Novel purification process
Crude phenol and also individual phenol fractions from tars or the hydrogenation of coal are purified from contaminating organic bases and sulfur compounds by treating the phenols with phthalic acid anhydride and optionally a quinone and distillation.
Latest Rutgerswerke AG Patents:
Crude phenols and phenol fractions from tars or hydrogenation of coal contain organic bases and sulfur compounds which are very difficult to separate from the phenols and then only by individual process steps as indicated in Dienchs/Kubicka Phenole and Basen, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1958, pp 344 ff.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTIONIt is an object of the invention to provide a simple and economical process for the simultaneous removal of nitrogen and sulfur containing impurities from phenolic compositions.
This and other objects and advantages of the invention will become obvious from the following detailed description.
IN THE INVENTIONThe novel process of the invention for simultaneously removing organic bases and sulfur compounds from phenolic fractions comprises reacting the phenolic fractions at elevated temperatures with phthalic acid anhydride and distilling the mixture to obtain a purified phenol.
It has been found that by thermal treatment of phenols with 1 to 5% by weight of phthalic acid anhydride (PAA) and subsequent fractional distillation, the content of both bases and sulfur of the phenols is reduced. At the same time, the color stability is increased as well. A further improvement of the purification action and also improvement of the color stability is achieved if in the thermal treatment with phthalic acid anhydride, small amounts i.e. 0.01 to 0.5% by weight, based on the quantity of phenols, of a quinone are added. This is especially surprising inasmuch as by treatment with quinone along, no effect is obtained.
Examples of quinones are all para-or amphi-quinones such as e.g. benzoquinone, napththoquinone, anthraquinone or the respective alkyl-substituted quinones. The best results are obtained with the use of anthraquinone. Here it was found that as thermal treatment the heat treatment occurring in a distillation under mild conditions is sufficient if crude phenols are used which have a high disulfide content and a relatively low content of mercapto groups.
The process of the invention comprises by mixing the crude phenol or the phenol fraction to be treated with the phthalic acid anhydride or with the phthalic acid anhydride and quinone and heating with stirring for several hours i.e., 5 to 30 hours at a temperature in the range of 100.degree. to 180.degree. C. Then, the reaction mixture is fractionally distilled and the undesired impurities remain in the distillation residue.
In an improved embodiment, the phenols are admixed with 1 to 5% by weight of phthalic acid anhydride or respectively with 1 to 5% by weight phtalic acid anhydride and 0.01 to 0.5% by weight of a quinone, based on the amount of phenol and optionally an aromatic hydrocarbon and are heated for 5 to 30 hours at reflux. This is followed by fractional distillation, preferably under vacuum. Preferred aromatic hydrocarbons are those boiling in the range of 100.degree. to 150.degree. C., such as e.g. toluene, ethylbenzene or xylenes.
In the preferred embodiment, the phenols whose content of disulfide groups had been increased by previous oxidative treatment, are admixed with 1 to 5% by weight of phthalic acid anhydride and 0.01 to 0.5% by weight of anthraquinone and are distilled at as low as possible a sump temperature and with a short dwell time. Such a distillation under mild conditions is e.g. a distillation under vacuum, i.e. 30-80 mbars, preferably in short-path distilling apparatus such as thin-layer or falling film vaporizers.
A further simplification in the handling of the high melting point substances of phthalic acid anhydride and quinone consists in dissolving these reactants in high-boiling phenols and they can be charged in solution form which is easy to proportion, and there remains a distillation residue easy to handle.
In the following examples there are described several preferred embodiments to illustrate the invention. However, it is to be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific examples.
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 1
4,000 g of crude phenol of the following composition
______________________________________
phenol 61.6%
o-cresol 10.35%
m/p cresol 20.15%
2,6 dimethyl phenol 0.55%
o-ethyl phenol 0.20%
2,4/2,5-dimethyl phenol 3.10%
3,5-dimethy1 pheno1 + m/p-ethyl phenol
2.45%
2,3 dimethyl phenol 0.30%
3,4-dimethyl phenol 0.30%
p-isopropyl phenol 0.90%
C.sub.9 -phenols 0.10%
______________________________________
were admixed with a solution of 100 g of phthalic acid anhydride (PAA), or respectively 100 g of phthalic acid anhydride and 0.8 g of anthraquinone in high-boiling phenols as well as with 200 ml of xylene (isomeric mixture) and the mixture was refluxed for 24 hours. Then, the reaction mixture was fractionally distilled at 133 mbars. The following Table 1 shows the results obtained in comparison with a crude phenol sample subjected to the same procedure, but to which neither phthalic acid anhydride nor anthraquinone had been added (control). The respective values for the individual phenol fractions are found in Tables 2 and 3. Table 4 shows the color stabilities of the individual fractions measured after 24 days by the method of ASTM 1986-61.
TABLE 1
______________________________________
Combined removal of organic base and sulfur impurities of crude
phenol (total distillate)
PAA +
anthra-
Agent: PAA quinone Control
______________________________________
Distillation yield
95% 92% 93%
Base reduction in total distillate
82% 86% 60%
referred to base content in
charge
Base content in total distillate
298 ppm 240 ppm 683 ppm
Sulfur reduction in total distillate
52% 82% 31%
referred to sulfur content in
charge
Sulfur content in total distillate
112 ppm 43 ppm 163 ppm
______________________________________
TABLE 2
______________________________________
Debasing of crude phenol PAA + Con-
Agent: PAA anthraquinone
trol
______________________________________
Base content (ppm) in:
Phenol first running
3 (-99).sup.1
6 (-97.9).sup.1
284
Phenol 6 -- 2 -- 6
o-Cresol 170 (-92.4)
129 (-94.3) 2251
m/p Cresol 559 (-64.5)
640 (-59.3) 1574
______________________________________
.sup.1 In parentheses: Deviation of the base content from the control in
%.
TABLE 3
______________________________________
Desulfuring of
of crude phenol PAA +
Agent: PAA anthraquinone
Control
______________________________________
Sulfur content
(ppm) in:
Phenol first running
296 (-82.6).sup.1
327 (-80.8).sup.1
1708
Phenol 17 (-37) 16 (-40.7)
27
o-Cresol 16 (-63.6 11 (-75.0)
44
m/p-Cresol 31 (-44.8) 17 (-74.6)
67
______________________________________
.sup.1 In parentheses: Deviation of the sulfur content from the control i
%.
TABLE 4
______________________________________
Color stability of the crude phenol fractions
PAA +
Agent: PAA anthraquinon
Control
______________________________________
Color of the fraction
after 24 days (Apha)
Phenol first running
100 20 >250
Phenol 85 25 >250
o-Cresol 10 20 100
m/p-Cresol 7 25 >250
______________________________________
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2
______________________________________
Test A: Crude phenol charged (high conversion to disulfide)
Total sulfur content: 165 ppm
Mercapto sulfur: 5 ppm
Bases 1616 ppm
Test B: Crude phenol charged (low conversion to disulfide)
Total sulfur: 240 ppm
Mercapto sulfur 184 ppm
Bases: 1010 ppm
______________________________________
In both crude phenols, 2.5% by weight of phthalic acid anhydride and 0.2% by weight of anthraquinone were dissolved, and these solutions were distilled without further thermal pretreatment within 45 minutes at 66 mbars. The distillation reduction was 90%. The results obtained are listed in Table 5.
TABLE 5
__________________________________________________________________________
Temperature
Bases in
Degree of
Sulfur in
Degree of
Crude phenol
Head Sump distillate
debasing
distillate
desulfur-
type .degree.C.
.degree.C.
ppm % ppm ing, %
__________________________________________________________________________
A 106-117
114-130
246 86.3 4 97.8
B 106-117
114-130
154 86.2 176 34.0
__________________________________________________________________________
Various modifications of the process of the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof and it is to be understood that the invention is intended to be limited only as defined in the appended claims.
Claims
1. A process for simultaneously removing organic bases and sulfur compounds from phenolic fractions from tars or hydrogenation of coal comprising reacting the phenolic fraction at temperatures of about 100.degree. to 180.degree. with phthalic acid anhydride and distilling the mixture to obtain a purified phenol.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein a quinone is added with the phthalic acid anhydride.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the amount of quinone is 0.01 to 0.5% by weight.
4. The process of claim 2 wherein the quinone is another quinone.
5. The process of claim 4 wherein the reaction at elevated temperature occurs with a distillation under mild conditions.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the phthalic acid anhydride is added as to solution in a high-boiling phenol.
7. The process of claim 2 wherein the phthalic acid anhydride and quinone are added as a solution in a high-boiling phenol.
8. A process for simultaneously removing organic bases and sulfur containing compounds from phenolic containing compositions comprising refluxing a mixture of the phenolic containing composition, an aromatic hydrocarbon and 1 to 5% by weight of phthalic acid anhydride for 5 to 30 hours and subjecting the mixture to vacuum distillation.
- Mark, "Chemical Abstracts" vol. 89 (1978) 89:129251z. Bridwell, "Chemical Abstracts" vol. 89 (1978) 89:129254c. Hoeringklee, "Chemical Abstracts" vol. 102 (1985) 102:45616w.
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 13, 1989
Date of Patent: Feb 12, 1991
Assignee: Rutgerswerke AG
Inventors: Jorg Talbiersky (Dorsten), Bernhard Wefringhaus (Castrop-Rauxel), Konrad Stolzenberg (Waltrop), Wolfgang Bergins (Castrop-Rauxel)
Primary Examiner: Werren B. Lone
Law Firm: Bierman and Muserlian
Application Number: 7/450,050
International Classification: C07C 3774; C07C 3768;
