Case for electronic communications device

- SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD.
Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

FIG. 1 is a front perspective view of a case for electronic communications device showing my new design;

FIG. 2 is a rear perspective view thereof;

FIG. 3 is a front elevational view thereof;

FIG. 4 is a rear elevational view thereof;

FIG. 5 is a left side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 6 is a right side elevational view thereof;

FIG. 7 is a top plan view thereof;

FIG. 8 is a bottom plan view thereof;

FIG. 9 is a rear perspective view thereof showing a support leg in an extended position;

FIG. 10 is an exploded front perspective view thereof showing the components of the case separated for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 11 is an exploded rear perspective view thereof showing the components of the case separated for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 12 is a front perspective view of the inner shell component of the case shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 13 is a rear perspective view thereof shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 14 is a front perspective view of the support leg component of e case shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 15 is a rear perspective view thereof shown separately for clarity of disclosure;

FIG. 16 is a front perspective view of the outer frame component of the case shown separately for clarity of disclosure; and,

FIG. 17 is a rear perspective view thereof shown separately for clarity of disclosure.

Although the case for electronic communications device, in which the claimed design is embodied, consists of an inner shell component, an outer frame component, and a support leg component, the claim is directed to the ornamental appearance of the case for electronic communications device in its entirety and does not extend to the ornamental appearance of each of the individual components of the case for electronic communications device.

The broken lines throughout the drawing figures depict portions of the case for electronic communications device that form no part of the claimed design. The interior of the case shown in FIGS. 1, 3, 10 and 12 form no part of the claimed design. The broken lines and regions bounded by broken lines form no part of the claimed design.

Claims

The ornamental design for a case for electronic communications device, as shown and described.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
D619361 July 13, 2010 Andre
D646265 October 4, 2011 Fathollahi
D650371 December 13, 2011 Wibby
D655281 March 6, 2012 Turocy
D681615 May 7, 2013 Fathollahi
D703646 April 29, 2014 Fathollahi
D706254 June 3, 2014 Chang
D718757 December 2, 2014 Jaffee
D718758 December 2, 2014 Jaffee
D721360 January 20, 2015 Laffon de Mazieres
D739394 September 22, 2015 Rayner et al.
D746273 December 29, 2015 Herbst
D746275 December 29, 2015 Mohammad
D749535 February 16, 2016 Joung
D753099 April 5, 2016 Kim
D763841 August 16, 2016 Kim
D765634 September 6, 2016 McCray et al.
D765638 September 6, 2016 Gaylord et al.
D765640 September 6, 2016 Bulkley et al.
D765645 September 6, 2016 Kim
D771608 November 15, 2016 Kim
D772209 November 22, 2016 Kim
D776104 January 10, 2017 Tien
D776649 January 17, 2017 Kim
D777155 January 24, 2017 Kim
D777156 January 24, 2017 Kim
D777160 January 24, 2017 Kim
D777716 January 31, 2017 Kim
D778897 February 14, 2017 Kim
D778898 February 14, 2017 Kim
D780164 February 28, 2017 Lee
D780167 February 28, 2017 Tien
D786851 May 16, 2017 Kim
D786852 May 16, 2017 Kim
D786854 May 16, 2017 Kim
D787491 May 23, 2017 Kim
D787492 May 23, 2017 Kim
D788090 May 30, 2017 Kim
D789344 June 13, 2017 Kim
D791755 July 11, 2017 Kim
D796497 September 5, 2017 Kim
D797094 September 12, 2017 Kim
D800713 October 24, 2017 Kim
D803206 November 21, 2017 Kim
D806063 December 26, 2017 Kim
20110050606 March 3, 2011 Zhang
20150335116 November 26, 2015 Kim
20160101902 April 14, 2016 Kim
20160204817 July 14, 2016 Kim
20160269516 September 15, 2016 Kim
20160285301 September 29, 2016 Kim
20160374443 December 29, 2016 Kim
20170150792 June 1, 2017 Kim
20170230072 August 10, 2017 Kim
Other references
  • Review of Spigen Slim Armor Galaxy S6 Case with Kick Stand, published on Apr. 28, 2015, URL:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFvhcXcZAVo, retrieved from internet on Feb. 2, 2018.
  • Review of Spigen Slim Armor case for Galaxy S7 edge, published on May 20, 2016, URL:https://www.androidcentral.com/review-spigen-slim-armor-case-galaxy-s7-edge, retrieved from internet on Feb. 3, 2018.
  • Spigen Tough Armor Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Case, earliest customer review Apr. 28, 2017, URL: https://www.mobilefun.co.uk/spigen-tough-armor-samsung-galaxy-s8-plus-case-gunmetal-63043, retrieved from internet on Nov. 30, 2017.
  • “Spigen Slim Armor Galaxy S6 Edge Case with Kickstand and Air Cushion Technology and Hybrid Drop Protection for Galaxy S6 Edge 2015—Metal Slate”, https://www.amazon.com/SpigenKickstandCushionTechnologyProtection/dp/B00SV63G38, Earliest review date of Apr. 3, 2015.
  • “Spigen Slim Armor Galaxy S7 Edge Case with Kickstand and Air Cushion Technology and Hybrid Drop Protection for Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 2016—Gunmetal”, https://www.amazon.com/SpigenKickstandCushionTechnologyProtection/dp/B01AUR1362, Earliest review date of Feb. 24, 2016.
Patent History
Patent number: D836623
Type: Grant
Filed: Apr 18, 2017
Date of Patent: Dec 25, 2018
Assignee: SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD. (Seoul)
Inventor: Young Kwang Hyun (Seoul)
Primary Examiner: Carla J Wright
Application Number: 29/601,029
Classifications