Vehicle mirror
- Ford
Latest Ford Patents:
Description
The absence or presence of surfaces on the area enclosed by broken lines is not relied upon for patentability and is not part of the claimed design. The surfaces enclosed by broken lines are illustrated in lighter tones to distinguish them from the claimed surfaces.
Claims
The ornamental design for a vehicle mirror, as shown and described.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
Other references
D410421 | June 1, 1999 | Pfeiffer |
D428840 | August 1, 2000 | Weidhase |
D432473 | October 24, 2000 | Sieber |
D455690 | April 16, 2002 | Lee |
D459685 | July 2, 2002 | Huang |
D463342 | September 24, 2002 | Sinkwitz |
D464922 | October 29, 2002 | Kuo |
D468670 | January 14, 2003 | Warming |
D478853 | August 26, 2003 | Boyer |
D493755 | August 3, 2004 | Kneefel et al. |
D500273 | December 28, 2004 | Otto et al. |
D500274 | December 28, 2004 | Pfeiffer |
- Winding Road for Drivers, Oct. 2006 http://news.windingroad.com/auto-news/ford-still-says-this-car-doesnt-exist-2009-mercury-monticello-spied/.
- Ford Freestyle Limited, Chicago 2004 (14 views).
Patent History
Patent number: D619066
Type: Grant
Filed: Feb 27, 2009
Date of Patent: Jul 6, 2010
Assignee: Ford Motor Company (Dearborn, MI)
Inventors: Edward Golden (Pinckney, MI), George Bucher (Dearborn, MI), David Mahoney (Orchard Lake, MI), Michael Webb (Harrison Township, MI)
Primary Examiner: Caron Veynar
Assistant Examiner: Abraham Bahta
Attorney: Damian Porcari
Application Number: 29/332,930
Type: Grant
Filed: Feb 27, 2009
Date of Patent: Jul 6, 2010
Assignee: Ford Motor Company (Dearborn, MI)
Inventors: Edward Golden (Pinckney, MI), George Bucher (Dearborn, MI), David Mahoney (Orchard Lake, MI), Michael Webb (Harrison Township, MI)
Primary Examiner: Caron Veynar
Assistant Examiner: Abraham Bahta
Attorney: Damian Porcari
Application Number: 29/332,930
Classifications
Current U.S. Class:
Rear View Mirror (35) (D12/187)