Polyphase transverse and/or commutated flux systems

- Motor Excellence, LLC

Disclosed are single- and poly-phase transverse and/or commutated flux machines and components thereof, and methods of making and using the same. Exemplary devices, including polyphase devices, may variously be configured with an interior rotor and/or an interior stator. Other exemplary devices, including polyphase devices, may be configured in a slim, stacked, and/or nested configuration. Via use of such polyphase configurations, transverse and/or commutated flux machines can achieve improved performance, efficiency, and/or be sized or otherwise configured for various applications.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/110,874 filed on Nov. 3, 2008 and entitled “ELECTRICAL OUTPUT GENERATING AND DRIVEN ELECTRICAL DEVICES USING COMMUTATED FLUX AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USE THEREOF INCLUDING DEVICES WITH TRUNCATED STATOR PORTIONS.”

This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/110,879 filed on Nov. 3, 2008 and entitled “ELECTRICAL OUTPUT GENERATING AND DRIVEN ELECTRICAL DEVICES USING COMMUTATED FLUX AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USE THEREOF.”

This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/110,884 filed on Nov. 3, 2008 and entitled “METHODS OF MACHINING AND USING AMORPHOUS METALS OR OTHER MAGNETICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS INCLUDING TAPE WOUND TORROID MATERIAL FOR VARIOUS ELECTROMAGNETIC APPLICATIONS.”

This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/110,889 filed on Nov. 3, 2008 and entitled “MULTI-PHASE ELECTRICAL OUTPUT GENERATING AND DRIVEN ELECTRICAL DEVICES WITH TAPE WOUND CORE LAMINATE ROTOR OR STATOR ELEMENTS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USE THEREOF.”

This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/114,881 filed on Nov. 14, 2008 and entitled “ELECTRICAL OUTPUT GENERATING AND DRIVEN ELECTRICAL DEVICES USING COMMUTATED FLUX AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USE THEREOF.”

This application is also a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional No. 61/168,447 filed on Apr. 10, 2009 and entitled “MULTI-PHASE ELECTRICAL OUTPUT GENERATING AND DRIVEN ELECTRICAL DEVICES, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME.” The entire contents of all of the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to electrical systems, and in particular to transverse flux machines and commutated flux machines.

BACKGROUND

Motors and alternators are typically designed for high efficiency, high power density, and low cost. High power density in a motor or alternator may be achieved by operating at high rotational speed and therefore high electrical frequency. However, many applications require lower rotational speeds. A common solution to this is to use a gear reduction. Gear reduction reduces efficiency, adds complexity, adds weight, and adds space requirements. Additionally, gear reduction increases system costs and increases mechanical failure rates.

Additionally, if a high rotational speed is not desired, and gear reduction is undesirable, then a motor or alternator typically must have a large number of poles to provide a higher electrical frequency at a lower rotational speed. However, there is often a practical limit to the number of poles a particular motor or alternator can have, for example due to space limitations. Once the practical limit is reached, in order to achieve a desired power level the motor or alternator must be relatively large, and thus have a corresponding lower power density.

Moreover, existing multipole windings for alternators and electric motors typically require winding geometry and often complex winding machines in order to meet size and/or power needs. As the number of poles increases, the winding problem is typically made worse. Additionally, as pole count increases, coil losses also increase (for example, due to resistive effects in the copper wire or other material comprising the coil). However, greater numbers of poles have certain advantages, for example allowing a higher voltage constant per turn, providing higher torque density, and producing voltage at a higher frequency.

Most commonly, electric motors are of a radial flux type. To a far lesser extent, some electric motors are implemented as transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines. It is desirable to develop improved electric motor and/or alternator performance and/or configurability. In particular, improved transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines are desirable. Moreover, transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines configured to accommodate multi-phase input and/or produce multi-phase output are desirable.

SUMMARY

This disclosure relates to transverse and/or commutated flux machines. In an exemplary embodiment, an electrical machine comprises a first conductive coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end. The first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop. The first coil portion is at least partially enclosed by a first set of flux conductors. The second coil portion is at least partially enclosed by a second set of flux conductors. The first coil portion and the second coil portion traverse at least partially overlapping angular portions with respect to a rotational axis of the electrical machine. The electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

In another exemplary embodiment, an electrical machine comprises a rotor having an inner side and an outer side with respect to the rotational axis of the rotor, the inner side defining a circle about the rotational axis, and a conductive coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end. The first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop. The conductive coil extends along only a portion of the circumference of the circle. A first set of flux conductors at least partially encloses the first coil portion. A second set of flux conductors at least partially encloses the second coil portion. The first set and the second set are engaged with the inner side of the rotor in one of a cavity engaged configuration or a face engaged configuration. The electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

In yet another exemplary embodiment, an electrical machine comprises a stator. The electrical machine further comprises a coil at least partially enclosed by the stator, the coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end. The first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop. The electrical machine further comprises a first rotor and a second rotor having a common rotational axis and common rotational plane. The stator is engaged with the first rotor at a first radius from the common rotational axis. The stator is engaged with the second rotor at a second radius from the common rotational axis. The first radius and the second radius are different. The electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

The contents of this summary section are provided only as a simplified introduction to the disclosure, and are not intended to be used to limit the scope of the appended claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

With reference to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings:

FIG. 1A illustrates an exemplary transverse flux machine in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 1B illustrates an exemplary commutated flux machine in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary axial gap configuration in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 2B illustrates an exemplary radial gap configuration in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary cavity engaged configuration in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary face engaged configuration in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 3C illustrates an exemplary face engaged transverse flux configuration in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 4 illustrates electric motor efficiency curves in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 5A illustrates a cross-section of an exemplary single-phase stator/rotor assembly in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 5B illustrates a cross-section of an exemplary three-phase configuration based on the single-phase configuration of FIG. 5A in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 5C illustrates an exemplary three-phase rotor configuration in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 5D illustrates, in close-up view, exemplary magnetic and flux concentrating portions of a rotor illustrated in FIG. 5C in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 6A illustrates an exemplary polyphase device having an interior stator in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 6B illustrates an exemplary polyphase device having an interior stator in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 6C illustrates, in close-up view, a portion of the polyphase device of FIGS. 6A and 6B, wherein the inter-core flux conductor spacing has been configured to create a 90° phase lag in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 7A illustrates an exemplary polyphase device having an interior rotor in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 7B illustrates an exemplary polyphase device having an interior rotor in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 7C illustrates, in close-up view, a portion of the polyphase device of FIGS. 7A and 7B in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 8A illustrates, in a perspective view, an exemplary polyphase device having a slim design in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 8B illustrates, in close-up view, a portion of the polyphase device of FIG. 8A in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 8C illustrates, in a face-on view, the exemplary polyphase device of FIGS. 8A and 8B in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 9A illustrates a polyphase device of FIGS. 8A-8C having a similar polyphase device nested within in a phase-matched manner in accordance with an exemplary embodiment;

FIG. 9B illustrates a polyphase device of FIGS. 8A-8C having a similar polyphase device nested within in a phase-staggered manner in accordance with an exemplary embodiment; and

FIG. 10 illustrates, in cross-sectional view, an exemplary polyphase device configured for use in a vehicle in accordance with an exemplary embodiment.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is of various exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the present disclosure in any way. Rather, the following description is intended to provide a convenient illustration for implementing various embodiments including the best mode. As will become apparent, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the elements described in these embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims.

For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques for electrical system construction, management, operation, measurement, optimization, and/or control, as well as conventional techniques for magnetic flux utilization, concentration, control, and/or management, may not be described in detail herein. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in various figures contained herein are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between various elements. It should be noted that many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical electrical system, for example an AC synchronous electric motor.

Prior electric motors, for example conventional DC brushless motors, suffer from various deficiencies. For example, many electric motors are inefficient at various rotational speeds and/or loads, for example low rotational speeds. Thus, the motor is typically operated within a narrow RPM range and/or load range of suitable efficiency. In these configurations, gears or other mechanical approaches may be required in order to obtain useful work from the motor.

Moreover, many electric motors have a low pole count. Because power is a function of torque and RPM, such motors must often be operated at a high physical RPM in order to achieve a desired power density and/or electrical frequency. Moreover, a higher power density (for example, a higher kilowatt output per kilogram of active electrical and magnetic motor mass) optionally is achieved by operating the motor at high rotational speed and therefore high electrical frequency. However, high electrical frequency can result in high core losses and hence lower efficiency. Moreover, high electrical frequency can result in increased cost, increased mechanical complexity, and/or decreased reliability. Additionally, high electrical frequency and associated losses create heat that may require active cooling, and can limit the operational range of the motor. Heat can also degrade the life and reliability of a high frequency machine.

Still other electric motors contain large volumes of copper wire or other coil material. Due to the length of the coil windings, resistive effects in the coil lead to coil losses. For example, such losses convert a portion of electrical energy into heat, reducing efficiency and potentially leading to thermal damage to and/or functional destruction of the motor.

Moreover, many prior electric motors offered low torque densities. As used herein, “torque density” refers to Newton-meters produced per kilogram of active electrical and magnetic materials. For example, many prior electric motors are configured with a torque density from about 0.5 Newton-meters per kilogram to about 3 Newton-meters per kilogram. Thus, a certain electric motor with a torque density of 1 Newton-meter per kilogram providing, for example, 10 total Newton-meters of torque may be quite heavy, for example in excess of 10 kilograms of active electrical and magnetic materials. Similarly, another electric motor with a torque density of 2 Newton-meters per kilogram providing, for example, 100 total Newton-meters of torque may also be quite heavy, for example in excess of 50 kilograms of active electrical and magnetic materials. As can be appreciated, the total weight of these electric motors, for example including weight of frame components, housings, and the like, may be significantly higher. Moreover, such prior electric motors are often quite bulky as a result of the large motor mass. Often, a motor of sufficient torque and/or power for a particular application is difficult or even impossible to fit in the available area.

Even prior transverse flux machines have been unable to overcome these difficulties. For example, prior transverse flux machines have suffered from significant flux leakage. Still others have offered torque densities of only a few Newton-meters per kilogram of active electrical and magnetic materials. Moreover, various prior transverse flux machines have been efficiently operable only within a comparatively narrow RPM and/or load range. Additionally, using prior transverse flux machines to generate substantial output power often required spinning relatively massive and complicated components (i.e., those involving permanent magnets and/or relatively exotic, dense and/or expensive flux concentrating or conducting materials) at high rates of speed. Such high-speed operation requires additional expensive and/or complicated components for support and/or system reliability. Moreover, many prior transverse flux machines are comparatively expensive and/or difficult to manufacture, limiting their viability.

In contrast, various of these problems can be solved by utilizing transverse flux machines configured in accordance with principles of the present disclosure. As used herein, a “transverse flux machine” and/or “commutated flux machine” may be any electrical machine wherein magnetic flux paths have sections where the flux is generally transverse to a rotational plane of the machine. In an exemplary embodiment, when a magnet and/or flux concentrating components are on a rotor and/or are moved as the machine operates, the electrical machine may be a pure “transverse” flux machine. In another exemplary embodiment, when a magnet and/or flux concentrating components are on a stator and/or are held stationary as the machine operates, the electrical machine may be a pure “commutated” flux machine. As is readily apparent, in certain configurations a “transverse flux machine” may be considered to be a “commutated flux machine” by fixing the rotor and moving the stator, and vice versa. Moreover, a coil may be fixed to a stator; alternatively, a coil may be fixed to a rotor.

Moreover, there is a spectrum of functionality and device designs bridging the gap between a commutated flux machine and a transverse flux machine. Certain designs may rightly fall between these two categories, or be considered to belong to both simultaneously. Therefore, as will be apparent to one skilled in the art, in this disclosure a reference to a “transverse flux machine” may be equally applicable to a “commutated flux machine” and vice versa.

Moreover, transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines may be configured in multiple ways. For example, with reference to FIG. 2A, a commutated flux machine may be configured with a stator 210 generally aligned with the rotational plane of a rotor 250. Such a configuration is referred to herein as “axial gap.” In another configuration, with reference to FIG. 2B, a commutated flux machine may be configured with stator 210 rotated about 90 degrees with respect to the rotational plane of rotor 250. Such a configuration is referred to herein as “radial gap.”

With reference now to FIG. 3A, a flux switch 352 in a commutated flux machine may engage a stator 310 by extending at least partially into a cavity defined by stator 310. Such a configuration is referred to herein as “cavity engaged.” Turning to FIG. 3B, flux switch 352 in a commutated flux machine may engage stator 310 by closely approaching two terminal faces of stator 310. Such a configuration is referred to herein as “face engaged.” Similar engagement approaches may be followed in transverse flux machines and are referred to in a similar manner.

In general, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine comprises a rotor, a stator, and a coil. A flux switch may be located on the stator or the rotor. As used herein, a “flux switch” may be any component, mechanism, or device configured to open and/or close a magnetic circuit. (i.e., a portion where the permeability is significantly higher than air). A magnet may be located on the stator or the rotor. A coil is at least partially enclosed by the stator or the rotor. Optionally, flux concentrating portions may be included on the stator and/or the rotor. With momentary reference now to FIG. 1A, an exemplary transverse flux machine 100A may comprise a rotor 150A, a stator 110A, and a coil 120A. In this exemplary embodiment, a magnet may be located on rotor 150A. With momentary reference now to FIG. 1B, an exemplary commutated flux machine 100B may comprise a rotor 150B, a stator 110B, and a coil 120B. In this exemplary embodiment, a magnet may be located on stator 110B.

Moreover, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured with any suitable components, structures, and/or elements in order to provide desired electrical, magnetic, and/or physical properties. For example, a commutated flux machine having a continuous, thermally stable torque density in excess of 50 Newton-meters per kilogram may be achieved by utilizing a polyphase configuration. As used herein, “continuous, thermally stable torque density” refers to a torque density maintainable by a motor, without active cooling, during continuous operation over a period of one hour or more. Moreover, in general, a continuous, thermally stable torque density may be considered to be a torque density maintainable by a motor for an extended duration of continuous operation, for example one hour or more, without thermal performance degradation and/or damage.

Moreover, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to achieve low core losses. By utilizing materials having high magnetic permeability, low coercivity, low hysteresis losses, low eddy current losses, and/or high electrical resistance, core losses may be reduced. For example, silicon steel, powdered metals, plated powdered metals, soft magnetic composites, amorphous metals, nanocrystalline composites, and/or the like may be utilized in rotors, stators, switches, and/or other flux conducting components of a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine. Eddy currents, flux leakage, and other undesirable properties may thus be reduced.

A transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may also be configured to achieve low core losses by varying the level of saturation in a flux conductor, such as in an alternating manner. For example, a flux conducting element in a stator may be configured such that a first portion of the flux conducting element saturates at a first time during operation of the stator. Similarly, a second portion of the same flux conducting element saturates at a second time during operation of the stator. In this manner, portions of the flux conducting element have a level of magnetic flux density significantly below the saturation induction from time to time, reducing core loss. For example, significant portions of the flux conducting element may have a level of flux density less than 25% of the saturation induction within the 50% of the time of its magnetic cycle. Moreover, any suitable flux density variations may be utilized.

Furthermore, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to achieve low coil losses. For example, in contrast to a conventional electric motor utilizing a mass of copper C in one or more coils in order to achieve a desired output power P, a particular transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may utilize only a small amount of copper C (for example, one-tenth as much copper C) while achieving the same output power P. Additionally, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to utilize coil material in an improved manner (for example, by reducing and/or eliminating “end turns” in the coil). In this manner, resistive losses, eddy current losses, thermal losses, and/or other coil losses associated with a given coil mass C may be reduced. Moreover, within a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine, a coil may be configured, shaped, oriented, aligned, manufactured, and/or otherwise configured to further reduce losses for a given coil mass C.

Additionally, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to achieve a higher voltage constant. In this manner, the number of turns in the machine may be reduced, in connection with a higher frequency. A corresponding reduction in coil mass and/or the number of turns in the coil may thus be achieved.

Yet further, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured to achieve a high flux switching frequency, for example a flux switching frequency in excess of 1000 Hz. Because flux is switched at a high frequency, torque density may be increased.

With reference now to FIG. 4, a typical conventional electric motor efficiency curve 402 for a particular torque is illustrated. Revolutions per minute (RPM) is illustrated on the X axis, and motor efficiency is illustrated on the Y axis. As illustrated, a conventional electric motor typically operates at a comparatively low efficiency at low RPM. For this conventional motor, efficiency increases and then peaks at a particular RPM, and eventually falls off as RPM increases further. As a result, many conventional electric motors are often desirably operated within an RPM range near peak efficiency. For example, one particular prior art electric motor may have a maximum efficiency of about 90% at about 3000 RPM, but the efficiency falls off dramatically at RPMs that are not much higher or lower.

Gearboxes, transmissions, and other mechanical mechanisms are often coupled to an electric motor to achieve a desired output RPM or other output condition. However, such mechanical components are often costly, bulky, heavy, and/or impose additional energy losses, for example frictional losses. Such mechanical components can reduce the overall efficiency of the motor/transmission system. For example, an electric motor operating at about 90% efficiency coupled to a gearbox operating at about 70% efficiency results in a motor/gearbox system having an overall efficiency of about 63%. Moreover, a gearbox may be larger and/or weigh more or cost more than the conventional electric motor itself. Gearboxes also reduce the overall reliability of the system.

In contrast, with continuing reference to FIG. 4 and in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse and/or commutated flux machine efficiency curve 404 for a particular torque is illustrated. In accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse and/or commutated flux machine may rapidly reach a desirable efficiency level (for example, 80% efficiency or higher) at an RPM lower than that of a conventional electric motor. Moreover, the transverse and/or commutated flux machine may maintain a desirable efficiency level across a larger RPM range than that of a conventional electric motor. Additionally, the efficiency of the transverse and/or commutated flux machine may fall off more slowly past peak efficiency RPM as compared to a conventional electric motor.

Furthermore, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse and/or commutated flux machine may achieve a torque density higher than that of a conventional electric motor. For example, in an exemplary embodiment a transverse and/or commutated flux machine may achieve a continuous, thermally stable torque density in excess of 100 Newton-meters per kilogram.

Thus, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be employed in various applications. For example, in an automotive application, a transverse and/or commutated flux machine may be utilized as a wheel hub motor, as a direct driveline motor, and/or the like. Moreover, in an exemplary embodiment having a sufficiently wide operational RPM range, particularly at lower RPMs, a transverse and/or commutated flux machine may be utilized in an automotive application without need for a transmission, gearbox, and/or similar mechanical components.

An exemplary electric or hybrid vehicle embodiment comprises a transverse flux motor for driving a wheel of the vehicle, wherein the vehicle does not comprise a transmission, gearbox, and/or similar mechanical component(s). In this exemplary embodiment, the electric or hybrid vehicle is significantly lighter than a similar vehicle that comprises a transmission-like mechanical component. The reduced weight may facilitate an extended driving range as compared to a similar vehicle with a transmission like mechanical component. Alternatively, weight saved by elimination of the gearbox allows for utilization of additional batteries for extended range. Moreover, weight saved by elimination of the gearbox allows for additional structural material for improved occupant safety. In general, a commutated flux machine having a broad RPM range of suitable efficiency may desirably be utilized in a variety of applications where a direct-drive configuration is advantageous. For example, a commutated flux machine having an efficiency greater than 80% over an RPM range from only a few RPMs to about 2000 RPMs may be desirably employed in an automobile.

Moreover, the exemplary transmissionless electric or hybrid vehicle may have a higher overall efficiency. Stated otherwise, the exemplary vehicle may more efficiently utilize the power available in the batteries due to the improved efficiency resulting from the absence of a transmission-like component between the motor and the wheel of the vehicle. This, too, is configured to extend driving range and/or reduce the need for batteries.

Additionally, the commutated flux machine is configured to have a high torque density. In accordance with principles of the present disclosure, the high torque density commutated flux machine is also well suited for use in various applications, for example automotive applications. For example, a conventional electric motor may have a torque density of between about 0.5 to about 3 Newton-meters per kilogram. Additional techniques, for example active cooling, can enable a conventional electric motor to achieve a torque density of up to about 50 Newton-meters per kilogram. However, such techniques typically add significant additional system mass, complexity, bulk, and/or cost. Additionally, such conventional electric motors configured to produce comparatively high amounts of torque, for example the Siemens 1FW6 motor, are limited to comparatively low RPM operation, for example operation below 250 RPMs.

In contrast, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, an exemplary passively cooled transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured with a continuous, thermally stable torque density in excess of 50 Newton-meters per kilogram. As used herein, “passively cooled” is generally understood to refer to systems without cooling components requiring power for operation, for example water pumps, oil pumps, cooling fans, and/or the like. Moreover, this exemplary transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured with a compact diameter, for example a diameter less than 14 inches. Another exemplary transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be configured with a continuous, thermally stable torque density in excess of 100 Newton-meters per kilogram and a diameter less than 20 inches. Accordingly, by utilizing various principles of the present disclosure, exemplary transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines may be sized and/or otherwise configured and/or shaped in a manner suitable for mounting as a wheel hub motor in an electric vehicle, because the transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine is significantly lighter and/or more compact than a conventional electric motor. In this manner, the unsprung weight of the resulting wheel/motor assembly can be reduced. This can improve vehicle handling and reduce the complexity and/or size of suspension components.

Further, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized in an electromechanical system having a rotating portion, for example a washing machine or other appliance. In one example, a conventional washing machine typically utilizes an electric motor coupled to a belt drive to spin the washer drum. In contrast, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may be axially coupled to the washer drum, providing a direct drive configuration and eliminating the belt drive element. Alternatively, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine, for example one comprising a partial stator, may be coupled to a rotor. The rotor may have a common axis as the washer drum. The rotor may also be coupled directly to the washer drum and/or integrally formed therefrom. In this manner, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may provide rotational force for a washing machine or other similar electromechanical structures and/or systems.

Moreover, in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized to provide mechanical output to relatively lightweight vehicles such as bicycles, scooters, motorcycles, quads, golf carts, or other vehicles. Additionally, a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized in small engine applications, for example portable generators, power tools, and other electrical equipment. A transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may desirably be utilized to provide mechanical output to propeller-driven devices, for example boats, airplanes, and/or the like. A transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may also desirably be utilized in various machine tools, for example rotating spindles, tables configured to move large masses, and/or the like. In general, transverse flux machines and/or commutated flux machines may be utilized to provide electrical and/or mechanical input and/or output to and/or from any suitable devices.

In accordance with various exemplary embodiments, exemplary transverse flux and/or commutated flux machines are configured to accommodate polyphase input and/or produce polyphase output. Polyphase input and/or output devices can have various advantages compared to single-phase devices. For example, polyphase motors may not require external circuitry or other components in order to produce an initialing torque. Polyphase devices can also avoid pulsating and/or intermittency, for example pulsating and/or intermittency caused when current produced by a single phase device passes through the part of its cycle in which the current has zero amplitude. Instead, polyphase devices can deliver substantially constant power output over each period of an alternating current input, and vice versa.

Polyphase devices can be produced using layouts similar to single phase layouts disclosed in various co-pending applications incorporated by reference herein. Polyphase devices can also be produced using layouts having single rotor/stator sets, or layouts having polyphase features that differ from single phase rotor/stator layouts. Moreover, polyphase devices can be produced in any suitable configurations, as desired.

Although exemplary embodiments shown herein generally have magnets on a rotor portion and flux switches on a stator portion, it should be noted that other variations may be made in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure. For example, flux switches may be mounted onto a rotor portion, and a series of magnets may be mounted onto a stator portion. Alternatively, flux switches can be mounted onto a rotor portion and an electromagnet can be mounted onto a stator portion. Numerous other relationships between a stator portion and a rotor portion are also possible. For example, either a stator portion or a rotor portion may be mounted as an exterior-most component. Moreover, magnets, flux concentrators, and/or flux switches may be arranged, configured, and/or coupled in order to conduct magnetic flux in such a way as to either generate electrical output or to drive the rotor. In addition, flux switches, flux concentrators, coils, and/or magnets can be mounted to either of a rotor portion or a stator portion.

In general, certain exemplary polyphase devices may be constructed by combining, linking, and/or otherwise utilizing and/or including suitable elements of single-phase devices. In an exemplary embodiment and with reference now to FIG. 5A, a single phase device 500A comprises rotor 550, a stator 510, and a coil 520. Single phase device 500A is illustrated here in cross section showing a transverse flux machine. In this exemplary embodiment, rotor 550 is cavity engaged with stator 510 in an axial gap configuration. Stator 510 partially surrounds coil 520.

In an exemplary embodiment, stator 510 is held stationary and rotor 550 rotates about an axis of rotation 551. It will be readily appreciated that in various other exemplary configurations, rotor 550 may be held stationary, so as to act as a stator. In these embodiments, stator 510 may be moved, so as to act as a rotor.

In various embodiments, rotor 550 comprises a stack of alternating magnet and flux concentrating portions.

With reference now to FIG. 5B, in various exemplary embodiments a polyphase design may be constructed by duplicating one or more portions of a single-phase design. In an exemplary embodiment, polyphase device 500B comprises three rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 500C placed concentrically around a common axis of rotation

In various exemplary embodiments, polyphase device 500B comprises any suitable number of rotors and/or stators, for example two rotors, four rotors, five rotors, and so on. Moreover, rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C can be capable of independent rotation. Alternatively, rotors portions 550A, 550B, and 550C can be coupled to one another, such that rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C rotate together.

In certain exemplary embodiments, rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C are very similar in design or even identical, as illustrated in FIG. 5B. In other exemplary embodiments, one or more of rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C may be smaller than others. In yet other exemplary embodiments, rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C differ from one another.

In various exemplary embodiments, a rotor portion 550 (e.g., one or more of 550A, 550B, or 550C) has a cross sectional shape. For example, a rotor portion 550 may have a wedge shape. Alternatively, the rotor portions 550 may comprise various other suitable shapes, for example an arrow-head shape, a circular cross sectional shape, a rectangular cross-sectional shape, and/or the like.

In various embodiments, rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C, when assembled into an electrically driven device and/or electrical output device, each comprise a stack of alternating magnet and flux concentrating portions.

In various exemplary embodiments, each rotor portion 550A, 550B, 550C of polyphase device 500B corresponds to a coil 520a, 520B, and 520C, respectively. Coils 520A, 520B, and 520C are typically oriented circumferentially about the center of polyphase device 500B. Generally, coils 520A, 520B, and 520C are fixed to the corresponding stator portion and thus do not rotate with rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C. In addition, stator portions 510A, 510B and 510C corresponding to each rotor are occupy at least a portion of the space between coils 520A, 520B, and 520C. In an exemplary embodiment, rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C rotate independently of stator portions 510A, 510B and 510C, which generally remain fixed.

Alternatively, rotor portions 550A, 550B, 550C can remain fixed so as to be the stator portion. In these embodiments, coils 520A, 520B, and 520C as well as stator portions 510A, 510B and 510C are rotated with respect to the rotor portions.

With reference now to FIG. 5C, in various exemplary embodiments, rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C of FIG. 5B are configured with a phase lag among rotor portions 510A, 510B and 510C. Magnet portions 554A, 554B and 554C are located on each of rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C, respectively. Moreover, multiple magnet portions 554A, 554B and 554C are located on each of rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C. For example, each rotor portion may comprise a pattern of alternating magnets and flux concentrating portions. With reference to FIG. 5D, for example, rotor 550 comprises a pattern of alternating magnets 554 and flux concentrating portions 552 and 556. This pattern may be repeated about the circumference of a rotor portion 550 so as to at least partially form the shape of a rotor portion 550.

In an exemplary embodiment, each of the magnet portions 554 on each of the rotors 550 is located between two flux conducting portions. For example, a particular magnet 554 is located between flux conducting portion 552 and 556. In general, magnets 554 may be arranged such that magnet surfaces having a common polarity engage a common flux concentrating portion (see, e.g., FIG. 5D). Moreover, in various exemplary embodiments a magnet portion 554 may be located adjacent additional and/or fewer flux conducting portions, as desired.

With reference again to FIG. 5C, in various exemplary embodiments rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C are partially rotated with respect to one another. In this manner, a phase lag p is defined between rotor portions 550A and 550B. Similarly, a phase lag p2 is defined between rotor portions 550B and 550C. Moreover, additional rotors 550 may be utilized to create additional phase lags, as desired.

Rotor portions 550A, 550B and 550C may be fixed relative to one another. In this manner, phase lags p1 and p2 are maintained as rotor portions 550A, 550B and 550C turn while in operation. Phase lags p1 and p2 cause each of rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C to produce a different phase of output. Moreover, rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C may also be movable with respect to one another in order to vary one or more phase lags.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, phase lags p1 and p2 illustrated in FIG. 5C are merely representative. Numerous other phase lags and/or combinations of the same may be created in accordance with principles of the present disclosure. All such phase lags and/or resulting device input and/or output characteristics are considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.

In an exemplary embodiment, polyphase device 500B may be operated as an electrical output device. In these configurations, each of rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C generates an alternating electrical output (for example, a substantially sinusoidal output) in corresponding coils 520A, 520B, and 520C. The electrical output of each coil 520A, 520B, and 520C has a phase that is shifted by a phase lag relative to each of the other coils 520A, 520B, and 520C (alternatively, advanced relative to each of the other coils 520A, 520B, and 520C). In general, the number of phase lags in polyphase device 500B may be up to one less than the number of rotor portions. For example, three rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C may be configured to create two phase lags. Three rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C may also be configured to create one phase lag (for example, if rotor portions 550B and 550C are aligned similarly with respect to rotor portion 550A). Three rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C may also be configured to create no phase lag when all three rotor portions 550A, 550B, and 550C are aligned similarly to one another. In general, any suitable number of phase lags, and any suitable magnitude of phase lags, may each be utilized, as desired.

For example, in various exemplary embodiments, in polyphase device 500B, the magnitude of each phase lag may be adjusted by adjusting the relative rotational alignment of each of the rotor portions 550. Polyphase device 500B may be operated as an electrical output device. In these configurations, phase outputs may be shifted evenly relative to each other within each period of the alternating output. For example, in a three-phase arrangement, the phases can be shifted relative to each other by one-third of the period. Alternatively, the phases can be shifted unevenly with respect to one another. For example, a second phase may be shifted 30 degrees with respect to a first phase. A third phase may be shifted by 60 degrees with respect to the second phase (and consequently, shifted by 90 degrees with respect to the first phase). Additional phases may similarly be shifted by any suitable value, as desired.

In various exemplary embodiments, in polyphase device 500B each phase output is produced by a different rotor portion 550A, 550B, and 550C and corresponding stator 510A, 510B, and 510C and coil 520A, 520B, and 520C. In other exemplary embodiments, polyphase device 500B is configured with a single stator portion 510 divided into separate phases sharing one or more rotors. In these exemplary embodiments, the number of components of the polyphase device may be reduced. For example, the polyphase device may produce and/or utilize more input/output phases than the number of rotors comprising the polyphase device. Further, in these exemplary embodiments the size the polyphase device may be reduced, for example by reducing a thickness of the polyphase device in at least a direction parallel to the axis of rotation of a rotor.

For example, with reference now to FIGS. 6A and 6B, a polyphase device 600 may be configured, with one or more interior stators. As used herein, an “interior stator” refers to a stator having a portion thereof and/or various components thereof disposed substantially between two or more rotors. In various exemplary embodiments, polyphase device 600 comprises three stators each comprising a plurality of flux conducting portions 612 (shown as 612A, 612B, and 612C). Polyphase device 600 further comprises three coils 620A, 620B, 620C, and two rotors 650X, 650Y. Flux conducting portions 612A, 612B, and 612C, and coils 620A, 620B, and 620C are located substantially between rotors 650X and 650Y.

Coils 620A, 620B, and 620C may each correspond to a different output phase. In various exemplary embodiments, spacing between flux conducting portions 612 within stators 610 is configured to create one or more phase relationships, as discussed below. In addition, polyphase device 600 may comprise any suitable number of coils 620, for example two coils 620, four coils 620, ten coils 620, and/or the like. Accordingly, polyphase device 600 may be configured with a number of output phases up to the number of coils 620 and corresponding phase portions of one or more stators and/or rotors. Additionally, multiple coils 620 may be configured to correspond to a similar phase.

Coils 620A, 620B, and 620C can comprise any suitable material configured to conduct electrical current responsive to a changing magnetic field, for example copper wire windings. In various exemplary embodiments, one or more coils 620 are wound from flat wire (i.e., wire having a rectangular cross section, as opposed to a circular cross section). Moreover, any of the coils, output windings, electrical connectors, and/or the like contemplated by this disclosure and/or in related disclosures, as suitable, can be fabricated from flat wire. Flat wire in a coil 620 allows more efficient filling of available space with conductive material. In this manner, a higher packing density of wire in the coil may be achieved. Efficiency gains from the increased packing density can outweigh potential disadvantages, for example the resulting increased weight of a particular coil. Moreover, any suitable material and/or shape of wire and/or coil may be used.

In various exemplary embodiments, with continued reference to FIG. 6B, each of the coils 620A, 620B, and 620C of polyphase device 600 comprises a loop with a forward portion, 620AF, 620BF, 620CF, and a rear portion, 620AR, 620BR, 620CR, respectively. Each of the forward and rear portions of coils 620A, 620B, and 620C of the polyphase device 600 is substantially surrounded by flux conducting portions 612 of corresponding stators such that magnetic flux can be conducted around coils 620A, 620B, and 620C.

In various exemplary embodiments, coils 620A, 620B, and 620C extend along a portion of a circumference of a circle. Coils 620A, 620B, and 620C may extend any suitable portion of a circumference of a circle, for example approximately one-third of the circumference. Coils 620A, 620B, and 620C may extend along portions having similar length. Moreover, coils 620A, 620B, and 620C may extend along portions having dissimilar lengths, as desired.

Moreover, forward portion 620AF may define a first arc, for example a semicircular arc, and rear portion 620AR may define a second arc, for example a semicircular arc. The first and second arcs may have a common radius from a common axis, for example a rotational axis of a transverse flux and/or commutated flux machine. Moreover, the first and second arcs (and/or forward portion 620AF and rear portion 620AR) may traverse a similar angular portion of a transverse flux machine. For example, in an exemplary three-phase embodiment, approximately 0° to 120° of the transverse flux machine is associated with a first coil (i.e. with a first and second portion of the first coil), approximately 120° to 240° of the transverse flux machine is associated with a second coil and its respective first and second portions, and approximately 240° to 360° of the transverse flux machine is associated with a third coil and its respective first and second portions. Moreover, the first and second arcs, (and/or forward portion 620AF and rear portion 620AR) may traverse overlapping angular portions of a transverse flux machine. For example, forward portion 620AF may traverse approximately 0° to 120° of the transverse flux machine, and rear portion may traverse approximately 5° to 115° of the transverse flux machine; thus, the angular portions are entirely overlapping. Additionally, the first and second arcs, (and/or forward portion 620AF and rear portion 620AR) may traverse partially overlapping angular portions of a transverse flux machine. For example, forward portion 620AF may traverse approximately 0° to 120° of the transverse flux machine, and rear portion 620AR may traverse approximately 5° to 125° of the transverse flux machine; thus, the angular portions are partially overlapping.

Conduction of flux through the flux conducting portions 612 about each of coils 620A, 620B, and 620C is able to produce an electrical output in each of coils 620A, 620B, and 620C. In various exemplary embodiments, flux is conducted through flux conducting portions 612A such that flux conducting portions 612A substantially surrounding forward portion 620AF are in phase with flux conducting portions 612A substantially surrounding rear portion 620AF. In this manner, forward portion 620AF and rear portion 620AR are in phase. Similar phase arrangements may be found in portions 620BF and 620CF, and 620BR and 620CR, respectively. In other exemplary embodiments, a forward portion may be out of phase with a corresponding rear portion.

Moreover, in various exemplary embodiments, a coil, for example coil 620A, may be oriented about a rotational axis of polyphase device 600 such that current in forward portion 620AF flows in a direction of rotation simultaneously with current in rear portion 620AR flowing opposite the direction of rotation. Stated another way, in various embodiments, current within coil 620A may be considered to flow around a somewhat “racetrack”-shaped loop extending only a portion of the angular distance around the rotational axis.

As will be readily appreciated, coils 620B and/or 620C may be shaped, sized, aligned, configured and/or may otherwise function and/or behave in a manner similar to coil 620A and portions thereof as described above.

In various exemplary embodiments, with continued reference to FIG. 6B, the flux conducting portions of polyphase device 600 can be C-shaped. Alternatively, the flux conducting portions can have one of a number of other shapes, for example U-shapes, rectilinear shapes, ovular shapes and linear shapes, in either cross-section or perspective, as desired. These flux conducting portions may be formed in any suitable manner. For example, the flux conducting portions can be fashioned from tape-wound torroid material, material including metallic glasses, laminated steel, powdered metal, or combinations of a number of these or other suitable flux conducting materials.

In an exemplary embodiment, with continued reference to FIG. 6B, the intra-coil flux conductor spacings S610A, S610B, and S610C (S610B and S610C not shown) (i.e., the spacings between adjacent flux conducting portions 612A, 612B, and 612C, respectively) are approximately uniform size. In addition, the spacing between adjacent flux conducting portions with respect to the forward portions 620AF, 620BF, and 620CF and rear portions 620AR, 620BR, and 620CR, of each of the coils are generally about the same size. However, the intra-coil flux conductor spacings S610A, S610B, and S610C on either and/or both the forward portions 620AF, 620BF, and 620CF and rear portions 620AR, 620BR, and 620CR of each of the coils can be other than approximately equal. For example, these flux conductor spacings may be varied in order to create different frequency outputs, or for other suitable purposes.

In contrast, with reference again to FIG. 6B, the inter-coil flux conductor spacings SA-B, SB-C, and SC-A (SC-A not shown) (i.e., the on-center spacings between adjacent flux conducting portions on adjacent coils 620A, 620B, and 620C), however, are generally unequal in size. In various exemplary embodiments, the inter-coil flux conductor spacings vary in order to set a particular phase relationship among the phases of the electrical output generated in each of coils 620A, 620B, and 620C. These phase relationships among coils and their association with various components of the rotors will be discussed in more detail below. However, in certain cases, it may be advantageous to have one or more of the inter-core flux conductor spacings SA-B, SB-C, and SC-A be approximately equal to another.

With reference now to FIG. 6C, a close-up view of a polyphase device 600 is illustrated. In an exemplary embodiment, the two rotor portions 650X, 650Y in polyphase device 600 are at least partially received within flux conducting portions 612 comprising stators 610. Rotor portions 650X, 650Y may be very similar and/or identical. Additionally, rotor portions 650X, 650Y may have a similar construction to rotors used in single phase devices. In various exemplary embodiments, rotor portions 650X, 650Y are generally aligned with one another.

Alternatively, rotor portions 650X, 650Y can have substantial differences. For example, rotor portions 650X, 650Y may be at least partially rotated relative to one another. Stated another way, rotor portions 650X, 650Y may be unaligned. Rotor portions 650X, 650Y may also have different sized alternating magnet portions 654 and/or flux concentrators 652.

In various exemplary embodiments, alternating magnet portions 654 and flux concentrators 652 are similar in features and functions to the corresponding regions 554 and 552/556, respectively, of rotor 550 as illustrated in FIG. 5D.

Moreover, in these embodiments rotor portions 650X, 650Y may be substantially similar to the rotors 550 used in polyphase device 500B. For example, like the magnet portions 554 of a rotor 550 illustrated in FIG. 5D, adjacent magnet portions 654 of rotor portion 650X may generally have alternating polar orientations. Similarly, adjacent magnet portions 654 of rotor portion 650Y may generally have alternating polar orientations. In other exemplary embodiments, however, alternate versions of rotor portion 650X may be utilized, for example wherein the poles of adjacent magnet portions 654 within rotor 650X are aligned rather than alternating. Similar alternate versions of rotor portion 650Y may be utilized. Moreover, all such combinations of alternating and/or aligned magnets are considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.

In various exemplary embodiments, polyphase device 600 may be operated to generate electrical output from mechanical input. In other exemplary embodiments, polyphase device 600 may be operated in a substantially reverse manner, wherein electrical input is supplied to one or more coils in order to create mechanical output and/or other output (for example, turning of one or more rotors and/or mechanical components attached thereto). It will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that various principles may be applied to either and/or both of these configurations, as suitable.

In an exemplary embodiment, in order to generate electrical output from mechanical input, rotor portions 650X, 650Y spin relative to flux conducting portions 612A along the direction D1 shown in FIG. 6B. This causes magnet portions 654 and flux concentrators 652 of rotor portions 650X, 650Y to alternately align with flux conducting portions 612A. In this manner, flux is conducted along the flux conducting portions 612A.

In an exemplary embodiment, orientation of successive magnet poles of each of magnet portions 654 is such that each flux conducting portion 652 is at least partially surrounded by the same polarity of an abutting pair of magnet portions 654. This orientation creates a flux path from a first flux concentrator 652, through a flux conductor 612A, to a second flux concentrator 652 different from the first flux concentrator 652. In polyphase device 600 these flux paths encircle sections of coils 620A surrounded by flux conducting portions 612A. Rotating rotor portions 650X, 650Y successively moves flux concentrators 652 having opposing polarities near the flux conducting portions 612A. Thereby, rotating rotor portions 650X, 650Y substantially reverses the direction of the flux path with each sequential passing of flux concentrators 652 and flux conducting portions 612A relative to one another. This process creates alternating electrical output in coils 620A. Similar behavior and results may be simultaneously obtained in each of flux conducting portions 612B and 612C, and coils 620B and 620C.

In various exemplary embodiments, inter-coil flux conductor spacings SA-B, SB-C, and SC-A are different than intra-coil flux conductor spacings S610A, S610B, and S610C. In these embodiments, magnet portions 654 and flux concentrators 652 of rotors 650X, 650Y are aligned with flux conducting portions 612 of different stator sections 610 at different times. As a result, maximum flux conductance along a flux conducting portion 612A occurs at a different time than for a flux conducting portion 612B, and so on. The timing is governed by inter-coil flux conductor spacings SA-B, SB-C, and SC-A. In this manner, inter-core flux conductor spacings SA-B, SB-C, and SC-A may create a phase lag in the electrical output generated in a particular coil 620, for example coil 620A, with respect to the electrical output generated in one or more of the other coils 620, for example coil 620B.

In an exemplary embodiment, with continued reference to FIG. 6C, inter-core flux conductor spacing SA-B is configured to create a 90° phase lag between the outputs of coils 620A and 620B. As illustrated, the inter-core flux conductor spacing SA-B is such that flux conducting portions 612A surrounding coil 620A are aligned with the flux concentrators 654 of rotor portions 650X, 650Y. At the same time, flux conducting portions 612B surrounding coil 620B are aligned with magnet portions 654 of rotor portions 650X, 650Y. In this position, coils 620A and 620B are about 90° out of phase with one another. Consequently, when there is maximum flux conductance in flux conducting portions 612A around coil 620A, minimum flux conductance occurs in flux conducting portions 612B around coil 620B, and vice versa. As can be appreciated, the reverse is also true. In this manner, an approximately 90° phase lag may be created between the electrical outputs generated in coils 620A and 620B by turning rotors 650X, 650Y.

FIG. 6C illustrates an inter-coil flux conductor spacing creating a 90° phase lag between adjacent coils. However, in various exemplary embodiments, any suitable phase relationship between adjacent coils may be obtained by adjusting the inter-coil flux conductor spacing. For example, a 180° phase lag between the output of adjacent coils 620A and 620B can be created. This can be achieved by adjusting inter-coil flux conductor spacing SA-B. Adjusting SA-B can cause flux conducting portions 612A surrounding coil 620A to align with flux concentrators 652 having a first polarity at a given time T. Adjusting SA-B can also cause flux conducting portions 612B surrounding a coil 620B to align, at about the same time T, with flux concentrators 652 having an opposite polarity. Such an orientation result in, at any given time, flux being conducted around adjacent coils 620A and 620B in opposing directions (e.g., flux is conducted in a generally clockwise direction around coil 620A, while at the same time flux is conducted in a generally counter-clockwise direction around coil 620B).

Similarly, adjusting SA-B can cause flux conducting portions 612A surrounding coil 620A to align with flux concentrators 652 having a first polarity at a given time T. Adjusting SA-B can also cause flux conducting portions 612B surrounding a coil 620B to align, at about the same time T, with flux concentrators 652 having the same polarity. In these configurations, coils 620A and 620B are substantially in phase. Moreover, in various exemplary embodiments, any suitable phase relationship between coils 620, for example coils 620A and 620B, may be achieved by configuring an inter-coil flux conductor spacing, for example SA-B.

Although exemplary relationships are shown and discussed for a phase lag between coils 620A and 620B, similar approaches apply to phase relationships between any coils within polyphase device 600. Stated another way, in various exemplary embodiments phase relationships between coils 620A, 620B, and 620C can be adjusted, varied, and/or otherwise modified and/or controlled by similarly adjusting one or more of inter-coil flux conductor spacings SA-B, SB-C, and/or SC-A as discussed above. Further, these inter-coil flux conductor spacings can be adjusted independently of one another. In this manner, any suitable number of phase relationships between coils 620A, 620B, and/or 620C of polyphase device 600 may be created.

Moreover, although FIGS. 6A-6C illustrate a polyphase device 600 wherein phase relationships are fixed once the stator is constructed, in other exemplary embodiment polyphase devices may be configured with adjustable phase relationships between adjacent coils. For example, flux conducting portions 612A may be moveable with respect to flux conducting portions 612B. All such polyphase devices having adjustable phase relationships are considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.

In various exemplary embodiments, with reference again to FIGS. 6B and 6C, flux conducting portions 612 associated with a particular coil 620 may be interleaved and/or otherwise placed and/or arranged in an alternating manner. For example, one flux conducting portion 612A partially encloses forward portion 620AF. Moving along direction D1, the next flux conducting portion 612A partially encloses rear portion 620AR. Continuing along direction D1, the next flux conducting portion 612A partially encloses forward portion 620AF, and so on in an alternating fashion. In this manner, flux conducting portions 612A may be placed more compactly and/or tightly. In various exemplary embodiments, flux conducting portions 612A may be arranged in an interleaved “back to back” configuration. In these arrangements, the “backs” of flux conducting portions 612A may extend at least partially past one another, for example as illustrated in FIG. 6C. In this manner, polyphase device 600 may be made more compact than if flux conducting portions 612A did not extend at least partially past one another. However, flux conducting portions 612A may also be arranged in an alternating “back to back” configuration where portions of adjacent flux conducting portions 612A do not extend past one another.

Similarly to the configurations discussed for flux conducting portions 612A above, flux conducting portions 612B, 612C, and/or other flux conducting portions of polyphase device 600 may be interleaved, interspersed, and/or otherwise alternated in a similar manner.

In addition to polyphase devices having an interior stator, principles of the present disclosure contemplate polyphase devices having an interior rotor. As used herein, an “interior rotor” refers to a rotor having a portion thereof and/or various components thereof disposed substantially between two or more stators. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, and with reference now to FIGS. 7A-7C, a polyphase device 700 is configured with an interior rotor 750. Polyphase device 700 further comprises three stators each comprising a plurality of flux conducting portions 712 (shown as 712A, 712B, and 712C). Polyphase device 700 further comprises three coils 720A, 720B, and 720C, located substantially within and/or surrounded by flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C, respectively. Rotor 750 is also located substantially within and/or surrounded by flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C.

In various exemplary embodiments, the arrangement of flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C within polyphase device 700 is substantially the inverse of the arrangement of flux conducting portions 612A, 612B, and 612C within polyphase device 600 (see, e.g., FIGS. 6A-6C), in the sense that orientation of each of flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C is reversed when compared to the orientation of flux conducting portions 612A, 612B, and 612C. In this manner, polyphase device 700 is configured to operate with a single rotor 750.

Polyphase device 700 may comprise multiple coils 720, for example coils 720A, 720B, and 720C. Coils 720A, 720B, and 720C may correspond to one or more output phases. In an exemplary embodiment, each coil 720A, 720B, and 720C corresponds to a different output phase. Any suitable number of coils 720 may be utilized. For example, three coils 720A, 720B, and 720C may be utilized, corresponding to three phase portions of polyphase device 700. Alternatively, two, four or more coils 720 may be used and, correspondingly, two, four or more stators. As can be appreciated, the number of phases within polyphase device 700 may range between one phase to a number of phases equal to the number of coils 720 present in polyphase device 700. In various exemplary embodiments, the spacing among flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C associated with coils 720A, 720B, and 720C, respectively, may be altered to create one or more phase relationships between them.

In various exemplary embodiments, functional relationships between various components of polyphase device 700, for example between coils 720A, 720B, and 720C and flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C, are substantially similar to relationships found in polyphase device 600. Additionally, sizes, shapes, geometries, and/or other characteristics of components of polyphase device 700 may be similar to those found in polyphase device 600. Moreover, the intra-coil spacing and inter-coil spacing of polyphase device 700 may similarly be varied to achieve multiple phases and/or phase relationships as disclosed hereinabove.

In contrast to the configuration of polyphase device 600, with further reference to FIG. 7C, in various exemplary embodiments each of coils 720A, 720B, and 720C of polyphase device 700 are configured with a “bridging” segment 722A, 722B, and 722C (722C not shown), respectively, at a junction between adjacent coils. In these embodiments, coil 720A further comprises bridging segment 722A. Similarly, coil 720B further comprises bridging segment 722B, and coil 720C further comprises bridging segment 722C. Bridging segments 722A and 722B are located at junction J1 between coils 720A and 720B. Bridging sections may be utilized in order to complete loops in coils, for example without occupying space desired for mechanical operation of rotor 750. Bridging sections may be placed over and/or under a rotor, as desired. In this manner, a rotor may be rotated without contacting a bridging segment.

Moreover, a bridging segment may be placed through magnets and/or flux concentrators, as desired. In various exemplary embodiments, a coil may be coupled to a group of magnets and flux concentrators, and bridging segments may pass therethrough. Flux switches at least partially enclosing the coil may then be rotated to generate output in the coil.

In various exemplary embodiments, polyphase device 700 may be operated in a manner at least partially similar to polyphase device 600. For example, polyphase device 700 may be operated to generated electrical output by providing a mechanical input to rotor 750. Polyphase device 700 may also be operated to generate mechanical output at rotor 750 responsive to electrical input in one or more coils 720. Moreover, polyphase device 700 may be configured with fixed phase relationships, for example by fixing flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C with respect to one another. Alternatively, polyphase device 700 may be configured with variable phase relationships, for example by allowing flux conducting portions 712A, 712B, and 712C to move relative to one another, as disclosed hereinabove.

In addition to polyphase devices having an interior rotor, principles of the present disclosure contemplate polyphase devices having “slim” designs. As used herein, “slim” refer generally to configurations that reduce a dimension of a polyphase device, for example configurations wherein coil paths are substantially orthagonal to the axis A of the polyphase device, configurations wherein multiple rotors share a common rotational plane, and/or the like.

For example, in an exemplary embodiment and with reference now to FIG. 8A, a polyphase device 800 is configured with a slim design. Polyphase device 800 comprises three stators each comprising a plurality of flux conducting portions 812 (shown as 812A, 812B, and 812C). Polyphase device 800 further comprises three coils 820A, 820B, and 820C. The paths defined by coils 820A, 820B, and 820C are generally orthagonal with the axis A of rotation of polyphase device 800 (shown coming out of the page as viewed in FIG. 8A). Polyphase device 800 further comprises one or more rotor portions 850 (not shown).

In an exemplary embodiment, coils 820A, 820B, and 820C correspond to three phases based on intra-coil flux conductor spacing and inter-coil flux conductor spacing as previously discussed. In other exemplary embodiments, coils 820A, 820B, and 820C correspond to two phases and/or one phase. Moreover, because the plane defined by coils 820A, 820B, 820C is substantially orthagonal to the axis A of polyphase device 800, polyphase device 800 may accordingly be formed to have a reduced or “slimmer” length along axis A. For example, polyphase device 800 may be formed to have a slimmer length along axis A than another design wherein a coil path is not orthogonal to axis A, but is rather substantially parallel to and/or at least partially traverses a distance parallel to axis A. Moreover, polyphase device 800 may slimmer than other designs having multiple rotors located at different points along axis A. Stated another way, in an exemplary embodiment, a first portion of a coil is in the same rotational plane as a second portion of that coil. In general, polyphase device 800 may be sized, shaped, and/or otherwise configured for use in various applications where a particular length along a rotational axis is desirable.

In various exemplary embodiments, with continued reference to FIG. 8C, each of the coils 820A, 820B, and 820C of polyphase device 800 comprises a loop with an inner portion, 820AI, 820BI, 820CI, and a outer portion, 820AO, 820BO, 820CO, respectively.

Moreover, outer portion 820AO may define a first arc, for example a first semicircular arc. Inner portion 820AI may define a second arc, for example a second semicircular arc. The first and second arcs are concentric about a common axis, for example a rotational axis of a transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine. The first and second arcs may also be co-planar.

In various exemplary embodiments, outer portions 820AO, 820BO, and 820CO extend along a portion of a circumference of a circle. Outer portions 820AO, 820BO, and 820CO may extend any suitable portion of a circumference of a circle, for example approximately one-third of the circumference. Outer portions 820AO, 820BO, and 820CO may extend along portions having similar length. Moreover, outer portions 820AO, 820BO, and 820CO may extend along portions having dissimilar lengths, as desired. Inner portions 820AI, 820BI, and 820CI may traverse angular distances approximately corresponding to angular distances traversed by outer portions 820AO, 820BO, and 820CO, respectively, for example identical angular distances. Alternatively, inner portions 820AI, 820BI, and 820CI may traverse different angular distances.

In various exemplary embodiments, functional relationships between various components of polyphase device 800, for example between coils 820A, 820B, and 820C and flux conducting portions 812A, 812B, and 812C, are substantially similar to relationships found in polyphase device 600. Additionally, sizes, shapes, geometries, and/or other characteristics of components of polyphase device 800 may be similar to those found in polyphase device 600. Moreover, an intra-coil flux conductor spacing and/or inter-coil flux conductor spacing of polyphase device 800 may similarly be varied to achieve multiple phases and/or phase relationships as disclosed hereinabove.

In various exemplary embodiments, polyphase device 800 may be operated in a manner at least partially similar to polyphase device 600. For example, polyphase device 800 may be operated to generated electrical output by providing a mechanical input to a rotor. Polyphase device 800 may also be operated to generate mechanical output at a rotor responsive to electrical input in one or more coils 820. Moreover, polyphase device 800 may be configured with fixed phase relationships, for example by fixing flux conducting portions 812A, 812B, and 812C with respect to one another. Alternatively, polyphase device 800 may be configured with variable phase relationships, for example by allowing flux conducting portions 812A, 812B, and 812C to move relative to one another, as disclosed hereinabove.

Further, in various exemplary embodiments, and with reference now to FIG. 8B, polyphase device 800 may be configured to reduce the amount of coil material at a junction between adjacent coils. In an exemplary embodiment, one or more bridging sections 822A, 822B, and 822C 822B complete coils 820A, 820B, and 820C, respectively. For example, bridging sections 822A and 822B complete coils 820A and 820B at junction J2. Bridging sections 822A, 822B, and 822C may be significantly thinner than corresponding bridging sections 722A, 722B, and 722C for polyphase device 700. For example, in an exemplary embodiment bridging sections 822A, 822B, and 822C are thinner in a “slim” configuration because bridging sections 822A, 822B, and 822C may not need to extend out of the plane of the main body of coils 820A, 820B, and 820C, respectively, for example in order to allow clearance for a rotor. In this manner, the amount of material utilized in coils 820A, 820B, and 820C may be desirably reduced. Because materials comprising coils 820A, 820B, and 820C are often heavy and/or expensive, and because materials comprising coils 820A, 820B, and 820C are prone to resistive heating and/or other losses, reducing the amount of material in coils 820A, 820B, and 820C may be advantageous. Moreover, because coil material comprising bridging sections 822A, 822B, and 822C is not at least partially surrounded by a corresponding flux conducting portion 812A, 812B, or 812C, this material is generally not generating useful output, but rather losses. Hence, this material may be considered to be somewhat similar to material in an “end turn” in a conventional motor, and as such may be suitably reduced and/or minimized, as desired.

In various exemplary embodiments, although no rotors are illustrated in FIGS. 8A and 8B, polyphase device 800 may accommodate a suitable number of rotors, for example two rotors, in order to allow interaction between the rotors and various portions of polyphase device 800. Moreover, polyphase device 800 may comprise any suitable number of rotors, as desired.

In addition to polyphase devices having slim designs, principles of the present disclosure contemplate polyphase devices wherein a first polyphase device is “nested” within another polyphase device, for example about a common axis. As used herein, a “nested” configuration refers to a single-phase and/or polyphase device surrounding another single-phase and/or polyphase device having a common axis. By utilizing a nesting configuration, the resulting combined polyphase device may be configured with an increased mechanical and/or electrical output potential for a particular device size.

For example, multiple nested polyphase devices may be connected to the same mechanical device, such as the drive shaft for a vehicle. In this way, in various exemplary embodiments a combined polyphase device can provide many times, for example three times, the output of an un-nested polyphase device, with essentially the same footprint. These configurations can be particularly advantageous for applications requiring a higher power output in a relatively compact and/or fixed space, for example motors for electric vehicles or other electric motors. Nested polyphase devices can also be used, for example, to derive a greater amount of electrical output from a similar amount of mechanical input. Such an approach enables more compact electrical generator designs, turbine designs, and/or designs for devices incorporating the same.

Moreover, although various exemplary nested devices discussed herein are polyphase devices, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that various single-phase devices, for example devices presented in various co-pending applications incorporated by reference herein, may be configured in a nested arrangement. Principles of the present disclosure may apply equally to such configurations, and all such applications, configurations, and/or nesting arrangements are considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.

Turning now to FIG. 9A, in an exemplary embodiment a nested polyphase device 900 comprises a first polyphase device 900A and a second polyphase device 900B. Second polyphase device 900B may be substantially similar to first polyphase device 900A. For example, second polyphase device 900B may be a scaled-down or smaller version of first polyphase device 900A. Alternatively, second polyphase device 900B may be configured with a design substantially different from first polyphase device 900A. Second polyphase device 900B is configured to be located at least partially within first polyphase device 900A.

In an exemplary embodiment, configuring second polyphase device 900B to be a scaled-down or smaller version of first polyphase device 900A is useful in order to preserve phase relationships between first polyphase device 900A and second polyphase device 900B. In other exemplary embodiments, phase relationships between first polyphase device 900A and second polyphase device 900B may be maintained, varied, and/or controlled by utilizing similarly sized components therein, but utilizing different stator component spacing, different rotor configurations, and/or the like.

In various exemplary embodiments, certain components of second polyphase device 900B and/or other components and/or features of polyphase device 900 are scaled down in size from similar components in first polyphase device 900A, for example by an approximately consistent scaling factor. For example, in an exemplary embodiment flux conducting portions 912B of second polyphase device 900B are approximately half the size of flux conducting portions 912A of first polyphase device 900A. Correspondingly, a spacing between adjacent flux conducting portions 912B on second polyphase device 900B may be approximately half that of a spacing between adjacent flux conducting portions 912A on first polyphase device 900A. Moreover, in order to maintain a desired phase relationship, a rotor utilized in second polyphase device 900B may be a scaled down version of a rotor utilized in first polyphase device 900A, for example a rotor scaled down by a similar factor. Thus, for example, magnet portions and flux concentrating portions of a rotor for second polyphase device 900B may be approximately half the size of magnet portions and flux concentrating portions of a rotor for first polyphase device 900A.

In various exemplary embodiments, a rotor for second polyphase device 900B is connected to the same mechanical input/output device as a rotor for first polyphase device 900A so as to operate in tandem. This arrangement can be advantageous, for example in applications with spatial restrictions. Moreover, these rotors may also be coupled to different mechanical devices, such that first polyphase device 900A and second polyphase device 900B may be utilized substantially independently.

Moreover, polyphase device 900 may comprise any suitable number of nested polyphase devices. In principle, an area comprising an interior section of a particular polyphase device may be substantially filled with one or more additional polyphase and/or single-phase devices in order to form polyphase device 900.

In various exemplary embodiments, a physical alignment may exist between like phase portions of a first polyphase device 900A and a second polyphase device 900B (see, e.g., FIG. 9A). In these embodiments, a coil 920A of first polyphase device 900A and a corresponding coil 920B of second polyphase device 900B are configured to correspond to approximately a same input/output phase. Moreover, corresponding coils (e.g., 920A and 920B) may be electrically connected so as to provide similar output or to receive a similar input. Alternatively, corresponding coils may be connected in other arrangements more suited for a particular implementation.

Additionally, polyphase device 900 may comprise a phase-staggered configuration. With reference now to FIG. 9B, in various exemplary embodiments polyphase device 900 comprises a first polyphase device 900A and a second, similar polyphase device 900B nested therein in a phase-staggered configuration. In these exemplary embodiments, similar phase portions of first polyphase device 900A and second polyphase device 900B, for example coils 920A and 920B, are staggered in order to increase a distance therebetween. In this manner, electrical interference between similar phase portions may be reduced. Moreover, interference between coils at junctions J2, J3 and J4 in first polyphase device 900A, and between coils at junctions J5, J6 and J7 in second polyphase device 900B may similarly be reduced. Additionally, phase staggering may reduce noise, vibration, and/or the like, for example by a mechanical pulse generated in one portion of the device corresponding to a similar mechanical pulse generated at approximately the same time on an opposite side.

In various exemplary embodiments, portions of first polyphase device 900A corresponding to approximately the same input/output phase as portions of second polyphase device 900B may be located on generally opposite sides of polyphase device 900. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, coils 920A and 920B correspond to approximately the same output phase. Coils 920A and 920B may be located approximately 180 rotational degrees away from one another about an axis of rotation of polyphase device 900. Stated another way, coils 920A and 920B may be located on generally opposite sides of polyphase device 900. In this manner, physical separation between corresponding phases may be maximized.

Moreover, various alternate configurations of any of the polyphase devices disclosed herein are within the scope of the present disclosure. For example, FIGS. 5A-5C illustrate axial gap configurations. Certain exemplary embodiments, including but not limited to those depicted therein, may alternatively be configured with radial gap configurations, as desired. In contrast, FIGS. 6A-6C, 7A-7C, 8A-8C, 9A-9B, and 10 illustrate radial gap configurations. Other exemplary embodiments, including but not limited to those depicted therein, may alternatively be configured with axial gap configurations, as desired.

Furthermore, FIGS. 5A-5B, 6A-6C, 7A-7C, 8A-8C, 9A-9B, and 10 illustrate cavity engaged configurations. Various exemplary embodiments, including but not limited to those depicted therein, may alternatively be configured with face engaged configurations, as desired. In contrast, FIG. 5C illustrates a face engaged configuration. Various other exemplary embodiments, including but not limited to those depicted therein, may also be configured with cavity engaged configurations, as desired.

Moreover, FIGS. 5A-10 illustrate transverse flux machine configurations. Various exemplary embodiments, including but not limited to those depicted therein, may alternatively be configured with commutated flux machine configurations.

For example, in various exemplary embodiments, a polyphase device may utilize a plurality of partial stators sharing a common rotor, for example a multipath rotor. In an exemplary embodiment, a polyphase device may comprise three partial stators sharing a common rotor, each partial stator corresponding to an input and/or output phase. Moreover, a polyphase device may comprise any suitable number of partial stators, as desired. Use of one or more partial stators may facilitate assembly and/or disassembly of a polyphase device.

Use of one or more partial stators may also facilitate scalable and/or modular polyphase devices, wherein partial stators may be added and/or removed, as desired. A partial stator may be added and/or removed in order to modify one or more properties of a polyphase device, for example a torque density, a power output, an input and/or output electrical waveform, and/or the like.

In various exemplary embodiments and in accordance with principles of the present disclosure, a polyphase device may be configured for use in a vehicle. For example, with momentary reference to FIG. 10, a polyphase device 1000 may be mounted on an axle of a wheel. In this manner, polyphase device 1000 may function as a direct drive hub motor.

In an exemplary embodiment, polyphase device 1000 may be similar to polyphase device 700 having an interior rotor. For example, polyphase device 1000 comprises at least two coils 1020A and 1020B, and a rotor 1050 disposed between portions of each of coils 1020A and 1020B. However, any suitable polyphase device may be utilized in a vehicle, and the exemplary embodiments presented herein are by way of illustration and not of limitation.

Principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with principles for stators in transverse flux machines and commutated flux machines, for example principles for partial stators and/or gapped stators, as disclosed in a co-pending U.S. Patent Application entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM STATOR CONCEPTS” having the same filing date as the present application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Principles of the present disclosure may also suitably be combined with principles for rotors in transverse flux machines and commutated flux machines, for example tape wound rotors and/or multipath rotors, as disclosed in a co-pending U.S. Patent Application entitled “TRANSVERSE AND/OR COMMUTATED FLUX SYSTEM ROTOR CONCEPTS” having the same filing date as the present application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Moreover, principles of the present disclosure may suitably be combined with any number of principles disclosed in any one of and/or all of the co-pending U.S. Patent Applications incorporated by reference herein. Thus, for example, a particular transverse flux machine and/or commutated flux machine may incorporate use of a tape wound rotor, use of a multipath rotor, use of a partial stator, use of a polyphase design, and/or the like. All such combinations, permutations, and/or other interrelationships are considered to be within the scope of the present disclosure.

While the principles of this disclosure have been shown in various embodiments, many modifications of structure, arrangements, proportions, the elements, materials and components, used in practice, which are particularly adapted for a specific environment and operating requirements may be used without departing from the principles and scope of this disclosure. These and other changes or modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure and may be expressed in the following claims.

In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to various embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the specification is to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Likewise, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to various embodiments. However, benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or element of any or all the claims. As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Also, as used herein, the terms “coupled,” “coupling,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a physical connection, an electrical connection, a magnetic connection, an optical connection, a communicative connection, a functional connection, and/or any other connection. When language similar to “at least one of A, B, or C” is used in the claims, the phrase is intended to mean any of the following: (1) at least one of A; (2) at least one of B; (3) at least one of C; (4) at least one of A and at least one of B; (5) at least one of B and at least one of C; (6) at least one of A and at least one of C; or (7) at least one of A, at least one of B, and at least one of C.

STATEMENTS OF INVENTION

An electrical machine, comprising: a conductive coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end, wherein the first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop, wherein a voltage is induced in more than 90% of the coil mass, and wherein the electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

An electrical machine, comprising: a first rotor having a first plane of rotation; a second rotor having a second plane of rotation parallel to and non-overlapping the first plane of rotation, wherein the first rotor and second rotor have a common rotational axis; and a stator at least partially enclosing a coil, wherein the stator is located substantially between the first rotor and the second rotor, wherein the stator engages the first rotor and the second rotor, and wherein the electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

An electrical machine, comprising: a conductive coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end, wherein the first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop; a first set of flux conductors at least partially enclosing the first coil portion, wherein the first set of flux conductors engage a first rotor; and a second set of flux conductors at least partially enclosing the second coil portion, wherein the second set of flux conductors engage a second rotor, wherein the first set and the second set are arranged back-to-back, and wherein the electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine. The first set and the second set are arranged in an alternating manner.

An electrical machine, comprising: a conductive coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end, wherein the first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop; and a rotor, wherein the first coil portion is located on a first side of the rotor, wherein the second coil portion is located on an opposite side of the rotor, wherein the first coil end and the second coil end extend from the first side of the rotor to the opposite side of the rotor to form the loop, and wherein the electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine. The first coil end may comprise a bridging segment traversing the rotor such that the rotor is between the bridging segment and an axis of rotation. The first coil end may comprise a bridging segment passing between the rotor and an axis of rotation. The electrical machine may be a polyphase machine. The electrical machine may further comprise a first set of flux conductors at least partially enclosing the first coil portion, wherein the first set of flux conductors engage a first side of the rotor, and a second set of flux conductors at least partially enclosing the second coil portion, wherein the second set of flux conductors engage a second side of the rotor different from the first side, and wherein the first side and the second side are separated by a rotational plane of the rotor.

An electrical machine, comprising: a rotor having a first side and a second side separated by a rotational plane of the rotor; a first set of flux conducting portions engaging the first side; a second set of flux conducting portions engaging the second side; and a coil at least partially enclosed by the first set of flux conducting portions and the second set of flux conducting portions, wherein the electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

A nested electrical machine, comprising: a first electrical machine and a second electrical machine having a common rotational axis, wherein the second electrical machine is disposed entirely within an inner radius of the first electrical machine, wherein the first electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine, and wherein the second electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine. The first electrical machine and the second electrical machine may differ in phase.

An electrical machine, comprising: a rotor; and a plurality of partial stators coupled to the rotor, wherein each partial stator of the plurality of partial stators corresponds to a different input/output phase, and wherein the electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

An electrical machine, comprising: a first rotor having a first radius; a second rotor having a second radius smaller than the first radius, the first rotor and the second rotor having a common rotational plane; a conductive coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end, wherein the first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop; wherein the first coil portion is at least partially enclosed by a first set of flux conductors, wherein the second coil portion is at least partially enclosed by a second set of flux conductors, wherein the first set of flux conductors engage only the first rotor, and wherein the second set of flux conductors engage only the second rotor.

Claims

1. An electrical machine, comprising:

a first conductive coil comprising a first coil portion, a second coil portion, a first coil end, and a second coil end,
wherein the first coil portion and the second coil portion are connected via the first coil end and the second coil end to form a loop,
wherein the first coil portion is at least partially enclosed by a first set of flux conductors,
wherein the second coil portion is at least partially enclosed by a second set of flux conductors,
wherein the first coil portion and the second coil portion traverse at least partially overlapping angular portions with respect to a rotational axis of the electrical machine, and
wherein the electrical machine is at least one of a transverse flux machine or a commutated flux machine.

2. The electrical machine of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of conductive coils, each similar to the first conductive coil.

3. The electrical machine of claim 2, wherein each conductive coil of the plurality of conductive coils corresponds to a different phase.

4. The electrical machine of claim 1, wherein the first conductive coil extends along only a portion of a circumference of a circle.

5. The electrical machine of claim 1, wherein the first coil portion defines a first semicircular arc, and wherein the second coil portion defines a second semicircular arc.

6. The electrical machine of claim 5, wherein the first arc and the second arc have a common radius from a rotational axis of the electrical machine.

7. The electrical machine of claim 5, wherein the first arc and the second arc are concentric and co-planar.

8. The electrical machine of claim 1, wherein the coil is oriented about the rotational axis such that current in the first coil portion flows in a direction of rotation simultaneously with current in the second coil portion flowing opposite the direction of rotation.

9. The electrical machine of claim 1, further comprising a first plurality of magnets alternatingly disposed between the first set of flux conductors to form a first partial stator.

10. The electrical machine of claim 9, further comprising a second plurality of magnets alternatingly disposed between the second set of flux conductors to form a second partial stator.

11. The electrical machine of claim 1, wherein the first coil portion and the second coil portion are in phase.

12. The electrical machine of claim 1, further comprising a multipath rotor configured to engage at least one of the first set of flux conductors or the second set of flux conductors.

13. The electrical machine of claim 1, further comprising an interior stator.

14. The electrical machine of claim 1, further comprising an interior rotor.

15. The electrical machine of claim 14, wherein the first coil end and the second coil end extend from a first side of the interior rotor to an opposite side of the interior rotor to form the loop.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
1361136 December 1920 Burke
2078668 April 1937 Kilgore
3403273 September 1968 Hiroshi
3437854 April 1969 Oiso
3558941 January 1971 Brebbia et al.
3700942 October 1972 Alth
3710158 January 1973 Bachle et al.
3774059 November 1973 Cox
4021691 May 3, 1977 Dukshtau et al.
4114057 September 12, 1978 Esters
4206374 June 3, 1980 Goddijn
4237396 December 2, 1980 Blenkinsop et al.
4363988 December 14, 1982 Kliman
4388545 June 14, 1983 Honsinger et al.
4459501 July 10, 1984 Fawzy
4501980 February 26, 1985 Welburn
4605874 August 12, 1986 Whiteley
4611139 September 9, 1986 Godkin et al.
4620752 November 4, 1986 Fremerey et al.
4658166 April 14, 1987 Oudet
4794286 December 27, 1988 Taenzer
4835840 June 6, 1989 Stokes
4850100 July 25, 1989 Stokes
4900965 February 13, 1990 Fisher
4959577 September 25, 1990 Radomski
5038066 August 6, 1991 Pawlak et al.
5051641 September 24, 1991 Weh
5097167 March 17, 1992 Kanayama et al.
5117142 May 26, 1992 von Zweygbergk
5130595 July 14, 1992 Arora
5132581 July 21, 1992 Kusase
5177054 January 5, 1993 Lloyd
5208503 May 4, 1993 Hisey
5212419 May 18, 1993 Fisher et al.
5250865 October 5, 1993 Meeks
5262746 November 16, 1993 Masuda
5278470 January 11, 1994 Neag
5289072 February 22, 1994 Lange
5306977 April 26, 1994 Hayashi
5382859 January 17, 1995 Huang et al.
5386166 January 31, 1995 Reimer et al.
5543674 August 6, 1996 Koehler
5543677 August 6, 1996 Fakler
5633551 May 27, 1997 Weh
5650680 July 22, 1997 Chula
5712521 January 27, 1998 Detela
5729065 March 17, 1998 Fremery et al.
5731649 March 24, 1998 Caamano
5773910 June 30, 1998 Lange
5777418 July 7, 1998 Lange et al.
5780953 July 14, 1998 Umeda et al.
5814907 September 29, 1998 Bandera
5886449 March 23, 1999 Mitcham
5889348 March 30, 1999 Muhlberger et al.
5894183 April 13, 1999 Borchert
5925965 July 20, 1999 Li et al.
5942828 August 24, 1999 Hill
5973436 October 26, 1999 Mitcham
5994802 November 30, 1999 Shichijyo et al.
6028377 February 22, 2000 Sakamoto
6043579 March 28, 2000 Hill
6060810 May 9, 2000 Lee et al.
6066906 May 23, 2000 Kalsi
6097126 August 1, 2000 Takura
6121712 September 19, 2000 Sakamoto
6133655 October 17, 2000 Suzuki et al.
6133669 October 17, 2000 Tupper
6154013 November 28, 2000 Caamano
6163097 December 19, 2000 Smith et al.
6177748 January 23, 2001 Katcher et al.
6181035 January 30, 2001 Acquaviva
6194799 February 27, 2001 Miekka
6229238 May 8, 2001 Graef
6232693 May 15, 2001 Gierer et al.
6236131 May 22, 2001 Schafer
6300702 October 9, 2001 Jack et al.
6365999 April 2, 2002 Muhlberger et al.
6445105 September 3, 2002 Kliman et al.
6448687 September 10, 2002 Higashino et al.
6455970 September 24, 2002 Shafer et al.
6472792 October 29, 2002 Jack et al.
6492758 December 10, 2002 Gianni et al.
6545382 April 8, 2003 Bennett
6603060 August 5, 2003 Ohashi et al.
6603237 August 5, 2003 Caamano
6657329 December 2, 2003 Kastinger et al.
6664704 December 16, 2003 Calley
6707208 March 16, 2004 Durham et al.
6717297 April 6, 2004 Sadarangani et al.
6750582 June 15, 2004 Neet
6774512 August 10, 2004 Takagi et al.
6794791 September 21, 2004 Ahmed et al.
6815863 November 9, 2004 Jack et al.
6849985 February 1, 2005 Jack et al.
6853112 February 8, 2005 Nakamura et al.
6867530 March 15, 2005 Gamm et al.
6879080 April 12, 2005 Caamano
6882077 April 19, 2005 Neet
6885124 April 26, 2005 Neet
6885129 April 26, 2005 Oohashi et al.
6924579 August 2, 2005 Calley
6940197 September 6, 2005 Fujita et al.
6949855 September 27, 2005 Dubois et al.
6979925 December 27, 2005 Schwamm
6989622 January 24, 2006 Chen et al.
7015603 March 21, 2006 Barrho et al.
7026737 April 11, 2006 Angerer et al.
7030529 April 18, 2006 Dommsch et al.
7030534 April 18, 2006 Caamano
7064469 June 20, 2006 Jack et al.
7067954 June 27, 2006 Kuribayashi et al.
7071593 July 4, 2006 Matsushita et al.
7126313 October 24, 2006 Dooley
7129602 October 31, 2006 Lange et al.
7135802 November 14, 2006 Seki et al.
7208856 April 24, 2007 Imai et al.
7211922 May 1, 2007 Isoda et a
7230361 June 12, 2007 Hirzel
7245055 July 17, 2007 Jack
7265472 September 4, 2007 Mitcham
7268456 September 11, 2007 Harada et al.
7358639 April 15, 2008 Caamano
7385329 June 10, 2008 Hill
7385330 June 10, 2008 Trzynadlowski et al.
7420312 September 2, 2008 Kitamura et al.
7466057 December 16, 2008 Imai et al.
7474030 January 6, 2009 Mitcham
7592735 September 22, 2009 Hamada
7602095 October 13, 2009 Kusase
7679253 March 16, 2010 Neet
20010001528 May 24, 2001 Ragaly
20010030479 October 18, 2001 Mohler
20020070627 June 13, 2002 Ward et al.
20020135242 September 26, 2002 Kawai
20030122439 July 3, 2003 Horst
20030122440 July 3, 2003 Horst
20040061396 April 1, 2004 Narita et al.
20040140730 July 22, 2004 Barrho et al.
20040145269 July 29, 2004 Barrho et al.
20040150288 August 5, 2004 Calley
20040189138 September 30, 2004 Jack
20040212267 October 28, 2004 Jack et al.
20040232799 November 25, 2004 Chen et al.
20040251759 December 16, 2004 Hirzel
20040251761 December 16, 2004 Hirzel
20040262105 December 30, 2004 Li et al.
20050006978 January 13, 2005 Bradfield
20050012427 January 20, 2005 Seki et al.
20050062348 March 24, 2005 Ohnishi et al.
20050121983 June 9, 2005 Ehrhart
20050156479 July 21, 2005 Fujita et al.
20050242679 November 3, 2005 Walter et al.
20060012259 January 19, 2006 Kerlin
20060012263 January 19, 2006 Smith et al.
20060082237 April 20, 2006 Kerlin
20060091755 May 4, 2006 Carlisle
20060131974 June 22, 2006 Sadarangani et al.
20060131986 June 22, 2006 Hsu et al.
20060192453 August 31, 2006 Gieras et al.
20060220477 October 5, 2006 Okumoto et al.
20060261688 November 23, 2006 Akita et al.
20070013253 January 18, 2007 Dubois et al.
20070046137 March 1, 2007 Ooiwa
20070046139 March 1, 2007 Ishizuka
20070075605 April 5, 2007 Enomoto et al.
20070138900 June 21, 2007 Imai et al.
20070152528 July 5, 2007 Kang et al.
20070176505 August 2, 2007 Trzynadlowski et al.
20080007126 January 10, 2008 Popov et al.
20080169776 July 17, 2008 Acker
20080211326 September 4, 2008 Kang et al.
20080265707 October 30, 2008 Bradfield
20080309188 December 18, 2008 Calley
20080315700 December 25, 2008 Ishikawa et al.
20090085415 April 2, 2009 Ionel et al.
20090243406 October 1, 2009 Jack et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
1513856 April 1969 DE
3626149 August 1986 DE
3602687 August 1987 DE
8711725 August 1987 DE
3927453 February 1991 DE
19634949 May 1998 DE
102006026719 June 2006 DE
0544200 November 1992 EP
0707374 April 1996 EP
0718959 June 1996 EP
0998010 March 2000 EP
1063754 December 2000 EP
1117168 July 2001 EP
1227566 July 2002 EP
518298 September 1938 GB
2052176 January 1986 GB
60241758 November 1985 JP
61042248 February 1986 JP
2001025197 January 2001 JP
10-2008-0061415 March 2008 KR
WO 93/14551 July 1993 WO
WO 99/34497 July 1999 WO
WO 02/075895 September 2002 WO
WO 2005/091475 September 2005 WO
WO 2007024184 March 2007 WO
WO 2009116935 September 2009 WO
WO 2009116936 September 2009 WO
WO 2009116937 September 2009 WO
Other references
  • Technical Project Presentation—Development of a High-Performance Generator for Wind Turbines—by Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski, PhD, University of Nevada, Reno, FIEEE, Aug. 2007.
  • “Magnetic Field Calculation of Claw Pole Permanent Magnet Machines Using Magnetic Network Method”: J. Elect. Electron. Eng., Australia, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 69-75, 2002.
  • “Iron Loss Calculation in a Claw-Pole Structure”, by A. Reinap et al., Lund University, June 2004.
  • Dubois, Maxine R. et al.; “Clawpole Transverse-Flux Machine with Hybrid Stator”; pp. 1-6, Jul. 15, 2006.
  • Fundamental Modeling for Optimal Design of Transverse Flux Motors—Genevieve Patterson et al., University of Tokyo, 2008.
  • Raser Technologies Company Brochure, 2005.
  • ISR and WO dated Jun. 10, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063145.
  • ISR and WO dated Jun. 10, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063142.
  • ISR and WO dated Jun. 18, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2009/063147.
  • Office Action dated May 19, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934.
  • Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 29, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/721,765.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 13, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,806.
  • Notice of Allowance dated May 30, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,238.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 3, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/679,806.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 13, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/721,765.
  • ISR/WO dated Aug. 15, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063301.
  • IPRP dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063301.
  • ISR/WO dated Aug. 20, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063236.
  • IPRP dated Nov. 17, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063236.
  • ISR/WO dated Oct. 24, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063336.
  • IPRP dated Nov. 17, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063336.
  • ISR/WO dated Aug. 15, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063287.
  • IPRP dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063287.
  • ISR/WO dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063268.
  • IPRP dated Nov. 10, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/063268.
  • Technical Project Presentation—Development of a High-Performance Generator for Wind Turbines—Final Report—University of Nevada, Reno—Feb. 2004.
  • “Applications of Power Electronics in Automotive Power Generation”,—by David J. Perreault et al., Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 21-22, 2006—Paris.
  • “Thermal Modeling of Lundell Alternators”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 20, No. 1, Mar. 2005.
  • “Permanent Magnet Assisted Synchronous Reluctance Motor Design and Performance Improvement”, —A Dissertation by Peyman Niazi, Texas A&M University, Dec. 2005.
  • “New Design of Hybrid—Type Self-Bearing Motor for Small, High-Speed Spindle”, —by Hideki Kanebako et al., IEEE/ ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 8, No. 1, Mar. 2003, retrieved Jan. 8, 2010.
  • “Evaluation of Rotor Conducting Screens on the Single-Phase Switched Reluctance Machine”, —by M.M. Mahmoud et al., School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, May 3, 2005.
  • “Analytical Interpretation and Quantification of Rotational Losses in Stator Cores of Induction Motors”, —IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2007, retrieved Jan. 8, 2010.
  • Hasubek, B.E. et al.; “Design Limitations of Reduced Magnet Material Passive Rotor Transverse Flux Motors Investigated Using 3D Finite Element Analysis”; 2000; pp. 365-369, retrieved Oct. 24, 2008.
  • Henneberger, G. et al.; “On the Parameters Computation of a Single Sided Transverse Flux Motor”; Workshop on Electrical Machines' Parameters, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, May 26, 2001; pp. 35-40.
  • Woolmer, MD, T.J., et al., “Analysis of the Yokeless and Segmented Armature Machine”, Electric Machines & Drives Conference, 2007. IEMDC apos; 07. IEEE International, May 3-5, 2007, pp. 704-708, vol. 1, Oxford University, Engineering Department, Parks Road, Oxford, UK.
  • Husband, S.M. et al.; The Rolls-Royce Transverse Flux Motor Development; Electric Machines and Drives Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 1435-1440, IEEE, 2003.
  • Theory of SR Motor Operation (Power Point Presentation), copyright 2002 by George Holling and Rocky Mountain Technologies Inc.
  • Development of a PM Transverse Flux Motor With Soft Magnetic Composite Core—IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 21, No. 2., Jun. 2006.
  • www.higenmotor.com/eng/aboutus/about06read.asp?id=notice&no=87 dated Jan. 15, 2010.
  • Lyng Eltorque QT 800-2.0 User Manual, version 1.0—dated Jul. 3, 2007.
  • Motors: Emerging Concepts by George Holling, Apr. 2007.
  • www.iem.rwth-aachen.de/index.pl/new materials and machines=makePrintable=1; retrieved Jan. 15, 2010.
  • Response to Office Action filed Jan. 15, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. JPPA-2003-548374.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931.
  • Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934.
  • Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 22, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,936.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935.
  • Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,931.
  • Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,733.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 12, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,728.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 8, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,934.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/149,935.
Patent History
Patent number: 7868508
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 3, 2009
Date of Patent: Jan 11, 2011
Patent Publication Number: 20100109453
Assignee: Motor Excellence, LLC (Flagstaff, AZ)
Inventors: David G. Calley (Flagstaff, AZ), Thomas F. Janecek (Flagstaff, AZ)
Primary Examiner: Thanh Lam
Attorney: Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
Application Number: 12/611,737
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Coils (310/208); Combined Permanent And Electromagnet (310/181); Bar Windings (310/201)
International Classification: H02K 3/04 (20060101);