Dental implant fixture

- Cagenix, Inc.
Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

The related applications include “Unitary Dental Implant”Ser. No. 29/177,938; “Dental Implant Fixture”Ser. No. 29/177,946; “Dental Implant Fixture”Ser. No. 29/177,947; “Dental Implant Fixture”Ser. No. 29/177,939; “Dental Implant Fixture”Ser. No. 29/177,945; “Dental Implant Abutment”Ser. No. 29/177,950; “Dental Implant Abutment”Ser. No. 29/177,925; “Dental Implant Abutment”Ser. No. 29/177,949; “Dental Implant Abutment”Ser. No. 29/177,926; “Dental Implant Abutment”Ser. No. 29/177,948; and “Dental Implant Abutment”Ser. No. 29/178,012, all of which are filed contemporaneously herewith.

FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a first embodiment of the dental implant fixture according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a top view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 3 is a left side view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 4 is a front view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 5 is a right side view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 6 is a rear view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 7 is a bottom view of the first embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 8 is a top perspective view of a second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 9 is a top view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 10 is a left side view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 11 is a front view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 12 is a right side view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 13 is a rear view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 14 is a bottom view of the second embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 15 is a top perspective view of a third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 16 is a top view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 17 is a left side view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 18 is a front view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 19 is a right side view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 20 is a rear view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 21 is a bottom view of the third embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 22 is a top perspective view of a fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 23 is a top view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 24 is a left side view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 25 is a front view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 26 is a right side view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture;

FIG. 27 is a rear view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture; and,

FIG. 28 is a bottom view of the fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture.

FIGS. 1-7 illustrate a first embodiment of a dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design.

FIGS. 8-14 illustrate a second embodiment of the dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design. Elements of the fixture that form no part of the design of the second embodiment are shown in dashed lines.

FIGS. 15-21 illustrate a third embodiment of the dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design.

FIGS. 21-28 illustrate a fourth embodiment of the dental implant fixture. The environment is shown in broken lines and forms no part of the design. Elements of the fixture that form no part of the design of the fourth embodiment are shown in dashed lines.

The four embodiments of the dental implant fixture illustrated in FIGS. 1-28 are preferred for use on one side of the mouth. Four further embodiments of the dental implant fixture that are perferred for use on the other side of the mouth are mirror images of the four embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 1-28. These four additional embodiments are also intended to fall within the scope of the claim. However, since they are mirror images, they are not separately illustrated.

Claims

The ornamental design for a dental implant fixture, as shown and described.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
5759034 June 2, 1998 Daftary
5766010 June 16, 1998 Uemura
5785525 July 28, 1998 Weissman
5795160 August 18, 1998 Hahn et al.
5967781 October 19, 1999 Gittleman
5989030 November 23, 1999 Suga
6039568 March 21, 2000 Hinds
6142782 November 7, 2000 Lazarof
6164969 December 26, 2000 Dinkelacker
6174167 January 16, 2001 Wohrle
6217333 April 17, 2001 Ercoli
D446859 August 21, 2001 Hurson
6283754 September 4, 2001 Wohrle
6315563 November 13, 2001 Sager
6402515 June 11, 2002 Palti et al.
6413089 July 2, 2002 Ashman et al.
6431867 August 13, 2002 Gittelson et al.
6527554 March 4, 2003 Hurson et al.
6537069 March 25, 2003 Simmons, Jr.
Other references
  • “The Effects of Inter-Implant Distance on the Height of Inter-Implant Bone Crest” J Periodontal 2000; 71:546-549.
  • “Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants” Bengazi, et al. 1996 Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7:30:303-310.
  • “Aesthetic Soft Tissue Integration and Optimized Emergence Profile: Provisionalization and Customized Impression Coping” Practical Periodontics & Aesthetic Dentistry 1999; 11(3); 305-314.
  • “Anterior Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Surgical Challenge” Practical Periodontics & Aesthetic Density 1999; 11(5) 551-558.
  • “Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants” Buser, et al., 1996 Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7:11-19.
  • Biologic Width Around Titanium Implants. A histometric Analysis of the Implanto-Gingival Junction Around Unloaded and Loaded Nonsubmerged Implants in the Canine Mandible Cochran et al. Journal of Periodontal, vol. 68, No. 2;pp. 186-197.
  • “Microbial Leakage and Marginal Fit of the Implant-Abutment Interface” Jansen, et al., 1997 The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 12:527-540.
  • “The Wide Fixture: A Solution for Special Bone Situations and a Rescue for the Compromised Implant. Part 1” Langer, et al., 1993 The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 8:400-408.
  • Managing the Soft Tissue Margin: The Key to Implant Aesthetics, Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry Lazzara, vol. 5, No. 5, Jun./Jul. 1993 (8 pages).
  • “The Camlog Implants” Altatec Biotechnologies.
Patent History
Patent number: D487151
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 18, 2003
Date of Patent: Feb 24, 2004
Assignee: Cagenix, Inc. (Memphis, TN)
Inventors: Carl W. Schulter (Memphis, TN), Gary Qi (Memphis, TN), Andrew J. Schulter (Germantown, TN)
Primary Examiner: Antoine Duval Davis
Attorney, Agent or Law Firm: Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, PLLC.
Application Number: 29/177,944
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Dental (34) (D24/156)
International Classification: 2403;