Portion of a shoe sole

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

FIG. 1 is a front, right side and top perspective view of a portion of a shoe sole showing the new design;

FIG. 2 is a rear, right side perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a left side elevational view thereof; and,

FIG. 5 is a rear elevational view thereof.

The broken line showing of the sole in the Figures is for illustrative purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

The ornamental design for a portion of a shoe sole, as shown and described.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2953861 September 1960 Horten
4536974 August 27, 1985 Cohen
4611412 September 16, 1986 Cohen
4638577 January 27, 1987 Riggs
4753021 June 28, 1988 Cohen
4754559 July 5, 1988 Cohen
5224277 July 6, 1993 Sang Do
5279051 January 18, 1994 Whatley
5337492 August 16, 1994 Anderie et al.
5461800 October 31, 1995 Luthi et al.
D378012 February 18, 1997 Le
5625964 May 6, 1997 Lyden et al.
5713140 February 3, 1998 Baggenstoss
5784808 July 28, 1998 Hockerson
5797199 August 25, 1998 Miller et al.
5822886 October 20, 1998 Luthi et al.
5839208 November 24, 1998 Huang
6115943 September 12, 2000 Gyr
D487840 March 30, 2004 Hillyer
6769202 August 3, 2004 Luthi et al.
D495480 September 7, 2004 Laberge
D495859 September 14, 2004 Kubo et al.
D499247 December 7, 2004 Wahoske et al.
D499541 December 14, 2004 Dolan
D500585 January 11, 2005 Wahoske et al.
D503029 March 22, 2005 Sonnergren
D504205 April 26, 2005 Andrews-Kramer
D508160 August 9, 2005 Sonnergren
D511618 November 22, 2005 McDowell et al.
7017285 March 28, 2006 Lakic
D522221 June 6, 2006 Shin
D522230 June 6, 2006 Young
D523232 June 20, 2006 Shaffer
D523628 June 27, 2006 Young
D524035 July 4, 2006 Greene et al.
D524535 July 11, 2006 Cass
D527879 September 12, 2006 Cessor
D528753 September 26, 2006 Dirsa
D528754 September 26, 2006 Dirsa
D529267 October 3, 2006 Portzline
D532597 November 28, 2006 Chan
D532598 November 28, 2006 Chan
D540014 April 10, 2007 Turner et al.
D543689 June 5, 2007 Chan
D549942 September 4, 2007 Ho
D549943 September 4, 2007 Ho
D549944 September 4, 2007 Ho
D549945 September 4, 2007 Ho
D549946 September 4, 2007 Ho
D553338 October 23, 2007 Holmes
D553834 October 30, 2007 Nakano
D554840 November 13, 2007 McClaskie
D555348 November 20, 2007 Bettencourt
D555891 November 27, 2007 Bettencourt
D560060 January 22, 2008 Chan
D560061 January 22, 2008 Chan
D560062 January 22, 2008 Chan
D560063 January 22, 2008 Chan
D560903 February 5, 2008 Chan
D561437 February 12, 2008 Evans et al.
D561442 February 12, 2008 Kayano et al.
7334349 February 26, 2008 Sokolowski et al.
D571087 June 17, 2008 Dillenbeck et al.
7383647 June 10, 2008 Chan et al.
D574130 August 5, 2008 Le
D593291 June 2, 2009 Chen
D594195 June 16, 2009 Nakano
20020050077 May 2, 2002 Wang et al.
20090013559 January 15, 2009 Chan
Other references
  • AuthenticNikePowerseller, A Comparison Between Nike Air, Nike Shox and Nike Impax, eBay Guides, downloaded Oct. 25, 2007, pp. 6-7, United States (http://reviews.ebay.com/A-Comparison-Between-Nike-Air-Nike-Shox-and-Nike-ImpaxW0QQuigidZ10000000004244893).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 29/291,589, filed Sep. 6, 2007, Marya L. Chan.
Patent History
Patent number: D615286
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 22, 2008
Date of Patent: May 11, 2010
Assignee: New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. (Boston, MA)
Inventor: Paul S. Grote (Cincinnati, OH)
Primary Examiner: Dominic Simone
Attorney: Goodwin Procter LLP
Application Number: 29/312,462
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: D2/947; D2/946; D2/964