PROTECTIVE HEADGEAR APPLIANCE
A protective headgear device, or helmet, protects against head injuries such as concussions and CTE by imposing a network of constant force members (CFMs) between an outer impact shell and an inner fitted capsule engaging the skull/head surface. CFMs exhibit a force absorbing behavior that differs from conventional linear spring behavior that impose a counterforce proportional to the displaced distance. CFMs occupy a compact void between the outer impact shell and the inner fitted capsule by component miniaturization and tethers that redirect forces within the void. An absence of conventional foam and straps increases accommodation for the CFMs and connection tethers/attachments. The CFMs exhibit a substantially constant force that avoids a sharp impactful response associated with head injuries.
This patent application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent App. No. 63/000,197 filed Mar. 26, 2020, entitled “PROTECTIVE HEADGEAR,” and of U.S. Provisional Patent App. No. 62/933,677, filed Nov. 11, 2019, entitled “PROTECTIVE SPORTS HELMET” and is a Continuation-in-Part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/675,989, filed Aug. 14, 2017, entitled “SELF-RECOVERING IMPACT ABSORBING FOOTWEAR,” all incorporated herein by reference in entirety.
BACKGROUNDModern media coverage of sports related injuries has highlighted cumulative injuries that accrue from repeated head impacts. Multiple occurrences of professional football players experiencing serious mental degradation from Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) have received particular attention, however any contact sport poses a CTE risk environment. This degenerative brain disease has been found in athletes, military veterans, and others with a history of repetitive brain trauma (head impacts). CTE has been observed in patients as young as 17, but symptoms do not generally begin appearing until years after the onset of head impacts. Sports where impact with another player, helmet or a scoring object such as a ball or puck, including baseball, hockey, football, lacrosse, and basketball are under increasing pressure to mitigate possible head injuries.
SUMMARYA protective headgear device, or helmet, protects against head injuries such as concussions and CTE by imposing a network of constant force members (CFMs) between an outer impact shell and an inner fitted capsule engaging the skull/head surface. CFMs exhibit a force absorbing behavior that differs from conventional linear spring behavior that impose a counterforce proportional to the displaced distance. CFMs occupy a compact void between the outer impact shell and the inner fitted capsule by component miniaturization and tethers that redirect forces within the void. An absence of conventional foam and straps increases accommodation for the CFMs and connection tethers/attachments. The CFMs exhibit a substantially constant force that avoids a sharp impactful response associated with head injuries.
Configurations herein are based, in part, on the observation that many human endeavors, most notably athletic competitions but also first responders, construction and other high-risk occupations employ equipment for absorbing and redirecting harmful forces. Headwear articles in particular, such as helmets, face guards and chin straps/guards, are significant due to the possibly grave outcome of high impact head injuries. Unfortunately, conventional approaches to head protection suffer from the shortcoming of a linear spring response exhibited by typical protective appliances. The linear spring response, discussed further below, rapidly approaches an unmitigated force transferal after an initial absorption capability is exhausted. Accordingly, configurations herein substantially overcome the above shortcomings of conventional helmets and protective devices by providing a non-linear spring response in a headgear appliance that provides a constant or near-constant force response over a range of displacement. This controlled force exhibited by the CFMs avoids an external impact resulting in a sharp, injurious force being transferred to the wearer. Rather, the combination of a network of CFMs arranged in relation to areas of expected impact serves to distribute the external impact both in time and area to the head region of the wearer.
In further detail, an impact absorbing helmet appliance device includes an impact shell adapted to receive an incoming force, and a fitted capsule within the impact shell and having an engaging area adapted for communication with a wearer. The fitted capsule is adapted to disperse forces directed to the impact shell by one or more controlled force members (CFM) between the impact shell and the fitted capsule, such that the controlled force members are adapted to apply a nonlinear response for transferring force between the impact shell and the fitted capsule.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Configurations below demonstrate an example headgear appliance embodied as a helmet to be worn on the head of an athlete or other wearer for mitigating head impacts. The examples below depict helmets for use by football platers and baseball catchers as these are predominant uses of helmets in athletic endeavors. Football players exhibit substantial contact with other players and the playing surface during the normal course of play. One particular scenario is helmet-to-helmet contact, resulting in a sharp impact by a hard surface (the other helmet) towards a player's skull. This particular scenario has recently been elevated to a penalty level of disqualification of a player if intentionally caused. Baseball catchers have a propensity for impact from a high-velocity pitched ball (often approaching 100 mph) and from errant bat swings. In both occurrences, the impact is likely directed towards an upper front (forehead) region of the wearer, and imposes a force tending towards the direction behind the catcher. Football impacts, in contrast, are more likely to involve other directions and are also more likely to involve a force directly to the top of the skull, as in the helmet-to-helmet contact scenario since a natural reaction is to lower the face (front) upon eminent impact.
Previous approaches, such as that disclosed in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/675,989, show a similar use of non-linear springs for mitigating harmful forces in fathletic footwear. The footwear force mitigation approach addresses force exerted by the athlete against a playing surface. In contrast, the helmet disclosed herein mitigates external forces exerted against the athlete or wearer. In both contexts, however, the force is mitigated by a plurality of small, force absorbing members disposed to intercept the potentially harmful force by responding according to a non-linear spring response. The non-linear spring response, discussed in graphic detail further below, counters the harmful force with a constant or near-constant force. This differs from conventional foams or springs, often employed for football and catcher helmets. A foam, for example, responds with a counter force until approaching full compression, at which point the foam quickly behaves as a solid surface. Springs or elastics respond with a force that increases approximately linearly with the displaced distance, and generally according to a steep upward curve.
In conventional approaches, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,958,023, a rate-dependent, elastically-deformable device is shown using filaments placed inside a closed tube or vessel defining a confinement member. The confinement member is filled with a fluid that substantially fills the remaining volume inside the elastically-deformable confinement member, and a frictional or mechanical relation between the fluid and the filaments is exploited to affect a resistive force. Configurations of the '023 patent teach use of a non-Newtonian fluids that has a viscosity that changes with the strain rate, which may enable devices to be more tailored for certain operational performance. Thus, both a solid and liquid member are required, and a sealed vessel encapsulating the two imposes a manufacturing and materials constraint not found in the approach herein. Further, the rate-adaptive approach affects only tensional forces, not compressive forces.
Inside the appliance 100, or helmet, a fitted capsule 120 directly engages the athlete's head in a snug manner so as to remain positioned during the force response as described below. The fitted capsule 120 may be provided by any suitable planar or textile material, and may include multiple segments or portions including straps and/or panels for retaining the head relative to the impact shell 110. A displacement zone 130 is defined by a volume between an inner surface 115 of the impact shell 110 and the fitted capsule 120. One or more controlled force members 150-1 . . . 150-6 (150 generally) attach the fitted capsule 120 to the impact shell for absorbing incoming impactful forces according to a nonlinear spring response.
In the configuration of
Various arrangements of CFMs 150 may be employed, and are disposed to address an opposed position 162 on the impact shell 110 from an impact region 164 defined by points having a higher likelihood of receiving the external impact 160. In
It is apparent from
In contrast, the CFM 150 exhibits a more controlled displacement, approaching a horizontal limit as the incoming force 150 continues a displacement. In other words, the force required to move (displace) the CFM remains largely constant over the displaced distance. The CFM 150 responds with a near constant force shown by line 414, thus spreading the force over time, rather than passing it through to the athlete unmitigated. An ideal constant force spring would exhibit a horizontal line over the entire displacement; the configurations herein depict a CFM that exhibits a slight return force until the load increases into the performance portion, where the CFM 150 is fully engaged and tensioned and responds with an only slight incline approaching a horizontal limit.
Each of the CFMs 150 in the configurations above exhibits a response behavior as illustrated in
A coupling such as tether 152 attaches between the impact shell 110 and the deformable member 500, such that the coupling is attached for directing the transferred force to the deformable member 500 in a direction to dispose the deformable member 500 from the region of greater cross 710 section to the region of reduced cross section 720, thus imposing a pulling or tensioning force on the tether 152. In the example of
The annular section 810 has a curved bias for engaging the circumference in an untensioned position, such that the coupling 852 is adapted to draw the annular section into a straight configuration against the curved bias. The elongated member 800 is pre-stressed or formed to have an undeformed or rest position corresponding to a diameter of the cylindrical post 802. An actuation force purports to draw the elongated member 800 around the annular circumference 804 by slidably disposing the elongated member 800 according to the actuation force. An elastic field 514 is defined by a segment or region of the elongated member 800 that deforms from the rest position as it is “straightened” to follow the actuation force, either compression 160 or tension 160′. The elastic field 514 is therefore defined by a portion of the elongated member 800 deforming in response to the force against its curved bias of the annular section 810.
While
A set of compression absorbing CFMs 150-131 . . . 150-138 as in
While the system and methods defined herein have been particularly shown and described with references to embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
Claims
1. An impact absorbing helmet appliance device, comprising:
- an impact shell adapted to receive an incoming force;
- a fitted capsule having an engaging area adapted for communication with a wearer, the fitted capsule adapted to disperse forces directed to the impact shell; and
- one or more controlled force members (CFM) between the impact shell and the fitted capsule, the controlled force members adapted to apply a nonlinear response for transferring force between the impact shell and the fitted capsule.
2. The device of claim 1 wherein at least one of the controlled force members is disposed at an opposed position on the impact shell from an impact region defined by points having a higher likelihood of receiving an external impact.
3. The device of claim 1 wherein the fitted capsule is circumferentially aligned within the impact shell and separated by a displacement zone, the displacement zone permitting non-contact travel of the fitted capsule within the impact shell.
4. The device of claim 1 further comprising a tether attaching the CFM between the impact shell and the fitted capsule, the tether for transferring tensional force between the impact shell and the fitted member in response to an impact force on an opposed side of the impact shell.
5. The device of claim 1 wherein the CFM attaches between the impact shell and the fitted capsule, the CFM adapted for receiving compression forces directed to the impact shell at an attachment point of the CFM, the CFM absorbing force disposing the impact shell towards the fitted capsule.
6. The device of claim 3 further comprising:
- at least one CFM disposed in the displacement zone and tethered for absorbing tensional forces in response to a force imposed on the impact shell on the opposed side of an attachment of the tether; and
- at least one CFM disposed in the displacement zone and disposed for absorbing compressive forces in response to a force imposed on the impact shell on the side of the received impact.
7. The device of claim 6 further wherein the CFM is disposed for receiving a component of force received by the impact shell based on an angle of an attachment of the CFM to the fitted capsule and an impact location on the impact shell.
8. The device of claim 1 wherein the CFM further comprises:
- a deformable member adapted to compressively deform in response to the impact force transferred between the impact shell and the fitted capsule, the deformable member having an elastic field disposed for compression.
9. The device of claim 8 wherein the deformable member is disposed in a channel, the deformable member in slidable communication with an interior surface of the channel,
- the channel having a region of a greater cross section and a region of reduced cross section, further comprising:
- a coupling between the impact shell and the deformable member, the coupling attached for directing the transferred force to the deformable member in a direction to dispose the deformable member from the region of greater cross section to the region of reduced cross section.
10. The device of claim 9 further comprising a flexible tether defining the coupling, the flexible tether adapted for transferring tensioning forces from the fitted capsule.
11. The device of claim 9 further comprising a rigid shaft defining the coupling, the rigid shaft adapted for transferring compressive forces from the impact shell.
12. The device of claim 1 wherein the CFM further comprises:
- an elongated deformable member having an annular section;
- an engaging post in slidable communication with the annular section, the annular section extending around a circumference of the engaging post for defining an elastic field;
- a coupling between the elongated deformable member and the impact shell, the coupling adapted to draw the annular section along the circumference of the engaging post.
13. The device of claim 12 wherein the annular section has a curved bias for engaging the circumference in an untensioned position, the coupling adapted to draw the annular section into a straight configuration against the curved bias.
14. The device of claim 13 wherein the annular section has a region of greater cross section and a region of reduced cross section, the area of reduced cross section responsive with less force for maintaining the curved bias than the area of greater cross section.
15. The device of claim 12 further comprising opposed engaging posts, the elongated member extending between the opposed engaging posts and having annular sections extending around each of the opposed engaging posts.
16. The device of claim 1 wherein the CFM further comprises:
- a deformable member adapted to compressively deform in response to the impact force between the impact shell and the fitted capsule, the deformable member having an elastic field disposed for compression.
Type: Application
Filed: Nov 11, 2020
Publication Date: May 6, 2021
Inventors: Christopher A. Brown (Cazenovia, NY), Tristin J. Carlton (Coventry, RI), Eric Motler (Schenectady, NY), Douglas Rives (Worcester, MA), Austin Lindner (Worcester, MA), Joshua M. Herlands (Worcester, MA), Jessica K.Y. Chen (Worcester, MA), Lorenzo M. Dube (Worcester, MA), James J. Muller (Worcester, MA), Pedro D. Oporto (Worcester, MA), Olivia G. Steen (Worcester, MA), Andrew R. Vickery (Worcester, MA)
Application Number: 17/094,978