Data synchronization
Application data used by enterprise applications running on one or more servers can be synchronized with application data deployed from other locations. Application data can be transmitted as XML files over HTTP to facilitate synchronization with web-enabled servers. Multiple service data repositories can be synchronized with application data residing in a master data repository that runs within an enterprise application. Server-to-server data synchronization functionality is also provided through the use of proxy data repositories. Application data files can be deployed from an author system to remote servers. Newly-authored application data files can be versioned in the author system using a source control system and selectively deployed to various servers by the author in conjunction with a multi-stage testing process in preparation for deployment of the application data to a production server.
Latest BEA Systems, Inc. Patents:
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/279,450 entitled “Data Synchronization” filed Oct. 24, 2002; which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/386,487 entitled “Data Synchronization”, filed Oct. 24, 2001.
COPYRIGHT NOTICEA portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to technology for deploying and synchronizing data.
2. Description of the Related Art
Web-based software applications have emerged as powerful tools which provide valuable services to vendors and customers alike. E-business web applications can be configured to operate in accordance with business logic to implement a variety of processes which facilitate electronic commerce. Such applications may also provide services which interact with remote Internet clients and/or applications.
The JAVA™2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE), available from Sun Microsystems, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif., facilitates the development of electronic business web applications that run within the context of multi-tier enterprise applications. The operation of such web applications is governed by the data (“application data”) used to configure the web applications. As a result, the functionality provided by web applications can be modified by updating the application data associated with the applications.
Unfortunately, the deployment and synchronization of new or updated application data to J2EE web applications can be a cumbersome process. Newly-authored application data is often stored in a database in accordance with a particular schema used by the database. If a developer seeks to deploy such application data to a running production server, the data must be extracted from the database before being converted into a form suitable for transmission to the server. Scripts are often necessary to export the application data from a database into a file system. Scripts may also be necessary to import the application data to a running server. For these reasons, maintaining different versions of application data can also be an awkward and unwieldy endeavor.
Moreover, before new application data can be moved to a running production server, it may be necessary to deploy the application data to multiple servers to comply with a multi-stage testing process. This transfer of application data can be a cumbersome manual process which becomes increasingly error-prone as application data is transferred from server to server and more persons are involved. Thus, prior techniques of deploying and synchronizing application data in the context of the J2EE platform can be largely ad-hoc and undesirable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention, roughly described, is directed to synchronizing application data used by enterprise applications running on one or more servers. For example, in one embodiment, application data is received and synchronized with a database and data repository. In another embodiment, an application data deployment method is provided allowing application data to be authored, submitted to a source control system, and sent to a remote server where a data repository of the server is synchronized with the data.
In another embodiment, application data is synchronized between enterprise applications through the use of proxy data repositories. In another embodiment, application data is synchronized between data repositories through the polling of one data repository by another.
Systems and computer readable media are also provided for implementing portions of, and variations of, these methods. Many other embodiments are also possible, as set forth in the present disclosure.
In order to produce the application data, author 110 can interface with various software tools, such as control center 120. In one embodiment, control center 120 is an E-Business Control Center tool available from BEA Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif. The data created by author 110 using control center 120 can be stored in a local hierarchical file system as a set of application data files.
Application data files 130 produced by the interaction of author 110 with control center 120 can be checked into source control system 140. Source control system 140 allows different versions of the application data files 130 to be easily recalled for testing, deployment, synchronization, and/or other purposes. For example, if faulty application data is deployed to a web application, the source control system 140 allows author 110 to recall a previous version of the application data and re-deploy the data to the web application. The use of source control system 140 can also prevent multiple authors from overwriting each other's files when application data is being authored concurrently. In one embodiment, source control system 140 is any suitable source control system known in the art.
After application data has been created, it will typically be subject to a multi-stage approval process to test the interaction of the newly-authored application data with other data and/or applications created by other authors. For example, before application data is deployed to a production server, it may be subject to separate development and quality assurance stages. These stages help ensure that the web applications running on live production servers will operate reliably.
During this collaborative development of web applications, it can become desirable for software developers to synchronize application data across enterprise application boundaries to remote servers. Various data synchronization processes further described herein leverage the advantages provided by HTTP to facilitate the synchronization of application data on remote servers accessible via the Internet. In accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention, newly-created application data can be synchronized with one or more remote running servers. By identifying the URL associated with a server, application data can be remotely synchronized to any server accessible over the Internet via HTTP.
Each server of
Server tools 260 and database tools 265 are also illustrated in
Data sync web application 330 also runs within enterprise application 320 and is responsible for performing data synchronization operations in accordance with the present invention. As indicated by
Data sync application 330 can intercept incoming synchronization requests sent from author system 220 over network 210. In one embodiment, these synchronization requests are sent as XML over HTTP in accordance with a remote protocol. When data sync application 330 receives a synchronization request from author system 220, it channels application data received from author system 220 to master data repository 340 which is a runtime representation of the application data. The data sync application 330 also channels the application data received to database 380 which is a persistent storage location for the application data. In one embodiment, data repository 340 stores incoming application data as Enterprise Java Beans (EJBs). In another embodiment, database 380 is a relational database management system.
In one embodiment, data sync application 330 includes a set of JSPs that are capable of reporting: the contents of master data repository 340, data repositories that are successfully synchronized with master data repository 340, and the contents of each data repository in enterprise application 320.
The service data repositories of
Each time the master data repository 340 is synchronized, it notifies data repositories 370 and 375. These data repositories then synchronize their data subsets with the data in the master. In one embodiment, application data is communicated between the components of enterprise application 320 in accordance with a binary protocol. Multiple enterprise applications (not shown) running on server 310 can also be synchronized using a separate data sync application running in each enterprise application. Proxy data repositories can be used to facilitate such synchronizations.
In some cases, the master data repository 340 does not directly synchronize data with a data repository. Rather, a notification chain can be employed using multiple data repositories. Referring to
In various embodiments of the present invention, different synchronization modes can be employed. In a refresh-from-client mode, all application data for a given application is synchronized. Using this mode, all data is cleared from the data repositories and then all relevant application data files are sent from the author's local file system to a data sync web application. This mode can be helpful to synchronize in-memory data with persisted data, or to recover from a synchronization error. In a one-way-from-client mode, only those application data files that have been removed, updated, or created on the author's local file are updated. Thus, the amount of data transmitted between an author system and a server to be synchronized can be minimized.
Upon initiation of the synchronization process in step 410, application data to be synchronized will be sent from author system 220 to server 310 over network 210 (step 420). In one embodiment, the application data is sent as XML files over HTTP using a POST command. The application data is received by data sync application 330. Data sync application 330 then synchronizes database 380 and master data repository 340 with the newly-received application data (step 430). As a result of step 430, database 380 contains the updated application data stored in a database format for persistent storage, and master data repository 340 contains the updated application data stored in an EJB runtime format.
As previously described herein, the various applications and services of
Service data repositories 370 and/or 375 can also poll master data repository 340 periodically to check whether application data has been updated. If updated data is detected, then application data maintained in master data repository 340 can be synchronized with service data repositories 370 and/or 375.
Master data repository 340 maintains a log that describes each update and includes a description of which data repositories were successfully updated, and which were not. Data sync application 330 can return a status message to author system 220 via HTTP or a Java command shell to identify which application data files were successfully synchronized. Each data repository of
As illustrated in
Data sync web application 680 is an instance of a data sync application that runs on remote server 650. However, rather than receiving updates directly from an author system 220 (similar to data sync application 330 of
In operation, master data repository 630 receives updated application data from a data sync web application in communication with an author system (not shown) such as author system 220 of
When the updated application data is received by data sync application 680, the data sync application 650 proceeds to update remote master data repository 670 with the updated application data. A persistent storage database (not shown in
Thus, by subscribing proxy data repositories to receive updates from a master data repository, application data within enterprise applications running on remote servers can be synchronized with application data received by the master data repository. Proxies can also be used to synchronize data across different enterprise applications running on the same server. Moreover, by linking remote servers to additional remote servers through proxies, chains of multiple servers can be synchronized. These principles can be further applied to the synchronizing application data across clusters of servers as set forth in
Where applicable, the present invention can be implemented using hardware, software, or combinations of hardware and software. Software in accordance with the present invention, such as program code and/or data, can stored on one or more computer readable mediums. Also where applicable, the various hardware components and/or software components set forth herein can be combined into composite components comprising software, hardware, or both without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Similarly, where applicable, the various hardware components and/or software components set forth herein can be dissected into sub-components comprising software, hardware, or both without departing from the spirit of the present invention. In addition, where applicable, it is contemplated that software components can be implemented as hardware components, and vice-versa. Furthermore, where applicable, the various steps set forth herein can be combined into composite steps and/or dissected into sub-steps. It is also contemplated that software components set forth herein can be implemented using one or more general purpose or specific purpose computers and/or computer systems, networked and/or otherwise.
The foregoing disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention to the precise forms or particular fields of use disclosed. It is contemplated that various alternate embodiments and/or modifications to the present invention are possible in light of the disclosure.
Claims
1. A method for synchronizing application data in a cluster of servers, comprising:
- receiving an update to the application data in a first server in the cluster of servers, wherein the update to the application data is provided from a device external to the cluster of servers;
- synchronizing the application data with the update to form updated application data;
- forwarding the updated application data to a proxy data repository in the first server; and
- forwarding said updated application data from said proxy data repository to a second server in the cluster of servers, wherein said updated application data is configured to synchronize with the proxy data repository on said second server, said synchronizing in said second server being performed on data in the second server by the second server separate from the synchronizing performed in the first server;
- forwarding said updated application data from said proxy data repository to a third server in the cluster of servers wherein said updated application data is configured to synchronize with the proxy data repository on said third server, said synchronizing in said third server being performed on data in the third server by the third server separate from the synchronizing performed in the first and second server,
- wherein said proxy data repository receives the updated application data in a binary protocol and marshals the updated application data into an XML format before forwarding the updated application data to the second server and the third server.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein:
- the proxy data repository transmits the XML formatted data over HTTP to the second server and the third server.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein:
- said method is performed as part of a testing process in preparation for deployment of said updated application data to a production server.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the second server and the third server are running on a same enterprise application as the first server.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
- synchronizing data in a master data repository in the first server with the updated application data;
- notifying a first service data repository in the first server each time the master data repository is synchronized; and
- synchronizing data subsets in the first service data repository with the data in the master data repository, said synchronizing being performed on the data subsets by the first service data repository separate from synchronizing performed on the new application data in the master data repository after being notified by the master data repository.
6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:
- notifying said master data repository the first service data repository has been synchronized with the updated application data; and
- maintaining a log in the master data repository indicating when the first service data repository has been synchronized.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
- maintaining a log in the first server indicating when the proxy data repository in the second server has been synchronized with the updated application data and when the proxy data repository in the third server has been synchronized with the updated application data.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: storing the updated application data in a master data repository in the first server separate from the proxy data repository.
5237614 | August 17, 1993 | Weiss |
5347653 | September 13, 1994 | Flynn et al. |
5355474 | October 11, 1994 | Thuraisingham et al. |
5369702 | November 29, 1994 | Shanton |
5426747 | June 20, 1995 | Weinreb et al. |
5544322 | August 6, 1996 | Cheng et al. |
5557747 | September 17, 1996 | Rogers et al. |
5627886 | May 6, 1997 | Bowman |
5649195 | July 15, 1997 | Scott et al. |
5757669 | May 26, 1998 | Christie et al. |
5758355 | May 26, 1998 | Buchanan |
5797128 | August 18, 1998 | Birnbaum |
5825883 | October 20, 1998 | Archibald et al. |
5826000 | October 20, 1998 | Hamilton |
5838909 | November 17, 1998 | Roy et al. |
5848396 | December 8, 1998 | Gerace |
5867667 | February 2, 1999 | Butman et al. |
5884325 | March 16, 1999 | Bauer |
5889953 | March 30, 1999 | Thebaut et al. |
5918210 | June 29, 1999 | Rosenthal et al. |
5926816 | July 20, 1999 | Bauer |
5950195 | September 7, 1999 | Stockwell et al. |
5954798 | September 21, 1999 | Shelton et al. |
5956400 | September 21, 1999 | Chaum et al. |
5956719 | September 21, 1999 | Kudo et al. |
5966707 | October 12, 1999 | Van Huben et al. |
5987469 | November 16, 1999 | Lewis et al. |
5987611 | November 16, 1999 | Freund |
5991735 | November 23, 1999 | Gerace |
6006194 | December 21, 1999 | Merel |
6006265 | December 21, 1999 | Rangan et al. |
6009410 | December 28, 1999 | LeMole et al. |
6026433 | February 15, 2000 | D'Arlach et al. |
6029144 | February 22, 2000 | Barrett et al. |
6029182 | February 22, 2000 | Nehab et al. |
6054910 | April 25, 2000 | Tada et al. |
6055515 | April 25, 2000 | Consentino et al. |
6055637 | April 25, 2000 | Hudson et al. |
6058392 | May 2, 2000 | Sampson et al. |
6081829 | June 27, 2000 | Sidana |
6083276 | July 4, 2000 | Davidson et al. |
6092083 | July 18, 2000 | Brodersen et al. |
6098173 | August 1, 2000 | Elgressy et al. |
6105027 | August 15, 2000 | Schneider et al. |
6108687 | August 22, 2000 | Craig |
6112192 | August 29, 2000 | Capek |
6122647 | September 19, 2000 | Horowitz et al. |
6128663 | October 3, 2000 | Thomas |
6133915 | October 17, 2000 | Arcuri et al. |
6141010 | October 31, 2000 | Hoyle |
6141686 | October 31, 2000 | Jackowski et al. |
6148333 | November 14, 2000 | Guedalia et al. |
6154844 | November 28, 2000 | Touboul et al. |
6157924 | December 5, 2000 | Austin |
6158010 | December 5, 2000 | Moriconi et al. |
6161139 | December 12, 2000 | Win et al. |
6167407 | December 26, 2000 | Nachenberg et al. |
6167445 | December 26, 2000 | Gai et al. |
6167448 | December 26, 2000 | Hemphill et al. |
6169794 | January 2, 2001 | Oshimi et al. |
6170009 | January 2, 2001 | Mandal et al. |
6178172 | January 23, 2001 | Rochberger |
6182142 | January 30, 2001 | Win et al. |
6182226 | January 30, 2001 | Reid et al. |
6182277 | January 30, 2001 | DeGroot et al. |
6185587 | February 6, 2001 | Bernardo et al. |
6188399 | February 13, 2001 | Voas et al. |
6195696 | February 27, 2001 | Baber et al. |
6202066 | March 13, 2001 | Barkley et al. |
6202157 | March 13, 2001 | Brownlie et al. |
6202207 | March 13, 2001 | Donohue |
6205466 | March 20, 2001 | Karp et al. |
6209101 | March 27, 2001 | Mitchem et al. |
6216231 | April 10, 2001 | Stubblebine |
6226745 | May 1, 2001 | Wiederhold |
6233576 | May 15, 2001 | Lewis |
6236991 | May 22, 2001 | Frauenhofer et al. |
6237628 | May 29, 2001 | Miller et al. |
6241608 | June 5, 2001 | Torango |
6249795 | June 19, 2001 | Douglis |
6253321 | June 26, 2001 | Nikander et al. |
6260050 | July 10, 2001 | Yost et al. |
6269393 | July 31, 2001 | Yost et al. |
6269456 | July 31, 2001 | Hodges et al. |
6275941 | August 14, 2001 | Saito et al. |
6285366 | September 4, 2001 | Ng et al. |
6285983 | September 4, 2001 | Jenkins |
6285985 | September 4, 2001 | Horstmann |
6292900 | September 18, 2001 | Ngo et al. |
6295607 | September 25, 2001 | Johnson |
6301613 | October 9, 2001 | Ahlstrom et al. |
6304881 | October 16, 2001 | Halim et al. |
6308163 | October 23, 2001 | Du et al. |
6317868 | November 13, 2001 | Grimm et al. |
6327594 | December 4, 2001 | Van Huben et al. |
6327618 | December 4, 2001 | Ahlstrom et al. |
6336073 | January 1, 2002 | Ihara et al. |
6339423 | January 15, 2002 | Sampson et al. |
6339826 | January 15, 2002 | Hayes, Jr. et al. |
6341352 | January 22, 2002 | Child et al. |
6353886 | March 5, 2002 | Howard et al. |
6360363 | March 19, 2002 | Moser et al. |
6377973 | April 23, 2002 | Gideon |
6381579 | April 30, 2002 | Gervais et al. |
6385627 | May 7, 2002 | Cragun |
6393474 | May 21, 2002 | Eichert et al. |
6397222 | May 28, 2002 | Zellweger |
6397231 | May 28, 2002 | Salisbury et al. |
6412070 | June 25, 2002 | Van Dyke et al. |
6412077 | June 25, 2002 | Roden et al. |
6418448 | July 9, 2002 | Sarkar |
6418452 | July 9, 2002 | Kraft |
6430556 | August 6, 2002 | Goldberg et al. |
6438563 | August 20, 2002 | Kawagoe |
6449638 | September 10, 2002 | Wecker et al. |
6457007 | September 24, 2002 | Kikuchi et al. |
6460084 | October 1, 2002 | Van Horne et al. |
6460141 | October 1, 2002 | Olden |
6463440 | October 8, 2002 | Hind et al. |
6466239 | October 15, 2002 | Ishikawa |
6466949 | October 15, 2002 | Yang et al. |
6473791 | October 29, 2002 | Al-Ghosein et al. |
6477543 | November 5, 2002 | Huang et al. |
6477575 | November 5, 2002 | Koeppel et al. |
6484177 | November 19, 2002 | Van Huben et al. |
6484261 | November 19, 2002 | Wiegel |
6487594 | November 26, 2002 | Bahlmann |
6510513 | January 21, 2003 | Danieli |
6519647 | February 11, 2003 | Howard et al. |
6530024 | March 4, 2003 | Proctor |
6539375 | March 25, 2003 | Kawasaki |
6571247 | May 27, 2003 | Danno et al. |
6581071 | June 17, 2003 | Gustman et al. |
6584454 | June 24, 2003 | Hummel et al. |
6587849 | July 1, 2003 | Mason et al. |
6587876 | July 1, 2003 | Mahon et al. |
6598077 | July 22, 2003 | Primak et al. |
6615218 | September 2, 2003 | Mandal et al. |
6618806 | September 9, 2003 | Brown et al. |
6633538 | October 14, 2003 | Tanaka et al. |
6654747 | November 25, 2003 | Van Huben et al. |
6665677 | December 16, 2003 | Wotring et al. |
6668354 | December 23, 2003 | Chen et al. |
6684369 | January 27, 2004 | Bernardo et al. |
6697805 | February 24, 2004 | Choquier et al. |
6721888 | April 13, 2004 | Liu et al. |
6725446 | April 20, 2004 | Hahn et al. |
6732144 | May 4, 2004 | Kizu et al. |
6735586 | May 11, 2004 | Timmons |
6735701 | May 11, 2004 | Jacobson |
6738789 | May 18, 2004 | Multer et al. |
6751659 | June 15, 2004 | Fenger et al. |
6754672 | June 22, 2004 | McLauchlin |
6757698 | June 29, 2004 | McBride et al. |
6769095 | July 27, 2004 | Brassard et al. |
6769118 | July 27, 2004 | Garrison et al. |
6779002 | August 17, 2004 | Mwaura |
6785721 | August 31, 2004 | Immerman |
6789202 | September 7, 2004 | Ko et al. |
6801949 | October 5, 2004 | Bruck et al. |
6834284 | December 21, 2004 | Acker et al. |
6856999 | February 15, 2005 | Flanagin et al. |
6857012 | February 15, 2005 | Sim et al. |
6865549 | March 8, 2005 | Connor |
6880005 | April 12, 2005 | Bell et al. |
6889222 | May 3, 2005 | Zhao |
6901403 | May 31, 2005 | Bata et al. |
6904454 | June 7, 2005 | Stickler |
6915482 | July 5, 2005 | Jellum |
6920457 | July 19, 2005 | Pressmar |
6922695 | July 26, 2005 | Skufca et al. |
6934934 | August 23, 2005 | Osborne et al. |
6957261 | October 18, 2005 | Lortz |
6961897 | November 1, 2005 | Peel et al. |
6965999 | November 15, 2005 | Fox et al. |
6970876 | November 29, 2005 | Hotti et al. |
6978379 | December 20, 2005 | Goh et al. |
6985915 | January 10, 2006 | Somalwar et al. |
6988138 | January 17, 2006 | Alcorn et al. |
7003578 | February 21, 2006 | Kanada et al. |
7035879 | April 25, 2006 | Shi et al. |
7035944 | April 25, 2006 | Fletcher et al. |
7047522 | May 16, 2006 | Dixon, III et al. |
7054910 | May 30, 2006 | Nordin et al. |
7062490 | June 13, 2006 | Adya et al. |
7062511 | June 13, 2006 | Poulsen |
7080000 | July 18, 2006 | Cambridge |
7085755 | August 1, 2006 | Bluhm et al. |
7089584 | August 8, 2006 | Sharma |
7093200 | August 15, 2006 | Schreiber et al. |
7096224 | August 22, 2006 | Murthy et al. |
7174563 | February 6, 2007 | Brownlie et al. |
7181731 | February 20, 2007 | Pace |
7290015 | October 30, 2007 | Singhal et al. |
20010009016 | July 19, 2001 | Hofmann et al. |
20010032128 | October 18, 2001 | Kepecs |
20010034771 | October 25, 2001 | Hutsch et al. |
20010039586 | November 8, 2001 | Primak |
20010044810 | November 22, 2001 | Timmons |
20020005867 | January 17, 2002 | Gvily |
20020019827 | February 14, 2002 | Shiman et al. |
20020029296 | March 7, 2002 | Anuff et al. |
20020046286 | April 18, 2002 | Caldwell |
20020059394 | May 16, 2002 | Sanders |
20020062451 | May 23, 2002 | Scheidt et al. |
20020067370 | June 6, 2002 | Forney et al. |
20020069261 | June 6, 2002 | Bellare et al. |
20020087571 | July 4, 2002 | Stapel et al. |
20020103818 | August 1, 2002 | Amberden |
20020104071 | August 1, 2002 | Charisius et al. |
20020107913 | August 8, 2002 | Rivera et al. |
20020107920 | August 8, 2002 | Hotti |
20020111998 | August 15, 2002 | Kim |
20020112171 | August 15, 2002 | Ginter et al. |
20020120685 | August 29, 2002 | Srivastava et al. |
20020124053 | September 5, 2002 | Adams et al. |
20020135617 | September 26, 2002 | Samid |
20020143819 | October 3, 2002 | Han et al. |
20020147645 | October 10, 2002 | Alao et al. |
20020147696 | October 10, 2002 | Acker et al. |
20020152267 | October 17, 2002 | Lennon |
20020152279 | October 17, 2002 | Sollenberger et al. |
20020161903 | October 31, 2002 | Besaw |
20020169893 | November 14, 2002 | Chen et al. |
20020173971 | November 21, 2002 | Stirpe et al. |
20020178119 | November 28, 2002 | Griffin et al. |
20020194267 | December 19, 2002 | Flesner et al. |
20030014442 | January 16, 2003 | Shiigi et al. |
20030032409 | February 13, 2003 | Hutcheson et al. |
20030065721 | April 3, 2003 | Roskind |
20030069874 | April 10, 2003 | Hertzog |
20030078959 | April 24, 2003 | Yeung et al. |
20030078972 | April 24, 2003 | Tapissier et al. |
20030088617 | May 8, 2003 | Clark et al. |
20030105974 | June 5, 2003 | Griffin et al. |
20030110448 | June 12, 2003 | Haute et al. |
20030115292 | June 19, 2003 | Griffin et al. |
20030117437 | June 26, 2003 | Cook et al. |
20030120686 | June 26, 2003 | Kim et al. |
20030126464 | July 3, 2003 | McDaniel et al. |
20030126558 | July 3, 2003 | Griffin |
20030131113 | July 10, 2003 | Reeves et al. |
20030135490 | July 17, 2003 | Barrett et al. |
20030145275 | July 31, 2003 | Qian et al. |
20030146937 | August 7, 2003 | Lee |
20030149722 | August 7, 2003 | Jolley et al. |
20030167315 | September 4, 2003 | Chowdhry et al. |
20030167455 | September 4, 2003 | Iborra et al. |
20030187956 | October 2, 2003 | Belt et al. |
20030204481 | October 30, 2003 | Lau |
20030212766 | November 13, 2003 | Giles et al. |
20030216938 | November 20, 2003 | Shour |
20030220913 | November 27, 2003 | Doganata et al. |
20030220963 | November 27, 2003 | Golovinsky et al. |
20030229623 | December 11, 2003 | Chang et al. |
20040019650 | January 29, 2004 | Auvenshire |
20040024812 | February 5, 2004 | Park et al. |
20040030744 | February 12, 2004 | Rubin et al. |
20040030795 | February 12, 2004 | Hesmer et al. |
20040078371 | April 22, 2004 | Worrall et al. |
20040098467 | May 20, 2004 | Dewey et al. |
20040167880 | August 26, 2004 | Smith |
20040167899 | August 26, 2004 | Patadia et al. |
20040205473 | October 14, 2004 | Fisher et al. |
20040205557 | October 14, 2004 | Bahrs et al. |
20040230546 | November 18, 2004 | Rogers |
20040243824 | December 2, 2004 | Jones |
20050021502 | January 27, 2005 | Chen et al. |
20050050184 | March 3, 2005 | Boden et al. |
20050060324 | March 17, 2005 | Johnson et al. |
20050086206 | April 21, 2005 | Balasubramanian et al. |
20050097008 | May 5, 2005 | Ehring et al. |
20050198617 | September 8, 2005 | Kim et al. |
20060059107 | March 16, 2006 | Elmore et al. |
20060085412 | April 20, 2006 | Johnson et al. |
20060122882 | June 8, 2006 | Brown et al. |
20070083484 | April 12, 2007 | McVeigh et al. |
- Method and System for Visually Constructing Document Type Definitions and Related Artifacts Using a Reusable Object Model, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, May 23, 2001.
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 22, 2005
Date of Patent: Apr 7, 2009
Patent Publication Number: 20050187986
Assignee: BEA Systems, Inc. (Redwood Shores, CA)
Inventors: Daniel Selman (Stodmarsh), Robert Bergman (Denver, CO), Edward K. O'Neil (Boulder, CO)
Primary Examiner: Don Wong
Assistant Examiner: Thanh-Ha Dang
Attorney: Fliesler Meyer LLP
Application Number: 11/112,440
International Classification: G06F 17/30 (20060101); G06F 15/16 (20060101); G06F 7/00 (20060101);