METHOD FOR DETECTING AN ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC ANTIBODY AND REAGENT FOR USE THEREIN

Info

Publication number: 20210032302
Type: Application
Filed: Sep 23, 2020
Publication Date: Feb 4, 2021
Applicants: Junichiro FUTAMI (Okayama), Medinet Co., Ltd. (Kanagawa)
Inventors: Junichiro FUTAMI (Okayama), Kazuhiro KAKIMI (Tokyo), Ryuji MAEKAWA (Tokyo), Masato SHIRAKI (Kanagawa)
Application Number: 17/029,206

Abstract

A method for detecting an antigen-specific antibody detection reagent, which includes a cationized, denatured antigenic protein immobilized on a solid-phase surface of a carrier material, is provided. The cationized, denatured antigenic protein has cationized SH groups formed from reaction with a cationizing agent. The detection reagent is capable of specifically binding to an antigen-specific antibody which binds to an epitope of the antigenic protein. The method includes contacting a sample containing the antigen-specific antibody with the detection reagent to bind the antigen-specific antibody with the detection reagent. A labeled secondary antibody is then added to allow the labeled secondary antibody to bind to the antigen-specific antibody; and the detection reagent bound with the antigen-specific antibody is detected.

Description

Description

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/389,016, filed on Sep. 29, 2014; which is a U.S. national stage of international application PCT/JP2013/059692, filed on Mar. 29, 2013; which claims priority to Japanese patent application no. JP 2012-082735, filed on Mar. 30, 2012; the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND

The present application relates to a method for producing a reagent for antibody detection. The present application also relates to a reagent for antibody detection produced by the method and use thereof.

There exist a large number of methods for detecting antibodies contained in liquid samples, for example, radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISA is a method which involves: immobilizing particular antigens onto a microplate; after serial dilution of an antibody-containing sample, performing antigen-antibody reaction on the microplate; and detecting the bound antibody using an enzyme-labeled secondary antibody. This method requires evaluating antibody tests directed to individual antigens using separate assay plates.

As an approach for solving this problem, a multiplex technique has received attention, which can simultaneously analyze antibodies against diverse antigens by use of microbeads bearing reporter fluorescence as a carrier for immobilization.

In the application of any of these techniques, such diverse antigens must be prepared in water-soluble forms. Proteins of native structures that can be prepared in water-soluble forms or chemically synthesized polypeptide fragments have conventionally been used in most cases.

For example, a method for detecting an antibody contained in the blood of a cancer patient is described in Japanese Patent No. 3960614 (JP 3960614—Immunodia Co., Ltd.) or Japanese Patent Publication JP 2005-098877A (Hitachi Software Engineering Co., Ltd.). This method involves immobilizing an antigen epitope peptide (antigenic peptide composed of several amino acids) onto beads; contacting the beads with the blood components of a subject; and detecting antigen epitope peptide-specific antibody contained in the blood of the subject. The epitope portion to which the antibody binds, however, differs depending on the type of HLA. Use of the method described in JP 3960614 or JP 2005-098877A therefore requires clearing various conditions such as the examination of the HLA type of the subject and the identification of an epitope peptide appropriate for the HLA type of the subject.

For preparing a detection reagent for an antibody against a particular antigenic protein, the reagent to be prepared comprises all epitope portions derived from one type of antigenic protein on the surface of one type of bead and performs highly sensitive and stable detection. For this purpose, it is preferred to obtain an antigen having a water-soluble and flexible structure. Nonetheless, most of denatured proteins, poorly soluble proteins (e.g., membrane proteins), or proteins having unstable physical properties tend to aggregate. In this respect, partial peptides capable of exhibiting stable physical properties have conventionally been used in most cases.

Use of such partial peptides requires synthesizing diverse overlapping peptides for covering all epitopes and also requires preparing many types of beads. In addition, it is practically difficult to provide seamless epitope peptides. Even if a full-length antigen having a native structure can be obtained luckily, a general protein, which has a higher-order structure with a hydrophobic moiety buried in the interior, does not always expose its epitope to react with an antibody.

Even in a reagent for antibody detection prepared using solubilized proteins, thiol groups contained in the proteins might form a disulfide bond over time and thereby influence the antibody detection.

For example, Japanese Patent No. 3225468 (Dainabot Co., Ltd.) describes a method for detecting an anti-HCV antibody contained in the serum of a subject by use of the long-chain polypeptide of human hepatitis C virus (HCV). Japanese Patent No. 3225468 states that an intraprotein or interprotein disulfide bond generated over time reduces antibody detection sensitivity. The solution to this problem described therein is to dissociate the intraprotein or interprotein disulfide bond using a reducing agent before or during detection, thereby improving the antibody detection sensitivity. Since even the solubilized proteins might precipitate over time, some approach is necessary for solving this problem.

TAPS-sulfonate (trimethylammoniopropyl methanethiosulfonate; hereinafter, referred to as TAPS) is known as a compound that solubilizes proteins. TAPS can bind to thiol groups in a protein to reversibly cationize the protein (see e.g., M. Seno et al., Growth Factors, 15, 215-229 (1998) and M. Inoue et al., Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 28, 207-213 (1998)).

The cationized protein exhibits improved solubility in water. Since the binding of TAPS to the protein is reversible reaction, TAPS is known to dissociate from the protein upon cellular uptake so that the protein can exert its original functions as a result of refolding. Nonetheless, no attempt has been made so far on the process of preparing a reagent for antibody detection by use of solubilization using TAPS. Also, antibodies are generally known to bind to glycosylated proteins. No previous report, however, shows whether an antibody can bind to a protein bound with an artificially synthesized compound such as TAPS.

SUMMARY

The present reagent and methods have been made in light of the circumstances mentioned above. The present application provides a method for efficiently producing a reagent for the detection of an antibody present in a liquid sample, the antibody specifically binding to a poorly soluble antigenic protein. The present application also provides a reagent for antibody detection produced by the production method and use thereof.

Solution to Problem

Specifically, an object of the present application is to provide the following aspects:

(1) A method for producing a reagent for antibody detection comprising an antigenic protein and a carrier, the method comprising the steps of: solubilizing the antigenic protein by cationization; and allowing the cationized antigenic protein to bind to the carrier;

(2) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to (1), wherein the antigenic protein is a full-length protein;

(3) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to (1) or (2), wherein the antigenic protein is a membrane protein;

(4) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to any one of (1) to (3), wherein the antigenic protein is a cancer antigenic protein;

(5) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to any one of

(1) to (4), wherein the cationization is performed by the binding of a cationizing agent to thiol groups of the antigenic protein.

(6) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to (5), wherein the cationizing agent is selected from any one of a thiosulfonate compound, a mixed disulfide compound, a pyridyl sulfide cationizing agent, and an alkyl halide cationizing agent, and mixtures thereof;

(7) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to (6), wherein the thiosulfonate compound is a compound represented by the following formula:

wherein R¹represents a linear alkylene group having 2 to 20 carbon atoms; R²represents an alkyl group having 1 to 3 carbon atoms; and n represents any integer of 1 to 3.

(8) The method according to (7), wherein the compound is TAPS-sulfonate wherein R¹is —(CH₂)3-; R²is CH₃—; and n is 1;

(9) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to (7), wherein the compound is TAP3S-sulfonate wherein R¹is —(CH₂)₃—; R²is CH₃; and n is 3;

(10) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to (6), wherein the alkyl halide cationizing agent is TAP-Br;

(11) The method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to any one of (1) to (10), wherein the carrier is magnetic beads;

(12) A reagent for antibody detection produced by a method according to any one of (I) to (11);

(13) A method for detecting an antigen-specific antibody contained in a sample, the 10 method comprising the steps of: contacting a reagent for antibody detection according to (12) with the sample; adding thereto an antibody-binding labeled secondary antibody to allow the secondary antibody to bind to the antibody; recovering the reagent for antibody detection; and detecting the reagent for antibody detection bound with the antibody; and

(14) The method according to (13), wherein the sample is an isolated body fluid.

The present application describes that a reagent for antibody detection that is intended to detect an antibody against an antigenic protein can be produced by the configuration as described above.

Advantageous Effects

A cationizing agent can be used in an antigenic protein solubilization step to thereby efficiently solubilize and recover antigenic proteins. Hence, a reagent for antibody detection comprising a large number of antigenic protein molecules bound with a carrier can be efficiently produced, compared with conventional methods.

Furthermore, this reagent for antibody detection is much more stable than reagents produced by the conventional methods and can thus be stored for a long period.

In one aspect of the present application, poorly soluble antigenic proteins can be used as antigens for antibody detection. Use of such antigenic proteins permits detection of antibodies even if the antigenic proteins, because of their difference in HLA type, differ in epitope portions which can be recognized by the antibodies. This eliminates the need of producing a plurality of reagents according to the HLA type of a subject and can provide an efficient production method, compared with the methods involving the immobilization of epitope peptides on beads.

In addition, the cationizing agent bound with thiol groups in an antigenic protein can inhibit the time-dependent generation of an intraprotein or interprotein disulfide bond. This can be expected to be effective for preventing reagents for antibody detection from aggregating over time through interprotein disulfide bonds. Thus, the reagents for antibody detection can maintain their functions, compared with the conventional methods, even when poorly soluble antigenic proteins are bound with a carrier or even after long-term storage at room temperature or at 4° C. or −20° C.

On the other hand, such artificially synthesized compounds bound with antigenic proteins might hinder the antigenic proteins from binding to antibodies. However, the present application reveals that antibodies can be detected using antigenic proteins even bound with cationizing agents.

According to these features, a reagent for antibody detection can be efficiently produced by use of the production method of the present application. The reagent for antibody detection produced by the production method of the present application can detect an antibody (against an antigenic protein) present in a liquid sample and as such, can detect a cancer antigenic protein-specific antibody from a serum sample, for example, regardless of the HLA type of a cancer patient.

TAPS-sulfonate or TAP-Br, in particular, has a low molecular weight. This compound can therefore minimize steric hindrance that inhibits protein-antibody reaction, while maintaining its high solubilizing ability. This low molecular weight also facilitates the binding of a plurality of its molecules to a protein. As a result, all SH groups contained in the protein can be cationized. This can prevent beads from aggregating during long-term storage. By virtue of these features, the method of the present application using TAPS-sulfonate or TAP-Br is more effective than the conventional methods.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating protein cationization.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing results of SDS-PAGE analysis after cationization of WT-1 with TAPS.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing results of SDS-PAGE analysis after cationization of MAGE-A4 with TAPS.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing results of HPLC purification of TAPS-bound WT-1.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing results of HPLC purification of TAPS-bound MAGE-A4.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing results of SDS-PAGE analysis after HPLC purification of TAPS-bound WT-1 and MAGE-A4. Min represents an elution time in the HPLC purification (FIG. 4 or 5). For example, the lane indicated by “49 min” depicts the migration of fractions collected for 1 minute from the elution time of 49 minutes.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing results of SDS-PAGE analysis of prepared antigenic proteins. Each lane was charged with 2 μg of each antigenic protein.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing results of detecting antibodies against 6 types of cancer antigenic proteins contained in the serum of cancer patients using a reagent for antibody detection produced by the production method of the present application.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing results of detecting antibodies against 3 types of cancer antigenic proteins contained in the serum of cancer patients using a reagent for antibody detection produced by the production method of the present application.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing results of detecting antibodies against 3 types of cancer antigenic proteins contained in the serum of cancer patients using a reagent for antibody detection produced by the production method of the present application.

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing results of reverse-phase HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) performed on TAPS-bound, TAP3 S-bound, native, and reduced lysozymes.

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the percentages of bead aggregates contained in suspensions of TAPS-bound, TAP3S-bound, native, and reduced MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored at 4° C. for 5 days or at 37° C. for 10 days or 41 days.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing results of Western blotting performed on storage solutions of TAPS-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads (lane 2), TAP3S-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads (lane 3), and native MAGE-A4-immobilized beads (lane 4) stored for 104 days. Lane 1 depicts the migration of 100 ng of the MAGE-A4 protein as a control.

FIG. 14 provides images showing the detection of proteins bound with the surface of Bio-Plex COOH beads, TAPS-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored for 104 days, TAP3S-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored for 104 days, and native MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored for 104 days. The left images are images taken by a confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscope. The right images are differential interference images (bright field) taken at the same time therewith.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present reagent and methods will be described.

First, the method for producing a reagent for antibody detection according to the present application (hereinafter, also referred to as the production method of the present application) will be described.

The production method of the present application is a method for producing a reagent for antibody detection, comprising the steps of: solubilizing the antigenic protein by cationization; and allowing the cationized antigenic protein to bind to the carrier. The antigenic protein may be a poorly soluble protein.

In the present specification, the term “poorly soluble” is provided merely for illustrating a property of the protein and refers to the property of not forming a uniform mixed solution by dissolution in a liquid, particularly, the property of being impossible or difficult to dissolve in water or a physiological solvent. The poorly soluble proteins of types described herein can be defined as poorly soluble proteins when substantially the majorities thereof are recovered into precipitated fractions after centrifugation at 15,100×g for 1 hour of the proteins in water, in water and a salt, or in water and a physiological solvent that does not denature the proteins.

The “protein” described herein includes peptides, polypeptides, and the like. The protein is not limited to naturally occurring proteins that are found in nature and also encompasses recombinant proteins derived from cells transformed by gene transfer or the like, proteins expressed using an in vitro cell-free protein expression system, and synthetic proteins prepared in a synthetic organic chemistry manner. Alternatively, a functional group may be added to a portion or the whole of amino acids constituting the protein in such a way that the amino acid(s) is acetylated, phosphorylated, or methylated, or a portion or the whole of amino acids constituting the protein may be modified with a sugar, a protein, a lipid, or the like.

The “poorly soluble protein” described herein refers to a protein that is impossible or difficult to dissolve even by stirring in water or a physiological solvent at room temperature and may be dissolved by use of, for example, a denaturant but forms precipitates as a result of the replacement of the denaturant with a physiological solvent. Even in the case of a protein that is soluble in nature, the protein of interest is also expressed as a poorly soluble protein when this protein of interest is recovered in the form of an inclusion body by the expression thereof as a recombinant protein using an organism of different species (e.g., by the construction of an expression system in E. coli using a gene recombination technique). Examples of the poorly soluble protein include, but are not limited to, full-length proteins, membrane proteins, and cancer antigenic proteins.

In the present specification, the term “solubilization” refers to the dissolution of a protein in a physiological solvent with its amino acid sequence maintained. The term “solubilization” means that when a solution containing a protein dissolved with a denaturant is centrifuged after replacement with a physiological solvent, the amount of the protein recovered into a supernatant is increased after the centrifugation.

The full-length proteins mean not only natural proteins confirmed to exist in vivo but a protein encoded by the largest open reading frame (ORF) predicted from the genomic sequence. The amino acid sequences of such full-length proteins can be obtained from, but not limited to, database, for example, The ORFeome Collaboration (http://www.orfeomecollaboration.org/) or GeneCards(R) (http://www.genecards.org/).

The membrane proteins refer to proteins having a transmembrane structure. These proteins are present at the surface of cell membranes, nuclear envelopes, and other intracellular organelles. One protein molecule contains a hydrophilic moiety which is within the cell or is in contact with the outside of the cell, and a hydrophobic moiety which is buried in the cell membrane. For this reason, these membrane proteins, when obtained by expression in E. coli or the like, rarely form a three-dimensional structure in an aqueous solution and tend to form an inclusion body.

The cancer antigenic proteins refer to antigenic proteins that are expressed in tumors and induce immune response or antigenic proteins that can serve as an index for the presence of tumors. Examples of the cancer antigenic proteins include proteins that are expressed at increased levels by the malignant transformation of cells, and proteins having one or some amino acids thereof mutated as a result of the malignant transformation of cells.

A feature of the production method of the present invention is to cationize a protein. More preferably, a feature of the production method of the present invention is to cationize a poorly soluble protein.

The cationization of the protein refers to the addition of excessive positive charges to the protein. The cationized protein exhibits improved solubility in water owing to charge repulsion. Examples of an approach for the protein cationization include the binding of a cationizing agent to a protein.

The “carrier” refers to a material having solid-phase surface to which the antigenic protein is to be bound. Specific examples thereof include, but are not limited to, glass, nylon membranes, semiconductor wafers, and microbeads.

The binding of the antigenic protein to the carrier means that the “antigenic protein” is immobilized directly onto the surface of the carrier using a technique known in the art. Alternatively, the antigenic protein may be immobilized indirectly thereonto via, for example, a biotin-avidin bond or via a linker molecule.

The “sample” refers to a test piece containing the antibody (including subtypes such as IgG, IgA, IgM, IgD, and IgE) and an active fragment thereof (including e.g., Fab and F(ab′)₂fragments) to be detected by the reagent for antibody detection according to the present application.

The “body fluid” refers to a sample in a liquid state that can be collected from an organism. The body fluid corresponds to peripheral blood, bone marrow fluid, cord blood, pleural fluid, ascitic fluid, urine, and the like. The body fluid also corresponds to samples obtained by the treatment of these body fluids according to methods well known to those skilled in the art (e.g., plasma or serum obtained from a supernatant by the centrifugation of peripheral blood).

The “secondary antibody” refers to an antibody and an active fragment thereof that recognizes the antibody (including subtypes such as IgG, IgA, IgM, IgD, and IgE) and an active fragment thereof (including e.g., Fab and F(ab′h fragments) to be detected by the reagent for antibody detection according to the present invention. The “labeled secondary antibody” refers to a secondary antibody bound with a label such as a radioisotope, a luminescent agent, or a fluorophore. Alternatively, a protein such as an enzyme (such as luciferase or peroxidase), biotin or green fluorescent protein (GFP) may be used as the “label”. In the case of such a “label” derived from the protein, the “labeled secondary antibody” may be prepared in a genetic engineering manner as one recombinant protein in the form of a fusion protein.

The cationizing agent that can be used in the production method of the present invention can be any of various compounds that can add positive charges to the protein via disulfide bonds (FIG. 1). For example, a thiosulfonate compound, a mixed disulfide compound, a pyridyl disulfide cationizing agent, or an alkyl halide cationizing agent can be used.

The thiosulfonate compound used in the production method of the present invention is a compound represented by Formula 2 given below. In this formula, X represents a group having a cation. One group having a cation represented by X may be used, or a linkage of the groups represented by X may be used. In the formula, R²represents a lower alkyl group having 1 to 3 carbon atoms. Specifically, the thiosulfonate compound used in the production method of the present application is a thiosulfonate compound having one or more cations derived from X in one molecule. Examples of the group represented by X include quaternary ammonium groups.

The thiosulfonate compound used in the production method of the present invention is a thiosulfonate compound represented by Formula 3 given below having one or more quaternary ammonium group-derived cations in one molecule.

wherein R¹represents a linear or branched alkylene group having 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 carbon atoms; R²represents a lower alkyl group having 1, 2, or 3 carbon atoms; and n represents any integer of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, more preferably any integer of 1, 2, and 3.

Examples of features of the thiosulfonate compound include an inert dissociable group formed as the dissociable group R²after protein cationization reaction as illustrated in FIG. 1.

Examples of the compound containing one quaternary ammonium group-derived cation in one molecule include trimethylammoniopropyl methanethiosulfonate (TAPS-sulfonate; hereinafter, referred to as TAPS). Examples of the compound containing three quaternary ammonium group-derived cations in one molecule include TAP3S-sulfonate (hereinafter, referred to as TAP3S).

TAPS refers to a compound represented by [Formula 4] given below. TAPS has a strongly positively charged quaternary amine in the molecule and cationizes a protein through cysteine residue-mediated binding to the protein. The cationized protein exhibits improved solubility and contains stably protected SH groups. TAPS can be synthesized with reference to, for example, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. (1998) 28, 207-213 or purchased as a reagent in the form of Br salt (represented by Formula 5 given below) (molecular weight: 292.26) (from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Katayama Chemical, Ltd., etc.).

TAP3S refers to a molecular-weight compound represented by Formula 6 given below. TAP3 S has 3 strongly positively charged quaternary amines in the molecule and can more strongly cationize a protein than TAPS. TAP3S can be synthesized with reference to, for example, International Publication No. WO 2011/118731.

Examples of the mixed disulfide compound used in the production method of the present invention include cystamine as represented by Formula 7 given below. In the case of cystamine, NH₃⁺ is the group having a cation.

Examples of the pyridyl sulfide cationizing agent used in the production method of the present invention include compounds as represented by Formula 8 given below. X represents a group having a cation. One group having a cation represented by X may be used, or a linkage of the groups represented by X may be used.

The cationizing agent that can be used m the production method of the present application may be an alkyl halide cationizing agent that can add positive charges to a protein through S-alkylation. For example, (3-bromopropyl)trimethylammonium (TAP-Br) can be used. TAP-Br irreversibly binds SH groups in a protein and thereby improves its protein-solubilizing ability. TAP-Br (molecular weight: 261.00) can be purchased, for example, as a reagent in the form of Br salt (represented by Formula 9) (e.g., from Sigma-Aldrich Corp.).

Various cationizing agents can be used in the production method of the present invention. TAPS-sulfonate or TAP-Br, in particular, has a low molecular weight. This compound can therefore minimize steric hindrance that inhibits protein-antibody reaction, while maintaining its high solubilizing ability. This low molecular weight also facilitates the binding of a plurality of its molecules to a protein. As a result, all SH groups contained in the protein can be cationized. This can prevent beads from aggregating during long-term storage.

Hereinafter, the steps of preparing an antigenic protein and preparing a TAPS-bound antigenic protein using TAPS will be described as one example of the obtainment of a cationized antigenic protein.

A gene of the antigenic protein is transferred to E. coli, which is then cultured. The cultured E. coli is homogenized to recover the antigenic protein. In this recovery, the antigenic protein may be in the form of an inclusion body.

The recovered inclusion body is solubilized with a denaturant. Examples of the denaturant used include, but are not limited to, urea, guanidine hydrochloride, and surfactants.

The antigenic protein thus denatured is treated with a reducing agent to cleave the SS bonds. Examples of the reducing agent include, but are not limited to, dithiothreitol (DTT) and 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME).

TAPS is added to the solution containing the denatured antigenic protein, and the mixture is left standing at room temperature for 30 minutes. The amount of TAPS added is preferably a TAPS molar concentration of I to 10 times, more preferably 1.1 to 1.2 times the molar concentration of thiol groups contained in the antigenic protein and the solution.

After 30 minutes, polyethyleneimine having an average molecular weight of 600 is added at a final concentration of 0.2% to the solution containing the TAPS-bound antigenic protein. Then, 10% acetic acid is added thereto in 4 times the amount of the resulting solution. The solution containing the TAPS-bound antigenic protein is centrifuged to recover a supernatant.

Subsequently, the TAPS-bound antigenic protein contained in the supernatant is purified. In the purification, a method such as dialysis or column chromatography can be used. For example, the supernatant is transferred to a dialysis tube and dialyzed against pure water or up to 0.5% acetic acid at 4° C. to remove the denaturant. The dialyzed liquid is centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4° C. to room temperature for 15 minutes to recover a supernatant.

The cationized antigenic protein is obtained through these steps.

The cationized antigenic protein exhibits high water solubility, is easily prepared, and exhibits very high stability under weakly acidic conditions (preferably pH 6 or lower, more preferably pH 2 to 5). The cationized antigenic protein therefore can maintain its water solubility in a state where epitopes in its full-length protein are seamlessly exposed. For this reason, all epitopes contained in one antigenic protein can be immobilized on one type of bead so as to facilitate the reaction of the epitopes with antibodies.

Next, the TAPS-bound protein is allowed to bind to a carrier.

In one aspect, magnetic beads, non-magnetic beads, a microplate, or the like can be used as the carrier. Magnetic beads are preferably used in terms of convenient analysis operation. Hereinafter, a case using the beads as the carrier will be described.

The beads are suspended in a solution for binding. In the case where the beads have already been modified to help the beads bind to the protein, the beads are bound directly to the TAPS-bound protein. In the absence of such modification to help the beads bind to the protein, the beads are modified with a material, such as skimmed milk, which does not inhibit the reaction of the TAPS-bound protein with an antibody during antibody detection.

The solution of the TAPS-bound protein is mixed with the suspension of the beads. For example, 2 to 16 hours are preferred as the mixing time of beads activated into a state reactive with amino groups.

The beads are recovered, then suspended in a solution for washing, and washed by centrifugation. Examples of the solution for washing include phosphate buffer solutions. For storing the beads thus washed, the beads are suspended in a buffer for storage and stored. Examples of the buffer for storage include a storage buffer available from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. A weakly acidic (preferably pH 6 or lower, more preferably pH 2 to 5) buffer for storage more stably maintains the solubility of the TAPS-bound protein.

The reagent for antibody detection can be produced through these steps.

Next, an antibody detection method will be described in detail as one aspect using the reagent for antibody detection produced by the production method of the present application (hereinafter, referred to as the reagent of the present application).

The reagent of the present invention may be a reagent for antibody detection comprising a cationized poorly soluble antigenic protein and beads.

A sample presumed to contain an antibody is obtained from a subject. A body fluid can be used as the sample. Peripheral blood, bone marrow fluid, cord blood, pleural fluid, ascitic fluid, urine, or the like can be used as the body fluid. Peripheral blood is preferably used in consideration of easy collection and a small burden on the subject. The amount of the sample collected is preferably an amount that puts no heavy burden on the subject. The peripheral blood can be collected by use of a whole blood collection method using a vacuum blood collection tube, a blood collection bag, or the like. For blood collection, heparin or the like may be added in order to prevent the coagulation of blood.

Plasma is collected from the collected blood by centrifugation. Alternatively, the plasma may be obtained during the partial collection of blood by use of an apheresis apparatus.

Also, peripheral blood may be collected, and serum can be obtained by the removal of blood cell components and blood clotting components and also used as the sample.

For antibody detection, the plasma or the serum is diluted, if necessary.

The reagent of the present invention is mixed with the plasma. The mixing time is preferably approximately 2 hours, for example, for reaction at room temperature or overnight reaction at 4° C. The reagent of the present invention is recovered using a centrifugation method or a magnetic apparatus and washed.

There may be apprehension that the cationization influences antigen-antibody reaction. In such a case, the influence can be easily tested, because the cationization can be canceled by treatment with a reducing agent such as dithiothreitol.

For antibody detection, a secondary antibody is allowed to bind to the antibody. In the case of, for example, a human subject, the antibody bound with the reagent of the present invention is a human antibody. Thus, a labeled anti-human antibody is used as the secondary antibody for labeling. Examples thereof include biotinylated anti-human IgG mouse monoclonal antibodies.

The beads bound with the secondary antibody are detected using a flow cytometer. Bio-Plex beads (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), in which beads themselves are stained, may be used in the detection. In such a case, plural types of beads can be applied simultaneously to an apparatus. Thus, plural types of antibodies can be analyzed by one operation. This can shorten the analysis time.

An antibody can also be detected from other liquid samples using the reagent of the present invention in the same way as described in the above paragraphs except that the plasma is changed to the liquid samples such as serum.

The analysis of an antibody contained in the blood of a subject according to these embodiments presumably achieves the following situations:

- The allergenic reactivity of the subject is determined by the analysis of in vivo antibodies in the subject;
- An antibody that correlates with therapeutic effects or a progress after treatment is found by antibody analysis conducted before and after the treatment. The antibody thus found is used as an index to decide a therapeutic strategy or to predict or determine prognosis;
- For immune cell therapy, an antigen whose specific antibody has been detected in the serum of a patient is used in the treatment to thereby improve therapeutic effects;
- Before and after radiotherapy, antibodies are analyzed to thereby predict therapeutic effects reportedly involving immune functions, such as abscopal effects.

Although the effects mentioned above may be attained by a reagent for antibody detection using an epitope peptide, the reagent of the present invention is superior in that proteins can be used. This is because use of the proteins allows antibodies to be detected without being limited by the HLA type of a subject. As a result, even an HLA type that is generally regarded as being minor and thus less understood in epitope peptide analysis can be analyzed.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to Examples. However, the present invention is not intended to be limited by these Examples by any means, as a matter of course.

Example 1

First, each antigenic protein for use in antibody detection was prepared.

E. coli T7 Express was transformed with each of 2 types of plasmid DNAs of His-tag-fused MAGE-A4 (SEQ ID NOs: 16 and 17, antigenic protein sequence: SEQ ID NOs: 3 and 4) and His-tag-fused WT-1 (SEQ ID NOs: 14 and 15, antigenic protein sequence: SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 2) cloned into pET28b vectors. Several colonies formed on a plate were picked up, then added to IO mL of an LB/Kan25 medium, and shake-cultured for 2 hours.

Next, a small amount of the cultures was added to 400 mL of a TB medium and further cultured at 37° C. When the bacterial cell concentration reached OD600=0.7 to 0.8, IPTG was added thereto at a final concentration of 0.5 mM. The cells were further cultured at 37° C. for 3 hours.

The bacterial cells were dispersed using a sonicator in 40 mL of a Iysis butter (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgSO4, and 0.2% Tween 20) and further homogenized by 1 minute×3 sets.

To the solution containing the bacterial cell homogenates, 1 μL of a strong nuclease Benzonase (HC) was added, and the mixture was left standing at room temperature for approximately 15 minutes.

For WT-1, precipitates (inclusion body) were recovered by centrifugation (8 krpm, 10 to 15 min, room temperature), while the supernatant was removed. To the recovered precipitates, 50 to 100 mL of RO water was added, and the precipitates were resuspended using a sonicator and recovered by centrifugation (8 krpm, 10 to 15 min, room temperature).

For MAGE-A4, a supernatant was recovered by centrifugation (8 krpm, 10 to 15 min, room temperature).

<Solubilization of WT-I by Reversible Cationization Method of Denatured Precipitated Fraction>

The precipitates were dissolved in 5 to 10 mL of 6 M guanidine and 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8)+1 mM EDTA. After deaeration and nitrogen substitution, 30 mM DTT (solid) was added thereto, followed by treatment at 37° C. for approximately I hour.

To the solution containing WT-1, 70 mM TAPS-sulfonate was added, followed by treatment at 37° C. for approximately 30 minutes.

To the solution containing WT-1 and TAPS-sulfonate, acetic acid in an amount of 1/10 thereof and 0.1% PEI600 were added, and the mixture was then well dialyzed against Milli-Q water at 4° C. After the dialysis, SDS-PAGE was performed. The results are shown in FIG. 2. The lane indicated by sup depicts the migration of the solution thus dialyzed. The lane indicated by ppt depicts the migration of a sample obtained as an insoluble fraction after the dialysis. The lane indicated by “Reduced” depicts the migration of the protein separated from TAPS by the addition of a reducing agent to the sample. The lane indicated by “Non-reduced” depicts the migration of the TAPS-bound protein without the addition of a reducing agent to the sample. The SDS-PAGE analysis results shown in FIG. 2 demonstrated that WT-1 was successfully TAPS-bound and solubilized.

<His-Tag Purification of MAGE-A4 Using Co²Column>

A Co²column was equilibrated with solution A(20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl, and 0.2% Tween 20). Then, the supernatant of MAGE-A4 was adsorbed onto the resin. Then, the resin was thoroughly washed with solution A Next, 30 mL of solution A+5 mM imidazole was injected thereto. After addition of 4 mL of solution A+200 mM imidazole, the column was left standing for 5 minutes, followed by protein elution. This operation was repeated five times to recover purified MAGE-A4.

<Binding of TAPS to MAGE-A4>

MAGE-A4 thus affinity-purified was added to an eggplant-shaped flask, then dehydrated using a freeze dryer, and dissolved in 3 mL of 6 M guanidine and 0.1 M Tris-Hct (pH 8). After deaeration and nitrogen substitution, 30 mM DTT (solid) was added thereto, followed by treatment at 37° C. for approximately I hour. To the solution containing MAGE-A4, 70 mM TAPS-sulfonate was added, followed by treatment at 37° C. for approximately 30 minutes.

To the solution containing MAGE-A4 and TAPS-sulfonate, acetic acid in an amount of 1/10 thereof and 0.1% PEI600 were added, and the mixture was then well dialyzed against Milli-Q water at 4° C. After the dialysis, SDS-PAGE was performed. The results are shown in FIG. 3.

TAPS-bound MAGE-A4 and WT-1 were purified using reverse-phase HPLC. The chromatograms are shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.

After HPLC, TAPS-bound MAGE-A4 and WT-I were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The results are shown in FIG. 6. The analysis results demonstrated that a highly pure antigenic protein can be prepared by the reverse-phase HPLC purification of the TAPS-bound protein. Fractions were recovered as MAGE-A4 at elution times of 50 minutes to 51 minutes (lane “S0min” in FIG. 6), while fractions were recovered as WT-1 at elution times of 52 minutes to 53 minutes (lane “52 min” in FIG. 6). These fractions were used in the subsequent steps.

His-tag-fused NY-ESO-1 (SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 19, antigenic protein sequence: SEQ ID NOs: 5 and 6), XAGElb (SEQ ID NOs: 20 and 21, antigenic protein sequence: SEQ ID NOs: 7 and 8), gp100 (SEQ ID NOs: 22 and 23, antigenic protein sequence: SEQ ID NOs: 9 and 10), Survivin-2B (SEQ ID NOs: 24 and 25, antigenic protein sequence: SEQ ID NOs: 11 and 12) were prepared by the same method as that for WT-1. The prepared proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The results are shown in FIG. 7.

<Binding to Bio-Plex COOH Beads (Manufactured by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.)>

The antigens were immobilized onto 6 types of Bio-Plex COOH beads (amount of 1/10 (1.25×10⁶beads)) using Bio-Plex amine coupling kit (manufactured by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). All of the antigens used were antigens in a denatured state solubilized by TAPS binding (11 μg each).

Each solubilized protein was dissolved in a buffer and left standing on ice.

The container of the COOH beads was shaken for 30 seconds with a vortex mixer, and the beads were suspended by sonication for 30 seconds.

The COOH bead suspension was centrifuged at 14,000×g for 4 minutes to remove a supernatant.

To the recovered precipitates, 100 μL of a bead wash buffer was added. The mixture was shaken for 10 seconds with a vortex mixer, and the beads were suspended by sonication for 10 seconds. The COOH bead suspension was centrifuged at 14,000×g for 4 minutes to remove a supernatant.

To the recovered precipitates, 80 μL of a bead activation buffer was added. The mixture was well shaken for 30 seconds with a vortex mixer, and the beads were suspended by sonication for 30 seconds.

To the COOH bead suspension, 10% of 50 mg/mL EDAC was added, and then, 10 μL of 50 mg/mL S-NHS (N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide) was added. The COOH bead suspension was shaken for 30 seconds with a vortex mixer.

While the beads were shielded from light, the COOH bead suspension was shaken for 20 minutes in a rotary incubator.

To the COOH bead suspension, 150 μL of PBS was added, and the mixture was shaken for 10 seconds with a vortex mixer. The COOH bead suspension was centrifuged at 14,000×g for 4 minutes to remove a supernatant. This operation was repeated again.

To the recovered precipitates, 100 μL of PBS was added. The mixture was shaken for 30 seconds with a vortex mixer, and the beads were suspended by sonication for 15 seconds.

The COOH bead suspension was mixed with the TAPS-bound protein suspension. The total amount of the mixture was adjusted to 500 μL by the addition of PBS.

While the beads were shielded from light, the COOH bead suspension was shaken at room temperature for 2 hours in a rotary incubator.

The suspension containing the COOR beads and the TAPS-bound protein was centrifuged at 14,000×g for 4 minutes to remove a supernatant.

The COOH beads (on which the TAPS-bound protein was immobilized) recovered as precipitates were washed by the addition of 500 μL of PBS. The COOH bead suspension was centrifuged at 14,000×g for 4 minutes to remove a supernatant.

The COOH beads recovered as precipitates were resuspended by the addition of 250 μL of a blocking buffer. The COOR bead suspension was shaken for 15 seconds with a vortex mixer.

While the COOH beads were shielded from light using an aluminum foil, the COOH bead suspension was shaken at room temperature for 30 minutes in a rotary incubator. The COOH bead suspension was centrifuged at 14,000×g for 4 minutes to remove a supernatant.

The COOH beads recovered as precipitates were resuspended by the addition of 500 μL of a buffer for storage. The COOH bead suspension was centrifuged at 16,000×g for 6 minutes to remove a supernatant.

The TAPS-bound protein-immobilized beads thus obtained were suspended in 100 μL of a storage buffer and stored therein. Table 1 shows the concentration of each type of bead.

TABLE 1 Bead concentration Cancer antigenic protein Bead No. (the number of beads/mL) NY-ESO-1 26 4.33 × 10⁶ XAGE1b 28 5.59 × 10⁶ MAGE-A4 43 3.68 × 10⁶ WT-1 45 1.95 × 10⁶ gp100 62 6.09 × 10⁶ Survivin-2B 64 1.61 × 10⁶

Example 2 <Analysis of Antibody Contained in Serum of Cancer Patient-1>

Blood was collected from two cancer patients (Donor 1 and Donor 2), and serum was obtained therefrom.

Six types of magnetic beads on which the antigenic proteins (NY-ESO-1, WT-I, MAGE-A4, XAGElb, gp100, and Survivin-2B) were respectively immobilized were mixed at the same concentrations and dispensed to the wells of a 96-well plate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., #171-025001). The serum of each patient was added to each well. While shielded from light using an aluminum foil, the plate was shaken at room temperature for 1 hour for reaction. The beads were washed with Wash Station (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). For antibody detection, biotinylated anti-human IgG (H+L) (manufactured by Vector Laboratories, Inc., BA-3000) was added as a secondary antibody to each well. While shielded from light using an aluminum foil, the plate was shaken at room temperature for 30 minutes for reaction. The beads were washed with Wash Station (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). (R-)Phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled streptavidin (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) was added to each well. While shielded from light using an aluminum foil, the plate was shaken at room temperature for 10 minutes for reaction. The beads were washed with Wash Station (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and analyzed using Bio-Plex (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The serum of each patient used was diluted 400-fold, 1600-fold, and 6400-fold.

As shown in FIG. 8, the sample derived from Donor 1 was confirmed to respond to NY-ES0-1.

This result suggested that: the blood of Donor 1 contained an antibody recognizing NY-ES0-1; cancer in Donor 1 expressed NY-ES0-1; and peptide vaccine or DC vaccine therapy using NY-ES0-1 was possibly effective for Donor I.

As a result of this test, the sample derived from Donor 2 was confirmed to respond to XAGElb.

This result suggested that: the blood of Donor 2 contained an antibody recognizing XAGEib; cancer in Donor 2 expressed XAGElb; and peptide vaccine or DC vaccine therapy using XAGElb was possibly effective for Donor 2.

Example 3 <Analysis of Antibody Contained in Serum of Cancer Patient-2>

Serum was obtained from 8 renal cell cancer patients (Donor 2 to Donor 9) before and after EP-DC therapy.

The EP-DC therapy refers to a treatment method which involves: preparing lysates by the freeze-thaw method or the like from tumor tissues removed by surgery from a cancer patient; electroloading the lysates into dendritic cells; and administering the dendritic cell vaccine thus prepared to the patient.

Six types of magnetic beads on which the antigenic proteins were respectively immobilized were mixed at the same concentrations and dispensed to the wells of a 96-well plate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., #I 71-025001). The serum of each patient was added to each well. While shielded from light using an aluminum foil, the plate was shaken at room temperature for 1 hour for reaction. The beads were washed with Wash Station (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). For antibody detection, biotinylated anti-human IgG (H+L) (manufactured by Vector Laboratories, Inc., BA-3000) was added as a secondary antibody to each well. While shielded from light using an aluminum foil, the plate was shaken at room temperature for 30 minutes for reaction. The beads were washed with Wash Station (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). PE-labeled streptavidin (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) was added to each well. While shielded from light using an aluminum foil, the plate was shaken at room temperature for 10 minutes for reaction. The beads were washed with Wash Station (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and analyzed using an assay apparatus of Bio-Plex (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The serum of each patient used was diluted 400-fold, 1600-fold, and 6400-fold.

As shown in FIG. 9, the serum of Donor 6 and Donor 8 was confirmed to respond to MAGE-A4. Accordingly, the blood of Donor 6 and Donor 8 contained an antibody recognizing MAGE-A4, suggesting that the in vivo tumor tissues of the patients Donor 6 and Donor 8 possibly expressed MAGE-A4. In this case, peptide vaccine or DC vaccine therapy using MAGE-A4 was presumably appropriate for these patients.

As shown in FIG. 10, the serum of Donor 3 was confirmed to respond more highly to WT-1 after DC vaccine therapy compared with before the therapy. Accordingly, the blood of Donor 3 contained an antibody recognizing WT-1, suggesting that the tumor tissues of Donor 3 possibly expressed WT-1. In this case, peptide vaccine or DC vaccine therapy using WT-1 was presumably appropriate for this patient.

Example 4

Chicken egg white lysozyme (SEQ ID NO: 13; hereinafter, also simply referred to as lysozyme; manufactured by Kewpie Corp.) was used as a sample to evaluate the ability of a cationizing reagent to protect SH groups.

15 mg of the lysozyme was weighed into a 100-mL pear-shaped flask and dissolved in 2 mL of 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), and 2 mM EDTA. After deaeration and nitrogen substitution of the obtained solution, dithiothreitol (DTT) was added thereto at a final concentration of 30 mM, and the mixture was reacted for 2 hours in a thermostat bath of 37° C. To the obtained reduced lysozyme, each cationizing reagent (TAPS-sulfonate (manufactured by Katayama Chemical, Ltd.) or TAP3 S-sulfonate) was added at a final concentration of 70 mM, and the mixture was further reacted at room temperature for 2 hours. The reaction was stopped by the addition of acetic acid in 1/10 of the amount of the obtained solution. Then, the solution was dialyzed against Milli-Q water at 4° C. for 1 day to obtain TAPS-bound lysozyme and TAP3S-bound lysozyme. The TAP3S-sulfonate used was synthesized according to the approach described in Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-070804.

TAPS-bound, TAP3S-bound, native, and reduced lysozymes were subjected to reverse—phase HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography). The native lysozyme contains four SS bonds in one molecule, and has hydrophilicity to some extent because its hydrophobic groups are not exposed. The reduced lysozyme is a denatured protein with its SS bonds reduced and has the highest hydrophobicity (lowest solubility in water). The column used was COSMOSIL Protein-R (manufactured by Nacalai Tesque, Inc.). The solvent used was acetonitrile diluted with 0.1% hydrochloric acid, and the acetonitrile concentration was set to 1% to 50%.

The results summarizing reverse-phase HPLC charts are shown in FIG. 11. The straight line represents the concentrations of acetonitrile. Peaks positioned closer to the left side mean lower hydrophobicity (higher solubility in water) of samples. The TAP3S-bound lysozyme was more hydrophilic than the native and reduced lysozymes and was eluted with a low-concentration acetonitrile solvent. TAP3S, however, has the difficulty in protecting and cationizing all of the 8 SH groups in the lysozyme and showed peak dispersion due to contamination by imperfect products in which a portion of SH groups was unprotected. By contrast, in the TAPS-bound lysozyme, all of the 8 SH groups were protected and cationized, demonstrating high homogeneity. Such a difference in the ability to protect SH groups between TAPS and TAP3S is attributed to the sizes of their molecules. This is presumably because, in the case of protecting somewhat dense SH groups on a protein molecule, the large TAP3S molecule causes steric hindrance on the protein molecule to be cationized, resulting in a trace amount of residual SH groups incapable of binding to TAP3S; thus, the subsequent SH/SS exchange reaction proceeds slowly.

Example 5 <Evaluation of Storage Stability of Beads>

When a reagent for antibody detection is prepared and stored in a state where the SH groups of the protein are incompletely protected, it is possible that unprotected residual SH groups form SS bonds to cause the aggregation of proteins or the aggregation of reagents for antibody detection. Thus, the storage stability of the reagent for antibody detection was confirmed by the following procedures.

According to the procedures described in Example 1, TAPS-bound, TAP3S-bound, or native MAGE-A4 was prepared, and beads on which each protein was immobilized were prepared.

The prepared beads were suspended in a buffer for storage and stored under conditions of 4° C. or 37° C. After a lapse of given time, the abundance of bead aggregates among the beads in the suspension was measured using a hemocytometer. The percentage of bead aggregates shown in the results was calculated according to the number of aggregates each involving 3 or more beads/the total number of beads x 100.

FIG. 12 shows the percentage of bead aggregates contained in each suspension stored at 4° C. for 5 days or at 37° C. for 10 days or 41 days. In the case of storage at 4° C., the percentage of bead aggregates was decreased in the stored TAPS-bound or TAP3S-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads compared with the stored native MAGE-A4-immobilized beads. In the case of storage at 37° C., the percentage of bead aggregates was decreased in the stored TAPS-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads compared with the stored native MAGE-A4-immobilized beads.

Next, the bead storage solution was subjected to SOS-PAGE in order to confirm that this decrease in the percentage of bead aggregates was not attributed to the liberation of the immobilized antigenic protein from the beads.

MAGE-A4 immobilized on the beads was N-terminally His-tagged. Thus, liberated MAGE-A4 proteins in the storage solution of the MAGE-A4-immobilized beads were detected by Western blotting using an anti-His-tag antibody (OGHis, manufactured by Medical & Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd. (MBL)).

The results are shown in FIG. 13. The storage solutions of the TAPS-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads, the TAP3 S-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads, and the native MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored for I 04 days were used as the samples migrated in lanes 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Free proteins were detected at the same levels among all of these samples, demonstrating the absence of the phenomenon in which cationization facilitates the liberation of antigenic proteins from beads.

In addition, bound proteins were detected as to Bio-Plex COOH beads, the TAPS-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored for 104 days, the TAP3S-bound MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored for 104 days, and the native MAGE-A4-immobilized beads stored for 104 days.

An anti-His-tag antibody (OGHis, manufactured by Medical & Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd. (MBL)) diluted to 200 ng/mL in PBS was mixed with the beads of each type at room temperature for 30 minutes. Then, the beads were washed twice with PBS. Next, an anti-mouse IgG-Alexa 488 (secondary antibody; Invitrogen Corp.) diluted to 200 ng/mL in PBS was mixed with the beads of each type at room temperature for 30 minutes. Then, the beads were washed twice with PBS. These beads were observed under a confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscope (excitation light: 488 nm, fluorescence filter LP505) to visualize the presence of the His-tagged MAGE-A4 protein on the surface of the beads. The taken images are shown in FIG. 14. All of the images were taken with the same detection sensitivity. As shown in FIG. 14, the MAGE-A4 protein was confirmed to be bound with the surface of all of the beads.

The results of Example 5 demonstrated that the beads prepared by the method for producing a reagent for antibody detection disclosed in the present invention are more effective for inhibiting the formation of aggregates than beads prepared using a native protein. This inhibition of the formation of aggregates was also confirmed to be not attributed to the liberation of the antigenic protein from the bead surface. TAP3S is generally known to be superior in protein-solubilizing ability to TAPS. Unlike this solubilizing ability, however, the inhibitory effects on the aggregation of prepared beads were shown to be higher in TAPS.

Example 6

XAGEl b or NY-ES0-1 affinity-purified as described above was added to an eggplant-shaped flask, then dehydrated using a freeze dryer, and dissolved in 3 mL of 6 M guanidine and 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8). After deaeration and nitrogen substitution, 30 mM OTT (solid) was added thereto, followed by treatment at 37° C. for approximately 1 hour. To the solution containing XAGElb or NY-ESO-1, 70 mM TAP-Br was added, followed by treatment at 37° C. for approximately 60 minutes.

To the solution containing XAGElb or NY-ESO-1 and TAP-Br, acetic acid in an amount of 1/10 thereof was added, and the mixture was then well dialyzed against Milli-Q water at 4° C. TAP-bound XAGE lb or NY-ESO-1 was purified by reverse-phase HPLC.

Beads on which TAP-bound XAGElb, TAPS-bound XAGElb, TAP-bound NY-ESO-1, and TAPS-bound NY-ESO-1 were respectively immobilized were prepared by the method described in Example 1. The TAP-bound antigenic protein was also confirmed to be successfully immobilized on the beads, as with the TAPS-bound antigenic protein.

All publications and patents cited herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

As described above, a reagent for antibody detection comprising an antigenic protein can be efficiently produced by use of the production method of the present invention. The reagent for antibody detection produced by the production method of the present invention was confirmed to be highly stable and also capable of efficiently detecting an antibody in a liquid sample. Use of the reagent of the present invention can provide an antibody analysis test that is free from the constraints of the HLA type of a subject. This test can probably be carried out, for example, to thereby decide a therapeutic strategy for a disease involving the immunity or to thereby predict or determine therapeutic effects on the disease.

Claims

1. A method for detecting an antigen-specific antibody contained in a sample, the method comprising the steps of:

contacting the sample with a reagent for detection of antibody binding to an epitope of an antigenic protein to bind the antigen-specific antibody with the reagent for detection;

wherein the reagent for detection comprises a carrier material and a cationized, denatured antigenic protein immobilized on a solid-phase surface of the carrier material; wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein has cationized SH groups formed from reaction with a cationizing agent;

adding thereto a labeled secondary antibody to allow the labeled secondary antibody to bind to the antigen-specific antibody; and

detecting the reagent for detection bound with the antigen-specific antibody.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is a cationized, denatured full-length protein.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is a cationized, denatured membrane protein.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is a cationized, denatured cancer antigenic protein.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the carrier material is a membrane, wafer, microplate or bead.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the carrier material is a magnetic microbead.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the solid-phase surface is a glass, nylon or semiconductor surface.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the carrier material is a carboxylated polystyrene bead.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is immobilized through a reaction of an antigenic protein amino group with an activated carboxylic acid group on the solid-phase surface.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is indirectly immobilized on the solid-phase surface.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is immobilized indirectly on the solid-phase surface via a biotin-avidin bond.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein has cationized SH groups formed from reaction with an alkyl halide cationizing agent.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the alkyl halide cationizing agent is (3-bromopropyl)-trimethylammonium (TAP-Br).

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein has cationized SH groups formed from reaction with a cationizing agent comprising a thiosulfonate compound, a mixed disulfide compound, a pyridyl sulfide cationizing agent, or a mixture of two of more thereof.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the cationizing agent is trimethylammoniopropyl methanethiosulfonate (TAPS-sulfonate).

16. A reagent for detection of antibody binding to an epitope of an antigenic protein comprising a carrier material and a cationized, denatured antigenic protein immobilized on a solid-phase surface of the carrier material;

wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein has cationized SH groups formed from reaction with a cationizing agent.

17. The reagent of claim 16, wherein the carrier material is a membrane, wafer, microplate or bead.

18. The reagent of claim 16, wherein the cationizing agent comprises a thiosulfonate compound, a mixed disulfide compound, a pyridyl sulfide cationizing agent, alkyl halide cationizing agent or a mixture of two of more thereof.

19. The reagent of claim 16, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is immobilized indirectly on the solid-phase surface via a biotin-avidin bond.

20. The reagent of claim 16, wherein the cationized, denatured antigenic protein is irreversibly immobilized and indirectly bound to the solid-phase surface via a linker molecule.