Sound control mat

A sound control mat, comprising: a resilient layer of extruded polymer monofilaments, and a fiberglass scrim adhered to the resilient layer. A floor assembly employing the foregoing sound control mat is disclosed.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to sound control mats. The sound control mats are useful for noise control with flooring systems.

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional products are used with floor systems for reducing impact noise.

SUMMARY

This invention relates to a sound control mat, comprising: a resilient layer of extruded polymer monofilaments, the polymer monofilaments being heat welded at junctions to form a matrix of tangled monofilaments, the resilient layer having a machine direction, a cross-direction, a first side and a second side, the resilient layer comprising a plurality of waves forming a repeating pattern of peaks and valleys, the waves extending in the machine direction and the cross-direction, the average ratio of the width of the waves, as measured in the cross-direction, to the length of the waves, as measured in the machine direction, being at least about 2:1; and a fiberglass scrim overlying the second side of the resilient layer, the scrim comprising a plurality of fiberglass strands, the resilient layer being heat welded to the fiberglass scrim.

This invention also relates to a floor assembly, comprising: a sub-flooring layer; a top-flooring layer overlying the sub-flooring layer; and the above-indicated sound control mat positioned between the sub-flooring layer and the top-flooring layer, the resilient layer contacting the sub-flooring layer, the scrim contacting the top-flooring layer.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the annexed drawings like parts and features have like references. A number of the drawings are schematic illustrations which may not necessarily be drawn to scale.

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a sound control mat within the scope of the invention, the sound control mat comprising a resilient layer and a fiberglass scrim, part of the resilient layer being cut away to show the scrim.

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the sound control mat illustrated in FIG. 1 with the mat turned over and rotated 90°, the scrim being shown in greater detail.

FIG. 3 is a side elevation of the sound control mat illustrated in FIG. 2, this side view showing the resilient layer with a repeating pattern of peaks and valleys extending in the machine direction.

FIG. 4 is a side elevational view of a flooring system within the scope of the invention, the flooring system comprising a sub-flooring layer, a top flooring layer overlying the sub-flooring layer, and the sound control mat illustrated in FIGS. 1-3 and 5 positioned between the sub-flooring layer and the top flooring layer, the resilient layer of the sound control mat contacting the sub-flooring layer, and the scrim of the sound control mat contacting the top-flooring layer.

FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of the sound control mat illustrated in FIGS. 1-4 wherein the sound control mat is shown in the form of a roll.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

All numerical ranges disclosed in the specification and claims may be combined in any manner. It is to be understood that unless specifically stated otherwise, references to “a,” “an,” and/or “the” may include one or more than one, and that reference to an item in the singular may also include the item in the plural. All combinations specified in the claims may be combined in any manner.

The term “machine direction” refers to the direction of the flow of polymer from an extruder when forming the inventive sound control mat.

The term “cross-direction” refers to the direction that is oriented 90° from the machine direction.

The expression, “a plurality of waves forming a repeating pattern of peaks and valleys” is used herein to refer to the shape of the resilient layer of the inventive sound control mat. The waves, as viewed from a side edge of the mat, may have a sinuous configuration or a serpentine configuration. The waves, in their illustrated embodiment, are shown in FIGS. 1-5. In the illustrated embodiment, the waves have irregularities as a result of the fact that the resilient layer is made from a plurality of extruded polymer monofilaments that are entangled, and some of the waves may have edges and/or dimensions that are slightly different than other waves in the resilient layer. The average ratio of the width of the waves, as measured in the cross-direction, to the length of the waves, as measured in the machine direction, is at least about 2:1, and may be at least about 10:1.

The term “scrim” is used herein to refer to a thin layer of fiberglass strands. The layer of fiberglass strands may be a woven layer.

The term “resilient layer” refers to the fact that when the inventive sound control mat is installed in the above-identified inventive floor assembly, the resilient layer may give or attenuate in response to impacting forces contacting the top flooring layer. This give or attenuation is believed to be due, at least in part, to the construction of the resilient layer with its plurality of waves in the form of a repeating pattern of peaks and valleys. This give or attenuation has the effect of creating a sound break or “spring” between the flooring layers. This may result in the sub-flooring layer receiving less of an impact from vibration which in turn may lower the level of sound heard by occupants in rooms above and/or below the inventive floor assembly.

Referring to FIGS. 1-5, the inventive sound control mat, in its illustrated embodiment, comprises sound control mat 10 which includes resilient layer 30 and fiberglass scrim 60. The mat 10 has a machine direction, which is indicated by the arrow 12, and a cross-direction, which is indicated by the arrow 14. The machine direction 12 is the direction in which polymer monofilaments 32 used to make the resilient layer 30 flow out of an extruder and onto a substrate during the formation of the mat 10. The cross-direction 14 is the direction that is oriented 90° from the machine direction 12.

The resilient layer 30 is formed from a plurality of the extruded polymer monofilaments 32. The monofilaments 32 are welded at junctions to form a matrix 34 of the polymer monofilaments 32. The resilient layer 30 has a first side 40 and a second side 42. The resilient layer 30 comprises a plurality of waves 35 which provide a repeating pattern of peaks 36 and valleys 38. Each wave 35 has a pair of legs 44 and 46 extending from the peaks 36 to the valleys 38. The legs 44 and 46 are heat welded to the fiberglass scrim 60 at points of contact 62. The average distance in the machine direction 12 from one point of contact 62 to the next point of contact 62 may be in the range from about 0.25 to about 3 inches, and in one embodiment in the range from about 0.5 to about 0.75 inches. The average ratio of the width of each wave 35, as measured in the cross-direction 14, to the length of each wave 35, as measured in the machine direction 12, from one point of contact 62 to the next point of contact 62, may be at least about 2:1, and in one embodiment at least about 10:1, and in one embodiment in the range from about 16:1 to about 100:1, and in one embodiment in the range from about 16:1 to about 25:1, and in one embodiment in the range from about 50:1 to about 100:1.

The resilient layer 30 may have a thickness with a major dimension A in the range from about 0.1 to about 1 inch, and in one embodiment from about 0.2 to about 0.8 inch. The resilient layer 30 may have a thickness with a minor dimension B in the range from about 0.01 to about 0.04 inch, and in one embodiment in the range from about 0.02 to about 0.03 inch. The resilient layer 30 may have from about 25 to about 400 polymer monofilaments 32 per foot as measured along the cross-direction 14 of the mat 10, and in one embodiment from about 75 to about 150 polymer monofilaments 32 per foot. The polymer monofilaments 32 may have an average diameter in the range from about 1 to about 4 mils, and in one embodiment from about 2 to about 3 mils.

The resilient layer 30 may be made from any thermoplastic polymer that provides the desired properties of strength and resilience when used in the inventive floor assembly. The resilient layer 30 may be made of a polyolefin, polyamide, polyester, polyvinylchloride (PVC), or a mixture of two or more thereof. The polyolefin may comprise polyethylene, polypropylene, or a mixture thereof. The polyamide may be a Nylon.

The fiberglass scrim 60 overlies the second side 42 of the resilient layer 30. The resilient layer 30 is heat welded to the fiberglass scrim 60 at the points of contact 62. The fiberglass scrim 60 may comprise a fiberglass layer 64 and a polymer coating 66. The fiberglass layer 64 may be a woven layer. The fiberglass layer 64 has a plurality of fiberglass strands 68 extending parallel to one another in the machine direction 12, and a plurality of fiberglass strands 70 extending parallel to one another in the cross-direction 14. The fiberglass strands 66 and 70 intersect one another at angles of about 90°. The strands 68 and 70 may be referred to as yarns. The strands 68 and 70 may be aligned in a side-by-side configuration or in an over/under configuration. The polymer coating 66 provides a binding to hold the strands 68 and 70 together in the scrim 60.

The fiberglass strands 68 and 70 may each comprise a plurality of fiberglass filaments. The fiberglass filaments may be combined with filaments of another material, for example, a polymer such as polyester. The average diameter of the fiberglass strands 68 and 70 may be in the range from about 10 to about 200 mils, and in one embodiment in the range from about 20 to about 40 mils. The number of fiberglass strands 68 extending in the machine direction 12 may be in the range from about 1 to about 20 strands per inch of scrim 60 as measured in the cross-direction 14, and in one embodiment in the range from about 6 to about 10 strands per inch, and in one embodiment about 7 or 8 strands per inch. The number of fiberglass strands 70 extending in the cross-direction 14 may be in the range from about 1 to about 20 strands per inch of scrim 60 as measured in the machine direction 12, and in one embodiment in the range from about 6 to about 10 strands per inch of scrim as measured in the machine direction 12, and in one embodiment about 7 or about 8 strands per inch.

The polymer coating 66 may comprise any coating that is sufficient to bind the strands 68 and 70 and provide the scrim 60 with the dimensional stability, strength and flexibility characteristics required for use in the sound control mat 10. The polymer coating 66 may provide a polymer layer 71 extending between the strands 68 and 70. The polymer layer 71 may be sufficient to make the fiberglass scrim 60 water or moisture impermeable. The strands 68 and 70 may be embedded in the polymer layer 71. The polymer layer 71 may overlie one or both sides of the strands 68 and 70. The polymer coating may be made of a polyolefin, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylchloride (PVC), polyacrylate, styrene-butadiene rubber, or a mixture of two or more thereof. The polyolefin may comprise polyethylene, polypropylene, or a mixture thereof. The polymer coating may be formed using a plastisol, such as a PVC plastisol. The term “plastisol” is used herein to refer to a suspension of polymer particles in a plasticizer.

The scrim 60 may have a thickness in the range from about 5 to about 20 mils, and in one embodiment from about 10 to about 15 mils.

An example of a scrim that may be used is available from Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics under Product Number GD8811/V38/V38. This scrim is made of fiberglass yarn. The pattern is 8×7.5 yarns per inch. The tensile strength is 64×60 pounds per inch. The weight of this scrim is 3.45 ounces per square yard. The polymer coating used to form the scrim is a PVC plastisol (a suspension of polyvinyl chloride particles in a plasticizer).

The sound control mat 10 may have a weight in the range from about 1 to about 5 ounces per square foot, and in one embodiment in the range from about 2 to about 4 ounces per square foot, and in one embodiment in the range from about 1.5 to about 2.5 ounces per square foot. The mat 10 may have a porosity in the range from about 75 to about 98%, and in one embodiment in the range from about 90 to about 95%. The mat 10 may have any length and width that is suitable for the desired end use. The length, as measured in the machine direction 12, may be, for example, from about 25 to about 200 feet, and in one embodiment from about 50 to about 100 feet. The width, as measured in the cross-direction 14, may be, for example, in the range from about 3 to about 8 feet, and in one embodiment from about 3.5 to about 4.5 feet.

The sound control mat 10 may be supplied in the form of roll 90 to facilitate transport of the mat 10 and installation of the mat at the job site. The roll 90 is illustrated in FIG. 5. When forming the roll 90, the mat 10 may be rolled in the machine direction 12. The scrim 60 may be on the outside as illustrated in FIG. 5 when the mat 10 is rolled, or alternatively, the scrim 60 may be on the inside. The diameter of the roll 90 may be of any dimension suitable for providing the desired length of mat 10. For example, the roll 90 may have a diameter in the range from about 10 to about 36 inches, and in one embodiment in the range from about 20 to about 25 inches.

The process for making the sound control mat 10 may include the steps of extruding the polymer monofilaments 32 onto a substrate to form the resilient layer 30. The substrate may have a surface with a repeating pattern of peaks and valleys extending in the machine direction that is complimentary to or a “negative” shape corresponding to the repeating pattern of peaks and valleys formed in the resilient layer 30. The polymer monofilaments 32 may become entangled and heat welded to form a matrix 34 of tangled monofilaments. The fiberglass scrim 60 may then be placed in contact with the resilient layer 30 while the resilient layer 30 is in a sufficiently tacky state to allow the resilient layer 30 to be heat welded to the fiberglass scrim 60 at points of contact 62.

The sound control mat 10 may be used in forming the inventive floor assembly which, in its illustrated embodiment, is shown in FIG. 4. Referring to FIG. 4, the inventive floor assembly comprises floor assembly 100 which includes sub-flooring layer 110, top flooring layer 120 overlying the sub-flooring layer 110, and sound control mat 10 positioned between the sub-flooring layer 110 and the top flooring layer 120. The resilient layer 30 is in contact with the sub-flooring layer 110. The scrim 60 is in contact with the top flooring layer 120. The sub-flooring layer 110 may be made of any conventional sub-flooring material, for example, concrete, steel, wood, and the like. The top flooring layer 120 can also be made of any conventional top-flooring material including, for example, wood, gypsum concrete, and the like. The top flooring layer 120 may optionally have a finish flooring layer overlying the top flooring layer. The finish flooring layer, not shown in the drawings, may be made of any finish flooring layer material, for example, wood, linoleum, ceramic tile, and the like.

The resilient layer 30 may be of sufficient strength to support a top-flooring layer 120 with a weight in the range up to about 25 pounds per square foot, and in one embodiment in the range from about 5 to about 25 pounds per square foot, and in one embodiment in the range from about 8 to about 15 pounds per square foot.

An advantage of the inventive floor assembly 100 is that the sound control mat 10 gives or attenuates in response to impacting forces contacting the top flooring layer 120. This provides the effect of creating a sound break or spring between the flooring layers 120 and 110. This may result in the sub-flooring layer 110 receiving less of an impact from vibration which in turn may lower the level of sound heard by occupants in rooms above and/or below the floor assembly 100.

When the top flooring layer 120 comprises a poured floor, such as a gypsum concrete floor, the scrim 60 may become partially or completely embedded in the flooring layer 120, and this embedding may enhance the flexural strength of the flooring layer 120.

While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the mat 10 exhibits enhanced strength and resiliency, as well as enhanced sound attenuation properties, due to the shape of the resilient layer 30 with its plurality of waves forming a repeating pattern of peaks and valleys, and the construction of the fiberglass scrim 60. When installed in the floor assembly 100, resilient layer 30 gives or attenuates in response to impacting forces contacting the top flooring layer 120. This has the effect of creating a sound break or spring between the flooring layers 110 and 120. The sub-flooring layer 110 receives a reduced level of vibrational impact which in turn lowers the level of sound heard by occupants above or below the floor assembly 100. This give or attenuation is believed to be due, at least in part, to the shape of the waves 35 in the resilient layer 30. The peaked sections of waves 35 may at least partially give or depress in response to impacting forces contacting the top flooring layer 120 and then spring back once the impacting forces have ceased. This give or attenuation puts an outward stress on the legs 44 and 46 of the waves 35, which in turn transmits stress to the fiberglass scrim 60. The shape of the waves 35 with their extended width to length ratios of at least about 2:1 enhance the strength and stability of the resilient layer 30. The fiberglass scrim 60 provides the mat 10 with strength, stability and reinforcement. Because of the construction of the scrim 60 with multiple strands 68 and 70, the scrim 60 may give or stretch in response to the stress applied to it from the legs 44 and 46 of the waves 35 of the resilient layer 30. In this way the scrim 60 may mimic the movements of the resilient layer 30 when the mat 10 is subjected to vibrational impact.

While the invention has been explained in relation to various embodiments, it is to be understood that various modifications thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this specification. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention provided herein is intended to cover such modifications as may fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A floor assembly, comprising:

a sub-flooring layer;
a top-flooring layer overlying the sub-flooring layer; and
a sound control mat positioned between the sub-flooring layer and the top-flooring layer, the sound control mat comprising: a resilient layer of extruded polymer monofilaments, the polymer monofilaments being heat welded at junctions to form a matrix of tangled monofilaments, the resilient layer having a machine direction and a cross-direction, the resilient layer comprising a plurality of waves forming a repeating pattern of peaks and valleys, the waves extending in the machine direction and the cross-direction, each wave having a pair of legs, each leg extending from the peak of the wave to an adjacent valley, the average ratio of the width of the waves, as measured in the cross-direction, to the length of the waves, as measured in the machine direction, being at least about 2:1; and a fiberglass scrim bonded to the resilient layer at the valleys of the waves, the scrim comprising a plurality of fiberglass strands, the fiberglass strands comprising two sets of strands, the strands in one set of strands intersecting the strands in the other set of strands at angles of about 90°, the fiberglass scrim further comprising a water or moisture impermeable polymer coating extending between the two sets of strands; the resilient layer contacting the sub-flooring layer at the peak of the waves, the scrim contacting the top-flooring layer,
wherein the peaks of the waves are configured to at least partially compress upon application of an impacting force to the top-flooring layer and recover their pre-compressed shape upon release of the impacting force.

2. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the polymer monofilaments have an average diameter in the range from about 1 to about 4 mils.

3. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the thickness of the resilient layer has a major dimension in the range from about 0.1 to about 1 inch, and a minor dimension in the range from about 0.01 to about 0.04 inch.

4. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the mat has a porosity level in the range from about 75 to about 98 percent.

5. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the resilient layer comprises from about 25 to about 400 polymer monofilaments per foot as measured in the cross direction.

6. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the polymer monofilaments are made of a material comprising polyolefin, polyamide, polyester, polyvinylchloride, or a mixture of two or more thereof.

7. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the polymer monofilaments are made of a material comprising polyethylene, polypropylene, or a mixture thereof.

8. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the strands in one set of strands are aligned parallel to each other and extend lengthwise in the machine direction, and the strands in the other set of strands are aligned parallel to each other and extend in the cross-direction.

9. The floor assembly of claim 8 wherein the number of strands extending in the machine direction is in the range from about 1 to about 20 per inch of scrim as measured in the cross-direction; and the number of strands extending in the cross-direction is in the range from about 1 to about 20 per inch of scrim as measured in the machine direction.

10. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the fiberglass strands comprise a plurality of filaments.

11. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the fiberglass strands are made of a plurality of filaments, the filaments comprising fiberglass filaments and optionally polyester filaments.

12. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the polymer coating comprises a polyolefin, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl chloride, polyacrylate, styrene-butadiene rubber, or a mixture of two or more thereof.

13. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the fiberglass scrim comprises a polymer coating for binding the fiberglass strands, the polymer coating being derived from a polyvinyl chloride plastisol.

14. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the scrim has a thickness in the range from about 0.5 to about 1.5 mils.

15. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the mat has a weight in the range from about 1 to about 5 ounces per square foot.

16. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the mat is in the form of a roll.

17. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the average ratio of the width of each wave, as measured in the cross-direction, to the length of each wave, as measured in the machine direction, is at least about 10:1.

18. The floor assembly of claim 1 wherein the top-flooring layer comprises a poured floor, and at least part of the scrim is embedded in the top-flooring layer.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2069755 February 1937 Foster
2388968 November 1945 Hedgren
2799232 July 1957 Jaeger
2897109 July 1959 Voigtman
3122073 February 1964 Masse
3451758 June 1969 McClain
3468096 September 1969 Franz
3500618 March 1970 Sokol
3501878 March 1970 Segal
3596425 August 1971 Kodaras
3686049 August 1972 Manner et al.
3687759 August 1972 Werner et al.
3691004 September 1972 Werner et al.
3837988 September 1974 Hennen et al.
3847524 November 1974 Mott
3900102 August 1975 Hurst
4010748 March 8, 1977 Dobritz
4012249 March 15, 1977 Stapp
4073997 February 14, 1978 Richards et al.
4094380 June 13, 1978 Kobayashi
4211807 July 8, 1980 Yazawa et al.
4212692 July 15, 1980 Rasen et al.
4315392 February 16, 1982 Sylvest
4546024 October 8, 1985 Brown
4617219 October 14, 1986 Schupack
4681786 July 21, 1987 Brown
4685259 August 11, 1987 Eberhart et al.
4698249 October 6, 1987 Brown
4851277 July 25, 1989 Valkenburg et al.
4879856 November 14, 1989 Jones et al.
4942699 July 24, 1990 Spinelli
5031721 July 16, 1991 Barden et al.
5052157 October 1, 1991 Ducroux et al.
5099627 March 31, 1992 Coulton et al.
5187905 February 23, 1993 Pourtau et al.
5205091 April 27, 1993 Brown
5224315 July 6, 1993 Winter
5230189 July 27, 1993 Sourlis
5230192 July 27, 1993 Webb et al.
5259157 November 9, 1993 Ault
5343661 September 6, 1994 Sourlis
5369926 December 6, 1994 Borland
5383314 January 24, 1995 Rothberg
5489462 February 6, 1996 Sieber
5572842 November 12, 1996 Stief et al.
5584950 December 17, 1996 Gaffigan
5589242 December 31, 1996 Stief et al.
5598673 February 4, 1997 Atkins
5619832 April 15, 1997 Myrvold
5641950 June 24, 1997 Kotter
5652001 July 29, 1997 Perry et al.
5669192 September 23, 1997 Opdyke et al.
5673521 October 7, 1997 Coulton et al.
5730548 March 24, 1998 Brero et al.
5756942 May 26, 1998 Tanaka et al.
5867957 February 9, 1999 Holtrop
5902432 May 11, 1999 Coulton et al.
5907932 June 1, 1999 LeConte et al.
5937594 August 17, 1999 Sourlis
5960595 October 5, 1999 McCorsley, III et al.
5984044 November 16, 1999 Christensen
6023892 February 15, 2000 Sourlis
RE36676 May 2, 2000 Sourlis
6067781 May 30, 2000 Ford et al.
6112476 September 5, 2000 Schulenburg
6131353 October 17, 2000 Egan
6167668 January 2, 2001 Fine et al.
6171984 January 9, 2001 Paulson et al.
6253872 July 3, 2001 Neumann
6256955 July 10, 2001 Lolly et al.
6277024 August 21, 2001 Coulton
6298613 October 9, 2001 Coulton
6308472 October 30, 2001 Coulton
6355333 March 12, 2002 Waggoner et al.
6594965 July 22, 2003 Coulton
6662504 December 16, 2003 Krogstad
6676199 January 13, 2004 Buisson et al.
6759135 July 6, 2004 Bramlett et al.
6786013 September 7, 2004 Coulton
6804922 October 19, 2004 Egan
6817442 November 16, 2004 Van Sleet et al.
6883284 April 26, 2005 Burgunder et al.
6920723 July 26, 2005 Downey
6981916 January 3, 2006 Coulton
6983822 January 10, 2006 O'Regan et al.
6990775 January 31, 2006 Koester
7093395 August 22, 2006 Hinault et al.
7096630 August 29, 2006 Keene et al.
7182688 February 27, 2007 Coulton
7384331 June 10, 2008 Coulton
7393273 July 1, 2008 Ehrman et al.
7422520 September 9, 2008 Coulton et al.
7765761 August 3, 2010 Paradis
20020025751 February 28, 2002 Chen et al.
20020170648 November 21, 2002 Dinkel
20030033779 February 20, 2003 Downey
20030114055 June 19, 2003 Burton et al.
20030207640 November 6, 2003 Anderson et al.
20040129493 July 8, 2004 Campbell
20040182037 September 23, 2004 Sourlis
20050009428 January 13, 2005 Porter et al.
20050103568 May 19, 2005 Sapoval et al.
20050144901 July 7, 2005 Egan et al.
20050178613 August 18, 2005 Humphries et al.
20050194205 September 8, 2005 Guo
20050284059 December 29, 2005 Rerup
20050284690 December 29, 2005 Proscia et al.
20060117687 June 8, 2006 Ehrman et al.
20060144012 July 6, 2006 Manning et al.
20060230699 October 19, 2006 Keene
20070000198 January 4, 2007 Payne et al.
20070051069 March 8, 2007 Grimes
20070234650 October 11, 2007 Coulton et al.
20070261365 November 15, 2007 Keene
20070289238 December 20, 2007 Payne et al.
20080041005 February 21, 2008 Ehrman et al.
20080148669 June 26, 2008 Ehrman et al.
20080220714 September 11, 2008 Caruso et al.
20080289292 November 27, 2008 Giles et al.
20090025316 January 29, 2009 Coulton et al.
20090038249 February 12, 2009 Coulton et al.
20090241453 October 1, 2009 Dellinger et al.
20090242325 October 1, 2009 Dellinger et al.
20100229486 September 16, 2010 Keene
Other references
  • Construction Canada; Sep. 2000 Issue; pp. 14-16; “Controlling the Transmission of Impact Sound Through Floors”; Sep. 2000.
  • Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI 48674; five pages of information on “Styrofoam Weathermate Plus”; believed to be published 2003.
  • Colbond, Inc., Enka, NC 28728; four pages of information on Enka-Engineered “Enkasonic Sound Control Matting”; Jul. 2001.
  • Liner Rolpanit Incorporated North America, Toronto M6G3H1, four pages, entitled “Introducing a Unique Solution to Pitch Roof Vapor Control”; believed to be published 2003.
  • Keene Building Products, Website, Jan. 8, 2009, pp. 1-16, Quiet Qurl® noise control products.
Patent History
Patent number: 8528286
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 10, 2009
Date of Patent: Sep 10, 2013
Patent Publication Number: 20110107700
Assignee: Keene Building Products Co., Inc. (Mayfield Heights, OH)
Inventor: James R. Keene (Pepper Pike, OH)
Primary Examiner: Branon Painter
Application Number: 12/615,420
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Underlying Compressible Layer Or Pad (e.g., Floor Systems) (52/403.1); Absorbing Material Behind Foraminous Facing Sheet (52/145)
International Classification: E04F 15/22 (20060101);