Hybrid drill bit with high bearing pin angles

A hybrid drill bit having at least two rolling cutters, each rotatable around an axis of rotation, at least one of the rolling cutters having a high pin angle, and at least one fixed blade. The pin angle can encompass pin angles above 39 degrees to less than 393 degrees. The drill bit can allow the rolling cutters to engage a shoulder portion and/or gage portion of the bit profile and assist the fixed blade(s) in these areas. The at least two rolling cutters can be disposed at different pin angles.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Not applicable.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.

REFERENCE TO APPENDIX

Not applicable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The disclosure described herein generally relates to drill bits for use in drilling operations in subterranean formations. More particularly, the disclosure relates to hybrid bits, and the pin angle of rolling cutters in the hybrid bit in conjunction with fixed blades of the hybrid bit.

2. Description of the Related Art

Drill bits are frequently used in the oil and gas exploration and the recovery industry to drill well bores (also referred to as “boreholes”) in subterranean earth formations. There are two common classifications of drill bits used in drilling well bores that are known in the art as “fixed blade” drill bits and “roller cone” drill bits. Fixed blade drill bits include polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) and other drag-type drill bits. These drill bits typically include a bit body having an externally threaded connection at one end for connection to a drill string, and a plurality of cutting blades extending from the opposite end of the bit body. The cutting blades form the cutting surface of the drill bit. Often, a plurality of cutting elements, such as PDC cutters or other materials, which are hard and strong enough to deform and/or cut through earth formations, are attached to or inserted into the blades of the bit, extending from the bit and forming the cutting profile of the bit. This plurality of cutting elements is used to cut through the subterranean formation during drilling operations when the drill bit is rotated by a motor or other rotational input device.

The other type of earth boring drill bit, referred to as a roller cone bit, typically includes a bit body with an externally threaded connection at one end, and a plurality of roller cones (typically three) attached at an offset angle to the other end of the drill bit. These roller cones are able to rotate about bearings, and rotate individually with respect to the bit body.

An exemplary roller cone bit and cutting roller cone are illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,601,661, incorporated herein by reference. The roller cone bit 10 includes a bit body 12 having a longitudinal centerline 8 and having a threaded pin-type connector 14 at its upper end known as a “shank” for coupling the bit body 12 with the lower end of a drill string (not shown). The bit body 12 has generally three downwardly depending legs (two shown as legs 16, 18) with a lubricant compensator 20 provided for each. Nozzles 22 (one shown) are positioned between each of the adjacent legs to dispense drilling fluid during drilling. The drilling fluid is pumped down through the drill string and into a cavity (not shown) in the bit body 12. A roller cone is secured to the lower end of each of the three legs. The three roller cones 24, 25, and 26 are visible in FIG. 1 secured in a rolling relation to the lower ends of the legs of bit body 12.

The roller cone 24 has a cutter body 32 that is typically formed of suitably hardened steel. The cutter body 32 is substantially cone-shaped. A plurality of primary cutting elements 34, 36, 38 extend from the cutter body 32. When the cutter body 32 is rotated upon the spindle 28, the primary cutting elements engage earth within a borehole and crush it. The plurality of cutting elements may be one or a combination of milled steel teeth (called steel-tooth bits), tungsten carbide (or other hard-material) inserts (called insert bits), or a number of other formed and/or shaped cutting elements that are formed of materials having a hardness and strength suitable enough to allow for the deformation and/or cutting through of subterranean formations. In some instances, a hard facing material is applied to the exterior of the cutting elements and/or other portions of the roller cone drill bit, to reduce the wear on the bit during operation and extend its useful working life.

The roller cone 26 is rotatably retained by bearings 27 on a spindle 28 having a spindle base 29 that joins the roller cone leg 18. The spindle 28 has an axis of rotation 6 that is at some angle “α”, known as a “pin angle”. The pin angle is measured between the spindle axis of rotation 6 and a datum plane 7. The datum plane 7 is formed orthogonal to the longitudinal centerline 8 of the bit. The datum plane 7 intersects the spindle axis of rotation 6 near the spindle base 29, as illustrated in FIG. 1A. The plane 7 can be represented pictorially as a horizontal plane when the bit centerline 8 is vertical with the shank oriented upright and the cutters facing downwardly, as seen in FIG. 1A. The spindle base 29 is the region of the junction between the spindle 28 and the roller cone leg 18, and generally is located proximate to the intersection of the rear face 30 of the roller cone 26 and the spindle axis of rotation 6. The pin angle “α” is measured in a plane 9 that is orthogonal to the plane 7 and contains the spindle axis of rotation 6. The pin angle is measured in a counterclockwise direction from the datum plane 7 to the spindle axis of rotation 6 starting at the intersection of the plane 7 with the bit centerline 8, when viewed with the spindle 28 oriented to the right of a vertical centerline 8. The pin angle “α”, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, measures approximately 33 degrees. It should be noted that the axis of rotation 6 may not intersect the bit longitudinal centerline 8, if the bit has offset.

The pin angle from the plane 7 to the axis of rotation 6 of the roller cone can be generally from 33 degrees to 39 degrees, with 33 degrees to 36 degrees being customary. The pin angle is critical to establishing the intermeshing of the roller cones and their cutting elements. Further, the pin angle significantly affects the load on the rolling cone and its spindle for radial and thrust loads. Generally, a smaller pin angle, such as 33 degrees, will be used for softer cutting formations, where a smaller pin angle allows the cutting elements to have a greater projection outwardly for more engagement with the formation. A larger pin angle, such as 36 degrees, will generally be used for harder cutting formations, where the cutting elements have less projection into the formation. The pin angle further affects and is affected by roller cone bearing size, the number of rolling cones, projection length and shape of the cutting elements on the rolling cone, leg strength, roller cone diameter, shape of the rolling cone, and other factors. The pin angle is empirically picked and has been standardized between the above referenced angles of 33 degrees to 39 degrees with 33 degrees to 36 degrees being the most common. A small change can yield significant differences in the roller cone performance, and some pin angles are determined in increments of less than 1 degree.

These general classes of earth boring bits have limitations, particularly with the bit life and the types of subterranean formations through which they can drill. Fixed blade bits using PDC cutting elements, and therefore known as “PDC bits”, usually can be used with success in soft to medium-hard formations. Hard and/or abrasive formations are generally considered more challenging for PDC bits in that their use in such formations results in excessive wear and shortened working life. For example, mudstone and siltstone have been drilled well; however, sandstones, particularly if coarse-grained and cemented, are very difficult to drill economically and are highly destructive to fixed blade drill bits. [See, for example, Feenstra, R., et al., “Status of Polycrystalline-Diamond-Compact Bits: Part 1—Development” and “Part 2—Applications”, Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 40 (7), pp. 675-684 and 817-856 (1988).] Success is fully dependent on a good match between the bit, the formation to be drilled, and the operating conditions. Experience has shown that for fixed blade bits such as PDC bits, the type of mud, the bit hydraulics, and bit design may affect bit performance.

Repeated experience shows that a preferred practice is to develop the best bit design for a particular field rather than to select one from a range. Increased aggressiveness in earth-boring bits is not always desirable, because of the increase torque requirements that are generally associated with it. The ability to design and/or tailor a bit to a particular subterranean operation or application can be an invaluable tool for the bit designer. Thus, in recent years, attempts have been made to develop earth-boring drill bits that use a combination of one or more rolling cutters and one or more fixed blades having PDC or similarly abrasive cutting elements formed or bonded thereon. Some of these combination type bits are referred to as “hybrid drill bits”.

One previously described hybrid drill bit is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,343,371, “wherein a pair of opposing extended nozzle drag bit legs are positioned with a pair of opposed tungsten carbide roller cones. The extended nozzle face nearest the hole bottom has a multiplicity of diamond inserts mounted therein. The diamond inserts are strategically positioned to remove the ridges between the kerf rows in the hole bottom formed by the inserts in the roller cones. A cross section of the pilot pin and journal is not shown in the above patent, but is typically the same as a roller cone bit.

The typical practice heretofore has been to combine the fixed blades with a modified roller cone (herein a “rolling cutter”) using the same pin angles of a roller cone drill bit. The additional space used by the fixed blades requires that the size of the roller cones be reduced to fit with the blades. The size of the roller cones on a hybrid bit will generally be smaller than the cones on a roller cone bit of the same diameter. The reduced cone size may result in fewer cutting elements, smaller diameter cutting elements, reduced bearing diameter and length, and other compromises. Some unique drill bits vary from the standard pin angles, but appear to be limited to single fixed blade and single rolling cutters. These somewhat rare and special purpose drill bits are not constrained by the interrelationships of multiple fixed blades and multiple rolling cutters. Thus, the teachings of such unique drill bits are not transferable to a drill bit with multiple fixed blades and multiple rolling cutters.

There remains a need for an improved hybrid bit that can better optimize the interrelationships between the fixed blades and rolling cutters.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention disclosed and taught herein is directed to an improved hybrid drill bit having at least two rolling cutters, each rotatable around an axis of rotation, at least one of the rolling cutters having a high pin angle, and at least one fixed blade. The increase in the pin angle can encompass pin angles above 39 degrees to less than 393 degrees. In at least one embodiment, the improved drill bit expands the capabilities of a hybrid bit to allow the rolling cutters to engage a shoulder portion and/or gage portion of the bit profile and assist the fixed blade(s) in these areas. The pin angle can be increased to 90 degrees to a vertical position. At a pin angle above 90 degrees and below 270 degrees, the rolling cutter axis of rotation faces outwardly, away from the drill bit centerline. Above 270 degrees to below 360 degrees, the axis of rotation of the rolling cutter faces inward but in a direction away from the end of the drill bit. Above 360 degrees but less than 393 degrees, the axis of rotation faces inward and toward the end of the drill bit but in a shallower pin angle than heretofore used by hybrid bits.

The disclosure provides a hybrid drill bit for use in drilling through subterranean formations, the hybrid drill bit comprising: a shank disposed about a longitudinal centerline and adapted to be coupled to a drilling string; at least one fixed blade extending in the axial direction downwardly and coupled to the shank; at least one fixed cutting element arranged on the fixed blade; at least two rolling cutter legs coupled to the shank, each comprising an spindle having an axis of rotation; and at least two rolling cutters coupled to the rolling cutter legs distally from the shank and adapted to rotate about the axis of rotation at a pin angle greater than 39 degrees and less than 393 degrees.

The disclosure also provides a hybrid drill bit for use in drilling through subterranean formations, the hybrid drill bit comprising: a shank disposed about a longitudinal centerline and adapted to be coupled to a drilling string; at least one fixed blade extending in the axial direction downwardly and coupled to the shank; at least one fixed cutting element arranged on the fixed blade; at least two rolling cutter legs coupled to the shank, each comprising an spindle having an axis of rotation, the axis of rotation being at a pin angle greater than 39 degrees and less than 393 degrees.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The following figures form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these figures in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.

FIG. 1A illustrates a schematic side view of a typical roller cone bit.

FIG. 1B illustrates a schematic cross sectional side view of a typical roller cone.

FIG. 2A illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 2B illustrates a schematic top view of the exemplary hybrid bit of FIG. 2A.

FIG. 2C illustrates a schematic partial cross sectional side view of the exemplary hybrid drill bit of FIG. 2A.

FIG. 2D illustrates a schematic bottom view of the exemplary hybrid drill bit of FIG. 2A.

FIG. 3A illustrates a schematic bottom view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 3B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 3C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a pin angle.

FIG. 4A illustrates a schematic bottom view of another exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 4B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 4C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a high pin angle.

FIG. 5A illustrates a schematic bottom view of another exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 5B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 5C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a high pin angle.

FIG. 6A illustrates a schematic bottom view of another exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 6B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit.

FIG. 6C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a high pin angle.

While the invention disclosed herein is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, only a few specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The figures and detailed descriptions of these specific embodiments are not intended to limit the breadth or scope of the inventive concepts or the appended claims in any manner. Rather, the figures and detailed written descriptions are provided to illustrate the inventive concepts to a person of ordinary skill in the art and to enable such person to make and use the inventive concepts.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The Figures described above and the written description of specific structures and functions below are not presented to limit the scope of what Applicants have invented or the scope of the appended claims. Rather, the Figures and written description are provided to teach any person skilled in the art to make and use the inventions for which patent protection is sought. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that not all features of a commercial embodiment of the inventions are described or shown for the sake of clarity and understanding. Persons of skill in this art will also appreciate that the development of an actual commercial embodiment incorporating aspects of the present inventions will require numerous implementation-specific decisions to achieve the developer's ultimate goal for the commercial embodiment. Such implementation-specific decisions may include, and likely are not limited to, compliance with system-related, business-related, government-related and other constraints, which may vary by specific implementation, location and from time to time. While a developer's efforts might be complex and time-consuming in an absolute sense, such efforts would be, nevertheless, a routine undertaking for those of skill this art having benefit of this disclosure. It must be understood that the inventions disclosed and taught herein are susceptible to numerous and various modifications and alternative forms. Lastly, the use of a singular term, such as, but not limited to, “a,” is not intended as limiting of the number of items. Also, the use of relational terms, such as, but not limited to, “top,” “bottom,” “left,” “right,” “upper,” “lower,” “down,” “up,” “side,” and the like are used in the written description for clarity in specific reference to the Figures and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or the appended claims. The terms “couple,” “coupled,” “coupling,” “coupler,” and like terms are used broadly herein and may include any method or device for securing, binding, bonding, fastening, attaching, joining, inserting therein, forming thereon or therein, communicating, or otherwise associating, for example, mechanically, magnetically, electrically, chemically, directly or indirectly with intermediate elements, one or more pieces of members together and may further include without limitation integrally forming one functional member with another in a unity fashion. The coupling may occur in any direction, including rotationally.

FIG. 2A illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 2B illustrates a schematic top view of the exemplary hybrid bit bit of FIG. 2A. FIG. 2C illustrates a schematic partial cross sectional side view of the exemplary hybrid drill bit of FIG. 2A. FIG. 2D illustrates a schematic bottom view of the exemplary hybrid drill bit of FIG. 2A. The figures will be described in conjunction with each other. The hybrid drill bit 50 has a longitudinal centerline 52 that defines an axial center of the hybrid drill bit about which the drill bit can rotate. A shank 54 is formed on one end of the hybrid drill bit and is designed to be coupled to a drill string of tubular material (not shown) with threads according to standards promulgated for example by the American Petroleum Institute (API).

At least one fixed blade 58 (for example and without limitation, two fixed blades as shown) extends downwardly from the shank 54 relative to a general orientation of the bit inside a borehole. A plurality of fixed blade cutting elements 60, 62 are arranged and secured to a surface 63 on each of the fixed blades 58, such as at the leading edges of the hybrid drill bit relative to the direction of rotation. Generally, the fixed blade cutting elements 60, 62 comprise a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) layer or table on a rotationally leading face of a supporting substrate, the diamond layer or table providing a cutting face having a cutting edge at a periphery thereof for engaging the formation. The term PCD is used broadly and includes other materials, such as thermally stable polycrystalline diamond (TSP) wafers or tables mounted on tungsten carbide substrates, and other, similar superabrasive or super-hard materials, such as cubic boron nitride and diamond-like carbon. Fixed-blade cutting elements 60, 62 may be brazed or otherwise secured in recesses or “pockets” on each fixed blade 58 so that their peripheral or cutting edges on cutting faces are presented to the formation.

The hybrid drill bit 50 further includes at least two rolling cutter legs 64 and rolling cutters 72 coupled to such legs. The rolling cutter legs 64 extend downwardly from the shank 54 relative to a general orientation of the bit inside a borehole. Each of the rolling cutter legs 64 includes a spindle, such as a spindle 66a for a rolling cutter 72a shown in FIG. 3C, coupled at spindle base 68 to the legs' distal end, where the spindle is generally nominated by the element number 66. The spindle 66 has an axis of rotation 67 about which the spindle is generally symmetrically formed and the rolling cutter rotates, as described below. The axis of rotation 67 is generally disposed at a pin angle “α” of 33 degrees to 39 degrees based on the teachings and industry standard practices of roller cone drill bits discussed above, where the pin angle is measured starting at the plane 7 and ending at the axis of rotation 67 of the spindle 66, as the pin angle has previously been described in reference to FIG. 1A. In at least one embodiment, the axis of rotation 67 can intersect the longitudinal centerline 52. In other embodiments, the axis of rotation can be skewed to the side of the longitudinal centerline to create a sliding effect on the cutting elements as the rolling cutter rotates around the axis of rotation.

A rolling cutter 72 is generally coupled to each spindle 66. The rolling cutter 72 generally has an end 73 that in some embodiments can be truncated compared to a typical roller cone bit illustrated in FIG. 2. The rolling cutter 72 is adapted to rotate around the spindle 66 when the hybrid drill bit 50 is being rotated by the drill string through the shank 54. Generally, a plurality of cutting elements 74, 75 is coupled to a surface 77 of the rolling cutter 72. At least some of the cutting elements are generally arranged on the rolling cutter 72 in a circumferential row thereabout. A minimal distance between the cutting elements will vary according to the application and bit size, and may vary from rolling cutter to rolling cutter, and/or cutting element to cutting element. Some cutting elements can be arranged “randomly” on the surface of the rolling cutter. The cutting elements can include tungsten carbide inserts, secured by interference fit into bores in the surface of the rolling cutter, milled- or steel-tooth cutting elements having hard faced cutting elements integrally formed with and protruding from the surface of the rolling cutter, and other types of cutting elements. The cutting elements may also be formed of, or coated with, superabrasive or super-hard materials such as polycrystalline diamond, cubic boron nitride, and the like. The cutting elements may be chisel-shaped as shown, conical, round, or ovoid, or other shapes and combinations of shapes depending upon the application.

One or more sealed or unsealed bearings (not shown) can help secure the rolling cutter 72 to the spindle 66 and/or provide a contact length along the axis of rotation that can assist the rolling cutter in being rotated about the spindle to support radial and thrust loadings. The rolling cutter 72 generally includes one or more seals (not shown) disposed between the spindle 66 and an inside cavity of the rolling cutter, such as elastomeric seals and metal face seals. Other features of the hybrid drill bit such as back up cutters, wear resistant surfaces, nozzles that are used to direct drilling fluids, junk slots that provides a clearance for cuttings and drilling fluid, and other generally accepted features of a drill bit are deemed within the knowledge of those with ordinary skill in the art and do not need further description.

Having described the general aspects of the hybrid drill bit, the focus returns to the spindle and the pin angle.

FIG. 3A illustrates a schematic bottom view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 3B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 3C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a pin angle. The figures will be described in conjunction with each other.

The exemplary hybrid bit 50 includes a shank 54 and multiple fixed blades 58a, 58b, 58c (generally “58”) that are interrelated to multiple rolling cutters 72a, 72b, 72c (generally “72”). The rolling cutters 72 are each rotationally coupled to a spindle, such as spindle 66a, and can rotate about their respective axes of rotation 67a, 67b at respective pin angles “α”. The cutting elements 74, 75 of the rolling cutter 72 crush and pre- or partially fracture subterranean materials in a formation in the highly stressed portions, assisting the cutting elements 60, 62 of the fixed blade 58. As shown in FIG. 3C for a hybrid drill bit, the cutting elements 62 of the fixed blade 58 and the cutting elements 74, 75 of the rolling cutter 72 combine to define a congruent cutting face in a hybrid drill bit cutting profile 78.

The cutting profile 78 of the hybrid bit can be divided into several regions: a generally linear cutter region 80 extending radially outward from the longitudinal axis 52; a nose region 82 that is curved at a selected radius and defines the leading portion of the bit; and a shoulder region 84 that is also curved at a selected radius and connects the nose region to a gage region 86 of the bit. The selected radii in the nose region 82 and shoulder region 84 may be the same (a single radius) or different (a compound radius). The fixed blade 58 configuration primarily controls the cutting profile 78 through the cutting effects of the fixed blade cutting elements. The cutting effects of the rolling cutter can be combined with the cutting effects of the fixed blade to assist the fixed blade primarily in the nose region 82, and partially in the shoulder region 84. The fixed blade cutting elements 60 can ream out the borehole wall in the gage region 86.

The pin angle, along with other factors such as length and placement of the cutting elements and rolling cutter diameter, can significantly affect the cutting profile and interrelationships with the fixed blade cutting elements. It is known to the inventors that pin angles between 33 and 36 degrees have been used for hybrid bits with multiple rolling cutters and at least one fixed blade disposed between the rolling cutters, given the historical usage of pin angles between 33 and 39 degrees for roller cone drill bits having multiple roller cones.

However, with hybrid bits having multiple rolling cutters, the inventors have realized that other pin angles can be used that are normally constrained to between about 33 degrees to 39 degrees based on decades of determination and design of roller cone bits. While the industry has widely accepted such roller cone bit constraints as applicable to hybrid bits with multiple rolling cutters and limited the pin angles in the hybrid bits, the inventors have realized that the hybrid bits can be modified to nonconventional pin angles that outside the normal range of accepted practice for roller cone bits having multiple roller cones.

In at least one embodiment of the hybrid bit (described below in various figures), the higher pin angles on the rolling cutters with the associated cutting elements can help assist the fixed blade cutting elements. This protection of the fixed blade cutting elements by adjusting the pin angles in the hybrid bits of the present invention are beyond those pin angles that have been used for roller cone bits due to the interrelationships between the fixed blades and the rolling cutters. The higher pin angles can be especially advantageous in the nose, shoulder, and gage sections of the cutting profile of the cutting elements that carry a heavy burden with excessive wear in drilling the hole.

The remaining figures illustrate various unconventional pin angles for a hybrid bit having multiple rolling cones and at least one fixed blade, often multiple fixed blades. The embodiments are merely exemplary embodiments. Other angles, other quantities of fixed blades and/or rolling cutters, and other variations can be made, so that the invention is not limited to any particle examples illustrated herein.

FIG. 4A illustrates a schematic bottom view of another exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 4B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 4C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a high pin angle. The figures will be described in conjunction with each other.

FIGS. 4A-4C illustrate an embodiment having a pin angle of approximately 70 degrees. The hybrid bit 50 includes multiple fixed blades 58a, 58b (generally “58”) that are interrelated to multiple rolling cutters 72a, 72b (generally “72”). The rolling cutters 72 are each rotationally coupled to a spindle, such as spindle 66a, and can rotate about their respective axes of rotation 67a, 67b at respective pin angles “α”. For the embodiment shown in FIGS. 4A-4C, the pin angle “α” for rolling cutter 72a is approximately 70 degrees.

The cutting profile 78 of the hybrid bit in FIG. 4C is similar to the cutting profile of the hybrid bit in FIG. 3C, primarily based on the configuration of the fixed blade 58. However, the effects of the fixed blade cutting elements and cutting elements of the rolling cutter can be combined primarily in the shoulder region 84, and partially combined in the nose region 82 in a different way due to the high pin angle of the rolling cutter. This variance in combined effects of the nose and shoulder regions between FIG. 4C and FIG. 3C is caused by the different and nonconventional pin angle “α” of approximately 70 degrees. This unconventional pin angle allows the rolling cutters 72 to assist the fixed cutters 62 more in at least the shoulder region of the cutting profile.

The normal constraints of having a high pin angle such as spindle and leg strength, cutting profile, cutting element life, and bearing life of the rolling cutters are interrelated to the fixed blades and their cutting elements and design. By coordinating the fixed blade cutting elements with the rolling cutters at high pin angles, the counteracting effects can be optimized for given purposes. Such customization is within the capability of those with ordinary skill in the art, such as oil field drilling bit design engineers, given the teachings and information provided herein.

FIG. 5A illustrates a schematic bottom view of another exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 5B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 5C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a high pin angle. The figures will be described in conjunction with each other.

FIGS. 5A-5C illustrate an embodiment having a pin angle of approximately 88 degrees. The hybrid bit 50 includes multiple fixed blades 58a, 58b (generally “58”) that are interrelated to multiple rolling cutters 72a, 72b (generally “72”). The rolling cutters 72 are each rotationally coupled to a spindle, such as spindle 66a, and can rotate about their respective axes of rotation 67a, 67b at respective pin angles “α”. For the embodiment shown in FIGS. 4A-4C, the pin angle “α” for rolling cutter 72a is approximately 88 degrees.

The cutting profile 78 of the hybrid bit in FIG. 5C is similar to the cutting profile of the hybrid bit in FIG. 3C and FIG. 4C, primarily based on the configuration of the fixed blade 58. However, the effects of the fixed blade cutting elements and cutting elements of the rolling cutter can be combined in the shoulder region 84 and in the gage region 86 in a different way due to the high pin angle of the rolling cutter. This variance in combined effects of the shoulder and gage regions between FIG. 5C and FIG. 3C is caused by the different and nonconventional pin angle “a” of approximately 88 degrees. This unconventional pin angle allows the rolling cutters 72 to assist the fixed cutters 62 more in the shoulder and gage regions of the cutting profile.

One exemplary range of pin angles “α” is greater than 39 degrees and less than 90 degrees, in which the spindle 66 is disposed inwardly toward the centerline 52 and downwardly toward a distal end of the drill bit from the shank 54, as viewed from the orientation in FIG. 5C. At a pin angle of 90 degrees, the spindle is disposed downwardly and parallel to the centerline 52.

FIG. 6A illustrates a schematic bottom view of another exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 6B illustrates a schematic side view of an exemplary hybrid drill bit. FIG. 6C illustrates a schematic cutting profile with a cross sectional side view of an exemplary spindle having a high pin angle. The figures will be described in conjunction with each other.

FIGS. 6A-6C illustrate an embodiment having a pin angle of approximately 115 degrees. The hybrid bit 50 includes multiple fixed blades 58a, 58b (generally “58”) that are interrelated to multiple rolling cutters 72a, 72b (generally “72”). The rolling cutters 72 are each rotationally coupled to a spindle, such as spindle 66a, and can rotate about their respective axes of rotation 67a, 67b at respective pin angles “α”. For the embodiment shown in FIGS. 4A-4C, the pin angle “α” for rolling cutter 72a is approximately 115 degrees.

The cutting profile 78 of the hybrid bit in FIG. 6C is similar to the cutting profile of the hybrid bit in FIGS. 3C, 4C, and 5C, primarily based on the configuration of the fixed blade 58. However, the effects of the fixed blade cutting elements and cutting elements of the rolling cutter can be combined primarily in the gage region 86, and partially combined in the shoulder region 84. This variance in combined effects of the shoulder and gage regions between FIG. 6C and FIG. 3C is caused by the different and nonconventional pin angle “α” of approximately 115 degrees. This unconventional pin angle allows the rolling cutters 72 to assist the fixed cutters 62 more in the gage region of the cutting profile.

For pin angles greater than 90 degrees to less than 180 degrees, the spindle 66a is disposed outwardly away from the centerline 52 of the drill bit 50 and downwardly toward a distal end of the drill bit from the shank 54, as viewed from the orientation in FIG. 6C. For a pin angle of 180 degrees, the spindle 66a is disposed outwardly away from the centerline 52 and orthogonal to the centerline 52. For pin angles greater than 180 degrees and less than 270 degrees, the spindle 66a is disposed outwardly away from the centerline 52 of the drill bit 50 and upwardly toward the shank 54. For a pin angle of 270 degrees, the spindle 66a is disposed upwardly and parallel to the centerline 52. For pin angles greater than 270 to less than 360, the spindle 66a is disposed inwardly toward the centerline 52 and upwardly toward the shank 54. For a pin angle of 360 degrees, the spindle 66a is disposed inwardly toward the centerline 52 and orthogonal to the centerline 52. For pin angles greater than 360 degrees to less than 393 degrees, the spindle is disposed inwardly toward the centerline 52 and downward toward a distal end of the drill bit from the shank 54.

The exemplary and nonlimiting angles referenced herein are shown as exemplary whole numbers. Any angle between the ranges given, inclusive, can be used and is included within the scope of the claims. For example, angles greater than 39 degrees and less than 90 degrees, can include angles of 40, 41, 42, . . . 87, 88, and 89 degrees. Further, the pin angles of the present invention described herein are not limited to whole numbers, but rather can include portions of whole numbers, such as fractional and decimal portions. For example and without limitation, between the angles of 40 and 41 degrees, the angles can include angles of 40.1, 40.2 degrees and so forth, as well as 40.11, 40.12 degrees and so forth, and 40½ degrees, 40¼ degrees and so forth. Angles of at least 90 degrees and less than 270 degrees can include angles of 90, 91, 92, . . . 267, 268, and 269 degrees and any portions thereof. Angles of at least 270 degrees and less than 360 degrees can include angles of 270, 271, 272, . . . 357, 358, and 359 degrees and any portions thereof. Angles of at least 360 degrees and less than 393 degrees can include angles of 360, 361, 362, . . . 390, 391, and 392 degrees and any portions thereof.

Other and further embodiments utilizing one or more aspects of the inventions described above can be devised without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, one or more of the rolling cutters could individually have a pin angle that is different from a pin angle of another rolling cutter on the hybrid bit. Further, the various methods and embodiments of the hybrid drill bit can be included in combination with each other to produce variations of the disclosed methods and embodiments. Discussion of singular elements can include plural elements and vice-versa.

The order of any steps explicitly or implicitly disclosed herein can occur in a variety of sequences unless otherwise specifically limited. The various steps described herein can be combined with other steps, interlineated with the stated steps, and/or split into multiple steps. Similarly, elements have been described functionally and can be embodied as separate components or can be combined into components having multiple functions.

The invention has been described in the context of advantageous and other embodiments and not every embodiment of the invention has been described. Modifications and alterations to the described embodiments are available to those of ordinary skill in the art. The disclosed and undisclosed embodiments are not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the invention conceived of by the Applicants, but rather, in conformity with the patent laws, Applicants intend to fully protect all such modifications and improvements that come within the scope or range of equivalent of the following claims.

Claims

1. A hybrid drill bit for use in drilling through subterranean formations, the hybrid drill bit comprising:

a shank disposed about a longitudinal centerline and adapted to be coupled to a drilling string;
at least one fixed blade extending in an axial direction downwardly and coupled to the shank;
at least one fixed cutting element arranged on the fixed blade;
at least two rolling cutter legs coupled to the shank, each comprising a spindle having a respective spindle axis of rotation; and
at least two rolling cutters, each coupled to a respective one of the at least two rolling cutter legs distally from the shank and adapted to rotate about the respective spindle axis of rotation, at least one of the rolling cutters having a spindle axis of rotation disposed at a pin angle that is either greater than 39 degrees and less than or equal to 180 degrees, or greater than or equal to 225 degrees and less than 393 degrees; and
wherein the at least two rolling cutters are disposed at different pin angles.

2. The hybrid drill bit of claim 1, wherein the pin angle is greater than 39 degrees and less than or equal to 90 degrees.

3. The hybrid drill bit of claim 1, wherein the pin angle is greater than 90 degrees and less than or equal to 180 degrees.

4. The hybrid drill bit of claim 1, wherein the pin angle is greater than or equal to 225 degrees and less than or equal to 270 degrees.

5. The hybrid drill bit of claim 1, wherein the pin angle is greater than 270 degrees and less than 393 degrees.

6. A hybrid drill bit for use in drilling through subterranean formations, the hybrid drill bit comprising:

a shank disposed about a longitudinal centerline and adapted to be coupled to a drilling string;
at least one fixed blade extending in an axial direction downwardly and coupled to the shank;
at least one fixed cutting element arranged on the fixed blade;
at least two rolling cutter legs coupled to the shank, each comprising a spindle having a respective spindle axis of rotation, at least one of the rolling cutter legs having a spindle axis of rotation disposed at a pin angle that is either greater than 39 degrees and less than or equal to 180 degrees, or greater than or equal to 225 degrees and less than 393 degrees; and
wherein the at least two rolling cutter legs are disposed at different pin angles.

7. The hybrid drill bit of claim 6, wherein the pin angle is greater than 39 degrees and less than or equal to 90 degrees.

8. The hybrid drill bit of claim 6, wherein the pin angle is greater than 90 degrees and less than or equal to 180 degrees.

9. The hybrid drill bit of claim 6, wherein the pin angle is greater than or equal to 225 degrees and less than or equal to 270 degrees.

10. The hybrid drill bit of claim 6, wherein the pin angle is greater than 270 degrees and less than 393 degrees.

11. A hybrid drill bit for use in drilling through subterranean formations, the hybrid drill bit comprising:

a shank disposed about a longitudinal centerline and adapted to be coupled to a drilling string;
at least one fixed blade extending in an axial direction downwardly and coupled to the shank;
at least one fixed cutting element arranged on the fixed blade;
at least two rolling cutter legs coupled to the shank, each comprising a spindle having a spindle axis of rotation disposed at a respective pin angle; and
wherein the respective pin angles are different.

12. The hybrid drill bit of claim 11, wherein at least one of the pin angles is greater than 39 degrees and less than or equal to 90 degrees.

13. The hybrid drill bit of claim 11, wherein at least one of the pin angles is greater than 90 degrees and less than or equal to 180 degrees.

14. The hybrid drill bit of claim 11, wherein at least one of the pin angles is greater than or equal to 225 degrees and less than or equal to 270 degrees.

15. The hybrid drill bit of claim 11, wherein at least one of the pin angles is greater than 270 degrees and less than 393 degrees.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
930759 August 1909 Hughes
1388424 September 1921 George
1394769 October 1921 Sorensen
1519641 December 1924 Thompson
1816568 July 1931 Carlson
1821474 September 1931 Mercer
1874066 August 1932 Scott et al.
1879127 September 1932 Schlumpf
1896243 February 1933 Macdonald
1932487 October 1933 Scott
2030722 February 1936 Scott
2117481 May 1938 Howard et al.
2119618 June 1938 Zublin
2198849 April 1940 Waxler
2216894 October 1940 Stancliff
2244537 June 1941 Kammerer
2297157 September 1942 McClinton
2320136 May 1943 Kammerer
2320137 May 1943 Kammerer
2380112 July 1945 Kinnear
RE23416 October 1951 Kinnear
2719026 September 1955 Boice
2815932 December 1957 Wolfram
2994389 August 1961 Bus, Sr.
3010708 November 1961 Hlinsky et al.
3050293 August 1962 Hlinsky
3055443 September 1962 Edwards
3066749 December 1962 Hildebrandt
3126066 March 1964 Williams, Jr.
3126067 March 1964 Schumacher, Jr.
3174564 March 1965 Morlan
3239431 March 1966 Raymond
3250337 May 1966 Demo
3269469 August 1966 Kelly, Jr
3387673 June 1968 Thompson
3424258 January 1969 Nakayama
3583501 June 1971 Aalund
RE28625 November 1975 Cunningham
4006788 February 8, 1977 Garner
4140189 February 20, 1979 Garner
4190126 February 26, 1980 Kabashima
4270812 June 2, 1981 Thomas
4285409 August 25, 1981 Allen
4293048 October 6, 1981 Kloesel, Jr.
4320808 March 23, 1982 Garrett
4343371 August 10, 1982 Baker et al.
4359112 November 16, 1982 Garner et al.
4369849 January 25, 1983 Parrish
4386669 June 7, 1983 Evans
4410284 October 18, 1983 Herrick
4428687 January 31, 1984 Zahradnik
4444281 April 24, 1984 Schumacher et al.
4527637 July 9, 1985 Bodine
4572306 February 25, 1986 Dorosz
4657091 April 14, 1987 Higdon
4664705 May 12, 1987 Horton et al.
4690228 September 1, 1987 Voelz et al.
4706765 November 17, 1987 Lee et al.
4726718 February 23, 1988 Meskin et al.
4727942 March 1, 1988 Galle et al.
4738322 April 19, 1988 Hall et al.
4765205 August 23, 1988 Higdon
4874047 October 17, 1989 Hixon
4875532 October 24, 1989 Langford, Jr.
4892159 January 9, 1990 Holster
4915181 April 10, 1990 Labrosse
4932484 June 12, 1990 Warren et al.
4936398 June 26, 1990 Auty et al.
4943488 July 24, 1990 Sung et al.
4953641 September 4, 1990 Pessier
4976324 December 11, 1990 Tibbitts
4984643 January 15, 1991 Isbell et al.
4991671 February 12, 1991 Pearce et al.
5016718 May 21, 1991 Tandberg
5027912 July 2, 1991 Juergens
5028177 July 2, 1991 Meskin et al.
5030276 July 9, 1991 Sung et al.
5049164 September 17, 1991 Horton et al.
5116568 May 26, 1992 Sung et al.
5145017 September 8, 1992 Holster et al.
5176212 January 5, 1993 Tandberg
5224560 July 6, 1993 Fernandez
5238074 August 24, 1993 Tibbitts et al.
5287936 February 22, 1994 Grimes et al.
5289889 March 1, 1994 Gearhart et al.
5337843 August 16, 1994 Torgrimsen et al.
5346026 September 13, 1994 Pessier et al.
5351770 October 4, 1994 Cawthorne et al.
5361859 November 8, 1994 Tibbitts
5429200 July 4, 1995 Blackman et al.
5439068 August 8, 1995 Huffstutler et al.
5452771 September 26, 1995 Blackman et al.
5467836 November 21, 1995 Grimes et al.
5472057 December 5, 1995 Winfree
5472271 December 5, 1995 Bowers et al.
5513715 May 7, 1996 Dysart
5518077 May 21, 1996 Blackman et al.
5547033 August 20, 1996 Campos, Jr.
5553681 September 10, 1996 Huffstutler et al.
5558170 September 24, 1996 Thigpen et al.
5560440 October 1, 1996 Tibbitts
5570750 November 5, 1996 Williams
5593231 January 14, 1997 Ippolito
5606895 March 4, 1997 Huffstutler
5624002 April 29, 1997 Huffstutler
5641029 June 24, 1997 Beaton et al.
5644956 July 8, 1997 Blackman et al.
5655612 August 12, 1997 Grimes et al.
D384084 September 23, 1997 Huffstutler et al.
5695018 December 9, 1997 Pessier et al.
5695019 December 9, 1997 Shamburger, Jr.
5755297 May 26, 1998 Young et al.
5862871 January 26, 1999 Curlett
5868502 February 9, 1999 Cariveau et al.
5873422 February 23, 1999 Hansen et al.
5941322 August 24, 1999 Stephenson et al.
5944125 August 31, 1999 Byrd
5967246 October 19, 1999 Caraway et al.
5979576 November 9, 1999 Hansen et al.
5988303 November 23, 1999 Arfele
5992542 November 30, 1999 Rives
5996713 December 7, 1999 Pessier et al.
6092613 July 25, 2000 Caraway et al.
6095265 August 1, 2000 Alsup
6109375 August 29, 2000 Tso
6116357 September 12, 2000 Wagoner et al.
6173797 January 16, 2001 Dykstra et al.
6220374 April 24, 2001 Crawford
6241034 June 5, 2001 Steinke et al.
6241036 June 5, 2001 Lovato et al.
6250407 June 26, 2001 Karlsson
6260635 July 17, 2001 Crawford
6279671 August 28, 2001 Panigrahi et al.
6283233 September 4, 2001 Lamine et al.
6296069 October 2, 2001 Lamine et al.
RE37450 November 20, 2001 Deken et al.
6345673 February 12, 2002 Siracki
6360831 March 26, 2002 Akesson et al.
6367568 April 9, 2002 Steinke et al.
6386302 May 14, 2002 Beaton
6401844 June 11, 2002 Doster et al.
6405811 June 18, 2002 Borchardt
6408958 June 25, 2002 Isbell et al.
6415687 July 9, 2002 Saxman
6439326 August 27, 2002 Huang et al.
6446739 September 10, 2002 Richman et al.
6450270 September 17, 2002 Saxton
6460635 October 8, 2002 Kalsi et al.
6474424 November 5, 2002 Saxman
6510906 January 28, 2003 Richert et al.
6510909 January 28, 2003 Portwood et al.
6527066 March 4, 2003 Rives
6533051 March 18, 2003 Singh et al.
6544308 April 8, 2003 Griffin et al.
6562462 May 13, 2003 Griffin et al.
6568490 May 27, 2003 Tso et al.
6581700 June 24, 2003 Curlett et al.
6585064 July 1, 2003 Griffin et al.
6589640 July 8, 2003 Griffin et al.
6592985 July 15, 2003 Griffin et al.
6601661 August 5, 2003 Baker et al.
6601662 August 5, 2003 Matthias et al.
6684967 February 3, 2004 Mensa-Wilmot et al.
6729418 May 4, 2004 Slaughter, Jr. et al.
6739214 May 25, 2004 Griffin et al.
6742607 June 1, 2004 Beaton
6745858 June 8, 2004 Estes
6749033 June 15, 2004 Griffin et al.
6797326 September 28, 2004 Griffin et al.
6823951 November 30, 2004 Yong et al.
6843333 January 18, 2005 Richert et al.
6861098 March 1, 2005 Griffin et al.
6861137 March 1, 2005 Griffin et al.
6878447 April 12, 2005 Griffin et al.
6883623 April 26, 2005 McCormick et al.
6902014 June 7, 2005 Estes
6986395 January 17, 2006 Chen
6988569 January 24, 2006 Lockstedt et al.
7096978 August 29, 2006 Dykstra et al.
7111694 September 26, 2006 Beaton
7137460 November 21, 2006 Slaughter, Jr. et al.
7152702 December 26, 2006 Bhome et al.
7197806 April 3, 2007 Boudreaux et al.
7198119 April 3, 2007 Hall et al.
7234550 June 26, 2007 Azar et al.
7270196 September 18, 2007 Hall
7281592 October 16, 2007 Runia et al.
7320375 January 22, 2008 Singh
7350568 April 1, 2008 Mandal et al.
7350601 April 1, 2008 Belnap et al.
7360612 April 22, 2008 Chen et al.
7377341 May 27, 2008 Middlemiss et al.
7387177 June 17, 2008 Zahradnik et al.
7392862 July 1, 2008 Zahradnik et al.
7398837 July 15, 2008 Hall et al.
7416036 August 26, 2008 Forstner et al.
7435478 October 14, 2008 Keshavan
7462003 December 9, 2008 Middlemiss
7473287 January 6, 2009 Belnap et al.
7493973 February 24, 2009 Keshavan et al.
7517589 April 14, 2009 Eyre
7533740 May 19, 2009 Zhang et al.
7568534 August 4, 2009 Griffin et al.
7621346 November 24, 2009 Trinh et al.
7621348 November 24, 2009 Hoffmaster et al.
7703556 April 27, 2010 Smith et al.
7703557 April 27, 2010 Durairajan et al.
7819208 October 26, 2010 Pessier et al.
7836975 November 23, 2010 Chen et al.
7845435 December 7, 2010 Zahradnik et al.
7845437 December 7, 2010 Bielawa et al.
7847437 December 7, 2010 Chakrabarti et al.
20020092684 July 18, 2002 Singh et al.
20020108785 August 15, 2002 Slaughter, Jr. et al.
20040099448 May 27, 2004 Fielder et al.
20040238224 December 2, 2004 Runia
20050087370 April 28, 2005 Ledgerwood, III et al.
20050103533 May 19, 2005 Sherwood, Jr. et al.
20050178587 August 18, 2005 Witman, IV et al.
20050183892 August 25, 2005 Oldham et al.
20050263328 December 1, 2005 Middlemiss
20050273301 December 8, 2005 Huang
20060032674 February 16, 2006 Chen et al.
20060032677 February 16, 2006 Azar et al.
20060162969 July 27, 2006 Belnap et al.
20060196699 September 7, 2006 Estes et al.
20060254830 November 16, 2006 Radtke
20060266558 November 30, 2006 Middlemiss et al.
20060266559 November 30, 2006 Keshavan et al.
20060278442 December 14, 2006 Kristensen
20060283640 December 21, 2006 Estes et al.
20070029114 February 8, 2007 Middlemiss
20070062736 March 22, 2007 Cariveau et al.
20070079994 April 12, 2007 Middlemiss
20070131457 June 14, 2007 McDonough et al.
20070187155 August 16, 2007 Middlemiss
20070221417 September 27, 2007 Hall et al.
20080066970 March 20, 2008 Zahradnik et al.
20080264695 October 30, 2008 Zahradnik et al.
20080296068 December 4, 2008 Zahradnik et al.
20090114454 May 7, 2009 Belnap et al.
20090120693 May 14, 2009 McClain et al.
20090126998 May 21, 2009 Zahradnik et al.
20090159338 June 25, 2009 Buske
20090159341 June 25, 2009 Pessier et al.
20090166093 July 2, 2009 Pessier et al.
20090178855 July 16, 2009 Zhang et al.
20090183925 July 23, 2009 Zhang et al.
20090272582 November 5, 2009 McCormick et al.
20100018777 January 28, 2010 Pessier et al.
20100025119 February 4, 2010 Stauffer
20100155145 June 24, 2010 Pessier et al.
20100155146 June 24, 2010 Nguyen et al.
20100181292 July 22, 2010 Stauffer et al.
20100224417 September 9, 2010 Zahradnik et al.
20100270085 October 28, 2010 Turner et al.
20100276205 November 4, 2010 Oxford et al.
20100288561 November 18, 2010 Zahradnik et al.
20100320001 December 23, 2010 Kulkarni
20110024197 February 3, 2011 Centala et al.
20110079440 April 7, 2011 Buske et al.
20110079441 April 7, 2011 Buske et al.
20110079442 April 7, 2011 Buske et al.
20110079443 April 7, 2011 Buske et al.
20110162893 July 7, 2011 Zhang
Foreign Patent Documents
13 01 784 August 1969 DE
0225101 June 1987 EP
0157278 November 1989 EP
0391683 January 1996 EP
0874128 October 1998 EP
2089187 August 2009 EP
2183694 June 1987 GB
2000080878 March 2000 JP
2001159289 June 2001 JP
1 331 988 August 1987 SU
8502223 May 1985 WO
2008124572 October 2008 WO
Other references
  • Beijer, G., International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/042514, The International Bureau of WIPO, dated Nov. 2, 2010.
  • Jung Hye Lee, International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/042514, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Nov. 27, 2009.
  • Jung Hye Lee, Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/042514, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Nov. 27, 2009.
  • International Search Report for corresponding International patent application No. PCT/US2008/083532. Feb. 2, 2009.
  • Written Opinion for corresponding International patent application No. PCT/US2008/083532. Feb. 2, 2009.
  • Sheppard, N. and Dolly, B. “Rock Drilling—Hybrid Bit Success for Syndax3 Pins.” Industrial Diamond Review, Jun. 1993, pp. 309-311.
  • Tomlinson, P. and Clark, I. “Rock Drilling—Syndax3 Pins—New Concepts in PCD Drilling.” Industrial Diamond Review, Mar. 1992, pp. 109-114.
  • Williams, J. and Thompson, A. “An Analysis of the Performance of PDC Hybrid Drill Bits.” SPE/IADC 16117, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Mar. 1987, pp. 585-594.
  • Warren, T. and Sinor L. “PDC Bits: What's Needed to Meet Tomorrow's Challenge.” SPE 27978, University of Tulsa Centennial Petroleum Engineering Symposium, Aug. 1994, pp. 207-214.
  • Smith Services. “Hole Opener—Model 6980 Hole Opener.” [retrieved from the Internet on May 7, 2008 using <URL: http://www.siismithservices.com/b—products/product—page.asp?ID=589>].
  • Mills Machine Company, Inc. “Rotary Hole Openers—Section 8.” [retrieved from the Internet on Apr. 27, 2009 using <URL: http://www.millsmachine.com/pages/home—page/mills—catalog/cat—holeopen/cat—holeopen.pdf>].
  • Ersoy, A. and Waller, M. “Wear characteristics of PDC pin and hybrid core bits in rock drilling.” Wear 188, Elsevier Science S.A., Mar. 1995, pp. 150-165.
  • Sung Joon Lee, International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/050672, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Mar. 3, 2010.
  • Sung Joon Lee, Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/050672, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Mar. 3, 2010.
  • Pessier, R. and Damschen, M., “Hybrid Bits Offer Distinct Advantages in Selected Roller Cone and PDC Bit Applications,” IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Feb. 2-4, 2010, New Orleans.
  • S.H. Kim, International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/067969, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated May 25, 2010.
  • S.H. Kim, Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/067969, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated May 25, 2010.
  • R. Buske, C. Rickabaugh, J. Bradford, H. Lukasewich and J. Overstreet. “Performance Paradigm Shift: Drilling Vertical and Directional Sections Through Abrasive Formations with Roller Cone Bits.” Society of Petroleum Engineers—SPE 114975, CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference, Canada, Jun. 16-19, 2008.
  • Dr. M. Wells, T. Marvel and C. Beuershausen. “Bit Balling Mitigation in PDC Bit Design.” International Association of Drilling Contractors/Society of Petroleum Engineers—IADC/SPE 114673, IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Indonesia, Aug. 25-27, 2008.
  • B. George, E. Grayson, R. Lays, F. Felderhoff, M. Doster and M. Holmes. “Significant Cost Savings Achieved Through the Use of PDC Bits in Compressed Air/Foam Applications.” Society of Petroleum Engineers—SPE 116118, 2008 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, Sep. 21-24, 2008.
  • Kang, K.H., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/033513, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Jan. 10, 2011.
  • Kang, K.H., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/033513, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Jan. 10, 2011.
  • Kang, M.S., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/032511, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Jan. 17, 2011.
  • Kang, M.S., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/032511, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Jan. 17, 2011.
  • Choi, J.S., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/039100, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Jan. 25, 2011.
  • Choi, J.S., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/039100, Korean Intellectual Property Office, dated Jan. 25, 2011.
  • Baharlou, S., International Preliminary Report on Patentability, The International Bureau of WIPO, dated Jan. 25, 2011.
  • Becamel, P., International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 5, 2012, The International Bureau of WIPO, Switzerland.
  • Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051019, dated Jun. 6, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051019, dated Jun. 6, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051020, dated Jun. 1, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051020, dated Jun. 1, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051017, dated Jun. 8, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051017, dated Jun. 8, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051014, dated Jun. 9, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051014, dated Jun. 9, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050631, dated Jun. 10, 2011, European Patent Office.
  • Georgescu, M., Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/050631, dated Jun. 10, 2011, European Patent Office.
Patent History
Patent number: 8141664
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 3, 2009
Date of Patent: Mar 27, 2012
Patent Publication Number: 20100224417
Assignee: Baker Hughes Incorporated (Houston, TX)
Inventors: Anton F. Zahradnik (Sugar Land, TX), Don Q. Nguyen (Houston, TX), Alan J. Massey (Houston, TX)
Primary Examiner: Jennifer H Gay
Attorney: Locke Lord LLP
Application Number: 12/397,094
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Rolling Cutter Bit With Fixed Cutter (175/336)
International Classification: E21B 10/00 (20060101);