Electrosurgical generator with adaptive power control
An electrosurgical generator has an output power control system that causes the impedance of tissue to rise and fall in a cyclic pattern until the tissue is desiccated. The advantage of the power control system is that thermal spread and charring are reduced. In addition, the power control system offers improved performance for electrosurgical vessel sealing and tissue welding. The output power is applied cyclically by a control system with tissue impedance feedback. The impedance of the tissue follows the cyclic pattern of the output power several times, depending on the state of the tissue, until the tissue becomes fully desiccated. High power is applied to cause the tissue to reach a high impedance, and then the power is reduced to allow the impedance to fall. Thermal energy is allowed to dissipate during the low power cycle. The control system is adaptive to tissue in the sense that output power is modulated in response to the impedance of the tissue.
Latest Covidien AG Patents:
This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/838,548, filed on Apr. 9, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,033,399, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an electrosurgical generator with an adaptive power control, and more particularly to an eleosurgical generator that controls the output power in a manner that causes impedance of tissue to rise and fall cyclically until the tissue is completely desiccated.
2. Background of the Disclosure
Electrosurgical generators are used by surgeons to cut and coagulate tissue of a patient. High frequency electrical power is produced by the electrosurgical generator and applied to the surgical site by an electrosurgical tool. Monopolar and bipolar configurations are common in electrosurgical procedures.
Electrosurgical generators are typically comprised of power supply circuits, front panel interface circuits, and RF output stage circuits. Many electrical designs for electrosurgical generators are known in the field. In certain electrosurgical generator designs, the RF output stage can be adjusted to control the RMS output power. The methods of controlling the RF output stage may comprise changing the duty cycle, or changing the amplitude of the driving signal to the RF output stage. The method of controlling the RF output stage is described herein as changing an input to the RF output stage.
Electrosurgical techniques have been used to seal small diameter blood vessels and vascular bundles. Another application of electrosurgical energy is tissue welding. In this application, two layers of tissue are grasped and clamped together while electrosurgical power is applied. The two layers are thereby welded together. Tissue welding is similar to vessel sealing, except that a vessel or duct is not necessarily sealed in this process. For example, tissue welding may be used instead of staples for surgical anastomosis. Electrosurgical power has a desiccating effect on tissue during tissue welding or vessel sealing. As used herein, the term “electrosurgical desiccation” is meant to encompass any tissue desiccation procedure, including standard electrosurgical coagulation, desiccation, vessel sealing, and tissue welding.
One of the problems associated with electrosurgical desiccation is undesirable tissue damage due to thermal effects. The tissue at the operative site is heated by the electrosurgical current. Healthy tissue adjacent to the operative site can become thermally damaged if too much heat is allowed to build up at the operative site. The heat may conduct to the adjacent tissue and cause a large region of tissue necrosis. This is known as thermal spread. The problem of thermal spread becomes important when electrosurgical tools are used in close proximity to delicate anatomical structures. Therefore, an electrosurgical generator that reduced the possibility of thermal spread would offer a better opportunity for a successful surgical outcome.
Another problem that is associated with electrosurgical desiccation is a buildup of eschar on the surgical tool. Eschar is a deposit on an electrosurgical tool that is created from tissue that is desiccated and then charred by heat. The surgical tools win often lose effectiveness when they are coated with eschar. The buildup of eschar could be reduced when less heat is developed at the operative site.
Practitioners have known that a measurement of electrical impedance of tissue is a good indication of the state of desiccation of the tissue. Several commercially available electrosurgical generators can automatically terminate output power based on a measurement of impedance. Several methods for determining the optimal point of desiccation are known in the field. One method sets a threshold impedance, and terminates power once the measured impedance of the tissue crosses the threshold. Another method terminates power based on dynamic variations in the impedance.
A discussion of the dynamic variations of impedance of tissue can be found in the article, Vallfors and Bergdahl “Automatically Controlled Bipolar Electrocoagulation,” Neurosurgical Review, 7:2-3, pp. 187-190, 1984.
A second article by Bergdahl and Vallfors, “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator,” Journal of Neurosurgery, 75:1, 148-151, July 1991, discusses the impedance behavior of tissue and its application to electrosurgical vessel sealing. The Bergdahl article reported that the impedance had a minimum value at the moment of coagulation. The Bergdahl article also reported that it was not possible to coagulate safely arteries with a diameter larger than 2 to 2.5 millimeters. The present invention helps to overcome this limitation by enabling electrosurgical vessel sealing of larger diameter vessels.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,684 discloses a method and apparatus for electrosurgically treating tissue in a manner similar to the disclosures of Vallfors and Bergdahl. The '684 patent addresses the problem associated with turning off the RF output automatically after the tissue impedance has reached a minimum value. A storage device records maximum and minimum impedance values, and an algorithm computes an optimal time for terminating output power.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,191,188 discloses a variable crest factor electrosurgical generator. The crest factor is disclosed to be associated with the coagulation effectiveness of the electrosurgical waveform.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,472,443 discloses the variation of tissue impedance with temperature. The impedance of tissue is shown to fall, and then subsequently rise as the temperature is increased. The '443 patent shows a relatively lower temperature region (Region A in
It would be desirable to have an electrosurgical generator that produced a clinically effective output and, in addition, reduced the amount of heat and thermal spread at the operative site. It would also be desirable to have an electrosurgical generator that produced a better quality seal for vessel sealing and tissue welding operations. It would also be desirable to have an electrosurgical generator that desiccated tissue by applying a minimal amount of electrosurgical energy.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to an electrosurgical generator having an improved output power controller for increasing the quality and reliability of electrosurgically sealing vessels, sealing ducts, welding and desiccating tissue. In particular, the output power is controlled in a manner that causes impedance of tissue to rise and fall repeatedly until the tissue is completely desiccated. The output power and the tissue impedance are both part of a control system wherein the output power is cycled to thereby cause a cycling of the tissue impedance. A basis for this invention is an experimental observation that the electrical impedance of tissue will usually rise when electrosurgical power is applied, and the electrical impedance of tissue will usually fall when the electrosurgical power is reduced or terminated. Presently available electrosurgical generators will monitor the rising impedance of tissue as power is applied. However, the applicant is the first to design an electrosurgical generator with a power control system that actively cause the impedance of the tissue to rise and fall repeatedly until the tissue is desiccated, and thereby achieve beneficial surgical effects.
The application of electrosurgical power is known to cause the impedance of tissue to fall to a local minimum and then rise monotonically thereafter. If the electrosurgical power is applied for too long, the tissue may char and stick to the electrode. Whereas prior designs terminated output power after the first local minimum in the impedance measurement, the present invention actively causes several local impedance minima to occur. Power can be terminated in the present invention based on an impedance limit, a time limit, or based on the responsiveness of the tissue to changes in output power from the generator.
An advantage of the present invention is that it can coagulate tissue with a reduced level of tissue charring. Another benefit of the present invention is that it has improved tissue sealing characteristics. Yet another benefit of the present invention is that it reduces thermal spread and thereby reduces damage to adjacent tissue. Yet another advantage of the present invention is that it reduces the tendency for eschar buildup on the electrosurgical tool. Yet another advantage of the present invention is that large vessels and ducts can be electrosurgically sealed.
It is thought that impedance of tissue can rise and fall depending on several factors, including output power, output voltage, output current, temperature, and pressure on the tissue exerted by surgical graspers. The present invention addresses changes in impedance of tissue that can be attributed to electrosurgical power application, wherein the power can be adjusted by changing the output voltage or the output current. The present invention causes the tissue impedance to rise and fall repeatedly until the tissue is completely desiccated. The present invention adjusts the output power in a manner that is based on feedback from a tissue impedance measurement.
According to the present invention, the impedance of the tissue rises and falls in response to relatively low frequency cycling of the electrosurgical power. The electrosurgical power is raised and lowered (also referenced herein as “cycled”) at a relatively low frequency, and the impedance of the tissue is thereby caused to rise and fall at approximately the same frequency until the tissue becomes desiccated. The manner in which the electrosurgical power is raised and lowered may be accomplished in several ways which incorporate well known principles of control system design.
The frequency of power cycling in the present invention is different from the RF modulation frequency of the electrosurgical waveforms, which are typically in the range of one hundred kilohertz to one megahertz. The frequency of power cycling of the present invention is also different from the duty cycle of generators that causes a coagulation effect on tissue, which is typically in the frequency range above one thousand hertz. The frequency range of power cycling in the present invention is typically between one and twenty hertz. Both the RF modulation and the duty cycling of present electrosurgical generators may occur simultaneously with the power cycling of the present invention.
The frequency at which the electrosurgical power is raised and lowered (i.e. cycled or modulated) should not be too high, otherwise the impedance of the tissue will not be able to rise and fall in response with an amplitude that will produce additional benefits. Similarly, the frequency should not be too low, otherwise the beneficial aspects of the invention will not become apparent because the tissue will desiccate without any appreciable modulation. The range of effective frequencies of the present invention has been called “thermal bandwidth.”
The behavior of the tissue impedance is possibly related to the thermal time constant of the tissue. There are additional factors that affect the tissue impedance, including the water content in the tissue and steam. After the tissue is desiccated, which is indicated by a high measured impedance, further application of electrosurgical power will cause undesirable charring. Thus, it is preferred to have impedance monitoring to determine the appropriate time for terminating the electrosurgical power. Impedance monitoring is also preferred so that the modulation frequency of the electrosurgical power can be automatically adjusted and kept within the thermal bandwidth.
It is theorized by the inventor that thermal spread during electrosurgical desiccation is created in at least three ways. The first is through direct thermal conduction away from the weld site. The second is from hot steam exiting the weld site. This mechanism is perhaps far more significant than the first, because of the steam's high mobility. The third mechanism is the lateral spread of current away from the weld site. It is theorized that the third mechanism is due to steam creating a high impedance pathway between the jaws, which forces a larger portion of the current to flow laterally. The present invention controls the output power in a manner that reduces thermal spread.
The present invention is relevant to all electrosurgical generators. It has been found to be particularly relevant to bipolar electrosurgical applications, as well as to elecosurgical tissue welding and vessel sealing. Skilled practitioners will recognize the value of the invention wherever tissue desiccation is accomplished by electrosurgical methods.
FIG. 2(a) is a sample of experimental data for a standard vessel sealing operation, showing output power as function of time.
FIG. 2(b) is a sample of experimental data for a standard vessel sealing operation, showing load impedance as a function of time.
FIG. 2(c) is a sample of experimental data for a standard vessel sealing operation, showing output current as a function of time.
FIG. 2(d) is a sample of experimental data for a standard vessel sealing operation, showing output voltage as a function of time.
FIG. 3(a) is a sample of experimental data for an adaptive power control generator, showing output power as fiction of time.
FIG. 3(b) is a sample of experimental data for an adaptive power control generator, showing load impedance as a function of time.
FIG. 3(c) is a sample of experimental data for an adaptive power control generator, showing output current as a function of time.
FIG. 3(d) is a sample of experimental data for an adaptive power control generator, showing output voltage as a function of time.
FIG. 4(a) is a representation of a power curve for a standard electrosurgical generator.
FIG. 4(b) is a representation of an adaptive oscillatory power curve.
The present invention discloses an adaptive, oscillatory power curve which is able to reduce thermal spread in each of these areas by applying power in a cyclical fashion, rather than continuously. During the periods of reduced power application, thermal energy is allowed to dissipate which reduces direct thermal conduction. Also, the steam exits the weld site in smaller bursts, which produces less thermal damage than one large burst. Finally, the impedance between the jaws of the electrosurgical instrument is kept low, which allows current to flow more directly between the jaws.
Charring is also reduced. High voltages contribute to tissue charring, which is why it is preferable to limit the output voltage of the electrosurgical general to 120 volts, and to periodically reduce it to a lower value during power cycling. A relatively low voltage is also important because it prevents electrical sparks, or arcs, from passing through the tissue and burning small holes in the newly sealed, or welded, tissue.
The transparency, or clarity, at the weld site has been identified as an indicator of successful seal completion. It also gives the surgeon visual feedback as to whether the seal is a success. Preliminary findings indicate that this method may also increase weld site transparency. The reason for this is unknown, but it seems reasonable that reduced charring will allow the weld site to remain more transparent.
Referring to
The difference signal C may be input to a controller 12 that generates a control signal D. The control signal D adjusts or terminates the output power of the electrosurgical generator by changing the state of the RF. Output Stage 13. The controller 12 may be comprised of an algorithm in a microprocessor that determines the conditions for power termination based on the amplitude of the control signal. Alternatively and equivalently, the controller 12 may be connected directly to the measured tissue impedance B to terminate power based on the amplitude of the measured tissue impedance B. The controller 12 may be comprised of any combination of proportional integral, and derivative control laws that are known to control system engineers. Other types of control laws, such as “bang-bang ” control laws, are effective equivalents.
In one embodiment, the command input signal A has a cyclic pattern, for example a sine wave or a square wave. The cyclic nature of the command input signal A causes the control system 10 to regulate the output power in a cyclic manner to achieve beneficial surgical effects. The controller 12 monitors the difference signal C to determine the response of the output power E. In one embodiment, when the difference signal C is large, and the impedance measurement B is above threshold, then the controller 12 terminates the output power E.
The control signal D is preferably connected to an R.F. Output Stage 13. The control signal D preferably changes a driving voltage in the R.F. output stage to thereby change the RMS output power from the electrosurgical generator, shown as line E in FIG. 1. Alternatively and equivalently, the control signal D may change the duty cycle of the R.F. Output Stage 13 thereby effectively changing the RMS output power. Other means of changing RMS output power from an R.F. Output Stage, such as changing current, are known to electrical engineers.
The generator R.F. Output Stage 13 causes the electrosurgical generator to output a power level E to the tissue 14 of the patient. The tissue 14 becomes desiccated, thereby changing the electrical impedance, shown by F in FIG. 1. The electrical impedance F of the tissue is measured by an impedance measurement circuit 15 and reported as the measured tissue impedance B. The impedance measurement circuit 15 may be any form of electrical circuit that measures, or estimates, electrical impedance. The measured tissue impedance B is preferably an electrical signal that is proportional to the actual tissue impedance F.
Electrical engineers will recognize that output power from an electrosurgical generator can be adjusted in several ways. For example, the amplitude of the output power can be adjusted. In another example, the output power can be adjusted by changing the duty cycle or the crest factor. The change or adjustment in output power, as used herein is meant to refer any change or adjustment in the root mean square (RMS) value of the output power of the electrosurgical generator.
In operation, the control system 10 is designed to cycle the tissue impedance F for preferably several cycles in order to achieve beneficial effects. Thus, the command input signal A is a cyclically varying signal such as a sine wave. An example of cyclical impedance behavior of tissue is shown in FIG. 3(b). The generator output power that caused the cyclical impedance behavior is shown in FIG. 3(a). The cyclical behavior of the present invention can be contrasted with a standard electrosurgical generator wherein the output power is shown in FIG. 2(a) and the tissue impedance is shown in 2(b).
The present invention discloses an adaptive, oscillatory power curve which is able to reduce thermal spread in each of these areas by applying power in a cyclical fashion, rather than continuously. During the periods of reduced power application, thermal energy is allowed to dissipate which reduces direct thermal conduction. Also, the steam exits the weld site in smaller bursts, which produces less thermal damage than one large burst. Finally, the impedance between the jaws of the electrosurgical instrument is kept low, which allows current to flow more directly between the jaws.
Charring is thought to be reduced by the present invention. High voltages contribute to tissue charring, which is why it is preferable to limit the output voltage of the electrosurgical generator to 120 volts, and to periodically reduce it to a lower value during power cycling. A relatively low voltage is also important because it prevents electrical sparks, or arcs, from passing through the tissue and burning small holes in the newly sealed, or welded, tissue.
The transparency, or clarity, at the weld site has been identified as an indicator of successful seal completion. It also gives the surgeon visual feedback as to whether the seal is a success. Preliminary findings indicate that this method may also increase weld site transparency. The reason for this is unknown, but it seems reasonable that reduced charring will allow the weld site to remain more transparent.
A plot of output power vs. load impedance is called a “power curve.” A representation of a standard power curve is shown in FIG. 4(a). At low impedance, the output is typically current limited, and this is shown as the “constant current” line segment on FIG. 4(a). At midranges of impedance, the electrosurgical generator has a power control system that maintains the output power at a constant level by adjusting the output voltage, as shown by the “constant power” line segment on FIG. 4(a). Eventually, the load impedance becomes large, and the output power cannot be maintained without applying unacceptably high output voltages. Thus, a voltage limit is reached, and the output power drops off because the output current is falling and the output voltage is at a limit. The drop in output power is shown as the “constant voltage” line segment in FIG. 4(a).
The present invention is related to an electrosurgical generator having an adaptive oscillatory power curve as shown in FIG. 4(b). The adaptive oscillatory power curve is produced by a power control system in the electrosurgical generator. The design details of the control system can be implemented in several ways which are well known to control system engineers.
The first part of the adaptive oscillatory power curve, shown at the line segment I in FIG. 4(b), is similar to the standard power curve, wherein the generator applies high current into a low impedance load until a maximum power limit, shown as A, is reached. In the next “leg” of the power curve, shown by line segment B, output current begins to fall, and output voltage begins to rise as the generator adjusts the output voltage to maintain constant output power at the level marked by A. The generator then begins looking for signs to indicate the onset of boiling in the tissue. Such signs include a very rapid rise in impedance, or a high value of voltage, such as 120 volts. The local maximum of the impedance curve is shown by letter K in FIG. 4(b). The dotted line, marked C and labeled V=120 V, shows the possible output power if the generator were to maintain a voltage limit of 120 volts, which is a preferred voltage limit. Rather than follow the V=120 V line, a controller in the generator drops the output power. This can be accomplished, in one embodiment, by dropping the output voltage limit to between zero and 70 volts, and preferably 50 volts, as shown in line segment D. In another embodiment of the control system, the output power can be reduced by other combinations of output current reduction and/or output voltage reduction.
As a consequence of the lower voltage limit, the output power drops to the level indicated by H in FIG. 4(b). In certain embodiments, H may be zero watts. At this lower output power, desiccation stops and the tissue impedance starts to fall. A preferred lower voltage limit of 50 volts may be used as shown by dotted line E and marked “V=50 volts”. Once the impedance has reached a local minimum, shown by J, or after a set period of time, the power control system raises the output power back to level A, which corresponds to an output voltage limit of 120 volts in the preferred embodiment. Thus, the output power rises back to level A, and the impedance rises again, until the onset of boiling or an impedance threshold is reached. The cyclical portion of the power curve incorporating line segments B, D, and E is an important part of this invention and will continue until the tissue is desiccated. When the tissue is desiccated, the power will terminate as shown when impedance reaches point L. In certain embodiments, point L will be substantially the same as point K.
The behavior shown in FIG. 4(b) can be observed in FIGS. 3(a), 3(b), 3(c) and 3(d). Power oscillations between 120 watts and 20 watts in FIG. 3(a) correspond to cyclical movement between power level A and power level H in FIG. 4(b). Impedance oscillations in FIG. 3(b) correspond to cyclical movement between impedance level K and impedance level J in FIG. 4(b). It will be understood by control systems engineers that FIG. 4(b) is highly idealized, and the cyclical behavior may not always reach exactly the same local maxima and minima. This can be observed in FIG. 3(a), where the local maxima of the power curve may not always reach 120 volts.
It is theorized by the inventor that the following phenomena occur. The initial high output power initiates boiling in the tissues. The subsequent low output power is insufficient to maintain boiling, and hence boiling in the tissue stops. After boiling stops, if the tissue is not completely desiccated then the impedance will fall to a lower value. Next, the low impedance allows output power to increase, which re-heats the tissue to the point of boiling. The voltage is also pulled higher during the process, and remains so until the power curve can sense the onset of boiling, and lower the voltage, preferably back to 50 volts. The process continues until the tissue is fully desiccated. An oscillation is one cycle of high output power followed by low output power.
FIGS. 2(a) through 2(d) show experimental results on tissue samples using a standard power curve. FIGS. 3(a) through 3(d) show experimental results using an adaptive oscillatory power curve. The general nature of the invention can be seen by comparing FIG. 2(a) with FIG. 3(a). FIG. 2(a) shows a 100 watt electrosurgical output that is applied continuously to tissue. As the tissue desiccates, the impedance of the tissue rises and the output power in FIG. 2(a) is seen to fall off below 20 watts. In contrast, FIG. 3(a) shows an oscillating output power that varies from approximately 100 watts to approximately 20 watts. The effects on tissue impedance can be seen by comparing FIG. 2(b) with FIG. 3(b). The tissue impedance resulting from the standard power curve is shown to continuously increase in FIG. 2(b), perhaps after an initial drop. The tissue impedance resulting from the adaptive oscillatory power curve is shown to oscillate in FIG. 3(b) and thus has several local minima.
Output voltage and output current show a cyclic behavior in the adaptive oscillatory power curve. The cyclic behavior is absent in the standard power curve. FIGS. 2(c) and 3(c) can be compared to show the difference in output current between the standard power curve and the adaptive oscillatory power curve. In each case the maximum output current rises above 2 amps RMS. FIGS. 2(d) and 3(d) can be compared to show the difference in output voltage between the standard power curve and the adaptive oscillatory power curve. A voltage limit, preferably in each case 120 volts, prevents arcing that might leave pinholes in the tissue seal.
In one embodiment of the adaptive oscillatory power curve, the generator temporarily lowers the output voltage limit to 50 volts whenever the output voltage reaches 120 volts. This causes a reduction in output power, and if the tissue is not completely desiccated, a corresponding significant reduction in tissue impedance. After the reduction in tissue impedance, the output voltage limit is reset to 120 volts, allowing a rise in output power. This reduction and subsequent rise in output power constitutes a cycle.
Designers of electrosurgical generators have found that impedance is a good indicator of the desiccation state of the tissue. However, skilled artisans will recognize that it may not be necessary to compute an exact value for impedance. An electrical measurement that is proportional to the tissue impedance can be used as a functional equivalent. In one embodiment, the control system can properly create the adaptive oscillatory power curve based on measurements of time, and output voltage.
Table 1 shows a comparison between two sets of tests which compare a standard power curve with an adaptive oscillatory power curve. Test 1 indicates use of the standard power curve, while Test 2 indicates the use of the adaptive oscillatory power curve. Size indicates the vessel diameter in millimeters, burst pressures are measured in p.s.i., sticking, charring, and clarity are subjective measures ranked from 0 to 3, (where 0 represents a low value for sticking and charring, and 0 represents a poor value for clarity), and ts indicates thermal spread, measured in millimeters.
Table 1 illustrates that the adaptive oscillatory power curve (Test 2) has several advantages over the standard power curve (Test 1). Most notable is the lower amount of thermal spread: a mean value of 2. 1 mm for the standard power curve, and 1.65 mm for the adaptive oscillatory power curve. The subjective measures for sticking, charring and clarity of the weld show that the adaptive oscillatory power curve offer improvements over the standard power curve.
In general, the invention is an electrosurgical generator for treating tissue, wherein the electrosurgical generator comprises a circuit for generating a measurement of the load impedance, and an output power controller having means for inducing multiple oscillations of the load impedance in response to the measurement. The load impedance refers to the impedance of the tissue being treated by the electrosurgical generator. The circuit for generating a measurement of the load impedance can be analog or digital, and typically requires an output voltage sensor and an output current sensor. The output voltage is divided by the output current to compute a measurement of load impedance.
The means for inducing multiple oscillations of the load impedance preferably comprises a control system which can selectively control the output voltage to cause appropriate oscillations of the output power. In many electrosurgical generators, an output power control circuit has an adjustable voltage supply connected to the primary side of an isolation transformer. The secondary winding of the transformer is connected to an output resonant circuit. The voltage supply has an adjuster for changing the voltage to the transformer, and thereby changing the output voltage of the electrosurgical generator. A digital signal may be used to control the voltage supply.
The means for inducing multiple oscillations preferably comprise a feedback control system, where the feedback is a measurement of the load impedance. The control system preferably includes an algorithm in a microprocessor. The algorithm in the microprocessor can monitor the load impedance and determine how the load impedance is responding to a change in the output power.
In the preferred embodiment, the control system sets an output voltage limit of 120 volts RMS, and then controls the output power to a user desired setting, for example 100 watts. When the impedance is relatively low, a high current will combine with an output voltage of less than 120 volts to yield the desired power of 100 watts. As the impedance rises, the output current will fall, and the output voltage will be increased by the circuit to maintain the desired output power. When the voltage limit of 120 volts is reached, the control system will automatically lower the output voltage to a low value, preferably 50 volts. This effectively lowers the output power. If the tissue is not completely desiccated, the lower output power will cause the impedance to drop significantly. Once a local impedance minimum is detected, or after a set period of time, the output voltage limit is reset to 120 volts by the control system, and the cycle repeats. It has been found through experimentation that the oscillations of the load impedance will occur in the frequency range of one to twenty hertz, and this range has been referred to herein as the thermal bandwidth. In one embodiment, the control system terminates the output power after a set period of time which was three seconds. Alternatively, the control system can terminate power when the impedance reaches a threshold of 2000 ohms. Another alternative is to terminate output power when the measurement of impedance indicates that the impedance does not substantially fall in response to a drop in the output power.
The present invention is applicable to any form of electrosurgical coagulation. The benefits of the present invention, including reduced thermal spread, less eschar buildup, and improved desiccation, can be applied to both monopolar and bipolar electrosurgical generator outputs. While a particular preferred embodiment has been illustrated and described, the scope of protection sought is in the claims that follow.
Claims
1. An electrosurgical generator for applying output power to tissue to desiccate tissue, the electrosurgical generator comprising:
- a controller for cycling the output power to cause a cycling of the tissue impedance; and
- a tissue impedance measurement circuit coupled to said controller for measuring impedance of the tissue;
- wherein the controller cycles the output power by applying a predetermined amount of output power to said tissue, lowering the output power upon an output voltage reaching a predetermined maximum, re-applying the predetermined amount of output power to said tissue of a measured tissue impedance does not indicate desiccation of the tissue, and terminating output power when the measured tissue impedance exceeds a predetermined value, the predetermined value corresponding to a desiccated condition of tissue.
2. The generator of claim 1, wherein the controller changes the output voltage to cycle the output power.
3. The generator of claim 1, wherein the controller changes the output current to cycle the output power.
4. The generator of claim 1, wherein the output voltage is cycled by lowering the output voltage once it reaches a predetermined maximum and raising the output voltage if the reduction in measured tissue impedance does not indicate desiccation of the tissue.
5. The generator of claim 1, wherein the output power is cycled at a frequency that is between 1 and 20 Hz.
6. The generator of claim 1, wherein the output voltage does not exceed 120 volts.
7. The generator of claim 1, further comprising a comparator wherein the measured tissue impedance value is compared to a first signal representative of a desired tissue impedance value by the comparator and a difference signal is produced.
8. The generator of claim 7, wherein the difference signal is input to the controller which generates a signal to adjust the power.
9. The generator of claim 7, wherein the first signal has a cyclic pattern.
10. The generator of claim 9, wherein the first signal is a sine wave.
11. An electrosurgical generator for treating tissue by applying energy comprising:
- a desiccation detector for measuring a degree of desiccation of tissue; and
- a controller for minimizing the burning of tissue comprising power control circuitry for repeatedly increasing and decreasing output power to the tissue to be treated, the power control circuitry coupled to the desiccation detector and operating to adjust the output power in response to the degree of desiccation of the tissue by applying a predetermined amount of output power to said tissue, lowering the output power upon an output voltage reaching a predetermined maximum, and re-applying the predetermined amount of output power to said tissue if said desiccation detector does not indicate desiccation of the tissue.
12. The generator of claim 11, wherein the output power is terminated by said controller upon detection of desiccated tissue.
13. The generator of claim 12, wherein the desiccation detector further comprises impedance measuring circuitry, wherein the degree of desiccation of the tissue is determined by the impedance of the tissue measured by the impedance measuring circuitry.
14. The generator of claim 13, wherein the circuitry adjusts the output power by adjusting the output voltage within a predetermined voltage range.
15. The generator of claim 11, wherein the output power is repeatedly increased and decreased by the circuitry at a frequency between 1 and 20 Hz.
16. A method for applying energy to tissue to treat tissue, the method including supplying a generator having a power control system to produce an adaptive oscillatory power curve to minimize the heating effect on tissue, the method comprising:
- a) applying a high current into a low impedance load until a maximum power is reached;
- b) adjusting the output voltage to maintain constant output power as impedance increases as tissue begins to desiccate;
- c) dropping the output power in response to a rapid rise in tissue impedance indicating the boiling of tissue;
- d) allowing the tissue impedance to fall to a predetermined minimum value and then raising the output power to cause an increase in tissue impedance;
- e) repeating steps b and c until impedance reaches a maximum value.
17. A method for applying energy to tissue to treat tissue, the method including supplying a generator having a power control system to produce an adaptive oscillatory power curve to minimize the heating effect on tissue, the method comprising:
- a) applying a high current into a low impedance load until a maximum power is reached;
- b) adjusting the output voltage to maintain constant output power as impedance increases as tissue begins to desiccate;
- c) dropping the output power if the output voltage exceeds a maximum value;
- d) raising the output power after a predetermined period of time to cause an increase in tissue impedance; and
- e) repeating steps b and c until impedance reaches a maximum value.
18. A method for applying energy to tissue to treat the tissue, comprising steps of:
- providing an electrosurgical generator;
- coupling an output of the generator to tissue to be treated; and
- coupling electrosurgical energy from the generator into the tissue in an oscillatory manner until an impedance of the tissue rises to a value that indicates that the tissue is desiccated, wherein the electrosurgical energy is coupled into the tissue with an oscillatory frequency that lies within a thermal bandwidth of the tissue.
19. A method as in claim 18, wherein the frequency is within a range of about one Hertz to about 20 Hertz.
20. A method of applying energy to tissue to treat the tissue, the method including supplying a generator having a power control system to produce an adaptive oscillatory power curve to minimize the heating effect on tissue, the method comprising the steps of:
- applying a high current into a low impedance load until a maximum power is reached;
- adjusting the output voltage to maintain constant output power as impedance increases as tissue begins to desiccate;
- dropping the output power in response to a rapid rise in tissue impedance indicating the boiling of tissue;
- allowing the tissue to cool until the tissue impedance reaches a predetermined minimum value and then raising the output power to cause an increase in tissue impedance; and
- repeating the adjusting and dropping steps until the tissue impedance reaches a maximum value.
21. A method of applying energy to tissue to treat tissue, the method comprising the steps of:
- supplying a generator having a power control system to produce an adaptive oscillatory power curve to minimize the heating effect on tissue;
- coupling electrosurgical energy from the generator into the tissue in an oscillatory manner until an impedance of the tissue rises to a value that indicates that the tissue is desiccated;
- adjusting an output voltage to apply output power to the tissue in a cyclical fashion such that there are periods of increased power application and periods of reduced power application; and
- allowing thermal energy to dissipate during the periods of reduced power application.
22. The method of claim 21 wherein the electrosurgical energy is coupled into the tissue with an oscillatory frequency that lies within a thermal bandwidth of the tissue.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein the frequency is within a range of about one Hertz to about 20 Hertz.
24. The method of claim 21 wherein the output voltage of the generator is limited to 120 volts to further minimize the heating effect on the tissue.
| 1787709 | January 1931 | Wappler |
| 1813902 | July 1931 | Bovie |
| 1841968 | January 1932 | Lowry |
| 1863118 | June 1932 | Liebel |
| 1945867 | February 1934 | Rawls |
| 2827056 | March 1958 | Degelman |
| 2849611 | August 1958 | Adams |
| 2982881 | May 1961 | Reich |
| 3058470 | October 1962 | Seeliger et al. |
| 3089496 | May 1963 | Degelman |
| 3163165 | December 1964 | Islikawa |
| 3252052 | May 1966 | Nash |
| 3391351 | July 1968 | Trent |
| 3402326 | September 1968 | Guasco et al. |
| 3413480 | November 1968 | Biard et al. |
| 3436563 | April 1969 | Regitz |
| 3439253 | April 1969 | Piteo |
| 3439680 | April 1969 | Thomas, Jr. |
| 3461874 | August 1969 | Martinez |
| 3471770 | October 1969 | Haire |
| 3478744 | November 1969 | Leiter |
| 3486115 | December 1969 | Anderson |
| 3495584 | February 1970 | Schwalm |
| 3513353 | May 1970 | Lansch |
| 3514689 | May 1970 | Giannamore |
| 3515943 | June 1970 | Warrington |
| 3551786 | December 1970 | Van Gulik |
| 3562623 | February 1971 | Farnsworth |
| 3571644 | March 1971 | Jakoubovitch |
| 3589363 | June 1971 | Banko |
| 3595221 | July 1971 | Blackett |
| 3601126 | August 1971 | Estes |
| 3611053 | October 1971 | Rowell |
| 3641422 | February 1972 | Farnsworth et al. |
| 3662151 | May 1972 | Haffey |
| 3675655 | July 1972 | Sittner |
| 3683923 | August 1972 | Anderson |
| 3693613 | September 1972 | Kelman |
| 3697808 | October 1972 | Lee |
| 3699967 | October 1972 | Anderson |
| 3720896 | March 1973 | Bierlein |
| 3743918 | July 1973 | Maitre |
| 3766434 | October 1973 | Sherman |
| 3768482 | October 1973 | Shaw |
| 3783340 | January 1974 | Becker |
| 3784842 | January 1974 | Kremer |
| 3801766 | April 1974 | Morrison, Jr. |
| 3801800 | April 1974 | Newton |
| 3812858 | May 1974 | Oringer |
| 3815015 | June 1974 | Swin et al. |
| 3826263 | July 1974 | Cage et al. |
| 3828768 | August 1974 | Douglas |
| 3848600 | November 1974 | Patrick, Jr. et al. |
| 3870047 | March 1975 | Gonser |
| 3875945 | April 1975 | Friedman |
| 3885569 | May 1975 | Judson |
| 3897787 | August 1975 | Ikuno et al. |
| 3897788 | August 1975 | Newton |
| 3901216 | August 1975 | Felger |
| 3905373 | September 1975 | Gonser |
| 3913583 | October 1975 | Bross |
| 3923063 | December 1975 | Andrews et al. |
| 3933157 | January 20, 1976 | Bjurwill et al. |
| 3946738 | March 30, 1976 | Newton et al. |
| 3952748 | April 27, 1976 | Kaliher et al. |
| 3963030 | June 15, 1976 | Newton |
| 3964487 | June 22, 1976 | Judson |
| 3971365 | July 27, 1976 | Smith |
| 3980085 | September 14, 1976 | Ikuno |
| 4005714 | February 1, 1977 | Hilebrandt |
| 4024467 | May 17, 1977 | Andrews et al. |
| 4041952 | August 16, 1977 | Morrison, Jr. et al. |
| 4051855 | October 4, 1977 | Schneiderman |
| 4063557 | December 20, 1977 | Wuchinich et al. |
| 4074719 | February 21, 1978 | Semm |
| 4092986 | June 6, 1978 | Schneiderman |
| 4094320 | June 13, 1978 | Newton et al. |
| 4102341 | July 25, 1978 | Ikuno et al. |
| 4114623 | September 19, 1978 | Meinke et al. |
| 4121590 | October 24, 1978 | Gonser |
| 4123673 | October 31, 1978 | Gonser |
| 4126137 | November 21, 1978 | Archibald |
| 4145636 | March 20, 1979 | Doi |
| 4188927 | February 19, 1980 | Harris |
| 4191188 | March 4, 1980 | Belt et al. |
| 4196734 | April 8, 1980 | Harris |
| 4200104 | April 29, 1980 | Harris |
| 4200105 | April 29, 1980 | Gosner |
| 4209018 | June 24, 1980 | Meinke et al. |
| 4231372 | November 4, 1980 | Newton |
| 4232676 | November 11, 1980 | Herczog |
| 4237887 | December 9, 1980 | Gosner |
| 4237891 | December 9, 1980 | DuBose et al. |
| 4281373 | July 28, 1981 | Mabille |
| 4287557 | September 1, 1981 | Brehse |
| 4303073 | December 1, 1981 | Archibald |
| 4311154 | January 19, 1982 | Sterzer et al. |
| 4314559 | February 9, 1982 | Allen |
| 4321926 | March 30, 1982 | Roge |
| 4334539 | June 15, 1982 | Childs et al. |
| 4343308 | August 10, 1982 | Gross |
| 4372315 | February 8, 1983 | Shapiro et al. |
| 4376263 | March 8, 1983 | Pittroff et al. |
| 4378801 | April 5, 1983 | Oosten |
| 4384582 | May 24, 1983 | Watt |
| 4397314 | August 9, 1983 | Vaguine |
| 4407272 | October 4, 1983 | Yamaguchi |
| 4411266 | October 25, 1983 | Cosman |
| 4416276 | November 22, 1983 | Newton et al. |
| 4416277 | November 22, 1983 | Newton et al. |
| 4437464 | March 20, 1984 | Crow |
| 4452546 | June 5, 1984 | Hiltebrandt et al. |
| 4463759 | August 7, 1984 | Garito et al. |
| 4470414 | September 11, 1984 | Imagawa et al. |
| 4472661 | September 18, 1984 | Culver |
| 4474179 | October 2, 1984 | Koch |
| 4492231 | January 8, 1985 | Auth |
| 4492832 | January 8, 1985 | Taylor |
| 4494541 | January 22, 1985 | Archibald |
| 4514619 | April 30, 1985 | Kugelman |
| 4520818 | June 4, 1985 | Mickiewicz |
| 4559943 | December 24, 1985 | Bowers |
| 4565200 | January 21, 1986 | Cosman |
| 4566454 | January 28, 1986 | Mehl et al. |
| 4569345 | February 11, 1986 | Manes |
| 4576177 | March 18, 1986 | Webster, Jr. |
| 4582057 | April 15, 1986 | Auth et al. |
| 4590934 | May 27, 1986 | Malis et al. |
| 4608977 | September 2, 1986 | Brown |
| 4630218 | December 16, 1986 | Hurley |
| 4632109 | December 30, 1986 | Patterson |
| 4644955 | February 24, 1987 | Mioduski |
| 4646222 | February 24, 1987 | Okado et al. |
| 4651264 | March 17, 1987 | Shiao-Chung Hu |
| 4651280 | March 17, 1987 | Chang et al. |
| 4657015 | April 14, 1987 | Irnich |
| 4658815 | April 21, 1987 | Farin et al. |
| 4658819 | April 21, 1987 | Harris et al. |
| 4658820 | April 21, 1987 | Klicek |
| 4662383 | May 5, 1987 | Sogawa et al. |
| 4712559 | December 15, 1987 | Turner |
| 4727874 | March 1, 1988 | Bowers et al. |
| 4735204 | April 5, 1988 | Sussman et al. |
| 4739759 | April 26, 1988 | Rexroth et al. |
| 4741334 | May 3, 1988 | Irnich |
| 4754757 | July 5, 1988 | Feucht |
| 4805621 | February 21, 1989 | Heinze et al. |
| 4818954 | April 4, 1989 | Flachenecker et al. |
| 4827911 | May 9, 1989 | Broadwin et al. |
| 4827927 | May 9, 1989 | Newton |
| 4832024 | May 23, 1989 | Boussignac et al. |
| 4848335 | July 18, 1989 | Manes |
| 4848355 | July 18, 1989 | Nakamura et al. |
| 4860745 | August 29, 1989 | Farin et al. |
| 4862889 | September 5, 1989 | Feucht |
| 4880719 | November 14, 1989 | Murofushi et al. |
| 4890610 | January 2, 1990 | Kirwan et al. |
| 4903696 | February 27, 1990 | Stasz et al. |
| 4907589 | March 13, 1990 | Cosman |
| 4922210 | May 1, 1990 | Flachenecker et al. |
| 4931047 | June 5, 1990 | Broadwin et al. |
| 4931717 | June 5, 1990 | Gray et al. |
| 4938761 | July 3, 1990 | Ensslin |
| 4942313 | July 17, 1990 | Kinzel |
| 4961047 | October 2, 1990 | Carder |
| 4961435 | October 9, 1990 | Kitagawa et al. |
| 4966597 | October 30, 1990 | Cosman |
| RE33420 | November 6, 1990 | Sussman |
| 4969885 | November 13, 1990 | Farin |
| 4993430 | February 19, 1991 | Shimoyama et al. |
| 4995877 | February 26, 1991 | Ams et al. |
| 5015227 | May 14, 1991 | Broadwin et al. |
| 5019176 | May 28, 1991 | Brandhorst, Jr. |
| 5029588 | July 9, 1991 | Yock et al. |
| 5087257 | February 11, 1992 | Farin |
| 5103804 | April 14, 1992 | Abele et al. |
| 5108389 | April 28, 1992 | Cosmescu |
| 5108391 | April 28, 1992 | Flachenecker |
| 5122137 | June 16, 1992 | Lennox |
| 5133711 | July 28, 1992 | Hagen |
| 5151102 | September 29, 1992 | Kamiyama et al. |
| 5152762 | October 6, 1992 | McElhenney |
| 5157603 | October 20, 1992 | Scheller et al. |
| 5160334 | November 3, 1992 | Billings et al. |
| 5162217 | November 10, 1992 | Hartman |
| 5167658 | December 1, 1992 | Ensslin |
| 5190517 | March 2, 1993 | Zieve et al. |
| 5196008 | March 23, 1993 | Kuenecke |
| 5196009 | March 23, 1993 | Kirwan, Jr. |
| 5201900 | April 13, 1993 | Nardella |
| 5207691 | May 4, 1993 | Nardella |
| 5230623 | July 27, 1993 | Guthrie et al. |
| 5233515 | August 3, 1993 | Cosman |
| 5267994 | December 7, 1993 | Gentelia et al. |
| 5267997 | December 7, 1993 | Farin |
| 5281213 | January 25, 1994 | Milder et al. |
| 5300068 | April 5, 1994 | Rosar et al. |
| 5300070 | April 5, 1994 | Gentelia |
| 5318563 | June 7, 1994 | Malis et al. |
| 5323778 | June 28, 1994 | Kandarpa et al. |
| 5324283 | June 28, 1994 | Heckele |
| 5330518 | July 19, 1994 | Neilson et al. |
| 5334193 | August 2, 1994 | Nardella |
| 5341807 | August 30, 1994 | Nardella |
| 5342356 | August 30, 1994 | Ellman |
| 5342357 | August 30, 1994 | Nardella |
| 5342409 | August 30, 1994 | Mullett |
| 5348554 | September 20, 1994 | Imran et al. |
| 5370645 | December 6, 1994 | Klicek et al. |
| 5370672 | December 6, 1994 | Fowler et al. |
| 5370675 | December 6, 1994 | Edwards et al. |
| 5372596 | December 13, 1994 | Klicek et al. |
| 5383874 | January 24, 1995 | Jackson |
| 5383876 | January 24, 1995 | Nardella |
| 5383917 | January 24, 1995 | Desai et al. |
| 5385148 | January 31, 1995 | Lesh et al. |
| 5396062 | March 7, 1995 | Eisentraut et al. |
| 5400267 | March 21, 1995 | Denen et al. |
| 5403311 | April 4, 1995 | Abele et al. |
| 5403312 | April 4, 1995 | Yates et al. |
| 5409000 | April 25, 1995 | Imran |
| 5409006 | April 25, 1995 | Buchholtz et al. |
| 5409485 | April 25, 1995 | Suda |
| 5413573 | May 9, 1995 | Koivukangas |
| 5417719 | May 23, 1995 | Hull et al. |
| 5422567 | June 6, 1995 | Matsunaga |
| 5423808 | June 13, 1995 | Edwards et al. |
| 5423809 | June 13, 1995 | Klicek |
| 5423810 | June 13, 1995 | Goble et al. |
| 5430434 | July 4, 1995 | Lederer et al. |
| 5432459 | July 11, 1995 | Thompson |
| 5433739 | July 18, 1995 | Sluijter et al. |
| 5434398 | July 18, 1995 | Goldberg |
| 5436566 | July 25, 1995 | Thompson |
| 5438302 | August 1, 1995 | Goble |
| 5443463 | August 22, 1995 | Stern et al. |
| 5445635 | August 29, 1995 | Denen |
| 5451224 | September 19, 1995 | Goble et al. |
| 5458597 | October 17, 1995 | Edwards et al. |
| 5462521 | October 31, 1995 | Brucker et al. |
| 5472441 | December 5, 1995 | Edwards et al. |
| 5472443 | December 5, 1995 | Cordis et al. |
| 5478303 | December 26, 1995 | Folry-Nolan et al. |
| 5480399 | January 2, 1996 | Hebborn |
| 5483952 | January 16, 1996 | Aranyi |
| 5490850 | February 13, 1996 | Ellman et al. |
| 5496312 | March 5, 1996 | Klicek |
| 5496313 | March 5, 1996 | Gentelia et al. |
| 5500012 | March 19, 1996 | Brucker et al. |
| 5500616 | March 19, 1996 | Ochi |
| 5514129 | May 7, 1996 | Smith |
| 5520684 | May 28, 1996 | Imran |
| 5531774 | July 2, 1996 | Schulman et al. |
| 5534018 | July 9, 1996 | Wahlstrand et al. |
| 5536267 | July 16, 1996 | Edwards et al. |
| 5540681 | July 30, 1996 | Strul et al. |
| 5540683 | July 30, 1996 | Ichikawa |
| 5540684 | July 30, 1996 | Hassler, Jr. |
| 5540724 | July 30, 1996 | Cox |
| 5556396 | September 17, 1996 | Cohen et al. |
| 5558671 | September 24, 1996 | Yates |
| 5569242 | October 29, 1996 | Lax et al. |
| 5571147 | November 5, 1996 | Sluijter et al. |
| 5573533 | November 12, 1996 | Strul |
| 5588432 | December 31, 1996 | Crowley |
| 5594636 | January 14, 1997 | Schauder |
| 5596466 | January 21, 1997 | Ochi |
| 5599344 | February 4, 1997 | Paterson |
| 5599345 | February 4, 1997 | Edwards et al. |
| 5605150 | February 25, 1997 | Radons et al. |
| 5613966 | March 25, 1997 | Makower et al. |
| 5613996 | March 25, 1997 | Lindsay |
| 5625370 | April 29, 1997 | D'Hont |
| 5626575 | May 6, 1997 | Crenner |
| 5628745 | May 13, 1997 | Bek |
| 5643330 | July 1, 1997 | Holsheimer et al. |
| 5647869 | July 15, 1997 | Goble et al. |
| 5647871 | July 15, 1997 | Levine et al. |
| 5651780 | July 29, 1997 | Jackson et al. |
| 5658322 | August 19, 1997 | Fleming |
| 5660567 | August 26, 1997 | Nierlich et al. |
| 5688267 | November 18, 1997 | Panescu et al. |
| 5690692 | November 25, 1997 | Fleming |
| 5693042 | December 2, 1997 | Bioarski et al. |
| 5695494 | December 9, 1997 | Becker |
| 5696351 | December 9, 1997 | Benn et al. |
| 5702386 | December 30, 1997 | Stern et al. |
| 5702429 | December 30, 1997 | King |
| 5707369 | January 13, 1998 | Vaitekunas et al. |
| 5713896 | February 3, 1998 | Nardella |
| 5720744 | February 24, 1998 | Eggleston et al. |
| 5722975 | March 3, 1998 | Edwards et al. |
| 5733281 | March 31, 1998 | Nardella |
| 5749869 | May 12, 1998 | Lindenmeier et al. |
| 5749871 | May 12, 1998 | Hood et al. |
| 5755715 | May 26, 1998 | Stern |
| 5766165 | June 16, 1998 | Gentelia et al. |
| 5769847 | June 23, 1998 | Panescu |
| 5772659 | June 30, 1998 | Becker et al. |
| 5792138 | August 11, 1998 | Shipp |
| 5797802 | August 25, 1998 | Nowak |
| 5797902 | August 25, 1998 | Netherly |
| 5814092 | September 29, 1998 | King |
| 5817093 | October 6, 1998 | Williamson, IV et al. |
| 5820568 | October 13, 1998 | Willis |
| 5827271 | October 27, 1998 | Bussey et al. |
| 5830212 | November 3, 1998 | Cartmell et al. |
| 5836943 | November 17, 1998 | Miller, III |
| 5836990 | November 17, 1998 | Li |
| 5846236 | December 8, 1998 | Lindenmeier et al. |
| 5868737 | February 9, 1999 | Taylor et al. |
| 5868739 | February 9, 1999 | Lindenmeier et al. |
| 5868740 | February 9, 1999 | LeVeen et al. |
| 5871481 | February 16, 1999 | Kannenberg et al. |
| 5897552 | April 27, 1999 | Edwards et al. |
| 5908444 | June 1, 1999 | Azure |
| 5913882 | June 22, 1999 | King |
| 5921982 | July 13, 1999 | Lesh et al. |
| 5925070 | July 20, 1999 | King et al. |
| 5931836 | August 3, 1999 | Hatta et al. |
| 5938690 | August 17, 1999 | Law et al. |
| 5948007 | September 7, 1999 | Starkenbaum et al. |
| 5951545 | September 14, 1999 | Schilling et al. |
| 5951546 | September 14, 1999 | Lorentzen |
| 5954686 | September 21, 1999 | Garito et al. |
| 5954717 | September 21, 1999 | Behl et al. |
| 5961344 | October 5, 1999 | Rosales et al. |
| 5971980 | October 26, 1999 | Sherman |
| 5976128 | November 2, 1999 | Schilling et al. |
| 5983141 | November 9, 1999 | Sluijter et al. |
| 6010499 | January 4, 2000 | Cobb |
| 6014581 | January 11, 2000 | Whayne et al. |
| 6033399 | March 7, 2000 | Gines |
| 6044283 | March 28, 2000 | Fein et al. |
| 6053910 | April 25, 2000 | Fleenor |
| 6053912 | April 25, 2000 | Panescu et al. |
| 6056745 | May 2, 2000 | Panescu et al. |
| 6056746 | May 2, 2000 | Goble et al. |
| 6063075 | May 16, 2000 | Mihori |
| 6063078 | May 16, 2000 | Wittkampf |
| 6068627 | May 30, 2000 | Orszulak et al. |
| 6074386 | June 13, 2000 | Goble et al. |
| 6080149 | June 27, 2000 | Huang et al. |
| 6093186 | July 25, 2000 | Goble |
| RE36871 | September 12, 2000 | Epstein |
| 6113591 | September 5, 2000 | Whayne et al. |
| 6113596 | September 5, 2000 | Hooven |
| 6123702 | September 26, 2000 | Swanson et al. |
| 6132429 | October 17, 2000 | Baker |
| 6142992 | November 7, 2000 | Cheng et al. |
| 6162217 | December 19, 2000 | Kannenberg et al. |
| 6203541 | March 20, 2001 | Keppel |
| 6210403 | April 3, 2001 | Klicek |
| 6228080 | May 8, 2001 | Gines |
| 6228081 | May 8, 2001 | Goble |
| 6231569 | May 15, 2001 | Bek |
| 6235020 | May 22, 2001 | Cheng et al. |
| 6238387 | May 29, 2001 | Miller, III |
| 6238388 | May 29, 2001 | Ellman |
| 6241725 | June 5, 2001 | Cosman |
| 6245065 | June 12, 2001 | Panescu |
| 6246912 | June 12, 2001 | Sluijter et al. |
| 6251106 | June 26, 2001 | Becker et al. |
| 6258085 | July 10, 2001 | Eggleston |
| 6261285 | July 17, 2001 | Novak |
| 6261286 | July 17, 2001 | Goble et al. |
| 6273886 | August 14, 2001 | Edwards |
| 6275786 | August 14, 2001 | Daners |
| 6293941 | September 25, 2001 | Strul |
| 6293942 | September 25, 2001 | Goble et al. |
| 6306131 | October 23, 2001 | Hareyama et al. |
| 6306134 | October 23, 2001 | Goble et al. |
| 6309386 | October 30, 2001 | Bek |
| 6337998 | January 8, 2002 | Behl et al. |
| 6338657 | January 15, 2002 | Harper et al. |
| 6358245 | March 19, 2002 | Edwards |
| 6364877 | April 2, 2002 | Goble et al. |
| 6383183 | May 7, 2002 | Sekino et al. |
| 6398779 | June 4, 2002 | Buysse et al. |
| 6398781 | June 4, 2002 | Goble et al. |
| 6402741 | June 11, 2002 | Keppel et al. |
| 6402743 | June 11, 2002 | Orszulak et al. |
| 6416509 | July 9, 2002 | Goble et al. |
| 6436096 | August 20, 2002 | Hareyama |
| 6451015 | September 17, 2002 | Rittman, III et al. |
| 6458121 | October 1, 2002 | Rosenstock |
| 6464689 | October 15, 2002 | Qin |
| 6464696 | October 15, 2002 | Oyama |
| 6506189 | January 14, 2003 | Rittman, III et al. |
| 6508815 | January 21, 2003 | Strul |
| 6511476 | January 28, 2003 | Hareyama |
| 6547786 | April 15, 2003 | Goble |
| 6558376 | May 6, 2003 | Bishop |
| 6562037 | May 13, 2003 | Paton |
| 6565559 | May 20, 2003 | Eggleston |
| 6573248 | June 3, 2003 | Ramasamy et al. |
| 6575969 | June 10, 2003 | Rittman, III et al. |
| 6582427 | June 24, 2003 | Goble et al. |
| 6620157 | September 16, 2003 | Dabney et al. |
| 6623423 | September 23, 2003 | Sakurai |
| 6635057 | October 21, 2003 | Harano |
| 6648883 | November 18, 2003 | Francischelli |
| 6652514 | November 25, 2003 | Ellman |
| 6663623 | December 16, 2003 | Oyama et al. |
| 6663624 | December 16, 2003 | Edwards |
| 6666860 | December 23, 2003 | Takahashi |
| 6679875 | January 20, 2004 | Honda |
| 6682527 | January 27, 2004 | Strul |
| 6685700 | February 3, 2004 | Behl |
| 6685701 | February 3, 2004 | Orszulak et al. |
| 6692489 | February 17, 2004 | Heim |
| 6712813 | March 30, 2004 | Ellman |
| 6730080 | May 4, 2004 | Harano |
| 6733495 | May 11, 2004 | Bek |
| 6733498 | May 11, 2004 | Paton |
| 6740079 | May 25, 2004 | Eggers |
| 6740085 | May 25, 2004 | Hareyama |
| 6783523 | August 31, 2004 | Qin |
| 6790206 | September 14, 2004 | Panescu |
| 6796981 | September 28, 2004 | Wham |
| 6824539 | November 30, 2004 | Novak |
| 6830569 | December 14, 2004 | Thompson |
| 6843789 | January 18, 2005 | Goble |
| 6849073 | February 1, 2005 | Hoey |
| 6855141 | February 15, 2005 | Lovewell |
| 6855142 | February 15, 2005 | Harano |
| 6860881 | March 1, 2005 | Sturm |
| 6864686 | March 8, 2005 | Novak |
| 6875210 | April 5, 2005 | Refior |
| 6893435 | May 17, 2005 | Goble |
| 20010014804 | August 16, 2001 | Goble et al. |
| 20010031962 | October 18, 2001 | Eggleston |
| 20020035363 | March 21, 2002 | Edwards et al. |
| 20020035364 | March 21, 2002 | Schoenman et al. |
| 20020068932 | June 6, 2002 | Edwards |
| 20020193787 | December 19, 2002 | Qin |
| 20030004510 | January 2, 2003 | Wham et al. |
| 20030060818 | March 27, 2003 | Kannenberg |
| 20030078572 | April 24, 2003 | Pearson et al. |
| 20030139741 | July 24, 2003 | Goble et al. |
| 20030153908 | August 14, 2003 | Goble |
| 20030163123 | August 28, 2003 | Goble |
| 20030163124 | August 28, 2003 | Goble |
| 20030171745 | September 11, 2003 | Francischelli |
| 20030199863 | October 23, 2003 | Swanson |
| 20040002745 | January 1, 2004 | Flemming |
| 20040015163 | January 22, 2004 | Buysse et al. |
| 20040019347 | January 29, 2004 | Sakurai |
| 20040024395 | February 5, 2004 | Ellman |
| 20040030328 | February 12, 2004 | Eggers |
| 20040044339 | March 4, 2004 | Beller |
| 20040049179 | March 11, 2004 | Francischelli |
| 20040054365 | March 18, 2004 | Goble |
| 20040059323 | March 25, 2004 | Sturm et al. |
| 20040068304 | April 8, 2004 | Paton |
| 20040082946 | April 29, 2004 | Malis |
| 20040097912 | May 20, 2004 | Gonnering |
| 20040097914 | May 20, 2004 | Pantera |
| 20040097915 | May 20, 2004 | Refior |
| 20040116919 | June 17, 2004 | Heim |
| 20040133189 | July 8, 2004 | Sakurai |
| 20040138653 | July 15, 2004 | Dabney et al. |
| 20040138654 | July 15, 2004 | Goble |
| 20040147918 | July 29, 2004 | Keppel |
| 20040167508 | August 26, 2004 | Wham et al. |
| 20040172016 | September 2, 2004 | Bek |
| 20040193148 | September 30, 2004 | Wham et al. |
| 20040230189 | November 18, 2004 | Keppel |
| 20040243120 | December 2, 2004 | Orszulak et al. |
| 20040260279 | December 23, 2004 | Goble |
| 20050004564 | January 6, 2005 | Wham |
| 20050021020 | January 27, 2005 | Blaha et al. |
| 20050021022 | January 27, 2005 | Sturm et al. |
| 20050101951 | May 12, 2005 | Wham |
| 20050113818 | May 26, 2005 | Sartor |
| 20050113819 | May 26, 2005 | Wham |
| 20050149151 | July 7, 2005 | Orszulak |
| 20050182398 | August 18, 2005 | Paterson |
| 20050197659 | September 8, 2005 | Bahney |
| 20050203504 | September 15, 2005 | Wham et al. |
| 20060025760 | February 2, 2006 | Podhajsky |
| 179607 | March 1905 | DE |
| 1099658 | February 1961 | DE |
| 1139927 | November 1962 | DE |
| 1149832 | June 1963 | DE |
| 1439302 | January 1969 | DE |
| 2439587 | February 1975 | DE |
| 2455174 | May 1975 | DE |
| 2407559 | August 1975 | DE |
| 2602517 | July 1976 | DE |
| 2504280 | August 1976 | DE |
| 2540968 | March 1977 | DE |
| 2820908 | November 1978 | DE |
| 2803275 | August 1979 | DE |
| 2823291 | November 1979 | DE |
| 2946728 | May 1981 | DE |
| 3143421 | May 1982 | DE |
| 3045996 | July 1982 | DE |
| 3120102 | December 1982 | DE |
| 3510586 | October 1986 | DE |
| 3604823 | August 1987 | DE |
| 390937 | April 1989 | DE |
| 3904558 | August 1990 | DE |
| 3942998 | July 1991 | DE |
| 19717411 | November 1998 | DE |
| 246350 | November 1987 | EP |
| 310431 | April 1989 | EP |
| 325456 | July 1989 | EP |
| 336742 | October 1989 | EP |
| 390937 | October 1990 | EP |
| 556705 | August 1993 | EP |
| 608609 | August 1994 | EP |
| 836868 | April 1998 | EP |
| 878169 | November 1998 | EP |
| 1293171 | March 2003 | EP |
| 1275415 | October 1961 | FR |
| 1347865 | November 1963 | FR |
| 2313708 | December 1976 | FR |
| 2502935 | October 1982 | FR |
| 2517953 | June 1983 | FR |
| 2573301 | May 1986 | FR |
| 607850 | September 1948 | GB |
| 855459 | November 1960 | GB |
| 902775 | August 1962 | GB |
| 2164473 | March 1986 | GB |
| 2214430 | September 1989 | GB |
| 166452 | January 1965 | SU |
| 727201 | April 1980 | SU |
| WO92/06642 | April 1992 | WO |
| WO93/24066 | December 1993 | WO |
| WO94/24949 | November 1994 | WO |
| WO94/28809 | December 1994 | WO |
| WO95/09577 | April 1995 | WO |
| WO95/19148 | July 1995 | WO |
| WO96/02180 | February 1996 | WO |
| WO96/04860 | February 1996 | WO |
| WO96/08794 | March 1996 | WO |
| WO96/18349 | June 1996 | WO |
| WO96/29946 | October 1996 | WO |
| WO96/39914 | December 1996 | WO |
| WO97/06739 | February 1997 | WO |
| WO97/06740 | February 1997 | WO |
| WO97/06855 | February 1997 | WO |
| WO97/17029 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO02/11634 | February 2002 | WO |
| WO02/45589 | June 2002 | WO |
| WO02/47565 | June 2002 | WO |
| WO02/088128 | July 2002 | WO |
| WO03/092520 | November 2003 | WO |
| WO2004/028385 | April 2004 | WO |
| WO2004/098385 | April 2004 | WO |
| WO2005/046496 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO2005/048809 | June 2005 | WO |
| WO2005/050151 | June 2005 | WO |
| WO2005/060365 | July 2005 | WO |
- Alexander et al., “Magnetic Resonance Image-Directed Stereotactic Neurosurgery: Use of Image Fusion with Computerized Tomography to Enhance Spatial Accuracy” Journal Neurosurgery, 83; (1995) pp. 271-276.
- Anderson et al., “A Numerical Study of Rapid Heating for High Temperature Radio Frequency Hyperthermia” International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 35 (1994) pp. 297-307.
- Astrahan, “A Localized Current Field Hyperthermia System for Use with 192-Iridium Interstitial Implants” Medical Physics, 9 (3), May/Jun. 1982.
- Bergdahl et al., “Studies on Coagulator and the Development of an Automatic computerized Bipolar Coagulation” Journal of Neurosurgery 75:1, (Jul. 1991) pp. 148-151.
- Chicharo et al. “A Sliding Goertzel Algorith” Aug. 1996, pp. 283-297 Signal Processing, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam, NL vol. 52 No. 3.
- Cosman et al., “Methods of Making Nervous System Lesions” In William RH, Rengachary SS (eds): Neurosurgery, New York: McGraw-Hill, vol. 111, (1984), pp. 2490-2499.
- Cosman et al. “Radiofrequency Lesion Generation and Its Effect on Tissue Impedance” Applied Neurophysiology 51: (1988) pp. 230-242.
- Cosman et al., “Theoretical Aspects of Radiofrequency Lesions in the Dorsal Root Entry Zone” Neurosurgery 15:(1984) pp. 945-950.
- Geddes et al., “The Measurement of Physiologic Events by Electrical Impedence” Am. J. MI, Jan. Mar. 1964, pp. 16-27.
- Goldberg et al., “Tissue Ablation with Radiofrequency: Effect of Probe Size, Gauge, Duration, and Temperature on Lesion Volume” Acad Radio (1995) vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 399-404.
- Ogden Goertzel Alternative to the Fourier Transform: Jun. 1993 pp. 485-487 Electronics World; Reed Business Publishing, Sutton, Surrey, BG vol. 99, No. 9, 1687.
- Sugita et al., “Bipolar Coagulator with Automatic Thermocontrol” J. Neurosurg., vol. 41, Dec. 1944, pp. 777-779.
- Vallfors et al., “Automatically Controlled Bipolar Electrosoagulation-‘COA-COMP’” Neurosurgical Review 7:2-3 (1984) pp. 187-190.
- Wald et al., “Accidential Burns”, JAMA, Aug. 16, 1971, vol. 217, No. 7, pp. 916-921.
- International Search Report PCT/US03/37110 dated Jul. 25, 2005.
- International Search Report PCT/US03/37310 dated Aug. 13, 2004.
- International Search Report EP 04009964 dated Jul. 13, 2004.
- International Search Report EP 98300964.8 dated Dec. 4, 2000.
- International Search Report EP 04015981.6 dated Sep. 29, 2004.
- International Search Report EP 05014156.3 dated Dec. 28, 2005.
- International Search Report EP 05021944.3 dated Jan. 18, 2006.
- International Search Report EP 05022350.2 dated Jan. 18, 2006.
Type: Grant
Filed: May 8, 2003
Date of Patent: Jun 17, 2008
Assignee: Covidien AG (Neuhausen am Rheinfall)
Inventor: David Lee Gines (Ft. Collins, CO)
Primary Examiner: Michael Peffley
Application Number: 10/434,019
International Classification: A61B 18/18 (20060101);
