Automatic control system for an electrosurgical generator

- Sherwood Services Ag

An automatic control system for an electrosurgical generator is herein disclosed. The automatic control system includes voltage and current sensing circuits, a processing circuit, an output determining circuit, and a control circuit. Samples of the voltage and current outputs are supplied to the processing circuit and the output determining circuit to generate an output signal. The output signal is compared to a reference signal to generate a feedback signal for controlling a drive circuit.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS:

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/515,816, filed Oct. 30, 2003.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to electrosurgery. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to an automatic control system for an electrosurgical generator.

2. Background of Related Art

Surgeons have tried to deal with energy application by adjusting the basic power level of the electrosurgical generator and using a hand or foot switch to control the power applied over time. Unfortunately, that technique often leads to unintended power delivery or undesired duration of power delivery to the surgical site. Surgeons also experience difficulty in repeatably and/or consistently desiccating tissue to the desired levels due to the user's reaction time and/or machine response time when manual or foot activated switches are used for manual control. In addition, during endoscopic procedures, visual and tactile feedback is diminished.

A circuit for automatically controlling the output of an electrosurgical generator is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,403 to Klicek, currently owned, and assigned to Sherwood Services AG, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,403 relates to an electrosurgical generator control, which is responsive to the tissue impedance between the active and return electrodes during desiccation.

A method for tone detection using the Goertzel algorithm is disclosed in an article entitled The Goertzel Algorithm by Kevin Banks (The Goertzel Algorithm by Kevin Banks, <http://www.embedded.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=9900772>, last visited on Jul. 24, 2003). The Banks' article relates to using a modified Goertzel algorithm for determining whether a tone of a specific frequency is present. The Goertzel algorithm calculates both the magnitude and the phase of signal at a specific frequency and is functionally equivalent to performing a Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) at a single frequency, but is much less computationally demanding. The DFT is a method for calculating the magnitude and phase of a band of frequencies of interest. An N-point DFT is computationally demanding, but will calculate the real and imaginary frequency terms for all the frequencies up to half the sampling rate of the signal.

According to Banks, using a modified Goertzel algorithm is preferable in applications requiring tone detection such as DTMF, call progress decoding, and frequency response measurements. However, the modified Goertzel algorithm proposed by Banks does not provide the real and imaginary frequency components of the sampled waveform. As a result, the modified Goertzel algorithm is unsuited for determining the phase of the waveform.

It is an object of the present disclosure to provide an automatic control system that uses fewer computational steps.

Another object of the present disclosure is to provide an automatic control system that measures the power delivered to a patient.

Yet a further object of the present disclosure is to provide an automatic control system that is adaptable to both monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical generator configurations.

It is a further object of the present disclosure to provide an automatic control system that adjusts the power delivered to a patient by an electrosurgical generator.

SUMMARY

An automatic control system for an electrosurgical generator is hereinafter disclosed. The automatic control system includes voltage and current sensing circuits, a processing circuit, an output determining circuit, and a control circuit. The voltage and current sensing circuits produce voltage and current signals that are representative of the voltage and current present in the output of the electrosurgical generator. These signals are coupled to the processing circuit that uses a Goertzel algorithm to determine the phase difference between the voltage waveform and the current waveform according to circuitry within the processing circuit.

The processing circuit produces a phase difference signal that is communicated to the output determining circuit for determining the output of the electrosurgical generator. The output determining circuit produces an output signal that is compared to a reference signal in the control circuit. The control circuit determines the difference between the output signal and the reference signal and generates a feedback signal that is representative of the difference. The feedback signal is communicated to a drive control circuit for controlling the output of a drive circuit.

Preferably, the Goertzel algorithm determines phase angle between the voltage waveform and the current waveform. Advantageously, the phase angle is used to compensate for energy delivery at the operating site. It is also contemplated that the phase angle can be utilized to provide feedback to the generator about tissue relating to at least one of: tissue change over time, tissue impedance, tissue type, tissue cycle completion.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the presently disclosed are described herein with reference to the drawing, wherein:

FIG. 1 is block diagram of an automatic control system for an electrosurgical generator in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the presently disclosed automatic control system will now be described in detail with reference to the drawing where, in FIG. 1, an exemplary embodiment of the presently disclosed automatic control system 10 is illustrated. Automatic control system 10 is ideally disposed within an electrosurgical generator 11. Electrosurgical generator 11 includes a user control 16 preferably on its front panel accessible to the doctor for setting the output level desired for a particular electrosurgical procedure. User control 16 may be a knob, a slider, or other structures and/or devices as is known in the art for use by the doctor to set a reference signal 26 indicative of the desired output.

A voltage sensing circuit 17 has an isolation transformer, which acts as an inductive pickup. Its primary side is electrically connected between leads 14 and 15 for inducing a voltage signal 18 on the secondary windings thereby responding to the high frequency electrosurgical energy supplied by electrosurgical generator 11 flowing through leads 14 and 15. A current sensing circuit 19 responds to high frequency electrosurgical energy supplied by electrosurgical generator 11 and flowing through return lead 15. Current sensing circuit 19 provides a current signal 20 as an instantaneous output representative of the current passing therethrough. Preferably, voltage signal 18 and current signal 20 are AC waveforms that are representative of the output of leads 14 and 15.

Operatively connected to leads 14 and 15 are electrodes 12 and 13. Electrodes 12 and 13 are used to provide the output of electrosurgical generator 11 to a patient. In a bipolar configuration, electrodes 12 and 13 are both present in an electrosurgical instrument (not shown), which is used at a surgical site of the patient with electrode 13 providing the return path for the output of electrosurgical generator 11.

In a monopolar configuration, the electrosurgical instrument (not shown) includes one electrode 12 while electrode 13 is connected to a surface near the patient and provides the return path. The active ends of electrodes 12 and 13 are electrically connected to electrosurgical generator 11 by one or more conductive cables. Although monopolar and bipolar configurations are used in electrosurgical generators, they are electrically equivalent and equally suited for use with automatic control system 10 of the present disclosure.

Voltage sensing circuit 17 and current sensing circuit 19 are operatively coupled to a processing circuit 21. In a preferred embodiment, processing circuit 21 includes one or more digital signal processors (DSP) and associated circuitry. The DSPs may be upgradeable using flash ROM as is known in the art. Upgrades for the DSPs may be stored on computer readable media such as magnetic disks, optical disks, magnetic tape, or other media as is known in the art. Processing circuit 21 simultaneously receives voltage signal 18 and current signal 20.

In a preferred embodiment, processing circuit uses the Goertzel algorithm for processing voltage and current signals 18, 20. The Goertzel algorithm is advantageously implemented as a second order recursive infinite impulse response filter, as shown below.

The Goertzel algorithm is defined by the equation:

Hf i ⁡ ( z ) = 1 - ⅇ ⁢ 2 ⁢ π ⁢ ⁢ f i f s ⁢ z - 1 1 - 2 ⁢ cos ⁡ ( 2 ⁢ π ⁢ ⁢ f i f S ) ⁢ z - 1 + z - 2
Where fi is the frequency of interest and fA is the sampling frequency.


The Goertzel algorithm is implemented digitally as:

υ k ⁡ [ n ] = x ⁡ [ n ] + 2 ⁢ ⁢ cos ⁡ ( 2 ⁢ π ⁢ ⁢ k N ) ⁢ υ k ⁡ [ n - 1 ] - υ k ⁡ [ n - 2 ]

Since the output frequency of electrosurgical generator 11 is known, and preferably, about 470 KHz, the digitally implemented Goertzel algorithm calculates the real and imaginary frequency components of the known waveform using the following formulae:
Real=(vk[n−1]−(vk[n−2]*cos (2πk/N))
Imaginary=(vk[n−2]*sin (2πk/N))
Magnitude=square_root (Real2+Imaginary2)
Phase=ATAN (Imaginary/Real)
The DSPs of processing circuit 21 calculates the Voltage_Phase for voltage signal 18 and the Current_Phase for current signal 20 according to the above-mentioned formulae. Additionally, the phase shift, preferably in radians, between voltage signal 18 and current signal 20 can then be calculated by applying the algorithm on voltage signal 18 and current signal 20 concurrently and subtracting the difference in the phases as follows:
Phase_Difference=Current_Phase−Voltage_Phase.

This phase calculation is implemented to calculate the phase differential between voltage signal 18 and current signal 20. In the preferred embodiment, the DSPs of processing circuit 21 include the Goertzel algorithm along with associated processing software to determine the phase difference between voltage signal 18 and current signal 20. Additionally, processing circuit 21 determines a magnitude value of both voltage and current signals 18, 20 and communicates these values along with the Phase_Difference to an output determining circuit 24 as phase difference signal 22.

In one embodiment, output determining circuit 24 includes a microprocessor with associated circuitry for calculating the dosage (current, power or voltage) output of electrosurgical generator 11 using the calculated Phase_Difference and values of the voltage and current outputs of electrosurgical generator 11. In an AC circuit, power is determined by the formula P=EI cos (q), where P is the power measured in watts, E is a voltage value, I is a current value, and q is the Phase_Difference between the voltage and current waveforms.

By advantageously using the Goertzel algorithm for a single known value of frequency, automatic control system 10 of the present disclosure calculates the output for electrosurgical generator 11 using fewer computational steps than a DFT. More particularly, due to the frequency of the output and the selected sampling rate for the voltage and current components of the output, there is insufficient bandwidth to use a DFT to determine the Phase_Difference. However, processing circuit 21, according to the present disclosure, determines the Phase_Difference using the Goertzel algorithm, thereby using fewer computational steps and within the existing bandwidth. As used herein, bandwidth refers to the time between the voltage and/or current samples acquired by voltage and current sensing circuits 17, 19.

Preferably, automatic control system 10 additionally calculates the output of electrosurgical generator 11 and performs any necessary adjustments to the output within the existing bandwidth. In the preferred embodiment, after automatic control system 10 calculates the output and performs any necessary adjustments, there is additional bandwidth available before the next sample of the output is taken. Furthermore, by using fewer computational steps to determine Phase_Difference, a minimum amount of data is lost between samples.

Preferably, the Goertzel algorithm is used to determine the phase angle or Phase_Difference between the voltage waveform and the current waveform. Advantageously, the Phase_Difference is used to compensate for energy delivery at the operating site. It is also contemplated that the Phase_Difference can be utilized to provide feedback to the generator 11 about tissue relating to at least one of: tissue change over time, tissue impedance, tissue type, tissue cycle completion.

Extra bandwidth between samples of the output is advantageously utilized to perform additional calculations, perform additional control functions, or allow the output frequency of electrosurgical generator 11 to be increased. By way of example, such additional calculations include average values of voltage and current, peak values of voltage and current, and root mean square values of voltage and current. It is contemplated that, additional control functions may include calibration of system components and adjusting system parameters for cable compensation.

Output determining circuit 24 includes circuitry for determining electrosurgical generator's 11 output. Preferably, output determining circuit 24 includes a processor and associated circuitry for determining the current, voltage, and/or power delivered to the patient. An output signal 25 is generated by output determining circuit 24 and is coupled to an input of a control circuit 27. In a preferred embodiment, voltage and current signals 18, 20 are also communicated to output determining circuit 24. The circuitry in output determining circuit 24 determines the output of electrosurgical generator 11 using voltage and current signals 18, 20 in conjunction with phase difference signal 22. The output of electrosurgical generator 11 is represented by a value of output signal 25.

Control circuit 27 has at least two inputs where a first input is output signal 25 and a second input is a reference signal 26. Reference signal 26 is controlled by the setting of user control 16 and it establishes a reference value for control circuit 27. In a preferred embodiment, control circuit 27 includes at least one DSP and associated circuitry for determining the difference between output signal 25 and reference signal 26. A feedback signal 28 is generated by control circuit 27 where the feedback signal 28 is representative of the difference between output signal 25 and reference signal 26.

Feedback signal 28 is operatively coupled to a drive control circuit 34 for controlling the output of a drive circuit 33. Drive control circuit 34 includes structure and/or circuitry for controlling the output of drive circuit 33. In one embodiment, drive control circuit 34 controls an input to drive circuit 33 for adjusting the output of drive circuit 33 according to a value of feedback signal 28. Alternatively, drive control circuit 34 controls the output of drive circuit 33 by adjusting the biasing of associated circuitry in drive circuit 33 according to a value of feedback signal 28, thereby controlling its output.

During operation of electrosurgical generator 11, drive circuit 33 produces an output, or drive signal, that is coupled to a first winding of a transformer. A portion of the output present on the first winding of the transformer is coupled to a second winding of the transformer that is electrically communicated to leads 14 and 15. Leads 14 and 15 are electrically connected to electrodes 12 and 13 for operating an electrosurgical instrument (not shown) during an electrosurgical procedure. The output present on leads 14 and 15 is sampled by voltage sensing circuit 17 and current sensing circuit 19. As discussed in detail above, the Phase_Difference between the output voltage waveform and output current waveform is determined by processing circuit 21 and the output of electrosurgical generator 11 is determined by output determining circuit 24.

As output from electrosurgical generator 11 increases, the values of voltage signal 18 and current signal 20 also increase in a proportional relationship. Output determining circuit 24 receives phase difference signal 22 from processing circuit 21 and determines the change in the output. Accordingly, an increase in output is reflected in an increase in output signal 25 that is coupled to control circuit 27. Due to the increase in output signal 25, the difference between output signal 25 and reference signal 26 decreases resulting in a decreased feedback signal 28.

When output signal 25 is substantially equal to reference signal 26, feedback signal 28 is essentially zero. Additionally, the substantial equality of these signals indicates that electrosurgical generator 11 is producing the desired output for the selected electrosurgical procedure.

Other uses for electrosurgical generator 11 including automatic control system 10 are envisioned to be within the scope of this disclosure. Such applications include procedures where fine control and accuracy of delivered output is desirable. These applications include neurosurgical applications, ligasure sealing, thoracic and throat procedures, ocular surgery, procedures on small structures, and neonatal procedures. The determination of the Phase_Difference will allow output compensation so that with a known cable and handset, the output delivered to the patient can be more accurately calculated.

Further still, since automatic control system 10 determines the Phase_Difference between the voltage and current components of the output, this information may be coupled with known values of a handset and cable electrical characteristics (i.e. resistance, capacitance, and inductance) to determine the distance between the electrosurgical instrument and the surface of the patient. This is especially advantageous in a coagulation procedure where an electrosurgical generator is used in conjunction with an electrosurgical pencil (i.e. monopolar mode of operation) disposede above the surface of the patient. In this procedure, the electrosurgical generator typically produces a high voltage that arcs from the electrosurgical pencil to the surface of the patient, thereby coagulating affected tissue. By determining the distance between the electrosurgical pencil and the patient, automatic control system 10 can adjust the power output to a desired value that is sufficient to coagulate the affected tissue without producing additional power.

From the foregoing and with reference to the various figure drawings, those skilled in the art will appreciate that certain modifications can also be made to the present disclosure without departing from the scope of the same. For example, Although a Goertzel algorithm is described herein as one low computation algorithm for determining the magnitude and phase components of a narrow band sinusoidal signal, any other algorithm which similarly derives the magnitude and phase components could also be used, such as a ‘Fourier Transform’, ‘Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)’ or ‘Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)’. Other similar algorithms which focus on a narrow band of frequencies, will gain the benefit of reduced computational effort similar to the Goertzel implementation.

Although the illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be affected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.

Claims

1. A system for controlling an output of an electrosurgical generator comprising:

a drive circuit for generating an output, the output being responsive to a feedback signal and operatively coupled to at least one electrode of the electrosurgical generator;
at least one sensing circuit operatively coupled to the at least one electrode for generating a first signal corresponding to a value of a voltage waveform present on the at least one electrode and a second signal corresponding to a value of a current waveform present on the at least one electrode;
a processing circuit for receiving the first and second signals, wherein the processing circuit implements the Goertzel algorithm for determining a phase of each of the voltage waveform and the current waveform;
a determining circuit in communication with the processing circuit for generating an output signal as a function of a phase difference between the voltage waveform and the current waveform; and
a control circuit for generating a feedback signal, the feedback signal representative of a difference between a value of the output signal and a reference value, the feedback signal operatively coupled to the drive circuit.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the processing circuit includes at least one digital signal processor.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the phase difference is used to compensate for energy delivery at the operating site.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the phase difference provides feedback to the generator about tissue relating to at least one of: tissue change over time, tissue impedance, tissue type, tissue cycle completion.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one sensing circuit includes a voltage sensing circuit and/or a current sensing circuit.

6. A system for controlling an output of an electrosurgical generator comprising:

a drive circuit for generating an output, the output being responsive to a feedback signal from at least one electrode operatively coupled to the electrosurgical generator;
at least one sensing circuit operatively coupled to the at least one electrode that generates a first signal corresponding to a value of a voltage waveform present on the at least one electrode and a second signal corresponding to a value of a current waveform present on the at least one electrode;
a processing circuit that receives the first and second signals, wherein the processing circuit implements the Goertzel algorithm for determining a phase of each of the voltage waveform and the current waveform; and
a determining circuit in communication with the processing circuit that generates an output signal as a function of a phase difference between the voltage waveform and the current waveform.

7. The system of claim 6, further comprising:

a control circuit that generates a feedback signal, the feedback signal representative of a difference between a value of the output signal and a reference value, the feedback signal operatively coupled to the drive circuit.

8. The system of claim 6, wherein the processing circuit includes at least one digital signal processor.

9. The system of claim 6, wherein the phase difference is used to compensate for energy delivery at the operating site.

10. The system of claim 6, wherein the phase difference provides feedback to the generator relating to at least one of: tissue change over time, tissue impedance, tissue type and tissue cycle completion.

11. The system of claim 6, wherein the at least one sensing circuit includes at least one of a voltage sensing circuit and a current sensing circuit.

12. A method for controlling an output of an electrosurgical generator comprising the step of:

generating an output through at least one electrode operatively coupled to the electrosurgical generator, the output being responsive to a feedback signal;
generating a first signal corresponding to a value of a voltage waveform present on the at least one electrode and a second signal corresponding to a value of a current waveform present on the at least one electrode;
processing the first and second signals using the Goertzel algorithm to determine a phase of each of the voltage waveform and the current waveform; and
generating an output signal as a function of a phase difference between the voltage waveform and the current waveform.

13. A method according to claim 12, further comprising the step of:

generating a feedback signal representative of a difference between a value of the output signal and a reference value, the feedback signal operatively coupled to the drive circuit.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
1787709 January 1931 Wappler
1813902 July 1931 Bovie
1841968 January 1932 Lowry
1863118 June 1932 Liebel
1945867 February 1934 Rawls
2827056 March 1958 Degelman
2849611 August 1958 Adams
2982881 May 1961 Reich
3058470 October 1962 Seeliger et al.
3089496 May 1963 Degelman
3163165 December 1964 Islikawa
3252052 May 1966 Nash
3391351 July 1968 Trent
3402326 September 1968 Guasco et al.
3413480 November 1968 Biard et al.
3436563 April 1969 Regitz
3439253 April 1969 Piteo
3439680 April 1969 Thomas, Jr.
3461874 August 1969 Martinez
3471770 October 1969 Haire
3478744 November 1969 Leiter
3486115 December 1969 Anderson
3495584 February 1970 Schwalm
3513353 May 1970 Lansch
3514689 May 1970 Glannamore
3515943 June 1970 Warrington
3551786 December 1970 Van Gulik
3562623 February 1971 Farnsworth
3571644 March 1971 Jakoubovitch
3589363 June 1971 Banko
3595221 July 1971 Blackett
3601126 August 1971 Estes
3611053 October 1971 Rowell
3641422 February 1972 Farnsworth et al.
3662151 May 1972 Haffey
3675655 July 1972 Sittner
3683923 August 1972 Anderson
3693613 September 1972 Kelman
3697808 October 1972 Lee
3699967 October 1972 Anderson
3720896 March 1973 Biertein
3743918 July 1973 Maitre
3766434 October 1973 Sherman
3768482 October 1973 Shaw
3783340 January 1974 Becker
3784842 January 1974 Kremer
3801766 April 1974 Morrison, Jr.
3801800 April 1974 Newton
3812858 May 1974 Oringer
3815015 June 1974 Swin et al.
3826263 July 1974 Cage et al.
3828768 August 1974 Douglas
3848600 November 1974 Patrick, Jr. et al.
3870047 March 1975 Gonser
3875945 April 1975 Friedman
3885569 May 1975 Judson
3897787 August 1975 Ikuno et al.
3897788 August 1975 Newton
3901216 August 1975 Felger
3905373 September 1975 Gonser
3913583 October 1975 Bross
3923063 December 1975 Andrews et al.
3933157 January 20, 1976 Bjurwill et al.
3946738 March 30, 1976 Newton et al.
3952748 April 27, 1976 Kaliher et al.
3963030 June 15, 1976 Newton
3964487 June 22, 1976 Judson
3971365 July 27, 1976 Smith
3980085 September 14, 1976 Ikuno
4005714 February 1, 1977 Hiltebrandt
4024467 May 17, 1977 Andrews et al.
4041952 August 16, 1977 Morrison, Jr. et al.
4051855 October 4, 1977 Schneiderman
4063557 December 20, 1977 Wuchinich et al.
4074719 February 21, 1978 Semm
4092986 June 6, 1978 Schneiderman
4094320 June 13, 1978 Newton et al.
4102341 July 25, 1978 Ikuno et al.
4114623 September 19, 1978 Meinke et al.
4121590 October 24, 1978 Gonser
4123673 October 31, 1978 Gonser
4126137 November 21, 1978 Archibald
4145636 March 20, 1979 Doi
4171700 October 23, 1979 Farin
4188927 February 19, 1980 Harris
4191188 March 4, 1980 Belt et al.
4196734 April 8, 1980 Harris
4200104 April 29, 1980 Harris
4200105 April 29, 1980 Gonser
4209018 June 24, 1980 Meinke et al.
4231372 November 4, 1980 Newton
4232676 November 11, 1980 Herczog
4237887 December 9, 1980 Gosner
4237891 December 9, 1980 DuBose et al.
4281373 July 28, 1981 Mabille
4287557 September 1, 1981 Brehse
4303073 December 1, 1981 Archibald
4311154 January 19, 1982 Sterzer et al.
4314559 February 9, 1982 Allen
4321926 March 30, 1982 Roge
4334539 June 15, 1982 Childs et al.
4343308 August 10, 1982 Gross
4372315 February 8, 1983 Shapiro et al.
4376263 March 8, 1983 Pittroff et al.
4378801 April 5, 1983 Oosten
4384582 May 24, 1983 Watt
4397314 August 9, 1983 Vaguine
4407272 October 4, 1983 Yamaguchi
4411266 October 25, 1983 Cosman
4416276 November 22, 1983 Newton et al.
4416277 November 22, 1983 Newton et al.
4429694 February 7, 1984 McGreevy
4437464 March 20, 1984 Crow
4438766 March 27, 1984 Bowers
4452546 June 5, 1984 Hiltebrandt et al.
4463759 August 7, 1984 Garito et al.
4470414 September 11, 1984 Imagawa et al.
4472661 September 18, 1984 Culver
4474179 October 2, 1984 Koch
4492231 January 8, 1985 Auth
4492832 January 8, 1985 Taylor
4494541 January 22, 1985 Archibald
4514619 April 30, 1985 Kugelman
4520818 June 4, 1985 Mickiewicz
4559943 December 24, 1985 Bowers
4565200 January 21, 1986 Cosman
4566454 January 28, 1986 Mehl et al.
4569345 February 11, 1986 Manes
4576177 March 18, 1986 Webster, Jr.
4582057 April 15, 1986 Auth et al.
4590934 May 27, 1986 Malis et al.
4608977 September 2, 1986 Brown
4630218 December 16, 1986 Hurley
4632109 December 30, 1986 Patterson
4644955 February 24, 1987 Mioduski
4646222 February 24, 1987 Okado et al.
4651264 March 17, 1987 Shiao-Chung Hu
4651280 March 17, 1987 Chang et al.
4657015 April 14, 1987 Irnich
4658815 April 21, 1987 Farin et al.
4658819 April 21, 1987 Harris et al.
4658820 April 21, 1987 Klicek
4662383 May 5, 1987 Sogawa et al.
4712559 December 15, 1987 Turner
4727874 March 1, 1988 Bowers et al.
4735204 April 5, 1988 Sussman et al.
4739759 April 26, 1988 Rexroth et al.
4741334 May 3, 1988 Irnich
4754757 July 5, 1988 Feucht
4788634 November 29, 1988 Schlecht et al.
4805621 February 21, 1989 Heinze et al.
4818954 April 4, 1989 Flachenecker et al.
4827911 May 9, 1989 Broadwin et al.
4827927 May 9, 1989 Newton
4832024 May 23, 1989 Boussignac et al.
4848335 July 18, 1989 Manes
4848355 July 18, 1989 Nakamura et al.
4860745 August 29, 1989 Farin et al.
4862889 September 5, 1989 Feucht
4880719 November 14, 1989 Murofushi et al.
4890610 January 2, 1990 Kirwan et al.
4903696 February 27, 1990 Stasz et al.
4907589 March 13, 1990 Cosman
4922210 May 1, 1990 Flachenecker et al.
4931047 June 5, 1990 Broadwin et al.
4931717 June 5, 1990 Gray et al.
4938761 July 3, 1990 Ensslin
4942313 July 17, 1990 Kinzel
4961047 October 2, 1990 Carder
4961435 October 9, 1990 Kitagawa et al.
4966597 October 30, 1990 Cosman
RE33420 November 6, 1990 Sussman
4969885 November 13, 1990 Farin
4993430 February 19, 1991 Shimoyama et al.
4995877 February 26, 1991 Ams et al.
5015227 May 14, 1991 Broadwin et al.
5019176 May 28, 1991 Brandhorst, Jr.
5029588 July 9, 1991 Yock et al.
5087257 February 11, 1992 Farin
5103804 April 14, 1992 Abele et al.
5108389 April 28, 1992 Cosmescu
5108391 April 28, 1992 Flachenecker
5122137 June 16, 1992 Lennox
5133711 July 28, 1992 Hagen
5151102 September 29, 1992 Kamiyama et al.
5152762 October 6, 1992 McElhenney
5157603 October 20, 1992 Scheller et al.
5160334 November 3, 1992 Billings et al.
5162217 November 10, 1992 Hartman
5167658 December 1, 1992 Ensslin
5190517 March 2, 1993 Zieve et al.
5196008 March 23, 1993 Kuenecke
5196009 March 23, 1993 Kirwan, Jr.
5201900 April 13, 1993 Nardella
5207691 May 4, 1993 Nardella
5230623 July 27, 1993 Guthrie et al.
5233515 August 3, 1993 Cosman
5249121 September 28, 1993 Baum et al.
RE34432 November 2, 1993 Bertrand
5267994 December 7, 1993 Gentelia et al.
5267997 December 7, 1993 Farin
5281213 January 25, 1994 Milder et al.
5300068 April 5, 1994 Rosar et al.
5300070 April 5, 1994 Gentelia
5318563 June 7, 1994 Malis et al.
5323778 June 28, 1994 Kandarpa et al.
5324283 June 28, 1994 Heckele
5330518 July 19, 1994 Neilson et al.
5334193 August 2, 1994 Nardella
5341807 August 30, 1994 Nardella
5342356 August 30, 1994 Ellman
5342357 August 30, 1994 Nardella
5342409 August 30, 1994 Mullett
5348554 September 20, 1994 Imran et al.
5370645 December 6, 1994 Klicek et al.
5370672 December 6, 1994 Fowler et al.
5370675 December 6, 1994 Edwards et al.
5372596 December 13, 1994 Klicek et al.
5383874 January 24, 1995 Jackson
5383876 January 24, 1995 Nardella
5383917 January 24, 1995 Desai et al.
5385148 January 31, 1995 Lesh et al.
5396062 March 7, 1995 Eisentraut et al.
5400267 March 21, 1995 Denen et al.
5403311 April 4, 1995 Abele et al.
5403312 April 4, 1995 Yates et al.
5409000 April 25, 1995 Imran
5409006 April 25, 1995 Buchholtz et al.
5409485 April 25, 1995 Suda
5413573 May 9, 1995 Koivukangas
5414238 May 9, 1995 Steigerwald et al.
5417719 May 23, 1995 Hull et al.
5422567 June 6, 1995 Matsunaga
5423808 June 13, 1995 Edwards et al.
5423809 June 13, 1995 Klicek
5423810 June 13, 1995 Goble et al.
5430434 July 4, 1995 Lederer et al.
5432459 July 11, 1995 Thompson
5433739 July 18, 1995 Sluijter et al.
5434398 July 18, 1995 Goldberg
5436566 July 25, 1995 Thompson
5438302 August 1, 1995 Goble
5443463 August 22, 1995 Stern et al.
5445635 August 29, 1995 Denen
5451224 September 19, 1995 Goble et al.
5458597 October 17, 1995 Edwards et al.
5462521 October 31, 1995 Brucker et al.
5472441 December 5, 1995 Edwards et al.
5472443 December 5, 1995 Cordis et al.
5478303 December 26, 1995 Foley-Nolan et al.
5480399 January 2, 1996 Hebborn
5483952 January 16, 1996 Aranyi
5490850 February 13, 1996 Ellman et al.
5496312 March 5, 1996 Klicek
5496313 March 5, 1996 Gentelia et al.
5500012 March 19, 1996 Brucker et al.
5500616 March 19, 1996 Ochi
5514129 May 7, 1996 Smith
5520684 May 28, 1996 Imran
5531774 July 2, 1996 Schulman et al.
5534018 July 9, 1996 Wahlstrand et al.
5536267 July 16, 1996 Edwards et al.
5540681 July 30, 1996 Strul et al.
5540683 July 30, 1996 Ichikawa
5540684 July 30, 1996 Hassler, Jr.
5540724 July 30, 1996 Cox
5556396 September 17, 1996 Cohen et al.
5558671 September 24, 1996 Yates
5569242 October 29, 1996 Lax et al.
5571147 November 5, 1996 Sluijter et al.
5573533 November 12, 1996 Strul
5584830 December 17, 1996 Ladd et al.
5588432 December 31, 1996 Crowley
5594636 January 14, 1997 Schauder
5596466 January 21, 1997 Ochi
5599344 February 4, 1997 Paterson
5599345 February 4, 1997 Edwards et al.
5605150 February 25, 1997 Radons et al.
5613966 March 25, 1997 Makower et al.
5613996 March 25, 1997 Lindsay
5625370 April 29, 1997 D'Hont
5626575 May 6, 1997 Crenner
5628745 May 13, 1997 Bek
5643330 July 1, 1997 Holsheimer et al.
5647869 July 15, 1997 Goble
5647871 July 15, 1997 Levine et al.
5651780 July 29, 1997 Jackson et al.
5658322 August 19, 1997 Fleming
5660567 August 26, 1997 Nierlich et al.
5688267 November 18, 1997 Panescu et al.
5690692 November 25, 1997 Fleming
5693042 December 2, 1997 Boiarski et al.
5694304 December 2, 1997 Telefus et al.
5695494 December 9, 1997 Becker
5696351 December 9, 1997 Benn et al.
5702386 December 30, 1997 Stern et al.
5702429 December 30, 1997 King
5707369 January 13, 1998 Vaitekunas et al.
5712772 January 27, 1998 Telefus et al.
5713896 February 3, 1998 Nardella
5720744 February 24, 1998 Eggleston et al.
5722975 March 3, 1998 Edwards et al.
5733281 March 31, 1998 Nardella
5749869 May 12, 1998 Lindenmeier et al.
5749871 May 12, 1998 Hood et al.
5755715 May 26, 1998 Stern
5766165 June 16, 1998 Gentelia et al.
5769847 June 23, 1998 Panescu
5772659 June 30, 1998 Becker et al.
5792138 August 11, 1998 Shipp
5797802 August 25, 1998 Nowak
5797902 August 25, 1998 Netherly
5814092 September 29, 1998 King
5817093 October 6, 1998 Williamson, IV et al.
5820568 October 13, 1998 Willis
5827271 October 27, 1998 Bussey et al.
5830212 November 3, 1998 Cartmell
5836943 November 17, 1998 Miller, III
5836990 November 17, 1998 Li
5846236 December 8, 1998 Lindenmeier et al.
5868737 February 9, 1999 Taylor et al.
5868739 February 9, 1999 Lindenmeier et al.
5868740 February 9, 1999 LeVeen et al.
5871481 February 16, 1999 Kannenberg et al.
5897552 April 27, 1999 Edwards et al.
5908444 June 1, 1999 Azure
5913882 June 22, 1999 King
5921982 July 13, 1999 Lesh et al.
5925070 July 20, 1999 King et al.
5931836 August 3, 1999 Hatta et al.
5938690 August 17, 1999 Law et al.
5948007 September 7, 1999 Starkebaum et al.
5951545 September 14, 1999 Schilling
5951546 September 14, 1999 Lorentzen
5954686 September 21, 1999 Garito et al.
5954717 September 21, 1999 Behl et al.
5954719 September 21, 1999 Chen et al.
5961344 October 5, 1999 Rosales et al.
5971980 October 26, 1999 Sherman
5976128 November 2, 1999 Schilling et al.
5983141 November 9, 1999 Sluijter et al.
6010499 January 4, 2000 Cobb
6014581 January 11, 2000 Whayne et al.
6033399 March 7, 2000 Gines
6044283 March 28, 2000 Fein et al.
6053910 April 25, 2000 Fleenor
6053912 April 25, 2000 Panescu et al.
6056745 May 2, 2000 Panescu et al.
6056746 May 2, 2000 Goble et al.
6063075 May 16, 2000 Mihori
6063078 May 16, 2000 Wittkampf
6068627 May 30, 2000 Orszulak et al.
6074386 June 13, 2000 Goble et al.
6093186 July 25, 2000 Goble
RE36871 September 12, 2000 Epstein
6113591 September 5, 2000 Whayne et al.
6113596 September 5, 2000 Hooven
6123702 September 26, 2000 Swanson et al.
6132429 October 17, 2000 Baker
6142992 November 7, 2000 Cheng et al.
6162217 December 19, 2000 Kannenberg et al.
6171304 January 9, 2001 Netherly et al.
6203541 March 20, 2001 Keppel
6210403 April 3, 2001 Klicek
6228080 May 8, 2001 Gines
6228081 May 8, 2001 Goble
6231569 May 15, 2001 Bek
6235020 May 22, 2001 Cheng et al.
6238387 May 29, 2001 Miller, III
6238388 May 29, 2001 Ellman
6241725 June 5, 2001 Cosman
6245065 June 12, 2001 Panescu
6246912 June 12, 2001 Sluijter et al.
6251106 June 26, 2001 Becker et al.
6258085 July 10, 2001 Eggleston
6261285 July 17, 2001 Novak
6273886 August 14, 2001 Edwards
6275786 August 14, 2001 Daners
6293941 September 25, 2001 Strul
6306131 October 23, 2001 Hareyama et al.
6306134 October 23, 2001 Goble et al.
6309386 October 30, 2001 Bek
6325799 December 4, 2001 Goble
6337998 January 8, 2002 Behl et al.
6338657 January 15, 2002 Harper et al.
6350262 February 26, 2002 Ashley
6358245 March 19, 2002 Edwards
6383183 May 7, 2002 Sekino et al.
6398779 June 4, 2002 Buysse et al.
6398781 June 4, 2002 Goble et al.
6402741 June 11, 2002 Keppel et al.
6402743 June 11, 2002 Orszulak et al.
6436096 August 20, 2002 Hareyama
6451015 September 17, 2002 Rittman, III et al.
6458121 October 1, 2002 Rosenstock .
6464689 October 15, 2002 Qin
6464696 October 15, 2002 Oyama
6506189 January 14, 2003 Rittman, III et al.
6508815 January 21, 2003 Strul
6511476 January 28, 2003 Hareyama
6511478 January 28, 2003 Burnside et al.
6524308 February 25, 2003 Muller et al.
6547786 April 15, 2003 Goble
6562037 May 13, 2003 Paton
6565559 May 20, 2003 Eggleston
6573248 June 3, 2003 Ramasamy et al.
6575969 June 10, 2003 Rittman, III et al.
6620157 September 16, 2003 Dabney et al.
6623423 September 23, 2003 Sakurai
6635057 October 21, 2003 Harano
6648883 November 18, 2003 Francischelli
6652514 November 25, 2003 Ellman
6663623 December 16, 2003 Oyama et al.
6663624 December 16, 2003 Edwards
6666860 December 23, 2003 Takahashi
6679875 January 20, 2004 Honda
6682527 January 27, 2004 Strul
6685700 February 3, 2004 Behl
6685701 February 3, 2004 Orszulak et al.
6692489 February 17, 2004 Heim
6712813 March 30, 2004 Ellman
6730080 May 4, 2004 Harano
6733495 May 11, 2004 Bek
6733498 May 11, 2004 Paton
6740079 May 25, 2004 Eggers
6740085 May 25, 2004 Hareyama
6783523 August 31, 2004 Qin
6790206 September 14, 2004 Panescu
6796981 September 28, 2004 Wham
6824539 November 30, 2004 Novak
6830569 December 14, 2004 Thompson
6843789 January 18, 2005 Goble
6849073 February 1, 2005 Hoey
6855141 February 15, 2005 Lovewell
6855142 February 15, 2005 Harano
6860881 March 1, 2005 Sturm
6864686 March 8, 2005 Novak
6875210 April 5, 2005 Refior
6893435 May 17, 2005 Roane
7044948 May 16, 2006 Keppel
7060063 June 13, 2006 Marion et al.
7063692 June 20, 2006 Sakurai et al.
7066933 June 27, 2006 Hagg
7131860 November 7, 2006 Sartor et al.
7137980 November 21, 2006 Buysse et al.
20010014804 August 16, 2001 Goble et al.
20010031962 October 18, 2001 Eggleston
20020035353 March 21, 2002 Edwards et al.
20020035363 March 21, 2002 Edwards et al.
20020035364 March 21, 2002 Schoenman et al.
20020068932 June 6, 2002 Edwards
20020107517 August 8, 2002 Witt et al.
20020111624 August 15, 2002 Witt et al.
20020193787 December 19, 2002 Qin
20030004510 January 2, 2003 Wham et al.
20030060818 March 27, 2003 Kannenberg
20030078572 April 24, 2003 Pearson et al.
20030139741 July 24, 2003 Goble et al.
20030153908 August 14, 2003 Goble
20030163123 August 28, 2003 Goble
20030163124 August 28, 2003 Goble
20030171745 September 11, 2003 Francischelli
20030199863 October 23, 2003 Swanson
20030225401 December 4, 2003 Eggers et al.
20040002745 January 1, 2004 Flemming
20040015163 January 22, 2004 Buysse et al.
20040015216 January 22, 2004 DeSisto
20040019347 January 29, 2004 Sakurai
20040024395 February 5, 2004 Ellman
20040030328 February 12, 2004 Eggers
20040030330 February 12, 2004 Brassell et al.
20040044339 March 4, 2004 Beller
20040049179 March 11, 2004 Francischelli
20040054365 March 18, 2004 Goble
20040059323 March 25, 2004 Sturm et al.
20040068304 April 8, 2004 Paton
20040082946 April 29, 2004 Malis
20040095100 May 20, 2004 Thompson
20040097912 May 20, 2004 Gonnering
20040097914 May 20, 2004 Pantera
20040097915 May 20, 2004 Refior
20040116919 June 17, 2004 Heim
20040133189 July 8, 2004 Sakurai
20040138653 July 15, 2004 Dabney
20040138654 July 15, 2004 Goble
20040147918 July 29, 2004 Keppel
20040167508 August 26, 2004 Wham et al.
20040172016 September 2, 2004 Bek
20040193148 September 30, 2004 Wham et al.
20040230189 November 18, 2004 Keppel
20040243120 December 2, 2004 Orszulak et al.
20040260279 December 23, 2004 Goble
20050004564 January 6, 2005 Wham
20050004569 January 6, 2005 Witt et al.
20050021022 January 27, 2005 Sturm et al.
20050101951 May 12, 2005 Wham
20050113818 May 26, 2005 Sartor
20050113819 May 26, 2005 Wham
20050149151 July 7, 2005 Orszulak
20050182398 August 18, 2005 Paterson
20050197659 September 8, 2005 Bahney
20050203504 September 15, 2005 Wham et al.
20060025760 February 2, 2006 Podhajsky
20060079871 April 13, 2006 Plaven et al.
20060161148 July 20, 2006 Behnke
20060178664 August 10, 2006 Keppel
20060224152 October 5, 2006 Behnke et al.
20060281360 December 14, 2006 Sartor et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
179607 March 1905 DE
1099658 February 1961 DE
1139927 November 1962 DE
1149832 June 1963 DE
1439302 January 1969 DE
2439587 February 1975 DE
2455174 May 1975 DE
2407559 August 1975 DE
2602517 July 1976 DE
2504280 August 1976 DE
2540968 March 1977 DE
2820908 November 1978 DE
2803275 August 1979 DE
2823291 November 1979 DE
2946728 May 1981 DE
3143421 May 1982 DE
3045996 July 1982 DE
3143421 August 1982 DE
3120102 December 1982 DE
3510586 October 1986 DE
3604823 August 1987 DE
390937 April 1989 DE
3904558 August 1990 DE
3942998 July 1991 DE
4339049 May 1995 DE
19717411 November 1998 DE
19848540 May 2000 DE
246350 November 1987 EP
310431 April 1989 EP
325456 July 1989 EP
336742 October 1989 EP
390937 October 1990 EP
556705 August 1993 EP
0569130 November 1993 EP
608609 August 1994 EP
836868 April 1998 EP
878169 November 1998 EP
1293171 March 2003 EP
0880220 June 2006 EP
1275415 October 1961 FR
1347865 November 1963 FR
2313708 December 1976 FR
2502935 October 1982 FR
2517953 June 1983 FR
2573301 May 1986 FR
607850 September 1948 GB
855459 November 1960 GB
902775 August 1962 GB
2164473 March 1986 GB
2214430 September 1989 GB
2358934 August 2001 GB
166452 January 1965 SU
727201 April 1980 SU
WO92/06642 April 1992 WO
WO93/24066 December 1993 WO
WO94/24949 November 1994 WO
WO94/28809 December 1994 WO
WO95/09577 April 1995 WO
WO95/19148 July 1995 WO
WO96/02180 February 1996 WO
WO96/04860 February 1996 WO
WO96/08794 March 1996 WO
WO96/18349 June 1996 WO
WO96/29946 October 1996 WO
WO96/39914 December 1996 WO
WO97/06739 February 1997 WO
WO97/06740 February 1997 WO
WO97/06855 February 1997 WO
WO97/17029 May 1997 WO
WO02/011634 February 2002 WO
WO02/045589 June 2002 WO
WO02/47565 June 2002 WO
WO02/088128 July 2002 WO
WO 03/092520 November 2003 WO
WO 05/060365 November 2003 WO
WO 04/028385 April 2004 WO
WO 04/098385 April 2004 WO
WO 05/046496 May 2005 WO
WO 05/048809 June 2005 WO
WO 05/050151 June 2005 WO
WO05048809 June 2005 WO
Other references
  • Ogden “Goertzel Alternative to the Fourier Transform” Jun. 1993, pp. 485-487, Electronics World; Reed Business Publishing, Sutton, Surrey, GB vol. 99, No. 1687.
  • Alexander et al., “Magnetic Resonance Image-Directed Stereotactic Neurosurgery: Use of Image Fusion with Computerized Tomography to Enhance Spatial Accuracy” Journal Neurosurgery, 83; (1995) pp. 271-276.
  • Anderson et al., “A Numerical Study of Rapid Heating for High Temperature Radio Frequency Hyperthermia” International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 35 (1994) pp. 297-307.
  • Astrahan, “A Localized Current Field Hyperthermia System for Use with 192-Iridium Interstitial Implants” Medical Physics, 9 (3), May/Jun. 1982.
  • Bergdahl et al., “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic computerized Bipolar Coagulator” Journal of Neurosurgery 75:1, (Jul. 1991) pp. 148-151.
  • Cosman et al., “Methods of Making Nervous System Lesions” In William RH, Rengachary SS (eds): Neurosurgery, New York: McGraw-Hill, vol. 111, (1984), pp. 2490-2499.
  • Cosman et al., “Radiofrequency Lesion Generation and Its Effect on Tissue Impedance” Applied Neurophysiology 51: (1988) pp. 230-242.
  • Cosman et al., “Theoretical Aspects of Radiofrequency Lesions in the Dorsal Root Entry Zone” Neurosurgery 15:(1984) pp. 945-950.
  • Geddes et al., “The Measurement of Physiologic Events by Electrical Impedence” Am. J. Ml, Jan. Mar. 1964, pp. 16-27.
  • Goldberg et al., “Tissue Ablation with Radiofrequency: Effect of Probe Size, Gauge, Duration, and Temperature on Lesion Volume” Acad Radio (1995) vol. 2. No. 5, pp. 399-404.
  • Sugita et al., “Bipolar Coagulator with Automatic Thermocontrol” J. Neurosurg., vol. 41, Dec. 1944, pp. 777-779.
  • Vallfors et al., “Automatically Controlled Bipolar Electrosoagulation-‘COA-COMP’” Neurosurgical Review 7:2-3 (1984) pp. 187-190.
  • Wald et al., “Accidental Burns”, JAMA, Aug. 16, 1971, vol. 217, No. 7, pp. 916-921.
  • Kevin Banks, “The Goertzel Algorithm” Embedded Systems Programming, Aug. 28, 2002.
  • Medtrex Brochure “The O.R. Pro 300” 1 p. Sep. 1998.
  • Valleylab Brochure “Valleylab Electroshield Monitoring System” 2 pp. Nov. 1995.
  • Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. Brochure, “Kleppinger Bipolar Forceps & Bipolar Generator” 3 pp. Jan. 1989.
  • Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J.Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151.
  • International Search Report PCT/US03/37110 dated Jul. 25, 2005.
  • International Search Report PCT/US03/37310 dated Aug. 13, 2004.
  • International Search Report EP 04009964 dated Jul. 13, 2004.
  • International Search Report EP 98300964.8 dated Dec. 4, 2000.
  • International Search Report EP 04015981.6 dated Sep. 29, 2004.
  • International Search Report EP 05014156.3 dated Dec. 28, 2005.
  • International Search Report EP 05021944.3 dated Jan. 18, 2006.
  • International Search Report EP 05022350.2 dated Jan. 18, 2006.
  • Valleylab Brochure Valleylab Electroshield Monitoring System 2 pp. Nov. 1995.
  • Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. Brochure, “Kleppinger Bipolar Forceps & Bipolar Generator” 3 pp. Jan. 1989.
  • Chicharo et al. “A Sliding Goertzel Algorith” Aug. 1996, pp. 283-297 Signal Processing, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, NL vol. 52 No. 3.
  • Ogden Goertzel Alternative to the Fourier Transform: Jun. 1993 pp. 485-487 Electronics World; Reed Business Publishing, Sutton, Surrey, BG vol. 99, No. 9. 1687.
  • International Search Report EP 0409964 Jul. 13, 2004.
  • International Search Report—PCT/US03/37110, Jul. 2005.
  • International Search Report—PCT/US03/37310, Aug. 2004.
  • International Search Report—EP4009964, Jul. 2004.
  • International Search Report—EP98300964.8, Dec. 2000.
  • International Search Report—EP04015981.6, Oct. 2004.
  • Chicharo et al. “A Sliding Goertzel Algorith” Aug. 1996, pp. 283-297 Signal Processing, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, NL vol. 52 No. 3.
  • Ogden “Goertzel Alternative to the Fourier Transform: Jun. 1993 pp. 485-487 Electronics World; Reed Business Publishing, Sutton, Surrey, BG vol. 99, No. 9. 1687.
  • Ogden “Goertzel Alternative to the Fourier Transform” Jun. 1993 pp. 485-487 Electronics World; Reed Business Publishing, Sutton, Surrey, GB vol. 99, No. 1687.
  • International Search Report EP 06000708.5 dated Apr. 21, 2006.
  • International Search Report-Extended EP 06000708.5 dated Aug. 22, 2006.
  • International Search Report EP 05002769.7 dated Jun. 9, 2006.
  • International Search Report EP 06006717.0 dated Aug. 7, 2006.
  • Ni W et al: “A Signal Processing Method for the Coriolis Mass Flowmeter Based on a Normalized . . .” Journal of Applied Sciences-Yingyong Kexue Xuebao, Shanghai CN, vol. 23 No. 2; (2005-03); 160-164.
Patent History
Patent number: 7300435
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 21, 2003
Date of Patent: Nov 27, 2007
Patent Publication Number: 20050113819
Assignee: Sherwood Services Ag (Schaffhausen)
Inventors: Robert H. Wham (Boulder, CO), Thomas A. Sturm (Erie, CO)
Primary Examiner: Michael Peffley
Application Number: 10/719,305
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Systems (606/34); Electrical Application (606/32)
International Classification: A61B 18/18 (20060101);