Integrating digital watermarks in multimedia content
A method for decoding auxiliary data from media signals in multimedia content decodes watermarks from different media signals and uses the watermarks to control processing of the multimedia content. A copy control method decodes a watermark from one of the media signals in multimedia content, and uses the watermark to control processing of the multimedia content. Another method uses a watermark decoded from a first media signal to decode a second media signal. Yet another method uses a watermark decoded from a media signal to decode metadata associated with the media signal. Finally, another method forms a key for decoding data from at least first and second watermarks extracted from first and second media signals.
Latest Digimarc Corporation Patents:
RELATED APPLICATION DATA
This patent application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/525,865, filed Mar. 15, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,661,607, which claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application 60/180,364, filed Feb. 4, 2000. Application Ser. No. 09/525,865 is also a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/503,881, filed Feb. 14, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,614,914, and application Ser. No. 09/186,962, filed Nov. 5, 1998, which is a continuation of application Ser No. 08/649,419, filed May 16, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,260. Application Ser. No. 08/649,419 is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/508,083, filed Jul. 27, 1995 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,978) and application Ser. No. 08/436,098 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,636,292), filed May 8, 1995, which is a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 08/327,426, filed Oct. 21, 1994 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,768,426), application Ser. No. 08/215,289, filed Mar. 17, 1994 (now abandoned), and application Ser. No. 08/154,866, filed Nov. 18, 1993 (now abandoned).
The invention relates to digital watermarking, and more specifically relates to applications of digital watermarks in multimedia data.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
Digital watermarking is a process for modifying media content to embed a machine-readable code into the data content. The data may be modified such that the embedded code is imperceptible or nearly imperceptible to the user, yet may be detected through an automated detection process. Most commonly, digital watermarking is applied to media such as images, audio signals, and video signals. However, it may also be applied to other types of data, including documents (e.g., through line, word or character shifting), software, multi-dimensional graphics models, and surface textures of objects.
Digital watermarking systems have two primary components: an embedding component that embeds the watermark in the media content, and a reading component that detects and reads the embedded watermark. The embedding component embeds a watermark pattern by altering data samples of the media content in the spatial or frequency domains. The reading component analyzes target content to detect whether a watermark pattern is present. In applications where the watermark encodes information, the reader extracts this information from the detected watermark.
Recently, digital watermarks have been used in applications for encoding auxiliary data in video, audio and still images. Despite the pervasiveness of multimedia content, such applications generally focus on ways to embed and detect watermarks in a single media type.
One aspect of the invention is a method for decoding auxiliary data in multimedia content with two or more media signals of different media types. This method decodes watermarks in the media signals, uses the watermarks from the different media signals to control processing of the multimedia content. There are many applications of this method. One application is to use the watermark in one media signal to locate the watermark in another media signal. This is applicable to movies where a watermark in one media signal, such as the audio or video track, is used to locate the watermark in another media signal.
The watermark messages from different media signals may be combined for a variety of applications. One such application is to control processing of the multimedia signal. For example, the combined message can be used to control playback, copying or recording of the multimedia content.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for copy control of multimedia content where a watermark from one media signal is used to control processing of the multimedia content. An audio watermark may be used to control processing of the video signal in a movie, or a video watermark may be used to control processing of the audio signal in the movie.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for watermark decoding where a watermark decoded from a first media signal of a first media type is used to decoding a second media signal. The first and second media signals may be of the same or different types. Also, they may be part of the same composite media signal, such as an audio or video sequence. The term, “composite,” refers to a collection of media signals, which may be temporal portions (e.g., time frames in audio or video), or spatial portions (e.g., blocks of pixels in an image or video frame) of a visual, audio, or audio visual work. As an example, the first media signal may be an audio or video frame (or frames) in an audio or video sequence and the second media signal may be subsequent frames in the same sequence.
This method may be used in a variety of applications. The watermark in the first media signal may be used to de-scramble, decrypt, or decompress the second media signal. In addition, the watermark in the first media signal may be used to decode a different watermark from the second signal.
Another aspect of the invention is a method that uses a watermark decoded from a first media signal of a first media type to decode metadata associated with the first media signal. The watermark may be used to locate the metadata, which may be hidden for security purposes. The metadata located from the watermark may be located on the same storage medium that includes the first media signal. For example, the metadata may be located on portable storage device, such as flash memory, a magnetic memory device (e.g., tape or disk), or an optical memory device (e.g., CD, DVD, minidisk, etc.). The metadata may be located in a file header or some other place (e.g., encoded in the disk wobble).
There are a variety of applications of the watermark in this context. It may carry a key to decrypt, decompress, descramble, or locate the metadata. The metadata, in turn, may be used to control processing of the media signal in a computer or consumer electronic device. For example, it may be used to control usage rights, playback, recording, copying, transfer, etc.
Yet another aspect of the invention is a method that decodes first and second watermarks and forms a key for decoding data from the first and second watermarks. The watermarks may be decoded from the same or different media signals. For example, the watermarks may be decoded from media signals from the same composite signal. They may be derived from different types of media signals, such as the audio and video tracks of a movie. Alternatively, they may be derived from different parts of the same type of media signal, such as an audio sequence, video sequence, or image. The watermarks may be extracted from a signal or signals stored in a storage device, such as a portable storage device (e.g., optical or magnetic disk or tape, flash memory, etc.).
The key formed from the watermarks may be used for a variety of applications. It may be used as a watermark key to decode a watermark from a media signal. It may be used as a decryption or de-scrambling key. Also, it may be used as a decompression key (e.g., a parameter used to decompress a media signal).
Further features of the invention will become apparent with reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The following sections describe applications for integrating watermarks in multimedia data. In general, these applications exploit some level of interaction between watermarks and/or metadata associated with two or more different media types. The types of media supported in a given implementation vary with the application, and may include, for example, audio (e.g., speech, music, etc.), video, images, graphical models, etc.
The initial sections describe ways to integrate watermark embedder and detector systems in multimedia data. These techniques may be applied to many different applications, including, for example, copy protection, content authentication, binding media content with external data or machine instructions, etc.
Later sections discuss specific application scenarios.
2.0 Integration of Watermarks and Metadata of Different Data Types
2.1 Defining Multimedia
The term, multimedia, as used in this document, refers to any data that has a collection of two or more different media types. One example is a movie, which has an audio and video track. Other examples include multimedia collections that are packaged together on a storage device, such as optical or magnetic storage device. For example, media signals such as still images, music, graphical models and videos may be packaged on a portable storage device such as CD, DVD, tape, or flash memory card. Different media signals may be played back concurrently, such as the video and audio tracks of a movie, or may be played independently.
2.2 Levels of Integration of Watermark Systems
The extent of integration of watermark systems for different media types ranges from a low level of integration, where watermark decoders operate independently on different media types, to a high level of integration, where the decoders functionally interact. At a low level of integration, the watermark systems for different media types operate on their respective media types independently, yet there is some relationship between the auxiliary data embedded in each type. At a high level of integration, components of the watermark detectors and readers share information and assist each other to perform their respective functions.
In the encoder system shown in
There are a variety of ways to integrate the encoder functions. One way is to use a unified key that controls how a given message or set of messages are encoded and located within the respective media types. Another way is to insert a common message component in two or more different media types. Yet another way is to make a message inserted in one media type dependent on the content of one or more other media types. For example, attributes of an image may be extracted from the image and encoded into an audio track, and similarly, attributes of an audio track may be extracted and encoded in an image. Finally, the message in one media type may be used to control the processing of another media type. For example, copy control flags in a movie's audio track may be used to control copying of the movie's video track or the movie; and, copy control flags in the video track may be used to control copying of the audio track or the movie.
The following sub-sections describe various scenarios for integrating watermarks in different media types from the perspective of the decoder.
2.2.1 Auxiliary Data Embedded in Different Media Types
Watermark decoders for each media type operate on their respective media data. In extracting the watermark from the signal domain in which the embedder inserted it, the decoder functions compliment the embedder functions. In many applications, the media types may be coded in a standard or proprietary format. In the example of a movie, both the audio and video tracks are typically compressed (e.g., using some lossy transform domain compression codec like MPEG). The watermark decoders may operate on compressed, partially compressed or uncompressed data. For example, the decoders may operate on frequency coefficients in the compressed image, video or audio data. As shown in
In the low level integration scenario of
In many applications, it may be useful to insert a link in one media type to content of another media type within the multimedia data. For example, one might want to link a still image or a video texture to a graphical model. Then, a graphics rendering application may use the link to determine which image (or video) to map to the surface of a graphical model. As another example, one might link an audio clip to an image, graphical model or other media object. When instructed to render the image, model or other media object, the rendering application then uses the link to also initiate playback of the linked audio clip, and optionally, to synchronize playback of the linking media signal with the signal linked by the watermark. For example, the video watermark could specify which audio clip to play and when to initiate playback of parts of the audio clip. Stated more generally, the embedded link from one media type to another may be used by the rendering application to control the relationship between the linked media objects during playback and to control the playback process.
The media signals within multimedia content can be linked together through watermarks and embedded with control information and metadata that is used to control playback. The entire script for controlling playback of a multimedia file or collection may be embedded in watermarks in the media signals. For example, a user could initiate playback by clicking on an image from the multimedia content. In response, the rendering application extracts control instructions, links, and/or metadata to determine how to playback video, audio, animation and other media signals in the multimedia content. The rendering application can execute a script embedded in a watermark or linked via a reference in the watermark (e.g., a watermark message includes a pointer to, or an index or address of a script program stored elsewhere). The watermark message may also specify the order of playback, either by including a script, or linking to a script that contains this ordering. Several media signals may be tied together in a playback sequence via a linked list structure where watermarks embedded in the media signals reference the next media signal to be played back (as well as media signals to be played back concurrently). Each media signal may link to another one by providing a media signal identifier in the watermark message, such as an address, pointer, index, name of media title, etc.
As the rendering application plays back multimedia content, it can also display metadata about the media signals (e.g., the content owner, a description of the content, time and location of creation, etc.). The watermark messages embedded in the media signals can either include this metadata or link to it. In addition, the watermark messages may include instructions (or a link to instructions) for indicating how and when to display metadata. The metadata need not be in text form. For example, metadata may be in the form of speech output (via a text to speech synthesis system), a pre-recorded audio clip, video clip, or animation.
To embed a variety of different information, instructions and links into the media signals within multimedia content, the embedder can locate watermark messages in different temporal portions (e.g., time multiplex different messages) of a time varying signal like audio or video. Similarly, the embedder can locate different watermark messages in different spatial portions of images, graphical models, or video frames. Finally, the embedder can locate different watermark messages in different transform domains (e.g., Discrete Fourier Transform, Discrete Cosine Transform, Wavelet transform, etc.) of image or audio signals.
The following sub-sections describe additional application scenarios.
188.8.131.52 Copy Protection
In a copy protection application, the messages embedded in each media type convey information to the application specifying how it may use the content. For example, each message may provide copy control flags specifying “copy once”, “copy no more”, “copy freely”, and “copy never.” These flags indicate whether the application may copy the media type or the multimedia content as a whole, and if so, how many times it may copy the pertinent content.
The application collects the copy control flags from the different media types and determines the extent to which it may copy the content or selected media types within it.
184.108.40.206 Ownership Management
In multimedia content, each media type may be owned by different entities. The messages embedded in the content may contain an owner identifier or link to an owner. An ownership management application can then collect the ownership information, either from each of the messages in each media type, or by requesting this information by following the link to the owner. For example, the link may be associated with an external database that provides this information. The application may use the link to query a local database for the information. Alternatively, the application may use the link to query a remote database via a wire, wireless, or combination of wire and wireless connections to a remote database on a communication network (e.g., the Internet). One or more intermediate processing stages may be invoked to convert the link into a query to the remote database. For example, the link may be a unique number, index or address that cross-references the URL of a database server on the Internet.
220.127.116.11 Media Authentication
An authentication application may use watermark messages and/or metadata to authenticate media signals within the multimedia content. One or more of the media signals in multimedia content may be tampered with. Multimedia content poses an additional problem because media signals may be swapped into the content in place of the original signals. For example, in a video used as evidence, one might swap in a fake audio clip or remove a portion of the audio track. One way to authenticate the media signals is to extract features from them, hash the features, and insert the hashed features into the watermark messages of one or more of the media signals at encoding time.
To verify authenticity, the application at the decoder side repeats the process of extracting the features from the received media types (e.g., 44, 46), hashing these features, and then comparing the new hash with the hash extracted from the watermark message or messages. The objective of the hash is to create a content dependent parameter that may be inserted into a watermark message, or in some cases, in metadata associated with a media signal. The hash is not necessary if the size of the extracted features is such that they fit within a message.
Examples of features in images include the location of identifiable objects (such as the location of eyes and noses of human subjects), the shape of objects (e.g., a binary mask or chain code of an object in an image), the inertia of an image, a low pass filtering of an image, the Most Significant Bit of every pixel in a selected color plane (luminance, chrominance, Red, Green, Blue, etc.).
Examples of features in audio include the temporal location of certain aural attributes (e.g., a transition from quiet to high intensity, sharp transitions in spectral energy, etc.), a low pass filter of an audio clip, etc.
Features from one media type may be inserted into a watermark or the metadata of another media type. Alternatively, they may be combined and inserted in one or more of the media types in a watermark embedded in a watermark of the media signal or its metadata.
An additional level of security may be added using public key encryption techniques to create a digital signature that identifies the source of the multimedia content. Some examples of public key cryptography include RSA, DES, IDEA (International Data Encryption Algorithm), skipjack, discrete log systems (e.g., El Gamal Cipher), elliptic curve systems, cellular automata, etc. Public key cryptography systems employ a private and public key. The private key is kept secret, and the public key is distributed to users. To digitally sign a message, the originator of the message encrypts the message with his private key. The private key is uniquely associated with the originator. Those users having a public key verify that the message has originated from the holder of the private key by using the public key to decrypt the message.
2.2.2 Integrating Watermark Detection Processes
Another way to integrate processing of media types is to integrate watermark detectors for different media types. One function of some watermark detectors is to determine the orientation and strength of a watermark within a host media signal. The orientation may provide the watermark location, and possibly other orientation parameters like warp (e.g., an affine or non-linear warp, temporal and/or spatial), scale, rotation, shear, etc. As the media content is subjected to various transformations, the watermark orientation and strength may change. Watermark detectors use attributes of the watermark signal to identify its location and orientation within a host signal. In multimedia content where different media signals are watermarked, detectors for the respective media signals can assist each other by sharing information about the orientation and/or strength of a watermark in the media signals. While the watermarks in different media types may be transformed in different ways, the orientation information found in one media signal might help locate a watermark in a different media signal.
In applications where the watermark carries a message, each detector may invoke a watermark reader 78, 80 to extract a message from the watermark. In some cases, the reader uses the orientation to locate and read the watermark. The strength of the watermark signal may also be used to give signal samples more or less weight in message decoding. Preferably, each reader should be able to read a watermark message 82, 84 from a media signal without requiring the original, un-watermarked media signal.
One example of integrated detection is a scheme where watermark detectors operate on respective media types concurrently and share orientation parameters. To illustrate the scheme, consider the example of a movie that has a watermarked audio and video track. While video and audio are distinct media signals in the content delivery and storage formats, the video and audio tracks are carefully synchronized so that the audio closely tracks the movement of actors' mouths and other motion depicted in the video. The embedding scheme places audio watermarks within a specified temporal range of the video watermarks. Because the video and audio tracks need to be temporally synchronized to avoid noticeable artifacts during playback, the temporal locations of the audio and video watermarks are likely to remain within a predictable temporal distance in their respective host signals. As such, the watermark detectors can take advantage of the temporal relationship of the watermarks in different media types to facilitate detection.
The location of a watermark detected in one media signal can provide information about the location of a watermark yet to be detected in another media signal. For example, when the video watermark detector finds a watermark in a video frame (e.g., an I frame in MPEG video), it signals the other detector, passing information about the temporal location of the video watermark. Leveraging the temporal relationship between the video and audio watermarks, the audio watermark detector confines its search for an audio watermark to a specified temporal range in the audio signal relative to the location of the corresponding video watermark in the video signal.
In this scenario, the audio watermark detector may provide similar information to the video watermark detector to help it identify the frame or sequence of frames to be analyzed for a video watermark.
Another example is a scheme where one watermark detector operates on a media type, and then passes orientation parameters to a detector of another media type. This scheme reduces the complexity of the second detector because it uses the orientation parameters extracted from a first media type to assist computation of the orientation in another media type. Applying this scheme to the previous example of a movie, the watermark decoder method reduces the complexity of the audio detector by confining its search to a specified range defined relative to the location of a video watermark. This is a simpler case than the previous example in the sense that the orientation information flows solely from a first detector to a second one. The second detector searches in a confined space around the location specified by the other detector, and does not have to pass orientation information to the other detector.
18.104.22.168 Applications of Integrated Watermark Detectors
As in the previous sections, there are a variety of applications for watermark systems with integrated detectors. The watermarks may be used to encode data or links to external data or other media signals within the multimedia content.
The watermarks may also be used to encode authentication information. In the movie example, the watermarks in one media type can reference one or more watermarks in another media type. For example, if an audio detector does not find an audio watermark designated by the video watermark to be in a specified range within the audio signal, then it can mark that specified range as being corrupted. Similarly, the video detector can authenticate video frames based on presence or absence of video watermarks designated by audio watermarks.
In copy control applications for mixed media like movies, integrated detectors can be used to locate audio and video watermarks carrying copy control flags. If the audio or the video tracks have been tampered with or transformed in a way that removes or degrades the watermarks, then a copy control application can take the appropriate action in response to detecting the absence of a watermark or a degraded watermark. The actions triggered in response may include, for example, preventing copying, recording, playback, etc.
2.2.4 Integrating Watermark Message Reading of Different Media Types
Then, a message decoder 114 attempts to decode the pooled message data. The message decoder may perform various error correction decoding operations, such as Reed Solomon, BCH, Turbo, Convolution operations. In cases where the watermark embedder uses spread spectrum modulation to spread raw message bits in the host media signal into chips, the message decoder may perform the inverse of a spread spectrum modulation function to convert spread spectrum chip values back to raw message values.
The result of the decoding operations provides information about the media signals. Depending on the application and implementation, the decoded message 116 can be interpreted in different ways. For example, in some cases, to generate a valid decoded message (as indicated by an error detection process such as a CRC or parity check), watermark message data from each media signal must be valid. In other cases, the decoded message may specify which media signals have valid messages, and which do not.
Like the other scenarios described above, the scheme for integrating watermark readers of different media types can be applied to many applications, including data embedding and linking, content authentication, broadcast monitoring, copy control, etc. This scheme is particularly suited for content authentication and copy control because it can be used to indicate content tampering and to disable various operations, such as copying, playback, recording, etc. For example, it can be used in a copy control scheme for content with audio and video tracks. Each track contains watermark messages that must be detected and converted to the raw message data 112 before the decoder 114 can decode a valid message. Thus, valid copy control information in both the video and audio tracks must be present before a valid copy control message 116 will be produced. A player can then process the multimedia content based on the control information in the valid copy control message. Alternatively, the content can be prevented from being passed into a player or other application or device if a valid control message is not generated.
2.2.5 Using Watermark Messages to Store Keys to other Watermarks or Metadata
The watermark message in one media signal may be used to specify a key of a watermark in another media signal. In this scenario, the watermark reader for one media type supplies the watermark decoder for another media type with the key. This key may specify the location of the watermark as well as information about how to extract the watermark from another media signal, and information to decode or decrypt the watermark message.
The watermark message in a media signal may also specify a key to access other metadata on the storage device of the media signal. For example, the message may specify a key to decrypt or decode metadata on the storage device, such as metadata in a header file or encoded within tracks of a CD or DVD (e.g., encoded within the disk wobble). The key may also specify the location of the associated metadata.
The scheme described in the previous section may be used in many applications, including those discussed previously. This scheme is particularly suited for content authentication and copy protection. In order to authenticate the content, each of the media signals in multimedia content need to have valid watermarks. The watermark in one media signal cannot be located without extracting a key from a watermark in another media signal.
In copy protection applications, the decoding system would need to find the watermarks in each of the media signals before enabling certain actions (e.g., playback, recording, copying, etc.).
2.3 Using Watermark Data in One Media Type to Control Playback of Another Media Type
For some applications, it is not necessary that each media signal in multimedia content have a watermark. For example, a watermark in one media signal could provide the desired functionality for the entire content, or for selected portions of the content. For example, in copy protection applications for movies, a watermark in the audio track could be used to encode copy control flags to control copying, playback, or recording of audio and/or video tracks.
2.4 Using Watermark Data in Conjunction with other Data or Applications
The watermark message data can be used in conjunction with other data or applications to control processing of the multimedia or single media content. Using any of the scenarios above, for example, a decoder can extract a message that is used to control further media processing.
One example is where the watermark message is used as a necessary key for decoding or decrypting the media content. For example, the watermark message may contain necessary bits for decompressing (e.g., MPEG decoding) of the media signal or signals within the content (audio, video or both). Examples of necessary bits are CRC bits that are required to reconstruct coded video or audio data. This technique is particularly useful when the message is derived from watermark messages embedded in different media signals. In a movie copy control application, for instance, the decoder would have to generate a valid message based on decoding the raw message information from audio and video watermark messages before allowing playback, recording, etc. In this case, the embedder would spread the necessary control information into watermark messages inserted in the audio and video tracks. For example, watermark messages in audio or video frames include decompression parameters or descrambling keys to decompress or descramble subsequent audio or video frames.
The same approach can be implemented by embedding other forms of control data in one or more watermark messages in different media signals. Another example is a decryption key that is necessary to decrypt other media signals within the content, or other portions of the same media signal. Watermark messages in audio or video frames may include decryption keys to decrypt subsequent frames. One watermark message may include a key, or a portion of a key, needed to decrypt or unscramble other signal portions or other watermark messages. In the case where the watermark message includes only a portion of a key (e.g., one parameter in a key comprising two or more parameters), the other portion may be constructed by extracting another component of the key from another watermark message (in the same or different media signals) or from other metadata (e.g., in the disk wobble, the header file of MPEG content, etc.).
Another form of control data is region data that indicates that a particular media signal may only be played when the region data of the media signal and the player match. A similar region data scheme is understood to be implemented in the Content Scrambling System currently used for DVDs. The region data can be embedded in one or more watermarks in the same or different media signals. By placing this information in different media signals, the decoder must be able to extract consistent region data from watermarks in each of the media signals as a pre-requisite to further use of the content. Then, assuming all of the region data creates a valid region data message, then the copy control application would control playback based on whether the region data decoded from the watermarks (and/or metadata of the different media signals) matches the region data of the player.
3.0 Implementation of Watermark Encoders and Decoders
The state of watermark encoders and decoders for audio, video and still images is quite advanced. Some examples of watermark systems for multimedia data include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,862,260, 5,930,369, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/503,881. Examples of watermark systems targeted to audio signals include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,945,932, 5,940,135, 6,005,501, and 5,828,325. Other watermark systems are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,940,429, 5,613,004, 5,889,868, WO 99/45707, WO 99/45706, WO 99/45705, and WO 98/54897.
Examples of watermark systems used in copy control are: WO 00/04688, WO 00/04712, WO 00/04727, and WO 99/65240. These documents include examples where a copy protection scheme uses watermark data and metadata to control processing of a media signal.
Watermark systems that operate on compressed content include: U.S. Pat. No. 5,687,191; and WO 00/04722.
These watermark systems may be used to implement the scenarios described above.
3.1 Location of the Watermark Decoder
The watermark decoder may be implemented in one or more components. The location of these components varies depending on the application. For multimedia content on portable memory devices like DVDs or CDs, the decoder may be implemented in the drive hardware or in an interface to the drive hardware. Alternatively, the decoder may be located in an application program or device. One example is a media codec, like an MPEG decoder. If the media signals are compressed, the detector may have to implement at least portions of the codec. For example, if the watermark is coded in frequency coefficients in MPEG video and audio, the decoder system may include an MPEG parser and dequantizer to identify the media signals (audio and video signals) and extract the coefficients from each of the media signals. Placing the watermark decoder in the media codec, such as the MPEG codec, saves resources because many of the resources used for decoding the media signals may also be used for detecting and reading the watermarks.
3.2 Operating Environment
The computer system shown in
The system bus may comprise any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using a bus architecture such as PCI, VESA, Microchannel (MCA), ISA and EISA, to name a few.
The system memory includes read only memory (ROM) 1224 and random access memory (RAM) 1225. A basic input/output system 1226 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer 1220, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 1224.
The computer 1220 further includes a hard disk drive 1227, a magnetic disk drive 1228, e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk 1229, and an optical disk drive 1230, e.g., for reading a CD-ROM or DVD disk 1231 or to read from or write to other optical media. The hard disk drive 1227, magnetic disk drive 1228, and optical disk drive 1230 are connected to the system bus 1223 by a hard disk drive interface 1232, a magnetic disk drive interface 1233, and an optical drive interface 1234, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions (program code such as dynamic link libraries, and executable files), etc. for the computer 1220.
Although the description of computer-readable media above refers to a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk and an optical disk, it can also include other types of media that are readable by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, and the like.
A number of program modules may be stored in the drives and RAM 1225, including an operating system 1235, one or more application programs 1236, other program modules 1237, and program data 1238.
A user may enter commands and information into the personal computer 1220 through a keyboard 1240 and pointing device, such as a mouse 1242. Other input devices may include a microphone, sound card, radio or television tuner, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, digital camera, scanner, or the like. A digital camera or scanner 43 may be used to capture the target image for the detection process described above. The camera and scanner are each connected to the computer via a standard interface 44. Currently, there are digital cameras designed to interface with a Universal Serial Bus (USB), Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), and parallel port interface. Two emerging standard peripheral interfaces for cameras include USB2 and 1394 (also known as firewire and iLink).
In addition to a camera or scanner, watermarked images or video may be provided from other sources, such as a packaged media devices (e.g., CD, DVD, flash memory, etc), streaming media from a network connection, television tuner, etc. Similarly, watermarked audio may be provided from packaged devices, streaming media, radio tuner, etc.
These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 1221 through a port interface 1246 that is coupled to the system bus, either directly or indirectly. Examples of such interfaces include a serial port, parallel port, game port or universal serial bus (USB).
A monitor 1247 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 1223 via an interface, such as a video adapter 1248. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers.
The computer 1220 operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 1249. The remote computer 1249 may be a server, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 1220, although only a memory storage device 1250 has been illustrated in FIG. 5. The logical connections depicted in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 1220 is connected to the local network 1251 through a network interface or adapter 1253. When used in a WAN networking environment, the personal computer 1220 typically includes a modem 1254 or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 1252, such as the Internet. The modem 1254, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 1223 via the serial port interface 1246.
In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 1220, or portions of them, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. The processes detailed above can be implemented in a distributed fashion, and as parallel processes. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and that other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
4.0 Relationship with other Applications of Metadata
Watermarks can facilitate and cooperate with other applications that employ metadata of multimedia objects. As demonstrated above, this is particularly true in copy protection/control applications where the copy control information in the watermark and the metadata are used to control playback. The watermark message and metadata (in the MPEG file header or encoded in the disk wobble) can form components in a unified key that is a necessary prerequisite to playback or some other use of the content.
The watermarks in the media signals can each act as persistent links to metadata stored elsewhere, such as a metadata database server on the Internet or some other wire or wireless network. Applications for viewing and playing content can display metadata by extracting the link and querying a metadata database server to return the metadata (e.g., owner name, content description, sound or video annotation, etc.). The watermark decoder or an application program in communication with it can issue the query over the Internet using standard communication protocols like TCP/IP, database standards like ODBC, and metadata standards like XML. The query may be sent to a metadata router that maps the link to a metadata database server, which in turn, returns the metadata to the viewing application for display or playback to the user.
5.0 Concluding Remarks
The watermarking technology detailed herein can be employed in numerous diverse applications. See, e.g., the applications for watermarking detailed in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,260, and copending application Ser. Nos. 09/292,569, 60/134,782, 09/343,104, 09/473,396, 09/476,686, and 60/141,763.
Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention with reference to several specific embodiments, it will be recognized that the principles thereof can be implemented in other, different, forms.
To provide a comprehensive disclosure without unduly lengthening the specification, applicant incorporates by reference any patents and patent applications referenced above.
The particular combinations of elements and features in the above-detailed embodiments are exemplary only; the interchanging and substitution of these teachings with other teachings in this and the incorporated-by-reference patents/applications are also contemplated.
In view of the wide variety of embodiments to which the principles of the invention can be applied, it should be recognized that the detailed embodiment is illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, we claim as our invention all such embodiments as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims, and equivalents thereto.
1. A method for decoding auxiliary data in audio visual content with an audio and video track, comprising:
- decoding digital watermarks in the audio and video tracks;
- combining watermark messages from the audio and video tracks; and
- using the combined messages to control processing of the audio visual content.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the combined messages are used to control playback, copying or recording of the audio visual content.
3. A tangible medium on which is stored instructions for performing the method of claim 1.
4. A method for digital watermark decoding for audio visual content including an audio and video track, the method comprising:
- decoding a first watermark from a first track of the audio visual content, the first track being the audio or video track;
- and decoding a second media signal from a second track using the digital watermark from the first track, the second track being the audio or video track not including the first watermark.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein decoding the second media signal comprises decompressing the second media signal using the first watermark.
6. The method of claim 4 wherein the decoding comprises de-scrambling or decrypting the second media signal using the first watermark.
7. The method of claim 4 wherein the decoding comprises using information from the first watermark as a watermark key for decoding a different watermark from the second media signal.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the watermark key specifies a location of the different watermark in the second media signal.
9. A tangible medium on which is stored instructions for performing the method of claim 4.
10. A method of digital watermark decoding from audio visual content having an audio and video track, the method comprising:
- decoding at least a first watermark from a first media signal in the audio visual content;
- decoding at least a second watermark from a second media signal in the audio visual content; and
- forming a key for decoding data from at least the first and second watermarks.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the first and second media signals are of the same media type.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein the first and second media signals are of different media types.
13. The method of claim 10 wherein the key comprises a watermark key used to decode a watermark from a media signal.
14. The method of claim 10 wherein the key comprises a decryption key used to decrypt a media signal.
15. The method of claim 10 wherein the key comprises a parameter used to decompress a media signal.
16. A tangible medium on which is stored instructions for performing the method of claim 10.
U.S. Patent Documents
|2630525||March 1953||Tomberlin et al.|
|3665162||May 1972||Yamamoto et al.|
|3703628||November 1972||Philipson, Jr.|
|3809806||May 1974||Walker et al.|
|3838444||September 1974||Louglin et al.|
|3922074||November 1975||Ikegami et al.|
|3971917||July 27, 1976||Maddox et al.|
|3982064||September 21, 1976||Barnaby|
|3984624||October 5, 1976||Waggener|
|4025851||May 24, 1977||Haselwood et al.|
|4225967||September 30, 1980||Miwa et al.|
|4230990||October 28, 1980||Lert, Jr. et al.|
|4231113||October 28, 1980||Blasbalg|
|4237484||December 2, 1980||Brown et al.|
|4238849||December 9, 1980||Gassmann|
|4252995||February 24, 1981||Schmidt et al.|
|4262329||April 14, 1981||Bright et al.|
|4313197||January 26, 1982||Maxemchuk|
|4333113||June 1, 1982||Kalinowski|
|4367488||January 4, 1983||Leventer et al.|
|4379947||April 12, 1983||Warner|
|4380027||April 12, 1983||Leventer et al.|
|4389671||June 21, 1983||Posner et al.|
|4395600||July 26, 1983||Lundy et al.|
|4423415||December 27, 1983||Goldman|
|4425642||January 10, 1984||Moses et al.|
|4425661||January 10, 1984||Moses et al.|
|4476468||October 9, 1984||Goldman|
|4495620||January 22, 1985||Steele et al.|
|4528588||July 9, 1985||Lofberg|
|4532508||July 30, 1985||Ruell|
|4547804||October 15, 1985||Greenberg|
|4553261||November 12, 1985||Froessl|
|4590366||May 20, 1986||Rothfjell|
|4595950||June 17, 1986||Lofberg|
|4637051||January 13, 1987||Clark|
|4639779||January 27, 1987||Greenberg|
|4644582||February 17, 1987||Morishita et al.|
|4647974||March 3, 1987||Butler et al.|
|4654867||March 31, 1987||Labedz et al.|
|4660221||April 21, 1987||Dlugos|
|4663518||May 5, 1987||Borror et al.|
|4665431||May 12, 1987||Cooper|
|4672605||June 9, 1987||Hustig et al.|
|4675746||June 23, 1987||Tetrick et al.|
|4677435||June 30, 1987||D'Aggraives et al.|
|4677466||June 30, 1987||Lert, Jr. et al.|
|4682794||July 28, 1987||Margolin|
|4697209||September 29, 1987||Kiewit et al.|
|4703476||October 27, 1987||Howard|
|4712103||December 8, 1987||Gotanda|
|4718106||January 5, 1988||Weinblatt|
|4739377||April 19, 1988||Allen|
|4750173||June 7, 1988||Bluthgen|
|4765656||August 23, 1988||Becker et al.|
|4775901||October 4, 1988||Nakano|
|4776013||October 4, 1988||Kafri et al.|
|4805020||February 14, 1989||Greenberg|
|4807031||February 21, 1989||Broughton et al.|
|4811357||March 7, 1989||Betts et al.|
|4811408||March 7, 1989||Goldman|
|4820912||April 11, 1989||Samyn|
|4835517||May 30, 1989||van der Gracht et al.|
|4855827||August 8, 1989||Best|
|4864618||September 5, 1989||Wright et al.|
|4866771||September 12, 1989||Bain|
|4874936||October 17, 1989||Chandler et al.|
|4876617||October 24, 1989||Best et al.|
|4879747||November 7, 1989||Leighton et al.|
|4884139||November 28, 1989||Pommier|
|4885632||December 5, 1989||Mabey et al.|
|4903301||February 20, 1990||Kondo et al.|
|4908836||March 13, 1990||Rushforth et al.|
|4908873||March 13, 1990||Philibert et al.|
|4920503||April 24, 1990||Cook|
|4921278||May 1, 1990||Shiang et al.|
|4939515||July 3, 1990||Adelson|
|4941150||July 10, 1990||Iwasaki|
|4943973||July 24, 1990||Werner|
|4943976||July 24, 1990||Ishigaki|
|4944036||July 24, 1990||Hyatt|
|4963998||October 16, 1990||Maufe|
|4965827||October 23, 1990||McDonald|
|4967273||October 30, 1990||Greenberg|
|4969041||November 6, 1990||O'Grady et al.|
|4972471||November 20, 1990||Gross et al.|
|4972476||November 20, 1990||Nathans|
|4977594||December 11, 1990||Shear|
|4979210||December 18, 1990||Nagata et al.|
|4993068||February 12, 1991||Piosenka|
|4996530||February 26, 1991||Hilton|
|5010405||April 23, 1991||Schreiber et al.|
|5027401||June 25, 1991||Soltesz|
|5036513||July 30, 1991||Greenblatt|
|5063446||November 5, 1991||Gibson|
|5073899||December 17, 1991||Collier et al.|
|5075773||December 24, 1991||Pullen et al.|
|5077608||December 31, 1991||Dubner|
|5077795||December 31, 1991||Rourke et al.|
|5079648||January 7, 1992||Maufe|
|5083224||January 21, 1992||Hoogendoorn et al.|
|5083310||January 21, 1992||Drory|
|5086469||February 4, 1992||Gupta et al.|
|5091966||February 25, 1992||Bloomberg et al.|
|5095196||March 10, 1992||Miyata|
|5103459||April 7, 1992||Gilhousen et al.|
|5113437||May 12, 1992||Best et al.|
|5128525||July 7, 1992||Stearns et al.|
|5134496||July 28, 1992||Schwab et al.|
|5144660||September 1, 1992||Rose|
|5146457||September 8, 1992||Veldhuis et al.|
|5148498||September 15, 1992||Resnikoff et al.|
|5150409||September 22, 1992||Elsner|
|5161210||November 3, 1992||Druyvesteyn et al.|
|5166676||November 24, 1992||Milheiser|
|5168147||December 1, 1992||Bloomberg|
|5181786||January 26, 1993||Hujink|
|5185736||February 9, 1993||Tyrrell et al.|
|5199081||March 30, 1993||Saito et al.|
|5200822||April 6, 1993||Bronfin et al.|
|5212551||May 18, 1993||Conanan|
|5213337||May 25, 1993||Sherman|
|5228056||July 13, 1993||Schilling|
|5243423||September 7, 1993||DeJean et al.|
|5245165||September 14, 1993||Zhang|
|5245329||September 14, 1993||Gokcebay|
|5247364||September 21, 1993||Banker et al.|
|5253078||October 12, 1993||Balkanski et al.|
|5257119||October 26, 1993||Funada et al.|
|5258998||November 2, 1993||Koide|
|5259025||November 2, 1993||Monroe et al.|
|5267334||November 30, 1993||Normille et al.|
|5278400||January 11, 1994||Appel|
|5280537||January 18, 1994||Sugiyama et al.|
|5293399||March 8, 1994||Hefti|
|5295203||March 15, 1994||Krause et al.|
|5299019||March 29, 1994||Pack et al.|
|5305400||April 19, 1994||Butera|
|5315098||May 24, 1994||Tow|
|5315448||May 24, 1994||Ryan|
|5319453||June 7, 1994||Copriviza et al.|
|5319724||June 7, 1994||Blonstein et al.|
|5319735||June 7, 1994||Preuss et al.|
|5325167||June 28, 1994||Melen|
|5327237||July 5, 1994||Gerdes et al.|
|5337361||August 9, 1994||Wang et al.|
|5337362||August 9, 1994||Gormish et al.|
|5349655||September 20, 1994||Mann|
|5351302||September 27, 1994||Leighton et al.|
|5374976||December 20, 1994||Spannenburg|
|5379345||January 3, 1995||Greenberg|
|5387941||February 7, 1995||Montgomery et al.|
|5396559||March 7, 1995||McGrew|
|5398283||March 14, 1995||Virga|
|5404160||April 4, 1995||Schober et al.|
|5404377||April 4, 1995||Moses|
|5408542||April 18, 1995||Callahan|
|5410598||April 25, 1995||Shear|
|5418853||May 23, 1995||Kanota et al.|
|5422963||June 6, 1995||Chen et al.|
|5422995||June 6, 1995||Aoki et al.|
|5425100||June 13, 1995||Thomas et al.|
|5428606||June 27, 1995||Moskowitz|
|5428607||June 27, 1995||Hiller et al.|
|5432542||July 11, 1995||Thibadeau et al.|
|5432870||July 11, 1995||Schwartz|
|5436653||July 25, 1995||Ellis et al.|
|5444779||August 22, 1995||Daniele|
|5446273||August 29, 1995||Leslie|
|5449895||September 12, 1995||Hecht et al.|
|5450122||September 12, 1995||Keene|
|5450490||September 12, 1995||Jensen et al.|
|5453968||September 26, 1995||Veldhuis et al.|
|5461426||October 24, 1995||Limberg et al.|
|5469506||November 21, 1995||Berson et al.|
|5473631||December 5, 1995||Moses|
|5479168||December 26, 1995||Johnson et al.|
|5481294||January 2, 1996||Thomas et al.|
|5488664||January 30, 1996||Shamir|
|5493677||February 20, 1996||Balogh et al.|
|5499294||March 12, 1996||Friedman|
|5500856||March 19, 1996||Nagase et al.|
|5510900||April 23, 1996||Shirochi et al.|
|5513011||April 30, 1996||Matsumoto et al.|
|5513260||April 30, 1996||Ryan|
|5515081||May 7, 1996||Vasilik|
|5521372||May 28, 1996||Hecht et al.|
|5524933||June 11, 1996||Kunt et al.|
|5526427||June 11, 1996||Thomas et al.|
|5530751||June 25, 1996||Morris|
|5530759||June 25, 1996||Braudaway et al.|
|5530852||June 25, 1996||Meske, Jr. et al.|
|5532920||July 2, 1996||Hartrick et al.|
|5537216||July 16, 1996||Yamashita et al.|
|5537223||July 16, 1996||Curry|
|5539471||July 23, 1996||Myhrvold et al.|
|5541662||July 30, 1996||Adams et al.|
|5541741||July 30, 1996||Suzuki|
|5544255||August 6, 1996||Smithies et al.|
|5548646||August 20, 1996||Aziz et al.|
|5557333||September 17, 1996||Jungo et al.|
|5559559||September 24, 1996||Jungo et al.|
|5568179||October 22, 1996||Diehl et al.|
|5568268||October 22, 1996||Tsuji et al.|
|5568570||October 22, 1996||Rabbani|
|5572010||November 5, 1996||Petrie|
|5572247||November 5, 1996||Montgomery et al.|
|5574787||November 12, 1996||Ryan|
|5576532||November 19, 1996||Hecht|
|5579124||November 26, 1996||Aijala et al.|
|5581800||December 3, 1996||Fardeau et al.|
|5582103||December 10, 1996||Tanaka et al.|
|5587743||December 24, 1996||Montgomery et al.|
|5590197||December 31, 1996||Chen et al.|
|5602920||February 11, 1997||Bestler et al.|
|5606609||February 25, 1997||Houser et al.|
|5611575||March 18, 1997||Petrie|
|5612943||March 18, 1997||Moses et al.|
|5613004||March 18, 1997||Cooperman et al.|
|5613012||March 18, 1997||Hoffman et al.|
|5614940||March 25, 1997||Cobbley et al.|
|5617148||April 1, 1997||Montgomery|
|5627655||May 6, 1997||Okamoto et al.|
|5629770||May 13, 1997||Brassil|
|5629980||May 13, 1997||Stefik et al.|
|5636292||June 3, 1997||Rhoads|
|5638443||June 10, 1997||Stefik et al.|
|5638446||June 10, 1997||Rubin|
|5646997||July 8, 1997||Barton|
|5647017||July 8, 1997||Smithies et al.|
|5649054||July 15, 1997||Oomen et al.|
|5652626||July 29, 1997||Kawakami et al.|
|5659613||August 19, 1997||Copeland et al.|
|5659726||August 19, 1997||Sandford, II et al.|
|5659732||August 19, 1997||Kirsch|
|5661574||August 26, 1997||Kawana|
|5663766||September 2, 1997||Sizer, II|
|5664018||September 2, 1997||Leighton|
|5666487||September 9, 1997||Goodman et al.|
|5671277||September 23, 1997||Ikenoue et al.|
|5680223||October 21, 1997||Cooper et al.|
|5687191||November 11, 1997||Lee et al.|
|5687236||November 11, 1997||Moskowitz et al.|
|5689587||November 18, 1997||Bender et al.|
|5689623||November 18, 1997||Pinard|
|5709932||January 20, 1998||Glez et al.|
|5712920||January 27, 1998||Spille|
|5719937||February 17, 1998||Warren et al.|
|5719984||February 17, 1998||Yamagata et al.|
|5721788||February 24, 1998||Powell et al.|
|5727092||March 10, 1998||Sandford, II et al.|
|5737025||April 7, 1998||Dougherty et al.|
|5737026||April 7, 1998||Lu et al.|
|5739864||April 14, 1998||Copeland|
|5745569||April 28, 1998||Moskowitz et al.|
|5761686||June 2, 1998||Bloomberg|
|5764763||June 9, 1998||Jensen et al.|
|5764770||June 9, 1998||Schipper et al.|
|5765152||June 9, 1998||Erickson|
|5774452||June 30, 1998||Wolosewicz|
|5778102||July 7, 1998||Sandford, II et al.|
|5799081||August 25, 1998||Kim et al.|
|5799082||August 25, 1998||Murphy et al.|
|5819289||October 6, 1998||Sanford, II et al.|
|5822360||October 13, 1998||Lee et al.|
|5822432||October 13, 1998||Moskowitz et al.|
|5826227||October 20, 1998||Jayant|
|5828325||October 27, 1998||Wolosewicz et al.|
|5835639||November 10, 1998||Honsinger et al.|
|5850249||December 15, 1998||Massetti et al.|
|5857038||January 5, 1999||Owada et al.|
|5859920||January 12, 1999||Daly et al.|
|5862218||January 19, 1999||Steinberg|
|5862260||January 19, 1999||Rhoads|
|5878010||March 2, 1999||Okamoto et al.|
|5889868||March 30, 1999||Moskowitz et al.|
|5893067||April 6, 1999||Bender et al.|
|5905505||May 18, 1999||Lesk|
|5905819||May 18, 1999||Daly|
|5907443||May 25, 1999||Hirata|
|5929920||July 27, 1999||Sizer, II|
|5930369||July 27, 1999||Cox et al.|
|5937000||August 10, 1999||Lee et al.|
|5940135||August 17, 1999||Petrovic et al.|
|5940429||August 17, 1999||Lam et al.|
|5943422||August 24, 1999||Van Wie et al.|
|5945932||August 31, 1999||Smith et al.|
|5960151||September 28, 1999||Takahashi|
|5970140||October 19, 1999||Sandford, II et al.|
|5982977||November 9, 1999||Naruse et al.|
|5987127||November 16, 1999||Ikenoue et al.|
|5987459||November 16, 1999||Swanson et al.|
|5991500||November 23, 1999||Kanota et al.|
|6000621||December 14, 1999||Hecht et al.|
|6031914||February 29, 2000||Tewfik et al.|
|6035177||March 7, 2000||Moses et al.|
|6044156||March 28, 2000||Honsinger et al.|
|6061793||May 9, 2000||Tewfik et al.|
|6078664||June 20, 2000||Moskowitz et al.|
|6086706||July 11, 2000||Brassil et al.|
|6151076||November 21, 2000||Hoffman et al.|
|6181802||January 30, 2001||Todd|
|6209094||March 27, 2001||Levine et al.|
|6211919||April 3, 2001||Zink et al.|
|6219634||April 17, 2001||Levine|
|6233347||May 15, 2001||Chen et al.|
|6233684||May 15, 2001||Stefik et al.|
|6266299||July 24, 2001||Oshima et al.|
|6282654||August 28, 2001||Ikeda et al.|
|6353672||March 5, 2002||Rhoads|
|6442285||August 27, 2002||Rhoads et al.|
|6611607||August 26, 2003||Davis et al.|
|20010032312||October 18, 2001||Runje et al.|
Foreign Patent Documents
|058 482||August 1982||EP|
|366 381||May 1990||EP|
|372 601||June 1990||EP|
|493 091||December 1990||EP|
|411 232||February 1991||EP|
|418 964||March 1991||EP|
|441 702||August 1991||EP|
|551 016||February 1994||EP|
|581 317||February 1994||EP|
|605 208||July 1994||EP|
|629 972||December 1994||EP|
|642 060||March 1995||EP|
|649 074||April 1995||EP|
|650 146||April 1995||EP|
|651 554||May 1995||EP|
|705 025||April 1996||EP|
|WO 97/33392||September 1997||WO|
|WO 98/53565||November 1998||WO|
|WO 00/00969||January 2000||WO|
|WO 00/22745||April 2000||WO|
|WO 02/03385||January 2002||WO|
- Cox et al., “Secure Spread Spectrum Watermarking for Images, Audio and Video”, Proc. IEEE Soutcon 96, Jun. 1996, pp. 243-246.
- Zhao, Jian, “A WWW Service to Embed and Prove Digital Copyright Watermarks”, Proc. of the European Conference on Multimedia, Services and Techniques, pp. 1-115, May 1996.
- Szepanski, Wofram, “Compatibility Problems in add-on Data Transmission for TV-Channels”, 2nd Symp and Tech Exh. on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Jun. 28, 1977, pp. 263-268.
- Proceedings. Technological Strategies for Protecting Intellectual Property in the Networked Multimedia Environment, vol. 1 Issue 1, Jan. 1994, pp. 1-265.
- Cox et al., Secure Spread Spectrum Watermarking for Images, Audio and Video. Proc. IEEE Southcon 96, Jun. 1996, pp. 243-246.
- Zhao, Jian, “A WWW Service to Embed and Prove Digital Copyright Watermarks”, Proc. of the European Conference on Multimedia, Sevices and Techniques, pp. 1-15, May 1996.
- Bender, et al., “Applications for Data Hiding,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 39, No. 384, 2000, pp. 547-568.
- Dittmann et al., “Content-Based Digital Signature for Motion Pictures Authentication and Content-Fragile Watermarking,” 1999 IEEE, pp. 209-213.
- Dittmann et al., “Media-Independent Watermarking Classification and the Need for Combining Digital Video and Audio Watermarking for Media Authentication,” 2000 IEEE, pp. 62-67.
- Ten Kate W.R., et al., “A New Surround-Stereo-Surround Coding Technique”, Phillips Research Laboratories, The Netherlands, May, 1992.
- Gerzon, et al., “A High-Rate Buried-Data Channel for Audio CD,” presented at the 94.sup.th convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Mar. 16-19, 1993.
- “Access Control and Copyright Protection for Images, Conditional Access and Copyright Protection Based on the Use of Trusted Third Parties,” 1995, 43 pages.
- “Access Control and Copyright Protection for Images, WorkPackage 8: Watermarking,” Jun. 30, 1995, 46 pages.
- “Access Control and Copyright Protection for Images, WorkPackage 3: Evaluation of Existing Systems,” Apr. 19, 1995, 68 pages.
- “Access Control and Copyright Protection for Images, WorkPackage 1: Access Control and Copyright Protection for Images Need Evaluation,” Jun. 1995, 21 pages.
- “Copyright Proctection for Digital Images, Digital Fingerprinting from FBI,” Highwater FBI brochure, 1995, 4 pages.
- “Cyphertech Systems: Introduces Digital Encoding Device to Prevent TV Piracy,” Hollywood Reporter, Oct. 20, 1993, p. 23.
- “Foiling Card Forgers With Magnetic Noise,”, Wall Street Journal, Feb. 8, 1994.
- Frequently Asked Questions About Digimarc Signature Technology, Aug. 1, 1995, http://www.digimarc.com, 9 pages.
- “High Water FBI Limited Presentation Image Copyright Protection Software,” FBI Ltd brochure, Jul., 1995, 17 pages.
- “Holographic signatures for digital images,” The Seybold Report on Desktop Publishing, Aug. 1995, one page.
- “NAB—Cyphertech Starts Anti-Piracy Broadcast Tests,” Newsbytes, New03230023, Mar. 23, 1994.
- “Steganography,” Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, Sep. 1995, pp. 212-213.
- “The Copyright Can of Worms Opened Up By The New Electronic Media,” Computergram Internations, pCGN07170006, Jul. 17, 1995, 3 pages total.
- “Watermarking & Digital Signature: Protect Your Work!” Published on Internet 1996, http://Itswww.epfl.ch/jordan/watermarking.html.
- “Access Control and Copyright Protection of Images, Conditional Access and Copyright Protection Based on the Use of Trusted Third Parties, ” 1995, 43 pages.
- Anderson, “Stretching the Limits of Steganography,” Information Hiding, First International Workshop Proc., May 30-Jun. 1, 1996, pp. 39-48.
- Arachelian, “White Noise Storm,” Apr. 11, 1994, Internet reference, 13 pages.
- Arazi, et al., “Intuition, Perception, and Secure Communications,” IEEE Transactionson Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 19, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 1989, pp. 1016-1020.
- Arthur, “Digital Fingerprints Protect Artwork,” New Scientist, Nov. 12, 1994, p. 24.
- Aura, “Invisible Communication,” Helskinki University of Technology, Digital Systems Laboratory, Nov. 5, 1995, 13 pages.
- Aura, “Practical Invisibility in Digital Communication,” Information Hiding, First Int. Workshop Proc. May 30-Jun. 1, 1996, pp. 265-278.
- Barlett, et al., “An Overview of HighWater FBI Technology,” Posted on Internet Mar. 22, 1996, 12 pages.
- Bender et al., “Techniques for Data Hiding,” Draft Preprint, Private Correspondence, dated Oct. 30, 1995, 45 pages.
- Bender et al., “Techniques for Data Hiding,” Masschusetts Institute of Technology, Media Laboratory, Draft Preprint, Apr. 13, 1995, 10 pages.
- Bender, Techniques for Data Hiding, Proc. SPIE, vol. 2420, Feb. 9, 1995, pp. 164-173.
- Boland et al., “Watermarking Digital Images for Copyright Protection,” Fifth International Conference on Image Processing and its Applications, Conference Date Jul. 4-6, 1995, Conf. Publ. No. 410, p. 326-330.
- Boneh, “Collusion-Secure Fingerprinting for Digital Data,” Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, 1995, 31 pages.
- Boney et al., “Digital Watermarks for Audio Signals,” Proceedings of Multimedia '96, 1996 IEEE, pp. 473-480.
- Bors et al., “Embedding Parametric Digital Signatures in Images,” EUSIPCO-96, Trieste, Italy, accepted for publication, Sep. 1996 (Published on internet Apr. 9, 1996, (http://poseidon.csd.auth.gr/papers/confers:1-ind.html)), 4 pages.
- Boucqueau et al., Equitable Conditional Access and Copyright Protection for Image Based on Trusted Third Parties, Teleservices & Multimedia Communications, 2nd Int. Cost 237 Workshop, Second International Cost 237 Workshop, Nov., 1995; published 1996, pp. 229-243.
- Brandt et al., “Representations that Uniquely Characterize Images Modulo Translation, Rotation, and Scaling,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 1001-1015.
- Brassil et al., Electronic Marking and Identification Techniques to Discourage Document Copying, Proceedings of INFOCOM '94 Conference on Computer, IEEE Commun. Soc Conference, Jun. 12-16, 1994, pp. 1278-1287.
- Brassil et al., “Hiding Information in Document Images,” Nov., 1995, 7 pages.
- Braudaway et al., “Protecting Publicly-Available Images with a Visible Image Watermark,” SPIE vol. 2659, Feb. 1, 1996, pp. 126-133.
- Brown, “S-Tools for Windows, Version 1.00; What is Steganography,” Internet reference, Mar. 6, 1994, 6 pages.
- Bruckstein, A.M.; Richardson, T.J., A holographic transform domain image watermarking method, Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing vol. 17, No. 3 p. 361-89, 1998. This paper includes an appendix containing an internal memo of Bell Labs, which according to the authors of the paper, was dated Sep. 1994.
- Bruyndonckx et al., Neural Network Post-Processing of Coded Images Using Perceptual Masking, 1994, 3 pages.
- Bruyndonckx et al., “Spatial Method for Copyright Labeling of Digital Images,” 1994, 6 pages.
- Burgett et al., “A Novel Method for Copyright Labeling Digitized Image Data,” requested by e-mail from author (unavailable/password protected on IGD WWW site); 12 pages.
- Caronni, “Assuring Ownership Rights for Digital Images,” Published in the Proceedings of ‘Reliable IT Systems,’ VIS '95, HH. Bruggerman and W. Gerhardt-Hackl (Ed.), Viewing Publishing Company, Germany, 1995, Jun. 14, 1994, 10 pages. (Originally published as an ETH (Zurich) Technical Report, “Ermitteln Unauthorisierter Verteiler von Maschinenlesbaren Daten,” Aug. 1993.
- Caruso, “Digital Commerce, 2 plans for watermarks, which can bind proof of authorship to electronic works.” New York Times, Aug. 7, 1995, one page.
- Castro et al., “Registration of Translated and Rotated Images Using Finite Fourier Transforms,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PAMI-9, No. 5, Sep. 1987, pp. 700-703.
- Cha et al., “A Solution to the On-Line Image Downgrading Problem,” Proc. 11.sup.th Annual Computer Security Applications Conf., Dec. 11, 1995, pp. 108-112.
- Cheong, “Internet Agent, Spiders, Wanderers, Brokers, and Bots,” New Publising, Indianapolis, IN, 1996, 413 pages.
- Choudhury, et al., “Copyright Protection for Electronic Publishing over Computer Networks,” IEEE Network Magazine, Jun. 1994, 18 pages.
- Chudy, “Handcuff Digital Thieves,” Byte Magazine, Apr., 1996, 4 pages.
- Clarke, “Invisible Code Tags Electronic Images,” Electronic Engineering Times, Jun. 12, 1995, n. 852, p. 42.
- Cox et al., “A Secure, Imperceptable Yet Perceptually Salient, Spread Spectrum Watermark for Multimedia,” IEEE, Southcon/96, Conference Record, pp. 192-197, 1996.
- Cox et al., “Secure Spread Spectrum Watermarking for Multimedia,” NEC Research Institute Technical Report, Dec. 5, 1995, 33 pages.
Filed: Aug 25, 2003
Date of Patent: Dec 13, 2005
Patent Publication Number: 20040037449
Assignee: Digimarc Corporation (Beaverton, OR)
Inventors: Bruce L. Davis (Lake Oswego, OR), Tony F. Rodriguez (Portland, OR), Geoffrey B. Rhoads (West Linn, OR)
Primary Examiner: Jose L. Couso
Attorney: Digimarc Corporation
Application Number: 10/648,105