Displaced porous electrode for frustrating TIR and returning light through exit pupil
A brightness enhancing structure for a reflective display incorporates a transparent sheet having an inward hemispherical surface, a backplane electrode, an apertured membrane between the hemispherical surface and the backplane electrode, and a light reflecting electrode on an outward side of the membrane. A voltage source connected between the electrodes is switchable to apply a first voltage to move the particles inwardly through the apertured membrane toward the backplane electrode, and a second voltage to move the particles outwardly through the apertured membrane toward the light reflecting electrode. Movement of the particles toward the light reflecting electrode frustrates total internal reflection of light rays at the hemispherical surface. Movement of the particles toward the backplane electrode permits total internal reflection of light rays at the hemispherical surface, and outward reflection from the light reflecting electrode toward the hemispherical surface of light rays which pass inwardly through the hemispherical surface.
Latest CLEARink Displays, Inc. Patents:
- STATIC SEMI-RETRO-REFLECTIVE DISPLAYS
- SHAPE DEPENDENT CONVEX PROTRUSIONS IN TIR-BASED IMAGE DISPLAYS
- METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DRIVING STATIC IMAGES AND VIDEO FOR TIR-BASED IMAGE DISPLAYS
- DRIVING METHODS FOR TIR-BASED IMAGE DISPLAYS
- Method and apparatus for a dry particle totally internally reflective image display
This application claims priority to the filing date of PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US14/30966 (filed Mar. 18, 2014), which claims priority to Provisional Patent Application 61/805,391 filed on Mar. 26, 2013.
TECHNICAL FIELDThis disclosure pertains to attainment of high brightness in wide viewing angle reflective image displays of the type described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,999,307; 6,064,784; 6,215,920; 6,865,011; 6,885,496; 6,891,658; 7,164,536; 7,286,280 and 8,040,591; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUNDAn electrophoresis medium 20 is maintained adjacent the portions of beads 14 which protrude inwardly from material 16 by containment of medium 20 within a reservoir 22 defined by lower sheet 24. An inert, low refractive index (i.e. less than about 1.35), low viscosity, electrically insulating liquid such as Fluorinert™ perfluorinated hydrocarbon liquid (η1˜1.27) available from 3M, St. Paul, Minn. is a suitable electrophoresis medium. Other liquids, or water can also be used as electrophoresis medium 20. A bead:liquid TIR interface is thus formed. Medium 20 contains a finely dispersed suspension of light scattering and/or absorptive particles 26 such as pigments, dyed or otherwise scattering/absorptive silica or latex particles, etc. Sheet 24's optical characteristics are relatively unimportant: sheet 24 need only form a reservoir for containment of electrophoresis medium 20 and particles 26, and serve as a support for backplane electrode 48.
As is well known, the TIR interface between two media having different refractive indices is characterized by a critical angle θc. Light rays incident upon the interface at angles less than θc are transmitted through the interface. Light rays incident upon the interface at angles greater than θc undergo TIR at the interface. A small critical angle is preferred at the TIR interface since this affords a large range of angles over which TIR may occur.
In the absence of electrophoretic activity, as is illustrated to the right of dashed line 28 in
A voltage can be applied across medium 20 via electrodes 46 and 48 which can for example be applied by vapour-deposition to the inwardly protruding surface portion of beads 14 and to the outward surface of sheet 24. Electrode 46 is transparent and substantially thin to minimize its interference with light rays at the bead:liquid TIR interface. Backplane electrode 48 need not be transparent. If electrophoresis medium 20 is activated by actuating voltage source 50 to apply a voltage between electrodes 46 and 48 as illustrated to the left of dashed line 28, suspended particles 26 are electrophoretically moved adjacent the surface of the monolayer of beads 18 into the region where the evanescent wave is relatively intense (i.e. within 0.25 micron of the inward surfaces of inwardly protruding beads 14, or closer). When electrophoretically moved as aforesaid, particles 26 scatter or absorb light, thus frustrating or modulating TIR by modifying the imaginary and possibly the real component of the effective refractive index at the bead:liquid TIR interface. This is illustrated by light rays 52 and 54 which are scattered and/or absorbed as they strike particles 26 inside the thin (˜0.5 μm) evanescent wave region at the bead:liquid TIR interface, as indicated at 56 and 58 respectively, thus achieving a “dark” appearance in each TIR-frustrated non-reflective absorption region or pixel. Particles 26 need only be moved outside the thin evanescent wave region, by suitably actuating voltage source 50, in order to restore the TIR capability of the bead:liquid TIR interface and convert each “dark” non-reflective absorption region or pixel to a “white” reflection region or pixel.
As described above, the net optical characteristics of outward sheet 12 can be controlled by controlling the voltage applied across medium 20 via electrodes 46 and 48. The electrodes can be segmented to control the electrophoretic activation of medium 20 across separate regions or pixels of sheet 12, thus forming an image.
Now consider incident light ray 68 which is perpendicularly incident (through material 16) on hemi-bead 60 at a distance
from hemi-bead 60's center C. Ray 68 encounters the inward surface of hemi-bead 60 at the critical angle θc (relative to radial axis 70), the minimum required angle for TIR to occur. Ray 68 is accordingly totally internally reflected, as ray 72, which again encounters the inward surface of hemi-bead 60 at the critical angle θc. Ray 72 is accordingly totally internally reflected, as ray 74, which also encounters the inward surface of hemi-bead 60 at the critical angle θc. Ray 74 is accordingly totally internally reflected, as ray 76, which passes perpendicularly through hemi-bead 60 into the embedded portion of bead 14 and into material 16. Ray 68 is thus reflected back as ray 76 in a direction approximately opposite that of incident ray 68.
All light rays which are incident on hemi-bead 60 at distances a≥ac from hemi-bead 60's center C are reflected back (but not exactly retro-reflected) toward the light source; which means that the reflection is enhanced when the light source is overhead and slightly behind the viewer, and that the reflected light has a diffuse characteristic giving it a white appearance, which is desirable in reflective display applications.
In
Display 10 has relatively high apparent brightness, comparable to that of paper, when the dominant source of illumination is behind the viewer, within a small angular range. This is illustrated in
where η1 is the refractive index of hemi-bead 60 and η3 is the refractive index of the medium adjacent the surface of hemi-bead 60 at which TIR occurs. Thus, if hemi-bead 60 is formed of a lower refractive index material such as polycarbonate (η1˜1.59) and if the adjacent medium is Fluorinert (η3˜1.27), a reflectance R of about 36% is attained, whereas if hemi-bead 60 is formed of a high refractive index nano-composite material (η1˜1.92) a reflectance R of about 56% is attained. When illumination source S (
As shown in
The reflective, white annular region 80 surrounding the non-reflective, dark circular region 82 presents a problem commonly referred to as the “dark pupil” problem which reduces the reflectance of the display. The display's performance is further reduced by transparent electrode 46, which may be formed by provision of a transparent conductive coating on hemi-beads 14. Such coatings typically absorb about 5% to 10% of the incident light. Since a light ray typically reflects several times, this can make it difficult to achieve efficient reflection. A further related problem is that it can be expensive and challenging to apply such a coating to a contoured hemispherical surface.
The dark pupil problem can be addressed by reflecting back toward hemi-beads 14 (i.e. “recycling”) light rays which pass through the non-reflective, dark circular region 82 of any of hemi-beads 14. An approach to solving this problem and enhancing the brightness of the display is to equip the display with a reflective component to reflect the light back through the pupil and towards the viewer.
An electrophoresis medium 108 is contained within the reservoir or cavity formed between the portions of beads 104 which protrude inwardly from material 102 and the lower or rear sheet 110. On the inward surface of the rear sheet 110 is an electrode layer 111. The medium 108 is an inert, low refractive index, low viscosity liquid such as a fluorinated hydrocarbon. Other liquids may also be used as electrophoresis medium 108. A bead:liquid TIR interface is thus formed. Medium 108 further contains a finely dispersed suspension of light absorbing, electrophoretically mobile particles 112.
In the absence of electrophoretic activity, as is illustrated to the left of dashed line 114 in
When a voltage is applied across medium 108, as is illustrated to the right of dashed line 114 in the prior art depicted in
As described in the preceding paragraphs, the porous reflective membrane's purpose is to reflect the light that passes through the dark pupil of the hemi-beads 116 back through the pupil region of the hemi-beads 116 and towards the viewer to enhance the brightness of the display as depicted in
The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related thereto are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive.
Throughout the following description specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding to persons skilled in the art. However, well known elements may not have been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the disclosure. Accordingly, the description and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative, rather than a restrictive, sense.
Display 200 depicted in
As depicted in
As mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, the metal:membrane structure is porous, enabling light absorbing electrophoretically mobile particles 214 to readily move through apertures 224 that penetrate both the membrane 216 and metal layer 220, as display 200's pixels are selectively switched between the light reflecting state (
In the light reflecting state shown in
Some incident light rays, such as representative light ray 234, are refracted through surface 204 and hemispherically-contoured surface 202 but do not undergo TIR at the bead:liquid TIR interface. Instead, ray 234 passes through hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and is reflected outwardly by metal layer 220 toward surface 202 and the viewer. The reflected ray is then refracted back through the pupil region of hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and sheet 204 and emerges as ray 236, again achieving a “white” appearance and improving the brightness of display 200.
Some other incident light rays, such as representative ray 238, are “lost” in the sense that they do not emerge outwardly from display 200. For example, ray 238 is refracted through surface 204 and hemispherically-contoured surface 202, but does not undergo TIR at the bead:liquid TIR interface and is not reflected by metal layer 220. Instead, ray 238 passes through one of membrane 204's apertures 224 and is absorbed, for example, at an inner wall portion of the aperture, as shown in
A switchable voltage (i.e. electric field) can be applied across electrophoresis medium 212 via electrodes 208 and 220 as indicated in
Another factor to consider is the appropriate relative spacing and alignment of transparent outward sheet 204, membrane:metal layer and rear electrode layer 208 can be achieved by providing loose or attached spacer beads and/or spacers (not shown) or a combination thereof on sheet 204, on rear electrode layer 208 or on the membrane:metal layer or combinations thereof. The spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and metal layer 220 atop membrane 216 is at least about 2 microns. More preferably the spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and metal layer 220 atop membrane 216 is about 4 microns to about 6 microns. The spacing between the rear backplane electrode 208 and the bottom of membrane 216 facing the backplane electrode 208 is at least about 10 microns. More preferably the spacing between the rear backplane electrode 208 and the bottom of membrane 216 facing the backplane electrode 208 is about 30 microns to about 50 microns. The spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and backplane electrode surface 208 that forms the reservoir cavity 210 is overall at least about 25 microns and more preferably about 30 microns to about 80 microns. In addition to the diameter of the apertures, da, and the spacing between the micron centers, dmc, display 200's switching speed is further dependent on the time required for particles 214 to move throughout the display as it is switched between the non-reflective and reflective states. Thus, the spacing distance between the various layers of the display is critical.
The reflectance of the surface is defined as the ratio of the luminance of the display to the luminance of a diffuse white reflectance standard (typically having a perfectly diffuse, or Lambertian, reflectance of 98%) measured using the same technique and under the same illumination conditions. The reflectance of a surface that exhibits semi-retro-reflective characteristics depends on the nature of the illumination conditions. If the surface is viewed in a perfectly diffuse illumination environment, there will be no apparent increase in reflectance caused by the semi-retro-reflective characteristics. In contrast, if the surface is viewed in an illumination environment that is not perfectly diffuse, a surface that exhibits semi-retro-reflective characteristics may have an apparent increase in reflectance. Such a lighting environment as shown in
In another embodiment where a higher switching speed, for example, is preferred, each hemisphere in hemispherically-contoured surface 202 may have a diameter of about 5 microns. Membrane:metal layer structure is substantially a flat sheet about 10 microns thick with the membrane being a thickness of about 10 microns while the metal layer a thickness of about 0.10 microns. The membrane:metal layer is perforated with about 12 micron diameter apertures 224 spaced on roughly 20 micron centers, such that the area fraction of apertures 224 on the membrane:metal layer structure is about 16%. The spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and the metal layer 220 on the membrane:metal layer is about 10 microns while the spacing between the bottom of the membrane layer 216 and top surface of the rear electrode layer 208 is about 30 microns making the total distance from the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and rear electrode surface about 50 microns. In this embodiment, approximately 84% of the light rays incident on metal layer 220 do not encounter one of apertures 224 and are reflected by metal layer 220. If the metal has a reflectance of approximately 80% as a result of approximately 20% absorption (such as is the case for a reflective layer of aluminum), then the membrane:metal layer will have an overall reflectance of approximately 67% (i.e. 80% reflection of 84% of the light rays incident on the membrane:metal layer. It should be noted that not only speed and brightness should be considered when factoring in the diameter, da, of the apertures 224 and the spacing of the apertures, dmc, but also the structural rigidity and stability of the resulting porous membrane:metal layer. The more porous a structure is the weaker it may become unless a thicker membrane is used or alternative and potentially more costly materials are to be used.
In the reflective state, shown in
In the display embodiments described herein, they may be used in applications such as in, but not limited to, electronic book readers, portable computers, tablet computers, wearables, cellular telephones, smart cards, signs, watches, shelf labels, flash drives and outdoor billboards or outdoor signs.
Embodiments described above illustrate but do not limit this disclosure. While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. Accordingly, the scope of this disclosure is defined only by the following claims.
Claims
1. A totally internally reflective display with a brightness enhancing structure to substantially absorb a reflecting light ray at an evanescent region, the display comprising:
- an optically transparent sheet having a surface further comprising a plurality of hemispherical protrusions on the inward side of the sheet;
- a backplane electrode;
- an apertured membrane between said optically transparent hemispherical surface and the backplane electrode;
- a light reflecting electrode on an outward side of the membrane;
- a single electrophoresis medium contained between said optically transparent hemispherical surface and the backplane electrode;
- a plurality of electrostatically charged light absorbing electrophoretically mobile particles suspended in the medium; and
- a voltage source to apply a voltage across the medium, between the light reflecting electrode and the backplane electrode to thereby modify the evanescent region to substantially absorb the reflecting light ray at the hemispherical surface.
2. The reflective display according to claim 1, wherein the voltage source is switchable to apply:
- a first voltage between the light reflecting electrode and the backplane electrode, to move substantially all of the particles inwardly through the apertured membrane toward the backplane electrode; and
- a second voltage between the light reflecting electrode and the backplane electrode, to move substantially all of the particles outwardly through the apertured membrane toward the light reflecting electrode.
3. The reflective display according to claim 1, wherein:
- movement of the particles outwardly through the apertured membrane toward the light reflecting electrode frustrates total internal reflection of light rays at the hemispherical surface;
- movement of the particles inwardly through the apertured membrane toward the backplane electrode permits:
- total internal reflection of light rays at the hemispherical surface; and
- outward reflection from the light reflecting electrode toward the hemispherical surface of light rays which pass inwardly through the hemispherical surface.
4. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the backplane electrode comprises a thin film transistor array.
5. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the apertured membrane comprises a polymer or glass.
6. The reflective display according to claim 5 wherein the thickness of the apertured membrane is at least about 5 microns.
7. The reflective display according to claim 6 wherein the thickness of the apertured membrane is about 10 microns to about 20 microns.
8. The reflective display according to claim 6 wherein the diameter of the apertures in the apertured membrane are at least about 5 microns.
9. The reflective display according to claim 8 wherein the diameter of the apertures in the apertured membrane are about 10 microns to about 15 microns.
10. The reflective display according to claim 8 wherein the apertures in the apertured membrane are organized in a substantially regular or irregular array.
11. The reflective display according to claim 10 wherein the center of the apertures in the apertured membrane are spaced at least about 10 microns.
12. The reflective display according to claim 11 wherein the center of the apertures in the apertured membrane are spaced about 25 microns to about 35 microns.
13. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the light reflective electrode comprises a metal.
14. The reflective display according to claim 13 wherein the thickness of the light reflective electrode is at least about 0.040 microns.
15. The reflective display according to claim 14 wherein the thickness of the light reflective electrode is about 0.10 microns to about 0.20 microns.
16. The reflective display according to claim 1 further comprising spacers or spacer beads.
17. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the gap between the transparent hemispherical surface and the light reflecting electrode is at least about 2 microns.
18. The reflective display according to claim 17 wherein the gap between the optically transparent hemispherical surface and the light reflecting electrode is about 4 microns to about 6 microns.
19. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the gap between membrane and the backplane electrode is at least about 10 microns.
20. The reflective display according to claim 19 wherein the gap between membrane and the backplane electrode is about 30 microns to about 50 microns.
21. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the electrophoretically mobile particles are comprised of an organic material or an inorganic material or a combination of an inorganic and organic material.
22. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the light reflecting electrode is positioned approximately at the focal plane of the hemispherical surface.
23. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the medium is comprised of a hydrocarbon or a fluorocarbon or a combination of a hydrocarbon and fluorocarbon.
24. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the optically transparent sheet having a surface comprising of a plurality of hemispherical protrusions may be formed by any one of embossing, etching, molding, self-assembly, printing, lithography or micro-replication.
25. The reflective display according to claim 1 wherein the display defines one of an electronic book reader, portable computer, tablet computer, wearable, cellular telephone, smart card, sign, watch, shelf label, flash drive, outdoor billboards or outdoor signs.
26. A Totally Internally Reflective (TIR) display with a brightness enhancing structure to substantially absorb a reflecting light ray at an evanescent region, comprising:
- an optically transparent sheet having an internal and external surface, the internal surface of the optically transparent sheet further comprising a plurality of hemispherical protrusions;
- a backplane electrode;
- a membrane positioned between the optically transparent hemispherical surface and the backplane electrode, the membrane having a plurality of openings wherein each opening is sized to provide passage to one or more electrophoretically mobile solid particle; and
- a first electrode positioned on an outward side of the membrane;
- wherein the first and the second electrode exclusively are configurable to form a magnetic flux in the display.
27. The TIR display of claim 26, wherein the display is further configured to receive a fluidic medium having the one or more electrophoretically mobile solid particle suspended therein.
28. The TIR display of claim 26, wherein the membrane further comprises a reflective surface positioned proximal to the plurality of hemispherical protrusions.
29. The TIR display of claim 26, wherein the optically transparent sheet is substantially charge-inert.
3792308 | February 1974 | Ota et al. |
3919031 | November 1975 | White |
4025674 | May 24, 1977 | Mizuochi |
4071430 | January 31, 1978 | Liebert |
4203106 | May 13, 1980 | Dalisa et al. |
4648956 | March 10, 1987 | Marhsall et al. |
4821092 | April 11, 1989 | Noguchi |
5019748 | May 28, 1991 | Appelberg |
5319491 | June 7, 1994 | Selbrede |
5359346 | October 25, 1994 | DiSanto et al. |
5396350 | March 7, 1995 | Beeson et al. |
5596671 | January 21, 1997 | Rockwell, III |
5751008 | May 12, 1998 | Jung et al. |
5871653 | February 16, 1999 | Ling |
5959777 | September 28, 1999 | Whitehead |
5999307 | December 7, 1999 | Whitehead et al. |
6064784 | May 16, 2000 | Whitehead et al. |
6215920 | April 10, 2001 | Whitehead et al. |
6304365 | October 16, 2001 | Whitehead et al. |
6376828 | April 23, 2002 | Comiskey |
6377383 | April 23, 2002 | Whitehead et al. |
6384979 | May 7, 2002 | Whitehead et al. |
6437921 | August 20, 2002 | Whitehead |
6452734 | September 17, 2002 | Whitehead et al. |
6574025 | June 3, 2003 | Whitehead et al. |
6822783 | November 23, 2004 | Matsuda et al. |
6842279 | January 11, 2005 | Amundson |
6865011 | March 8, 2005 | Whitehead et al. |
6885496 | April 26, 2005 | Whitehead et al. |
6891658 | May 10, 2005 | Whitehead et al. |
7046439 | May 16, 2006 | Kaminsky et al. |
7093968 | August 22, 2006 | Hsueh et al. |
7164536 | January 16, 2007 | Whitehead |
7170670 | January 30, 2007 | Webber |
7259744 | August 21, 2007 | Arango et al. |
7286280 | October 23, 2007 | Whitehead et al. |
7324263 | January 29, 2008 | Johnson et al. |
7422964 | September 9, 2008 | Akiyama |
7439948 | October 21, 2008 | Johnson et al. |
7454103 | November 18, 2008 | Parriaux |
7463398 | December 9, 2008 | Feenstra |
7507012 | March 24, 2009 | Aylward et al. |
7515326 | April 7, 2009 | Ibrede et al. |
7564614 | July 21, 2009 | Chen et al. |
7660509 | February 9, 2010 | Bryan et al. |
7740387 | June 22, 2010 | Schultz et al. |
7760417 | July 20, 2010 | Whitehead |
7775700 | August 17, 2010 | Lee |
7852430 | December 14, 2010 | Gettmey |
7940457 | May 10, 2011 | Jain et al. |
8022615 | September 20, 2011 | Bai et al. |
8040591 | October 18, 2011 | Whitehead |
8094364 | January 10, 2012 | Park |
8179034 | May 15, 2012 | Potts |
8384659 | February 26, 2013 | Yeo et al. |
8587512 | November 19, 2013 | Hiji et al. |
8690408 | April 8, 2014 | Li |
9360696 | June 7, 2016 | Ghali et al. |
9377574 | June 28, 2016 | Li |
20020089735 | July 11, 2002 | Albert et al. |
20020171910 | November 21, 2002 | Pullen et al. |
20030038755 | February 27, 2003 | Amundson et al. |
20030067666 | April 10, 2003 | Kawai |
20030165016 | September 4, 2003 | Whitehead et al. |
20030214697 | November 20, 2003 | Duthaler et al. |
20040136047 | July 15, 2004 | Whitehead et al. |
20040174584 | September 9, 2004 | Whitehead et al. |
20040239613 | December 2, 2004 | Kishi |
20050007000 | January 13, 2005 | Chou et al. |
20050270439 | December 8, 2005 | Weber et al. |
20060056009 | March 16, 2006 | Kombrekke et al. |
20060148262 | July 6, 2006 | Lee et al. |
20060209418 | September 21, 2006 | Whitehead |
20060291034 | December 28, 2006 | Patry et al. |
20070008739 | January 11, 2007 | Kim et al. |
20070019434 | January 25, 2007 | Lee |
20070047003 | March 1, 2007 | Suwabe |
20070091434 | April 26, 2007 | Garner et al. |
20070263137 | November 15, 2007 | Shigeta et al. |
20080174852 | July 24, 2008 | Hirai et al. |
20080203910 | August 28, 2008 | Reynolds |
20080204854 | August 28, 2008 | Whitehead et al. |
20080219024 | September 11, 2008 | Mi et al. |
20080231960 | September 25, 2008 | Van Gorkom et al. |
20080266245 | October 30, 2008 | Wilcox |
20080266646 | October 30, 2008 | Wilcox |
20080285282 | November 20, 2008 | Karman et al. |
20080297496 | December 4, 2008 | Watson et al. |
20080303994 | December 11, 2008 | Jeng et al. |
20080304134 | December 11, 2008 | Ban |
20090109172 | April 30, 2009 | Lee et al. |
20090201565 | August 13, 2009 | Bita et al. |
20090201570 | August 13, 2009 | Frazier et al. |
20090207476 | August 20, 2009 | Yanagisawa et al. |
20090225398 | September 10, 2009 | Duthaler et al. |
20090231714 | September 17, 2009 | Zhao et al. |
20090262083 | October 22, 2009 | Parekh |
20090262414 | October 22, 2009 | Whitehead |
20090322669 | December 31, 2009 | Bryning et al. |
20100079843 | April 1, 2010 | Derichs et al. |
20100085627 | April 8, 2010 | Whitehead |
20100091224 | April 15, 2010 | Cho et al. |
20100118383 | May 13, 2010 | Van Abeelen et al. |
20100148385 | June 17, 2010 | Balko et al. |
20100172016 | July 8, 2010 | Park et al. |
20100225575 | September 9, 2010 | Ishii et al. |
20100253711 | October 7, 2010 | Muroi |
20110043435 | February 24, 2011 | Hebenstreit et al. |
20110085232 | April 14, 2011 | Werner et al. |
20110273906 | November 10, 2011 | Nichol et al. |
20110279442 | November 17, 2011 | Hale et al. |
20110299014 | December 8, 2011 | Jang et al. |
20110310465 | December 22, 2011 | Takanashi |
20110316764 | December 29, 2011 | Parry-Jones et al. |
20120008203 | January 12, 2012 | Ijzerman et al. |
20120019896 | January 26, 2012 | Yoshida et al. |
20120019899 | January 26, 2012 | Yeo |
20120026576 | February 2, 2012 | Bita et al. |
20120069064 | March 22, 2012 | Yamakita |
20120081777 | April 5, 2012 | Heikenfeld et al. |
20120113367 | May 10, 2012 | Kitson et al. |
20120113499 | May 10, 2012 | Komatsu |
20120262496 | October 18, 2012 | Swic |
20120293857 | November 22, 2012 | Kwon et al. |
20130135320 | May 30, 2013 | Govil |
20130182311 | July 18, 2013 | Mochizuki et al. |
20130278995 | October 24, 2013 | Drzaic et al. |
20130334972 | December 19, 2013 | Atkins |
20140333989 | November 13, 2014 | Whitehead |
20140340376 | November 20, 2014 | Itagaki et al. |
20150146273 | May 28, 2015 | Whitehead |
20160097961 | April 7, 2016 | Whitehead |
20160139478 | May 19, 2016 | Whitehead |
20160147128 | May 26, 2016 | Loxley et al. |
333109 | August 2006 | AT |
2292441 | July 2002 | CA |
2371138 | July 2005 | CA |
2410955 | January 2007 | CA |
2474384 | August 2010 | CA |
2643808 | August 2013 | CA |
1173208 | October 2004 | CN |
101160547 | April 2008 | CN |
1454327 | September 2008 | CN |
102955318 | March 2013 | CN |
69825894 | September 2005 | DE |
1118039 | February 2003 | EP |
0988573 | August 2004 | EP |
1290486 | October 2004 | EP |
1368700 | July 2006 | EP |
2004085635 | March 2004 | JP |
2007505330 | March 2007 | JP |
3965115 | June 2007 | JP |
2007279641 | October 2007 | JP |
4113843 | April 2008 | JP |
2009251215 | October 2009 | JP |
4956610 | March 2012 | JP |
2005519329 | June 2017 | JP |
100949412 | March 2010 | KR |
2003075085 | September 2003 | WO |
2005010604 | February 2005 | WO |
2006108285 | October 2006 | WO |
2006114743 | November 2006 | WO |
2014146937 | September 2014 | WO |
2015116913 | August 2015 | WO |
2015175518 | November 2015 | WO |
2016130720 | August 2016 | WO |
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 8, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/049606.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 30, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/058118.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 11, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/030966.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 19, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/038091.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 1, 2015 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/030349.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 3, 2015 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/061911.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/066980.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 21, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/017416.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 1, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/013725.
- nternational Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/054385.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 2, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/062075.
- Mossman, M. A. et al., “A Novel Reflective Image Display Using Total Internal Reflection” Displays Devices, Dempa Publications, Tokyo JP vol. 25, No. 5 Dec. 1, 2004 pp. 215-221.
- International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/0066150.
- Gou, S. et al., “Transparent Superhydrophobic Surfaces for Applications of Controlled Reflectance” Applied Optics vol. 51, Issue No. 11, Apr. 10, 2012, pp. 1645-1653.
- Whitehead, L. et al., “The Many Roles of Illumination in Information Display” Society for Information Display Symposium (Invited Paper), Issue No. 0097-966X/06/3701-0000, May 2010.
- Wong, R. et al., “Electrochemical Threshold Conditions During Electro-Optical Switching of Ionic Electrophorectic Optical Devices” Applied Optics vol. 48, Issue No. 6, Feb. 20, 2009, pp. 1062-1072.
- Whitehead, L. et al., “Reflections on Total Internal Reflection” Optics and Photonics News Feb. 2009, pp. 28-34.
- Mossman, M. et al., “Observations of Total Internal Reflection at a Natural Super-Hydrophobic Surface” Physics in Canada vol. 64, Issue No. 1, Mar. 2008, pp. 7-11.
- Hrudey, P. et al., “Application of Transparent Nanostructured Electrodes for Modulation of Total Internal Reflection” SPIE 2007 Conference Paper No. 6647 Aug. 2007, pp. 1-12.
- Hrudey, P. et al., “Variable Diffraction Gratings Using Nanoporous Electrodes and Electrophoresis of Dye Ions” SPIE 2007 Conference Paper No. 6645 Aug. 2007, pp. 1-12.
- Webster, A. et al., “Control of Reflection at an Optical Interface in the Absence of Total Internal Reflection for a Retroreflective Display Application” Applied Optics vol. 45, Issue No. 6, Feb. 20, 2006, pp. 1169-1176.
- Mossman, M. et al., “Off the Beaten Path with Total Internal Reflection” International Optical Design Conference (Invited Paper), Jun. 2006, pp. 1-12.
- Whitehead, L. et al., “Total Internal Reflection for Illumination and Displays” SPIE Newsroom Sep. 7-8, 2006.
- Mossman, M. et al., “Controlled Frustration of TIR by Electrophoresis of Pigment Particles” Applied Optics vol. 14, Issue No. 9, Mar. 20, 2005, pp. 1601-1609.
- Kwong, V. et al., “Control of Reflectance of Liquid Droplets by Means of Electrowetting” Applied Optics vol. 43, Issue No. 4, Feb. 1, 2004, pp. 808-813.
- Mossman, M. et al. “A High Reflectance, Wide Viewing Angle Reflective Display Using Total Internal Reflection in Mirco-Hemispheres” International Display Research Conference, Issue No. 1083-1312/00/2003-0233, Sep. 2003, pp. 233-236.
- Mossman, M. et al., “Grey Scale Control of Total Internal Reflection Using Electrophoresis of Sub-Optical Pigment Particles” International Conference of the Society for Information Display, Boston, MA Issue No. 2-0966X/02/3301-0522, May 2002, pp. 522-525.
- Coope, R. et al., “Modulation of Retroreflection by Controlled Frustration of Total Internal Reflection” Applied Optics vol. 41, Issue No. 25, Sep. 1, 2002, pp. 5357-5361.
- Mossman, M. et al., “New Method for Maintaining Long Term Image Quality in a TIR Based Electrophoretic Display” International Display Research Conference, Nice, France, EURODISPLAY Oct. 2002, pp. 851-854.
- Mossman, M. et al., “New Reflective Color Display Technique Based on Total Internal Reflection and Subtractive color Filtering” International Conference of the Society for Information Display, San Jose, CA Issue No. 1-0966X/01/3201-1054, Jun. 2001, pp. 1054-1057.
- Whitehead, L. et al., “Visual Applications of Total Internal Reflection in Prismatic Microstructures” Physics in Canada Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 329-335.
- Mossman, M. et al., “A New Reflective Display Based on Total Internal Reflection in Prismatic Microstructures” Proceedings of the 2000 Society for Information Display, International Display Research Conference, Issue No. 1083-1312/00/2001-0311, Oct. 2000, pp. 311-314.
- Mossman et al. “Brightness Enhancement in TIR-Modulated Electrophoretic Reflective Image Displays”, (Biblio).
- Atsuhito et al. “Electrophoresis Device, Method of Manufacturing the Electrophoresis Device, Display, Display Substrate, and Electronic Unit”, (Abstract).
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 18, 2014
Date of Patent: Apr 10, 2018
Patent Publication Number: 20160139478
Assignee: CLEARink Displays, Inc. (Fremont, CA)
Inventor: Lorne A. Whitehead (Vancouver)
Primary Examiner: William R Alexander
Application Number: 14/777,581
International Classification: G02F 1/167 (20060101); G02F 1/133 (20060101); G02B 26/00 (20060101); G02F 1/19 (20060101);