Spinal implant with expandable fixation
A spinal implant which is configured to be deployed between adjacent vertebral bodies. The implant has at least one fixation element with a retracted configuration to facilitate deployment of the implant and an extended configuration so as to engage a surface of an adjacent vertebral body and secure the implant between two vertebral bodies. Preferably, the implant is expandable and has a minimal dimension in its unexpanded state that is smaller than the dimensions of the neuroforamen through which it must pass to be deployed within the intervertebral space. Once within the space between vertebral bodies, the implant can be expanded so as to engage the endplates of the adjacent vertebrae to effectively distract the anterior disc space, stabilize the motion segments and eliminate pathologic spine motion. Angular deformities can be corrected, and natural curvatures restored and maintained.
Latest Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Patents:
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/072,044, filed on Feb. 22, 2008, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to devices and methods for stabilizing the vertebral motion segment. More specifically, the field of the invention relates to an expandable spinal implant with fixation elements to fix the implant within an intervertebral space while providing controlled spinal correction in three dimensions for improved spinal intervertebral body distraction and fusion.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A conventional spine cage or implant is characterized by a kidney bean shaped body which is typically inserted in tandem posteriorly through the neuroforamen of the distracted spine after a trial implant creates a pathway. Existing devices for interbody stabilization have important and significant limitations, including inability to expand and distract the endplates while fixing the device to prevent relative movement between the device and an adjacent vertebral body. Current devices for interbody stabilization include static spacers composed of titanium, PEEK, and high performance thermoplastic polymer produced by VICTREX, (Victrex USA Inc, 3A Caledon Court; Greenville, S.C. 29615), carbon fiber, or resorbable polymers. Moreover, current interbody spacers do not maintain interbody lordosis and can contribute to the formation of a straight or even kyphotic segment and the clinical problem of “flatback syndrome.” Separation of vertebral endplates increases space available for the neural elements, specifically the neural foramen. Existing static cages do not reliably improve space for the neural elements. Therefore, what is needed is a spinal implant that will provide space for the neural elements posteriorly between the vertebral bodies, or at least maintain the natural bone contours to avoid neuropraxia (nerve stretch) or encroachment.
Conventional devices for intervertebral body stabilization includes poor interface between bone and the biomaterial of the device. Conventional static interbody spacers form a weak interface between bone and biomaterial. Although the surface of such implants is typically provided with a series of ridges or coated with hydroxyapetite, the ridges may be in parallel with applied horizontal vectors or side-to-side motion. That is, the ridges or coatings on the implant offer little resistance to movement applied to either side the endplates. Thus, nonunion is common in allograft, titanium and polymer spacers, due to motion between the implant and host bone.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is generally directed to a spinal implant for insertion between superior and inferior vertebral end plates after partial or total removal of a spinal disc. The spinal implant embodying features of the invention is easily installed and is capable of holding the vertebral or joint sections with increased pullout strength to minimize the chance of implant fixation loss during the period when the implant is becoming incorporated into the arthrodesis bone block.
More specifically, the invention is particularly directed to a spinal implant which has one or more extendable fixation elements that engage or penetrate vertebral end plates and prevent movement between the implant and the vertebral end plates after implantation. The one or more expandable fixation elements have a contracted configuration within the implant so as to not interfere with the insertion of the implant between vertebral bodies and have an extended configuration with a distal tip extending beyond the surface of the implant to engage the vertebral end plates after implantation and fix the position of the implant with respect to the adjacent vertebral body. The fixation element may be extended in a variety of ways such as with fluid pressure, e.g. hydraulic fluid, by mechanical force, such as a threaded connection with a rotating driving member or other suitable means. Fluidic displacement is preferred. The distal tip of the fixation element should be sharp enough to penetrate into the vertebral end plate.
Preferably, the spinal implant embodying features of the invention is an expandable spinal implant such as the selectively expanding spine cage described in copending application Ser. No. 11/535,432, filed on Sep. 26, 2006 and Ser. No. 11/692,800, filed on Mar. 28, 2007, which provides restoration of disc height between adjacent vertebrae and can provide corrective spinal alignment in a plurality of dimensions. Preferably, the implant has an interior cavity for receiving osteoconductive material to promote the formation of new bone in the intervertebral space subsequent to implanting.
A spinal implant having features of the invention has a base including a first pressure applying member such as an end plate with a first bone engaging surface, at least one extendable member cooperating with the base and a second upper pressure applying member with a second bone engaging surface coupled to the at least one extendable member. The one or more extendable fixation elements are configured to extend through passageways provided in the second upper pressure applying member and beyond the bone engaging surface thereof to penetrate into the adjacent vertebral end plate and fix the implant with respect the vertebral body. Preferably, the fixation elements are slidably disposed within recesses within the extendable members.
The selectively expanding spine cage (SEC) or spinal implant embodying features of the invention is particularly suitable for posterior insertion between superior and inferior vertebral end plates as described in the aforementioned copending application Ser. Nos. 11/535,432 and 11/692,800. The SEC has an unexpanded configuration which allows easy deployment and is typically about 0.8 to about 1 cm in maximum short transverse dimension so as to enable minimal invasive insertion posteriorly between vertebral pedicles through a working space of approximately 1 cm in diameter. The extended fixation element extends beyond the tissue engaging surface of the second pressure applying member by at least 0.1 cm, preferably at least 0.25 cm to ensure proper engagement or contact with the end plate of the vertebral body and preferably penetration thereof.
In one preferred embodiment, at least one and preferably all of the extendable members of the SEC have an extendable fixation element disposed within a recess in the extendable member. In this embodiment, the implant is preferably fluid activated so the extendable members expand the SEC after implantation and be properly positioned between the adjacent vertebral bodies. Additionally, the fixation member is also extended by fluid pressure with or after expansion of the SEC. Preferably, the fluid expansion is by hydraulic fluid from a master cylinder or a syringe located remotely from the patient to enable controlled spinal correction in multiple dimensions and fixation of the SEC in a proper position. Individual cylinders or syringes may also be employed. Advantageously, the hydraulic fluid is a time-controlled curable polymer, such as methylmethacrylate, which has a viscosity and curing time that can be adjusted by the formulation of an appropriate added catalyst, as is well known. When the polymer cures, it hardens and locks the expanded expandable members and the expanded fixation element in position to provide the desired amount of anterior/posterior, medial/lateral, superior/inferior spinal correction immovably in place. Mechanical locking of the expandable members and/or the fixation elements may also be employed.
Once inserted between vertebral endplates, the implant advantageously can be expanded with a minimum of force exerted remotely through the hydraulic control lines. The expansion of the implant advantageously is about 20% to about 100% greater than the unexpanded height thereof, typically about 60%. Typical expansion is about 13 mm in the case of a 8 mm implant and about 16 mm in the case of a 10 mm implant.
Since the vertebral end plates are held together at one (the anterior) end by a ligament much like a clamshell, as the implant expands against the vertebral end plates, the amount of vertical expansion can be adjusted to create the desired anterior/posterior correction angle.
Left and right lateral correction of the spine is achieved by differential vertical expansion of the two or more extendable members of the implant. Each extendable member is preferably independently controlled by a master cylinder or syringe located ex vivo (away from the patient) and communicating hydraulically with the slave cylinders for moving the pistons and top plate vertically and laterally for correcting spinal deformities anteriorly or posteriorly, medial or lateral, thus available to provide spinal correction in three dimensions.
A minimally invasive downsized insertion tool both inserts the unexpanded SEC posteriorly and houses the hydraulic lines communicating between the master cylinder and the slave cylinder. The insertion tool also houses a line for communicating the liquid or slurry bone graft material to the slave cylinder and into the intervertebral space for subsequent fusion. Advantageously, the hydraulic lines are small size tubing to allow for high hydraulic pressure without danger of the lines bursting. The sizes of the slave cylinders and pistons can be varied to increase the mechanical advantage.
Due to the mechanical advantage provided by the hydraulic system, the SEC has minimized size and diameter in its unexpanded state that is smaller than the diameter of a prepared neuroforamen. The SEC thus can be inserted posteriorly and is engaged between the endplates of the adjacent vertebra to effectively distract the intervertebral area, restore space for neural elements, stabilize the motion segment and eliminate pathologic segmental motion. The SEC enhances spine arthrodesis by creating a rigid spine segment.
The SEC provides a significant advantage by enabling a comparatively large quantity of gone growth conductive or inductive agents to be contained within its interior communicating directly to adjacent bone. Importantly, this results in fixation forces greater than adjacent bone and soft tissue failure forces.
The hydraulic control system provides a minimally invasive procedure by enabling the surgeon to apply a controlling force away from the patient's body to expand and adjust the spinal implant in three dimensions. Preferably, the expansion is infinitely adjustable to provide a variety of height and lateral angles, and is not limited to incremental positions. The implant can be used to promote fusion, and/or to correct deformities such as scoliosis, kyphosis, and spondylolisthesis.
The clinical goals of the SEC and the method for its insertion provide a minimally invasive risk of trauma to nerve roots, reduce pain, improve function, and permit early mobilization of the patient after fusion surgery. The fixation elements maintain the implant in a desired position until healing (fusion or arthrodesis) occurs. At this point, the implant is incorporated inside bone and its role becomes quiescent. The present SEC provides more internal and external graft bone space exposure, easier and safer directed insertion, less risk of insertional damage to nerve roots and other tissue, and thus provide substantially improved immediate and long term results.
Thus, a key feature of the invention is that an essentially incompressible implant can be inserted posteriorly between vertebral pedicles in only a 1 cm working space. The implant then can be expanded to about 100% to about 200%, typically about 160%, of its original insertion size to provide a closely controlled full range of spinal correction in three dimensions. The one or more expandable fixation elements or spikes ensure that the implant remains in place after deployment. These and other advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying exemplary drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
As shown in these figures, the SEC 10 has a base 12 with a pressure applying end member or plate 13 having a surface 14 for engaging an end surface of an adjacent vertebral body. Extendable support members 15 and 16 cooperate with the base 12. A second end pressure applying member or plate 17 is coupled to the extendable support members 15 and 16 so that the plate 17 moves with the extension of extendable support members 15 and 16. The plate 17 may be fixed to only one of the extendable support member but also engageable with the other extendable support member. Each extendable support member may have a separate end plate fixed 17 thereto, as shown in
Additional details of the SEC such as the attachment of hydraulic lines and lines for transmission of a slurry or liquid bone graft material, device and hydraulic fluid delivery accessories and the like can be found in co-pending application Ser. No. 11/535,432 filed on Sep. 26, 2006 and Ser. No. 11,692,800, filed on Mar. 28, 2007, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Since vertebral end plates are held together at one end by a ligament much like a clamshell, expansion of the device against the end plates of adjacent vertebral bodies can be adjusted to create the desired anterior/posterior correction angle.
The hydraulic fluid used to expand the SEC 10 and to extend the spikes 18 and 19 may advantageously be a time-controlled curable polymer such as methylmethacrylate. The viscosity and curing time of such a polymer can be adjusted by the formulation with an appropriate added catalyst as is well known. Such catalysts are available from LOCTITE Corp., 1001 Trout Brook Crossing, Rocky Hill, Conn. 06067. When the polymer cures, it hardens and locks the extendable members 15 and 16 and the spikes 18 and 19 in a desired position to provide the desired amount of spinal correction determined by the physician. Other means may be employed to lock the extendable members and the spikes in a desired position. For example, spring actuated locking fingers may be provided in the bore of one or more of the pistons and one or more of the bores of the spikes which extend outwardly when the piston or spike pass their respective locations upon extension thereof.
It will be appreciated that the SEC, including its various components should be formed of biocompatible, substantially incompressible material such as titanium, and preferably type 6-4 titanium alloy or other suitable materials which will allow for long term deployment within a patient.
The extension of extendable members 15 and 16 are preferably individually controlled so that the physician is able to provide a controlled angle of the SEC corrective surface. While only two extendable members are described herein, the SEC 10 may be provided with three or more individually extendable members so that the physician can exercise three-dimensional control of the SEC extension.
The SEC 10 embodying features of the invention provides advantages that include correction of coronal plane deformity; introduction of interbody lordosis, early stabilization of the interbody space with rigidity that is greater than present spacer devices and the ability to fix the SEC within the intervertebral space. This early stability may improve post-operative pain, preclude the need for posterior implants including pedicle screws, and improve the rate of successful arthrodesis. Importantly, the SEC provides improvement of space available for the neural elements while improving lordosis. As infused osteoinductive/osteoconductive bone graft materials heal, the patient becomes well and the implant becomes inert and quiescent, embedded in bone, and no longer needed.
While the invention has been described in connection with what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments and alternatives as set forth above, but on the contrary is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the following claims.
For example, the SEC 10 described herein is expanded by hydraulic fluid. Other expansion means may be employed. For example, a screw mechanism may be employed to expand the SEC and to extend one or more of the spikes into engagement with adjacent vertebral surfaces. Additionally, the spikes which help fix the SEC within the vertebral space are described herein as being extended with the extendable support members. However, the spikes may be slidably disposed in separate bores and independent expansion of the extendable support members.
Further, the SEC can be provided with load or pressure sensors that register differential pressure and pressure intensity exerted on the engaging surfaces of the SEC by the patient's vertebrae end plates to generate corrective signals, for example by control, that are used e.g. by the surgeon or by a computer controlled mechanism to realign the patient's spine. The invention may further include a system that makes these adjustments, responsive to sensor signals, in real time and on a continual basis, such that the shapes of the implant changes to realign the patient's spine or mechanism. Preferably, such system is contemplated for use in setting the positions of the pistons during installation of the implant.
Furthermore, the SEC needs not be rigidly locked into position but may be provided with yieldable material to provide some movement of the end surfaces of the SEC to accommodate spinal movement.
While particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, it will be apparent that various modifications and improvements can be made to the invention. Additional details of the spinal implant devices may be found in the patents and applications referenced herein. To the extent not otherwise disclosed herein, materials and structure may be of conventional design.
Moreover, individual features of embodiments of the invention may be shown in some drawings and not in others, but those skilled in the art will recognize that individual features of one embodiment of the invention can be combined with any or all the features of another embodiment. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific embodiments illustrated. It is therefore intended that this invention be defined by the scope of the appended claims as broadly as the prior art will permit.
Terms such as “element”, “member”, “component”, “device”, “means”, “portion”, “section”, “steps” and words of similar import when used herein shall not be construed as invoking the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112(6) unless the followingclaims expressly use the terms “means for” or “step for” followed by a particular function without reference to a specific structure or a specific action. All patents and all patent applications referred to above are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
1. A spinal implant for placement in a space between opposed first and second vertebral bodies, the implant comprising:
- a first end plate having a first surface for engaging a first vertebral body;
- at least two separate second end plates having respective second surfaces for engaging a second vertebral body, such that the at least two separate second end plates are independently movable with respect to the first end plate, with each of the at least two separate second end plates being adapted to independently change angles with respect to the first end plate; and
- at least two extendable fixation elements, each having a distal tip, a contracted configuration within the implant to facilitate deployment of the implant between the first and second vertebral bodies, and an extended configuration to extend each distal tip beyond one of the at least two second surfaces to engage the second vertebral body and to fix the implant within the space between the first and second vertebral bodies;
- wherein each of the at least two separate second end plates are adapted to independently change angles with respect to the first end plate about a respective pivot point that is fixed with respect to the respective second end plate, such that each of the second end plates are constrained to pivot about the respective pivot point.
2. The implant of claim 1, wherein the at least two extendable fixation elements are independently extendable.
3. The implant of claim 2, wherein the at least two extendable fixation elements are laterally spaced apart from one another to define a central cavity in at least the contracted configuration between the at least two extendable fixation elements, the first surface, and the at least two second surfaces, the cavity configured to receive bone graft material for infusion from the cavity into the space between the vertebral bodies.
4. The implant of claim 1, wherein the first end plate is part of a base member and the at least two separate second end plates comprise at least two pressure applying members, wherein at least two support members cooperate with the base and are each coupled to one of the at least two pressure applying members.
5. The implant of claim 4, wherein the at least two extendable fixation elements and the at least two support members are adapted to be extended by fluid.
6. The implant of claim 4, wherein each of the at least two pressure applying members has at least one passageway through which the distal tip of each extendable fixation element extends to engage the second vertebral body.
7. The implant of claim 6, wherein each extendable fixation element is extendable independent of one of the at least two support members.
8. The implant of claim 6, wherein each extendable fixation element is slidably disposed within a bore of an extendable member.
9. The implant of claim 6, wherein:
- the base member defines at least two cylinders configured to sealingly receive the at least two support members;
- the central cavity is defined between the at least two cylinders, open to the space between the vertebral bodies; and
- the at least two support members each define an internal cylinder configured to sealingly receive the extendable fixation elements.
10. The implant of claim 9, wherein at least two of the at least two support members are adapted to be independently extended.
11. The implant of claim 9, wherein the at least two support members are coupled to the respective pressure applying members with ball shaped connections.
12. A spinal implant for placement in an intervertebral space between opposed vertebral bodies, comprising:
- a base member defining first and second spaced apart cylinders;
- first and second extendable members disposed, respectively, in the first and second cylinders;
- first and second extendable fixation elements disposed, respectively, in the first and second extendable members; and
- two separate pressure applying plates cooperating with the respective first and second extendable members, the two separate pressure applying plates being independently movable with respect to the base member, with each of the two separate pressure applying plates being adapted to independently change angles with respect to the base member, the two separate pressure applying plates being disposed opposite the base member to define a central cavity configured to receive bone graft material between the first and second cylinders and between the base member and the pressure applying plates, the central cavity being open at a first end and a second end to the intervertebral space for communication therewith, the central cavity having an axis between the first end and the second end transverse to the direction of extension of the extendable members;
- wherein each of the two separate pressure applying plates are adapted to independently change angles with respect to the base member about a respective pivot point that is fixed with respect to the respective pressure applying plate, such that each of the pressure applying plates are constrained to pivot about the respective pivot point.
13. The spinal implant of claim 12, wherein:
- the base member has an outer surface opposite the central cavity configured for engaging a surface of a vertebral body; and
- the pressure applying plates have respective outer surfaces opposite the central cavity configured for engaging a surface of a vertebral body.
14. The spinal implant of claim 13, wherein the extendable members and extendable fixation elements are extendable by fluid pressure exerted within the cylinders.
15. The spinal implant of claim 12, wherein the central cavity is configured for infusion of bone graft material into an intervertebral space.
16. A spinal implant for placement in a space between opposed first and second vertebral bodies, the implant comprising:
- a first end plate having a first surface for engaging a first vertebral body;
- a second end plate having a second surface for engaging a second vertebral body;
- a third end plate having a third surface for engaging the second vertebral body;
- a first extendable support member coupled to the first end plate and the second end plate, the first extendable support member being extendable so as to move the second end plate away from the first end plate; and
- a second extendable support member coupled to the first end plate and the third end plate, the second extendable support member being extendable so as to move the third end plate away from the first end plate;
- wherein the first and second extendable support members are individually extendable so as to individually move the respective second and third end plates with respect to the first end plate;
- wherein the first and second extendable support members are pivotably coupled to the respective second and third end plates such that the second and third end plates can independently change angles with respect to the first end plate; and
- wherein the first extendable support member is pivotably coupled to the second end plate at a first pivot point that is fixed with respect to the second end plate, such that the second end plate is constrained to pivot about the first pivot point, and wherein the second extendable support member is pivotably coupled to the third end plate at a second pivot point that is fixed with respect to the third end plate, such that the third end plate is constrained to pivot about the second pivot point.
17. The implant of claim 16, wherein the first and second extendable support members are laterally spaced apart from one another to define a central cavity therebetween, the cavity configured to receive bone graft material for infusion from the central cavity into an intervertebral space between the first and second vertebral bodies.
18. The implant of claim 16, wherein the first and second extendable support members are extendable by a pressurized fluid.
19. The implant of claim 16, further comprising:
- a first extendable fixation element having a distal tip; and
- a second extendable fixation element having a distal tip;
- wherein the first and second extendable fixation elements each have a contracted configuration, in which the respective extendable fixation element is disposed within the implant, and an extended configuration, in which the distal tip of the respective extendable fixation element extends beyond the respective second and third surface to engage the second vertebral body.
20. The implant of claim 19, wherein the first and second extendable fixation elements are extendable by a pressurized fluid.
21. The implant of claim 20, wherein the first and second extendable support members are extendable by the same pressurized fluid as the first and second extendable fixation elements.
22. The implant of claim 19, wherein the first extendable fixation element is slidably disposed within a first bore of the first extendable support member, and wherein the second extendable fixation element is slidably disposed within a second bore of the second extendable support member.
U.S. Patent Documents
|4932975||June 12, 1990||Main et al.|
|4969888||November 13, 1990||Scholten et al.|
|5236460||August 17, 1993||Barber|
|5653763||August 5, 1997||Errico et al.|
|5665122||September 9, 1997||Kambin|
|5723013||March 3, 1998||Jeanson et al.|
|5827328||October 27, 1998||Buttermann|
|5865848||February 2, 1999||Baker|
|5916267||June 29, 1999||Tienboon|
|5980522||November 9, 1999||Koros et al.|
|5989290||November 23, 1999||Biedermann et al.|
|6039761||March 21, 2000||Li et al.|
|6102950||August 15, 2000||Vaccaro|
|6127597||October 3, 2000||Beyar et al.|
|6176881||January 23, 2001||Schar et al.|
|6193756||February 27, 2001||Studer et al.|
|6214012||April 10, 2001||Karpman et al.|
|6296665||October 2, 2001||Strnad et al.|
|6371989||April 16, 2002||Chauvin et al.|
|6375682||April 23, 2002||Fleischmann et al.|
|6375683||April 23, 2002||Crozet et al.|
|6395032||May 28, 2002||Gauchet|
|6454806||September 24, 2002||Cohen|
|6527803||March 4, 2003||Crozet et al.|
|6562074||May 13, 2003||Gerbec et al.|
|6582467||June 24, 2003||Teitelbaum et al.|
|6585699||July 1, 2003||Ljunggreen et al.|
|6692495||February 17, 2004||Zacouto|
|6719796||April 13, 2004||Cohen et al.|
|6723126||April 20, 2004||Berry|
|6730088||May 4, 2004||Yeh|
|6764491||July 20, 2004||Frey et al.|
|6830570||December 14, 2004||Frey et al.|
|6835207||December 28, 2004||Zacouto et al.|
|6866682||March 15, 2005||An et al.|
|6875235||April 5, 2005||Ferree|
|6953477||October 11, 2005||Berry|
|6960232||November 1, 2005||Lyons et al.|
|6981989||January 3, 2006||Fleischmann et al.|
|7001431||February 21, 2006||Bao et al.|
|7018415||March 28, 2006||McKay|
|7018416||March 28, 2006||Hanson et al.|
|7060037||June 13, 2006||Lussier et al.|
|7060073||June 13, 2006||Frey et al.|
|7066958||June 27, 2006||Ferree|
|7094257||August 22, 2006||Mujwid et al.|
|7166110||January 23, 2007||Yundt|
|7204853||April 17, 2007||Gordon et al.|
|7214243||May 8, 2007||Taylor|
|7217293||May 15, 2007||Branch, Jr.|
|7282063||October 16, 2007||Cohen et al.|
|7291150||November 6, 2007||Graf|
|7291158||November 6, 2007||Crow et al.|
|7316686||January 8, 2008||Dorchak et al.|
|7316714||January 8, 2008||Gordon et al.|
|7351261||April 1, 2008||Casey|
|7407513||August 5, 2008||Alleyne et al.|
|7419505||September 2, 2008||Fleischmann et al.|
|7452359||November 18, 2008||Michelson|
|7470273||December 30, 2008||Dougherty-Shah|
|7481812||January 27, 2009||Frey et al.|
|7485145||February 3, 2009||Purcell|
|7507241||March 24, 2009||Levy et al.|
|7520900||April 21, 2009||Trieu|
|7563284||July 21, 2009||Coppes et al.|
|7563286||July 21, 2009||Gerber et al.|
|7621956||November 24, 2009||Paul et al.|
|7628815||December 8, 2009||Baumgartner et al.|
|7670359||March 2, 2010||Yundt|
|7708779||May 4, 2010||Edie et al.|
|7722674||May 25, 2010||Grotz|
|7731752||June 8, 2010||Edie et al.|
|7731753||June 8, 2010||Reo et al.|
|7771480||August 10, 2010||Navarro et al.|
|7794501||September 14, 2010||Edie et al.|
|7806935||October 5, 2010||Navarro et al.|
|7819921||October 26, 2010||Grotz|
|7824444||November 2, 2010||Biscup et al.|
|7824445||November 2, 2010||Biro et al.|
|7854766||December 21, 2010||Moskowitz et al.|
|7862618||January 4, 2011||White et al.|
|7883543||February 8, 2011||Sweeney|
|7935124||May 3, 2011||Frey et al.|
|7967863||June 28, 2011||Frey et al.|
|7967867||June 28, 2011||Barreiro et al.|
|7985231||July 26, 2011||Sankaran|
|7985256||July 26, 2011||Grotz et al.|
|8021395||September 20, 2011||Ben-Mokhtar et al.|
|8025680||September 27, 2011||Hayes et al.|
|8057549||November 15, 2011||Butterman et al.|
|8062368||November 22, 2011||Heinz et al.|
|8062373||November 22, 2011||Fabian, Jr.|
|8070813||December 6, 2011||Grotz et al.|
|8105382||January 31, 2012||Olmos et al.|
|8153785||April 10, 2012||Khire et al.|
|8187331||May 29, 2012||Strohkirch, Jr. et al.|
|8192495||June 5, 2012||Simpson et al.|
|8267939||September 18, 2012||Cipoletti et al.|
|8273124||September 25, 2012||Renganath et al.|
|8303663||November 6, 2012||Jimenez et al.|
|8353961||January 15, 2013||McClintock et al.|
|8366777||February 5, 2013||Matthis et al.|
|8394143||March 12, 2013||Grotz et al.|
|8435296||May 7, 2013||Kadaba et al.|
|8454695||June 4, 2013||Grotz et al.|
|8696751||April 15, 2014||Ashley et al.|
|20010056302||December 27, 2001||Boyer et al.|
|20020128716||September 12, 2002||Cohen et al.|
|20020138146||September 26, 2002||Jackson|
|20020151976||October 17, 2002||Foley et al.|
|20030114899||June 19, 2003||Woods et al.|
|20040030346||February 12, 2004||Frey et al.|
|20040088054||May 6, 2004||Berry|
|20040097928||May 20, 2004||Zdeblick et al.|
|20040133273||July 8, 2004||Cox|
|20040153065||August 5, 2004||Lim|
|20040186576||September 23, 2004||Biscup et al.|
|20050033437||February 10, 2005||Bao et al.|
|20050043800||February 24, 2005||Paul et al.|
|20050049590||March 3, 2005||Alleyne|
|20050085910||April 21, 2005||Sweeney|
|20050107881||May 19, 2005||Alleyne et al.|
|20050113842||May 26, 2005||Bertagnoli et al.|
|20050197702||September 8, 2005||Coppes et al.|
|20050216084||September 29, 2005||Fleischmann et al.|
|20050229433||October 20, 2005||Cachia|
|20050251260||November 10, 2005||Gerber et al.|
|20050273169||December 8, 2005||Purcell|
|20050273170||December 8, 2005||Navarro et al.|
|20050273171||December 8, 2005||Gordon et al.|
|20060036259||February 16, 2006||Carl et al.|
|20060085073||April 20, 2006||Raiszadeh|
|20060089719||April 27, 2006||Trieu|
|20060106416||May 18, 2006||Raymond et al.|
|20060116767||June 1, 2006||Magerl et al.|
|20060142860||June 29, 2006||Navarro et al.|
|20060142861||June 29, 2006||Murray|
|20060149377||July 6, 2006||Navarro et al.|
|20060167547||July 27, 2006||Suddaby|
|20060200244||September 7, 2006||Assaker|
|20060235426||October 19, 2006||Lim et al.|
|20060235535||October 19, 2006||Ferree et al.|
|20060264968||November 23, 2006||Frey et al.|
|20070050030||March 1, 2007||Kim|
|20070050033||March 1, 2007||Reo et al.|
|20070073395||March 29, 2007||Baumgartner et al.|
|20070093901||April 26, 2007||Grotz et al.|
|20070093903||April 26, 2007||Cheng|
|20070123987||May 31, 2007||Bernstein|
|20070179611||August 2, 2007||Dipoto et al.|
|20070233254||October 4, 2007||Grotz et al.|
|20070255409||November 1, 2007||Dickson et al.|
|20070255413||November 1, 2007||Edie et al.|
|20070255415||November 1, 2007||Edie et al.|
|20070270961||November 22, 2007||Ferguson|
|20070270964||November 22, 2007||Strohkirch et al.|
|20070288092||December 13, 2007||Bambakidis|
|20080021555||January 24, 2008||White et al.|
|20080021556||January 24, 2008||Edie|
|20080058930||March 6, 2008||Edie et al.|
|20080058931||March 6, 2008||White et al.|
|20080065082||March 13, 2008||Chang et al.|
|20080065220||March 13, 2008||Alleyne et al.|
|20080065221||March 13, 2008||Alleyne et al.|
|20080077150||March 27, 2008||Nguyen|
|20080086276||April 10, 2008||Naka et al.|
|20080097441||April 24, 2008||Hayes et al.|
|20080103601||May 1, 2008||Biro et al.|
|20080114467||May 15, 2008||Capote et al.|
|20080140207||June 12, 2008||Olmos et al.|
|20080147193||June 19, 2008||Matthis et al.|
|20080147194||June 19, 2008||Grotz et al.|
|20080161933||July 3, 2008||Grotz et al.|
|20080177387||July 24, 2008||Parimore et al.|
|20080215153||September 4, 2008||Butterman et al.|
|20080281424||November 13, 2008||Parry et al.|
|20080288073||November 20, 2008||Renganath et al.|
|20080300598||December 4, 2008||Barreiro et al.|
|20090005819||January 1, 2009||Ben-Mokhtar et al.|
|20090005874||January 1, 2009||Fleischmann et al.|
|20090018661||January 15, 2009||Kim et al.|
|20090043312||February 12, 2009||Koulisis et al.|
|20090048676||February 19, 2009||Fabian, Jr.|
|20090105836||April 23, 2009||Frey et al.|
|20090171389||July 2, 2009||Sankaran|
|20090204215||August 13, 2009||McClintock et al.|
|20090216331||August 27, 2009||Grotz et al.|
|20090222100||September 3, 2009||Cipoletti et al.|
|20090270987||October 29, 2009||Heinz et al.|
|20100016970||January 21, 2010||Kapitan et al.|
|20100057204||March 4, 2010||Kadaba et al.|
|20100145455||June 10, 2010||Simpson et al.|
|20100145456||June 10, 2010||Simpson et al.|
|20100249930||September 30, 2010||Myers|
|20110130835||June 2, 2011||Ashley et al.|
|20110137416||June 9, 2011||Myers|
|20110270398||November 3, 2011||Grotz et al.|
|20110288646||November 24, 2011||Moskowitz et al.|
|20120059469||March 8, 2012||Myers et al.|
|20120116518||May 10, 2012||Grotz et al.|
|20120130387||May 24, 2012||Simpson et al.|
|20120245695||September 27, 2012||Simpson et al.|
|20120283830||November 8, 2012||Myers|
|20130096677||April 18, 2013||Myers et al.|
|20130158669||June 20, 2013||Sungarian et al.|
|20130197642||August 1, 2013||Ernst|
|20130197647||August 1, 2013||Wolters et al.|
|20130197648||August 1, 2013||Boehm et al.|
|20130204368||August 8, 2013||Prevost|
|20130204374||August 8, 2013||Milella, Jr.|
|20130253650||September 26, 2013||Ashley et al.|
Foreign Patent Documents
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 22, 2011 in related International Application No. PCT/US2011/037929.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 11, 2010, in International Application No. PCT/US2010/031247 entitled “Insertion Handle for Implant.”
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 13, 2010, in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/067446 filed Dec. 10, 2009.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 6, 2009, in related International Application No. PCT/US2009/000974 filed Feb. 17, 2009.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 30, 2009, in related International Application No. PCT/US2008/003776 filed Mar. 21, 2008.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 10, 2008, in related International Application No. PCT/US2007/079474.
- International Search Report & Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2009/000974 dated Jun. 5, 2009.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dale dated Jun. 5, 2009 for related PCT/US2009/000974.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 6, 2009. In related International Application No. PCT/US2009/000974 filed Feb. 17, 2009.
- Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14159619 dated Jun. 12, 2014.
- Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11787340.6 dated Jun. 25, 2014.
- State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China Search Report for Chinese Application No. 201510859939.8 dated Oct. 24, 2017.
Filed: Jan 12, 2015
Date of Patent: Apr 3, 2018
Patent Publication Number: 20150134064
Assignee: Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (Mahwah, NJ)
Inventors: R. Thomas Grotz (Las Vegas, NV), Rudy A. Pretti (Auburn, CA)
Primary Examiner: Si Ming Ku
Application Number: 14/594,569
International Classification: A61F 2/44 (20060101); A61F 2/46 (20060101); A61F 2/28 (20060101); A61F 2/30 (20060101); A61F 2/48 (20060101);