Dental implant fixture
The related applications include “Unitary Dental Implant”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/177,938; “Dental Implant Fixture”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/177,947; “Dental Implant Fixture”, 29/177,944; “Dental Implant Abutment”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/177,925; “Dental Implant Abutment”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/177,949; “Dental Implant Abutment”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/177,926; “Dental Implant Abutment”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/177,948; and “Dental Implant Abutment”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/178,012, all of which are filed contemporaneously herewith.
FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a first embodiment of the dental implant fixture according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a top view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 3 is a left side view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 4 is a front view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 5 is a right side view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 6 is a rear view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 8 is a top perspective view of a second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 9 is a top view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 10 is a left side view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 11 is a front view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 12 is a right side view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 13 is a rear view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 14 is a bottom view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 15 is a top perspective view of a third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 16 is a top view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 17 is a left side view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 18 is a front view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 19 is a right side view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 20 is a rear view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 21 is a bottom view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 22 is a top perspective view of a fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 23 is a top view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 24 is a left side view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 25 is a front view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 26 is a right side view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;
FIG. 27 is a rear view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture; and,
FIG. 28 is a bottom view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture.
FIGS. 1-7 illustrate a first embodiment of a dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design.
FIGS. 8-14 illustrate a second embodiment of the dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design. Elements of the fixture that form no part of the design of the second embodiment are shown in dashed lines.
FIGS. 15-21 illustrate a third embodiment of the dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design.
FIGS. 21-28 illustrate a fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design. Elements of the fixture that form no part of the design of the fourth embodiment are shown in dashed lines.
The four embodiments of the dental implant fixture illustrated in FIGS. 1-28 are preferred for use on one side of the mouth. Four further embodiments of the dental implant fixture that are preferred for use on the other side of the mouth are mirror images of the four embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 1-28. These four additional embodiments are also intended to fall within the scope of the claim. However, since they are mirror images, they are not separately illustrated.
Claims
The ornamental design for a dental implant fixture, as shown and described.
5759034 | June 2, 1998 | Daftary |
5766010 | June 16, 1998 | Uemura |
5785525 | July 28, 1998 | Weissman |
5795160 | August 18, 1998 | Hahn et al. |
5967781 | October 19, 1999 | Gittleman |
5989030 | November 23, 1999 | Suga |
6039568 | March 21, 2000 | Hinds |
6142782 | November 7, 2000 | Lazarof |
6164969 | December 26, 2000 | Dinkelacker |
6174167 | January 16, 2001 | Wohrle |
6217333 | April 17, 2001 | Ercoli |
D446859 | August 21, 2001 | Hurson |
6283754 | September 4, 2001 | Wohrle |
6315563 | November 13, 2001 | Sager |
6402515 | June 11, 2002 | Palti et al. |
6413089 | July 2, 2002 | Ashman et al. |
6431867 | August 13, 2002 | Gittelson et al. |
6527554 | March 4, 2003 | Hurson et al. |
6537069 | March 25, 2003 | Simmons, Jr. |
- “Aesthetic Soft Tissue Integration and Optimized Emergence Profile: Provisionalization and Customized Impression Coping” Practical Periodontics & Aesthetic Dentistry 1999; 11(3); 305-314.
- “Anterior Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Surgical Challenge” Practical Periodontics & Aesthetic Dentistry 1999; 11(5) 551-558.
- “The Effects of Inter-Implant Distance on the Height of Inter-Implant Bone Crest” J Periodontal 2000; 71:546-549.
- “Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants” Bengazi, et al. 1996 Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7:30:303-310.
- “Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants” Buser, et al., 1996, Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7:11-19.
- Biologic Width Around Titanium Implants. A histometric Analysis of the Implanto-Gingival Junction Around Unloaded and Loaded Nonsubmerged Implants in the Canine Mandible, Cochran et al., Journal of Periodontal, vol. 68, No. 2;pp. 186-197.
- “Microbial Leakage and Marginal Fit of the Implant-Abutment Interface” Jansen, et al., 1997, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 12:527-540.
- “The Wide Fixture: A Solution for Special Bone Situations and a Rescue for the Compromised Implant. Part 1” Langer, et al., 1993, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 8:400-408.
- Managing the Soft Tissue Margin: The Key to Implant Aesthetics, Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry Lazzara, vol. 5, No. 5, Jun./Jul. 1993 (8 pages).
- “The Camlog Implants” Altatec Biotechnologies.
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 18, 2003
Date of Patent: Feb 17, 2004
Inventors: Carl W. Schulter (Memphis, TN), Gary Qi (Memphis, TN), Andrew J. Schulter (Germantown, TN)
Primary Examiner: Antoine Duval Davis
Attorney, Agent or Law Firm: Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, PLLC.
Application Number: 29/177,946