Anti-heel lift device
FIG. 1 is a right elevation view of an anti-heel lift device embodying our new design shown in use;
FIG. 2 is a left elevation of the anti-heel lift device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a rear view of the anti-heel lift device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a top view of the anti-heel lift device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a front view of the anti-heel lift device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 6 is a bottom view of the anti-heel lift device of FIG. 1;
FIG. 7 is a laid out view of the anti-heel lift device of FIG. 1, the opposite side being a mirror image thereof;
FIG. 8 is a laid out view of a second embodiment of the anti-heel lift device, the opposite side being a mirror image thereof except for the knotted element;
FIG. 9 is a laid out view of a third embodiment of the anti-heel lift device, the opposite side being a mirror image thereof; and,
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of the embodiment of the anti-heel lift device of FIG. 7.
The broken lines shown in FIGS. 1-6 are for illustrative purposes only and forms no part of the claimed design.
Claims
We claim the ornamental design for anti-heel lift device, as shown and described.
748172 | December 1903 | Draper |
2733065 | January 1956 | Barkschat |
D226118 | January 1973 | Deberardino |
D265495 | July 20, 1982 | Dominy et al. |
D266177 | September 14, 1982 | Riggs |
4379564 | April 12, 1983 | Welker |
D299259 | January 3, 1989 | Vullierme |
D314414 | February 5, 1991 | Wendt |
5002294 | March 26, 1991 | Franz |
5056819 | October 15, 1991 | Hayes |
D326700 | June 2, 1992 | Brown et al. |
D344316 | February 15, 1994 | Gertler |
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 30, 2000
Date of Patent: Apr 30, 2002
Inventors: Daniel Gary Edwards (Darlinghurst New South Wales 2010), David Anthony Dumas (Darlinghurst New South Wales 2010)
Primary Examiner: Raphael Barkai
Attorney, Agent or Law Firm: Davis & Bujold, P.L.L.C.
Application Number: 29/125,847