Outsole for a shoe
FIG. 1 is a bottom view of an outsole in accordance with the new design;
FIG. 2 is a left view of the outsole in accordance with the embodiment of the new design shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a right view of the outsole in accordance with the embodiment of the new design shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a front view of the outsole in accordance with the embodiment of the new design shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a back view of the outsole in accordance with the embodiment of the new design shown in FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 6 is an enlarged cross-sectional view taken on line 6—6 of FIG. 1.
The broken line showing a shoe upper in FIGS. 1-5, and showing the interior surface in FIG. 6 illustrate the portions of the design that form no part of the claim.
Claims
I claim the ornamental design for outsole for a shoe, as shown and described in the drawings. It is understood that the surface of the heel is, with the exception that the heel is without ridges, the same as shown in the cross sectional view of FIG. 6.
546932 | September 1895 | Mayer |
D108320 | February 1938 | Eldon |
D114340 | April 1939 | MacLeod |
D129700 | September 1941 | Crossman |
D135963 | July 1943 | Codish |
D140174 | January 1945 | Gregg |
2377144 | May 1945 | Goldstein |
2382559 | August 1945 | Goldstein |
2412808 | December 1946 | Goldstein |
2421932 | June 1947 | Goldstein |
D270777 | October 4, 1983 | Nakagawa |
4571852 | February 25, 1986 | Lamarche et al. |
D304126 | October 24, 1989 | Christian et al. |
D459062 | June 25, 2002 | Pollastrelli |
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 14, 2003
Date of Patent: Dec 19, 2006
Assignee: Columbia Insurance Company (Omaha, NE)
Inventor: Thomas E. McClaskie (Bethlehem, PA)
Primary Examiner: Celia A. Murphy
Attorney: St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens LLC
Application Number: 29/193,807