PRESSURE-BASED PACKAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD
A pressure-based packaging system has an upper frame and a lower frame bounded by a walled containment in which they are placed to hold articles therebetween, the upper frame having spaces for receiving the tops of articles and the lower frame having spaces for receiving bottoms of articles, where either one or both of the upper and lower frames is made from folding a single sheet of material into a box-like form.
The present invention relates to the field of packaging of products by way of pressure-based and friction-fit containment systems and methods.
BACKGROUNDTypical packaging requires using a number of different containment pieces with a number of different surfaces to hold an article, typically a fragile or easily breakable object, in place while shipping, handling, and putting on display. These containment pieces tend to be plastic, Styrofoam, cardboard, bubble wrap, or combinations of the same. Additionally, these containment pieces create large amounts of waste when no longer used, are difficult to dispose without negative environmental impacts, and/or require the primary box holding the articles to use more material itself to prevent either one of the article or the containment piece from coming loose or falling out in operation.
Fragile or easily broken objects pose unique issues for consumers since their value is tied to their appearance and lack of fractures or other signs of damage from the factory to the point of sale. Thus, consumers desire packaging that allows them to fully view their fragile articles to ensure purchase of undamaged merchandise. Likewise, firms that package and/or sell such articles would desire easier means to conduct quality control on the end products leaving the factory or packaging center.
A drawback to current article packaging solutions is the failure to present a number of non-identical articles in an aesthetically appeasing arrangement within the package itself. This limitation is even more evident in the lack of such presentation-friendly packaging for fragile or easily damaged articles.
There is a need for a solution that resolves one or more of the aforementioned issues in whole or in part.
SUMMARYAn exemplary pressure-based packaging system may comprise a walled structure with an inner surface, an outer surface, and a floor. In this exemplary pressure-based packaging system, one or more openings may exist in the walled structure from the inner surface to the outer surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may have a lower frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the lower frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface of this lower frame. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may also have an upper frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the upper frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may be configured so that the spaces in the lower frame are either parallel with or concentric with the spaces in the upper frame.
An exemplary pressure-based packaging system may comprise a walled structure with an inner surface, an outer surface, a floor, and a cover for the walled structure. In this exemplary pressure-based packaging system, one or more openings may exist in the walled structure from the inner surface to the outer surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may have a lower frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the lower frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface of this lower frame. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may also have an upper frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the upper frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may be configured so that the spaces in the lower frame are either parallel with or concentric with the spaces in the upper frame.
An exemplary pressure-based packaging system may comprise a walled structure with an inner surface, an outer surface, and a floor. In this exemplary pressure-based packaging system, one or more openings may exist in the walled structure from the inner surface to the outer surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may have a lower frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the lower frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface of this lower frame. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may also have an upper frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the upper frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may be configured so that the spaces in the lower frame are either parallel with or concentric with the spaces in the upper frame and at least one of the spaces in the upper structure is a cavity from the upper surface to the lower surface.
An exemplary pressure-based packaging system may comprise a walled structure with an inner surface, an outer surface, and a floor. In this exemplary pressure-based packaging system, one or more openings may exist in the walled structure from the inner surface to the outer surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may have a lower frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the lower frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface of this lower frame. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may also have an upper frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the upper frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may be configured so that the spaces in the lower frame are either parallel with or concentric with the spaces in the upper frame and a majority of the sides of the upper frame that are bounded by the walled structure are substantially collinear with the sides of the lower frame that are bounded by the walled structure.
An exemplary pressure-based packaging system may comprise a walled structure with an inner surface, an outer surface, and a floor. In this exemplary pressure-based packaging system, one or more openings may exist in the walled structure from the inner surface to the outer surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may have a lower frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the lower frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface of this lower frame. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may also have an upper frame bounded on a plurality of sides by the inner surface of the walled structure and the upper frame has an upper surface, a lower surface, and spaces between the upper and lower surface. This exemplary pressure-based packaging system may be configured so that the spaces in the lower frame are either parallel with or concentric with the spaces in the upper frame. In this exemplary pressure-based packaging system, each of the upper frame and the lower frame is recyclable.
In the drawings like characters of reference indicate corresponding parts in the different and interchangeable and interrelated figures. Parts and components of each figure may be substitutes for other components in other figures to achieve the various methods and embodiments disclosed herein. Methods and protocols disclosed in any embodiment may be run in any order so as to affect their disclosed goals and/or enable performance of the systems as described. Additionally, any one embodiment may utilize any method or protocol described and in any portions, sequences, and combinations thereof.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONIn an embodiment illustratively exemplified by
While
With reference to the illustrative embodiment of
Referring to the illustrative embodiment of
According to the illustrative embodiment of
According to the illustrative embodiment of
Referring again to the illustrative embodiment of
Referring to the illustrative embodiment shown by
Referring still to
In the exemplary embodiment illustrated by
Referring to
With further reference to
Referring to the illustrative embodiment of
As illustratively shown in
Illustrative upper frames 30 and lower frames 50 may be made from folded sheets of cardboard that may be pressed in appropriate locations to form the aforementioned cavities 32/33, inserts 51, and space-saving/size reducing features 37 and 55 on the upper frame 30 and lower frame 50, respectively. The folding and cardboard pressing/manipulation described may be accomplished according to known techniques in the art. In a further exemplary embodiment, automation may be used to determine the resulting upper frame 30 and/or lower frame 50 for any given box 20/60 provided sufficient information is given about the dimensions of the articles and the box 20/60 into which they must fit as well as their orientation and desired viewing scheme from any openings in box 20/60.
In an exemplary embodiment, the pressure between upper frame 30 and lower frame 50 may be sufficiently created through the press-fit interaction between upper frame 30 and walls 20A/60A of an exemplary box 20/60. However, use of cover 10 and/or retainer 11 may enhance the degree of pressure exerted on an article or articles disposed between upper frame 30 and lower frame 50.
According to an exemplary methodology illustratively provided for in
Referring to the illustrative methodology of
Alternatively, according to an exemplary embodiment, system 900 may optimize the space of containment 20 for article 40 placement using one or more containment space optimization processes 905. The containment space optimization processes 905 may comprise optimization algorithms and techniques known to those skilled in the art, such as, for example, the dynamic optimization techniques and algorithms described in Ashwini R Kothawade and Manoj E Patil. Review on Cargo Space Optimization Methodologies. International Journal of Computer Applications 162(3):31-34, March 2017; Tom Jose V and Sijo M T, Praveen, “Cargo Loading using Dynamic Programming and Comparative Software Study”, International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) ISSN: 2278 7798, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 1-4, February 2013; M. Zahid Gurbuz, Selim Akyoku, Ybrahim Emiroolu and Aysun Guran, “An Efficient Algorithm for 3D Rectangular Box Packing”, Applied Automatic Systems: Proceedings of selected AAS, Skopje, pp. 131-134, September 2009; E. Kannigal, S. M. K. Srikanth and M. Sundhararajan, “Optimization Solution of Equal Dimension Boxes in Container Loading Problem using a Permutation Block Algorithm”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 7, pp. 22-26, June 2014; H Gehring and A. Bortfeldt, “A Genetic Algorithm for Solving the Container Loading Problem”, Fern University Hagen, pp. 1-24; and those of U.S. Pat. No. 6,721,762, the algorithms and techniques disclosed in each of which being incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Other similar optimization techniques known to those skilled in the art may be utilized to determine the appropriate spatial location of articles 40 within a containment 20 based on user inputs.
In an exemplary embodiment, system 900 may resort to past placement schemes stored in memory 908 and apply some or all of the same to the containment space optimization process 905. In this way, an exemplary system 900 may resort to previous packaging optimizations that are substantially the same as the instant optimization within a particular range of statistical significance (e.g., the past scheme differs from the current by less than 5% in relevant dimensions).
In another exemplary embodiment, system 900 may also retrieve data on particular articles, including their dimensions and past placement schema, from an Internet of Things (“IoT”) Server 909. For example, the system 900 may have imaging or key work search functionalities, including web crawling capabilities, to extract information needed for containment space optimization 905.
Following completion of optimization routine 905, one or more output spacing schemes 907 may be generated and selected based on user needs. The output spacing schemes may be saved in any form to allow for user appreciation of the three-dimensional placement of the articles 40 within containment 20 identified by dimensions 901. In an exemplary embodiment, the output files may be in one or more of the following formats: STL, OBJ, FBX, COLLADA, 3DS, IGES; STEP, and VRML/X3D. An exemplary system 900 may then retrieve from the chosen output file the maxima and minima perimeter(s) and height(s) of all articles 40 depicted and use these to optimize the dimensions of boundaries 50A, 50B, 51, and article spaces 52-56 of lower frame 50 via step 910. In an exemplary embodiment, the output files may be in one or more of the following formats: STL, OBJ, FBX, COLLADA, 3DS, IGES; STEP, and VRML/X3D. An exemplary system 900 may then retrieve from the chosen output file the maxima and minima perimeter(s) and height(s) of all articles 40 depicted and use these to optimize the dimensions of boundaries 30B, 31, 31A, 32, 32A, and 33 of upper frame 30 via step 920.
In an exemplary embodiment, step 910 takes place before step 920. In another exemplary embodiment, step 920 takes place before step 910. In yet another exemplary embodiment, steps 910 and 920 take place simultaneously. In a still further exemplary embodiment, steps 910 and 920 may start and end at the same time, but are processed intermittently while data analyzed during one optimization is used for optimizing data undergoing the other process. In other words, step 910 and step 920 may both start at the same time, but the finalization of step 910 may require data obtained during step 920 progression and the finalization of step 920 may require data obtained during step 910 progression. In this way, an exemplary system 900 may optimize the lower frame design 50 using the dimensions of upper frame design 30 and vice-a-versa.
In an additional exemplary embodiment, the optimization techniques previously described may be used in steps 910 and 920, with the additional parameter that the size and amount of material utilized to make frames 50 and 30 be reduced wherever possible, such as to make surfaces like 37 that reduce the amount of frame 30 material used in the final packaging 100. Additional elements to consider in the step 910/920 analysis are the dimensions and materials of containment 20, cover 10, and presence of any fixation devices 11. For example, an exemplary optimization routine 910/920 may seek to use more material for frame 30 to allow for greater weight and/or friction fitting within wall 20A of containment 20 where a fixation device 11 is not used.
With reference to
While
Many further variations and modifications may suggest themselves to those skilled in art upon making reference to above disclosure and foregoing interrelated and interchangeable illustrative embodiments, which are given by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope and spirit of the interrelated embodiments of the invention described herein.
Claims
1-20. (canceled)
21. A package system having an opening through which to view and touch objects stored therein, comprising:
- a box having at least four walls extending upwardly from a floor, wherein at least one of the at least four walls comprises the opening through its thickness, wherein the opening spans a majority of either a width of the at least one of the at least four walls or a height of the at least one of the at least four walls;
- a lower frame configured to frictionally fit within the box proximal to the floor, the lower frame having a plurality of spaces through one or more of an upper surface and a lower surface, wherein the lower frame is made from a single sheet of material that has been folded so that at least one space in the plurality of spaces faces is in a plane that is parallel with the floor; and
- an upper frame configured to frictionally fit within the box distal to the lower frame, the upper frame having a plurality of spaces through one or more of an upper surface and a lower surface, wherein the upper frame is made from a single sheet of material that has been folded so that at least one space in the plurality of spaces is either parallel to or concentric with the at least one space in the lower frame,
- wherein the opening is in a plane that is perpendicular to the plane of the at least one space in the plurality of spaces of the lower frame, wherein the opening spans a distance that is between the lower surface of the upper frame and the upper surface of the lower frame.
22. The packaging system of claim 21, further comprising a cover configured to apply pressure to the upper surface of the upper frame via the box.
23. The packaging system of claim 21, wherein at least one of the spaces in the upper frame is a cavity from the upper surface to the lower surface of the upper frame.
24. The packaging system of claim 21, wherein the upper frame comprises a plurality of sides, wherein a majority of the sides of the upper frame are substantially collinear with at least one side of the lower frame that is bounded by the walled structure.
25. The packaging system of claim 21, wherein each of the upper frame and the lower frame is recyclable.
26. The packaging system of claim 21, wherein the box has at least one additional opening separated from and perpendicular to the opening.
27. The packaging system of claim 26, wherein a portion of the at least one additional opening spans a distance perpendicular to the floor that is between the lower surface of the upper frame and the upper surface of the lower frame.
28. The packaging system of claim 21, further comprising at least one object held in place via at least one space in the upper frame and the lower frame.
29. The packaging system of claim 21, wherein the upper frame comprises at least one reducing feature.
30. The packaging system of claim 21, wherein the lower frame comprises at least one reducing feature.
31. The packaging system of claim 21, wherein each of the upper frame and a lower frame comprises at least one reducing feature.
32. The packaging system of claim 29, further comprising at least one object held in place via at least one space in the upper frame and the lower frame.
33. The packaging system of claim 30, further comprising at least one object held in place via at least one space in the upper frame and the lower frame.
34. The packaging system of claim 31, further comprising at least one object held in place via at least one space in the upper frame and the lower frame.
35. A package, comprising:
- a box having walls extending upwardly from a floor, wherein one of the walls has an opening exposing an inside of the box, the opening providing a line of sight to each of the other walls of the box when the box is empty;
- a first frame made from folded paper that slidingly contacts the walls over a majority of a perimeter of the first frame and rests on the floor;
- a second frame made from folded paper that slidingly contacts the walls over a majority of a perimeter of the second frame; the second frame being separated from the first frame by the opening and configured to be suspended above the first frame over a height that is at least as great as a height of the opening; and
- at least one object stably held within the box and touchable via the opening.
36. The package of claim 35, wherein the first frame has at least one space therein configured to fit a portion of an object.
37. The package of claim 36, wherein the second frame has at least one space therein configured to fit a portion of an object.
38. The package of claim 37, wherein the at least one space in the first frame and the at least one space in the second frame fit different portions of the object.
39. The package of claim 35, wherein the opening is less wide than either the first frame or the second frame.
40. The package of claim 35, wherein the opening is rectangular.
Type: Application
Filed: Jun 28, 2021
Publication Date: Dec 29, 2022
Inventor: Robert Anthony CATALANO (Yardley, PA)
Application Number: 17/360,635