Color flat panel display sub-pixel arrangements and layouts

- Clairvoyante, Inc.

An array comprising a plurality of three-color pixel elements is disclosed. The three-color pixel element has square design disposed at the origin of an X, Y coordinate system. Disposed at the center of the square is a blue emitter. Red emitters are disposed in the second and fourth quadrants not occupied by the blue emitter and green emitters are disposed in the first and third quadrants not occupied by the blue emitter. The blue emitter is square shaped, having corners aligned at the X and Y axes of the coordinate system, and the opposing pairs of red and green emitters are generally square shaped, having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to the sides of the blue emitter. The plurality of three-color pixel elements may be arranged in rows and columns to form a display. Each emitter has a transistor. The column lines and row lines are doubled to allow for the transistors of the red emitters and green emitters to be gathered together into the interstitial corners between the three-color pixel elements creating combined transistor groups. With the transistors grouped together, the combined transistors groups and the blue emitters both become less visible, virtually vanishing from sight almost entirely.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims the benefit of the date of the U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/290,103, entitled “Improvements to Color Flat Panel Display Sub-Pixel Arrangements and Layouts”, filed on May 9, 2001, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

The present application relates to improvements to display layouts, and specifically to improved color pixel arrangements and means of addressing used in displays.

The present state of the art of color single plane imaging matrix, for flat panel displays use the red-green-blue (RGB) color triad or a single color in a vertical stripe as shown in prior art FIG. 1. Prior art FIG. 1 shows an arrangement 10 having several three-color pixel elements with red emitters (or sub-pixels) 14, blue emitters 16, and green emitters 12. The arrangement takes advantage of the Von Bezold effect by separating the three colors and placing equal spatial frequency weight on each color. However, this panel suffers because of inadequate attention to how human vision operates. These types of panels are a poor match to human vision.

Full color perception is produced in the eye by three-color receptor nerve cell types called cones. The three types are sensitive to different wavelengths of light: long, medium, and short (“red”, “green”, and “blue”, respectively). The relative density of the three differs significantly from one another. There are slightly more red receptors than green receptors. There are very few blue receptors compared to red or green receptors.

The human vision system processes the information detected by the eye in several perceptual channels: luminance, chromanance, and motion. Motion is only important for flicker threshold to the imaging system designer. The luminance channel takes the input from only the red and green receptors. It is “color blind”. It processes the information in such a manner that the contrast of edges is enhanced. The chromanance channel does not have edge contrast enhancement. Since the luminance channel uses and enhances every red and green receptor, the resolution of the luminance channel is several times higher than the chromanance channels. The blue receptor contribution to luminance perception is negligible. The luminance channel acts as a resolution band pass filter. Its peak response is at 35 cycles per degree (cycles/°). It limits the response at 0 cycles/° and at 50 cycles/° in the horizontal and vertical axis. This means that the luminance channel can only tell the relative brightness between two areas within the field of view. It cannot tell the absolute brightness. Further, if any detail is finer than 50 cycles/°, it simply blends together. The limit in the diagonal axes is significantly lower.

The chromanance channel is further subdivided into two sub-channels, to allow us to see full color. These channels are quite different from the luminance channel, acting as low pass filters. One can always tell what color an object is, no matter how big it is in our field of view. The red/green chromanance sub-channel resolution limit is at 8 cycles/°, while the yellow/blue chromanance sub-channel resolution limit is at 4 cycles/°. Thus, the error introduced by lowering the blue resolution by one octave will be barely noticeable by the most perceptive viewer, if at all, as experiments at Xerox and NASA, Ames Research Center (R. Martin, J. Gille, J. Larimer, Detectability of Reduced Blue Pixel Count in Projection Displays, SID Digest 1993) have demonstrated.

The luminance channel determines image details by analyzing the spatial frequency Fourier transform components. From signal theory, any given signal can be represented as the summation of a series of sine waves of varying amplitude and frequency. The process of teasing out, mathematically, these sine-wave-components of a given signal is called a Fourier Transform. The human vision system responds to these sine-wave-components in the two-dimensional image signal.

Color perception is influenced by a process called “assimilation” or the Von Bezold color blending effect. This is what allows separate color pixels (also known as sub-pixels or emitters) of a display to be perceived as a mixed color. This blending effect happens over a given angular distance in the field of view. Because of the relatively scarce blue receptors, this blending happens over a greater angle for blue than for red or green. This distance is approximately 0.25° for blue, while for red or green it is approximately 0.12°. At a viewing distance of twelve inches, 0.25° subtends 50 mils (1,270μ) on a display. Thus, if the blue pixel pitch is less than half (625μ) of this blending pitch, the colors will blend without loss of picture quality. This blending effect is directly related to the chromanance sub-channel resolution limits described above. Below the resolution limit, one sees separate colors, above the resolution limit, one sees the combined color.

Examining the conventional RGB stripe display in prior art FIG. 1, the design assumes that all three colors have the same resolution. The design also assumes that the luminance information and the chromanance information have the same spatial resolution. Further, keeping in mind that the blue sub-pixel is not perceived by the human luminance channel and is therefore seen as a black dot, and since the blue sub-pixel is aligned in stripes, the human viewer sees vertical black lines on the screen as shown in FIG. 2. The image displayed has large areas of white space, such as when displaying black text on a white background. These stripes are viewed as a distracting screen artifact. Typical higher resolution prior art displays have pixel densities of 90 pixels per inch. At an average viewing distance of 18 inches, this represents approximately 28 pixels per degree or approximately 14 cycles/°, when showing lines and spaces at the highest Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) allowed by the display. However, what the luminance channel sees is an approximately 28 cycles/° signal horizontally across a white image when considering that the blue sub-pixel 12 is dark compared to the red 14 and green 16 emitters, as shown in prior art FIG. 2. This 28 cycles/° artifact is closer to the peak luminance channel response spatial frequency, 35 cycles/°, than the desired image signal, 14 cycles/°, thus competing for the viewer's attention.

Thus, the prior art arrangement of three-color emitters is shown to be a poor match to human vision.

SUMMARY

A system of addressing an array of color pixels for a flat panel display is disclosed. More particularly, the layout of column and row drive lines and transistors of three-color pixel element of spaced-apart emitters is disclosed.

The three-color pixel element has square design disposed at the origin of an X, Y coordinate system. Disposed at the center of the square is a blue emitter. Red emitters are disposed in the second and fourth quadrants not occupied by the blue emitter and green emitters are disposed in the first and third quadrants not occupied by the blue emitter. The blue emitter is square shaped, having corners aligned at the X and Y axes of the coordinate system, and the opposing pairs of red and green emitters are generally square shaped, having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to the sides of the blue emitter. The plurality of three-color pixel elements may be arranged in rows and columns to form a display. This array provides better perceived resolution and appearance of single full color displays by matching the human vision system.

Each emitter has a transistor and associated components or structures, such as capacitors. The column lines and row lines are doubled to allow for the transistors and associated structures of the red emitters and green emitters to be gathered together at the interstitial corners between the three-color pixel elements creating combined transistor groups. With the transistors grouped together, the combined transistors groups and the blue emitters both become less visible at 56 cycles/°, virtually vanishing from sight almost entirely.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Referring now to the figures, wherein like elements are numbered alike:

FIG. 1 illustrates a prior art RGB stripe arrangement of three-color pixel elements in an array, a single plane, for a display device;

FIG. 2 illustrates a prior art RGB stripe arrangement as it would be perceived by the luminance channel of the human vision system when a full white image is displayed;

FIG. 3 illustrates an arrangement of three-color pixel elements in an array, in a single plane, for a display device;

FIG. 4 illustrates the arrangement of FIG. 3, as the luminance channel of the human vision system would perceive it when a full white image is displayed;

FIG. 5 illustrates a layout of drive lines and transistors for the arrangement of pixel elements of FIG. 4; and

FIG. 6 illustrates the arrangement of FIG. 5, as it would be perceived by the luminance channel of the human vision system, prior to filtering, when a full white image is displayed.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons.

FIG. 3 illustrates an arrangement 20 of several three-color pixel elements according to a preferred embodiment. A three-color pixel element 21 consists of a blue emitter (or sub-pixel) 22, two red emitters 24, and two green emitters 26 in a square, which is described as follows. The three-color pixel element 21 is square shaped and is centered at the origin of an X, Y coordinate system. The blue emitter 22 is centered at the origin of the square and extends into the first, second, third, and fourth quadrants of the X, Y coordinate system. A pair of red emitters 24 are disposed in opposing quadrants (i.e., the second and the fourth quadrants), and a pair of green emitters 26 are disposed in opposing quadrants (i.e., the first and the third quadrants), occupying the portions of the quadrants not occupied by the blue emitter 22. As shown in FIG. 3, the blue emitter 22 can be square-shaped, having corners aligned at the X and Y axes of the coordinate system, and the opposing pairs of red 24 and green 26 emitters can be generally square shaped, having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to the sides of the blue emitter 22.

The array is repeated across a panel to complete a device with a desired matrix resolution. The repeating three-color pixels form a “checker board” of alternating red 24 and green 26 emitters with blue emitters 22 distributed evenly across the device. However, the blue emitters 22 are at half the resolution of the red 24 and green 26 emitters.

One advantage of the three-color pixel element array is improved resolution of color displays. This occurs since only the red and green emitters contribute significantly to the perception of high resolution in the luminance channel. Thus, reducing the number of blue emitters and replacing some with red and green emitters improves resolution by more closely matching human vision.

Dividing the red and green emitters in half in the vertical axis to increase spatial addressability is an improvement over the conventional vertical single color stripe of the prior art. An alternating “checkerboard” of red and green emitters allows the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), high spatial frequency resolution, to increase in both the horizontal and the vertical axes. A further advantage of this arrangement over prior art is the shape and location of the blue emitter.

In the prior art arrangement of FIG. 1, the blue emitters are in stripes. When viewed, the luminance channel of the human vision system sees these blue emitters as black stripes alternating with white stripes, as illustrated in prior art FIG. 2. In the horizontal direction, there are faint, but discernable lines between rows of three-color pixel elements, largely due to the presence of the transistors, and/or associated structures, such as capacitors, at each emitter, as is common in the art. However, with the arrangement of FIG. 3, when viewed, the luminance channel of the human vision system sees black dots alternating with white dots as illustrated in FIG. 4. This is an improvement because the spatial frequency, Fourier Transform wave component, energy is now spread into every axis, vertical, diagonal, as well as horizontal, reducing the amplitude of the original horizontal signal, and thus, the visual response (i.e., visibility).

FIG. 5 illustrates a preferred embodiment wherein only four three-color pixel elements 32, 34, 36, and 38 are grouped in arrangement 30, while several thousand can be arranged in an array. Column address drive lines 40, 42, 44, 46, and 48 and row address drive line 50 drive each three color pixel element 32, 34, 36, and 38. Each emitter has a transistor, and possibly associated structures such as a capacitor, which may be a sample/hold transistor/capacitor circuit. Therefore, each blue emitter 22 has a transistor 52, each red emitter 24 has a transistor 54, and each green emitter 26 has a transistor 56. Having two column lines 44 and two row lines 50 allows for the transistors, and/or associated structures, for the red emitters and green emitters to be gathered together into the interstitial corners between the three-color pixel elements 32, 34, 36, and 38 creating combined transistor groups 58.

The grouping of the transistors and/or associated structures, such as capacitors, in the interstitial corners appears to be counter to good design practice, as understood in the prior art, since collecting them together makes them a bigger, and thus more visible dark spot, as shown in FIG. 6. However, in this circumstance these dark spots are exactly halfway between the blue emitter 22 in each three-color pixel element.

In this embodiment, the spatial frequency of the combined transistor groups and/or associated structures, 58 and the blue emitter 22 is doubled, pushing them above the 50 cycles/° resolution limit of the luminance channel of human vision. For example, in a 90 pixel per inch display panel the blue emitter pitch, without the grouped transistors, would create a 28 cycles/° luminance channel signal, both horizontally and vertically. In other words, the blue emitters may be visible as a texture on solid white areas of a display. However, they will not be as visible as the stripes visible in the prior art.

In contrast, with the transistors grouped together, the combined group transistors 58 and the blue emitters 22 both become less visible at 56 cycles/°, virtually vanishing from sight almost entirely. In other words, the grouping of the transistors and the blue emitters combine to produce a texture on solid white areas of a display too fine for the human visual system to see. In using this embodiment, the solid white areas become as smooth looking as a sheet of paper.

The grouping of the transistors, and/or associated structures, and placement of the blue emitters work together to match to human vision. In contrast to the prior art, which creates black lines with the placement of the blue emitters and transistor, the arrangement of the present invention removes this problem. In placing the transistors in accordance with the above arrangements, the transistors and blue emitters vanish from sight almost entirely providing a smooth looking display without a visible texture.

While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. An array, comprising:

a plurality of three-color pixel elements, wherein each said three-color pixel element comprises:
a blue emitter disposed at a center of a square disposed at an origin of an X, Y coordinate system having a first, a second, a third, and a fourth quadrant, wherein said blue emitter is square-shaped;
a pair of red emitters spaced apart from said blue emitter and symmetrically disposed about said blue emitter in said second and said fourth quadrants, wherein said red emitters occupy a portion of said second and said fourth quadrants not occupied by said blue emitter, wherein said red emitters are generally square-shaped having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to sides of said blue emitter;
a pair of green emitters spaced apart from said blue emitter and symmetrically disposed about said blue emitter in said first and said third quadrants, wherein said green emitters occupy a portion of said first and said third quadrants not occupied by said blue emitter, wherein said green emitters are generally square-shaped having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to said sides of said blue emitter;
wherein said array is repeated across a panel to complete a device with a desired matrix resolution forming a checker board of alternating said red emitters and said green emitters with said blue emitters distributed evenly across said device, wherein said blue emitters are at half resolution of said red emitters and said green emitters;
a first transistor for said blue emitter, a second transistor for said red emitter, and a third transistor for said green emitter, wherein said second and third transistors are grouped together at interstitial corners between said three-color pixel elements; and
column lines and row lines connecting to said first, second, and third transistors, wherein two of said column lines and two of said row lines are coupled to said second and third transistors in said interstitial corners.

2. The array of claim 1, further comprising associated structures connected to said first, second, and third transistors.

3. The array of claim 2, wherein said associated structures are capacitors.

4. An array, comprising:

a plurality of three-color pixel elements, wherein each said three-color pixel element comprises:
a blue emitter disposed at a center of a square disposed at an origin of an X, Y coordinate system having a first, a second, a third, and a fourth quadrant, wherein said blue emitter is square-shaped;
a pair of red emitters spaced apart from said blue emitter and symmetrically disposed about said blue emitter in said second and said fourth quadrants, wherein said red emitters occupy a portion of said second and said fourth quadrants not occupied by said blue emitter, wherein said red emitters are generally square-shaped having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to sides of said blue emitter;
a pair of green emitters spaced apart from said blue emitter and symmetrically disposed about said blue emitter in said first and said third quadrants, wherein said green emitters occupy a portion of said first and said third quadrants not occupied by said blue emitter, wherein said green emitters are generally square-shaped having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to said sides of said blue emitter; and
transistors coupled to said blue emitters, said red emitters, and said green emitters;
wherein said array is repeated across a panel to complete a device with a desired matrix resolution forming a checker board of alternating said red emitters and said green emitters with said blue emitters are distributed at a spatial frequency, wherein said blue emitters are at half resolution of said red emitters and said green emitters;
wherein said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters are grouped together at interstitial corners between said three-color pixel elements;
column lines and row lines connecting to said transistors, wherein two of said column lines and two of said row lines are coupled to said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters in said interstitial corners; and wherein said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters are disposed at locations in said array such that said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters are disposed at said spatial frequency said blue emitters and are 180 degrees out of phase with said blue emitters, said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters being sized to have a luminance value equal to a luminance value of said blue emitters.

5. The array of claim 4, further comprising associated structures connected to said transistors.

6. The array of claim 5, wherein said associated structures are capacitors.

7. The array of claim 4, wherein a radiance value of said red emitters and said green emitters is substantially equal to a radiance value of said blue emitters.

8. The array of claim 7, wherein said luminance value of said red emitters and said green emitters is substantially equal to said radiance value of said blue emitters is adjusted to provide a desired white color point.

9. An array, comprising:

a plurality of three-color pixel elements, wherein each said three-color pixel element comprises a blue emitter, a pair of red emitters, and a pair of green emitters arranged in a square design;
wherein said array is repeated across a panel to complete a device with a desired matrix resolution forming a checker board of alternating said red emitters and said green emitters with said blue emitters distributed evenly across said device, wherein said blue emitters are at half resolution of said red emitters and said green emitters;
a first transistor for said blue emitter, a second transistor for said red emitter, and a third transistor for said green emitter, wherein said second and third transistors are grouped together at interstitial corners between said three-color pixel elements; and
column lines and row lines connecting to said first, second, and third transistors, wherein two of said column lines and two of said row lines are coupled to said second and third transistors in said interstitial corners.

10. The array of claim 9, further comprising associated structures connected to said first, second, and third transistors.

11. The array of claim 10, wherein said associated structures are capacitors.

12. An array, comprising:

a plurality of three-color pixel elements, wherein each said three-color pixel element comprises a blue emitter, a pair of red emitters, and a pair of green emitters disposed in a square design, and transistors coupled to said blue emitters, said red emitters, and said green emitters;
wherein said array is repeated across a panel to complete a device with a desired matrix resolution forming a checker board of alternating said red emitters and said green emitters with said blue emitters are distributed at a spatial frequency, wherein said blue emitters are at half resolution of said red emitters and said green emitters;
wherein said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters are grouped together at interstitial corners between said three-color pixel elements;
column lines and row lines connecting to said transistors, wherein two of said column lines and two of said row lines are coupled to said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters in said interstitial corners; and
wherein said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters are disposed at locations in said array such that said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters are disposed at said spatial frequency of said blue emitters and are 180 degrees out of phase with said blue emitters, said transistors for said red emitters and said green emitters being sized to have a luminance value equal to a luminance value of said blue emitters.

13. The array of claim 12, further comprising associated structures connected to said transistors.

14. The array of claim 13, wherein said associated structures are capacitors.

15. The array of claim 12, wherein a radiance value of said red emitters and said green emitters is substantially equal to a radiance value of said blue emitters.

16. The array of claim 15, wherein said luminance value of said red emitters and said green emitters is substantially equal to said radiance value of said blue emitters is adjusted to provide a desired white color point.

17. A pixel element for a display comprising:

a pair of red emitters disposed about an origin in a substantially rectangular coordinate system having four quadrants in a first pair of opposing quadrants;
a pair of green emitters disposed about said origin in said substantially said rectangular coordinate system in a second pair of opposing quadrants;
a blue emitter disposed at said origin of said rectangular coordinate system; wherein each said red emitter and said green emitter is coupled to a transistor and such that each such transistor for said red and green emitter is substantially located in a interstitial corner of said substantially rectangular coordinate system.

18. A display comprising substantially a plurality of three-color pixel elements, said three-color pixel element comprising:

a pair of red emitters;
a pair of green emitters; such that said red emitters and said green emitters substantially form a checkerboard pattern;
a blue emitter disposed at a center of said checkerboard pattern of said red emitters and green emitters; and
wherein each said red emitter and green emitter is connected to a transistor such that said transistors for said red and green emitters substantially form a dark spot in the interstitial corners between said pixel elements.

19. The display of claim 18 wherein each said emitter is independently addressable.

20. The display of claim 19 wherein each emitter is capable of being driven with a variable analog signal.

21. The display of claim 18 wherein said red emitters and said green emitters comprise a length approximately one half in the vertical axis to improve spatial addressability.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3971065 July 20, 1976 Bayer
4353062 October 5, 1982 Lorteije et al.
4593978 June 10, 1986 Mourey et al.
4642619 February 10, 1987 Togashi
4651148 March 17, 1987 Takeda et al.
4751535 June 14, 1988 Myers
4773737 September 27, 1988 Yokono et al.
4786964 November 22, 1988 Plummer et al.
4792728 December 20, 1988 Chang et al.
4800375 January 24, 1989 Silverstein et al.
4853592 August 1, 1989 Strathman
4874986 October 17, 1989 Menn et al.
4886343 December 12, 1989 Johnson
4908609 March 13, 1990 Stroomer
4920409 April 24, 1990 Yamagishi
4965565 October 23, 1990 Noguchi
4966441 October 30, 1990 Conner
4967264 October 30, 1990 Parulski
5006840 April 9, 1991 Hamada et al.
5052785 October 1, 1991 Takimoto et al.
5113274 May 12, 1992 Takahashi et al.
5132674 July 21, 1992 Bottorf
5144288 September 1, 1992 Hamada et al.
5184114 February 2, 1993 Brown
5233385 August 3, 1993 Sampsell
5311337 May 10, 1994 McCartney, Jr.
5315418 May 24, 1994 Sprague
5334996 August 2, 1994 Tamagaki
5341153 August 23, 1994 Benzschawel
5398066 March 14, 1995 Martinez-Uriegas et al.
5436747 July 25, 1995 Suzuki
5461503 October 24, 1995 Deffontaines et al.
5485293 January 16, 1996 Robinder
5535028 July 9, 1996 Bae et al.
5541653 July 30, 1996 Peters et al.
5559905 September 24, 1996 Greggain et al.
5561460 October 1, 1996 Katoh et al.
5563621 October 8, 1996 Silsby
5579027 November 26, 1996 Sakurai et al.
5646702 July 8, 1997 Akinwande et al.
5648793 July 15, 1997 Chen
5739802 April 14, 1998 Mosier
5754226 May 19, 1998 Yamada et al.
5767837 June 16, 1998 Hara
5792579 August 11, 1998 Phillips
5815101 September 29, 1998 Fonte
5821913 October 13, 1998 Mamiya
5870075 February 9, 1999 Yamazaki et al.
5949496 September 7, 1999 Kim
5973664 October 26, 1999 Badger
6002446 December 14, 1999 Eglit
6008868 December 28, 1999 Silverbrook
6034666 March 7, 2000 Kanai et al.
6037719 March 14, 2000 Yap et al.
6038031 March 14, 2000 Murphy
6049626 April 11, 2000 Kim
6061533 May 9, 2000 Kajiwara
6064363 May 16, 2000 Kwon
6097367 August 1, 2000 Kuriwaki et al.
6108122 August 22, 2000 Ulrich et al.
6144352 November 7, 2000 Matsuda et al.
6147664 November 14, 2000 Hansen
6160535 December 12, 2000 Park
6184853 February 6, 2001 Hebiguchi et al.
6184903 February 6, 2001 Omori
6188385 February 13, 2001 Hill et al.
6198507 March 6, 2001 Ishigami
6219025 April 17, 2001 Hill et al.
6225967 May 1, 2001 Hebiguchi
6225973 May 1, 2001 Hill et al.
6236390 May 22, 2001 Hitchcock
6239783 May 29, 2001 Hill et al.
6243055 June 5, 2001 Ferguson
6243070 June 5, 2001 Hill et al.
6271891 August 7, 2001 Ogawa et al.
6299329 October 9, 2001 Mui et al.
6326981 December 4, 2001 Mori et al.
6327008 December 4, 2001 Fujiyoshi
6332030 December 18, 2001 Manjunath
6335719 January 1, 2002 An et al.
6339434 January 15, 2002 West et al.
6348929 February 19, 2002 Acharya
6360023 March 19, 2002 Betrisey et al.
6377262 April 23, 2002 Hitchcock et al.
6392717 May 21, 2002 Kunzman
6393145 May 21, 2002 Betrisey et al.
6396505 May 28, 2002 Lui
6441867 August 27, 2002 Daly
6453067 September 17, 2002 Morgan et al.
6466618 October 15, 2002 Messing et al.
6476416 November 5, 2002 Ikeda
6486923 November 26, 2002 Maeshima et al.
6507350 January 14, 2003 Wilson
6542161 April 1, 2003 Koyama et al.
6545653 April 8, 2003 Takahara
6570584 May 27, 2003 Cok et al.
6590555 July 8, 2003 Su et al.
6597411 July 22, 2003 Selby et al.
6661429 December 9, 2003 Phan
6674430 January 6, 2004 Kaufman
6714206 March 30, 2004 Martin et al.
6738204 May 18, 2004 Chuang et al.
6750875 June 15, 2004 Keely, Jr.
6804407 October 12, 2004 Weldy
20010017515 August 30, 2001 Kusunoki et al.
20010017607 August 30, 2001 Kwon et al.
20010040645 November 15, 2001 Yamazaki
20020012071 January 31, 2002 Sun
20020015110 February 7, 2002 Elliott
20020017645 February 14, 2002 Yamazaki
20020122160 September 5, 2002 Kunzman
20020140831 October 3, 2002 Hayashi
20020190648 December 19, 2002 Bechtel et al.
20030006978 January 9, 2003 Fujiyoshi
20030011603 January 16, 2003 Koyama
20030011613 January 16, 2003 Booth, Jr.
20030043567 March 6, 2003 Hoelen et al.
20030071826 April 17, 2003 Goertzen
20030071943 April 17, 2003 Choo et al.
20030077000 April 24, 2003 Blinn
20030218618 November 27, 2003 Phan
20040213449 October 28, 2004 Safaee-Rad
20040247070 December 9, 2004 Ali
Foreign Patent Documents
299 09 537 October 1999 DE
199 23 527 November 2000 DE
199-23-527 November 2000 DE
199 23 527 November 2000 DE
201 09 354 September 2001 DE
0 158 366 October 1985 EP
0 203 005 November 1986 EP
0 322 106 June 1989 EP
0 671650 September 1995 EP
0 671 650 September 1995 EP
0 812 114 December 1997 EP
0 878 969 November 1998 EP
0 899604 March 1999 EP
1 261 014 November 2002 EP
1 381 020 January 2004 EP
2 133 912 August 1984 GB
2 146 478 April 1985 GB
60-107022 June 1985 JP
02-000826 January 1990 JP
03-78390 April 1991 JP
03-036239 May 1991 JP
06-102503 April 1994 JP
02-983027 November 1999 JP
WO 00/21067 April 2000 WO
WO 00/42564 July 2000 WO
WO 00/42762 July 2000 WO
WO 00/45365 August 2000 WO
WO 00/65432 November 2000 WO
WO 00/67196 November 2000 WO
WO 01/10112 February 2001 WO
WO 01/29817 April 2001 WO
WO 01/52546 July 2001 WO
WO 02/059685 August 2002 WO
WO 02/099557 December 2002 WO
WO 02/101644 December 2002 WO
WO 03/014819 February 2003 WO
Other references
  • Lee, Baek-woon et al., “40.5L: Late-News Paper: TFT-LCD with RGBW Color System,” SID 03 Digest, 2003, pp. 1212-1215.
  • Lee, Baek-woon et al.,“40.5L: Late-News Paper: TFT-LCD with RGBW Color System”, SID 03 Digest, 2003, pp. 1212-1215.
  • R. Martin et al.,“Detectability of reduced blue pixel count in projection displays”, Proceedings of the Society for Information Display Symposium Digest, pp. 606-609, May 1993.
  • Messing, Dean S. et al., “Improved Display Resolution of Subsampled Colour Images Using Subpixel Addressing” IEEE ICIO 2002.
  • Messing, Dean S. et al., “Subpixel Rendering on Non-Striped Colour Matrix Displays” 2003 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 2003, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Krantz, John H et al., “Color Matrix Display Image Quality: The Effects of Luminance and Spatial Sampling”, SID 90 Digest.
  • BrownElliott, C H., “Reducing Pixel Count Without Reducing Image Quality”, Information Display, 15:22-25, Dec. 1999.
  • Adobe Systems, Inc., website, 2002, http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/cooltype.html.
  • Betrisey, C., et al., “Displaced Filtering for Patterned Displays,” 2000, Society for Information Display (SID) 00 Digest, pp. 296-299.
  • Carvajal, D., “Big Publishers Looking Into Digital Books,” Apr. 3, 2000, The New York Times, Business/Financial Desk.
  • Elliott, C., “New Pixel Layout for PenTile Matrix,” Jan. 2002, Proceedings of the International Display Manufacturing Conference, pp. 115-117.
  • Gibson Research Corporation, website, “Sub-Pixel Font Rendering Technology, How It Works,” 2002, http://www.grc.com/ctwhat.html.
  • Microsoft Corporation, website, 2002, http://www.microsoft.com/reader/ppc/product/cleartype.html.
  • Microsoft Press Release, Nov. 15, 1998, Microsoft Research Announces Screen Display Breakthrough at COMDEX/Fall '98, PR Newswire.
  • Murch, M., “Visual Perception Basics,” 1987, SID, Seminar 2, Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, Oregon.
  • Wandell, Brian A., Stanford University, “Fundamentals of Vision: Behavior, Neuroscience and Computation,” Jun. 12, 1994, Society for Information Display (SID) Short Course S-2, Fairmont Hotel, San Jose, California.
  • C. Elliott, “Reducing Pixel Count without Reducing Image Quality”, Information Display, vol. 15, pp. 22-25, Dec. 1999.
  • C. Elliott, “Active Matrix Display Layout Optimization for Sub-pixel Image Rendering”, IDMC 2000, pp. 185-189, Aug. 2000.
  • H. Okumura, “A New Flicker-Reduction Drive Method for High-Resolution LCTVs”, SID '01 Digest, pp. 551-554, 2001, no month.
  • “ClearType magnified,” Wired Magazine, Nov. 8, 1999, Microsoft Typography, article posted Nov. 8, 1999, and last updated Jan. 27, 1999, © 1999 Microsoft Corporation, 1 page.
  • Credelle, Thomas L. et al., “P-00: MTF of High-Resolution PenTile Matrix™ Displays,” Eurodisplay 02 Digest, 2002, pp. 1-4.
  • Daly, Scott, “Analysis of Subtriad Addressing Algorithms by Visual System Models,” SID Symp. Digest, Jun. 2001, pp. 1200-1203.
  • Elliott, Candice H. Brown et al., “Color Subpixel Rendering Projectors and Flat Panel Displays,” New Initiatives in Motion Imaging, SMPTE Advanced Motion Imaging Conference, Feb. 27-Mar. 1, 2003, Seattle, Washington, pp. 1-4.
  • Elliott, Candice H. Brown et al., “Co-optimization of Color AMLCD Subpixel Architecture and Rendering Algorithms,” SID Symp. Digest, May 2002, pp. 172-175.
  • Feigenblatt, R.I., “Full-color imaging on amplitude-quantized color mosaic displays,” SPIE, vol. 1075, Digital Image Processing Applications, 1989, pp. 199-204.
  • Johnston, Stuart J., “An Easy Read: Microsoft's ClearType,” InformationWeek Online, Redmond, WA, Nov. 23, 1998, 3 pages.
  • Johnston, Stuart J., “Clarifying ClearType,” InformationWeek Online, Redmond, WA, Jan. 4, 1999, 4 pages.
  • “Just Outta Beta,” Wired Magazine, Dec. 1999, Issue 7.12, 3 pages.
  • Klompenhouwer, Michiel A. et al., “Subpixel Image Scaling for Color Matrix Displays,” SID Symp. Digest, May 2002, pp. 176-179.
  • Markoff, John, “Microsoft's Cleartype Sets Off Debate on Originality,” The New York Times, Dec. 7, 1998, 5 pages.
  • “Microsoft ClearType,” http://www.microsoft.com/opentype/cleartype, Sep. 26, 2002, 4 pages.
  • Platt, John C., “Optimal Filtering for Patterned Displays,” Microsoft Research, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2000, 4 pages.
  • Platt, John, “Technical Overview of ClearType Filtering,” Microsoft Research, http://research.microsoft.com/users/jplatt/cleartype/default.aspx, Sep. 17, 2002, 3 pages.
  • Poor, Alfred, “LCDs: The 800-pound Gorilla,” Information Display, Sep. 2002, pp. 18-21.
  • “Ron Feigenblatt's remarks on Microsoft ClearType™,” http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Ridge/6664/ClearType.html, Dec. 5, 1998, Dec. 7, 1998, Dec. 12, 1999, Dec. 26, 1999, Dec. 30, 1999, and Jun. 19, 2000, 30 pages.
  • “Sub-Pixel Font Rendering Technology,” © 2003 Gibson Research Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, 2 pages.
  • Werner, Ken, “OLEDs, OLEDs, Everywhere . . . ,” Information Display, Sep. 2002, pp. 12-15.
Patent History
Patent number: 6950115
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 14, 2001
Date of Patent: Sep 27, 2005
Patent Publication Number: 20040046714
Assignee: Clairvoyante, Inc. (Sebastopol, CA)
Inventor: Candice Hellen Brown Elliott (Vallejo, CA)
Primary Examiner: Lao Lun-yi
Application Number: 10/024,326