Immunoglobulin preparations having increased stability

- ZLB Behring AG

The present invention relates to a protein preparation having increased stability, comprising a stabilizer selected from the group consisting of non-polar and basic amino acids and having a pH of 4.0 to 5.2. The invention further relates to a pharmaceutical composition and a method of stabilizing protein preparations.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/579,357, filed May 16, 2006 which is the U.S. national stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2004/013022, filed Nov. 17, 2004, which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 03026539.1, filed Nov. 18, 2003, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

The present invention relates to a protein preparation having increased stability, comprising a stabiliser selected from the group consisting of non-polar and basic amino acids and having a pH of 4.2 to 5.4. The invention further relates to a pharmaceutical composition and a method of stabilising protein preparations.

Protein preparations, in particular immunoglobulin preparations for intravenous injection, have been in use for quite some time. Proteins, and immunoglobulin in particular, tend to form aggregates and/or dimers and to fragment or denature. If such solutions are injected intravenously, aggregates can give rise to severe side reactions including anaphylactic shock. In order to avoid aggregation, fragmentation, etc in such protein solutions and to improve their stability, a number of treatments have been tried in the state of the art. For instance, intravenous IgG for clinical use are often lyophilised (freeze-dried) for improved stability on storage, but such preparations must be reconstituted with a diluent before use. The reconstitution step is inconvenient and time consuming and increases the likelihood of contamination of the product. Another way of improving immunoglobulin stability and storage that is well known in the art is the addition of protein-stabilising excipients to the IgG preparation. Known excipients include sugars, polyols, amino acids, amines, salts, polymers and surfactants. Such stabilisation strategies in protein pharmaceuticals are abundant in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,499,073 (Tenold) improves the stabilisation through the selection of pH and inonic strength. JP 54020124 discloses the addition of an amino acid to an intramuscular preparation to render it storage stable and safe. JP 57031623 and JP 57128635 disclose the use of arginine and/or lysine with NaCl in 5 to 15% IgG preparations to achieve long-term stability in an intramuscular preparation. JP 56127321 discloses the addition of a sugar alcohol to IgG which works better than the previously used glucose in suppressing aggregation. JP 4346934 discloses the use of low conductivity (less than 1 mmho), pH 5.3 to 5.7 and optionally one or more stabilisers including PEG, human serum albumin and mannitol. U.S. Pat. No. 4,439,421 (Hooper) teaches the addition of a hydrophilic macromolecule, a polyol and another protein to stabilise against ACA (anti-complement activity) generation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,098 (Sarno) discloses the stabilisation of isotonic solutions by the addition of amino acids (0.1 to 0.3 M glycine), and non-ionic detergents (polysorbate) and PEG. U.S. Pat. No. 4,186,192 (Lundblad) discloses various additives including amino acids, however, without specifying the use of single specific amino acids. This disclosure includes the stabilisation of IgG with maltose and additionally glycine to 0.1 M. U.S. Pat. No. 4,362,661 (Ono) discloses the use of neutral and basic amino acids to impart stability on a 5% IgG product. All the above mentioned documents disclose IgG preparations of an acidic but still relatively high pH of above 5.2.

In addition to preventing the formation of immunoglobulin aggregates, it has also been recognised that dimer formation, in particular of IgG, can be detrimental to IgG preparations for intravenous use. Although IgG dimers are not known to cause anaphylactic shock, it has nevertheless been found that IgG preparations with a high dimer content are less well tolerated on intravenous injection and can give rise to undesirable side effects including fever, nausea and sometimes lowered blood pressure. Hypotensive side effects have been detected in a rat model by Bleaker et al. (Vox Sanguinis 52, 281-290, 1987), and this also shows an apparent correlation with the dimer content. Dimer formation is less of a problem when an IgG preparation is lyophilised shortly after it is produced. However, if the preparation is intended for storage in non-lyophilised liquid form, dimer concentration increases with storage time.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,736 (Bruegger et al.) discloses immunoglobulin preparations, particularly liquid preparations of IgG for intravenous infusion which comprise one or more amphiphilic stabilisers in order to stabilise against dimer formation. The amphiphilic stabilisers include nicotinic acid and its derivatives, in particular nicotinamide, and, mainly in conjunction with the above, amino acids having uncharged lipophilic side chains, e.g. phenylalanine, methionine, leucine, isoleucine, proline and valine. The experimental disclosure of this prior art document discloses amino acids always in conjunction with nicotinamide, and the concentrations disclosed for the amino acids are 200 mmol/liter for proline, 80 mmol/liter for glycine and 120 mmol/liter for isoleucine.

The pH range for the preparations disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,736 is broadly given as being between 4 and 8, but the actual disclosure of the Examples teaches a pH of 5.3.

Although the above US patent discloses IgG preparations in which dimer formation has been suppressed to a certain degree, it is still desirable to provide protein preparations, in particular immunoglobulin preparations, which show improved stabilisation, in particular at ambient temperature.

The inventors have found that a surprisingly high degree of stabilisation of liquid protein preparations can be achieved by adjusting the pH of the final preparation to between 4.2 and 5.4 and by adding as a stabiliser, a basic or non-polar amino acid.

Thus, the present invention provides a protein preparation having improved stability wherein the preparation comprises one or more stabilisers selected from the group consisting of non-polar and basic amino acids. Exemplary non-polar and basic amino acids, useful for the purposes of the present invention are histidine, arginine, lysine, ornithine (basic amino acids) and, isoleucine, valine, methionine, glycine and proline (non-polar amino acids). Particularly useful is proline. The stabiliser may be an amino acid of the group of non-polar or basic amino acids on its own, or it may be a combination of 2 or more such amino acids. The amino acids are preferably not used in combination with nicotinamide. The amino acid stabilisers may be natural amino acids, amino acid analogues, modified amino acids or amino acid equivalents. L-amino acids are preferred. When proline is used as the stabiliser, it is preferably L-proline. It is also possible to use proline equivalents, e.g. proline analogues.

Surprisingly, it was found that the addition of amino acids on their own, without other stabilisers (such as nicotinamide), and the adjustment of the pH of the final preparation markedly increases the stability of those preparations, particularly at ambient temperature. The increased stability is demonstrated by better stability of the preparations at temperatures between about 2° C. and about 40° C., particularly at ambient temperature which preferably ranges from about 10° C., more preferably from about 15° C., more preferably from about 20° C. to about 30° C., most preferably to about 25° C. The increased stability of the preparations of the invention is also visible at higher temperatures of about 30° C. to about 40° C., including body temperature of about 37° C. Preferably, the increased stability is alternatively or additionally further defined as improved storage time, decreased fragmentation, decreased aggregate formation, decreased dimer formation or/and decreased discolouring. The improved storage time means that the preparations of the invention are preferably stable for at least 30 days, preferably at least 60 days, more preferably at least 90 days, more preferably at least 120 days, more preferably even longer than that.

Decreased aggregation preferably means that the preparations show a lower percentage of aggregates (in particular in case of Ig) than conventional preparations. Preferably, the dimer content of the preparations is below about 12%, preferably below about 10%, more preferably below about 8%. Decreased colouring preferably means that the optical density of the formulations of the invention is between about 20% and 60% lower than of conventional formulations.

In general, the protein preparations of the present invention are liquid formulations which are useful for intravenous injection. Such preparations can be stored and are stable in liquid form and thus do not require lyophilisation or other treatment and can be readily used.

Preferably, the protein preparation is an immunoglobulin preparation, in particular an antibody preparation wherein the antibodies may be of any idiotype but preferably IgG, IgA or IgM. IgG preparations are particularly preferred. The immunoglobulins can be polyclonal or monoclonal and can be isolated from human or animal blood or produced by other means, for instance by recombinant DNA technology or hybridoma technology. In general, immunoglobulins are obtained from blood plasma by alcohol fractionation, which may be combined with other purification techniques like chromatography, adsorption or precipitation. The immunoglobulins may be treated with trace amounts of enzymes (e.g. pepsin) in order to reduce anti-complementary activity or they may be used whole.

The preparations can be obtained by methods known in the art, except that the pH of the final preparation is adjusted to a relatively high but acidic pH, namely in the range of about pH 4.2 to 5.4. It has been found that this pH range is particularly useful for improving the storage of characteristics of immunoglobulin preparations. The pH range is preferably from 4.5 to about 5.2, a pH range of about 4.6 to 5.0 being particularly preferred, pH 4.8 being especially preferred.

In the course of developing the preparations according to the present invention, it was also found that increasing the final concentration of the stabiliser allows a surprising improvement in the storage characteristics and stability of the preparations. The stabiliser is therefore added to a final concentration of at least 0.2 M. Preferably, the final concentration is between 0.2 M and 0.4 M, more preferably between 0.2 M and 0.3 M, most preferably 0.25 M.

The present invention is particularly useful for protein preparations with a relatively high protein concentration. The final preparation of the present invention has a protein concentration of about 5 to 25% w/v, preferably about 6 to 15% w/v, more preferably about 8 to 12% w/v, most preferably about 10% w/v. The final protein concentration will depend on various factors, such as the administration route, the type of condition to be treated, etc. The skilled person will be able to determine the optimal protein concentration for the intended application. For example, for intravenous infusion, the final preparation of the invention preferably has a protein concentration of about 15 to 20% w/v, preferably about 8 to 12% w/v. In the case of IgG for intravenous use, 10% w/v, i.e. 100 g IgG/liter is particularly useful. For subcutaneous administration a higher dosage may be chosen, for instance about 15 to 20% w/v.

The present invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising the protein preparation of the present invention as well as pharmaceutically acceptable additives. Such additives can be excipients, diluents such as water, and other substances such as non-buffering substances, for example sodium chloride, glycine, sucrose, maltose and sorbitol. Such pharmaceutical compositions may be administered via various routes. For intravenous administration, a dosage of about 0.2 g, preferably 0.5 g to about 2.0 g of immunoglobulin/kilogram of body weight per day may be used.

A further aspect of the present invention is a method of stabilising protein preparations, in particular immunoglobulin preparations, comprising providing an aqueous protein solution and adding one or more stabilisers selected from the group consisting of basic and non-polar amino acids, wherein the pH of the solution is adjusted to a pH of about 4.2 to 5.4. The pH is preferably adjusted to a value within the preferred ranges given above, pH 4.8 being particularly preferred. The method preferably comprises adjusting the protein concentrations and stabiliser concentrations and choosing the stabiliser or stabilisers as stated above, proline being particularly preferred.

In particular, the method comprises the steps of providing an aqueous protein solution with a protein concentration of about 5 to 25% w/v, adjusting the pH of the solution to 4.2 to 5.4, and adding one or more stabilisers selected from the group listed above to the solution to give a final stabiliser concentration of 0.2 to 0.4 M to obtain a stable protein preparation. A number of processes are known to isolate immunoglobulins from human plasma or fractions thereof. Immunoglobulins can for example be purified by cold ethanol fractionation and/or octanoic acid fractionation and/or chromatographic procedures. Purification methods that are particularly preferred for the purposes of the present invention include ethanol fractionation, followed by octanoic acid fractionation, followed by low pH treatment, chromatography and nanofiltration. In producing immunoglobulins for intravenous applications such as those for the present invention, special care should preferably be taken to reduce or eliminate immune complexes with anti-complement activity and proteases like kallikrein or plasminogen. The protein to be used in the protein preparations of the present invention is brought to the desired concentration of between about 5 and 25% w/v by known methods, e.g. by ultrafiltration. The pH of the liquid protein preparation is adjusted to a pH of 4.2 to 5.4, and the stabiliser is added to the solution at a final concentration of at least about 0.2 M. Preferably, proline is used as the stabiliser, and it is preferably added at a concentration of about 0.2 M to 0.4 M, preferably about 0.25 M.

The present invention will now be illustrated by means of the following examples and figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

FIG. 1 shows the aggregate content as determined by HPLC for an 8% IgG solution containing either 0.25 M proline or 0.25 M glycine.

FIG. 2 shows the dimer content as determined by HPLC for an 8% IgG solution containing either 0.25 M proline or 0.25 M glycine.

FIG. 3 shows fragment content as determined by SDS PAGE of 8% IgG solutions containing either 0.25 M proline or 0.25 M glycine.

FIG. 4 shows the optical density (UV350-500 nm) of two IgG solutions containing 0.25 M proline or 0.25 M glycine.

 EXAMPLE 1 Manufacture of a Protein Preparation According to the Invention

The starting material for the intravenous Ig manufacturing process is a licensed intermediate of the Kistler Nitschmann ethanol fractionation process. It is a precipitation of the immunoglobulin fraction from plasma using 19% ethanol at pH 5.8.

High molecular weight proteins, lipoprotein complexes, and other contaminants were precipitated using octanoic acid and were then separated via filtration in the presence of a filter aid. The supernatant was then concentrated before being subjected to a low pH incubation step.

The pH was then adjusted to pH 6.5 and the material further clarified by filtration to remove precipitated IgA and IgM. The IgG-enriched solution was then finally purified on an anion exchange resin, according to U.S. Pat. No. 6,093,324, except that the loading was 150 g per liter resin.

Viral elimination was achieved by using a nanofilter.

Formulation:

The nanofiltrate was concentrated to 3% protein and diafiltered against 5 volumes of water, followed by concentration of the IgG to 120 g per liter. Finally, the concentrate was stabilised with 250 mM L-proline, diluted to 100 g IgG per liter and the pH was maintained at pH 4.8. The formulated bulk was filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane filter.

EXAMPLE 2 Testing of IgG Preparations According to the Invention

IgG concentrate, purified from plasma by a combination of precipitation steps and chromatography and virus inactivated according to Example 1 was split into three portions with 260 ml formulated to pH 4.5, 420 ml formulated to pH 4.8 and 260 ml formulated to pH 5.1. The formulations were then divided, with one half being formulated with 0.25 M glycine and the other with 0.25 M proline. The final protein concentration was 8% w/v. Aliquots of 10 ml were dispensed in 10 ml Type I glass vials (Type I rubber stoppers).

The aliquots were stored at three different temperatures, 2-8° C., 26° C. and 45° C. The samples at 2-8° C. were stored in the presence of light (Phillips TLD 18W/33). Samples were incubated at either 26° C. or 45° C. for at least two months in the dark. The results are shown in FIGS. 1 to 4.

Aggregates

The aggregate levels for IgG formulated with glycine were higher than those formulated with proline under all conditions tested.

Significant aggregate formation was promoted by incubation at 45° C. This was similar for both proline and glycine formulations. Lower pH promoted aggregate formation at 45° C., with the pH 4.5 formulations containing 12.2% (proline) and 16.7% (glycine) aggregate at 90 days. In contrast, the pH 5.1 formulations contained 6.3% (proline) and 8.3% (glycine) aggregate at 90 days.

Dimers

The dimer levels were influenced by pH, temperature and excipient type. The pH proved the most important factor, with increased dimer levels observed as the pH of the formulation increased. This was observed for both glycine and proline formulations. The results indicate that formulations containing proline are capable of maintaining lower dimer levels than comparable glycine formulations. The incubation temperature modulates the monomer/dimer equilibrium, with lower temperatures favouring the formation of dimers.

Monomers and Dimers

The combined monomer/dimer content for all formulations at 2-8° C. and 26° C. remained above 90%. Lower levels were observed in IgG solutions formulated with glycine due to their higher aggregate content. Incubation at 45° C. resulted in three formulations having levels below 90% after 60 days (85.1% glycine, pH 4.5, 89.1% proline, pH 4.5 and 89.1% glycine, pH 4.8). Again, these results highlight the increased ability of proline over glycine to preserve the molecular integrity of IgG molecules.

IgG Fragments

The results indicate that the glycine formulations contain slightly lower fragment levels as compared to proline. Incubation temperature and pH proved to be the most important factors influencing IgG fragmentation. At 45° C. the fragment levels for proline formulations range from 5.2% (pH 5.1) to 5.8% (pH 4.5); while the glycine formulations ranged from 4.3% (pH 5.1) to 4.8% (pH 4.8). At elevated pH (4.8-5.1) there was less fragmentation.

Appearance of the Solution

Four main parameters were investigated: clarity, turbidity, particles and visible colouring. Parameters such as appearance, clarity and turbidity were satisfactory. Colouring (yellow/brown) of the solutions occurred during the incubation period and was related to both the incubation temperature and light exposure. The colouring of the IgG formulations was monitored using the optical density test (UV350-500 nm). Increased colour was associated with exposure to light and increased incubation temperatures. The glycine formulations exhibited optical densities that were between 25% and 48% higher than the corresponding proline formulations. These results provide further evidence that proline is a better stabiliser than glycine in IgG solutions. At elevated pH (4.8-5.1) there was less colouration than at lower pH (4.5).

EXAMPLE 3 Stability of IgG Preparations According to the Invention (pH Dependence)

IgG concentrate, purified from plasma by a combination of precipitation steps and chromatography and virus inactivated according to Example 1 was split into two portions and formulated with or without 400 mmol/L L-proline at pH 4.2, 4.8, 5.3 and 6.8. The final protein concentration was 12% w/v. Aliquots of 10 ml were dispensed into glass vials and incubated at 40° C. for at least 3 months in the dark. At time 0 and after 90 days incubation samples were analysed by HPLC for aggregates, dimeric, monomeric IgG, by photometry for absorbance at 350-500 nm, by SDS PAGE (fragments) and specific antibodies directed against hepatitis virus B surface antigen (anti-HBs). The results presented in Table 1 show that best stability of the IgG solution is obtained at a moderate acidic pH of 4.8 to 5.3.

TABLE 1 pH dependence of the stability of a protein preparation (10%) according to the invention pH 4.2 4.8 5.3 6.8 Incubation time (days) 0 90 0 90 0 90 0 90 Additive none Aggregate (%) 3.5 40.2 1.16 5 1.31 3.1 3.22 2.7 Dimer (%) 6.5 3.6 10.6 11.1 12.2 13.8 16.4 19.0 Fragments (%) 1.4 2.6 1.3 3.5 1.3 3.6 1.5 3.4 Absorbance (350-500 nm) 0.107 0.159 0.125 0.186 0.156 0.205 0.355 0.936 anti-HBs (IU/ml) 7.0 2.6 6.5 3.5 6.3 3.5 6.3 3.5 Additive L-Proline (400 mMol/L) Aggregate (%) 1.97 26.4 0.82 4.5 0.85 2.5 1.78 2.9 Dimer (%) 4.3 4 6.4 6.2 7.8 9.5 11.8 13.9 Fragments (%) 1.4 2.9 1.3 3.5 1.3 4.0 1.5 3.6 Absorbance (350-500 nm) 0.202 0.234 0.134 0.213 0.125 0.235 0.249 0.55 anti-HBs (IU/ml) 7.0 2.9 6.5 3.5 6.3 4.0 6.3 3.6

EXAMPLE 4 Stability of IgG Preparations According to the Invention Formulated with Different Additives

IgG concentrates, purified from plasma by a combination of precipitation steps and chromatography and virus inactivated according to Example 1 were formulated with additives of different substance classes (sugars and sugar alcohols, amino acids, detergents) at pH 4.2, 4.8, 5.3 and 6.8. The final protein concentration was 10% w/v. Aliquots of 10 ml were dispensed into glass vials and incubated at 37° C. or 40° C. for at least 3 months in the dark. After 90 days incubation samples were analysed by HPLC for aggregates, dimeric, monomeric. IgG and fragments, by photometry for absorbance at 350-500 nm and by ELISA for specific antibodies directed against hepatitis virus B surface antigen (anti-HBs).

The results presented in Table 2 show that best stability of the IgG solution is obtained at a moderate acidic pH of 4.8 or 5.3 with the most favorable formulations with L-proline.

TABLE 2 Stability of a protein preparation (10%) according to the invention formulated with different additives and at different pH. Absorbance HPLC anti-HBs Inc. Temp. Additive 350-500 nm Aggregates % Dimers % Monomers % Fragments % IU/mL pH 4.2 37° C. D(−)Mannit (10%) 0.134 3.00 4.19 87.37 5.44 1.63 Saccharose (10%) 0.271 3.18 3.38 87.87 5.57 1.59 Maltose (10%) 0.422 5.30 3.83 85.54 5.33 1.42 Glycine (250 mmol/L) 0.177 5.82 3.75 84.64 5.79 1.57 L-Proline (250 mmol/L) 0.166 5.50 2.98 85.87 5.64 1.70 Polysorbat 80 (0.02%) 0.166 7.03 3.54 83.94 5.49 1.53 none 0.172 7.83 3.67 83.11 5.39 1.52 40° C. Glycine (400 mmol/L) 0.251 22.06 5.27 68.59 4.08 2.44 L-Proline (400 mmol/L) 0.231 26.38 3.96 65.77 3.89 2.87 L-Isoleucine (200 mmol/L) 0.257 52.03 2.59 41.25 4.13 1.74 L--Methionine (200 mmol/L) 0.175 37.66 3.32 55.41 3.61 2.44 L-Valine (250 mmol/L) 0.197 29.30 4.40 62.67 3.63 2.66 pH 4.8 37° C. D(−)Mannit (10%) 0.147 3.45 7.08 86.84 2.62 1.93 Saccharose (10%) 0.195 0.73 6.07 90.24 2.96 1.66 Maltose (10%) 0.489 0.97 7.66 88.41 2.96 1.73 Glycine (250 mmol/L) 0.242 1.37 7.05 88.64 2.94 1.94 L-Proline (250 mmol/L) 0.183 0.99 4.90 91.17 2.94 2.25 Polysorbat 80 (0.02%) 0.166 1.25 7.14 88.75 2.86 1.94 none 0.165 1.29 7.54 88.30 2.87 1.94 40° C. Glycine (400 mmol/L) 0.241 3.79 10.42 83.47 2.32 3.77 L-Proline (400 mmol/L) 0.213 4.47 7.09 85.96 2.48 3.54 L-Isoleucine (200 mmol/L) 0.488 4.88 9.67 83.27 2.18 3.87 L--Methionine (200 mmol/L) 0.174 5.93 7.46 84.08 2.53 3.83 L-Valine (250 mmol/L) 0.207 6.48 9.58 81.53 2.41 3.71 pH 5.3 37° C. D(−)Mannit (10%) 0.179 1.39 10.49 85.62 2.50 1.84 Saccharose (10%) 0.185 0.61 8.46 88.36 2.57 1.88 Maltose (10%) 0.516 0.76 11.04 85.51 2.69 1.70 Glycine (250 mmol/L) 0.263 0.98 9.09 87.59 2.34 1.92 L-Proline (250 mmol/L) 0.195 0.78 7.34 89.58 2.30 2.20 Polysorbat 80 (0.02%) 0.196 0.94 9.56 86.94 2.56 1.91 none 0.177 0.93 10.13 86.40 2.53 1.90 40° C. Glycine (400 mmol/L) 0.336 2.82 12.75 82.43 2.00 3.92 L-Proline (400 mmol/L) 0.235 2.49 9.54 85.90 2.07 4.02 L-Isoleucine (200 mmol/L) 0.275 4.14 11.06 82.76 2.04 3.73 L--Methionine (200 mmol/L) 0.207 3.21 9.67 84.42 2.71 3.58 L-Valine (250 mmol/L) 0.253 4.26 12.00 81.30 2.44 3.93 pH 6.8 37° C. D(−)Mannit (10%) 0.300 4.94 12.14 80.25 2.67 1.61 Saccharose (10%) 0.270 0.95 12.19 84.16 2.70 1.89 Maltose (10%) 1.008 5.96 16.81 74.46 2.77 1.34 Glycine (250 mmol/L) 0.807 1.19 12.34 84.39 2.08 1.87 L-Proline (250 mmol/L) 0.328 1.10 10.89 85.87 2.14 1.90 Polysorbat 80 (0.02%) 0.308 1.50 13.85 81.74 2.92 1.60 none 0.344 1.40 13.68 81.91 3.00 1.73 40° C. Glycine (400 mmol/L) 1.063 3.00 16.61 78.08 2.32 3.72 L-Proline (400 mmol/L) 0.550 2.89 13.95 80.69 2.47 3.61 L-Isoleucine (200 mmol/L) 0.840 4.47 15.38 77.77 2.38 3.87 L--Methionine (200 mmol/L) 0.687 2.96 13.68 79.79 3.57 3.66 L-Valine (250 mmol/L) 1.083 4.62 15.16 75.33 4.89 3.13

Claims

1. A liquid IgG preparation, comprising a polyclonal IgG concentrate purified from pooled human blood plasma and a stabilizer consisting essentially of proline, wherein the preparation has a pH of about 4.2 to about 5.4, and wherein the preparation is not lyophilized prior to administration.

2. The preparation of claim 1, wherein said preparation has a pH of about 4.6 to about 5.0.

3. The preparation of claim 1, wherein the proline is L-proline and the concentration of the L-proline in the preparation is from 0.2 to 0.4 M, and wherein the concentration of IgG in the preparation is 6-15% w/v.

4. The preparation of claim 1, wherein the proline is L-proline and the concentration of the L-proline in the preparation is from 0.2 to 0.3 M, and wherein the concentration of IgG in the preparation is 8-12% w/v.

5. The preparation of claim 4, wherein the concentration of IgG in the preparation is 10% w/v.

6. The preparation of claim 1, wherein the proline is L-proline and the concentration of the L-proline in the preparation is from 0.2 to 0.4 M, and wherein the concentration of IgG in the preparation is 15-20% w/v.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4186192 January 29, 1980 Lundblad et al.
4360451 November 23, 1982 Schmolka
4362661 December 7, 1982 Ono et al.
4396608 August 2, 1983 Tenold
4439421 March 27, 1984 Hooper et al.
4499073 February 12, 1985 Tenold
4849508 July 18, 1989 Magnin et al.
4880913 November 14, 1989 Doleschel et al.
5164487 November 17, 1992 Kothe et al.
5177194 January 5, 1993 Sarno et al.
5503827 April 2, 1996 Woog et al.
5593675 January 14, 1997 Hodler et al.
5871736 February 16, 1999 Bruegger et al.
5945098 August 31, 1999 Sarno et al.
6069236 May 30, 2000 Burnouf-Radosevich et al.
6093324 July 25, 2000 Bertolini et al.
6162904 December 19, 2000 Mamidi et al.
6171586 January 9, 2001 Lam et al.
6252055 June 26, 2001 Relton
6303113 October 16, 2001 Woog et al.
20050142139 June 30, 2005 Schulke et al.
20070122402 May 31, 2007 Bolli et al.
20120308557 December 6, 2012 Bolli et al.
20130017191 January 17, 2013 Maeder et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2004290899 March 2010 AU
2272245 May 1998 CA
2272245 May 1998 CA
2 364 792 July 1974 DE
3 430 320 March 1985 DE
4 118 912 July 1992 DE
0 025 275 March 1981 EP
0 037 078 October 1981 EP
0 187 712 July 1986 EP
0 196 761 October 1986 EP
0 392 717 October 1990 EP
0 437 622 July 1991 EP
0 528 313 February 1993 EP
0 447 585 May 1995 EP
0 702 960 March 1996 EP
0 852 951 July 1998 EP
0 893 450 January 1999 EP
0 911 037 April 1999 EP
1 268 551 February 2004 EP
1 084 147 September 2004 EP
1 532 983 May 2005 EP
S54-20124 February 1979 JP
S56-127321 October 1981 JP
S57-31623 February 1982 JP
S57-128635 August 1982 JP
60-120823 June 1985 JP
61-194035 August 1986 JP
H04-346934 December 1992 JP
05-178719 July 1993 JP
H06-510031 November 1994 JP
H08-99899 April 1996 JP
H10-502938 March 1998 JP
2001-503781 March 2001 JP
2001-519770 October 2001 JP
WO 94/29334 December 1994 WO
WO 96/07429 March 1996 WO
WO 96/15153 May 1996 WO
WO 98/05686 February 1998 WO
WO 98/28007 July 1998 WO
WO 98/28007 July 1998 WO
WO 99/64462 December 1999 WO
WO 02/080976 October 2002 WO
WO 02/080976 October 2002 WO
WO 2004/084816 October 2004 WO
WO 2005/049078 June 2005 WO
WO 2005/049078 June 2005 WO
WO 2011/095543 August 2011 WO
WO 2011/104315 September 2011 WO
Other references
  • European Search Report dated Apr. 28, 2004, for European Patent Application No. 03026539.1 (10 pages).
  • PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 27, 2005, for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2004/013022 (15 pages).
  • Notice of the Reason of Rejection dispatched Jul. 13, 2010, for Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-540301 (3 pages) with translation (4 pages).
  • Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2011, for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,545,939 (3 pages).
  • Extended European Search Report dated May 4, 2012, for European Patent Application No. 10177786.0 (9 pages).
  • Notice of Opposition dated Jun. 28, 2013, for European Patent No. 1687028 (21 pages).
  • T. Arakawa et al., “The Stabilization of Proteins by Osmolytes,” Biophys. J., 47:411-414, (1985).
  • T. Arakawa et al., “Protein-Solvent Interactions in Pharmaceutical Formulations,” Pharmaceutical Research, 8(3): 285-291 (1991).
  • W.K. Bleeker et al., “An Animal Model for the Detection of Hypotensive Side Effects of Immunoglobulin Preparations,” Vox Sang., 52: 281-290 (1987).
  • J.F. Carpenter et al., “Cryoprotection of Phosphofructokinase with Organic Solutes: Characterization of Enhanced Protection in the Presence of Divalent Cations,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 250(2): 505-512 (1986).
  • K.C. Hazen et al., “Cryoprotection of Antibody by Organic Solutes and Organic Solute/Divalent Cation Mixtures,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 267(1): 363-371 (1988).
  • D.A. Parkins et al., “The Formulation of Biopharmaceutical Products,” Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today, 3(4): 129-137 (2000).
  • D. Samuel et al., “Proline is a Protein Solubilizing Solute,” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology International, 41(2): 235-242 (1997).
  • D. Samuel et al., “Proline Inhibits Aggregation During Protein Refolding,” Protein Science, 9: 344-352 (2000).
  • L.T. Smith “Characterization of a γ-Glutamyl Kinase from Escherichia coli That Confers Proline Overproduction and Osmotic Tolerance,” Journal of Bacteriology, 164(3): 1088-1093 (1985).
  • S. Taneja et al., “Increased Thermal Stability of Proteins in the Presence of Amino Acids,” Biochem. J., 303: 147-153 (1994).
  • D.L. Tankersley et al., “Immunoglobulin G Dimer: An Idiotype—Anti-Idiotype Complex,” Molecular Immunology, 25(1): 41-48 (1988).
  • R. Bolli et al., “L-Proline reduces IgG dimer content and enhances the stability of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) solutions,” Biologicals, 38: 150-157 (2010).
  • M. Cramer et al., “Stability over 36 months of a new liquid 10% polyclonal immunoglobulin product (IgPro10, Privigen©) stabilized with L-proline,” Vox Sanguinis, 96: 219-225 (2009).
  • S. Misbah et al., “Subcutaneous immunoglobulin: opportunities and outlook,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 158 (Suppl. 1): 51-59 (2009).
  • Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Patent App. No. PCT/EP2011/051556, mailed Feb. 28, 2011 (15 pages).
  • Extended European Search Report and European Search Opinion for European Patent App. No. 10 001 164.2, mailed Jul. 19, 2010 (10 pages).
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration package insert for HIZENTRA, Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% Liquid, issued Feb., 2010 (26 pages).
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration package insert for PRIVIGEN™, Immune Globulin Intravenous (Human), 10% Liquid, issued Jul., 2007 (20 pages).
  • International Blood/Plasma News, “CSL BEHRING announced that the U.S. FDA has approved a supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) that extends the shelf life of its Privigen 10% liquid intravenous immunoglobulin product from 24 months to 36 months,” p. 12, Apr. 2010.
  • D.L. Tankersley, “Dimer Formation in Immunoglobulin Preparations and Speculations on the Mechanism of Action of Intravenous Immune Globulin in Autoimmune Diseases,” Immunological Reviews 139: 159-172 (1994).
  • CSL Behring press release, “CSL Behring Receives FDA Approval to Extend Shelf Life of Hizentra® from 18 months to 24 months,” Aug. 18, 2010 (2 pages).
  • H. Lilie, “Folding of the Fab fragment within the intact antibody,” FEBS Lett. 417: 239-242 (1997).
  • M.O. Spycher et al., “Well-tolerated liquid intravenous immunoglobulin G preparations (IVIG) have a low immunoglobulin G dimer (IgG-dimer) content,” J. Autoimmun. 96 (Suppl. 1): 96 (1996).
  • R. Bolli et al. “IgG-dimer formation in liquid immunoglobulin preparations is inhibited by nicotinamide and other amphiphilic compounds,” J. Autoimmun. 96 (Suppl. 1): 96 (1996).
  • G. Lemm, “Composition and properties of IVIg preparations that affect tolerability and therapeutic efficacy,” Neurology 59(Suppl. 6): S28-S32 (2002).
  • W. Wang, “Instability, stabilization, and formulation of liquid protein pharmaceuticals,” Int. J. Pharmaceutics 185: 129-188 (1999).
  • B. Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell 3rd Ed. 1994, cover pages and p. G-12.
  • A.K. Abbas et al., Cellular and Molecular Immunology 4th Ed. 2000, cover pages and pp. 470 and 482.
  • I. Andresen et al., “Product equivalence study comparing the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmachodynamics of various human immunoglobulin-G formulations,” J. Clin Pharmacol, vol. 40, pp. 722-730 (2000).
  • T.K.S. Kumar et al., “The Role of Proline in the Prevention of Aggregation During Protein Folding in Vitro,” Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int., 46(3): 509-517 (1998).
  • K. Shiraki et al. “Biophysical Effect of Amino Acids on the Prevention of Protein Aggregation,” J. Biochem., 132(4): 591-595 (2002).
  • English Language Derwent abstract of JP 05-178719 A, 1993.
  • English Language Derwent abstract of JP 60-120823 A, 1985.
  • English Language Derwent abstract of JP 61-194035 A, 1986.
  • I. Andersson et al., “An Improved Chromatography Method for Production of IgG from Human Plasma,” Presented at XXIII Congress of the International Society of Blood Transfusion (1994).
  • J.-P. Azulay et al., “Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Patients With Motor Neuron Syndromes Associated With Anti-GM1 Antibodies, A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study,” Neurology, 44: 429-432 (1994).
  • M. Basta et al., “High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin Exerts its Beneficial Effect in Patients with Dermatomyositis by Blocking Endomysial Deposition of Activated Complement Fragments,” J. Clin. Invest., 94: 1729-1735 (1994).
  • S.A. Berkman et al., “Clinical Uses of Intravenous Immunoglobulins,” Annals Internal Medicine, 112: 278-292 (1990).
  • L. Biesert, “Virus Validation Studies of Immunoglobulin Preparations,” Clin. Exp. Rheumatol., 14(Suppl. 15): S47-S52 (1996).
  • J. Bjorkander et al., “1040 Prophylactic Infusions with an Unmodified Intravenous Immunoglobulin Product Causing Few Side-Effects in Patients with Antibody Deficiency Syndromes,” Infection, 13(3): 102-110 (1985).
  • B. Brenner, “Clinical Experience With Octagam, A Solvent Detergent (SD) Virus Inactivated Intravenous Gammaglobulin,” Clin. Exp. Rheumatol., 14(Suppl. 15): S115-S119 (1996).
  • R.H. Buckley et al., “The Use of Intravenous Immune Globulin in Immunodeficiency Diseases,” New Eng. J. Med., 325(2): 110-117 (1991).
  • P. Cassulis et al., “Ligand Affinity Chromatographic Separation of Serum IgG on Recombinant Protein G-Silica,” Clin. Chem., 37(6): 882-886 (1991).
  • M.-F. Clerc et al., “Labelling of Colloidal Gold with IgE,” Histochemistry, 89: 343-349 (1988).
  • Cooperative Group for the Study of Immunoglobulin in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, “Intravenous Immunoglobulin for the Prevention of Infection in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial,” New Eng. J. Med., 319: 902-907 (1998).
  • M.C. Dalakas, “Intravenous Immune Globulin Therapy for Neurologic Diseases,” Ann. Int. Med., 126(9): 721-730 (1997).
  • J.M. Dwyer, “Manipulating the Immune System with Immune Globulin,” New Eng. J. Med., 326(2): 107-116 (1992).
  • S. El Alaoui et al., “Development of an Immunocapture Method for Measuring IgA Antibodies to Tissue Transglutaminase in the Sera of Patients with Coeliac Disease,” Clin. Exp. Immunol., 144: 101-109 (2006).
  • Gammagard S/D, “Humanes Immunoglobulin Zur Intravenosen Anwendung Solvent/Detergent Behandelt,” Product Information, Baxter Deutschland GmbH, Edisonstr. 3-4, D-85716 Unterschleibheim, Germany (1994).
  • A.F.S.A. Habeeb et al., “Preparation of Human Immunoglobulin by Caprylic Acid Precipitation,” Preparative Biochem., 4(1): 1-17 (1984).
  • P. Hansen et al., “Isolation and Purification of Immunoglobulins from Chicken Eggs Using Thiophilic Interaction Chromatography,” J. Immunol. Meth., 215: 1-7 (1998).
  • J.R. Harris, Ed., “Blood Separation and Plasma Fractionation,” pp. 332-333, Wiley-Liss, New York (1991).
  • H. Hocini et al., “An ELISA Method to Measure Total and Specific Human Secretory IgA Subclasses Based on Selective Degradation by IgA1-Protease,” J. Immunol. Meth., 235(1-2): 53-60 (2000) (Abstract).
  • S.-V. Kaveri et al., “Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIg) in the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases,” Clin. Exp. Immunol., vol. 86, pp. 192-198 (1991).
  • W.J. Koopman et al., “A Sensitive Radioimmunoassay for Quantitation of IgM Rheumatoid Factor,” Arth. Rheum., 23(3): 302-308 (1980).
  • J.L. Lundblad et al., “Comparative Studies of Impurities in Intravenous Immunoglobulin Preparations,” The University of Chicago, Rev. Infectious Diseases, 8(Supp. 4): S382-S390 (1986).
  • J.P. McCue, “Changes in Therapeutic Proteins Caused by Preparation Techniques,” Ann. Internal Medicine, 111(4): 271-272 (1989).
  • T.E. Mollnes et al., “Effect of Whole and Fractionated Intravenous Immunoglobulin on Complement in Vitro,” Mol. Immunol., 34(10): 719-729 (1997).
  • N. Nourichafi et al., “Comparison of various chromatographic supports for purifying human plasmatic immunoglobulins from Cohn II + III fraction,” Biotech. Blood Proteins, 227: 207-212 (1993).
  • U.E. Nydegger, “Sepsis and Polyspecific Intravenous Immunoglobulins,” J. Clin. Apheresis, 12: 93-99 (1997).
  • G. Oldham et al., “A Quantitative Method for Measuring in vitro Synthesis of IgA and IgG by Human Rectal Mucosa: Studies on normal controls and patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia,” Immunol., 37: 661-668 (1979).
  • R.K. Scopes, “Protein Purification, Principles and Practice,” 2nd Edition, pp. 42-45, in “Springer Advance Texts in Chemistry,” Charles R. Cantor Ed., Springer-Verlag, N.Y. (1987).
  • M. Stucki et. al., “Characterisation of a Chromatographically Produced Anti-D Immunoglobulin Product,” J. Chromatograph B., 700: 241-248 (1997).
  • F.B. Waldo et al., “Mixed IgA-IgG Aggregates As a Model of Immune Complexes in IgA Nephropathy,” J. Immunol., 142(11): 3841-3846 (1989).
  • W. Wang, “Antibody Structure, Instability, and Formulation,” J. Pharm. Sci., 96(1): 1-26 (2007).
  • J.V. Wells et al., “Cord Serum IgA Levels in Australian Infants,” J. Paediatrics Child Health, 16(3): 189-90 (1980) (Abstract).
  • English Language Derwent abstract of DE 2 364 792, 1974.
  • English Language Derwent abstract of DE 3 430 320 A1, 1985.
  • English Language Derwent abstract of DE 4 118 912 C1, 1986.
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), “Guidance for Industry Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products, Revision 2,” Nov. 2003 (25 pages).
  • Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Patent App. No. PCT/EP2011/052770, mailed Jun. 9, 2011 (9 pages).
  • Extended European Search Report and European Search Opinion for European Patent App. No. 10 001 996.7, mailed Aug. 6, 2010 (5 pages).
  • J.L. Cleland et al., “The Development of Stable Protein Formulations: A Close Look at Protein Aggregation, Deamidation, and Oxidation,” Crit. Rev. Therap. Drug Carrier Systems, 10(4): 307-377 (1993).
  • P. Qi et al., “Characterization of the Photodegradation of a Human IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody Formulated as a High-concentration Liquid Dosage form,” J. Pharm. Sci., 98(9): 3117-3130 (2009).
  • Restriction Requirement mailed May 12, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Response to Restriction Requirement, filed Jun. 12, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Office Action, mailed Sep. 26, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Response to Office Action, filed Feb. 9, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Final Office Action, mailed May 5, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Amendment and Response under 37 C.F.R. §1.116, filed Aug. 4, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Advisory Action, mailed Aug. 7, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Request for Continued Examination, filed Sep. 3, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Office Action, mailed Nov. 16, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Reply to Office Action, filed Feb. 16, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Final Office Action, mailed May 19, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Interview Summary, mailed Aug. 19, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Request for Continued Examination and Reply to Office Action under 37 C.F.R. §1.114, filed Sep. 17, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Office Action, mailed Jun. 7, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Notice of Appeal under 37 C.F.R. §41.31, filed Sep. 7, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Appeal Brief under Board Rule §41.37, filed Oct. 3, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Examiner's Answer, mailed Dec. 21, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Reply Brief under Board Rule §41.41 and Request for Oral Hearing, filed Feb. 21, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/579,357.
  • Patent Owner's Response to Notice of Opposition submitted Mar. 7, 2014, for European Patent No. 1687028 B1 (Application No. 04818790.0-1412) (30 pages), including transmittal letter of Carpmaels & Ransford, submission list, observations, and main request claims (13 pages).
  • Document D17 submitted Mar. 7, 2014, with Patent Owner's Response to Notice of Opposition submitted Mar. 7, 2014, for European Patent No. 1687028 B1 (Application No. 04818790.0-1412): International Blood Plasma News Apr. 2010—Privigen (1 page).
  • Document D18 submitted Mar. 7, 2014, with Patent Owner's Response to Notice of Opposition submitted Mar. 7, 2014, for European Patent No. 1687028 B1 (Application No. 04818790.0-1412): CSL Behring press release of Feb. 24, 2011 (2 pages).
  • Document D19 submitted Mar. 7, 2014, with Patent Owner's Response to Notice of Opposition submitted Mar. 7, 2014, for European Patent No. 1687028 B1 (Application No. 04818790.0-1412): Letter from EMEA concerning Hizentra (3 pages).
  • Document D20 submitted Mar. 7, 2014, with Patent Owner's Response to Notice of Opposition submitted Mar. 7, 2014, for European Patent No. 1687028 B1 (Application No. 04818790.0-1412): Letter from US FDA concerning Hizentra (2 pages).
  • Document D21 submitted Mar. 7, 2014, with Patent Owner's Response to Notice of Opposition submitted Mar. 7, 2014, for European Patent No. 1687028 B1 (Application No. 04818790.0-1412): Transmittal of Labels and Circulars Mar. 28-29, 2010 from US FDA concerning Privigen (1 page).
  • Document D22 submitted with Patent Owner's Response to Notice of Opposition submitted Mar. 7, 2014, for European Patent No. 1687028 B1 (Application No. 04818790.0-1412) : Declaration of Annette Gaida (7 pages).
Patent History
Patent number: 8906368
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 14, 2012
Date of Patent: Dec 9, 2014
Patent Publication Number: 20130102760
Assignee: ZLB Behring AG (Bern)
Inventors: Reinhard Bolli (Worb), Gerhard Hodler (Worb), Regula Styger (Bern)
Primary Examiner: Yunsoo Kim
Application Number: 13/618,757
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Immunoglobulin, Antiserum, Antibody, Or Antibody Fragment, Except Conjugate Or Complex Of The Same With Nonimmunoglobulin Material (424/130.1)
International Classification: A61K 39/395 (20060101); A61K 47/18 (20060101); C07K 16/06 (20060101); A61K 9/00 (20060101);