number of packets sent <N?. If “yes” control is iterated back to send next dummy packet 151 and the number of packets is again compared with N. If “no”, meaning the number of packets is equal to or greater than N, rate probe decision flow 145 is complete.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 10, which is a process flowchart showing a backoff decision flow 160, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. The backoff decision flow process is performed upon receipt of a new error request (not shown in the figure). Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level 162 serves to read rate limit FIFO and the request queue occupancy level and clears the fail flag. A first decision is Is request queue occupied (i.e. full) and FIFO full? 164. If yes, control is transferred to Wait time cycle 166. If no, control is reverted back to Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level 162. After Wait time cycle 166 the fail flag is incremented in Increment fail flag 168, followed by Read rate limit FIFO and priority queue occupancy 170. Another decision is Is request queue occupied (i.e. full) and FIFO full? 172. If no, control is reverted back to Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level 162. If yes, another check is performed in Fail flag greater than number of attempts? 174. If no, control is reverted to Wait time cycle 166. If yes—meaning there currently is no “room” for additional recovery requests—then the priority queue is cleared in Clear priority queue 176, then Issue backoff signal 178, and Wait half for FIFO to reach the half full point 180, then control is reverted to Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level 162.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 11, which is a flowchart of an array mapping algorithm 180, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Array mapping algorithm starts with Wait for new request 182, followed by New request arrives 184. As described hereinabove (ref discussion of FIG. 8) a request is split into two entries; request START (RS) and request END (RE). In RS-RE contained in stream buffer range? 186, the two entries are compared. If no, then Drop request 190 and control is reverted to Wait for new request 182. If yes, Insert new entry and Mark Flags 188 and proceed to Sort array 192. Then control is reverted to Wait for new request 182.

In array mapping algorithm 180, if all of the entries in a range have been sent, pop the two entries and continue to read the next two. If there is a failure in the middle (i.e. failed to send a request to the rate limit block) update the entry to the last index and mark as ‘start’ flag and wait for approval to send again.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 12, which is a flowchart indicating a process of reading request entries 200, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Process of reading request entries 200 begins with Wait for array not empty 205. As long as the array is not empty, control is transferred to step 210, Request access to rate limit FIFO. The request is acknowledged and a decision Access Granted ? 215 is made. If yes, Read the last two entries 220. If no, control reverts to step 210, Request access to rate limit FIFO. After Read the last two entries 220, control is transferred to step 225 Try to send range between two entries to FIFO. Set range values. The next request, step 230 Send next request, is performed. Decision Send failed? 235 yields either no, whereupon control is reverted to step 230 Send next request, or yes, step 240 Replace last entry with current entry index and start flag. Step 245 Write back last entries to priority queue follows. Then control reverts to Wait for array not empty 205.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 13, which is a flowchart showing a controlled adaptive rate decision process 250 to adjust bitrate, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention.

Controlled adaptive rate decision process 250 includes a process for evaluating the action of a bitrate probe (ref FIGS. 8 and 9). If the action creates a number of requests (each request representing a lost packet) larger than a predefined maximum threshold value, the current bit rate may be too high for current network conditions and a lower bandwidth profile is advisable. If the action creates low amount of requests, i.e. lower than a predefined minimum threshold value, network conditions can most probably tolerate a higher bandwidth profile.

The overall data/process flow involves:

    • Read the rate limit FIFO and request queue occupancy levels to calculate the protection potential);
    • If the occupancy of either the request Queue or the Rate limit FIFO is full—start over, else;
    • Monitor the request queue over a predefined period of time. If during this time period the number of requests is higher that a predefined maximum request threshold; reduce current bitrate by selecting a lower profile and start over;
    • Else, if the number of requests during the time period is below a minimum request threshold; increase the bitrate by selecting a higher profile; and
    • Start over the process.

A full description of all the process steps of adaptive rate decision process 250 follows.

Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level 255 serves to read rate limit FIFO and the request queue occupancy level and clears the fail flag. A first decision is Is request queue occupied (i.e. full) and FIFO full? 258. If yes, control is transferred back to step 255 Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level. If no, a rate probe is sent in step 260 Send rate probe. Then step 262 Read request queue, set timer is performed. The question Is no. request>request maximum threshold? 264 is asked. If yes, the bitrate is reduced in step 266 Set bitrate to minimum video rate level and control is returned to Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level 255. If no, step 268 Time expired? checks total allocated time. If yes, the question Is no. request<request minimum threshold? 270 is asked. If no, control is reverted to step 262 Read request queue set timer.

If Is no. request<request minimum threshold? 270 is yes, then step 272 Increment bitrate and revert control to step 255 Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy level. If no, revert control to step 255 Read rate limit FIFO & request queue occupancy (without incrementing bitrate).

Reference is currently made to FIG. 14, which is a flowchart indicating a manifest reading the general profile selection process 280 in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Process 280 starts with step 282 Wait for new manifest list. Then the decision step 284 Manifest entry updated 284 is performed. In parallel, process 280 also starts in step 288 with Get starting profile. In step 290 Read profile, the profile is read. If the answer to step 284 is yes, then control is transferred to Read profile 290. If not, control is reverted back to step 282 Wait for new manifest list.

After the profile is read (step 290) the decision step 292 Is profile not maximum (bitrate) profile? is performed. If the answer is yes, control is reverted back to Read profile 290. If the answer is no, Send probe 294 is performed. Then the decision New bitrate change 296 is performed. If the answer is yes, Select next profile 298. If no, control is reverted back to step 288 with Get starting profile.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 15, which is a stream rate versus time schematic diagram 300 showing a stream rate axis 302 and a time axis 304, an initial media stream 310, network bandwidth capacities 315 and 316, probes tests 325, 335, 345, and 355, and resultant profile media stream adjustments (i.e. “stream rates”) 328 and 348, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. An Initial media stream 310 starts with a profile stream rate adjustment 328. As profile stream rate 328 is below network bandwidth capacity 315, the Adaptive rate logic process 134 (identified in FIG. 8) initiates a rate probe 325, which causes a packet loss 327 and a request 329 to send the packet loss back to the sender. (Packet requests are responded with ARQ retransmission packets). As rate probe 325 created lost events, the Controlled adaptive rate process waits a probe tick 320 to perform another probe test 335. There is another packet loss 337 and another request 338 to send it back to the sender. After another tick, network capacity 316 increases, and a probe test 345 is successful with no packet loss 347. The successful probe test causes Controlled adaptive rate process to select a new higher profile 348. Finally, after another probe tick, another probe test 355 is performed and another packet loss 357 occurs, and so on.

Because exemplary Network capacities 315 and 316 are representative of periodical probing, the expression “instantaneous network bandwidth” is used hereinbelow in the specification and in the claims to have the same meaning as “Network capacity” described hereinabove.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 16, which a schematic time versus stream rate “snapshot” 340, showing how profile change impacts stream bandwidth, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Apart from differences described below, stream rate axis 302 and time axis 304 are identical in notation and configuration to that shown in FIG. 15, and elements indicated by the same reference numerals and/or letters are generally identical in configuration, operation, and functionality as described hereinabove. Five exemplary profiles (Profile 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) having successively lower rates are shown with respective GOP's, over time. The exemplary stream for client 1 is shown schematically with the 5 GOP's that are associated with different profiles/different stream rates. Stream rates 362, 363,364, 365, and 366 are shown against stream rate axis 302 and time axis 304.

In the exemplary stream for client 1, profile switching from GOP N to GOP N+1 decreases the bandwidth; jumping to GOP N+2 lowering the bandwidth further. As capacity of the network may have picked up, the next step from GOP N+2 to N+3 to N+4 represents a profile bandwidth increase.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 17, which is a schematic process block diagram of a receiver device 361 (also called “ARQ client”), in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Receiver device 361 works with a media sender 382 (identified hereinbelow in FIG. 18) to receive media packets and recover lost packets, if such event occurs. In the case of packet disorder, the ARQ client uses an RTP sequence number to reorder packets to their original order, so that any packet disorder or late arrival due to retransmission is handled by the sequence number index to the data base. ARQ client 361 monitors the primary media stream and ‘dummy’ packets associated with the ‘network probe’ function (ref FIGS. 8, 13, 14, 15, inter alia). The ARQ client reports any loss event for a ‘dummy’ packet only once, while media packets are reported several times (according to a configuration of how may request to send per each loss event). A media stream enters the receiver device and Network interface 362, as shown in the figure, and another media stream exits the receiver device as shown, going to a video/audio decoder—not shown in the current figure.

A Network interface 362 is associated with each ARQ receiver. The network interface includes the means to support unicast/multicast/VPN connection types. For the VPN capability, any type of VPN may be used, as long as it is capable of supporting UDP/RTP traffic, bi directional communication and stream encryption. The VPN may also support unicast/multicast. Embodiments of the current invention are not limited to one type of VPN technology, as they may be adapted to VPNs such as Generic routing encapsulation, IPSEC, OPENVPN, and HTTP tunneling any many other similar solutions.

On the receiving side, Network interface 362 serves to accept traffic from a unicast/multicast/VPN source and to convert standard IP packets. The packet are then forwarded to their designated processes (i.e. to stream classification, RTCP and auxiliary; NTP, DNS and similar services).

On the transmitting side the Network interface receives an IP media stream, RTCP communication /control, and auxiliary packets internally forwarded to it and sent to it through a predefined protocol (unicast/multicast/VPN) to the destination.

In most software/hardware implementations a common memory space is reserved to hold incoming and outgoing traffic in the Network interface.

A Stream classification process 364 blocks any unwanted traffic and allows and redirects incoming packet for further processing. The stream classification process may be achieved in many ways: hash data base; allowed lis; inter alia. Stream classification process 364 accepts a pointer representing a link to the actual IP packet in memory. The pointer includes basic IP header parameters and an RTP header. Each IP packet pointer is inspected for its IPv4/IPv6 parameters and UDP source/destination port and redirection information is applied.

An RTP sequence packet inspector 366 monitors the progress of incoming RTP media packets pointers prior to their temporary storage in the pointer buffer. Each pointer RTP sequence number is extracted for inspection. A new pointer is inspected in the following steps:

    • 1. If the new sequence number is out of range of the buffer head and tail range, then drop the pointer and free its associated memory for that media packet;
    • 2. If the new sequence number is smaller than the previous sequence number then go to step 5 below;
    • 3. If the new sequence number is higher by 1 or more from the previous sequence number, push the packet into the buffer, update the previous sequence number to be the new sequence number and set flag ‘missing packet detected’;
    • 4. If ‘missing packet detected’ is set, send the sequence number notification to the missing packet detector process block;
    • 5. Test for wrap around. If wrap around is found set a wrap_around flag and go to step 3 above. Else drop the packet and free its associated memory for that media packet; and
    • 6. Clear temp flags and go to wait for new pointer.

A buffer process block 368 holds a sequential array of pointers based on 16 bits of the RTP sequence number, with each pointer entered according to the RTP packet sequence number. The buffer process maintains a head pointer signaling the last entry to buffer and a tail pointer the next pointer to read from the buffer (for POP operation). The difference between head and tail is the amount of packets in the buffer.

A missing packet detector 370 monitors and generates ARQ requests for missing packets. Each new ‘missing packet detected’ event is logged and assigned a test duration timer. The number of test periods is predefined and should not exceed the buffer delay. Each time a missing packet duration timer expires, a buffer inspection logic is invoked to examine if the packet did not arrive, as follows:

    • 1. If the packet request is missing, issue a new one and a new timer is set;
    • 2. Else, the operation stops.

For each new ‘missing packet detected’ event, the process also checks the sequence number neighbors to determine if they may also be missing, and then may generate a range of ‘requests’ for further processing. Each request is then assigned with a timer.

The buffer inspection is invoked for these two events:

    • 1. New ‘missing packet detected’ notification from the RTP sequence number inspector process block; and
    • 2. One of the timers expires.

For each packet request or range or request a message is sent to the RTCP ARQ message block for processing.

An RTCP ARQ message process 372 manages the RTCP messaging system between sender and receiver units. RTCP protocol is a part of the RTP protocol to carry control information between sender and receiver, and it is associated with each stream. RTCP messages carry control and other information between sender and the receiver in accordance to the RTCP standard, as known in the art. The RTCP client sends packet request information in a specific format that includes the stream, the missing packet sequence number range, and start range—end range. Several such requests may be sent with one RTCP packet back to the sender. Upon receiving a new request message from Missing packet detector 370, RTCP ARQ message process 372 generates an RTCP message which includes the request and any other requests pending. The message is transmitted to sender RTCP process block through network interface 362 to media server 382 for processing.

A Rate calculation process 374 keeps track of the number of packet pointers entering and departing the buffer, and calculates the bitrate based on timing information in the RTP packet or media internal timing information (such as PCR, if available in the media stream) or the average arrival of packets. The Rate calculation is then used by a Playout rate process 376 to read packets out to the destination receiver/player. The Playout rate process reads packets from the buffer and frees associated memory back to the SW/HW memory pool. Playout rate process 376 assures a fixed delay and constant packet readout to feed the receiver. Any packet that was has a null packet removal operation conducted on it is reconstructed back to its original state. The null packet is reinserted back to its original location within the IP packet.

Reference is currently made to FIG. 18, which is a schematic block diagram 380 of a media flow from a server 382 to a plurality of ARQ clients (indicated as 1, 2 . . . N−1, and N), showing the main process blocks involved in the media process, in accordance with an embodiment of the current invention. Server 382 includes: an ABR client 384 (which is equivalent to common buffer pool 110 of FIG. 6); exemplary Profiles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, a Common packet buffer pointer pool 386; a Stream generator 388 (equivalent to Stream generator 114 of FIG. 6); and Adaptive rate ARQ transmitters for respective clients 390 (equivalent to Sender device 105 of FIG. 6).

In embodiments of the current invention, the incoming media stream may come from plurality of sources. The incoming stream is encoded by the system to create several copies of the same content in various encoding profiles, received from an external encoder that streams different profiles simultaneously or from an existing HTTP adaptive server. If an HTTP adaptive server is used as a source, then embodiments of the current invention include simple adaptive client block 384 that communicates with the server and its manifest list and which reads all available profiles from the server. It is a straightforward solution for an adaptive client to read each profile as it becomes available, as known in the art. Media stream data is then passed to designated profile memory process block associated with each profile.

In another embodiment of the current invention, there is the capability to gather statistics on subscribers (i.e. clients) to optimize profiles according to existing network conditions. Information gathered for each client and the bitrate used by each client may further optimize an ABR system to allocate more adequate bitrate profiles to provide higher quality to the end user. An ABR encoding solution can serve to change the encoding bitrate profile to a new bitrate or to allocate new bit rate profiles to better fit in the bitrate range used by large clients groups to provide better visual quality.

The processes and/or process blocks described hereinabove are to be understood as generally residing on non-transitory computer-readable storage media having executable computer modules. The word “computer” used hereinabove and in the claims which follow is intended to mean any computing device, such as, but not limited to: a CPU; a personal computer; a server; and a mobile device, inter alia.

It will be appreciated that the above descriptions are intended only to serve as examples, and that many other embodiments are possible within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims

1.-2. (canceled)

3. A computer-implemented method using at least one profile for adaptively streaming video content over a public IP network, the method comprising the steps of:

using at least one stream generator to select at least one profile to send at least one video stream from a sender device to the network, the sender device employing User Datagram Protocol (UDP) over a connection chosen from the list including: unicast and VPN;
using a segmentation process to segment the at least one video stream associated with the at least one profile into a list of segments containing a GOP a group of pictures (GOP), to detect a start of the respective GOP, and to record a corresponding start time code;
operating a profile selection module, included in the at least one stream generator, to fetch respective groups of pictures (GOP) and to stream respective GOPs sequentially, based upon a command from an adaptive rate process module, to provide respective continuous RTP streams to the network;
receiving the at least one video stream from the network by at least one receiving Automatic Repeat-reQuest (ARQ) device, the network having an instantaneous network bandwidth for the at least one video stream, and the at least one ARQ receiving device transmitting a request for at least one recovery packet back to the sender device through the network upon at least one lost packet occurrence;
preparing to send a recovery packet stream by the sender device to the at least one ARQ receiving device in response to the request for at least one recovery packet;
limiting the recovery packet stream by the at least one stream generator, serving to give priority to the at least one video stream over the recovery packet stream, the at least one video stream having an initial media stream bandwidth;
periodically probing the instantaneous network bandwidth, employing ARQ protection of probing, to simulate an increase in the instantaneous network bandwidth by sending an expendable dummy packet stream in parallel to the least one video stream, the dummy packet stream sent from the sender device to the at least one receiving device to determine a resultant profile media stream bandwidth which yields a packet loss lower than a defined packet loss threshold;
calculating and monitoring a protection potential, the protection potential calculated from a number of packets requested to be corrected but currently waiting, a number of packets requested to be corrected and currently being addressed, and a maximum correction index characteristic of bandwidth limits;
comparing the protection potential to a protection threshold to determine a resultant profile media stream bandwidth; and
adjusting the initial media stream bandwidth, relative to the instantaneous network bandwidth and the protection potential, by reselecting at least one profile for the sender device to use for sending the at least one video stream over a connection chosen from the list including: unicast and VPN.

4.-5. (canceled)

6. The method of claim 3, whereby limiting the recovery packet stream is performed by a decision process that calculates a budget of recovery packets to be transmitted during a time period for the at least one video stream, the process serving to limit a rate of error recovery requests in the instantaneous network bandwidth.

7. The method of claim 6, whereby a backoff decision process is performed upon receipt of a new error request, the backoff decision process further including evaluation of an error request queue, the queue having at least one error request, regarding a number of error requests in the queue over time.

8. (canceled)

9. The method of claim 7, whereby the at least one stream generator interacts with the sender device and the adaptive rate process module, the adaptive process module serving to perform a rate probe of the instantaneous network bandwidth and to determine the resultant profile media stream bandwidth.

10. The method of claim 9, whereby network bandwidth probing is controlled by a rate probe process calculating a number of dummy packets in the dummy packet stream.

11. The method of claim 10, whereby the resultant profile media stream bandwidth has a value higher than the initial media stream bandwidth when there is no lost dummy packet occurrence.

12. The method of claim 10, whereby the resultant profile media stream bandwidth has a value lower than the initial media stream bandwidth when there is lost packet occurrence.

13. A system for adaptively streaming video content over a public IP network, comprising devices and non-transitory computer-readable storage media having executable computer modules, comprising:

a sender device interacting with the network, the sender device configured to send a video stream to the network using at least one profile selected by at least one stream generator, the sender device configured to use User Datagram Protocol (UDP) over a connection chosen from the list including: unicast and VPN;
a segmentation process module configured to segment the at least one video stream associated with the at least one profile into a list of segments containing a GOP a group of pictures (GOP), to detect a start of the respective GOP, and to record a corresponding start time code;
a profile selection module, included in the at least one stream generator configured to fetch respective groups of pictures (GOP) and to stream respective GOPs sequentially, based upon a command from an adaptive rate process module, to provide respective continuous RTP streams to the network;
at least one receiving Automatic Repeat-reQuest (ARQ) device configured to receive the at least one video stream from the network, the network having an instantaneous network bandwidth for the at least one video stream, and the at least one ARQ receiving device further configured to transmit a request for at least one recovery packet back to the sender device through the network upon at least one lost packet occurrence;
the at least one stream generator further configured to limit the recovery packet stream and to give priority to the at least one video stream over the recovery packet stream, the at least one video stream having an initial media stream bandwidth;
a rate probe configured to periodically probe the instantaneous network bandwidth, employing ARO protection of probing, to simulate an increase in the instantaneous network bandwidth by sending an expendable dummy packet stream in parallel to the least one video stream, the dummy packet stream configured to be sent from the sender device to the at least one receiving device to determine a resultant profile media stream bandwidth which yields a packet loss lower than a defined packet loss threshold;
a protection potential configured to be calculated and monitored, the protection potential calculated from a number of packets requested to be corrected but currently waiting, a number of packets requested to be corrected and currently being addressed, and a maximum correction index characteristic of bandwidth limits;
the protection potential further configured to be compared to a protection threshold to determine a resultant profile media stream bandwidth; and
the at least one stream generator, further configured to adjust the initial media stream bandwidth relative to the instantaneous network bandwidth and the protection potential, by reselecting at least one profile for the sender device to use for sending the at least one video stream over a connection chosen from the list including: unicast and VPN.

14.-15. (canceled)

16. The system of claim 13, wherein a decision process module is configured to limit the recovery packet stream in the instantaneous network bandwidth by a calculation of a budget of recovery packets to be transmitted during a time period for the at least one video stream.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein a backoff decision process module is configured to be operative upon receipt of a new error request, the backoff decision process module further configured to evaluate an error request queue, the queue having at least one error request, regarding a number of error requests in the queue over time.

18. (canceled)

19. The system of claim 17, wherein the at least one stream generator is further configured to interact with the sender device and the adaptive rate process module, the adaptive process module further configured to perform the rate probe of the instantaneous network bandwidth and to determine the resultant profile media stream bandwidth.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the rate probe is further configured to be controlled by a rate probe process module configured to calculate a number of dummy packets in the dummy packet stream.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein the resultant profile media stream bandwidth has a value higher than the initial media stream bandwidth when there is no lost dummy packet occurrence.

22. The system of claim 20, wherein the resultant profile media stream bandwidth has a value lower than the initial media stream bandwidth when there is lost packet occurrence.

Patent History
Publication number: 20170034589
Type: Application
Filed: Jul 30, 2015
Publication Date: Feb 2, 2017
Inventors: Adi ROZENBERG (Shoham), Limor Touriel (Matam)
Application Number: 14/813,369
Classifications
International Classification: H04N 21/647 (20060101); H04N 21/6373 (20060101); H04N 21/24 (20060101); H04N 21/643 (20060101);