METHODS FOR TREATING TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER
The invention is directed to methods of treating TNBC in a patient by administering to the patient an agent that inhibits the expression or activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19). In some embodiments, the agent may be a small molecule inhibitor, a polynucleotide (e.g., shRNA. siRNA), or a protein (e.g., an antibody). In some embodiments, the agent does not inhibit the activity or expression of CDK8.
This application claims benefit and is a continuation of Application No. 16/648,088 filed Mar. 17, 2020, which is a national phase application of PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/051489, filed Sep. 18, 2018, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Pat. Application No.: 62/560,140, filed Sep. 18, 2017, which applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTThis invention was made with Government support under contract W81XWH-11-1-0287 awarded by the Department of Defense; under contract W81XWH-13-1-0281 awarded by the Department of Defense; and under contract CA100225 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
REFERENCE TO A SEQUENCE LISTING[0002A] The Sequence Listing written in file 103182-1342710-000120US_Seq_Listing.xml created on Aug. 18, 2022, 81 KB, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONThe invention relates to the field of biomedicine, e.g., oncology.
BACKGROUNDTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype disproportionately affecting younger women and associated with poor prognoses. See Bauer et al. “Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry” Cancer 109, 1721-1728, doi:10.1002/cncr.22618 (2007). Despite affecting 20% of all breast cancer patients, there are currently no clinically approved targeted therapies for these patients. There exists a need in the art for effective methods of treating TNBC.
SUMMARYThe invention is directed to methods of treating TNBC in a patient by administering to the patient an agent that inhibits the expression or activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19).
In one aspect, the invention features a method of treating a patient diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) by administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits expression or activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19) and achieves at least one of a reduction in cachexia, increase in survival time, elongation in time to tumor progression, reduction in tumor mass, reduction in tumor burden and/or a prolongation in time to tumor metastasis, time to tumor recurrence, tumor response, complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, or progression free survival.
In another aspect, the invention features a method of treating a patient diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), wherein the cancer is characterized by a tumor comprising EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low epithelial cells. The method includes administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19) expression or activity, wherein the treatment reduces the number of EPCAMmed/high/ CD10-/low cells in the tumor, reduces to number of EPCAM med/high /CD10-/low cells per unit volume of the tumor, or results in a reduction of the ratio of EpCAMmed/high/CD10/low epithelial cells to normal (EpCamHi/CD10-) epithelial cells in the tumor.
In yet another aspect, the invention features a method of reducing metastasis of TNBC in a patient by administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits expression or activity of CDK19.
In some embodiments of all aspects of the invention described herein, the patient is treated with a combination therapy comprising (a) an agent that inhibits expression or activity of CDK19 and (b) radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy.
In some embodiments, the method comprises detecting EpCAMmed/hlgh/CD10-/low cells in a tissue sample from the patient prior to or after initiating therapy.
In some embodiments, the agent administered to the patient in the methods described herein does not significantly inhibit expression or activity of CDK8. In some embodiments, the agent inhibits expression or activity of CDK19 to a greater extent than it inhibits expression or activity of CDK8.
In some embodiments of the methods describe herein, the agent is a nucleic acid. In some embodiments, the agent is a protein. In some embodiments, the agent is a CRISPR/Cas9 system.
In some embodiments of the methods describe herein, the agent is a CDK19 targeting shRNA.
In some embodiments of the methods describe herein, the agent is a CDK19 targeting siRNA.
In some embodiments of the methods describe herein, the agent is a CDK19 targeting shRNA or siRNA complementary or substantially complementary to the 3′ UTR of CDK19, but not to the 3′UTR CDK8.
In some embodiments of the methods describe herein, the agent is a CDK19 targeting shRNA or siRNA complementary or substantially complementary to the coding region of CDK19, but not to the coding region of CDK8.
In some embodiments of the methods describe herein, the agent is a CDK19 targeting shRNA or siRNA selected from: SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 4, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, SEQ ID NO: 7, SEQ ID NO: 8, SEQ ID NO: 9, SEQ ID NO: 10, or SEQ ID NO: 11.
In some embodiments, the agent binds CDK19 in the cytoplasm of a breast epithelial cell.
In another aspect, the invention also features a method of predicting the likely therapeutic responsiveness of a subject with TNBC to a CDK19 targeting agent. The method includes (a) quantitating EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells in a tumor sample obtained from the subject; (b) comparing the quantity of EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells in (a) to a reference value characteristic of tumors responsive to a CDK19 targeting therapy, and treating the patient with the CDK19 targeting agent if the quantity of EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells is equal to or exceeds the reference value. In some embodiments, the CDK19 targeting agent is an inhibitor of CDK19 expression or activity
We have discovered that reducing expression or activity of CDK19 in TNBC cell lines or breast cancer patient derived xenografts in mice inhibits growth and metastases of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) tumors. See §4 below (Examples). We have also shown that the biological functions of CDK19 are distinct from those of its paralog, CDK8, and that the CDK19-mediated effect on TNBC tumors is independent of CDK8 activity. These data demonstrate that TNBC can be treated by agents that inhibit CDK19 but do not inhibit CDK8, or agents that preferentially inhibit CDK19 compared to CDK8. The discovery that inhibition of CDK19 is necessary and sufficient for inhibition of TNBC growth and metastases is significant, in part, because of the potential advantages of CDK19 as a therapeutic target. Compared to other ubiquitous transcriptional co-factors, such as CDK8, CDK9, and BRD4, CDK19 has more limited tissue distribution, suggesting reduced toxicity and a broader therapeutic window for CDK19 inhibitors.
In addition to demonstrating that CDK19 knockdown had tumor growth inhibitory effects, CDK19 expression was also shown to be enriched in tumor initiating cells, e.g., tumorigenic cells having EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low expressions, compared to the less tumorigenic cells, e.g., cells having EPCAMlow/med/CD10low/+ expressions (see, e.g., Example 4). Further studies also showed that CDK19 knockdown significantly decreased tumor initiating frequencies (
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer subtype characterized by lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2). Receptor expression can be measured by immunohistochemical staining or other methods. TNBC is generally a diagnosed by exclusion. Widely used breast cancer therapies that target these receptors are not effective against TNBC, making TNBC treatment particularly challenging.
2.2 Cyclic-Dependent Kinase 19 (CDK19)Cyclic-Dependent Kinase 19 (CDK19) is described in Broude et al., Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 15:739, 2015 and Sato et al., Molecular Cell 14:685-691, 2004. CDK19 belongs to a subset of the CDK family that is reportedly more associated with regulation of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription (see, e.g., Galbraith et al., Transcription 1: 4-12, 2010) than cell cycle progression. See UniProt entry NP_055891.1; Genbank entries AY028424 & AL603914. The mRNA sequences for CDK19 are also disclosed herein (e.g., SEQ ID NOs:12 -15).
2.3 Cyclic-Dependent Kinase 8 (CDK8)CDK8 is a paralog of CDK19 with 84% amino acid sequence homology to CDK19. See
As used here, the term “agent” refers to a biological molecule (e.g., nucleic acids, proteins, peptides, antibodies) or small organic molecule (e.g., having a molecular weight less than 1000, usually less than 500) that can reduce or inhibit the expression or activity of CDK19.
2.5 InhibitorsAs used herein, the term “inhibitor” as used in the context of CDK19, refers to a compound, composition or system that reduces the expression or activity of CDK19. An agent may also selectively inhibit CDK19 expression or activity over that of CDK8.
2.6 KnockdownAs used herein, the term “knock down” refers to a reduction in the expression level of the CDK19 gene. Knocking down CDK19 gene expression level may be achieved by reducing the amount of mRNA transcript corresponding to the gene, leading to a reduction in the expression level of CDK19 protein. Knocking down CDK19 gene expression level may also be achieved by reducing the amount of CDK19 protein. An knockdown agent is an example of an inhibitor.
2.7 KnockoutAs used herein, the term “knock out” refers to deleting all or a portion of the CDK19 gene in a cell, in a way that interferes with the function of the CDK19 gene. For example, a knock out can be achieved by altering the CDK19 sequence. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate how to use various genetic approaches, e.g., CRISPR/Cas systems, to knockout the CDK19 gene or a portion thereof. An knockout agent is an example of an inhibitor.
2.8 Reduction Relative to a Reference LevelAs used here, the terms “decrease,” “reduced,” “reduction,” and “decreasing” are all used herein to refer to a decrease by at least 10% as compared to a reference level, for example a decrease by at least about 5%, at least about 10%, at least about 20%, or at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at least about 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 80%, or at least about 90% or up to and including a 100% decrease (i.e. absent level as compared to a reference sample), or any decrease between 10-100% as compared to a reference level.
2.9 Nucleic AcidsAs used herein, the terms “polynucleotide,” “nucleic acid,” and “oligonucleotide” are used interchangeably and refer to a polymeric form of nucleotides of any length, either deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides or analogs thereof. A polynucleotide can comprise modified nucleotides, such as methylated nucleotides and nucleotide analogs, or otherwise be modified by art-known methods to render the polynucleotide resistant to nucleases, improve delivery of the polynucleotide to target cells or tissues, improve stability, reduce degradation, improve tissue distribution or to impart other advantageous properties. For example, the DNA or RNA polynucleotide may include one or more modifications on the oligonucleotide backbone (e.g., a phosphorothioate modification), the sugar (e.g., a locked sugar), or the nucleobase. If present, modifications to the nucleotide structure can be imparted before or after assembly of the oligonucleotide. The sequence of nucleotides can be interrupted by non-nucleotide components. An oligonucleotide can be further modified after polymerization, such as by conjugation with a label component, a targeting component, or other component. Polynucleotides may be double-stranded or single-stranded molecules. Furthermore, in order to improve the oligonucleotide delivery, the DNA or RNA oligonucleotide may be packaged into a lipid molecule (e.g., lipid nanoparticles) or be conjugated to a cell-penetrating peptide.
2.10 TreatmentAs used herein, the terms “treatment,” “treating,” and the like, refer to obtaining a desired pharmacologic and/or physiologic effect. The effect may be prophylactic in terms of completely or partially preventing a disease or symptom thereof and/or may be therapeutic in terms of a partial or complete cure for a disease and/or adverse effect attributable to the disease. “Treatment,” as used herein, can include treatment resulting in inhibiting the disease, i.e., arresting its development; and relieving the disease, i.e., causing regression of the disease. For example, in the case of cancer, a response to treatment can include a reduction in cachexia, increase in survival time, elongation in time to tumor progression, reduction in tumor mass, reduction in tumor burden and/or a prolongation in time to tumor metastasis, time to tumor recurrence, tumor response, complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, progression free survival, overall survival, each as measured by standards set by the National Cancer Institute and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the approval of new drugs and/or described in Eisenhauer, EA1, et al. “New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).” European journal of cancer 45.2 (2009): 228-247.
2.11 AdministrationAs used herein, the term “administering” or “administration” includes any route of introducing or delivering an agent that inhibits the expression or activity of CDK19 to the subject diagnosed with TNBC. Administration can be carried out by any route suitable for the delivery of the agent. Thus, delivery routes can include, e.g., intravenous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous deliver. In some embodiments, the agent is administered directly to the tumor, e.g., by injection into the tumor.
2.12 Therapeutically Effective DoseAs used here, the term “therapeutically effective amount” refers to an amount, e.g., pharmaceutical dose, effective in inducing a desired biological effect in a subject or patient or in treating a patient having TNBC described herein. The term “therapeutically effective amount” refers to an amount of an active agent being administered that will treat to some extent a disease, disorder, or condition, e.g., TNBC, relieve one or more of the symptoms of the disease being treated, and/or that amount that will prevent, to some extent, one or more of the symptoms of the disease that the subject being treated has or is at risk of developing. For example, for a given parameter (e.g., tumor volume, tumor diameter, metastases, etc.), a therapeutically effective amount will show an increase or decrease of therapeutic effect of at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100%, or at least 1-fold, 2-fold, or 3-fold. A therapeutically effective dose is usually delivered over a course of therapy that may extend for a period of days, weeks, or months. A therapeutically effective dose of an agent may be taken alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents. In some cases, a therapeutically effective amount of a CDK19 inhibitor is am amount sufficient to effect a partial response in a patient with TNBC (e.g., a greater than 20% reduction, sometimes a greater than 30% reduction, in the measurable diameter of lesions).
2.13 Patient or SubjectA “patient” or “subject,” as used herein, is intended to include either a human or non-human animal, preferably a mammal, e.g., non-human primate. Most preferably, the subject or patient is a human.
2.14 Antisense StrandA “antisense strand” refers to the strand of a double stranded RNAi agent (siRNA or shRNA) which includes a region that is complementary or substantially complementary to a target sequence (e.g., a human CDK8 or CDK19 mRNA including a 5′ UTR, exons of an open reading frame (ORF), or a 3′ UTR). Where the region of “complementarity” or “substantially complementary” need not be fully complementary to the target sequence and may have sequence % identity or % similarity of least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 100%.
2.15 Sense StrandA “sense strand,” as used herein, refers to the strand of a RNAi agent (siRNA or shRNA) that includes a region that is complementary or substantially complementary to a region of the antisense strand.
3. Methods of TreatmentIn one approach the invention provides a method of treating a patient diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), comprising administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits expression or activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19). In some embodiments, the treatment results in an at least 10% reduction in tumor volume within 6 month of initiating therapy.
In one approach the invention provides a method of treating a patient diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), wherein the cancer is characterized by a tumor comprising EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low epithelial cells, the method comprising administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19) expression or activity, wherein the treatment results in a reduction of the ratio of cells having a medium to high expression level of EpCAM and a low expression level of CD10 to normal cells in the tumor. In some embodiments, the method includes the step of detecting EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low epithelial cells in a tissue sample from the patient prior to or after initiating therapy.
To determine the phenotype of a tumor or to assess treatment prognosis, a biopsy may be obtained from the patient diagnosed with TNBC. A biopsy may be a needle biopsy, or may be a liquid biopsy be obtained from blood vessels and/or lymph nodes that supply the breast, e.g., internal mammary arteries, lateral thoracic arteries, thoracoacromial arteries, axillary lymph nodes.
As described in §4, below, CD10 and EpCAM biomarkers identify three distinct sub-populations of Tumor Initiating Cells (TICs) in TNBC. EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low, EPCAMlow/med/CD10low/+, and EpCAM-/CD10. The phenotype of cancer cells in a TNBC patient can be determined using art-known methods. In one approach a tissue is obtained from the patient and the cell phenotype determined using immunohistochemistry, mass spectrometry analysis, fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) or other methods. The cell phenotype can be assigned relative to standard values characteristic of health or cancerous tissue. In one approach the ratio of EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells to normal breast epithelial cells is determined prior to initiation of treatment to assess the likely response of the patient to CDK19 targeted therapy. In one approach a change in the ratio of EpCAMmed/high /CD10-/low cells to normal cells, or a change in the quantity of EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells per volume tissue is detected after initiation of treatment.
In one approach the invention provides a method for reducing metastasis of TNBC in a patient, the method comprising administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits expression or activity of CDK19
In some embodiments, methods of the invention may be used to treat inflammatory TNBCs or TNBCs that are chemo-resistant. In other embodiments, the methods of the invention may be used to slow down or prevent the metastasis of TNBCs. In further embodiments, the methods described herein that target the CDK19 gene or its corresponding protein may further modulate clinically relevant TNBC pathways regulated by CDK19, such as P53 signaling, KRAS signaling, androgen response, NOTCH signaling, TGF BETA signaling, and IL6-JAK-STAT3 signaling (
As demonstrated in the examples, the CDK19 gene is essential for the growth of TNBC. Methods of treating TNBC in a subject as described herein may be accomplished by administering a polynucleotide (e.g., oligonucleotide) to the subject to decrease or inhibit the expression of the CDK19 gene. In some embodiments, the polynucleotide may be, for example, a DNA oligonucleotide or an RNA oligonucleotide. In other embodiments, the oligonucleotide may be used in a CRISPR/Cas system. An oligonucleotide that inhibits or decreases the expression of the CDK19 gene may knock out or knock down the CDK19 gene (e.g., the CDK19 gene in a TNBC cell) in the subject.
In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide may be an shRNA or an miRNA. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide may mediate an RNase H-dependent cleavage of the mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene. In other embodiments, the oligonucleotide may be used in a CRISPR/Cas system.
In some embodiments, the mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene may be targeted for cleavage and degradation. Different portions of the mRNA transcript may be targeted to decrease or inhibit the expression of the CDK19 gene. In some embodiments, a DNA oligonucleotide may be used to target the mRNA transcript and form a DNA:RNA duplex with the mRNA transcript. The duplex may then be recognized and the mRNA cleaved by specific proteins in the cell. In other embodiments, an RNA oligonucleotide may be used to target the mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene.
3.1.1.1. shRNAA short hairpin RNA or small hairpin RNA (shRNA) is an artificial RNA molecule with a hairpin turn that can be used to silence target gene expression via the small interfering RNA (siRNA) it produced in cells. See, e.g., Fire et. al., Nature 391:806-811, 1998; Elbashir et. Al., Nature 411:494-498, 2001; Chakraborty et al. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 8:132-143, 2017;, Bouard et al., Br. J. Pharmacol. 157:153-165, 2009. Expression of shRNA in cells is typically accomplished by delivery of plasmids or through viral or bacterial vectors. Suitable bacterial vectors include but not limited to adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), adenoviruses, and lentiviruses. Once the vector has integrated into the host genome, the shRNA is then transcribed in the nucleus by polymerase II or polymerase III depending on the promoter choice. The resulting pre-shRNA is exported from the nucleus and then processed by Dicer and loaded into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The sense strand is degraded by RISC and the antisense strand directs RISC to an mRNA that has a complementary sequence. A protein called Ago2 in the RISC then cleaves the mRNA, or in some cases, represses translation of the mRNA, thus, leading to its destruction and an eventual reduction in the protein encoded by the mRNA. Thus, the shRNA leads to targeted gene silencing. shRNA is an advantageous mediator of siRNA in that it has relatively low rate of degradation and tu rnover.
In some embodiments, the methods described herein include treating TNBC in a subject using an shRNA. The methods may include administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of a vector, wherein the vector includes a polynucleotide encoding an shRNA capable of hybridizing to a portion of an mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene. In some embodiments, the vector may also include appropriate expression control elements known in the art, including, e.g., promoters (e.g., tissue specific promoters), enhancers, and transcription terminators. Once the vector is delivered to the TNBC cell, the shRNA may be integrated into the cell’s genome and undergo downstream processing by Dicer and RISC (described in detail further herein) to eventually hybridize to the mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene, leading to mRNA cleavage and degradation. In some embodiments, the shRNA may include a nucleic acid sequence that has at least 85% sequence identity to the sequence of GCGAGAATTGAAGTACCTTAA (SEQ ID NO: 1) or the sequence of ACCAGCAAATATCCTAGTAAT (SEQ ID NO: 2). In particular embodiments, the shRNA may target the amino acids at the N-terminus of an mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene. In other embodiments, the shRNA may target the amino acids at an internal region of an mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene.
As demonstrated in the Examples, e.g.,
In some embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GCGAGAATTGAAGTACCTTAA (SEQ ID NO: 1). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to ACCAGCAAATATCCTAGTAAT (SEQ ID NO: 2). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GCTTGTAGAGAGATTGTACTT (SEQ ID NO: 3). In some embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GAGGACTGATAGTTCTTCTTT (SEQ ID NO: 4). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GATATTAGAAAGATGCCAGAA (SEQ ID NO: 5). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GCCAACAGTAGCCTCATAAAG (SEQ ID NO: 6). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to CGTTCGTATTTATCTAGTTTC (SEQ ID NO: 7). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GCATGACTTGTGGCATATTAT (SEQ ID NO: 8). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GCTTGTAGAGAGATTGCACTT (SEQ ID NO: 9). In other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to AGGACTGATAGCTCTTCTTTA (SEQ ID NO: 10). In yet other embodiments, an shRNA targeted against the CDK19 gene may have at least 85% sequence identity (e.g., 87%, 89%, 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, or 99% sequence identity) to GTATGGCTGCTGTTTGATTAT (SEQ ID NO: 11). One of skill in the art has the knowledge and capability to design shRNAs that target different portions of the CDK19 gene (e.g., the 5′ UTR region or the 3′ UTR region) to achieve the desired reduction in expression of the gene. For example, available tools for designing shRNAs include, e.g., Project Insilico, Genomics and Bioinformatics Group, LMP, CCR, NIH. In some embodiments, an shRNA may be designed to knockout the CDK19 gene.
CDK8 and CDK19 shRNAThere are a number of structural elements that can affect shRNA efficacy. For specific RNAi knockdown of a desired target gene an shRNA can be designed in consideration of its multiple structural elements. Generally, an shRNA should be about 80 nucleotides in length and designed (from 5′ to 3′) to comprise of the following structural elements to make the hairpin structure of the shRNA: (1) a sense strand (e.g., upper stem); (2) followed by a hairpin loop; (3) an antisense strand (e.g., lower stem or guide strand) that has perfect or near perfect complementary to the target mRNA and is antisense to the target mRNA; (4-5) two cleavage motifs such as, “U” or “UH” at the first position of the guide strand, and “UUC” or “CUUC” at the tail region of the guide strand; and (6) arbitrary spacer nucleotides of about two nucleotides in length between the first nucleotide of guide strand “U” motif and the hairpin loop, and between the last nucleotide of the sense strand and the hairpin loop. The sense strand and antisense strand, making up the stem, may be designed to consist of a range from about 19 to 29 nucleotides in length, which will form the stem. The loop structure may be designed to consist of a range about 2 to 15 nucleotides in length, and preferably free of any internal secondary structure. Some examples of sequences that may be used for making the hairpin loop, include but are not limited to, a nine nucleotide loop comprising the sequence (TTCAAGAGA), and a seven nucleotide loop comprising the sequence (TCAAGAG). Other design strategies can be found in the relevant disclosure of Ros XB-D, Gu S. Guidelines for the optimal design of miRNA-based shRNAs. Methods (San Diego, Calif) 2016;103:157-166, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. There are also several design programs available such as, The RNAi Consortium software from The Broad Institute, which is made available through Sigma-Aldrich and Thermo-Fisher Scientific.
The specificity of the target sequence should also be considered, as many mRNAs can share similar sequences. Care should be taken in selecting target sequence that has low sequence homology to other genes in the genome to allow for gene-specific knockdown. Where a gene has multiple forms, to achieve complete knockdown of gene expression, shRNA should target sequences shared among all isoforms of the target mRNA.
An alignment of CDK19 and CDK8 mRNA sequences can identify not identical or low percent identity or similarity nucleotide sequence regions which can be used to design shRNAs that have a preference to target to CDK19 mRNA but not CDK8, see for example the 3′ UTR and 5′ UTR alignments in
In some embodiments, shRNA that targets a CDK19 mRNA transcript, and not of CDK8 mRNA transcript can be designed. In one approach the mRNA sequences for human CDK19 and CDK8 from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, found at Pubmed.gov) and an alignmenti is performed (e.g., with pairwise alignment program such as, LALIGN). A region of about 19 to 29 contiguous nucleotides (e.g., 19-20, 19-21, 19-22, 19-23, 19-24, 19-25, 19-26, 19-27, 19-28, or 19-29) in length is selected based on low sequence identity (e.g., less than 75%, identity, sometimes less than 70% identity, sometimes less than 60% identity. In some embodiments the 19 to 29 nt region has very low (e.g., less than 40%, less than 30% or less than 20% or sequence identity. The contiguous sequence can be in a protein coding region, the 5′-UTR, the 3′-UTR, or span two regions.
In one embodiment, target-specific knockdown of CDK19 can be accomplished by designing an shRNA with a guide strand that is complementary of the 3′ UTR region of CDK19 (SEQ ID NO:42) and has low or no homology to the 3′UTR of CDK8 (SEQ ID NO:44). The guide strand may be 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, or 29 nucleotides in length. Some exemplary sequence regions that may be used to design a CDK19 shRNA, include but are not limited to, CTCCAGCTCCCGTTGGGCCAGGCCAGCCC (SEQ ID NO: 20), AGCCCAGAGCACA GGCTCCAGCAATATGT (SEQ ID NO: 21), CTGCATTGAAAAGAACCAAAAAAATGCAA (SEQ ID NO: 22), ACTATGATGCCATTTCTATCTAAAACTCA (SEQ ID NO: 23), TACACATGGGAG GAAAACCTTATATACTG (SEQ ID NO: 24), AGCATTGTGCAGGACTGATAGCTCTTCTT (SEQ ID NO: 25), TATTGACTTAAAGAAGATTCTTGTGAAGT (SEQ ID NO: 26), TTCCCCTATCTCAGCA CCCCTTCCCTGCA (SEQ ID NO: 27), TGTGTTCCATTGTGACTTCTCTGATAAAG (SEQ ID NO: 28), CGTCTGATCTAATCCCAGCACTTCTGTAA (SEQ ID NO: 29), or CCTTCAGCATTTCTTT GAAGGATTCTATC (SEQ ID NO: 30). One of ordinary skill guided by this disclosure understands that other low homology sequence regions in the ‘3 UTR could also be used. See, for example,
To make shRNAs that preferentially target CDK19 one would identify a unique region of CDK19, a region that does not have significant homology to other CDKs (e.g., CDK8) or other mRNAs in the genome. One would use this sequence to make a guide strand that is antisense to this target and comprises 19 to 29 nucleotides in length. To make the expression cassette one would add an appropriate promoter such as a pol II or pol III promotor at the beginning of the cassette, followed by the complementary sense strand (e.g., complementary to the targeting guide strand), which is them followed by the loop structure of about 2 to 15 nucleotides in length. In addition, the two Ago cleavage motifs, “U” or “UH” should be included at the first position of the guide strand, and “UUC” or “CUUC” at the tail region of the guide strand along to 1-2 spacer nucleotides at the end of the loop structure. See, for example US Application No. US2008/0293142 and Ros XB-D, Gu S. Guidelines for the optimal design of miRNA-based shRNAs. Methods (San Diego, Calif) 2016;103:157-166, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
In another embodiment, target-specific knockdown of CDK8 can be performed by using an shRNA with a guide strand that comprises a complementary to the 5′UTR of CDK8 (SEQ ID NO: 43) and has low or no homology to the 5′ UTR of CDK19 (SEQ ID NO:41). The guide strand may be 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 or 29, nucleotides in length. Some exemplary sequences that may be used to design a CDK8 shRNA include but are not limited to, TGGCCGCCCCGCCGCTCCCGCCGCAGCAG (SEQ ID NO: 31), GAGCAGAACGCGCGGCCGGAGA GAGCGGC (SEQ ID NO: 32), GGAGCCGGCGCCCAGGGAGCCCGCGGGGA (SEQ ID NO: 33), CAAGGGCAGAGACACCGCTCCCCACCCCC (SEQ ID NO: 34),AGCCCTCGTCCCTCGGCTCTCCTTCGCCG (SEQ ID NO: 35), GGGGATCCTCCCCGTTCCTCCACCCCCGG (SEQ ID NO: 36), CCGGCCTCTG CCCCGCCGTCCCCCTGGAT (SEQ ID NO: 37), GTCCCTGGCGCTTTCGCGGGGCCTCCTCC (SEQ ID NO: 38), TGCTCTTGCCGCATCAGTCGGGCTGGTGC (SEQ ID NO: 39), or TGCGGCCGGCGGGCGTAGAGC GGGCGGGT (SEQ ID NO: 40). One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that other low homology sequence regions in the ‘5 UTR could also be used. See, for example,
To make shRNAs that preferentially target CDK8 one would identify a unique region of CDK8, a region that does not have significant homology to other CDKs (e.g., CDK19) or other mRNAs in the genome. One would use this sequence to make a guide strand that is antisense to this target and comprises 19 to 29 nucleotides in length. To make the expression cassette one would add an appropriate promoter such as a pol II or pol III promotor at the beginning of the cassette, followed by the complementary sense strand (e.g., complementary to the targeting guide strand), which is them followed by the loop structure of about 2 to 15 nucleotides in length. In addition, the two Ago cleavage motifs, “U” or “UH” should be included at the first position of the guide strand, and “UUC” or “CUUC” at the tail region of the guide strand along to 1-2 spacer nucleotides at the end of the loop structure. See, for example US Application No. US2008/0293142 and Ros XB-D, Gu S. Guidelines for the optimal design of miRNA-based shRNAs. Methods (San Diego, Calif) 2016;103:157-166, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
The specificity or knockdown level of an shRNA or siRNA can be confirmed using real-time PCR analysis for mRNA level or ELISA assay for the protein level. Experimental controls may be run in parallel to assess knockdown. Some examples of experimental controls that may be used, include but are not limited to, a mock-infected or mock-transfected sample, an empty vector, an shRNA encoding a scrambled target or seed region, an shRNA targeting another gene entirely such as, housekeeping genes GAPDH or Actin, or a GFP positive control.
To determine if an siRNA or shRNA (e.g., RNAi agent) preferentially targets CDK19 over CDK8 one can transfect or transduce the shRNA or siRNA tagged to marker such as GFP in a cell line or other expression system, select the GFP positive cells (e.g. transformed cells), and determine the level of CDK19 knockdown relative to CDK19 expression in the cell system without transfection or transduction with the RNAi agent. In some embodiments, the expression of RNA is measured. In other embodiments, the expression of the protein is measured. In one example, mRNA may be measured by any PCR-based assay known in the art (e.g., RT-PCR or qRT-PCR or the like). In one example, the protein level may be measured by an immunoassay (e.g., ELISA assay or any antibody-based method known in the art).
In some embodiments, a targeting CDK19 shRNA or siRNA results in CDK19 expression less than about 30% and CDK8 greater than about 70% relative to a system without transfection or transduction. In some other embodiments, a targeting CDK19 shRNA or siRNA results in CDK19 expression at less than about 50% and CDK8 greater than about 95%. In some embodiments, a targeting CDK19 shRNA or siRNA results in CDK19 expression less than about 5% and CDK8 greater than about 80%. In some embodiments, a targeting CDK19 shRNA or siRNA results in CDK19 expression less than about 1% and CDK8 greater than about 60%. In some embodiments, a targeting CDK19 shRNA or siRNA results in CDK19 expression at less than about 0.5% and CDK8 greater than about 90%. In some embodiments, a targeting CDK19 shRNA results in CDK19 expression at about 0% and CDK8 at about 100% relative to a system without transfection or transduction. In some embodiments, the expression of RNA is measured. In other embodiments, the expression of the protein is measured.
CDK8 and CDK19 siRNAThe present disclosure also provides siRNA-based therapeutics for inhibiting expression of CDK8 and CDK19 in a patient with triple-negative breast cancer. The double stranded RNAi therapeutic includes a sense strand complementary to an antisense strand. The sense or antisense strands of the siRNA may be about 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleotides in length. The antisense strand of the siRNA-based therapeutic includes a region complementary to a part of an mRNA encoding CDK8 or CDK19. Additional methods to make therapeutic siRNA can be found in U.S. Pat No. US9399775, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
In some cases, the expression of CDK19 siRNA may result in a knockdown of CDK19 at least about 25%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%. In another embodiment, the expression of CDK19 siRNA may preferentially knockdown CDK19 compared to CDK8. In some cases, the expression of CDK8 siRNA may result in a knockdown of CDK8 at least about 25%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%.
In a preferred embodiment, CDK19 siRNA may result in a knockdown of CDK19 at least about 25%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% and CDK8 at least about 10%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%, 24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%, or 30%.
shRNA and siRNA DeliveryDepending on whether transient or stable expression is desired one can select an appropriate delivery vector. Examples of delivery vectors that may be used with the present disclosure are viral vectors, plasmids, exosomes, liposomes, bacterial vectors, or nanoparticles. The present disclosure also provides for delivery by any means known in the art.
For targeted delivery to triple-negative breast cancer cells, one skilled in the art would appreciate that delivery vectors may be genetically modified to target a specific cell type or to tissue type. To make a targeted delivery vector or plasmid one can identify a unique molecule expressed or associated with a triple-negative breast cancer (e.g., receptor, protein, glycoprotein, or combination thereof) and then create a delivery vector or plasmid that harbors or expresses these markers, preferably on the outside of the delivery vector or plasmid (e.g., cytosol facing). In addition, depending on the required therapeutic duration a viral delivery vector can be genetically modified to be continuously replicating, replication-defective, or conditionally replicating as described in, Sliva K, Schnierle BS. Selective gene silencing by viral delivery of short hairpin RNA. Virology Journal. 2010.
In one embodiment, the CDK8 or CDK19 shRNA or siRNA can be delivered by an adenovirus vector. Adenoviruses non-enveloped viruses with a nucleocapsid and a linear dsDNA genome. While they are able to replicate in the nucleus of mammalian cells, they do not efficiently integrate into the host’s genome and therefore pose only minimal risks of insertional mutagenesis but are inadequate for long-term therapy.
In another embodiment, the CDK8 or CDK19 shRNA or siRNA can be delivered by an adeno-associated viral vector (AAV). AAV is one of the smallest viruses and belongs to the genus Dependovirus. It has a small, single-stranded DNA genome and can accommodate about eight individual shRNA. AAV permits entry retargeting, allowing delivery of the shRNA to specific cell or tissue types. In a further embodiment, the present disclosure provides for a modified AAV that is targeted for delivery to a triple-negative breast cancer cell or tissue type.
In another embodiment, the CDK8 or CDK19 shRNA or siRNA can be delivered by a retrovirus vector. A retrovirus is a single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the family of Retroviridae and replicate through a double-stranded DNA intermediate. They can integrate into a host’s genome thereby allowing long-term expression of a shRNA. The Env protein plays a central role in targeting retrovirus to a target cell. In a further embodiment, the present disclosure provides for a retrovirus vector with a modified env gene or its protein product for delivery to a triple-negative breast cancer cell or tissue type. In a further embodiment, the present disclosure provides for delivery of CDK8 or CDK19 shRNA of siRNA using a retrovirus vector with protease-activated Env proteins.
In another embodiment, the CDK8 or CDK19 shRNA or siRNA can be delivered by a lentivirus vector. Lentivirus is a subclass of retrovirus in the genus Lentivirinae which can accommodate large amounts of DNA. For some applications, it may be preferable to use a lentivirus vector engineered to be “self-inactivating” known as “SIN” vectors. In a further embodiment, the present disclosure provides for delivery of a CDK8 or CDK19 shRNA by a lentivirus vector with a modified env gene or its protein product for delivery to a triple-negative breast cancer cell or tissue type.
In another embodiment, the shRNA or siRNA can be delivered by a nanoparticle. Examples of nanoparticles that can be use with the present disclosure, include but are not limited to, exosomes, liposomes, organic nanoparticles, or inorganic nanoparticles. Other non-limiting examples of nanoparticles include, but are not limited to, e.g., those provided in Hong, Cheol Am, and Yoon Sung Nam. “Functional Nanostructures for Effective Delivery of Small Interfering RNA Therapeutics.” Theranostics 4.12 (2014): 1211-1232. PMC. Web. 13 Sept. 2018, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. In some embodiments, the delivery of the shRNA or siRNA is mediated by receptor, protein, glycoprotein or combination thereof present or specific to triple-negative breast cancer cells.
In some embodiments, the siRNA CDK19 therapeutic is administered in a solution. The siRNA may be administered in an unbuffered solution. In one embodiment, the siRNA is administered in water. In other embodiments, the siRNA is administered with a buffer solution, such as an acetate buffer, a citrate buffer, a prolamine buffer, a carbonate buffer, or a phosphate buffer or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the buffer solution is phosphate buffered saline.
3.1.1.2. Rnase H-Mediated MRNA Degradation/AntisenseRNase H-dependent antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are single-stranded, chemically modified oligonucleotides that bind to complementary sequences in target mRNAs and reduce gene expression both by RNase H-mediated cleavage of the target RNA and by inhibition of translation by steric blockade of ribosomes.
RNase H is an endonuclease enzyme that catalyzes the cleavage of RNA in an RNA:DNA duplex. The most well studied endogenous function for this enzyme is the removal of Okazaki fragments (small RNAs) used to prime the DNA duplication during cell division. In some embodiments, to target the mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene for degradation, a nucleic acid (e.g., DNA oligonucleotide) capable of hybridizing to a portion of the mRNA may be administered to the subject. Once inside the cell (e.g., a TNBC cell), the DNA oligonucleotide base pairs with its targeted mRNA transcript. RNase H may bind to the resulting duplex and cleave the mRNA transcript at one or more places. The DNA oligonucleotide may further bind to other mRNA transcripts to target them for RNase H degradation. Thus, the expression of the CDK19 gene may be greatly reduced in a subject with TNBC.
The DNA oligonucleotide capable of hybridizing to an mRNA transcript of a CDK19 gene may contain, e.g., between 10 and 30 nucleotides (e.g., 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, or 30 nucleotides). In some embodiments, the DNA oligonucleotide may have 100% complementarity to the portion of the mRNA transcript it binds. In other embodiments, the DNA oligonucleotide may have less than 100% complementarity (e.g., 95%, 90%, 85%, 80%, 75%, or 70% complementarity) to the portion of the mRNA transcript it binds, but can still form a stable RNA:DNA duplex for the RNase H to cleave the mRNA transcript. The DNA oligonucleotide may bind to the 5′ UTR or the 3′ UTR of the mRNA transcript of the CDK19 gene.
Further, the DNA oligonucleotide capable of hybridizing to an mRNA transcript of a CDK19 gene may contain modified nucleotides at the 5′ end and the 3′ end. The modified nucleotides at the termini may function to protect the internal portion of the DNA oligonucleotide from nuclease degradation and to increase the binding affinity for the target mRNA transcript. In some embodiments, the modified nucleotides at the termini may include a modified nucleobase (e.g., 5-methylcytosine) and/or a modified sugar (e.g., a locked sugar). In some embodiments, 3-5 nucleotides at each of the 5′ and 3′ ends of the DNA oligonucleotide may be modified.
3.1.1.3. miRNAA microRNA (miRNA) is a small non-coding RNA molecule that functions in RNA silencing and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. miRNAs base pair with complementary sequences within the mRNA transcript. As a result, the mRNA transcript may be silenced by one or more of the mechanisms such as cleavage of the mRNA strand, destabilization of the mRNA through shortening of its poly(A) tail, and decrease translation efficiency of the mRNA transcript into proteins by ribosomes. In some embodiments, miRNAs resemble the siRNAs of the shRNA pathway, except that miRNAs derive from regions of RNA transcripts that fold back on themselves to form short hairpins, which are also called pri-miRNA. Once transcribed as pri-miRNA, the hairpins are cleaved out of the primary transcript in the nucleus by an enzyme called Drosha. The hairpins, or pre-miRNA, are then exported from the nucleus into the cytosol. In the cytosol, the loop of the hairpin is cleaved off by an enzyme called Dicer. The resulting product is now a double strand RNA with overhangs at the 3′ end, which is then incorporated into RISC. Once in the RISC, the second strand is discarded and the miRNA that is now in the RISC is a mature miRNA, which binds to mRNAs that have complementary sequences.
The difference between miRNAs and siRNAs from the shRNA pathway is that base pairing with miRNAs comes from the 5′ end of the miRNA, which is also referred to as the seed sequence. Since the seed sequence is short, each miRNA may target many more mRNA transcript. In some embodiments, an miRNA targeting the CDK19 gene may be used in methods described herein.
3.1.2. Crispr/Cas SystemIn some embodiments, the knocking out or knocking down of the CDK19 gene is performed using a gene editing system such as the CRISPR/Cas system. See Sanders and Joung, Nature Biotechnol 32:347-355, 2014, Huang et al., J Cell Physiol 10:1-17, 2017 and Mitsunobu et al., Trends Biotechnol 17:30132-30134, 2017. The CRISPR/Cas system includes a Cas protein and at least one or two ribonucleic acids that are capable of directing the Cas protein to and hybridizing to a target motif in the CDK19 sequence. The Cas protein then cleaves the target motif and results in a double-strand break or a single-strand break. Any CRISPR/Cas system that is capable of altering a target polynucleotide sequence in a cell can be used in methods described here. In some embodiments, the CRISPR/Cas system is a CRISPR type I system. In some embodiments, the CRISPR/Cas system is a CRISPR type II system. In some embodiments, the CRISPR/Cas system is a CRISPR type V system.
The Cas protein used in the methods described herein can be a naturally occurring Cas protein or a functional derivative thereof. A “functional derivative” includes, but are not limited to, fragments of a native sequence and derivatives of a native sequence polypeptide and its fragments, provided that they have a biological activity in common with the corresponding native sequence polypeptide. A biological activity contemplated herein is the ability of the functional derivative to hydrolyze a DNA substrate (e.g., a CDK19 gene) into fragments. The term “derivative” encompasses both amino acid sequence variants of polypeptide, covalent modifications, and fusions thereof. Suitable derivatives of a Cas protein or a fragment thereof include but are not limited to mutants, fusions, or covalent modifications of Cas protein.
In some embodiments, the Cas protein used in methods described herein is Cas9 or a functional derivative thereof. In some embodiments, the Cas9 protein is from Streptococcus pyogenes. Cas9 contains 2 endonuclease domains, including an RuvC-like domain which cleaves target DNA that is noncomplementary to crRNA, and an HNH nuclease domain which cleaves target DNA complementary to crRNA. The double-stranded endonuclease activity of Cas9 also requires that a short conserved sequence (e.g., 2-5 nucleotides), known as a protospacer-associated motif (PAM), follows immediately after the 3′ end of a target motif in the target sequence.
In some embodiments, the Cas protein is introduced into TNBC cells in polypeptide form. In certain embodiments, the Cas protein may be conjugated to a cell-penetrating polypeptide. Non-limiting examples of cell-penetrating peptides include, but are not limited to, e.g., those provided in Milletti et al., Drug Discov. Today 17: 850-860, 2012, the relevant disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In other embodiments, a TNBC cell may be genetically engineered to produce the Cas protein.
In some embodiments, the target motif in the CDK19 gene, to which the Cas protein is directed by the guide RNAs, may be between 15 and 25 nucleotides in length (e.g., 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, or 25 nucleotides in length). In some embodiments, the target motif is at least 20 nucleotides in length. In some embodiments, the target motif in the CDK19 gene immediately precedes a short conserved sequence known as a protospacer-associated motif (PAM), recognized by the Cas protein. In some embodiments, the PAM motif is an NGG motif. In some embodiments, the target motif of the CDK19 gene is within the first exon. In some embodiments, the target motifs can be selected to minimize off-target effects of the CRISPR/Cas systems. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a variety of techniques can be used to select suitable target motifs for minimizing off-target effects (e.g., bioinformatics analyses).
The ribonucleic acids that are capable of directing the Cas protein to and hybridizing to a target motif in the CDK19 gene are referred to as single guide RNA (“sgRNA”). The sgRNAs can be selected depending on the particular CRISPR/Cas system employed, and the sequence of the target polynucleotide, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. In some embodiments, the one or two ribonucleic acids can also be selected to minimize hybridization with nucleic acid sequences other than the target polynucleotide sequence. In some embodiments, the one or two ribonucleic acids are designed to hybridize to a target motif immediately adjacent to a deoxyribonucleic acid motif recognized by the Cas protein. Guide RNAs can also be designed using available software, for example, CRISPR Design Tool (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). In some embodiments, the one or more sgRNAs can be transfected into TNBC cells, according to methods known in the art.
The use of antibodies for therapeutic purposes has been used to treat cancer. Passive immunotherapy involves the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in cancer treatments (see for example, Devita, Hellman, And Rosenberg’s Cancer: Principles & Practice Of Oncology, Eighth Edition (2008), DeVita, V. et al. Eds., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa., pp. 537-547, 2979-2990). These antibodies can have inherent therapeutic biological activity both by direct inhibition of tumor cell growth or survival and by their ability to recruit the natural cell killing activity of the body’s immune system. The antibodies can be administered alone or in conjunction with radiation or chemotherapeutic agents. Trastuzumab, approved for treatment of breast cancer is an example of such a therapeutic. Alternatively, antibodies can be used to make antibody-drug conjugates in which the antibody is linked to a drug and directs that agent to the tumor by specifically binding to the tumor. Ado-Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an example of an approved antibody-drug conjugate used for the treatment of breast cancer (see, Deng et al., Curr. Med. Chem., Vol. 24(23), 2505-2527 (2017). Another type of immunotherapy is active immunotherapy, or vaccination, with an antigen present on a specific cancer (e.g., TNBC cells) or a DNA construct that directs the expression of the antigen, which then evokes the immune response in the subject, i.e., to induce the subject to actively produce antibodies against their own cancer.
Antibodies have been highly effective in targeting cell surface proteins involved in disease. Though it is generally believed that their large size, complex architecture, and structural reliance on disulfide bonds preclude intracellular application, a number of examples of both in situ-expressed (see, e.g, Miersch and Sidhu, F1000Res doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8915.1, 2016) and exogenously supplied whole antibodies shown to maintain functional intracellular activity exist in the literature (see, e.g., Biocca et al., Expression and targeting of intracellular antibodies in mammalian cells. EMBO J. (1990); 9(1): 101-8 and Steinberger et al., Functional deletion of the CCR5 receptor by intracellular immunization produces cells that are refractory to CCRS-dependent HIV-1 infection and cell fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2000); 97(2): 805-10). Attempts to use smaller, less complex binding proteins such as antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) and single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) for intracellular application have similarly shown success in their ability to bind and modulate cytoplasmic protein function (See for example, Marasco et al., Design, intracellular expression, and activity of a human anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 single-chain antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1993); 90(16): 7889-93).
As used herein, the term “antibody” encompasses, but is not limited to, whole immunoglobulin (i.e., an intact antibody) of any class. Native antibodies are usually heterotetrameric glycoproteins, composed of two identical light (L) chains and two identical heavy (H) chains. Typically, each light chain is linked to a heavy chain by one covalent disulfide bond, while the number of disulfide linkages varies between the heavy chains of different immunoglobulin isotypes. Each heavy and light chain also has regularly spaced intrachain disulfide bridges. Each heavy chain has at one end a variable domain (V(H)) followed by a number of constant domains. Each light chain has a variable domain at one end (V(L)) and a constant domain at its other end; the constant domain of the light chain is aligned with the first constant domain of the heavy chain, and the light chain variable domain is aligned with the variable domain of the heavy chain. Particular amino acid residues are believed to form an interface between the light and heavy chain variable domains. The light chains of antibodies from any vertebrate species can be assigned to one of two clearly distinct types, called kappa (κ) and lambda (A), based on the amino acid sequences of their constant domains. Depending on the amino acid sequence of the constant domain of their heavy chains, immunoglobulins can be assigned to different classes. There are five major classes of immunoglobulins: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and IgM, and several of these may be further divided into subclasses (isotypes), e.g., IgG-1, IgG-2, IgG-3, and IgG-4; IgA-1 and IgA-2. The heavy chain constant domains that correspond to the different classes of immunoglobulins are called alpha, delta, epsilon, gamma, and mu, respectively.
As used herein, the term “epitope” is meant to include any determinant capable of specific interaction with the provided antibodies. Epitopic determinants usually consist of chemically active surface groupings of molecules such as amino acids or sugar side chains and usually have specific three dimensional structural characteristics, as well as specific charge characteristics. Identification of the epitope that the antibody recognizes is performed as follows. First, various partial structures of the target molecule that the monoclonal antibody recognizes are prepared. The partial structures are prepared by preparing partial peptides of the molecule. Such peptides are prepared by, for example, known oligopeptide synthesis technique or by incorporating DNA encoding the desired partial polypeptide in a suitable expression plasmid. The expression plasmid is delivered to a suitable host, such as E. coli, to produce the peptides. For example, a series of polypeptides having appropriately reduced lengths, working from the C- or N-terminus of the target molecule, can be prepared by established genetic engineering techniques. By establishing which fragments react with the antibody, the epitope region is identified. The epitope is more closely identified by synthesizing a variety of smaller peptides or mutants of the peptides using established oligopeptide synthesis techniques. The smaller peptides are used, for example, in a competitive inhibition assay to determine whether a specific peptide interferes with binding of the antibody to the target molecule. If so, the peptide is the epitope to which the antibody binds. Commercially available kits, such as the SPOTs Kit (Genosys Biotechnologies, Inc., The Woodlands, TX) and a series of multipin peptide synthesis kits based on the multipin synthesis method (Chiron Corporation, Emeryvile, CA) may be used to obtain a large variety of oligopeptides.
The term antibody or fragments thereof can also encompass chimeric antibodies and hybrid antibodies, with dual or multiple antigen or epitope specificities, and fragments, such as F(ab′)2, Fab′, Fab and the like, including hybrid fragments. Thus, fragments of the antibodies that retain the ability to bind their specific antigens are provided. For example, fragments of antibodies which maintain CDK19 binding activity are included within the meaning of the term antibody or fragment thereof. Such antibodies and fragments can be made by techniques known in the art and can be screened for specificity and activity according to general methods for producing antibodies and screening antibodies for specificity and activity (See Harlow and Lane. Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Publications, New York (1988)).
Also included within the meaning of antibody or fragments thereof are conjugates of antibody fragments and antigen binding proteins (single chain antibodies) as described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,704,692, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In one embodiment, a therapeutic antibody (or antibody fragment) can be prepared using methods known in the art, having specificity for an antigen present in breast cancer, and in particular TNBC cells, that is absent or present only at low levels in any normal (non-cancerous) tissue. The therapeutic antibody would therefore have biological activity against TNBC cells and be able to recruit the immune system’s response to treat the disease. The therapeutic antibody can be administered as a therapeutic alone or in combination with current treatments (such as chemotherapy, radiation, or platinum-based therapies) or used to prepare immunoconjugates linked to toxic agents, such as drugs.
Monoclonal antibodies to CDK19 (e.g., anti-CKD19 antibodies), made by methods known in the art, can be used to identify the presence or absence of cancerous cells in breast tissue, for purposes of diagnosis or treatment. Anti-CKD19 antibodies can also be used to identify the presence or absence of cancerous cells, or the level thereof, which are circulating in the blood after their release from a solid tumor. Such circulating antigen can include an intact CDK19 antigen, or a fragment thereof that retains the ability to be detected according to the methods taught herein. Such detection may be effected for example, by FACS analysis using standard methods commonly used in the art.
In some embodiments, methods of targeting CDK19 can include administering to a subject in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of an antibody (e.g., an anti-CKD19 antibody) that is immunoreactive to CDK19 for the treatment of breast cancer, in particular treatment of TNBC. In one embodiment, the antibody having immunoreactivity to CDK19 targets intracellular signaling molecules, such as kinases, as opposed to cell surface molecules, whereby the specificity of the antibody is provided by neutralizing epitope(s) present on CDK19 that are not present on CDK8. In another embodiment, the anti-CDK19 antibody can target the Pl3K/mTOR/AKT pathway or ERK5 (see, Ocana and Pandiella, Oncotarget, 8(13), 22218-22234 (2017)). In one embodiment, the anti-CDK19 antibody can target multiple intracellular signaling molecules, for example, the Pl3K/mTOR and JAK/STAT pathway. In yet another embodiment, the anti-CDK19 antibody can comprise an engineered protein that binds to a neutralizing epitope present on CDK19 that is not present on CDK8.
In one embodiment, methods of targeting CDK19 can include administering to a subject in need thereof, a therapeutically effective amount of a tumor antigen (TA)-specific monoclonal antibody for the treatment of TNBC. In one embodiment, the TA-specific mAB can be directed to an intracellular antigen associated with TNBC (See for example, Wang et al., Molecular Oncology, Vol. 9(10), (2015) 1982-1993 and Just, FEBS letters, 2:21 (2014), 350-355).
In one aspect, provided is a method of treating a subject with breast cancer, the method including the step of administering to the subject a pharmaceutically effective amount of a composition comprising a CDK19 targeting agent. The CDK19 targeting agent may be a CDK19 targeted antibody, a CDK19 targeted peptide, a CDK19 targeted small molecule, a CDK19 targeted RNA molecule, or a combination thereof. In some instances, the CDK19 targeted agent may be conjugated to a therapeutic agent. In some instances, the method further includes administering a second form of cancer therapy (e.g., chemotherapy or radiation therapy) to the subject. In one embodiment, the breast cancer is TNBC. In another aspect, provided is a method of inhibiting expression of the CDK19 gene in a breast cancer cell, the method including the steps of contacting a breast cancer cell expressing the CDK19 gene with a synthetic CDK19 targeted RNA molecule.
In another aspect, provided is a method of assessing responsiveness of a subject with cancer to a CDK19 targeted agent including the steps of: (a) measuring in a tumor sample from a subject the amount of CDK19; (b) determining if a subject has a cancer characterized as having a high level of CDK19 expression; and (c) indicating that the subject is more likely to respond to the CDK19 targeted agent if the subject’s cancer is characterized as having a high level of CDK19 expression or that the subject is less likely to respond to the CDK19 targeted agent if the subject’s cancer is characterized as having a low level of CDK19 expression.
In one aspect, provided is a method of treating a subject with cancer, the method comprising administering to the patient a pharmaceutically effective amount of a composition comprising a CDK19 targeted agent. The CDK19 targeted agent is an agent that specifically binds to CDK19 protein or to CDK19 mRNA. CDK19 targeted agents include antibodies, or fragments thereof, peptides, small molecules, and polynucleotides (such as RNA molecules) that specifically bind to CDK19 protein or to CDK19 mRNA. The composition may further comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In some instances, CDK19 targeted agents that bind to the CDK19 protein may directly inhibit CDK19 activity. In other instances, CDK19 targeted agents that bind to CDK19 mRNA may inhibit CDK19 expression and thereby inhibit CDK19 activity.
In one instance, the CDK19 targeted agent may comprise a CDK19 targeted antibody. The CDK19 targeted antibody may be a monoclonal antibody. In some instances, the CDK19 targeted antibody may be a humanized antibody. In another instance, the CDK19 targeted agent may be a CDK19 targeted peptide. In yet another instance, the CDK19 targeted agent may be a CDK19 targeted small molecule. The CDK19 targeted peptides and small molecules may be derived in a variety of manners as discussed further below. In some instances, the peptides are derived from the sequence of a CDK19 targeted antibody.
In some instances, treating a subject with the methods described herein inhibits at least one of: formation of a tumor, the proliferation of tumor cells, the growth of tumor cells, or metastasis of tumor cells in the subject. In another embodiment, treating a subject with the methods described herein may result in reduction of tumor size and, in some instances, elimination of one or more tumors in the subject.
3.1.4. Small Molecule InhibitorsIn one approach, methods for treating TNBC include targeting the CDK19 protein using a small molecule inhibitor of CDK19 activity. Examples of small molecule inhibitors of CDK19 are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,321,737, U.S. Pat. Publication No. US 20170071942, Mallinger et al., J. Med. Chem. 59:1078, 2016, and Czodrowski et al., J. Med. Chem. 59:9337, 2016. In some embodiments, the small molecule inhibitors bind to the ATP binding site of CDK19 to inhibit its activity.
The small molecule inhibitor of CDK19 may bind to the ATP binding site of CDK19 covalently or non-covalently to inhibit its activity. In other embodiments, the small molecule inhibitor may bind to other parts of CDK19 outside of the ATP binding site. For example, the small molecule inhibitor may form a covalent interaction with an amino acid (e.g., methionine, tyrosine, or serine) outside of the ATP binding site to inhibit CDK19 activity. In addition to occupying the ATP binding to inhibit kinase activity, a small molecule inhibitor may also bind to CDK19 to cause a conformational change in CDK19 that prevents CDK19 from functioning. In some embodiments, the small molecule inhibitor may bind to CDK19 with a higher affinity than to CDK8. As shown in
In some embodiments the small molecule inhibitor is other than a compound described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,321,737. In some embodiments the small molecule inhibitor is other than a compound described in U.S. Pat. Publication No. US 20170071942. In some embodiments the small molecule inhibitor is other than a compound described in, Mallinger et al., J. Med. Chem. 59:1078, 2016. In some embodiments the small molecule inhibitor is other than a compound described in Czodrowski et al., J. Med. Chem. 59:9337, 2016. In some embodiments the small molecule inhibitor is other than one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of Cortistatin A, Sorafenib, Linifanib, Ponatinib, Senexin B, CCT251545, and CCT251921
3.1.5. Cdk19 Inhibitors That Do Not Significantly Inhibit Expression or Activity of Cdk8 or Which Inhibits Expression or Activity of Cdk19 to a Greater Extent Than It Inhibits Expression or Activity of CDK8Agents that inhibitors expression or activity of CDK19 but do not inhibit expression or activity of CDK8, or agents that inhibit expression or activity of CDK19 to a greater extent than expression or activity of CDK8 is inhibited can be designed based on differences in sequence and structure of the CDK19 and CDK8 proteins and their corresponding genes and mRNAs. For example, an alignment of CDK19 and CDK8 mRNA sequences can identify non-identical or low identity nucleotide sequences that can be used to design shRNAs or other nucleic acid agents that associate with CDK19 mRNA but not CDK8 sequences. (see,
The term “an agent that inhibits CDK19 activity but does not significantly inhibit activity of CDK8” as used herein, refers to an agent that is capable of specifically binding and inhibiting the activity of CDK19 such that minimal CDK19 activity is detected in vivo or in vitro; while the agent causes no significant decrease in CDK8 activity under the same conditions. For example, an agent that inhibits activity of CDK19 can specifically bind to CDK19 and fully or significantly inhibit CDK19 activity in vivo or in vitro. In some cases, a CDK19 inhibitor can be identified by its ability to preferentially bind to the CDK19 gene or a CDK19 gene product, and fully inhibit expression or activity of CDK19. Inhibition of CDK19 occurs when CDK19 activity, when exposed to an agent, is at least about 70% less, for example, at least about 75%, 80%, 90%, or 95% less than CDK19 activity in the presence of a control or in the absence of the agent. No significant decrease in CDK8 activity occurs when CDK8 activity, upon exposure to the agent, is at least about 90%, for example, at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%, in comparison to CDK8 activity in the absence of the agent. As set forth herein, the agent can include small molecules (i.e., a molecule having a formula weight of 1000 Daltons or less), such as small molecule chemical inhibitors or large molecules, such as siRNA, shRNA, antisense oligonucleotides, or proteins.
Determining the effect of the agent on CDK19 and/or CDK8 activity can be measured using one or more methods known in the art, including but not limited to, half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), dissociation constant (KD), and inhibitor constant (Kl). For example, IC50 is a measure of the effectiveness of a substance in inhibiting a specific biological or biochemical function. This value indicates the concentration of the substance needed to inhibit a given biological process (or component of the biological process) by half. The IC50 values are typically expressed as molar concentration. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), IC50 represents the concentration of a drug required for 50% inhibition in vitro. In one embodiment, an agent that inhibits CDK19 activity but does not significantly inhibit activity of CDK8 has an IC50 that is at least about 2-fold, 5-fold, 10- fold, 50-fold, 75-fold, or 100-fold, lower than the concentration of the agent required to effect CDK8 activity under the same conditions. In another embodiment, the IC50 for the agent to inhibit CDK19 activity is at least about 25%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%, lower than the IC50 for the agent to inhibit the activity of CDK8.
In another embodiment, the effect of the agent on CDK19 and CDK8 activity can be determined by calculating the equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of the agent to each CDK. For example, an agent that inhibits the activity of CDK19 but does not significantly inhibit activity of CDK8 has a KD that is at least about 2-fold, 5-fold, 10- fold, 50-fold, or 100-fold lower than the KD of the agent to CDK8 under the same conditions. In one embodiment, the KD for the agent (to CDK19) is at least about 25%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%, lower than the Ko for the agent (to CDK8). In a preferred embodiment, the KD is lower for the agent to CDK19 as compared to the KD of the agent to CDK8. Said differently, the equilibrium dissociation constant of the agent (to CDK8) is greater than the equilibrium dissociation constant of the agent (to CDK19). In one embodiment, the agent can include an antibody having a KD value in the micromolar (10-6) to nanomolar (10-7 to 10-9) range. In another embodiment, the agent can include an antibody having a KD in the nanomolar range (10-9) to the picomolar (10-12) range. In yet another embodiment, the agent can have a nanomolar (nM) equilibrium dissociation constant to CDK19 and a micromolar (µM) equilibrium dissociation constant to CDK8. U.S. Pat. Publication No. US20120071477 describes kinase inhibition assays in which a compound at a single concentration (2,000 nM) to inhibit ATP pocket binding.
In another embodiment, the effect of the agent on CDK19 and CDK8 activity can be determined by calculating the inhibitor constant (Kl) of the agent to each CDK. The Kl is an indication of how potent an inhibitor is; it is the concentration required to produce half maximum inhibition. The lower the Ki, the greater the binding affinity between the agent and the CDK gene. For example, an agent that inhibits the activity of CDK19 but does not significantly inhibit activity of CDK8 has a Kl that is at least about 2-fold, 5-fold, 10- fold, 50-fold, 75-fold, or 100-fold lower than the Kl of the agent (to CDK8) under the same conditions. In one embodiment, the Kl for the agent to CDK19 is at least about 25%, 50%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%, lower than the Kl for the agent to CDK8. In a preferred embodiment, the Kl is lower for the agent to CDK19 as compared to the Kl of the agent to CDK8. Said differently, the inhibitor constant of the agent to CDK8 is greater than the inhibitor constant of the agent to CDK19. For example, an agent that inhibits activity of CDK19 can bind to CDK19 and significantly inhibit CDK19 activity in vivo or in vitro. In some cases, a CDK19 inhibitor can be identified by its ability to preferentially bind to CDK19 and fully inhibit activity of CDK19. Inhibition of CDK19 occurs when CDK19 activity, when exposed to an agent of the invention, is at least about 70% less, for example, at least about 75%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% less, or totally inhibited, in comparison to CDK19 activity in the presence of a control or in the absence of the agent. No significant decrease in CDK8 activity occurs when, CDK8 activity upon exposure to the agent, is at least about 90%, for example, at least 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%, in comparison to CDK8 activity in the absence of the agent.
The term “an agent that inhibits activity of CDK19 to a greater extent than it inhibits activity of CDK8” as used herein, refers to an agent that is capable of binding and inhibiting the activity of CDK19 significantly more than the agent’s effect on inhibiting the activity of CDK8 under the same conditions. For example, an agent that inhibits activity of CDK19 to a greater extent than inhibiting the activity of CDK8, occurs when CDK19 activity, when exposed to an agent of the invention, is at least about 10% less, for example, at least about 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, or 50% less, than the activity of CDK8 under the same conditions in vitro or in vivo. In a preferred embodiment, an agent inhibits the activity of CDK19 to a greater extent than the activity of CDK8, when the activity of CDK19 observed is at least 10% less than the activity of CDK8 under the same conditions. In another embodiment, an agent inhibits the activity of CDK19 to a greater extent than CDK8 activity, when at least 2-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 20-fold, 50-fold, or 100-fold less CDK19 activity is observed as compared to CDK8 activity under the same conditions. The extent of inhibition (i.e., comparing CDK19 activity to CDK8 activity) can be determined using one or more methods known in the art, including but not limited to assays described herein in the Examples section of the specification and for example, “Percent Of Control (POC)” or “Normalized Percent Inhibition (NPI)”. POC and NPI are methods that normalize data and are often used when comparing multiple agents (e.g., various antibodies or small molecules) against multiple targets (e.g., CDK19 and CDK8). For example, POC is a method that corrects for plate-to-plate variability (for example in high-throughput drug screening) by normalizing an agent’s measurement relative to one or more controls present in the plate. Raw measurements for each agent can be divided by the “average” of within-plate controls. NPI is a control-based method in which the difference between the agent measurement and the mean of the positive controls is divided by the difference between the means of the measurements on the positive and the negative controls (Malo et al., Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 24, 167-175 (2006)). By normalizing the extent of inhibition observed, accurate conclusions can be made regarding which agent(s) are effective at inhibiting the activity of each target under investigation.
3.1.6. Combination TherapyIn one approach the patient is treated with a combination therapy comprising an agent that inhibits expression or activity of CDK19 and (a) radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. In one approach radiation or chemotherapy eliminates the bulk of the tumor mass and the CDK19 inhibitor reduces the number of viable cancer stem cells (e.g., EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low) cells. In one approach the chemotherapy comprises administration of an anthracycline (e.g., Doxorubicin or Epirubicin), a taxane (e.g., Paclitaxel or Docetaxel), an anti-metabolite (e.g., Capecitabine or Gemcitabine), a platinum agent (e.g., Carboplatin or Cisplatin), Vinorelbine, or Eribulin.
3.2 Methods of Assessing or Predicting Therapeutic EffectA course of therapy with the CDK19 inhibitor will have a beneficial outcome for the patient, including, for example, a reduction in tumor volume, a reduction in metastases, and a reduction in tumor cells having the phenotype EpCAMmed/high and CD10-/low.
Tumor volume may be measured using art-known methods. See, e.g., Wapnir et al., Breast Cancer Res Treat 41:15-19, 1996; Sapi et al., PLoS One 10:e0142190, 2015. Tumor volume may be reduced by at least 10%, optionally at least 20% and sometimes by at least 50% after a course of treatment with a CDK19 inhibiting agent as monotherapy or in combination with other agent(s) or treatments. In some embodiments, the reduction in tumor volume (e.g., at least 10%, 20%, or 30% reduction in tumor volume) may be observed as soon as within 1 month of initiating therapy. In other embodiments, the reduction in tumor volume (e.g., at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, or 60% reduction in tumor volume) may be observed within 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 months of initiating therapy. In other embodiments, the methods described herein to treat TNBC may also slow down or inhibit the further growth of a tumor. In some embodiments a patient receives combination therapy and a therapeutic benefit is observed that exceeds that of monotherapy with the second agent.
A reduction in metastases in an individual may be determined as described in Makela et al., Sci Rep. 7:42109, 2017 and may be observed in a population according to standard methodology.
In some embodiments, the presence or amount of cancer cells having the expression profile EpCAMmed/high and CD10-/low in a TNBC tumor tissue obtained from a subject may be used to predict or assess the therapeutic responsiveness of the subject to treatments that target the CDK19 gene or its corresponding protein. As described and demonstrated herein, cells having the expression profile EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low have a high tumor initiating capacity and are also enriched in CDK19. In some embodiments, subjects having a high percentage of EpCAMmed/high and CD10-/low TNBC cells may be especially responsive.
In one approach the likely therapeutic responsiveness of a subject with TNBC to a CDK19 targeting agent is determined by (a) quantitating EpCAM med/high /CD10-/low cells in a tumor sample obtained from the subject; (b) comparing the quantity of EpCAMmed/high/CD10- /low cells in (a) to a reference value characteristic of tumors responsive to a CDK19 targeting therapy, and treating the patient with an inhibitor of CDK19 expression or activity if the quantity of EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells is equal to or exceeds the reference value. The reference value can be determined by quantitating EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells in healthy and TNBC populations and calculating statistically significant ranges characteristic of healthy and tumor tissues. In another approach tumor tissue and healthy tissue from the same subject can be tested, and subjects with elevated EpCAMmed/high/CD10-low cells in tumor relative to healthy tissues can be identified as likely to respond to CDK19 targeted therapy.
3.3 Delivery of AgentsThe pharmaceutical compositions used in methods described herein may include an active ingredient and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients, which can be formulated by methods known to those skilled in the art. In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention includes, in a therapeutically effective amount, a DNA or RNA oligonucleotide that decreases the expression level of the CDK19 gene. In other embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention includes, a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention includes a DNA or RNA oligonucleotide in a therapeutically effective amount, a small molecule that inhibits the activity of CDK19. The therapeutically effective amount of the active ingredient in a pharmaceutical composition is sufficient to prevent, alleviate, or ameliorate symptoms of a disease or to prolong the survival of the subject being treated. Determination of a therapeutically effective amount is within the capability of those skilled in the art.
In certain embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention is formulated as a depot preparation. In general, depot preparations are typically longer acting than non-depot preparations. In some embodiments, such preparations are administered by implantation (for example subcutaneously) or by intramuscular injection. In some embodiments, depot preparations are prepared using suitable polymeric or hydrophobic materials (for example an emulsion in an acceptable oil) or ion exchange resins, or as sparingly soluble derivatives, for example, as a sparingly soluble salt.
In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition may include a delivery system. Examples of delivery systems include, but are not limited to, exosomes, liposomes, and emulsions. In some embodiments, an active ingredient may be loaded or packaged in exosomes that specifically target a cell type, tissue, or organ to be treated. Exosomes are small membrane-bound vesicles of endocytic origin that are released into the extracellular environment following fusion of mutivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane. Exosome production has been described for many immune cells including B cells, T cells, and dendritic cells. Techniques used to load a therapeutic compound into exosomes are known in the art and described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. Publication Nos. US 20130053426 and US 20140348904, and International Patent Publication No. WO 2015002956, which are incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, therapeutic compounds may be loaded into exosomes by electroporation or the use of a transfection reagent (i.e., cationic liposomes). In some embodiments, an exosome-producing cell can be engineered to produce the exosome and load it with the therapeutic compound. For example, exosomes may be loaded by transforming or transfecting an exosome-producing host cell with a genetic construct that expresses the active ingredient (i.e., a DNA or RNA oligonucleotide), such that the active ingredient is taken up into the exosomes as the exosomes are produced by the host cell. Various targeting moieties may be introduced into exosomes, so that the exosomes can be targeted to a selected cell type, tissue, or organ. Targeting moieties may bind to cell-surface receptors or other cell-surface proteins or peptides that are specific to the targeted cell type, tissue, or organ. In some embodiments, exosomes have a targeting moiety expressed on their surface. In some embodiments, the targeting moiety expressed on the surface of exosomes is fused to an exosomal transmembrane protein. Techniques of introducing targeting moieties to exosomes are known in the art and described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. Publication Nos. US 20130053426 and US 20140348904, and International Patent Publication No. WO 2015002956, which are incorporated herein by reference.
4. Examples 4.1 Example 1- Materials and Experimental Methods Chemical ReagentsThe following are the chemical names for the compounds used in this study. CCT152921 is4-[(2-Phenylethyl)amino]-6-quinazolinecarbonitrile (NIH NCAT). The compound was re-suspended in vehicle (PBS + 0.5% Methocel (w/v) + 0.25% Tween 20 (v/v)) to a concentration of 3 mg/mL and mice were dosed at 30 mg/kg. CCT251921 or vehicle was administered via daily oral gavage.
shRNA Expression Lentiviral PlasmidsPairs of complementary ssDNA oligonucleotides containing the sense target sequence, a 15-mer loop sequence (5′-GTTAATATTCATAGC-3′ SEQ ID NO: 19), and the reverse complement of the sense sequence were synthesized (Elim Biopharmaceuticals). The oligonucleotides were annealed in 50 µM annealing buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). The double-stranded DNA oligo templates were subsequently cloned into the pRSI12-U6-(sh)-HTS4-UbiC-TagRFP-2A-Puro shRNA expression vector (Cellecta) digested with Bbsl for constitutively active shRNA vector constructs and pRSITUR-U6Tet-(sh)-UbiC-TetRep-2A-TagRFP digested with Bbsl for inducible shRNA vector constructs. The sense strands in the shRNA vectors used in this study were: 5′-GCG AGA ATT GAA GTA CCT TAA-3′ (shCDK19-1 (SEQ ID NO: 1)), 5′-ACC AGC AAA TAT CCT AGT AAT-3′ (shCDK19-2 (SEQ ID NO:2)), and 5′-GCA GGG TAATAA CCA CATTAA-3′ (shCDK8-2 (SEQ ID NO: 3)). The unmodified pRSI12-U6-(sh)-HTS4-UbiC-TagRFP-2A-Puro shRNA expression vector above was used as the ‘empty’ control shRNA. The pHIV-ZsGreen expression vector (Addgene) was used to produce GFP positive tumor cells. The DECIPHER 27 K Pooled shRNA lentivirus library - Human Module 1 (Cellecta) used for the RNAi screen contains 27,500 unique shRNA constructs targeting 5,043 human genes (approximately five or six redundant shRNAs per gene) in the same pRSI12 shRNA expression vector.
Cell LinesMDA-MB231, MDA-MB468, HS578T, and 293T cells were obtained from ATCC. HMEC cells were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific. These cells were certified by the vendors to be mycoplasma free. None of the cell lines used are listed in the database of commonly misidentified cell lines maintained by ICLAC. All cell lines used were passaged less than 10 times from when the original cells from the vendors were thawed. All MDA-MB231, MDA-MB468, 293T, and HS578T cells were grown in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with PSA (Life Technologies), 10% FBS (Hyclone), Glutamax (ThermoFisher Scientific), and sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies). HMEC cells were grown in HuMEC Ready Medium (ThermoFisher Scientific).
MiceNod scid gamma (NSG) mice (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid IL2Rgtm1Wjl/SzJ) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Mice used for PDX experiments were adult female mice between 8 and 10 weeks old. All the mice used in this study were maintained at the Stanford Animal Facility in accordance with a protocol approved by the Stanford University APLAC committee. Mice were maintained in-house under aseptic sterile conditions. Mice were administered autoclaved food and water. For PDX experiments utilizing doxycycline inducible constructs, mice were provided rodent feed containing 625 mg Doxycycline hyclate/kg diet (Envigo) in place of their normal rodent diet.
PDX Tumors and Their Pathological and Clinical CharacteristicsFor human samples, informed consent was obtained after the approval of protocols by the Institutional Review Boards of Stanford University and The City of Hope. See
Xenografts were mechanically chopped with a razor blade to approximately 1 mm pieces and then incubated at 37°-C for 3 to 4 hours with collagenase and hyaluronidase (Stem Cell Technologies) in Advanced DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen) with 120 µg/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin-B (PSA) (Life Technologies). Cells were then treated with ACK lysis buffer (Gibco) to lyse red blood cells, followed by 5 mins of treatment with pre-warmed dispase (Stem Cell Technologies) plus DNAsel (Sigma) and filtered through a 40 µm nylon mesh filter. Cells were finally washed with flow cytometry buffer (HBBS, 2% FCS, PSA).
Enrichment of PDX Tumor CellsAfter PDX tumors were dissociated into single cells, the number of live cells were determined with Trypan blue staining and manually counted with a hemocytometer. Cells were resuspended with flow cytometry buffer to a concentration of 106 live cells/mL and incubated 1:50 (v/v) with Biotin anti-human CD326 (EpCAM) antibody (Biolegend) for 20 mins at 4°-C. Cells were washed with flow cytometry buffer and then resuspended to 80 µL and incubated with 20 µL anti-biotin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for 20 mins at 4°-C. Cells were then washed with flow cytometry buffer and resuspended in 500 µL of buffer. Cells were applied to magnetized LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec), washed, and eluted off magnet per manufacturer’s protocol.
Lentivirus ProductionLentivirus was produced with Packaging Plasmid Mix (Cellecta) and subcloned pRSl12 shRNA expression plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermofisher Scientific) in 293T cells per manufacturer’s instructions. Supernatants were collected at 48 h and 72 h, filtered with a 0.45 µm filter and precipitated with Lentivirus Precipitation Solution (Alstem LLC) per manufacturer’s instructions. Virus was resuspended in 1/100 original volume. Viral titers were determined by flow cytometry analyses of 293T cells infected with serial dilutions of concentrated virus.
Lentivirus InfectionFor in vitro cell line experiments, concentrated lentiviral supernatant (to achieve an MOI of 3) was mixed with cells at the time of seeding. Cells were monitored by visualization of RFP under fluorescence microscopy. All flow cytometry analyses were performed after at least 72 hours of infection.
For in vivo PDX tumor growth and organoid colony formation experiments, concentrated lentiviral supernatant (to achieve an MOI of 10) was mixed with single cell suspensions of PDX tumor cells in organoid media with 4 µg/mL of Polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich). Organoid media consisted of: Advanced DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen), 10% FBS (Hyclone), 2.5% growth factor-reduced Matrigel (BD), 10 ng/mL mouse EGF (R&D), 100 ng/mL Noggin (R&D), 250 ng/mL RSPO-I (R&D), 1X B27 (Invitrogen), 1X N2 (Invitrogen), and PSA (Life Technologies). Cells were then spinoculated by centrifuging at 15 ºC for 2 hours at 1200xg. Cells were resuspended by pipetting and left overnight in 48-well ultra-low attachment cell culture plates (Corning).
For organoid colony formation assays, cells were transferred the next day to matrigel. For in vivo PDX assays, approximately 75% of the cells were injected into NSG mice as described in the PDX tumor engraftment section. The remainder 25% of cells were plated on matrigel and grown in organoid media for 72 hours until the cells became RFP positive. At that point media was removed and exchanged for dispase and incubated for 2-3 h until the matrigel dissolved. Dissociated cells were resuspended in flow cytometry buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the ‘baseline’ RFP percentage for cells that were injected into the mice.
Organoid Colony Formation AssayIrradiated L1-Wnt3a feeder cells (generous gift of Dr. Roel Nusse) were mixed with growth factor reduced matrigel (BD Biosciences) and allowed to solidify at 37 ºC. Single cell suspensions of PDX tumor cells were transferred onto the solidified matrigel/feeder cell mix substrate and grown in organoid media. Cells were grown for approximately 2 weeks in a 37 ºC incubator with 5% CO2. 50% of media was exchanged with fresh media every 3-4 days. Colonies were counted under fluorescence microscopy. Only RFP positive colonies (which represent transduced cells) were counted. For experiments in which we induced expression of CDK19 shRNA, doxycycline hyclate was added to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL into the media.
Cell Viability AssayFor cell lines treated with chemical or infected with lentivirus, WST-1 Cell Proliferation Reagent (Roche) was added at 1:10 (v/v) final dilution to each well per manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were subsequently incubated at 37 ºC and 5% CO2. Between 1 and 4 hours after addition of reagent, plates were analyzed on a SpectraMax M3 Bioanalyzer (Molecular Devices). Absorbance for each well was measured at 450 nm (signal wavelength) and 650 nm (reference wavelength). Thus, the signal for each experimental sample was Absorbanceexperimental (A450nm-A650nm). To correct for the effect of media, Absorbancebackground (A450nm-A650nm) was obtained by measuring absorbance in a blank well. Thus, the background corrected signal for each sample Acorrected = Absorbanceexperimental -Absorbancebackground. All Acorrected values for the knockdowns were normalized to the Acorrected value for the control sample to obtain a ‘Relative Viability’.
Quantitative PCR RNA Expression AnalysesCells were lysed with Trizol (Life Technologies) and RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instruction. RNA was then treated with DNAsel to remove contaminating genomic DNA. RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and the following TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems) were used following manufacturer’s instructions: ACTB, Hs00357333_g1; CDK19, Hs01039931_m1; CDK8, Hs00993274_m1. Data was collected on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) and data analyzed with SDS 2.4 software (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression data in each sample was normalized against the expression of beta-actin.
PDX Tumor Cell Engraftment and Limiting Dilution AssaysSingle cell suspensions of PDX cells were resuspended in 50% (v/v) mixtures of normal matrigel (BD Biosciences) and flow cytometry buffer in a total volume of 50-100 µL. Using an insulin syringe, cells were injected subcutaneously into the nipple of female NSG mice at the fourth abdominal fat pad. For limiting dilution assays, the specific number of cells injected into the mice were determined by flow cytometry and secondarily by manual counting with a hemocytometer.
PDX Tumor Growth and Total Body WeightsPDX tumors were detected by palpation. Tumor volumes were determined by measuring the length (l) and width (w) and calculating volumes using the ellipsoid formula ⅙ x l x w2 x π. Tumors volumes and mice weights were determined twice per week.
Mouse PDX Tumor and Lung DissectionXenograft tumors and mice lungs were surgically resected after the mice were euthanized. A 3 to 4 mm section is cut from each tumor and saved in ice cold PBS for imaging. The mice lungs and tumors were imaged on a M205FA Fluorescence Stereo Microscope (Leica) and images were captured with a DFC310FX camera (Leica).
Flow Cytometry to Determine RFP PercentageFlow cytometry was performed with a 100 µm nozzle on a Flow Cytometry Aria II (BD Biosciences) with Diva software (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed using Flowjo software (Flowjo). For all experiments, side scatter and forward scatter profiles (area and width) were used to eliminate debris and cell doublets. Dead cells were eliminated by excluding 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-positive cells (Molecular Probes). For PDX tumor cells, they were gated for GFP positivity and then for RFP positivity. RFP percentage is the percentage of GFP positive cells that are also RFP positive. For each sample, we obtain the RFP fraction that is: the RFP % in the tumor divided by the baseline RFP % (see ‘Lentivirus infection’ section). RFP fraction for each sample is then normalized to the RFP fraction for the shRNA control sample which is set at 100% to obtain the ‘Normalized % RFP’.
Flow Cytometry Using EpCAM, CD10, and CD49f Cell Surface Markers for Analysis and Cell SortingFlow cytometry for analysis and cell sorting was performed as previously described. Human antibodies used included: EpCAM-Alexa Fluor 488 (clone 9C4, Biolegend); 1 µg mL-1, CD49f-APC (clone GoH3, Biolegend); CD10 PeCy7/Apc-Cy7 (clone H110a, Biolegend); 1 µg mL-1 and H-2Kd biotin/Pacific Blue (clone SF1-1.1, Biolegend); 1 µg mL-1.
RNAi Dropout Viability ScreenGFP positive PDX-T1 tumors grown in NSG mice were dissected, processed to single cells, and enriched with EpCAM as described previously. Analysis of cells at this point showed that they were approximately 98%-100% GFP positive.
For the in vitro RNAi dropout viability screen, 60 million dissociated PDX-T1 cells were transduced with the DECIPHER 27 K Pooled shRNA lentivirus library-Human Module 1 (Cellecta) at an MOI of 1 in the presence of polybrene and then spinoculated for 2 hours as described previously. The next day, half the cells were spun down and frozen as the in vitro baseline reference sample. A small number of cells were plated separately in organoid colony formation conditions to determine lentiviral infection percentage after 72 hours (cells were found to be approximately 80% RFP positive). The remainder of the cells were plated into twelve 150 mm dishes prepared with 12 mL matrigel containing irradiated L1-Wnt3a feeder cells at 250,000 cells/mL of matrigel. The cells were grown for 19 days with an exchange for fresh media every 3-4 days. On the final day, all the media was exchanged with dispase in order to dissolve the matrigel and to recover the cells. The cells from all the plates were pooled, washed, and frozen as the in vitro organoid growth experimental sample.
For the in vivo RNAi dropout viability screen, 30 million dissociated PDX-T1 cells were transduced with the DECIPHER 27 K Pooled shRNA lentivirus library-Human Module 1 (Cellecta) at an MOI of 1.25 in the presence of polybrene and then spinoculated for 2 hours as described previously. The next day, half the cells were spun down and frozen as the in vivo baseline reference sample. A small number of cells were plated separately in organoid colony formation conditions to determine lentiviral infection percentage after 72 hours (cells were found to be approximately 70% RFP positive). The remainder of the cells were resuspended in 50% (v/v) mixtures of normal matrigel (BD Biosciences) and flow cytometry buffer in a total volume of 1.8 mL. These cells were injected evenly into the right and left mammary fat pads of seventeen NSG mice. When tumors reached approximately 10 mm in diameter, the mice were euthanized and the tumors dissected as previously described. These tumors were then processed into single cells, pooled, washed, and frozen as the in vivo growth experimental sample.
The two pairs of samples, in vitro baseline reference sample and in vitro organoid growth experimental sample and in vivo baseline reference sample and in vivo growth experimental sample, were submitted to Cellecta, Inc. for genomic DNA extraction, bar code amplification, high-throughput sequencing and de-convolution. Twenty million barcode reads were performed for each sample.
‘Hit’ Selection Algorithm From the In Vivo and In Vitro RNAi Dropout Viability ScreensPlease see the schematic in
Sections of the PDX tumors were fixed in formalin overnight and then transferred to 70% ethanol. Samples were then embedded in paraffin and sectioned for histology. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded sections were de-parafinized in xylene and rehydrated in an ethanol gradient. Antigen retrieval was performed in a Tris-EDTA buffer by heating in a microwave for 20 min. The primary antibodies, polyclonal Rabbit anti-CDK19 (Sigma) and polyclonal chicken anti-CDK8 (Novus Biologicals), were diluted 1:50 and 1:100, respectively, in TBS + 1% BSA before applying to samples overnight. After overnight incubation, the secondary antibodies, Cy3 Donkey anti-Rabbit (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and Alexa 488 Goat anti-Chicken (Life Technologies) were diluted 1:500 in TBS + 1% BSA and incubated with the samples at room temperature. After DAPI staining, sections were mounted with Prolong® Gold antifade (Cell Signaling). A Zeiss LSM710 Confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) was used to take the immunofluorescence images. Images for publication were processed with Fiji software.
Microarray ExperimentEpCAM enriched PDX-T1 cells were infected with shCDK19-2, shCDK8-2 or control shRNA and grown in organoid culture conditions for 72 hours. They were subsequently recovered from matrigel with dispase, resuspended in flow cytometry buffer and sorted by flow cytometry to obtain cells that were both GFP and RFP positive. RNA was extracted from these cells by RNeasy plus micro kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions and quantified on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. 50 ng of total RNA from each sample was used. In vitro transcription, fragmentation, labeling, hybridization to the microarray and scanning was performed by the Stanford Protein and Nucleic acid facility (PAN facility). Samples were hybridized on PrimeView Human Gene Expression Arrays (Affymetrix). Gene Level Differential Expression Analysis was performed with the Transcriptome Analysis Console (Affymetrix). Downregulated genes were defined as those for which log2 (sample/control) < -1.5 and upregulated genes log2 (sample/control) > 1.5.
H3K27Ac Chromatin ImmunoprecipitationsChIP assays were performed as described in, e.g., Zarnegar et al., Nucleic Acids Research, gkx648, July, 2017. Approximately 250,000 to 500,000 MDA-MB231 cells were used per ChIP. 1 µg of anti-H3K27ac (Active Motif #39133) were used per ChIP.
Library ConstructionChIP enriched DNA was quantified using a Qubit 3.0 and dsDNA HS assay. Up to 1 ng of DNA was used for library construction using transposition based NEXTERA XT (followed manufacturer’s protocol with ~14 PCR cycles for indexing). Indexed samples were pooled and submitted for sequencing on a NextSeq500 to obtain 75 bp single end reads with read depths of ~60 million reads.
Sequence AnalysisRaw sequence reads were uploaded to Galaxy (usegalaxy.org) and aligned to the human genome (hg19) using Bowtie2 (-very-fast-local). Only uniquely mapped reads were retained for further analysis. To visualize data, alignment files were used to produce signal tracks with DeepTools (100 bp bins with 200 bp read extensions and RPKM normalization) and BigWig files were loaded into Broad’s Integrated Genome Browser. MACS2 was used to call peaks (-nomodel, p=0.01, -broad, cuttoff 0.1, duplicates = auto, extension 200) for each replicate. A consensus peak list containing only those peaks occurring in all replicates, was generated using Bedtools. We performed differential peak analysis across consensus peaks using DiffBind. The DiffBind output peak list was annotated by fetching the nearest nonoverlapping feature of the human RefSeq table from UCSC. Data for aggregation plots of ChIP signal across various peaks sets were generated using DeepTools′ computeMatrix (scale-regions: 1000; 50 bp bins) and plotProfile. Data was then plotted with GraphPad Prism software.
GSEA AnalysisGene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using the javaGSEA desktop application (GSEA 3.0) with log2 fold change values for CDK19 knockdown versus Control as the ranking metric and Hallmarks, CDK19KD-EnhancerUp and CDK19KD-EnhancerDOWN as the gene sets that were tested for enrichment.
Metascape AnalysisMetascape custom enrichment analysis of Hallmark gene sets using the CDK19KD-EnhancerUP ‘core’ genes and the CDK19KD-EnhancerDOWN ‘core’ genes (using the following parameters: H. Sapiens as the input species, p-value cutoffs of 0.01 and minimum enrichment 1.5) was performed online (www.metascape.org).
Statistical AnalysisResults are shown as mean ± s.d. Statistical calculations were performed with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc). Variance was analyzed using the F-test. To determine P-values, t-test was performed on homoscedastic populations, and t-test with Welch correction was applied on samples with different variances. For animal studies, sample size was not predetermined to ensure adequate power to detect a pre-specified effect size, no animals were excluded from analyses, experiments were not randomized and investigators were not blinded to group allocation during experiments.
4.2 Example 2 - Identification of Genes Essential for TNBC GrowthTo identify genes essential for the growth of TNBC, two pooled RNAi dropout viability screens were performed using a 27,500 shRNA library targeting 5000 genes in PDX-T1, a TNBC PDX (
CDK19 was chosen because data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) showed that CDK19 copy number amplifications and mRNA upregulation were more prevalent in TNBC patient samples (23%) compared to samples from other breast cancer subtypes (see, e.g., Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet 45:1113-1120, 2013;
To validate the growth inhibitory effect of CDK19 knockdown, three commonly used TNBC cell lines: MDA-MB231, MDA-MB468, and HS578T were used. Using two different shRNAs (shCDK19-1 (SEQ ID NO: 1) and shCDK19-2 (SEQ ID NO: 2)) that independently target CDK19, the knockdown of CDK19 (
In the same TNBC PDX used in the initial dropout screen (PDX-T1), CDK19 knockdown (
We extended our studies to more physiologically relevant in vivo systems by knocking down CDK19 in three different TNBC PDXs grown in NSG mice. These PDXs: PDX-T1, PDX-T2, and PDX-T3 were derived from chemotherapy naive patients (
These results confirmed that CDK19 is critical for tumor growth in vivo. CDK19 knockdown prevented transduced (RFP positive) TNBC cells from metastasizing to the lungs in mice. Percentage of mice with RFP positive lung metastases from mice bearing PDX-T1 (
Given that CDK19 knockdown inhibited growth in two independent assays commonly used to assess tumorigenicity (PDX growth in vivo and organoid colony formation in vitro) and genes critical for tumor initiation are frequently amplified or overexpressed in a subset of cancers, it is hypothesized that the tumor initiating cells (TICs) might be sensitive to CDK19 inhibition. Thus, we sought to identify the TICs within the TNBC PDXs. Previously, EpCAM and CD49f were utilized to isolate cell sub-populations in normal breast tissue and in breast cancers. However, in many TNBC PDXs, EpCAM and CD49f often cannot clearly separate cells into distinct sub-populations (
To test the tumor initiating capacity of the three EpCAM/CD10 separated sub-populations, we performed organoid colony formation assays in vitro and transplantation limiting dilution assays (LDA) in vivo. In organoid colony forming assays, the EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells formed significantly more organoid colonies than the EpCAMlow/medCD10low/+ cells (
Having identified these distinct subpopulations, we next investigated whether CDK19 expression was enriched in the more tumorigenic EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells compared to the less tumorigenic EPCAMlow/med/CD10low/+ cells. In three of the four PDXs examined, CDK19 expression was higher in the more tumorigenic EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells compared to the less tumorigenic EPCAMlow/med/CD10low/+ cells (
To determine tumor initiating frequencies in the setting of CDK19 knockdown, we performed LDA using PDX-T1 cells transduced with a doxycycline-inducible CDK19 knockdown construct to produce inducCDK19KD-PDX-T1 cells where we can control CDK19 expression (
There is an 84% amino acid sequence homology between CDK19 and its well described paralog, CDK8 (
To understand whether the molecular targets of CDK19 in TNBC are unique from CDK8, we knocked down each gene in MDA-MB231 and examined the respective gene expression changes relative to control. Overall, CDK19 knockdown affected 3909 genes and CDK8 knockdown affected 4233 genes (
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of the CDK19 and CDK8 knockdown genes allowed us to identify enriched Hallmark gene sets amongst the most upregulated or downregulated genes (
In summary, these analyses showed that CDK19 and CDK8 have the potential to co-regulate certain pathways, while counter-regulating others. Furthermore, CDK19, like CDK8, is capable of positively or negatively regulating biological pathways. The multitude of clinically relevant TNBC pathways regulated by CDK19 suggests that targeting CDK19 can provide the opportunity to modulate multiple pathways simultaneously and at the same time, avoid potential toxicity because of the advantageous limited tissue distribution of CDK19. This approach could overcome the resistance to single agent therapy commonly seen in TNBC and also potentially enable the targeting of ‘undruggable’ processes such as those involving P53 or MYC.
4.6 Example 6 - Effects of CDK19 and CDK8 on Epigenetic ModificationsRecent studies have highlighted the role of CDK19 and CDK8, as well as other transcriptional CDKs (CDK7, CDK12/CDK13), in regulating the transcription of critical oncogenic genes by acting at large clusters of enhancers (also called ‘super-enhancers’) that are marked by histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27Ac). The exact mechanism for this gene regulation is unclear, but is believed to occur in part through interactions of the CKM with Mediator to regulate RNAPII-Mediator interactions and in part by phosphorylating serine residues in the C-terminal domain of RNAPII. Given the propensity of transcriptional CDKs to function at enhancers, we wanted to investigate whether CDK19 and CDK8 can also regulate the epigenetic modifications at enhancer sites as a mechanism to control gene expression. While enhancer modification through other signaling pathways have been identified, this mechanism of gene control has not yet been reported for the CDKs.
To explore the role of CDK19 in epigenetic regulation, chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing (CHIP-Seq) for the H3K27Ac modification was performed on MDA-MB231 cells under three different conditions: Control (empty vector transduction), CDK19 knockdown, and CDK8 knockdown. Genome-wide analysis of all H3K27Ac modified regions showed that both CDK19 knockdown and CDK8 knockdown had similar global H3K27Ac levels compared to control (
We next assessed whether increases or decreases in H3K27Ac levels as a result of CDK19 knockdown corresponded to changes in gene output. For this, the previously defined All-H3K27UP and All-H3K27DOWN peak regions were annotated by proximity to the nearest gene to establish two gene sets: CDK19KD-EnhancerUP (1593 genes) and CDK19KD-EnhancerDOWN (341 genes) for further analysis (Table 1 and Table 2). GSEA of these gene sets with our CDK19 knockdown gene expression data indicated that genes most upregulated by CDK19 knockdown were enriched for the CDK19KD-EnhancerUP genes (NES 1.68, FDR q-value = 0.000) (
The aforementioned GSEA also enabled us to identify the leading edge ‘core’ genes that contribute the most to each enrichment (
We explored the effect of CDK19 knockdown on the growth of pre-established organoids in vitro and in pre-established PDX tumors in vivo. This aimed to model the treatment of patients’ pre-existing tumors. In vitro, adding doxycycline to the treatment group (to induce CDK19 shRNA) significantly reduced the number of pre-established organoids compared to the control (no doxycycline) (
To model the use of a CDK19 targeted therapy clinically, we treated mice with pre-established PDX tumors with CCT251921 (
From our data, we conclude that CDK19 regulates multiple cancer relevant pathways and that it is a potential therapeutic target in TICs. Thus, CDK19 inhibition is useful both to therapeutic strategies targeting transcriptional co-factors such as CDK8, CDK9, and BRD4, and to those targeting TICs and their self-renewal pathways such as Hedgehog, Wnt/β-catenin, and Notch. However, some therapeutic approaches may be limited by toxicity caused to normal cells. This can be attributed to the ubiquitous expression of transcriptional co-factors in normal tissues and the importance of self-renewal pathways in normal stem cells. BRD4 inhibition, for example, resulted in a disruption of tissue homeostasis in multiple organs in mice. Similarly, due to the challenge of narrow therapeutic indices, Hedgehog, Notch, and Wnt pathway inhibitors have had limited clinical success thus far. The biology of CDK19 points towards potential advantages as a therapeutic target. Compared to other ubiquitous transcriptional co-factors such as its paralog CDK8, CDK9, and BRD4, CDK19 has more limited tissue distribution (see, e.g., Tsutsui et al., Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms 16:1208-1218, 2011), potentially limiting the toxicity from CDK19 inhibition, while CDK8, CDK9, and BRD4 knockouts are lethal (see, e.g., Brown et al., Mamm Genome 23:632-640, 2012; Westerling, Molecular and Cellular Biology 27:6177-6182, 2007; and Houzelstein et al., Molecular and Cellular Biology 22, 3794-3802, 2002). In addition, the limited expression of CDK19 in tissues could broaden the therapeutic window to enable the otherwise toxic inhibition of stem cell pathways such as NOTCH, or critical processes, such as G2/M checkpoint. Our studies showingthat small molecule inhibition of CDK19 impaired PDX growth affirms the potential of therapeutically targeting CDK19 in TNBC.
5. References1 Bauer, K. R., Brown, M., Cress, R. D., Parise, C. A. & Caggiano, V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer 109, 1721-1728, doi:10.1002/cncr.22618 (2007).
2 Tsutsui, T., Fukasawa, R., Tanaka, A., Hirose, Y. & Okhuma, Y. Identification of target genes for the CDK subunits of the Mediator complex. Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms 16, 1208-1218, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01565.x (2011).
3 Brown, S. D. & Moore, M. W. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping. Mamm Genome 23, 632-640, doi:10.1007/s00335-012-9427-x (2012).
4 Diehl, P., Tedesco, D. & Chenchik, A. Use of RNAi screens to uncover resistance mechanisms in cancer cells and identify synthetic lethal interactions. Drug Discov Today Technol 11, 11-18, doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2013.12.002 (2014).
5 Lee, C. Y. et al. Neuregulin autocrine signaling promotes self-renewal of breast tumor-initiating cells by triggering HER2/HER3 activation. Cancer Res 74, 341-352, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1055 (2014).
6 Nolan-Stevaux, O. et al. Measurement of Cancer Cell Growth Heterogeneity through Lentiviral Barcoding Identifies Clonal Dominance as a Characteristic of Tumor Engraftment. PloS one 8, e67316, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067316 (2013).
7 Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet 45, 1113-1120, doi:10.1038/ng.2764 (2013).
8 Broude, E. V. et al. Expression of CDK8 and CDK8-interacting Genes as Potential Biomarkers in Breast Cancer. Current cancer drug targets 15, 739-749 (2015).
9 Porter, D. C. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 8 mediates chemotherapy-induced tumor-promoting paracrine activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 13799-13804, doi:10.1073/pnas.1206906109 (2012).
10 Galbraith, M. D., Donner, A. J. & Espinosa, J. M. CDK8: a positive regulator of transcription. Transcription 1, 4-12, doi:10.4161/trns.1.1.12373 (2010).
11 Robertson, F. M. et al. Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 60, 351-375, doi:10.3322/caac.20082 (2010).
12 Al-Hajj, M., Wicha, M. S., Benito-Hernandez, A., Morrison, S. J. & Clarke, M. F. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 3983-3988, doi:10.1073/pnas.0530291100 (2003).
13 Lim, E. et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nature medicine 15, 907-913, doi:10.1038/nm.2000 (2009).
14 Prat, A. et al. Characterization of cell lines derived from breast cancers and normal mammary tissues for the study of the intrinsic molecular subtypes. Breast cancer research and treatment 142, 237-255, doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2743-3 (2013).
15 Scheeren, F. A. et al. A cell-intrinsic role for TLR2-MYD88 in intestinal and breast epithelia and oncogenesis. Nature cell biology 16, 1238-1248, doi:10.1038/ncb3058 (2014).
16 Bachelard-Cascales, E. et al. The CD10 enzyme is a key player to identify and regulate human mammary stem cells. Stem cells 28, 1081-1088, doi:10.1002/stem.435 (2010).
17 Hu, Y. & Smyth, G. K. ELDA: extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays. Journal of immunological methods 347, 70-78, doi:10.1016/j.jim.2009.06.008 (2009).
18 Sato, S. et al. A set of consensus mammalian mediator subunits identified by multidimensional protein identification technology. Molecular cell 14, 685-691, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.006 (2004).
19 Firestein, R. et al. CDK8 is a colorectal cancer oncogene that regulates beta-catenin activity. Nature 455, 547-551, doi:10.1038/nature07179 (2008).
20 Pelish, H. E. et al. Mediator kinase inhibition further activates super-enhancer-associated genes in AML. Nature 526, 273-276, doi:10.1038/nature14904 (2015).
21 Kapoor, A. et al. The histone variant macroH2A suppresses melanoma progression through regulation of CDK8. Nature 468, 1105-1109, doi:10.1038/nature09590 (2010).
22 Galbraith, M. D. et al. HIF1A employs CDK8-mediator to stimulate RNAPII elongation in response to hypoxia. Cell 153, 1327-1339, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.048 (2013).
23 Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 15545-15550, doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 (2005).
24 Liberzon, A. et al. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell systems 1, 417-425, doi:10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004 (2015).
25 Kalimutho, M. et al. Targeted Therapies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Combating a Stubborn Disease. Trends in pharmacological sciences 36, 822-846, doi:10.1016/j.tips.2015.08.009 (2015).
26 Chen, M. et al. CDK8/19 Mediator kinases potentiate induction of transcription by NFkappaB. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, doi:10.1073/pnas.1710467114 (2017).
27 Audetat, K. A. et al. A Kinase-Independent Role for Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 19 in p53 Response. Molecular and cellular biology 37, doi:10.1128/MCB.00626-16 (2017).
28 Melotte, V. et al. The N-myc downstream regulated gene (NDRG) family: diverse functions, multiple applications. FASEB J 24, 4153-4166, doi:10.1096/fj.09-151464 (2010).
29 Zarnegar, M. A., Reinitz, F., Newman, A.M., Clarke, M.F. Targeted chromatin ligation, a robust epigenetic profiling technique for small cell numbers. Nucleic Acids Research, doi:10.1093/nar/gkx648 (2017).
30 Bae, D. H. et al. The role of NDRG1 in the pathology and potential treatment of human cancers. J Clin Pathol 66, 911-917, doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201692 (2013).
31 Brown, J. D. et al. NF-kappaB directs dynamic super enhancer formation in inflammation and atherogenesis. Molecular cell 56, 219-231, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.024 (2014).
32 Nabet, B. et al. Deregulation of the Ras-Erk Signaling Axis Modulates the Enhancer Landscape. Cell Rep 12, 1300-1313, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.078 (2015).
33 Tripathi, S. et al. Meta- and Orthogonal Integration of Influenza “OMICs” Data Defines a Role for UBR4 in Virus Budding. Cell host & microbe 18, 723-735, doi:10.1016/j.chom.2015.11.002 (2015).
34 Mallinger, A. et al. Discovery of Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Small-Molecule Modulators of the Mediator Complex-Associated Kinases CDK8 and CDK19. Journal of medicinal chemistry 59, 1078-1101, doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01685 (2016).
35 Poss, Z. C. et al. Identification of Mediator Kinase Substrates in Human Cells using Cortistatin A and Quantitative Phosphoproteomics. Cell Rep 15, 436-450, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.030 (2016).
36 Bolden, J. E. et al. Inducible in vivo silencing of Brd4 identifies potential toxicities of sustained BET protein inhibition. Cell Rep 8, 1919-1929, doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.025 (2014).
37 Takebe, N. et al. Targeting Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: clinical update. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12, 445-464, doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.61 (2015).
38 Westerling, T., Kuuluvainen, E. & Makela, T. P. Cdk8 is essential for preimplantation mouse development. Molecular and cellular biology 27, 6177-6182, doi:10.1128/MCB.01302-06 (2007).
39 Houzelstein, D. et al. Growth and early postimplantation defects in mice deficient for the bromodomain-containing protein Brd4. Molecular and cellular biology 22, 3794-3802 (2002).
40 Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676-682, doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 (2012).
41 Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal 6, pl1, doi:10.1126/scisignal.2004088 (2013).
While the foregoing invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the relevant arts, once they have been made familiar with this disclosure, that various changes in form and detail can be made without departing from the true scope of the invention in the appended claims. The invention is therefore not to be limited to the exact components or details of methodology or construction set forth above. Except to the extent necessary or inherent in the processes themselves, no particular order to steps or stages of methods or processes described in this disclosure, including the Figures, is intended or implied. In many cases the order of process steps may be varied without changing the purpose, effect, or import of the methods described.
All publications and patent documents cited herein are incorporated herein by reference as if each such publication or document was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated herein by reference. Citation of publications and patent documents (patents, published patent applications, and unpublished patent applications) is not intended as an admission that any such document is pertinent prior art, nor does it constitute any admission as to the contents or date of the same.
CDK19 Transcript Variant 1 (NM_015076.4) (SEQ ID NO: 12)
CDK19 Transcript Variant 2 (NM_001300960.1) (SEQ ID NO: 13)
CDK19 Transcript Variant 3 (NM_001300963.1) (SEQ ID NO: 14)
CDK19 Transcript Variant 4 (NM_001300964.1) (SEQ ID NO: 15)
Cyclin dependent kinase 8 (CDK8), transcript variant 1 (NM_001260.2) (SEQ ID NO: 16)
Cyclin dependent kinase 8 (CDK8), transcript variant 2 (NM_001318368.1) (SEQ ID NO: 17)
Cyclin dependent kinase 8 (CDK8), transcript variant 3 (NM_001346501.1) (SEQ ID NO: 18)
Claims
1. A method of treating a patient diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), comprising administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits expression or activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19), wherein the agent comprises a small molecule inhibitor of CDK19 activity, and wherein administration of the agent results in at least one of a reduction in cachexia, increase in survival time, elongation in time to tumor progression, reduction in tumor mass, reduction in tumor burden, prolongation in time to tumor metastasis, a prolongation in time to tumor recurrence, tumor response, complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, or progression free survival.
2. A method of treating a patient diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), wherein the cancer is characterized by a tumor comprising EpCAMmed/high and CD10-/low epithelial cells, the method comprising administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19) expression or activity, wherein the agent is a small molecule inhibitor of CDK19 activity, wherein the treatment reduces the number of EpCAMmed/high and CD10-/low cells in the tumor, reduces to number of EpCAMmed/high and CD10-/low cells per unit volume of the tumor, or results in a reduction of the ratio of EpCAMmed/high and CD10-/low epithelial cells to normal cells in the tumor.
3. A method of reducing metastasis of TNBC in a patient, the method comprising administering a therapeutically effective dose of an agent that inhibits expression or activity of CDK19, wherein the agent is a small molecule inhibitor of CDK19 activity.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the patient is treated with a combination therapy comprising (a) an agent that inhibits expression or activity of CDK19 and (b) radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy.
5. The method of claim 1, comprising detecting EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells in a tissue sample from the patient prior to or after initiating therapy.
6. (canceled)
7. The method of any of claim 1 wherein the agent inhibits expression or activity of CDK19 to a greater extent than it inhibits expression or activity of CDK8.
8. The method of claim 1 claim 1 wherein the agent is a small molecule inhibitor that binds to the ATP binding site of CDK19 to inhibit its activity.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent binds to parts of CDK19 outside of the ATP binding site.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent binds to CDK19 with a higher affinity than to CDK8.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the agent is a small molecule inhibitor other than one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of Cortistatin A, Sorafenib, Linifanib, Ponatinib, Senexin B, CCT251545, and CCT251921.
12-15. (canceled)
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent binds CDK 19 in the cytoplasm of a breast epithelial cell.
17. A method of predicting the likely therapeutic responsiveness of a subject with TNBC to the method of treatment of claim 1 comprising:
- (a) quantitating EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells in a tumor sample obtained from the subject;
- (b) comparing the quantity of EpCAMmed/high/CD10′/low cells in (a) to a reference value characteristic of tumors responsive to a CDK19 targeting therapy, and
- (c) treating the patient with the agent that inhibits expression or activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 19 (CDK19) if the quantity of EpCAMmed/high/CD10-/low cells is equal to or exceeds the reference value.
18. The method of claim 2, wherein the agent inhibits expression or activity of CDK 19 to a greater extent than it inhibits expression or activity of CDK8.
19. The method of claim 2, wherein the agent is a small molecule inhibitor other than one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of Cortistatin A, Sorafenib, Linifanib, Ponatinib, Senexin B, CCT251545, and CCT251921.
20. The method of claim 3, comprising detecting EpCAMmed/high/CD10′/low cells in a tissue sample from the patient prior to the administering.
21. The method of claim 3, wherein the agent inhibits expression or activity of CDK 19 to a greater extent than it inhibits expression or activity of CDK8.
22. The method of claim 3, wherein the agent binds to CDK19 with a higher affinity than to CDK8.
23. The method of claim 3, wherein the agent is a small molecule inhibitor that binds to the ATP binding site of CDK19 to inhibit its activity.
24. The method of claim 3, wherein the agent binds to parts of CDK19 outside of the ATP binding site.
25. The method of claim 3, wherein the agent is a small molecule inhibitor other than one or more compounds selected from the group consisting of Cortistatin A, Sorafenib, Linifanib, Ponatinib, Senexin B, CCT251545, and CCT251921.
Type: Application
Filed: Aug 29, 2022
Publication Date: Sep 14, 2023
Inventors: Michael F. Clarke (Stanford, CA), Robert W. Hsieh (Stanford, CA)
Application Number: 17/823,028