Process and apparatus for selecting an item from a database

- Kannuu Pty Ltd

A database for selecting database items, where the database items are indexed by a list of item identifiers. The item identifiers may be in the form of text. An initial display is generated which includes one or more parts of the item identifiers. Selection of the one or more parts may be made and results in the generation of a display of a further one or more parts for selection. The further one or more parts may be selected in order to add to the selected one or more parts to build a larger part or whole of an item identifier. Selection from a large list of item identifiers may be carried out in a relatively short time period.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/627,914 filed Feb. 20, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/166,465 filed Jan. 28, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,996,579 issued Mar. 31, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/736,548 filed on Jan. 8, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,676,852 issued Mar. 18, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/349,204 filed on Jan. 12, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,375,058 issued on Feb. 12, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application No. 11/990,338 filed Aug. 26, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,140,560, issued Mar. 20, 2012, which is the National Phase application of International Application No. PCT/AU2006/001151, filed Aug. 11, 2006, which designates the United States and was published in English and which claims the benefit to Australian provisional application no. 2005904378, filed Aug. 12, 2005. Each of these applications, in their entirety, are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved process and apparatus for selecting an item from a database, and more particularly, but not exclusively, relates to a method and apparatus for rapidly selecting items from a list of items identified by a text field.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

There are many applications on computing devices which require selection from a list where the item identifier for the list is text based. These include selecting a contact from an address book, selecting a record from a database, selecting a word from a dictionary, etc.

The user of such systems has to enter enough information to narrow a search of the list down to a single entry to be selected. This usually entails entering several of the initial letters of the search term resulting in a smaller subset of the list, then scrolling through the subset to manually point out the desired item.

This can be a cumbersome process requiring the user to be able to enter any letter in their language's alphabet as well as possibly numbers and other symbols. This is particularly onerous on small, hand held devices such as mobile phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), remote controls, etc.

On hand held devices with a keypad such as mobile phones (FIG. 1), the entry of alphabetic characters as well as numerics and symbols is achieved through a cumbersome system of multiply pressing the 12 number keys (0 to 9 and “*” and “#”). This method has the disadvantages of:

    • Being a complicated, unnatural system which needs to be learnt,
    • Requiring accurate presses of generally very small buttons resulting in accidental pressing of adjacent buttons,
    • Requiring the user to be able to read and discern very small labels on the buttons,
    • Requiring constant shift of gaze between buttons and screen to track the input,
    • Only allowing the entry of one character at a time, not a group of characters at a time.

Other handheld devices take input through a touch screen such as PDAs (FIG. 2). These allow text input through generally two methods: an on-screen keyboard and handwriting recognition.

The on-screen keyboard method involves presenting an image of a keyboard on the screen. The buttons on this on-screen keyboard are too small to be selected using fingers so a stylus is required. This results in a slow, error prone selection of individual characters with the disadvantages:

    • Access to numbers and additional symbols usually requiring at least two presses as they require the keyboard to go into another mode to allow access to them,
    • Small key images are hard to see for those with any impairment of vision and hard to select for those with limited dexterity,
    • Characters are only entered one at a time.

Handwriting recognition systems have the disadvantage of a high error rate in recognising characters unless either the system is trained with the user's handwriting or the user learns a set of distinctive ways to input letters that are amenable to the device's programming. This method has the disadvantages of:

    • Needing a stylus for input,
    • Being slow to enter each letter,
    • Requiring a constant cycle of entry, checking of accuracy of the entry and correction of misinterpretation of entries,
    • Characters are only entered one at a time.

Even using a fully fledged keyboard to specify the characters to select an object has disadvantages:

    • It is still necessary to enter one character at a time,
    • It is still necessary to enter enough characters to generate a manageable subset list and then select from it, the alternative would be to enter sufficient characters each time to uniquely identify the entry which may require almost all of the entry to be specified,
    • Except for adept touch typists there is still a need to constantly move one's gaze between the keyboard and the screen.

There is need for an improved method of selecting items from a list.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of selecting database items from a database, the database items being indexed by a list of item identifiers, the method comprising the steps of:

generating an initial display including one or more parts of item identifiers for selection,

enabling selection of the one or more parts and in response to selection of the one or more parts,

generating a display of a further one or more parts for selection, and

enabling selection of the further one or more parts in order to add to the selected one or more parts to build a larger part or whole of an item identifier.

In one embodiment, the invention entails a method of selecting an item from a list indexed by a text based field. Preferably, the invention allows for selection from the list by presenting one or more word sections, (the item identifier parts in this embodiment), containing one or more characters, at a time in a list for the user to select from.

Preferably, the word sections presented are based on a knowledge of the text indices in the list and the likelihood of the word sections to be the ones the user wants to enter.

Preferably, where the list of expected word sections does not contain the desired entry the user is given an option to list “more” word sections and is presented with a new list which indicates the next most likely set of word sections.

Preferably, when a word section is selected, a new list of word sections is presented to form a continuation of the text selection based on the word sections selected so far being the start of the desired selection

Preferably, once all the word sections have been selected, the item in the list is identified and any associated action, such as presenting a telephone book contact's contact details, is carried out.

Preferably, the word sections are presented as labels on the screen to be selected by various methods depending on the type of device.

Preferably, where the device is a PC, the word sections would be selected by mouse presses or mapping to keyboard keys.

Preferably, where the device has a touch screen such as PDA or Tablet PC, the word sections would be selected by pointing at the labels with either a finger or stylus.

Preferably, where the device has a small screen and a joystick such as a mobile telephone or watch sized device, the word sections should be selectable from a menu which indicates which word section is selected for corresponding movements of the joystick.

Preferably, where the device has function keys with the ability to associate an on-screen label with a button press the word sections would be presented for selection as labels with corresponding function keys.

In accordance with a second aspect, the present invention provides a method of selecting database items from a database, the database items being indexed by a list of item identifiers, comprising the steps of enabling a display of one or more parts of item identifiers for selection, the item identifiers being generated on a display being chosen for generation in accordance with predetermined criteria.

In accordance with a third aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus for selecting database items from a database, the database items being indexed by a list of item identifiers, the apparatus comprising a display, an input means, a generating means for generating an initial display including one or more parts of item identifiers for selection, means for enabling selection via the input means of the one or more parts, means responsive to selection of the one or more parts for generating a display of a further one or more parts for selection, means enabling selection via the input means of the further one or more parts, and addition means to add the further one or more parts to the selected one or more parts to build a larger, or whole of an item identifier.

In accordance with a fourth aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus for selecting database items from a database, the database items being indexed by a list of item identifiers, comprising a means enabling a display of one or more parts of item identifiers for selection, the means selecting the item identifiers for display in accordance with predetermined criteria.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of embodiments thereof, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a representation of a traditional mobile telephone layout.

FIG. 2 is a representation of a touch screen input device.

FIG. 3 is a representation of a traditional address book at start of selection process. Image shows first four entries in address book with selection indicator over first one. There is no entry in search refinement field.

FIG. 4 is a representation of a selection from reduced list of contacts from an address book using a traditional selection process. Image shows user has entered “je” to refine the search to a manageable number of entries and then used the cursor to move the highlight to specify “Jessie Lares”

FIG. 5 is a representation of an opening joystick based selection menu using the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a representation name partially specified using the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a representation of an example table of words.

FIG. 8 is a representation of an example structure of tree for words in example table.

FIG. 9 is a representation of a touch screen option selection.

 DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The following description of the present invention relates to selection of a contact from an address book of a mobile telephone. The invention is however not limited to this application and may be implemented on any device with computational processing ability on any list which is indexed by a text based value.

The conventional way of selecting a contact from an address book on a mobile telephone entails the user following the sequence:

    • 1. The user starts the address book application and is presented with a the full list of all contacts in the address book, (FIG. 3)
    • 2. Using the multi-tap feature on the device to enter characters with multiple presses of keypad keys, the user enters the first letter of the name they want to find,
    • 3. This results in the list of names presented changing from the entire address book to only those names starting with the specified letter,
    • 4. The user can now decided to use the joystick to move the selection to the desired contact and select it (FIG. 4), if however the list is still too long the user goes back to step 2 above to enter the next character and proceeds until the list is short enough to find the contact,
    • 5. Once the contact is selected, their information is presented and the user is given the option of calling them, emailing them, etc.

In an embodiment of the current invention the above process can be streamlined greatly by presenting the user with the following sequence:

    • 1. The user starts the address book application which is implemented based on the present invention, the user is presented with 4 strings in a circular menu indicating the strings are selected by movements of the joystick in the directions left, right, up and down (FIG. 5), these initial four options are the four most likely word sections in the database at the start of a contact name based on an analysis of the frequency of words in the address book;
    • 2. If the user sees the word section that starts, or is a continuation of, the contact they want to select they move the joystick in the indicated direction to select that word section, appending it to the name thus far specified. The next set of most likely word sections which continue the name thus far specified are then presented (FIG. 6), if the selection is not complete the user repeats this step 2;
    • 3. If the word section the user desires is not presented they activate the “more” function, in this case a press in of the joystick to be presented with the next most likely set of four options to continue the name thus far specified, the user then repeats step 2;
    • 4. Once the user has completed the name the user is then presented with their information and the user is given the option of calling them, emailing them, etc.

Using an address book application implemented with the present invention as described above has the following advantages over the traditional system as described previously:

    • There are significantly less key presses or movements of the joystick as the mostly letters are presented first and it is likely that it will be possible to specify several letters of the name at a time,
    • Only the joystick has been used so there is no need to transfer the thumb or finger between buttons and risk mis-hitting buttons,
    • The labels selected from are presented on the screen rather than being printed on the buttons meaning the user is able to maintain their gaze on the screen the entire time rather than constantly flick between the screen and the keypad,
    • Another advantage of on-screen labels is that it is possible to increase the size of the labels to make them more readable for those with vision impairment, an option not possible for labels on small keypad keys.

It should be obvious to someone skilled in the art that the present invention has much broader application than just the example listed above, as well as a mobile phone, the present invention can be used to improve list selection on other devices including but not limited to personal computers, tablet PCs, PDAs, remote controls and small watch sized devices.

Also, as well as the above sample application the present invention can be used to select an item from any list which is indexed by a text based value. The list could be of any size from a handful of entries to a large database of thousands or even millions of entries. The list does not just have to be contacts in an address book, applications could include but are not limited to selection from any text indexed database, for example a list of products in an inventory, selection of word definitions from a dictionary, selection of answers from an FAQ (Frequently Asked Question) document, etc.

Implementation

Preferably the present invention would be implemented as software within an application which maintains or allows viewing of some list of information. The list would be accessible through an index field which is text based. The text may be based on any language or symbolic system as long as it can be represented on the screen for selection.

Table of Values

FIG. 7 shows an example table of words which may be the text string indices from which a selection is to be made.

Hierarchical Tree

In order to facilitate selection from the list of text indices using the present invention, the list needs to be processed as a hierarchical tree of word sections. In one variation of the implementation of the present invention in software there may be a pre-processing phase where the list of indices is analysed and the hierarchical tree is generated and stored in some computer accessible memory to assist processing.

The hierarchical tree of word sections is an internal representation of the structure of the words in the list. Where words share the same starting letter or letters those words are added under the same node, where words diverge a branch in the hierarchical tree is formed. This process continues to form further entries and branches down the tree to correspond with the subsequent letters in the words.

As an example, the logical hierarchical tree structure for the list in FIG. 7 is illustrated in FIG. 8. As can be seen, where words have common letters in sequence they share a node in the tree structure, where the characters diverge (for example after the first “n” for “Andrew Jones” and “Anne Parkes”) a branch in the tree is formed.

Node Rankings

Associated with each end node is a ranking value. In the most basic of systems this value would be one for each end node but in other systems it could be any number representing a ranking, for instance for a phone book application the number could be the number of times that contact was accessed giving more frequently used contacts higher priority.

For the branch nodes in the tree their rankling value is the sum of all the ranking values of the nodes immediately below them in the tree.

Presenting Options

In an implementation of the present invention, the system presents word section options. The number of options presented depends on the mode by which the options are being selected. On a touch screen the options may be in a 3 by 2 grid to be selected by a stylus (FIG. 9)—in this case the system would be generating up to 5 word sections at a time leaving the sixth menu option to indicate “more” where none of the presented 5 options is applicable.

In the case of a menu driven by a joystick such as that which is commonly found on a mobile phone the system could present up to 4 word section options indicated by presses of the joystick in the four directions (left, right, up and down) and having a press in of the joystick to indicate “more”.

Each word section option presented corresponds to a node in the notional hierarchical tree. In order to determine which nodes to present the system will use the following logic:

    • 1. Exclude nodes which have already been presented (i.e. they have been presented to the user and the user has selected “more” to indicate none of those presented are appropriate)
    • 2. Select the nodes with the highest ranking values
    • 3. When assessing the ranking value subtract the ranking value of any nodes below this node in the tree that have been selected. For example, in FIG. 8 ranking value for the node with the string “J” is 5 but if the node for “ohm_” is included in the selection the ranking for “J” should be treated as 2, the sum of the rankings of the unselected nodes.
    • 4. Point 3 above means some iterations may be performed to select the optimum node set
    • 5. Select up to the number of menu choices that are presentable.

Thus for our example tree in FIG. 8 if four word section are to be selected for a joystick based interface, the first four options would be:

WORD SECTION RANKING VALUE “An” 2 “John_” 3 “J” 2 (ranking of “J” minus ranking of “ohn_” which is presented separately) “Peter Smith” 1

FIG. 5 shows how this selection set may be represented on a joystick based interface.

If the user was to select the “John_” option then the options to be presented would be:

WORD SECTION RANKING “Smith” 1 “Sykes” 1 “Jones” 1

FIG. 6 shows how this selection set may be represented on a joystick based interface.

If the user was to select the “An” option from the original menu then the options to be presented would be:

WORD SECTION RANKING VALUE “drew_Jones” 1 “ne_Parkes” 1

Once the user selects a word section that takes them to the end of the index then the item has been uniquely specified and the system can then perform the processing applicable to the application. In the example of a phone book system the user may be presented with options to initiate a phone call or send a text message to the contact.

As can be seen from the above example, even using just a joystick it is possible to very rapidly narrow a text based search to a single entry with very few joystick actions using the present invention. While the example presented is based on a trivial number of entries, the present invention provides a significant increase in efficiency of selections from lists with many more items as well.

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.

Claims

1. A system for selecting database items from a database, the database items being indexed by a list of item identifiers, the system comprising:

a hardware processor,
a memory, coupled to the hardware processor, having stored thereon instructions which when executed by the hardware processor, cause the hardware processor to implement the following steps of: generating an initial display including one or more parts of item identifiers for selection by a user, receiving the selection from the user of the one or more parts; generating a display of further one or more parts of item identifiers for selection in response to the selection of the one or more parts of item identifiers, wherein: the further one or more parts of item identifiers being selected for display based at least in part on a ranking scheme, the further one of more parts of item identifiers being arranged on the display relative to one another and corresponding to at least an up, down, left or right position, and the highest ranked of the further one or more parts of item identifiers being positioned in one of the up, down, left, and right positions; and receiving the selection from the user, of the further one or more parts of item identifiers in order to add to the selected one or more parts to build a larger part or whole of a particular item identifier; wherein the selected one or more parts of item identifiers and the selected further one or more parts of item identifiers are shorter than a complete word; and wherein selection of the further one or more parts of item identifiers is enabled by a key press corresponding to the relative arrangement of the further one or more parts of item identifiers on the display.

2. The system in accordance with claim 1, further comprising the further steps of:

iterating the selection steps until the particular item identifier is completed, and
enabling selection, by the user, of the complete particular item identifier to select the database item.

3. The system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the step of generating the initial display includes selecting the one or more parts of item identifiers to be displayed based on at least one predetermined criterion.

4. The system in accordance with claim 3, wherein the at least one predetermined criterion is a frequency of selection of database items associated within the one or more parts of item identifiers.

5. The system in accordance with claim 3, wherein the at least one predetermined criterion is a ranking of the one or more parts of item identifiers in relation to a tree hierarchy classification of the one or more parts of item identifiers.

6. The system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the generating the initial display of the one or more parts of item identifiers includes displaying a plurality of parts of item identifiers.

7. The system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the step of generating the display includes displaying an entire item identifier.

8. The system in accordance with claim 1, wherein at least one of the item identifiers includes one or more alphanumeric characters.

9. The system in accordance with claim 8, wherein the particular item identifier includes a text string.

10. The system in accordance with claim 9, wherein the particular item identifier includes a word.

11. The system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the database is stored in a memory of a computing device.

12. The system in accordance with claim 11, wherein the computing device is a mobile telephone.

13. The system in accordance with claim 12, wherein the selections of the one or more parts of item identifiers and the further one or more parts of item identifiers are allowed by way of a joystick.

14. The system in accordance with claim 11, wherein the computing device is a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA).

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3937939 February 10, 1976 Frenkel
5128672 July 7, 1992 Kaehler
5263174 November 16, 1993 Layman
5299125 March 29, 1994 Baker et al.
5398023 March 14, 1995 Murray
5496992 March 5, 1996 Madan et al.
5633912 May 27, 1997 Tsoi
5724069 March 3, 1998 Chen
5754655 May 19, 1998 Hughes et al.
5787417 July 28, 1998 Hargrove
5797098 August 18, 1998 Schroeder et al.
5867799 February 2, 1999 Lang et al.
5894276 April 13, 1999 Altidor et al.
5896321 April 20, 1999 Miller et al.
5901222 May 4, 1999 Macor
5911485 June 15, 1999 Rossman
5953541 September 14, 1999 King et al.
5983214 November 9, 1999 Lang et al.
6009444 December 28, 1999 Chen
6011554 January 4, 2000 King et al.
6032053 February 29, 2000 Schroeder et al.
6047196 April 4, 2000 Makela et al.
6055439 April 25, 2000 Helin et al.
6150962 November 21, 2000 Rossmann
6223059 April 24, 2001 Heaestrup
6247043 June 12, 2001 Bates et al.
6264146 July 24, 2001 Hill et al.
6311125 October 30, 2001 Okano et al.
6377965 April 23, 2002 Hachamovitch et al.
6580932 June 17, 2003 Finke-Anlauff
6744423 June 1, 2004 Kraft et al.
6748242 June 8, 2004 Dunleavy
6792287 September 14, 2004 Tuomela et al.
6826566 November 30, 2004 Lewak et al.
7185286 February 27, 2007 Zondervan et al.
7443316 October 28, 2008 Lim
7487147 February 3, 2009 Bates et al.
7543244 June 2, 2009 Matthews et al.
7616191 November 10, 2009 Matta
7669111 February 23, 2010 Krause et al.
7793228 September 7, 2010 Mansfield et al.
7836044 November 16, 2010 Kamvar et al.
7886233 February 8, 2011 Rainisto et al.
20010012769 August 9, 2001 Sirola et al.
20010018351 August 30, 2001 Hino et al.
20020049795 April 25, 2002 Freeman
20020061770 May 23, 2002 Ozaki
20020087979 July 4, 2002 Dudkiewicz
20020091690 July 11, 2002 Bailey et al.
20020151327 October 17, 2002 Levitt
20020183099 December 5, 2002 Lee
20030073414 April 17, 2003 Capps
20030078069 April 24, 2003 Lindeman
20030182274 September 25, 2003 Oh
20040105714 June 3, 2004 Eo
20040163032 August 19, 2004 Guo et al.
20040186819 September 23, 2004 Baker
20040192276 September 30, 2004 Wesby
20050010605 January 13, 2005 Conrad et al.
20050188330 August 25, 2005 Griffin
20050233769 October 20, 2005 Tanaka et al.
20050270270 December 8, 2005 Chadha
20060009861 January 12, 2006 Bonasia et al.
20060031591 February 9, 2006 Hollstrom et al.
20060146028 July 6, 2006 Chang et al.
20060217953 September 28, 2006 Parikh
20060221058 October 5, 2006 Fux et al.
20060265208 November 23, 2006 Assadollahi
20060265648 November 23, 2006 Rainisto
20060265668 November 23, 2006 Rainisto
20060293889 December 28, 2006 Kiss
20060294462 December 28, 2006 Blair et al.
20070016862 January 18, 2007 Kuzmin
20070060114 March 15, 2007 Ramer et al.
20070089070 April 19, 2007 Jaczyk
20070179776 August 2, 2007 Segond et al.
20090192786 July 30, 2009 Assadollahi
20090327888 December 31, 2009 Woolf et al.
20100010963 January 14, 2010 Dinn
Foreign Patent Documents
1199302 November 1998 CN
3123596 June 1981 DE
10019727 October 2001 DE
624965 November 1994 EP
789224 August 1997 EP
1022644 July 2000 EP
2751442 January 1998 FR
2317531 March 1998 GB
2357220 June 2001 GB
2363290 December 2001 GB
09-083402 July 1995 JP
407240776 September 1995 JP
10293640 November 1998 JP
2000267787 September 2000 JP
2002149345 May 2002 JP
2005-159250 July 2005 JP
1011027 September 2000 NL
00/49731 August 2000 WO
00/59181 October 2000 WO
01/05047 January 2001 WO
01/67725 September 2001 WO
02/08876 January 2002 WO
02/13001 February 2002 WO
WO 02/39244 May 2002 WO
WO 02/069240 September 2002 WO
02/093338 November 2002 WO
03021418 March 2003 WO
WO 03/077102 September 2003 WO
WO 2004/017188 February 2004 WO
2005/064445 July 2005 WO
2006/100505 September 2006 WO
2007/019610 February 2007 WO
WO 2008/080192 July 2008 WO
WO 2008/106729 September 2008 WO
Other references
  • European Search Report dated Dec. 1, 2006 for PCT/AU2002/01114.
  • International Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2008 from International Application No. PCT/AU2008/000297.
  • International Search Report dated Feb. 6, 2008 from International Application No. PCT/AU2007/002010.
  • International Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2002 from International Application No. PCT/AU2002/001154.
  • International Search Report dated Aug. 29, 2006 from International Application No. PCT/AU2006/001151.
  • International Search Report dated Oct. 16, 2002 from International Application No. PCT/AU2002/01114.
  • “It's a Nokia . . . Game Boy Advance?”, Jorgen Sundgot, InfoSyncWorld, Oct. 11, 2001 <http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/986.html>.
  • “iTAP” Predictive Text Input Technology Technical Paper Lexicus, A Division of Motorola, Version 1.0, Jun. 26, 2002, pp. 1-11. Retreived from the Internet on Aug. 28, 2006 at URL: http://www.toptrend.com.tw/library/product%20line/Lexicus/iTAP/iTAP%20Technical%20Paper%20for%20ESC.pdf.
  • “New Nokia 5510 is Entertainment Phone”, Ana Leticia Sigvartsen, InfoSatellite.com, Oct. 11, 2001, <http://www.infosatellite.com/news/2001/10/a111001nokia—5510.htm>.
  • “Nokia 5510 User's Guide”, Copyright 2001-2002, Selected Pages. Available at: <http://nds1.nokia.com/phones/files/guides/5510—usersguide—en.pdf>.
  • <www.francemobiles.com/telmob/pack/itineris/pa086271.php?from=aol>.
  • Examination Report dated Apr. 11, 2008 from Australian Application No. 2002331407.
  • First Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2006 for Chinese Patent Application No. 02825059.1.
  • Supplemental Search Report dated Dec. 1, 2006 for European Patent Application No. 02766922.5.
  • Examination Report dated Nov. 15, 2010 for European Patent Application No. 02766922.5.
  • Examination Report dated Feb. 17, 2010 for European Patent Application No. 02766922.5.
  • Examination Report dated Oct. 17, 2007 for European Patent Application No. 02766922.5.
  • Examination Report dated May 22, 2007 for European Patent Application No. 02766922.5.
  • Supplemental Search Report dated Feb. 19, 2007 for European Patent Application No. 02766922.5.
  • Supplemental Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2011 for European Patent Application No. 08714345.
  • First Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2010 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200710153468.4.
  • Examination Report dated Jun. 22, 2011 for Australian Patent Application No. 2010200095.
  • Examination Report dated Sep. 29, 2009 for New Zealand Patent Application No. 566172.
  • Examination Report dated Apr. 12, 2011 for New Zealand Patent Application No. 566172.
  • First Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 2006800364961.
  • Examination Report dated Feb. 10, 2010 for Singapore Patent Application No. 200801128-0.
  • Examination Report dated Oct. 29, 2010 for Australian Patent Application No. 2006281970.
  • “Optimizing predictive text entry for short message service on mobile phones” by How et al. School of Computing, National University of Singapore, 2005. Retrieved from the Internet: http://en.scientificcommons.org/43594032.
  • “An Efficient Text Input Method for Pen-based Computers” by Toshiyuki Masui, Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'98), Apr. 1998. Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.pitecan.com/papers/CHI98/CHI98.pdf.
  • Various Website Screanshots for WayBackMachine for n-e-ware.com and related websites; Various Dates.
  • “The Use of Syntax in Word Completion Utilities” by Afsaneh Fazly, Graduate Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 2002, Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Fazly-thesis.pdf.
  • KeyStick Text Entry System for Series 60 Mobile Phones Version 2.8.0; 2003.
  • International Search Report dated Jan. 15, 2002 from International Patent Application No. PCT/AU2002/001467.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2011 for Japanese Application No. 2008-525341 with English Translation.
  • Communication from European Patent Office dated Apr. 16, 2013 for EP 06774802.
  • Ali K., Van Stam, W., TiVo: Making Show Recommendations using a Disturbed Collaborative Filtering Architecture, pp. 394-401, KDD 2004, Seattle, WA, 2004.
Patent History
Patent number: 9836489
Type: Grant
Filed: Aug 9, 2016
Date of Patent: Dec 5, 2017
Patent Publication Number: 20170031544
Assignee: Kannuu Pty Ltd (Brisbane, Queensland)
Inventor: Kevin Dinn (Mt. Kuring-gai)
Primary Examiner: Son T Hoang
Application Number: 15/232,511
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Specific To Individual User Or Household (725/34)
International Classification: G06F 17/30 (20060101); G06F 3/023 (20060101); G06F 3/0489 (20130101); H04M 1/2745 (20060101); G06F 3/0338 (20130101); G06F 3/0482 (20130101); G06F 3/0484 (20130101);