Layer-3 support in TRILL networks

One embodiment of the present invention provides a switch. The switch includes an IP header processor and a forwarding mechanism. The IP header processor identifies a destination IP address in a packet encapsulated with an inner Ethernet header, a TRILL header, and an outer Ethernet header. The forwarding mechanism determines an output port and constructs a new header for the packet based on the destination IP address. The switch also includes a packet processor which determines whether (1) an inner destination media access control (MAC) address corresponds to a local MAC address assigned to the switch; (2) a destination RBridge identifier corresponds to a local RBridge identifier assigned to the switch; and (3) an outer destination MAC address corresponds to the local MAC address.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/481,643, titled “Layer-3 Support in Virtual Cluster Switching,” by inventors Phanidhar Koganti, Anoop Ghanwani, Suresh Vobbilisetty, Rajiv Krishnamurthy, Nagarajan Venkatesan, and Shunjia Yu, filed 2 May 2011, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/503,265, titled “IP Routing in VCS,” by inventors Phanidhar Koganti, Anoop Ghanwani, Suresh Vobbilisetty, Rajiv Krishnamurthy, Nagarajan Venkatesan, and Shunjia Yu, filed 30 Jun. 2011, which are incorporated by reference herein.

The present disclosure is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/087,239, titled “Virtual Cluster Switching,” by inventors Suresh Vobbilisetty and Dilip Chatwani, filed 14 Apr. 2011, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/725,249, titled “Redundant Host Connection in a Routed Network,” by inventors Somesh Gupta, Anoop Ghawani, Phanidhar Koganti, and Shunjia Yu, filed 16 Mar. 2010, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.

BACKGROUND

1. Field

The present disclosure relates to network design. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to a method and system for constructing a scalable switching system that supports layer-3 routing while facilitating automatic configuration.

2. Related Art

The growth of the Internet has brought with it an increasing demand for bandwidth. As a result, equipment vendors race to build larger and faster switches with versatile capabilities, such as layer-3 forwarding, to move more traffic efficiently. However, the size of a switch cannot grow infinitely. It is limited by physical space, power consumption, and design complexity, to name a few factors. Furthermore, switches with higher capability are usually more complex and expensive. More importantly, because an overly large and complex system often does not provide economy of scale, simply increasing the size and capability of a switch may prove economically unviable due to the increased per-port cost.

One way to increase the throughput of a switch system is to use switch stacking. In switch stacking, multiple smaller-scale, identical switches are interconnected in a special pattern to form a larger logical switch. The amount of required manual configuration and topological limitations for switch stacking becomes prohibitively tedious when the stack reaches a certain size, which precludes switch stacking from being a practical option in building a large-scale switching system.

Meanwhile, layer-2 (e.g., Ethernet) switching technologies continue to evolve. More routing-like functionalities, which have traditionally been the characteristics of layer-3 (e.g., Internet Protocol or IP) networks, are migrating into layer-2. Notably, the recent development of the Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) protocol allows Ethernet switches to function more like routing devices. TRILL overcomes the inherent inefficiency of the conventional spanning tree protocol, which forces layer-2 switches to be coupled in a logical spanning-tree topology to avoid looping. TRILL allows routing bridges (RBridges) to be coupled in an arbitrary topology without the risk of looping by implementing routing functions in switches and including a hop count in the TRILL header.

While TRILL brings many desirable features to layer-2 networks, some issues remain unsolved when layer-3 processing is desired.

SUMMARY

One embodiment of the present invention provides a switch. The switch includes an IP header processor and a forwarding mechanism. The IP header processor identifies a destination IP address in a packet encapsulated with an inner Ethernet header, a TRILL header, and an outer Ethernet header. The forwarding mechanism determines an output port and constructs a new header for the packet based on the destination IP address. The switch also includes a packet processor which determines whether (1) an inner destination media access control (MAC) address corresponds to a local MAC address assigned to the switch; (2) a destination RBridge identifier (RBridge ID) corresponds to a local RBridge identifier assigned to the switch; and (3) an outer destination MAC address corresponds to the local MAC address.

In a variation on this embodiment, the packet processor determines a first virtual local area network (VLAN) tag in the inner Ethernet header, wherein the new header includes a new inner Ethernet header which comprises a second VLAN tag.

In a variation on this embodiment, the switch includes a control mechanism which forms a virtual cluster switch in conjunction with one or more additional switches.

In a variation on this embodiment, the virtual cluster switch is an Ethernet fabric switch functioning as a logical Ethernet switch.

In a variation on this embodiment, the switch includes a switching mechanism switches the packet between VLANs based on the destination IP address.

In a variation on this embodiment, the RBridge identifier is a virtual RBridge identifier and the destination IP address is a virtual IP address assigned to a virtual IP router associated with the virtual RBridge identifier.

In a variation on this embodiment, the virtual IP router is formed by operating the switch in conjunction with at least another physical switch as a single logical router.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary TRILL network that includes a plurality of RBridges with IP processing capabilities, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary configuration of end devices belonging to different VLANs and coupled to a TRILL network, wherein one RBridge is IP capable, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2B illustrates an exemplary configuration of end devices belonging to different VLANs and coupled to a TRILL network, wherein all RBridges are IP capable, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary TRILL network with multiple VLANs, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary TRILL network with multiple VLANs, wherein each RBridge belongs to all VLANs, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge transmitting a frame, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an IP-capable RBridge transmitting a frame, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary network where a virtual RBridge and an associated virtual IP router are created based on a plurality of physical gateway RBridges with IP processing capabilities, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6A illustrates an exemplary configuration of how a virtual RBridge and an associated virtual IP router can be logically coupled to a number of gateway RBridges in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6B illustrates an exemplary configuration of how a virtual RBridge and an associated virtual IP router can be logically coupled to all RBridges in a TRILL network where each RBridge has IP processing capability, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a gateway RBridge associated with a virtual RBridge responding to an Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) query, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a gateway RBridge associated with a virtual RBridge forwarding a TRILL frame, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8 illustrates a scenario where one of the RBridges associated with the virtual RBridge experiences a link failure and/or a node failure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary architecture of a switch with IP processing capabilities, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the claims.

Overview

In embodiments of the present invention, the problem of providing scalable and flexible layer-3 (e.g., IP) support in a TRILL network is solved by facilitating IP routing in a number of RBridges in the TRILL network. The availability of IP processing within a TRILL network allows cross-layer-2-domain traffic (e.g., traffic across different VLANs) to be forwarded within a TRILL network, which reduces forwarding overhead. Usually, the IP router portion of one of these IP-capable RBridges is assigned as a default gateway router to an end device coupled to a TRILL network. Wherever the end device sends a frame to outside of its local network (e.g., a VLAN), the frame is forwarded to and processed by the IP router portion of the RBridge. This layer-3 processing occurs within the TRILL network. Note that, in a conventional TRILL network, such layer-3 processing has to be done by an IP router residing outside the TRILL network.

In some embodiments, the end-device may be coupled to the TRILL network via an ingress RBridge without IP processing capability. Under such a scenario, the TRILL RBridge portion of an IP-capable RBridge acts as an egress RBridge and the IP router portion of the RBridge can act as the default gateway router. A frame from the end device is received at the ingress RBridge and encapsulated in a TRILL packet, wherein the TRILL packet sets the egress RBridge identifier as the destination RBridge identifier, and the MAC address of the egress RBridge as the inner destination MAC address. The packet is then forwarded though the TRILL network and reaches the egress RBridge, where the outer destination MAC address of the packet is the MAC address of the egress RBridge. The IP router portion of the egress RBridge then processes the IP header in the frame and makes the layer-3 forwarding decision based on the destination IP address of the frame.

In some embodiments, the IP router portion of an IP-capable RBridge may be associated with multiple VLANs associated with the TRILL network. If the destination end device of the frame belongs to one of the associated VLANs, the IP router can obtain the MAC address of the destination end device using ARP requests within that VLAN. The corresponding RBridge of the IP router then sets the RBridge to which the destination end device is coupled as the egress RBridge and forwards the frame to the egress RBridge over the TRILL network.

Although the present disclosure is presented using examples based on the TRILL protocol, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to TRILL networks, or networks defined in a particular Open System Interconnection Reference Model (OSI reference model) layer.

The term “RBridge” refers to routing bridges, which are bridges implementing the TRILL protocol as described in IETF Request for Comments (RFC) “Routing Bridges (RBridges): Base Protocol Specification,” available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6325, which is incorporated by reference herein. Embodiments of the present invention are not limited to applications among RBridges. Other types of switches, routers, and forwarders can also be used.

In this disclosure, the term “edge port” refers to a port which sends/receives data frames in native Ethernet format. The term “TRILL port” refers to a port which sends/receives data frames encapsulated with a TRILL header and outer MAC header.

The term “end device” refers to a network device that is typically not TRILL-capable. “End device” is a relative term with respect to the TRILL network. However, “end device” does not necessarily mean that the network device is an end host. An end device can be a host, a conventional layer-2 switch, or any other type of network device. Additionally, an end device can be coupled to other switches or hosts further away from the TRILL network. In other words, an end device can be an aggregation point for a number of network devices to enter the TRILL network.

The term “IP-capable RBridge” refers to a physical RBridge that can process and route IP packets. An IP-capable RBridge can be coupled to a layer-3 network and can forward IP packets from end devices to the layer-3 network. A number of IP-capable RBridges can form a virtual RBridge and a corresponding virtual IP router, thereby facilitating a virtual gateway router for end devices that supports redundancy and load-balancing. In this disclosure, an RBridge which forms a virtual RBridge and a virtual IP router is also referred to as a “gateway” RBridge. A gateway RBridge responds to ARP requests for the virtual IP address with a virtual MAC address. In various embodiments, any arbitrary number of gateway RBridges can form the virtual RBridge. As gateway RBridges can process both TRILL and IP packets, in this disclosure the term “gateway RBridge” can refer to a physical RBridge in a TRILL network or a physical router in an IP network.

The term “IP router” refers to the IP-capable portion of an RBridge or a stand-alone IP router. In this disclosure, the terms “IP router” and “router” are used interchangeably.

The term “frame” refers to a group of bits that can be transported together across a network. “Frame” should not be interpreted as limiting embodiments of the present invention to layer-2 networks. “Frame” can be replaced by other terminologies referring to a group of bits, such as “packet,” “cell,” or “datagram.”

The term “RBridge identifier” refers to a group of bits that can be used to identify an RBridge. Note that the TRILL standard uses “RBridge ID” to denote a 48-bit intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system (IS-IS) System ID assigned to an RBridge, and “RBridge nickname” to denote a 16-bit value that serves as an abbreviation for the “RBridge ID.” In this disclosure, “RBridge identifier” is used as a generic term and is not limited to any bit format, and can refer to “RBridge ID” or “RBridge nickname” or any other format that can identify an RBridge.

Network Architecture

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary TRILL network that includes a plurality of RBridges with IP processing capabilities, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 1, a TRILL network 100 includes RBridges, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, and 107. RBridges 101, 102, and 103 are IP capable and coupled to a layer-3 network 150 as IP routers, 111, 112, and 113, respectively. For example, RBridge 101 and IP router 111 are the same physical device (represented by dotted lines), where its TRILL RBridge portion is denoted by RBridges 101 and its IP router portion is denoted by router 111. Similarly, RBridge 102 and IP router 112, and RBridge 103 and IP router 113, are the same physical devices, respectively.

RBridges in network 100 use edge ports to communicate to end devices and TRILL ports to communicate to other RBridges. For example, RBridge 104 is coupled to end device 122 via an edge port and to RBridges 105, 101, and 102 via TRILL ports. An end host coupled to an edge port may be a host machine or an aggregation node. For example, end devices 122, 124, 126, and 128 are host machines, wherein end devices 122 and 128 are directly coupled to network 100, and end devices 124 and 126 are coupled to network 100 via their aggregation node, a layer-2 bridge 130.

In FIG. 1, end device 128 is directly coupled to RBridge 103. Hence, IP router 113 can act as the default gateway for end device 128. Consequently, all frames from end device 128 destined to IP network 150 are received at IP router 113 and forwarded to network 150. On the other hand, RBridge 104 couples end device 122 to network 100 and acts as the ingress RBridge for all frames from end device 122. One of the IP-capable RBridges (e.g., RBridge 101) acts as the egress RBridge for frames from end device 122 to network 150. Under such a scenario, the frame destined to network 150 is encapsulated in a TRILL packet with the RBridge identifier of RBridge 101 as the destination RBridge identifier, and the MAC address of RBridge 101 as the inner destination MAC address. The TRILL packet is then forwarded to RBridge 101, where the outer destination MAC address of the packet is the MAC address of RBridge 101. IP router 111 then processes the IP header in the frame and makes the layer-3 forwarding decision based on the destination IP address of the frame.

During operation that does not involve layer-3 processing in RBridges, an end device coupled to the TRILL network may select the default gateway from a layer-3 network and use the corresponding IP address as a default gateway router address. For example, in FIG. 1, end device 128 selects the default gateway router from IP network 150. Any frame destined to network 150 from end device 128 is sent to the default gateway. Under such a scenario, if end devices 122 and 128 are on different VLANs, any communication between these end devices will go through network 150. If end device 128 sends a frame to end device 122, the frame first goes to the default gateway in network 150. Consequently, the default gateway processes the IP header in the frame and makes layer-3 forwarding decision toward end device 122. As a result, routing and bandwidth management will be inefficient and the frame will incur higher latency.

In embodiments of the present invention, as illustrated in FIG. 1, each frame destined to end device 122 from end device 128, wherein the end devices are on different VLANs, is received at RBridge 103. IP router 113 processes the IP header in the frame and makes the forwarding decision toward end device 122 (which involves forwarding the frame on end device 122's VLAN through TRILL network 100). Consequently, RBridge 103 forwards the frame to a corresponding egress RBridge 104 over TRILL network 100. RBridge 104, in turn, transmits the frame to end device 122. Hence, enabling layer-3 support on RBridges in a TRILL network provides higher efficiency in routing and bandwidth management.

In some embodiments, the TRILL network may be a virtual cluster switch (VCS). In a VCS, any number of RBridges in any arbitrary topology may logically operate as a single switch. Any new RBridge may join or leave the VCS in “plug-and-play” mode without any manual configuration.

Note that TRILL is only used as a transport between the switches within network 100. This is because TRILL can readily accommodate native Ethernet frames. Also, the TRILL standards provide a ready-to-use forwarding mechanism that can be used in any routed network with arbitrary topology. Embodiments of the present invention should not be limited to using only TRILL as the transport. Other protocols (such as multi-protocol label switching (MPLS)), either public or proprietary, can also be used for the transport.

Routine Across VLANs

FIG. 2A illustrates an exemplary configuration of how end devices belonging to different VLANs and coupled to a TRILL network, wherein one RBridge is IP capable, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, a TRILL network 200 includes TRILL RBridges 220 and 230. End device 202 is coupled to RBridge 220 over VLAN 212, and end device 204 is coupled to RBridge 220 over VLAN 214.

In the example in FIG. 2A, RBridge 230 is IP capable and IP router 235 is the IP router portion of RBridge 230 (denoted in dotted line). IP router 235 functions as a default gateway router for end devices 202 and 204. Consequently, although RBridge 220 couples both end devices 202 and 204 to network 200, any traffic between end devices 202 and 204 will be routed via IP router 235 because end devices 202 and 204 belong to different VLANs. For example, if end device 202 sends a frame to end device 204, it first assembles an IP packet with end device 204's IP address. Based on its local forwarding table, end device 202 realizes that it does not have a direct route to end device 204, and therefore needs to send the packet to gateway router 235. Hence, end device 202 encapsulates the IP packet in an Ethernet frame, whose destination MAC address is set to be gateway router 235's MAC address. Note that, if end device 202 has no knowledge of IP router 235's MAC address, end device 202 can send out an ARP request corresponding to the IP address of router 235. Router 235 then replies to the ARP request with its MAC address. Subsequently, end device 202 forwards the frame to RBridge 230 via ingress RBridge 220. IP router 235, in turn, receives the frame and removes its layer-2 header (including the VLAN tag corresponding to VLAN 212). IP router 235 then performs a lookup in its IP forwarding table based on the packet's destination IP address, and encapsulates the packet with a new Ethernet header which includes a VLAN tag corresponding VLAN 214. RBridge 230 then encapsulates the Ethernet frame with a TRILL header and forwards it to end device 204 via egress RBridge 220.

FIG. 2B illustrates an exemplary configuration of end devices belonging to different VLANs and coupled to a TRILL network, wherein all RBridges are IP capable, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, a TRILL network 200 includes TRILL RBridges 220 and 230. End device 202 is coupled to RBridge 220 over VLAN 212, and end device 204 is coupled to RBridge 220 over VLAN 214.

In the example in FIG. 2B, both RBridges 220 and 230 are IP capable and IP routers 225 and 235 are the IP router portion of RBridges 220 and 230, respectively. Under such a scenario, IP router 225 can be the default gateway router for end devices 202 and 204. Consequently, any traffic between end devices 202 and 204 can be routed via IP router 225. For example, if end device 202 sends a frame to end device 204, it assembles an IP packet with end device 204's IP address, encapsulates the IP packet in an Ethernet frame with destination MAC address as router 225's MAC address, and forwards the frame to RBridge 225 via ingress RBridge 220. Note that, if end device 202 has no knowledge of IP router 225's MAC address, end device 202 obtains the IP address of router 225 using ARP. IP router 225, in turn, receives the frame, performs a lookup in its IP forwarding table, encapsulates the packet with a new Ethernet header which includes a VLAN tag corresponding VLAN 214, and forwards it to end device 204 via egress RBridge 220. As the cross-layer-2-domain frame does not need to traverse through TRILL network 200, IP-processing capability at RBridge 220 thereby reduces the bandwidth usage in network 200.

Distributed Layer-3 Processing

In some embodiments, layer-3 processing capabilities can be distributed to multiple or all TRILL RBridges. In some embodiments, layer-3 processing capabilities associated different the VLANs can be distributed selectively across multiple RBridges. FIG. 3A illustrates an exemplary TRILL network with multiple VLANs, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example in FIG. 3A, network 300 includes RBridges 304, 305, 306, and 307. Each of these RBridges is IP capable. RBridge 304 is coupled to end devices 311 and 312; RBridge 305 is coupled to end devices 312, 313, and 314; RBridge 306 is coupled to end devices 315, 316, and 317; and RBridge 307 is coupled to end devices 317 and 318. RBridges 305 and 306 belong to VLAN 328; RBridges 304, 306, and 307, and end devices 312 and 318 belong to VLAN 326; RBridges 304, 305, and 306, and end device 311 belong to VLAN 324; and RBridges 305, 306, and 307, and end device 317 belong to VLAN 322.

In some embodiments, a layer-3 interface on an RBridge corresponding to a VLAN is a Switch Virtual Interface (SVI). For example, RBridge 304 in FIG. 3A has SVIs for VLANs 324 and 326 (although these SVIs can be on the same physical interface). Consequently, RBridge 304 and end device 318, and RBridge 304 and end device 311, are on the same VLAN segment. If end device 311 sends a frame to end device 318, the destination is outside of VLAN 324. Consequently, end device 318 sets the destination MAC address of the frame as the MAC address of the SVI on VLAN 324 at RBridge 304, which is the layer-3 gateway on VLAN 324. End device 318 then forwards the frame to RBridge 304. Upon receiving the frame, RBridge 304 recognizes that the frame's destination MAC address is a local MAC address. RBridge 304 then removes the frame's Ethernet header, performs a lookup in its IP forwarding table based on the frame's destination IP address, and encapsulates the frame with a new Ethernet header with a destination MAC address corresponding to end device 318 in VLAN 326. Finally, RBridge 304 forwards the frame to end device 318 via egress RBridge 307.

However, when end device 311 sends a frame to end device 317, RBridge 304 cannot forward the frame to end device 317 because RBridge 304 does not have an SVI on VLAN 322, to which end device 317 belongs. As a result, upon receiving a frame destined to end device 317 from end device 311, RBridge encapsulates the frame using a TRILL header with egress RBridge identifier corresponding to RBridge 306 because it has SVIs to all VLANs. RBridge 304 then forwards the frame to RBridge 306. The frame is routed though the TRILL network and reaches RBridge 306 when the outer destination MAC addresses match the MAC address of RBridge 306. Upon receiving the frame, RBridge 306 recognizes that the frame's outer destination MAC address is a local MAC address. RBridge 306 then removes the TRILL encapsulations, encapsulates the IP packet with a new Ethernet header with a destination MAC address corresponding to end device 317 in VLAN 322, and forwards the frame accordingly.

FIG. 3B illustrates an exemplary TRILL network with multiple VLANs, wherein each RBridge belongs to all VLANs, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, TRILL network 300 includes RBridges 304, 305, 306, and 307. Each of these RBridges is IP capable. End device 312 is coupled to RBridges 304 and 305, end device 317 is coupled to RBridges 306 and 307, and end device 318 is coupled to RBridge 307. All RBridges in network 300 have SVIs for VLANs 322 and 326. End devices 312 and 318 belong to VLAN 322, and end device 317 belongs to VLAN 326.

In this example, if end device 317 sends a frame to end device 318, the frame can be routed on layer-3 at RBridge 307 because RBridge 307 has SVIs for VLANs 322 and 326. As the frame does not travel to any other RBridge in network 300, it incurs lower latency while saving bandwidth in network 300. Similarly, if end device 317 sends a frame to end device 312, the frame can be routed on layer-3 at the IP router portion of either RBridge 306 or 307 as both have SVIs for VLANs 322 and 326. If all RBridges in the TRILL network have SVIs for all VLANs, inter-VLAN switching is possible at each RBridge.

Frame Processing

FIG. 4A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an RBridge transmitting a frame, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. During operation, an RBridge receives a frame (operation 402) and determines the type of port at which the frame was received (operation 404). If the frame is received at an edge port, then the RBridge checks whether the destination is coupled to a local edge port (operation 410). If the destination is not coupled to a local edge port, the RBridge encapsulates the frame in a TRILL packet and sets the RBridge identifier of the RBridge to which the end device is coupled as the egress RBridge identifier (operation 416). The RBridge then forwards the TRILL packet to the TRILL network (operation 418). Note that the MAC learning process allows an RBridge to learn about the port to which the end device is coupled.

If the frame is received on an edge port and the destination is coupled to a local edge port (operation 410), then the RBridge transmits the frame to the destination end device coupled to a local edge port (operation 414).

If the frame is received from a TRILL port (operation 404), the RBridge checks whether itself is the egress RBridge of the TRILL packet (operation 408). If not, then the RBridge forwards the TRILL packet to the TRILL network (operation 418). Otherwise, the RBridge transmits the frame to the destination end device coupled to a local edge port (operation 414).

FIG. 4B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of an IP-capable RBridge transmitting a frame, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The exemplary process in FIG. 4B is also applicable to embodiments with distributed layer-3 processing, as described in conjunction with FIG. 3A. During operation, an RBridge receives a frame (operation 452) and determines the type of port at which the frame is received (operation 454). If the frame is received at an edge port, then the RBridge inspects the frame to determine whether the end device with the destination MAC address is coupled to a local edge port (operation 456). If so, the frame is forwarded to the destination via the TRILL network (operation 464), as described in conjunction with FIG. 4A.

If the frame's destination MAC address is not coupled to a local edge port, then the RBridge determines whether the frame's destination MAC address is the RBridge's MAC address (operation 458). If the destination MAC address is not the RBridge's MAC address, then the RBridge encapsulates the frame in a TRILL packet and sets the RBridge identifier of a gateway RBridge as the egress RBridge identifier (operation 466). The RBridge then forwards the TRILL packet to the TRILL network (operation 476). On the other hand, if the frame's destination MAC address is the RBridge's MAC address (operation 458), then the RBridge performs layer-3 processing on the frame (operation 468) and determines the outgoing port (operation 470).

The RBridge then determines the type of the outgoing port (operation 462). If the outgoing port is an edge port, which means the destination end device is coupled locally, the RBridge forwards the frame, which is Ethernet encapsulated with the end device's MAC address as the destination MAC address, to the destination end device (operation 480). In some embodiments, the end device can be a layer-3 (e.g., IP) router. If the outgoing port is a TRILL port, then the end device is connected to a remote RBridge. Hence, the RBridge obtains the RBridge identifier of the RBridge to which the destination end device is coupled to based on the MAC address of the destination end device (operation 472). The RBridge then encapsulates the frame in a TRILL packet and sets the obtained RBridge identifier as the egress RBridge identifier (operation 474). The RBridge then forwards the TRILL packet to the TRILL network (operation 476).

If the frame is received from a TRILL port (operation 454), the RBridge checks whether itself is the egress RBridge of the TRILL packet (operation 460). If not, then the RBridge forwards the TRILL packet to the TRILL network (operation 476). Otherwise, the RBridge forwards the frame to the destination end device coupled to a local edge port (operation 480). In some embodiments, the end device can be a layer-3 router, in which case the forwarding includes layer-3 processing on the frame.

Virtual Switch Formation

In some embodiments, a number of TRILL RBridges with IP processing capabilities may act as layer-3 routers for an end device. These RBridges can form a virtual RBridge, which is assigned with a virtual RBridge identifier. Furthermore, these RBridges form a virtual IP router, which is assigned with a virtual IP address and a corresponding virtual MAC address. This virtual IP router operates as a default gateway router, which can provide redundancy and load balancing.

FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary network where a virtual RBridge and an associated virtual IP router are created based on a plurality of physical gateway RBridges with IP processing capabilities, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 5, a TRILL network 500 includes RBridges 504, 505, 506, 507, 511, 512, and 513. RBridges 511, 512, and 513 operate as gateway RBridges and are coupled to a layer-3 network 150 as IP routers 521, 522, and 523, respectively. For example, gateway RBridge 511 and IP router 521 are same physical device (represented by dotted lines), where its TRILL RBridge portion is denoted by gateway RBridge 511 and its IP router portion is denoted by IP router 521. Similarly, gateway RBridge 512 and IP router 522, and gateway RBridge 513 and IP router 523 are the same physical devices, respectively.

Gateway RBridges 511, 512, and 513 form a virtual RBridge 530 by operating as a single logical RBridge in TRILL network 500. Similarly, the corresponding IP routers 521, 522, and 523 form a virtual IP router 540 by operating as a single logical IP router. An end device 562 coupled to network 500 through RBridge 507 can use virtual IP router 540 as the default gateway router to layer-3 network 550.

In embodiments of the present invention, as illustrated in FIG. 1, Virtual RBridge 530 is considered to be logically coupled to gateway RBridges 511, 512, and 513, optionally with zero-cost links represented by dashed lines. Furthermore, gateway RBridges 511, 512, and 513 can advertise their respective connectivity (optionally via zero-cost links) to virtual RBridge 530. As a result, other RBridges in the TRILL network can learn that virtual RBridge 530 is reachable via gateway RBridges 511, 512, and 513, and establish TRILL paths to virtual RBridge 530 using a corresponding virtual RBridge identifier through these gateway RBridges.

All the IP-layer router portions of these gateway RBridges are configured to operate as the layer-3 gateway router (i.e., virtual IP router 540) for end device 562. End device 562 uses virtual IP router 540 as the default gateway. Because virtual RBridge 530 is associated with virtual IP router 540, incoming frames from end device 562 destined to network 550 are marked with virtual RBridge 530's identifier as the egress RBridge identifier. Consequently, all frames from end device 562 to network 550 are delivered to one of the gateway RBridges 511, 512, and 513. Hence, load balancing can be achieved among gateway RBridges 511, 512, and 513 for frames sent to virtual RBridge 530.

FIG. 6A illustrates an exemplary configuration of how a virtual RBridge and an associated virtual IP router can be logically coupled to a number of gateway RBridges in a TRILL network, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, a TRILL network 600 includes a number of TRILL RBridges 602, 604, and 606. Network 600 also includes RBridges 616 and 618, each with a number of edge ports which can be coupled to external networks. For example, RBridges 616 and 618 are coupled with end devices 652 and 654 via 10GE edge ports. RBridges in network 600 are in communication with each other using TRILL protocol.

Also included in network 600 are RBridges 622 and 624, which are layer-3 capable and coupled to an IP network 680. Gateway RBridges 622 and 624 form virtual RBridge 640 with a virtual RBridge identifier 645. Physically co-located IP Routers 632 and 634 within gateway RBridges 622 and 624, respectively, form a virtual IP router 670 which is assigned a virtual IP address 660 and a virtual MAC address 650. Virtual IP address 660 maps to virtual MAC address 650 for ARP requests directed to virtual IP router 670. Furthermore, virtual RBridge identifier 645 is associated with virtual MAC address 650. End devices 652 and 654 can set virtual IP address 660 as their default gateway router address and use ARP to obtain virtual MAC address 650. End devices 652 and 654 send frames with virtual MAC address 650 as the destination address into network 600. The frames are encapsulated in TRILL packets and routed toward virtual RBridge 640 using the corresponding virtual RBridge identifier 645.

In some embodiments, a virtual IP address can be assigned for each VLAN associated with a TRILL network. For example, in FIG. 6A, end device 652 may belong to VLAN 692, and end device 654 may belong to VLAN 694. Different virtual IP addresses may be used for VLANs 692 and 694, respectively. End devices 652 and 654 then use the virtual IP address associated with VLAN 692 and VLAN 694 as their respective default gateway router addresses. Consequently, end devices 652 and 654 perceive virtual IP router 670 to be in VLAN 692 and VLAN 694, respectively. For ARP requests for either virtual IP address, the same virtual MAC address 650 is sent in reply. All data frames injected to TRILL network 600 with virtual MAC address 650 as the destination MAC address are routed toward virtual RBridge 640.

Note that in one embodiment, the virtual MAC address is known to all RBridges in the network 600. Otherwise, both IP routers 632 and 634 receive a frame forwarded to virtual MAC address 650 and results in packet duplication. Hence, after formation of virtual RBridge 640 and virtual IP router 670, all RBridges in network 600 are provided with the knowledge about virtual MAC address 650. That is, virtual MAC address 650 is always “known” to all ingress RBridges in network 600, and frames destined to virtual MAC address 650 are routed through network 600 using TRILL unicast.

In some embodiments, only one gateway RBridge is elected to reply to ARP requests for the virtual IP address. This election can also be VLAN specific.

FIG. 6B illustrates an exemplary configuration of how a virtual RBridge and an associated virtual IP router can be logically coupled to all RBridges in a TRILL network where each RBridge has IP processing capability, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, all RBridges in TRILL network 600 have IP processing capabilities. Even though only RBridges 622 and 624 are connected to an IP network, IP processing capacity at all RBridges enables them to route across VLANs, as described in conjunction with FIG. 3B. For example, any traffic between VLANs 692 and 694 can be switched at RBridges 616 and 618 without requiring the traffic to travel to another RBridge in network 600.

In some embodiments, all RBridges in network 600 are associated with virtual RBridge 640 and a virtual IP router 670, and share a virtual RBridge identifier 645, a virtual IP address 660, and a virtual MAC address 650. In some embodiments, all RBridges in network 600 may be connected to IP network 680.

ARP and Frame Processing in a Virtual Switch

FIG. 7A presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a gateway RBridge associated with a virtual RBridge responding to an Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) query, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Upon receiving an ARP request packet for an IP address (operation 702), the gateway RBridge checks whether the ARP request is for a virtual IP address (operation 704). If not, the gateway RBridge responds based on the IP address in the ARP request (assuming that IP address is the gateway RBridge's physical IP address) (operation 720). Otherwise, the gateway RBridge checks whether it is elected to respond to an ARP request for the virtual IP address (operation 706). If not, the ARP request is discarded. Otherwise the gateway RBridge retrieves the virtual MAC address for the virtual IP address (operation 708) and generates an ARP reply containing the virtual MAC address (operation 710). The gateway RBridge transmits the ARP reply to the TRILL network (operation 712). Note that an ARP request is disseminated in the TRILL network using multicast and each IP-capable RBridge, including the one elected to respond to ARP requests for the virtual IP address, receives the query. However, the ARP reply is sent as a unicast transmission in the TRILL network to the end device.

FIG. 7B presents a flowchart illustrating the process of a gateway RBridge associated with a virtual RBridge forwarding a TRILL frame, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Upon receiving a TRILL frame (operation 752), the RBridge checks whether the egress RBridge identifier in the TRILL header of the frame corresponds to a virtual RBridge (operation 754). If the identifier does not correspond to the virtual RBridge, the RBridge inspects whether the egress RBridge identifier in the TRILL header of the frame corresponds to the local RBridge. If not, then the TRILL frame is forwarded to the next-hop RBridge based on the egress RBridge identifier (operation 762). Otherwise, the RBridge removes the TRILL encapsulation and send the frame to a local egress port (operation 764). If the RBridge identifier corresponds to the virtual RBridge, the RBridge checks whether the destination MAC address of the Ethernet frame encapsulated in the TRILL frame is the associated virtual MAC address (operation 756). If so, then the frame is destined to an IP network the gateway RBridge is coupled to. Hence, the IP packet is extracted from the Ethernet payload of the frame (operation 772). The gateway RBridge checks the IP address of the IP packet and performs layer-3 IP forwarding toward the IP network (operation 774). On the other hand, if the destination MAC address is not the virtual MAC address, then the virtual RBridge is for multi-homed layer-2 end devices. Accordingly, the RBridge removes the TRILL encapsulation and send the frame to locally connected egress port (operation 764). Operation of virtual RBridges for multi-homed end devices, such as forwarding multicast frames, is specified in the U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0246388, titled “Redundant Host Connection in a Routed Network,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

Failure Handling

FIG. 8 illustrates a scenario where one of the RBridges associated with the virtual RBridge experiences a link failure and/or a node failure, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, in a TRILL network 800, RBridges 811, 812, and 813 form a virtual RBridge 840, and their respective IP-router portions denoted as IP routers 821, 822, and 823 form a virtual IP router 850. Also included are four RBridges 804, 805, 806, and 807. An end device 870 is connected to network 800 using RBridge 804 as the ingress RBridge. Virtual IP router 850 is set as a default gateway router for end device 870. Hence, all frames destined to network 880 from end device 870 have the virtual MAC address assigned to virtual IP router 850 as the destination MAC address. Note that these frames can be forwarded by gateway RBridges 811, 812, and 813 for load balancing. Gateway RBridges 811, 812, and 813 also provide redundancy among each other to handle failures.

Suppose that a failure 864 occurs to link 831 adjacent to gateway RBridge 811. As a result, link 831 is removed from routing decisions in network 800. All frames from end device 870 are still using the virtual MAC address as the destination address, and thus are still forwarded to any of the gateway RBridges via alternative links (e.g., links 832, 833, and 834).

Suppose that a failure 862 occurs during operation that fails link 836 adjacent to IP router 821. Consequently, IP router 821 is disconnected from network 880 and is incapable of forwarding frames to network 880. Under such a scenario, IP router 821 is removed from virtual IP router 850. As a result, IP router 821 stops operating as a layer-3 gateway router for end device 870. However, gateway RBridge 811 still remains connected to network 800 and continues to operate as a regular TRILL RBridge. As virtual IP router 850 still operates as a default gateway for end device 870, IP routers 822 and 823 can continue to operate as layer-3 gateway routers (as virtual IP router 850) for end device 870. Hence, all frames from end device 870 to network 880 are then distributed among gateway RBridges 812 and 813.

In some embodiments, with failure 862, an elected gateway RBridge stops responding to ARP requests for the virtual IP address and notifies other gateway RBridges. Consequently, the other gateway RBridges then elect among themselves another gateway RBridge to respond to ARP requests.

In some embodiments, with failure 862, IP router 821 might not immediately remove its membership from virtual IP router 850 and might continue to receive layer-3 traffic from end devices. Under such circumstances, gateway RBridge 811, the TRILL counterpart of IP router 821, forwards the layer-3 traffic with TRILL encapsulation to other gateway RBridges (e.g., gateway RBridge 812) which, in turn, forward the traffic to network 880. However, if all similar IP routers suffer link failures and lose their connection to network 880, IP router 821 along with the other gateway RBridges with link failures are removed from virtual IP router 850. However, all gateway RBridges continue operating as TRILL RBridges.

Suppose that a node failure 866 occurs at gateway RBridge 811 (and essentially IP router 821 as they are the same physical device). As a result, links 831, 833, 835, and 836 fail as well. Consequently, gateway RBridge 811 and IP router 821 are disconnected from both network 800 and network 880, and are incapable of transmitting to or receiving from either network. Under such a scenario, IP router 821 is removed from virtual IP router 850 and gateway RBridge 811 is removed from virtual RBridge 840. As a result, IP router 821 stops operating as a layer-3 gateway node. Furthermore, gateway RBridge 811 is disconnected from network 800 and removed from all TRILL routes in network 800.

With failure 866, as virtual IP router 850 still operates as a default gateway for end device 870, routers 822 and 823 continue operating as layer-3 gateway nodes for end device 870. Hence, all frames from end device 870 to network 880 are distributed between gateway RBridges 812 and 813. Furthermore, if IP router 821 had been an elected router, it stops responding to ARP requests for the virtual IP address. Other RBridges coupled to the failed gateway RBridge can detect the failure and notify all RBridges, including other active gateway RBridges. Consequently, the active gateway RBridges can elect another gateway RBridge to respond to ARP requests.

Exemplary Switch System

FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary architecture of a switch with IP processing capabilities, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, an RBridge 900 includes a number of TRILL ports 904, a TRILL management and forwarding module 920, an IP management module 930, an Ethernet frame processor 910, and a storage 950. TRILL management and forwarding module 920 further includes a TRILL header processing module 922. IP management module 930 further includes an ARP module 934 and an IP header processing module 936.

TRILL ports 904 include inter-switch communication channels for communication with one or more RBridges. This inter-switch communication channel can be implemented via a regular communication port and based on any open or proprietary format. Furthermore, the inter-switch communication between RBridges is not required to be direct port-to-port communication.

During operation, TRILL ports 904 receive TRILL frames from (and transmit frames to) other RBridges. TRILL header processing module 922 processes TRILL header information of the received frames and performs routing on the received frames based on their TRILL headers, as described in conjunction with FIG. 4B. TRILL management and forwarding module 920 forwards frames in the TRILL network toward other RBridges and frames destined to a layer-3 node toward the IP management module 930. IP header processing module 936 forwards frames across VLANs.

In some embodiments, RBridge 900 may form a virtual RBridge and a virtual IP address, wherein TRILL management and forwarding module 920 further includes a virtual RBridge configuration module 924, and IP management module 930 further includes a virtual IP router configuration module 938. TRILL header processing module 922 generates the TRILL header and outer Ethernet header for ingress frames corresponding to the virtual RBridge. Virtual RBridge configuration module 924 manages the communication with gateway RBridges and handles various inter-switch communications, such as link and node failure notifications. Virtual RBridge configuration module 924 allows a user to configure and assign the identifier for the virtual RBridges, and decides whether a frame has to be promoted to layer-3, as described in conjunction with FIG. 7B.

Furthermore, virtual IP router configuration module 938 handles various inter-switch communications, such as layer-3 link failure notifications. Virtual IP router configuration module 938 allows a user to configure and assign virtual IP addresses and a virtual MAC address.

ARP module 934 is responsible for ARP request replies, as described in conjunction with FIG. 4B. ARP module 934 also maintains mappings between a virtual MAC address and a virtual IP address and stores the mappings in Storage 950. Storage 950 also includes TRILL and IP routing information.

In some embodiments, gateway RBridge 900 may include a number of edge ports 902, as described in conjunction with FIG. 1. Edge ports 902 receive frames from (and transmit frames to) end devices. Ethernet frame processor 910 extracts and processes header information from the received frames. Ethernet frame processor 910 forwards the frames to IP management module 930 if there is no other intermediate RBridge between the end device and RBridge 900.

In some embodiments, gateway RBridge 900 may include a VCS configuration module 944 that includes a virtual switch management module 940 and a logical switch 942 as described in conjunction with FIG. 1. VCS configuration module 944 maintains a configuration database in storage 950 that maintains the configuration state of every switch within the VCS. Virtual switch management module 940 maintains the state of logical switch 942, which is used to join other VCS switches. In some embodiments, logical switch 942 can be configured to operate in conjunction with Ethernet frame processor 910 as a logical Ethernet switch.

Note that the above-mentioned modules can be implemented in hardware as well as in software. In one embodiment, these modules can be embodied in computer-executable instructions stored in a memory which is coupled to one or more processors in gateway RBridge 900. When executed, these instructions cause the processor(s) to perform the aforementioned functions.

In summary, embodiments of the present invention provide a switch, a method and a system for providing layer-3 support in a TRILL network. In one embodiment, the switch includes an IP header processor and a forwarding mechanism. The IP header processor identifies a destination IP address in a packet encapsulated with an inner Ethernet header, a TRILL header, and an outer Ethernet header. The forwarding mechanism determines an output port and constructs a new header for the packet based on the destination IP address. The switch also includes a packet processor which determines whether (1) an inner destination media access control (MAC) address corresponds to a local MAC address assigned to the switch; (2) a destination RBridge identifier corresponds to a local RBridge identifier assigned to the switch; and (3) an outer destination MAC address corresponds to the local MAC address. Such configuration provides a scalable and flexible solution to enable layer-3 processing in the switch.

The methods and processes described herein can be embodied as code and/or data, which can be stored in a computer-readable non-transitory storage medium. When a computer system reads and executes the code and/or data stored on the computer-readable non-transitory storage medium, the computer system performs the methods and processes embodied as data structures and code and stored within the medium.

The methods and processes described herein can be executed by and/or included in hardware modules or apparatus. These modules or apparatus may include, but are not limited to, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) chip, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a dedicated or shared processor that executes a particular software module or a piece of code at a particular time, and/or other programmable-logic devices now known or later developed. When the hardware modules or apparatus are activated, they perform the methods and processes included within them.

The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit this disclosure. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A switch, comprising:

layer-2 processing circuitry configured to determine that: outer and inner destination media access control (MAC) addresses of a packet correspond to a MAC address assigned to the switch, wherein the packet is encapsulated with an inner Ethernet header, a routable header, and an outer Ethernet header;
encapsulation circuitry configured to determine that: a destination switch identifier of the routable header corresponds to a switch identifier assigned to the switch, wherein the routable header is placed between the outer and inner Ethernet headers;
Internet Protocol (IP) processing circuitry configured to lookup a destination IP address of a layer-3 header of the packet in a local layer-3 forwarding table in the switch, wherein the layer-3 header is distinct from the routable header, and wherein the destination IP address is a virtual IP address assigned to a virtual IP router, which is formed based on the switch in conjunction with at least another physical switch to operate as a single router; and
forwarding circuitry configured to determine an output port and construct a new header for the packet based on looking up the destination IP address in the local layer-3 forwarding table.

2. The switch of claim 1, wherein the layer-2 processing circuitry is further configured to determine a first virtual local area network (VLAN) tag in the inner Ethernet header; and

wherein the new header includes a new inner Ethernet header comprising a second VLAN tag.

3. The switch of claim 1, wherein the switch is a member of a network of interconnected switches, wherein the network of interconnected switches is controlled as a single logical switch.

4. The switch of claim 1, further comprising switching circuitry configured to switch the packet between VLANs based on the destination IP address.

5. The switch of claim 1, wherein the destination switch identifier is a virtual switch identifier; and

wherein the virtual IP router is associated with the virtual switch identifier.

6. The switch of claim 1, wherein the IP processing circuitry is further configured to map the virtual IP address to a virtual media access control (MAC) address.

7. The switch of claim 1, further comprising Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) circuitry configured to generate an ARP response for an IP address assigned to the switch, wherein the ARP response comprises a MAC address assigned to the switch.

8. A method, comprising:

determining that: outer and inner destination media access control (MAC) addresses of a packet correspond to a MAC address assigned to a switch, wherein the packet is encapsulated with an inner Ethernet header, a routable header, and an outer Ethernet header; and a destination switch identifier of the routable header corresponds to a switch identifier assigned to the switch, wherein the routable header is placed between the outer and inner Ethernet headers;
looking up a destination Internet Protocol (IP) address of a layer-3 header of the packet in a local layer-3 forwarding table in the switch, wherein the layer-3 header is distinct from the routable header, and wherein the destination IP address is a virtual IP address assigned to a virtual IP router, which is formed based on the switch in conjunction with at least another physical switch to operate as a single router; and
determining an output port and constructing a new header for the packet based on looking up the destination IP address in the local layer-3 forwarding table.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:

determining a first virtual local area network (VLAN) tag in the inner Ethernet header; and
including in the new header a new inner Ethernet header comprising a second VLAN tag.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the switch is a member of a network of interconnected switches wherein the network of interconnected switches is controlled as a single logical switch.

11. The method of claim 8, further comprising switching the packet between VLANs based on the destination IP address.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein the destination switch identifier is a virtual switch identifier; and

wherein the virtual IP router is associated with the virtual switch identifier.

13. The method of claim 8, further comprising mapping the virtual IP address to a virtual media access control (MAC) address.

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising generating an Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) response for an IP address assigned to the switch, wherein the ARP response comprises a MAC address assigned to the switch.

15. A computing system, comprising:

a processor; and
a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions which when executed by the processor causes the processor to perform a method, the method comprising: determining that: outer and inner destination media access control (MAC) addresses of a packet correspond to a MAC address assigned to the computing system, wherein the packet is encapsulated with an inner Ethernet header, a routable header, and an outer Ethernet header; and a destination switch identifier of the routable header corresponds to a switch identifier is assigned to the computing system; looking up a destination Internet Protocol (IP) address of a layer-3 header of the packet in a local layer-3 forwarding table in the computing system, wherein the layer-3 header is distinct from the routable header and wherein the destination IP address is a virtual IP address assigned to a virtual IP router, which is formed based on the switch in conjunction with at least another physical switch to operate as a single router; and determining an output port and constructing a new header for the packet based on looking up the destination IP address in the local-layer-3 forwarding table.

16. The computing system of claim 15, within the method further comprises:

determining a first virtual local area network (VLAN) tag in the inner Ethernet header; and
including in the new header a new inner Ethernet header comprising a second VLAN tag.

17. The computing system of claim 15, wherein the computing system is a member of a network of interconnected switches, wherein the network of interconnected switches is controlled as a single logical switch.

18. The computing system of claim 15,

wherein the destination switch identifier is a virtual switch identifier; and
wherein the virtual IP router is associated with the virtual switch identifier.

19. The computing system of claim 15, wherein the method further comprises generating an Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) response for an IP address assigned to the computing system, wherein the ARP response comprises a MAC address assigned to the computing system.

20. The computing system of claim 15, whether the method further comprises switching the packet between VLANs based on the destination IP address.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
5390173 February 14, 1995 Spinney
5802278 September 1, 1998 Isfeld
5878232 March 2, 1999 Marimuthu
5959968 September 28, 1999 Chin
5973278 October 26, 1999 Wehrill, III
5983278 November 9, 1999 Chong
6041042 March 21, 2000 Bussiere
6064671 May 16, 2000 Killian
6085238 July 4, 2000 Yuasa
6104696 August 15, 2000 Kadambi
6185214 February 6, 2001 Schwartz
6185241 February 6, 2001 Sun
6438106 August 20, 2002 Pillar
6498781 December 24, 2002 Bass
6542266 April 1, 2003 Phillips
6633761 October 14, 2003 Singhal
6771610 August 3, 2004 Seaman
6873602 March 29, 2005 Ambe
6937576 August 30, 2005 DiBenedetto
6956824 October 18, 2005 Mark
6957269 October 18, 2005 Williams
6975581 December 13, 2005 Medina
6975864 December 13, 2005 Singhal
7016352 March 21, 2006 Chow
7061877 June 13, 2006 Gummalla
7173934 February 6, 2007 Lapuh
7197308 March 27, 2007 Singhal
7206288 April 17, 2007 Cometto
7310664 December 18, 2007 Merchant
7313637 December 25, 2007 Tanaka
7315545 January 1, 2008 Chowdhury et al.
7316031 January 1, 2008 Griffith
7330897 February 12, 2008 Baldwin
7380025 May 27, 2008 Riggins
7397794 July 8, 2008 Lacroute
7430164 September 30, 2008 Bare
7453888 November 18, 2008 Zabihi
7477894 January 13, 2009 Sinha
7480258 January 20, 2009 Shuen
7508757 March 24, 2009 Ge
7558195 July 7, 2009 Kuo
7558273 July 7, 2009 Grosser, Jr.
7571447 August 4, 2009 Ally
7599901 October 6, 2009 Mital
7688736 March 30, 2010 Walsh
7688960 March 30, 2010 Aubuchon
7690040 March 30, 2010 Frattura
7706255 April 27, 2010 Kondrat et al.
7716370 May 11, 2010 Devarapalli
7720076 May 18, 2010 Dobbins
7729296 June 1, 2010 Choudhary
7787480 August 31, 2010 Mehta
7792920 September 7, 2010 Istvan
7796593 September 14, 2010 Ghosh
7808992 October 5, 2010 Homchaudhuri
7836332 November 16, 2010 Hara
7843906 November 30, 2010 Chidambaram et al.
7843907 November 30, 2010 Abou-Emara
7860097 December 28, 2010 Lovett
7898959 March 1, 2011 Arad
7924837 April 12, 2011 Shabtay
7937756 May 3, 2011 Kay
7945941 May 17, 2011 Sinha
7949638 May 24, 2011 Goodson
7957386 June 7, 2011 Aggarwal
8018938 September 13, 2011 Fromm
8027354 September 27, 2011 Portolani
8054832 November 8, 2011 Shukia
8068442 November 29, 2011 Kompella
8078704 December 13, 2011 Lee
8102781 January 24, 2012 Smith
8102791 January 24, 2012 Tang
8116307 February 14, 2012 Thesayi
8125928 February 28, 2012 Mehta
8134922 March 13, 2012 Elangovan
8155150 April 10, 2012 Chung
8160063 April 17, 2012 Maltz
8160080 April 17, 2012 Arad
8170038 May 1, 2012 Belanger
8194674 June 5, 2012 Pagel
8195774 June 5, 2012 Lambeth
8204061 June 19, 2012 Sane
8213313 July 3, 2012 Doiron
8213336 July 3, 2012 Smith
8230069 July 24, 2012 Korupolu
8239960 August 7, 2012 Frattura
8249069 August 21, 2012 Raman
8270401 September 18, 2012 Barnes
8295291 October 23, 2012 Ramanathan
8295921 October 23, 2012 Wang
8301686 October 30, 2012 Appajodu
8339994 December 25, 2012 Gnanasekaran
8351352 January 8, 2013 Eastlake, III
8369335 February 5, 2013 Jha
8369347 February 5, 2013 Xiong
8392496 March 5, 2013 Linden
8462774 June 11, 2013 Page
8465774 June 18, 2013 Page
8467375 June 18, 2013 Blair
8520595 August 27, 2013 Yadav
8599850 December 3, 2013 Jha
8599864 December 3, 2013 Chung
8615008 December 24, 2013 Natarajan
8706905 April 22, 2014 McGlaughlin
8724456 May 13, 2014 Hong
8806031 August 12, 2014 Kondur
8826385 September 2, 2014 Congdon
8937865 January 20, 2015 Kumar
20010005527 June 28, 2001 Vaeth
20010055274 December 27, 2001 Hegge
20020019904 February 14, 2002 Katz
20020021701 February 21, 2002 Lavian
20020039350 April 4, 2002 Wang
20020054593 May 9, 2002 Morohashi
20020091795 July 11, 2002 Yip
20030041085 February 27, 2003 Sato
20030123393 July 3, 2003 Feuerstraeter
20030174706 September 18, 2003 Shankar
20030189905 October 9, 2003 Lee
20030216143 November 20, 2003 Roese
20040001433 January 1, 2004 Gram
20040003094 January 1, 2004 See
20040010600 January 15, 2004 Baldwin
20040049699 March 11, 2004 Griffith
20040057430 March 25, 2004 Paavolainen
20040117508 June 17, 2004 Shimizu
20040120326 June 24, 2004 Yoon
20040156313 August 12, 2004 Hofmeister et al.
20040165595 August 26, 2004 Holmgren
20040165596 August 26, 2004 Garcia
20040213232 October 28, 2004 Regan
20050007951 January 13, 2005 Lapuh
20050044199 February 24, 2005 Shiga
20050074001 April 7, 2005 Mattes
20050094568 May 5, 2005 Judd
20050094630 May 5, 2005 Valdevit
20050122979 June 9, 2005 Gross
20050157645 July 21, 2005 Rabie et al.
20050157751 July 21, 2005 Rabie
20050169188 August 4, 2005 Cometto
20050195813 September 8, 2005 Ambe
20050207423 September 22, 2005 Herbst
20050213561 September 29, 2005 Yao
20050220096 October 6, 2005 Friskney
20050265356 December 1, 2005 Kawarai
20050278565 December 15, 2005 Frattura
20060007869 January 12, 2006 Hirota
20060018302 January 26, 2006 Ivaldi
20060023707 February 2, 2006 Makishima et al.
20060034292 February 16, 2006 Wakayama
20060059163 March 16, 2006 Frattura
20060062187 March 23, 2006 Rune
20060072550 April 6, 2006 Davis
20060083254 April 20, 2006 Ge
20060098589 May 11, 2006 Kreeger
20060140130 June 29, 2006 Kalkunte
20060168109 July 27, 2006 Warmenhoven
20060184937 August 17, 2006 Abels
20060221960 October 5, 2006 Borgione
20060235995 October 19, 2006 Bhatia
20060242311 October 26, 2006 Mai
20060245439 November 2, 2006 Sajassi
20060251067 November 9, 2006 Desanti
20060256767 November 16, 2006 Suzuki
20060265515 November 23, 2006 Shiga
20060285499 December 21, 2006 Tzeng
20060291388 December 28, 2006 Amdahl
20070036178 February 15, 2007 Hares
20070083625 April 12, 2007 Chamdani
20070086362 April 19, 2007 Kato
20070094464 April 26, 2007 Sharma
20070097968 May 3, 2007 Du
20070098006 May 3, 2007 Parry
20070116224 May 24, 2007 Burke
20070116422 May 24, 2007 Burke
20070156659 July 5, 2007 Lim
20070177525 August 2, 2007 Wijnands
20070177597 August 2, 2007 Ju
20070183313 August 9, 2007 Narayanan
20070211712 September 13, 2007 Fitch
20070258449 November 8, 2007 Bennett
20070274234 November 29, 2007 Kubota
20070289017 December 13, 2007 Copeland, III
20080052487 February 28, 2008 Akahane
20080065760 March 13, 2008 Damm
20080080517 April 3, 2008 Roy
20080095160 April 24, 2008 Yadav
20080101386 May 1, 2008 Gray
20080112400 May 15, 2008 Dunbar et al.
20080133760 June 5, 2008 Berkvens et al.
20080159277 July 3, 2008 Vobbilisetty
20080172492 July 17, 2008 Raghunath
20080181196 July 31, 2008 Regan
20080181243 July 31, 2008 Vobbilisetty
20080186981 August 7, 2008 Seto
20080205377 August 28, 2008 Chao
20080219172 September 11, 2008 Mohan
20080225852 September 18, 2008 Raszuk
20080225853 September 18, 2008 Melman
20080228897 September 18, 2008 Ko
20080240129 October 2, 2008 Elmeleegy
20080267179 October 30, 2008 Lavinge
20080285458 November 20, 2008 Lysne
20080285555 November 20, 2008 Ogasahara
20080298248 December 4, 2008 Roeck
20080304498 December 11, 2008 Jorgensen
20080310342 December 18, 2008 Kruys
20090022069 January 22, 2009 Khan
20090037607 February 5, 2009 Farinacci
20090042270 February 12, 2009 Dolly
20090044270 February 12, 2009 Shelly
20090067422 March 12, 2009 Poppe
20090067442 March 12, 2009 Killian
20090079560 March 26, 2009 Fries
20090080345 March 26, 2009 Gray
20090083445 March 26, 2009 Ganga
20090092042 April 9, 2009 Yuhura
20090092043 April 9, 2009 Lapuh
20090106405 April 23, 2009 Mazarick
20090116381 May 7, 2009 Kanda
20090129384 May 21, 2009 Regan
20090138577 May 28, 2009 Casado
20090138752 May 28, 2009 Graham
20090161584 June 25, 2009 Guan
20090161670 June 25, 2009 Shepherd
20090168647 July 2, 2009 Holness
20090199177 August 6, 2009 Edwards
20090204965 August 13, 2009 Tanaka
20090213783 August 27, 2009 Moreton
20090222879 September 3, 2009 Kostal
20090232031 September 17, 2009 Vasseur
20090245137 October 1, 2009 Hares
20090245242 October 1, 2009 Carlson
20090246137 October 1, 2009 Hadida
20090252049 October 8, 2009 Ludwig
20090252061 October 8, 2009 Small
20090260083 October 15, 2009 Szeto
20090279558 November 12, 2009 Davis
20090292858 November 26, 2009 Lambeth
20090316721 December 24, 2009 Kanda
20090323708 December 31, 2009 Ihle
20090327392 December 31, 2009 Tripathi
20090327462 December 31, 2009 Adams
20100027420 February 4, 2010 Smith
20100046471 February 25, 2010 Hattori
20100054260 March 4, 2010 Pandey
20100061269 March 11, 2010 Banerjee
20100074175 March 25, 2010 Banks
20100097941 April 22, 2010 Carlson
20100103813 April 29, 2010 Allan
20100103939 April 29, 2010 Carlson
20100131636 May 27, 2010 Suri
20100158024 June 24, 2010 Sajassi
20100165877 July 1, 2010 Shukia
20100165995 July 1, 2010 Mehta
20100168467 July 1, 2010 Johnston
20100169467 July 1, 2010 Shukia
20100169948 July 1, 2010 Budko
20100182920 July 22, 2010 Matsuoka
20100215049 August 26, 2010 Raza
20100220724 September 2, 2010 Rabie
20100226368 September 9, 2010 Mack-Crane
20100226381 September 9, 2010 Mehta
20100246388 September 30, 2010 Gupta
20100257263 October 7, 2010 Casado
20100271960 October 28, 2010 Krygowski
20100272107 October 28, 2010 Papp
20100281106 November 4, 2010 Ashwood-Smith
20100284414 November 11, 2010 Agarwal
20100284418 November 11, 2010 Gray
20100287262 November 11, 2010 Elzur
20100287548 November 11, 2010 Zhou
20100290473 November 18, 2010 Enduri
20100299527 November 25, 2010 Arunan
20100303071 December 2, 2010 Kotalwar
20100303075 December 2, 2010 Tripathi
20100303083 December 2, 2010 Belanger
20100309820 December 9, 2010 Rajagopalan
20100309912 December 9, 2010 Mehta
20100329110 December 30, 2010 Rose
20110019678 January 27, 2011 Mehta
20110032945 February 10, 2011 Mullooly
20110035489 February 10, 2011 McDaniel
20110035498 February 10, 2011 Shah
20110044339 February 24, 2011 Kotalwar
20110044352 February 24, 2011 Chaitou
20110064086 March 17, 2011 Xiong
20110064089 March 17, 2011 Hidaka
20110072208 March 24, 2011 Gulati
20110085560 April 14, 2011 Chawla
20110085563 April 14, 2011 Kotha
20110110266 May 12, 2011 Li
20110134802 June 9, 2011 Rajagopalan
20110134803 June 9, 2011 Dalvi
20110134925 June 9, 2011 Safrai
20110142053 June 16, 2011 Van Der Merwe
20110142062 June 16, 2011 Wang
20110161494 June 30, 2011 McDysan
20110161695 June 30, 2011 Okita
20110188373 August 4, 2011 Saito
20110194403 August 11, 2011 Sajassi
20110194563 August 11, 2011 Shen
20110228780 September 22, 2011 Ashwood-Smith
20110231570 September 22, 2011 Altekar
20110231574 September 22, 2011 Saunderson
20110235523 September 29, 2011 Jha
20110243133 October 6, 2011 Villait
20110243136 October 6, 2011 Raman
20110246669 October 6, 2011 Kanada
20110255538 October 20, 2011 Srinivasan
20110255540 October 20, 2011 Mizrahi
20110261828 October 27, 2011 Smith
20110268120 November 3, 2011 Vobbilisetty
20110268125 November 3, 2011 Vobbilisetty
20110273988 November 10, 2011 Tourrilhes
20110274114 November 10, 2011 Dhar
20110280572 November 17, 2011 Vobbilisetty
20110286457 November 24, 2011 Ee
20110296052 December 1, 2011 Guo
20110299391 December 8, 2011 Vobbilisetty
20110299413 December 8, 2011 Chatwani
20110299414 December 8, 2011 Yu
20110299527 December 8, 2011 Yu
20110299528 December 8, 2011 Yu
20110299531 December 8, 2011 Yu
20110299532 December 8, 2011 Yu
20110299533 December 8, 2011 Yu
20110299534 December 8, 2011 Koganti
20110299535 December 8, 2011 Vobbilisetty et al.
20110299536 December 8, 2011 Cheng et al.
20110317559 December 29, 2011 Kern
20110317703 December 29, 2011 Dunbar et al.
20120011240 January 12, 2012 Hara
20120014261 January 19, 2012 Salam
20120014387 January 19, 2012 Dunbar
20120020220 January 26, 2012 Sugita
20120027017 February 2, 2012 Rai
20120033663 February 9, 2012 Guichard
20120033665 February 9, 2012 Jacob Da Silva
20120033669 February 9, 2012 Mohandas
20120075991 March 29, 2012 Sugita
20120099567 April 26, 2012 Hart
20120099602 April 26, 2012 Nagapudi
20120106339 May 3, 2012 Mishra
20120131097 May 24, 2012 Baykal
20120131289 May 24, 2012 Taguchi
20120147740 June 14, 2012 Nakash
20120158997 June 21, 2012 Hsu
20120163164 June 28, 2012 Terry
20120177039 July 12, 2012 Berman
20120243359 September 27, 2012 Keesara
20120243539 September 27, 2012 Keesara
20120275347 November 1, 2012 Banerjee
20120294192 November 22, 2012 Masood
20120294194 November 22, 2012 Balasubramanian
20120320800 December 20, 2012 Kamble
20120320926 December 20, 2012 Kamath et al.
20120327766 December 27, 2012 Tsai et al.
20120327937 December 27, 2012 Melman et al.
20130003535 January 3, 2013 Sarwar
20130003737 January 3, 2013 Sinicrope
20130003738 January 3, 2013 Koganti
20130028072 January 31, 2013 Addanki
20130034015 February 7, 2013 Jaiswal
20130067466 March 14, 2013 Combs
20130070762 March 21, 2013 Adams
20130114595 May 9, 2013 Mack-Crane et al.
20130127848 May 23, 2013 Joshi
20130194914 August 1, 2013 Agarwal
20130219473 August 22, 2013 Schaefer
20130250951 September 26, 2013 Koganti
20130259037 October 3, 2013 Natarajan
20130272135 October 17, 2013 Leong
20130301642 November 14, 2013 Radhakrishnan
20140044126 February 13, 2014 Sabhanatarajan
20140105034 April 17, 2014 Sun
Foreign Patent Documents
102801599 November 2012 CN
0579567 May 1993 EP
1398920 March 2004 EP
1916807 April 2008 EP
2001167 December 2008 EP
2008056838 May 2008 WO
2009042919 April 2009 WO
2010111142 September 2010 WO
2014031781 February 2014 WO
Other references
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/312,903 Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,808 Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,993 Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873 Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526 Office Action dated May 22, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526 Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102 Office Action dated May 16, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102 Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301 Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301 Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,688 Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806 Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806 Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,360 Office Action dated May 31, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,864 Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968 Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968 Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877 Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974 Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974 Office Action dated May 24, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752 Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752 Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701 Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701 Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460 Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259 Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259 Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580 Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724 Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724 Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490 Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490 Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239 Office Action dated May 22, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239 Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249 Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249 Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2012.
  • Brocade Unveils “The Effortless Network”, http://newsroom.brocade.com/press-releases/brocade-unveils-the-effortless-network--nasdaq-brcd-0859535, 2012.
  • Foundry FastIron Configuration Guide, Software Release FSX 04.2.00b, Software Release FWS 04.3.00, Software Release FGS 05.0.00a, Sep. 26, 2008.
  • FastIron and TurboIron 24X Configuration Guide Supporting FSX 05.1.00 for FESX, FWSX, and FSX; FGS 04.3.03 for FGS, FLS and FWS; FGS 05.0.02 for FGS-STK and FLS-STK, FCX 06.0.00 for FCX; and TIX 04.1.00 for TI24X, Feb. 16, 2010.
  • FastIron Configuration Guide Supporting Ironware Software Release 07.0.00, Dec. 18, 2009.
  • “The Effortless Network: HyperEdge Technology for the Campus LAN”, 2012.
  • Narten, T. et al. “Problem Statement: Overlays for Network Virtualization”, draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01, Oct. 31, 2011.
  • Knight, Paul et al., “Layer 2 and 3 Virtual Private Networks: Taxonomy, Technology, and Standardization Efforts”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jun. 2004.
  • “An Introduction to Brocade VCS Fabric Technology”, Brocade white paper, http://community.brocade.com/docs/DOC-2954, Dec. 3, 2012.
  • Kreeger, L. et al., “Network Virtualization Overlay Control Protocol Requirements”, Draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00, Jan. 30, 2012.
  • Knight, Paul et al., “Network based IP VPN Architecture using Virtual Routers”, May 2003.
  • Louati, Wajdi et al., “Network-based virtual personal overlay networks using programmable virtual routers”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jul. 2005.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877 Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326 Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2013.
  • Abawajy J. “An Approach to Support a Single Service Provider Address Image for Wide Area Networks Environment” Centre for Parallel and Distributed Computing, School of Computer Science Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, filed Mar. 20, 2012, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/786,328, filed Mar. 5, 2013, dated Mar. 13, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/577,785, filed Dec. 19, 2014, dated Apr. 13, 2015.
  • Mahalingam “VXLAN: A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 Networks” Oct. 17, 2013 pp. 1-22, Sections 1, 4 and 4.1.
  • Office action dated Apr. 30, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,438, filed Oct. 19, 2012.
  • Office Action dated May 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/288,822, filed Nov. 3, 2011.
  • Siamak Azodolmolky et al. “Cloud computing networking: Challenges and opportunities for innovations”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, No. 7, Jul. 1, 2013.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2015 U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,438, filed Oct. 19, 2012.
  • Office action dated Jun. 8, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,042, filed Feb. 11, 2014.
  • Office Action Dated Jun. 10, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/890,150, filed May 8, 2013.
  • “Switched Virtual Internetworking moved beyond bridges and routers”, 8178 Data Communications Sep. 23, 1994, No. 12, New York.
  • S. Night et al., “Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol”, Network Working Group, XP-002135272, Apr. 1998.
  • Eastlake 3rd., Donald et al., “RBridges: TRILL Header Options”, Draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-options-00.txt Dec. 24, 2009.
  • J. Touch, et al., “Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement”, May 2009.
  • Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridge VLAN Mapping”, Draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-vlan-mapping-01.txt Dec. 4, 2009.
  • Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) 6.2 Virtual Fabrics Feature Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Perlman, Radia “Challenges and Opportunities in the Design of TRILL: a Routed layer 2 Technology”, XP-002649647, 2009.
  • Nadas, S. et al., “Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6”, Mar. 2010.
  • Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridges: Base Protocol Specification”, draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-protocol-16.txt, Mar. 3, 2010.
  • Christensen, M. et al., “Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Snooping Switches”, May 2006.
  • Lapuh, Roger et al., “Split Multi-link Trunking (SMLT)”, Oct. 2002.
  • Lapuh, Roger et al., “Split Multi-link Trunking (SMLT) draft-lapuh-network-smlt-08”, 2008.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012, dated Feb. 28, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2012, dated Feb. 20, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,843, filed Jun. 26, 2012, dated Oct. 21, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011, dated Nov. 12, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Nov. 29, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011, dated Dec. 2, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011, dated Jan. 16, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jan. 10, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jan. 6, 2014.
  • Zhai F. Hu et al. “RBridge: Pseudo-Nickname; draft-hu-trill-pseudonode-nickname-02.txt”, May 15, 2012.
  • Huang, Nen-Fu et al., “An Effective Spanning Tree Algorithm for a Bridged LAN”, Mar. 16, 1992.
  • Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,357, filed Nov. 5, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2012.
  • Office Action dated May 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/533,843, filed Jun. 26, 2012.
  • Office Action dated May 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/484,072, filed May 30, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/440,861, filed Apr. 5, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, filed Mar. 20, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
  • Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Brocade ‘An Introduction to Brocade VCS Fabric Technology’, Dec. 3, 2012.
  • Lapuh, Roger et al., ‘Split Multi-link Trunking (SMLT) draft-lapuh-network-smlt-08’, Jan. 2009.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,688, filed Feb. 18, 2011, dated Jul. 17, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,993, filed Feb. 3, 2012, from Cho, Hong Sol., dated Jul. 23, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011, dated Dec. 3, 2012.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011, dated Jun. 13, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239, filed Apr. 14, 2011, dated Dec. 5, 2012.
  • Office action dated Apr. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249, filed Mar. 16, 2010.
  • Office action dated Sep. 12, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/725,249, filed Mar. 16, 2010.
  • Office action dated Dec. 21, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
  • Office action dated Mar. 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jul. 9, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
  • Office action dated May 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239, filed Apr. 14, 2011.
  • Office action dated Dec. 5, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/087,239, filed Apr. 14, 2011.
  • Office action dated Feb. 5, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,724, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jan. 10, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jun. 10, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,580, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jan. 16, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011.
  • Office action dated Mar. 18, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jun. 21, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jan. 28, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jul. 3, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,701, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jul. 18, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Dec. 20, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
  • Office action dated May 24, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
  • Office action dated Jan. 6, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Sep. 5, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Mar. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jan. 4, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
  • Office action dated Jun. 7, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/950,968, filed Nov. 19, 2010.
  • Office action dated Sep. 19, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,864, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated May 31, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,360, filed Apr. 29, 2011.
  • Office action dated Oct. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
  • Office action dated Dec. 3, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jun. 11, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,806, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
  • Office action dated Apr. 25, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,688, filed Feb. 18, 2011.
  • Office action dated Feb. 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jun. 11, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
  • Office action dated Oct. 26, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011.
  • Office action dated May 16, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011.
  • Office action dated Aug. 4, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jan. 28, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/148,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011.
  • Office action dated Dec. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011.
  • Office action dated May 22, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/148,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011.
  • Office action dated Nov. 29, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jun. 19, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jul. 18, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,808, filed Feb. 3, 2012.
  • Office action dated Nov. 12, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jun. 13, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,887, dated Jan. 6, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011, dated Mar. 27, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Jul. 7, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Apr. 9, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jul. 25, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Jun. 20, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/312,903, filed Dec. 6, 2011, dated Aug. 7, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/351,513, filed Jan. 17, 2012, dated Jul. 24, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, filed Mar. 20, 2012, dated Mar. 6, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/556,061, filed Jul. 23, 2012, dated Jun. 6, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,207 dated Jul. 24, 2014, filed Jan. 15, 2013.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,974, filed Nov. 19, 2010, from Haile, Awet A., dated Dec. 2, 2012.
  • Perlman R: ‘Challenges and opportunities in the design of TRILL: a routed layer 2 technology’, 2009 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops, Honolulu, HI, USA, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Nov. 30, 2009, pp. 1-6, XP002649647, DOI: 10.1109/GLOBECOM.2009.5360776 ISBN: 1-4244-5626-0 [retrieved on Jul. 19, 2011].
  • TRILL Working Group Internet-Draft Intended status: Proposed Standard RBridges: Base Protocol Specificaiton Mar. 3, 2010.
  • Office action dated Aug. 14, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Office action dated Jul. 7, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,326, filed Mar. 9, 2011.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,873, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Nov. 7, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,877, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Nov. 10, 2014.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/157,942, filed Jun. 10, 2011.
  • Mckeown, Nick et al. “OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks”, Mar. 14, 2008, www.openflow.org/documents/openflow-wp-latest.pdf.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, dated Mar. 9, 2011.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/184,526, filed Jul. 16, 2011, dated Jan. 5, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2012, dated Jan. 5, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/669,357, filed Nov. 5, 2012, dated Jan. 30, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/851,026, filed Mar. 26, 2013, dated Jan. 30, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,460, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Mar. 13, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/425,238, dated Mar. 12, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011, dated Feb. 27, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,259, filed Mar. 7, 2011, dated Feb. 23, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,301, filed Mar. 9, 2011, dated Jan. 29, 2015.
  • Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/050,102, filed Mar. 17, 2011, dated Jan. 26, 2015.
  • Office action dated Oct. 2, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/092,752, filed Apr. 22, 2011.
  • Kompella, Ed K. et al., ‘Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and Signaling’ Jan. 2007.
  • Rosen, E. et al., “BGP/MPLS VPNs”, Mar. 1999.
  • “Switched Virtual Internetworking moves beyond bridges and routers”, Sep. 23, 1994, No. 12, New York, US.
  • Knight, S. et al. “Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol”, Apr. 1998, XP-002135272.
  • Eastlake, Donald et al., “RBridges: TRILL Header Options”, Dec. 2009.
  • Touch, J. et al., “Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement”, May 2009.
  • Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridge VLAN Mapping”, Dec. 2009.
  • “Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) 6.2 Virtual Fabrics Feature Frequently Asked Questions”.
  • Perlman, Radia et al., “RBridges: Base Protocol Specification”, Mar. 2010.
  • Office Action dated Jun. 18, 215, U.S. Appl. No. 13/098,490, filed May 2, 2011.
  • Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/048,817, filed Mar. 15, 2011.
  • Touch, J. et al., ‘Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Problem and Applicability Statement’, May 2009, Network Working Group, pp. 1-17.
  • Zhai F. Hu et al. ‘RBridge: Pseudo-Nickname; draft-hu-trill-pseudonode-nickname-02.txt’, May 15, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,204, filed Aug. 29, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/473,941, filed Aug. 29, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/488,173, filed Sep. 16, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/776,217, filed Feb. 25, 2013.
  • Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,374, filed Jan. 15, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/151,693, filed Jan. 9, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/577,785, filed Dec. 19, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2015 U.S. Appl. No. 13/656,438, filed Oct. 19, 2012.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/178,042, filed Feb. 11, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/215,996, filed Mar. 17, 2014.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,566, filed Jan. 6, 2012.
Patent History
Patent number: 9270572
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 6, 2011
Date of Patent: Feb 23, 2016
Patent Publication Number: 20120281700
Assignee: BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS INC. (San Jose, CA)
Inventors: Phanidhar Koganti (Sunnyvale, CA), Anoop Ghanwani (Rocklin, CA), Suresh Vobbilisetty (San Jose, CA), Rajiv Krishnamurthy (San Jose, CA), Nagarajan Venkatesan (San Jose, CA), Shunjia Yu (San Jose, CA)
Primary Examiner: Andrew Lai
Assistant Examiner: Zhiren Qin
Application Number: 13/312,903
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Switching A Message Which Includes An Address Header (370/389)
International Classification: H04L 12/18 (20060101); H04L 12/751 (20130101);