Method and apparatus for controlling loop filtering or post filtering in block based motion compensationed video coding

- Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha

Adjacent blocks are identified in an image. Coding parameters for the adjacent blocks are identified. Deblock filtering between the identified adjacent blocks is skipped if the coding parameters for the identified adjacent blocks are similar and not skipped if the coding parameters for the identified adjacent blocks are substantially different.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation Reissue Application of Reissue application Ser. No. 12/908,690 filed on Oct. 20, 2010 now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 43,628, which claims priority to application Ser. No. 11/105,729 filed in US, on Apr. 13, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,440,501 B2. The entire contents of all of the above applications is hereby incorporated by reference.

This application is a divisional based on prior U.S. Ser. No. 09/817,701, filed Mar. 26, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,931,063.

BACKGROUND

Block based motion compensated video coding is used in many video compression standards such as H.261, H.263, H263+, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, and H26L. The lossy compression process can create visual artifacts in the decoded images, referred to as image artifacts. Blocking artifacts occur along the block boundaries in an image and are caused by the coarse quantization of transform coefficients.

Image filtering techniques can be used to reduce artifacts in reconstructed images. Reconstructed images are the images produced after being inverse transformed and decoded. The rule of thumb in these techniques is that image edges should be preserved while the rest of the image is smoothed. Low pass filters are carefully chosen based on the characteristic of a particular pixel or set of pixels surrounding the image edges.

Non-correlated image pixels that extend across image block boundaries are specifically filtered to reduce blocking artifacts. However, this filtering can introduce blurring artifacts into the image. If there are little or no blocking artifacts between adjacent blocks, then low pass filtering needlessly incorporates blurring into the image while at the same time wasting processing resources.

The present invention addresses this and other problems associated with the prior art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Adjacent blocks are identified in an image. Coding parameters for the adjacent blocks are identified. Deblock filtering between the identified adjacent blocks is skipped if the coding parameters for the identified adjacent blocks are similar and not skipped if the coding parameters for the identified adjacent blocks are substantially different.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing how deblock filtering is selectively skipped according to similarities between adjacent image blocks.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing two adjacent image blocks having similar motion vectors.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing how transform coefficients are identified for one of the image blocks.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing how residual transform coefficients are compared between two adjacent image blocks.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing how the video image is encoded and decoded.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing how deblock filtering is selectively skipped in a codec.

FIG. 7 shows a table containing the results from selective deblock filter skipping.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In conventional filtering methods, filter processing only considers a single reconstructed image frame at a time. The motion-vector information available at both the encoder and decoder is not used. If two adjacent blocks share the same motion vector with respect to the same reference image frame, (for a multiple reference frames system) there may be no significant difference between the image residuals of each block. The block boundary of these two adjacent blocks may have been filtered in the reference frame and should therefore not be filtered again for the current frame. If a deblock filter is used without considering this motion-vector information, the conventional filtering process might filter the same boundary again and again from frame to frame. This unnecessary filtering not only causes unnecessary blurring but also results in extra filter computations.

FIG. 1 shows an image 12 that selectively filters block artifacts according to similarities between image blocks. The image 12 includes multiple image blocks 14 that are each individually encoded before being stored, transmitted, etc. The borders between some of the blocks 14 include blocking artifacts 18. Blocking artifacts are any image discontinuities between blocks 14 that may be created by the encoding process. A low pass filter is used to reduce the blocking artifacts that exist at the borders of adjacent image blocks.

For example, blocking artifacts 24 exist between blocks 20 and 22. A low pass filter is used at the border 26 between blocks 20 and 22 to remove or reduce the blocking artifacts 24. The low pass filter in one example selects a group of pixels 28 from both sides of the border 26. An average pixel value is derived from the group of pixels 28. Then each individual pixel is compared to the average pixel value. Any pixels in group 28 outside of a predetermined range of the average pixel value is then replaced with the average pixel value.

As described above, if there are little or no blocking artifacts 24 between the adjacent pixels, then the group of pixels 28 may be needlessly filtered causing blurring in the image and wasting processing resources. A skip mode filtering scheme uses the motion estimation and compensation information for adjacent image blocks. If the motion estimation and compensation information is similar, deblock filtering is skipped. This not only avoids unnecessary image blurring but also significantly reduces the required number of filtering operations.

For example, it is determined during the encoding process that adjacent image blocks 30 and 32 have similar coding parameters. Accordingly, deblock filtering is skipped for the groups of pixels 34 that extend across the border 31 between adjacent blocks 30 and 32. Skip mode filtering can be used for any horizontal or vertical boundary between any adjacent blocks in image 12.

FIG. 2 shows reference frames 42 and 48 and a current frame 40 that is currently being encoded or decoded. Coding parameters for blocks 44 and 46 are compared to determine whether deblock filtering should be skipped between the two adjacent blocks 44 and 46. One encoding parameter that is compared is the Motion Vectors (MV) for the blocks 44 and 46.

The motion vector MV1 points from block 44 in current image frame 40 to an associated block 44′ in the reference image 42. The motion vector MV2 points from block 46 in current image frame 40 to an associated block 46′ in reference frame 42. Skip mode filtering checks to see if the motion vectors MV1 and MV2 point to adjacent blocks in the same reference frame 42. If the motion vectors point to adjacent blocks in the reference frame (MV1=MV2), then deblock filtering is skipped. This motion vector information may be used along with other coding information to decide whether to skip deblock filtering between the two image blocks 44 and 46.

More than one reference frame may be used during the encoding and decoding process. For example, there may be another reference frame 48. The adjacent blocks 44 and 46 may have motion vectors pointing to different reference frames. In one embodiment, the decision to skip deblock filtering depends on whether the motion vectors for the two adjacent blocks point to the same reference frame. For example, image block 44 may have a motion vector 49 pointing to reference frame 48 and image block 46 may have the motion vector MV2 pointing to reference frame 42. Deblock filtering is not skipped in this example because the motion vectors 49 and MV2 point to different reference frames.

FIG. 3 shows another coding parameter that may be used to decide whether or not to skip deblock filtering. The image block 44 from image frame 40 is compared with reference block 44′ from the reference frame 42 pointed to by the motion vector MV1 as previously shown in FIG. 2. A residual block 44″ is output from the comparison between image block 44 and reference block 44′. A transform 50 is performed on the residual block 44″ creating a transformed block 44′″ of transform coefficients. In one example, the transform 50 is a Discrete Cosine Transform. The transformed block 44′″ includes a D.C. component 52 and A.C. components 53.

The D.C. component 52 refers to a lowest frequency transform coefficient in image block 44. For example, the coefficient that represents the average energy in the image block 44. The A.C. components 53 refer to the transform coefficients that represent the higher frequency components in the image block 44. For example, the transform coefficients that represent the large energy differences between pixels in the image block 44.

FIG. 4 shows the transformed residual blocks 44′″ and 46′″. The D.C. components 52 from the two transformed blocks 44′″ and 46′″ are compared in processor 54. If the D.C. components are the same or within some range of each other, the processor 54 notifies a deblock filter operation 56 to skip deblock filtering between the border of the two adjacent blocks 44 and 46. If the D.C. components 52 are not similar, then no skip notification is initiated and the border between blocks 44 and 46 is deblock filtered.

In one embodiment, skip mode filtering is incorporated into the Telecommunications Sector of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) proposed H.26L encoding scheme. The H.26L scheme only uses 4×4 integer Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) blocks. Here, only the D.C. component of the two adjacent blocks may be checked. However some limited low frequency A.C. coefficients could also be checked when the image blocks are bigger sizes, such as 8×8 or 16×16 blocks. For example, the upper D.C. component 52 and the three lower frequency A.C. transform coefficients 53 for block 44′″ may be compared with the upper D.C. component 52 and three lower frequency A.C. transform coefficients 53 for block 46′″. Different combinations of D.C. and/or low frequency A.C. transform coefficients can be used to identify the relative similarity between the two adjacent blocks 44 and 46.

The processor 54 can also receive other coding parameters 55 that are generated during the coding process. These coding parameters include the motion vectors and reference frame information for the adjacent blocks 44 and 46 as described above. The processor 54 uses all of these coding parameters to determine whether or not to skip deblock filtering between adjacent image blocks 44 and 46. Other encoding and transform functions performed on the image may be carried out in the same processor 54 or in a different processing circuit. In the case where all or most of the coding is done in the same processor, the skip mode is simply enabled by setting a skip parameter in the filtering routine.

FIG. 5 shows how skip mode filtering is used in a block-based motion-compensated Coder-Decoder (Codec) 60. The codec 60 is used for inter-frame coding. An input video block from the current frame is fed from box 62 into a comparator 64. The output of a frame buffering box 80 generates a reference block 81 according to the estimated motion vector (and possible reference frame number). The difference between the input video block and the reference block 81 is transformed in box 66 and then quantized in box 68. The quantized transform block is encoded by a Variable Length Coder (VLC) in box 70 and then transmitted, stored, etc.

The encoding section of the codec 60 reconstructs the transformed and quantized image by first Inverse Quantizing (IQ) the transformed image in box 72. The inverse quantized image is then inverse transformed in box 74 to generate a reconstructed residual image. This reconstructed residual block is then added in box 76 to the reference block 81 to generate a reconstructed image block. Generally the reconstructed image is loop filtered in box 78 to reduce blocking artifacts caused by the quantization and transform process. The filtered image is then buffered in box 80 to form reference frames. The frame buffering in box 80 uses the reconstructed reference frames for motion estimation and compensation. The reference block 81 is compared to the input video block in comparator 64. An encoded image is output at node 71 from the encoding section and is then either stored or transmitted.

In a decoder portion of the codec 60, a variable length decoder (VLD) decodes the encoded image in box 82. The decoded image is inverse quantized in box 84 and inverse transformed in box 86. The reconstructed residual image from box 86 is added in the summing box 88 to the reference block 91 before being loop filtered in box 90 to reduce blocking artifacts and buffered in box 92 as reference frames. The reference block 91 is generated from box 92 according to the received motion vector information. The loop filtered output from box 90 can optionally be post filtered in box 94 to further reduce image artifacts before being displayed as a video image in box 96. The skip mode filtering scheme can be performed in any combination of the filtering functions in boxes 78, 90 and 94.

The motion estimation and compensation information available during video coding are used to determine when to skip deblock filtering in boxes 78, 90 and/or 94. Since these coding parameters are already generated during the encoding and decoding process, there are no additional coding parameters that have to be generated or transmitted specially for skip mode filtering.

FIG. 6 shows is further detail how skip mode filtering is used in the filters 78, 90, and/or 94 in the encoder and decoder in FIG. 5. The interblock boundary between any two adjacent blocks “j” and “k” is first identified in box 100. The two blocks may be horizontally or vertically adjacent in the image frame. Decision box 102 compares the motion vector mv(j) for block j with the motion vector mv(k) for block k. It is first determined whether the two adjacent blocks j and k have the same motion vector pointing to the same reference frame. In other words, the motion vectors for the adjacent blocks point to adjacent blocks (mv(j)=mv(k)) in the same reference frame (ref(j)=ref(k)).

It is then determined whether the residual coefficients for the two adjacent blocks are similar. If there is no significant difference between the image residuals of the adjacent blocks, for example, the two blocks j and k have the same of similar D.C. component (dc(j)=dc(k)), then the deblock filtering process in box 104 is skipped. Skip mode filtering then moves to the next interblock boundary in box 106 and conducts the next comparison in decision box 102. Skip mode filtering can be performed for both horizontally adjacent blocks and vertically adjacent blocks.

In one embodiment, only the reference frame and motion vector information for the adjacent image blocks are used to determine block skipping. In another embodiment, only the D.C. and/or A.C. residual coefficients are used to determine block skipping. In another embodiment, the motion vector, reference frame and residual coefficients are all used to determine block skipping.

The skip mode filtering scheme can be applied to spatially sub-sampled chrominance channels. For example in a case with 4:2:0 color format sequences, skip mode filtering for block boundaries may only rely on the equality of motion vectors and D.C. components for the luminance component of the image. If the motion vectors and the D.C. components are the same, deblock filtering is skipped for both the luminance and chrominance components of the adjacent image blocks. In another embodiment, the motion vectors and the D.C. components are considered separately for each luminance and chrominance component of the adjacent blocks. In this case, a luminance or chrominance component for adjacent blocks may be deblock filtered while the other luminance or chrominance components for the same adjacent blocks are not deblock filtered.

FIG. 7 includes a table 110 showing the results of skip mode filtering using a ITU-TH.26L Testing Model-Long TML5.0. Table 110 compares the results of the TML filtering standard with skip mode filtering as described above. Encoding results using skip mode filtering are shown in table 110 under the heading SLA.

There were four images that were tested, Akiyo_cif for 300 frames at 30 Frames Per Second (fps), Foreman_cif for 300 frames at 30 fps, Foreman_qcif for 100 frames at 10 fps, and Tempete_cif for 260 frames at 30 fps. Quantization Parameters (QP) of 25 and 30 were used. The results show no significant visual quality degradation with the skip mode filtering. The Picture Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) for the images stays approximately the same for the luminance Y and chrominance U and V channels. However, skip mode filtering provides time savings of 40-70 percent.

Skip mode filtering can be used with any system that encodes or decodes multiple image frames. For example, DVD players, video recorders, or any system that transmits image data over a communications channel, such as over television channels or over the Internet.

The skip mode filtering described above can be implemented with dedicated processor systems, micro controllers, programmable logic devices, or microprocessors that perform some or all of the operations. Some of the operations described above may be implemented in software and other operations may be implemented in hardware.

For the sake of convenience, the operations are described as various interconnected functional blocks or distinct software modules. This is not necessary, however, and there may be cases where these functional blocks or modules are equivalently aggregated into a single logic device, program or operation with unclear boundaries. In any event, the functional blocks and software modules or described features can be implemented by themselves, or in combination with other operations in either hardware or software.

Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention in a preferred embodiment thereof, it should be apparent that the invention may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. Claim is made to all modifications and variation coming within the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims

1. A method for encoding an image, comprising:

identifying spatially adjacent blocks in a same frame of the image;
identifying transform coefficients for the spatially adjacent blocks in the same frame of the image;
comparing the transform coefficients between the spatially adjacent blocks in the same frame of the image;
skipping deblock filtering for removing image residuals caused by encoding the image when the comparison indicates that the spatially adjacent blocks in the same frame of the image have same or similar transform coefficients; and
deblock filtering to remove image residuals between the identified spatially adjacent blocks when the comparison between the transform coefficients for the identified spatially adjacent blocks in the same frame of the image indicate that the spatially adjacent blocks do not have the same or similar transform coefficients.

2. A method according to claim 1 including:

identifying D.C. components in the transform coefficients;
comparing the D.C. components for the spatially adjacent blocks with each other; and
skipping deblock filtering between the spatially adjacent blocks when the D.C. components for the compared spatially adjacent blocks have same or similar values relative to each other.

3. A method according to claim 1 including:

identifying both D.C. and A.C. components in the transform coefficients;
comparing the D.C. components for adjacent blocks and A.C. components for adjacent blocks; and
skipping deblock filtering between the adjacent blocks when both the D.C. components are the same or similar and the A.C. components are the same or similar.

4. A method according to claim 1 including controlling deblock filtering for a loop filter in an image coder.

5. A method according to claim 1 including controlling deblock filtering in one or both of a loop filter and a post filter in an image decoder.

6. A method according to claim 1 including:

identifying similarities between coding parameters in a luminance channel of the adjacent blocks; and
controlling deblock filtering for both the luminance channel and a chrominance channel in the image according to identified similarities in the luminance channel.

7. A method according to claim 1 including selectively skipping deblock filtering in any one of a H.261, H.263, H263+, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, or H26L encoding standard according to encoding parameter similarities between adjacent image blocks.

8. An encoder for encoding an image, comprising: a processor adapted to:

compare blocks in a same image frame with reference frames;
transform a result of the comparison between the reference frames and the blocks in the image frame into transformed blocks having transform coefficients;
compare are the similarities between the transform coefficients for spatially adjacent transformed blocks within the same image frame; and
skipping deblock filtering between spatially adjacent transformed blocks in the image that have the same or similar transform coefficients.

9. An encoder according to claim 8 wherein the processor is adapted to

identify motion vectors and associated reference frames for the adjacent blocks and skip deblock filtering between the spatially adjacent blocks according to the identified motion vectors and reference frames.

10. An encoder according to claim 8 wherein the processor is adapted to

identify residual coefficients for the spatially adjacent blocks and skip deblock filtering according to the identified residual coefficients.

11. An encoder according to claim 8 wherein the processor is adapted to skip deblock filtering according to both D.C. and A.C. components in the residual coefficients.

12. A decoder for decoding an encoded image, comprising:

a processor adapted to identify spatially adjacent blocks in the encoded image;
identify coding parameters including D.C. coefficients for the spatially adjacent blocks within a same encoded image frame;
compare the identified D.C. coefficients between the identified spatially adjacent blocks; and
enable or disable filtering of blocking artifacts between the spatially adjacent blocks according to the comparison of the D.C. coefficients between the spatially adjacent blocks within the same encoded image frame.

13. A decoder according to claim 12 wherein the processor is adapted to identify both D.C. coefficients and A.C. coefficients for the spatially adjacent blocks within a same encoded image frame;

compare the identified D.C. coefficients between the identified spatially adjacent blocks and corn are the identified A.C. coefficients between the identified spatially adjacent blocks; and
enable or disable filtering of blocking artifacts between the spatially adjacent blocks according to the comparison of the D.C. coefficients between the adjacent blocks within the same encoded image frame and according to the comparison of the A.C. coefficients between the adjacent blocks within the same encoded image frame.

14. A decoder according to claim 12 wherein the processor is adapted to

identify residual coefficients for the spatially adjacent blocks and skip deblock filtering between the spatially adjacent blocks according to the identified residual coefficients.

15. A decoder according to claim 12 wherein the processor is adapted to

inverse transform the encoded image, compare blocks in the inverse transformed encoded image with reference frames, generate a reconstructed image from the comparison between the inverse transformed encoded image and the reference frame, and skip deblock filtering between spatially adjacent blocks in the reconstructed image according to the coding parameters for the spatially adjacent blocks.

16. A decoder according to claim 15 wherein the coding parameters include transform coefficients, motion vectors, and reference frame information and the processor skips deblock filtering when the transform coefficients, motion vectors, and reference frame information for the spatially adjacent blocks are the same or similar.

17. A decoder according to claim 12 wherein the processor is adapted to

skip deblock filtering in one or both of a loop filter and a post filter.

18. An apparatus for decoding an image comprising:

a storing means for storing two or more reference images for motion compensation prediction of an image to be decoded;
a motion compensation prediction means for deriving a reference block from the reference image according to a motion vector;
a decoding means for obtaining an image by decoding the reference blocks and decoded difference blocks;
a filtering means for de-block filtering a plurality of borders owned by a block in the reference image; and
a judging means for judging whether de-block filtering for each of the borders is performed, wherein
the judging means estimates whether a first motion vector and a second motion vector are similar to each other, which are respectively used in process of decoding a first block and a second block adjacent to the border, estimates whether the numbers of a first reference image and a second reference image are identical with each other, which are respectively used in process of decoding a first block and a second block,
performs de-block filtering the border on the condition that the motion vectors are not similar to each other or the numbers of the reference images are different from each other, and
does not perform de-block filtering the border on the condition that the motion vectors are similar to each other and the numbers of the reference images are identical with each other.

19. A method for decoding an image comprising steps of:

storing two or more reference images for motion compensation prediction of an image to be decoded;
deriving a reference block from the reference image according to a motion vector;
obtaining an image by decoding the reference blocks and decoded difference blocks;
de-block filtering a plurality of borders owned by a block in the reference image; and
judging whether de-block filtering for each of the borders is performed, wherein
the judging step estimates whether a first motion vector and a second motion vector are similar to each other, which are respectively used in process of decoding a first block and a second block adjacent to the border, estimates whether the numbers of a first reference image and a second reference image are identical with each other, which are respectively used in process of decoding a first block and a second block,
performs de-block filtering the border on the condition that the motion vectors are not similar to each other or the numbers of the reference images are different from each other, and
does not perform de-block filtering the border on the condition that the motion vectors are similar to each other and the numbers of the reference images are identical with each other.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
5072293 December 10, 1991 De Haan et al.
5126841 June 30, 1992 Tanaka et al.
5329318 July 12, 1994 Keith
5367385 November 22, 1994 Yuan
5473384 December 5, 1995 Jayant et al.
5479211 December 26, 1995 Fukuda
5565921 October 15, 1996 Sasaki et al.
5654759 August 5, 1997 Augenbraun et al.
5731840 March 24, 1998 Kikuchi et al.
5737019 April 7, 1998 Kim
5768433 June 16, 1998 Bolton
5787204 July 28, 1998 Fukuda
5852682 December 22, 1998 Kim
5933542 August 3, 1999 Chang et al.
5949908 September 7, 1999 Sugahara
5974196 October 26, 1999 Chang et al.
5987184 November 16, 1999 Kweon et al.
6041145 March 21, 2000 Hayashi et al.
6044177 March 28, 2000 Herley
6057884 May 2, 2000 Chen et al.
6104434 August 15, 2000 Nakagawa et al.
6115503 September 5, 2000 Kaup
6144700 November 7, 2000 Kim
6160503 December 12, 2000 Andrews et al.
6167157 December 26, 2000 Sugahara
6263026 July 17, 2001 Je-Chang et al.
6424676 July 23, 2002 Kono et al.
6618445 September 9, 2003 Peng et al.
6665346 December 16, 2003 Lee et al.
6748113 June 8, 2004 Kondo et al.
6931063 August 16, 2005 Sun et al.
7440501 October 21, 2008 Sun et al.
7627034 December 1, 2009 Park et al.
RE43628 September 4, 2012 Sun et al.
20010017944 August 30, 2001 Kalevo et al.
20040101059 May 27, 2004 Joch et al.
20040190626 September 30, 2004 Sun et al.
20050002646 January 6, 2005 Sato
20060146941 July 6, 2006 Cha et al.
20070160133 July 12, 2007 Bao et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2 374 523 July 2001 CA
0 777 388 December 1995 EP
0 714 209 May 1996 EP
0 777 388 April 1997 EP
0 777 388 June 1997 EP
0 838 955 July 1997 EP
0 838 955 April 1998 EP
05-227518 September 1993 JP
08-205178 August 1996 JP
8-265762 October 1996 JP
10-93966 April 1998 JP
10-191351 July 1998 JP
11-18085 January 1999 JP
11-275584 October 1999 JP
2000-59769 February 2000 JP
2000-299864 October 2000 JP
2001-94996 April 2001 JP
2001-204029 July 2001 JP
2001-224031 August 2001 JP
2004-328634 November 2004 JP
2005-503737 February 2005 JP
2006-191576 July 2006 JP
1997-0078645 December 1997 KR
00/14685 March 2000 WO
Other references
  • “Working Draft 1.0 of 14496-10: 200x/AMD1 Scalable Video Coding” ITU Study Group 16—Video Coding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG/ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/ WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q6), No. N6901, Feb. 5, 2005 (Feb. 5, 2005), XP030013621.
  • “Working Draft 4 of ISO/IEC 14496-10: 200x/Amd.3 Scalable Video Coding” ITU Study Group 16—Video Coding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q6), No. N7555. Oct. 28, 2005, (Oct. 28, 2005), XP030014100 p. 118-p. 119.
  • “Index of /av-arch/video-site/0109—San”, Sep. 4, 2001, pp. 1-4, XP002606104, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://ftp.itu3.int/av-arch/video-site/0109—San [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2005].
  • Bjontegaard G.: “H.26L Test Model Long Term No. 7 (TML-7) draft 0” ITU—Telecommunications Standardization Sector, Study Group 16, Video Coding Experts Group; Document VCEG-M81, May 3, 2001; Austin Texas, USA Apr. 2-4, 2001.
  • Derviaux C et al.: “Blocking Artifact Reduction of DCT Coded Image Sequences Using a Visually Adaptive Postprocessing” Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Lausanne, Sep. 16-19, 1996, New York, IEEE, US, vol. 1, Sep. 16, 1996, pp. 5-8.
  • European Search Report for EP02006295.6, Apr. 28, 2005.
  • European Search Report for EP02798822.9, Oct. 17, 2005.
  • European Search Report for EP05016012.6, Oct. 7, 2005.
  • European Search Report for EP06019135.0, Aug. 30, 2007.
  • European Search Report for EP06736425.7, Sep. 1, 2010.
  • Francois E. et al: “Extended Spatial Scalability” International Organisation for Standardisation Organisation International De Normalisation, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Coding of Moving Pictures and Audio, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, MPEG2005/M11669, Jan. 2005 Hong Kong.
  • Han W. et al.: “Response of SVC CE-3: Interlayer prediction” ITU Study Group 16—Video Coding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q6), No. M11585, Jan. 11, 2005 (Jan. 11, 2005), XP030040330.
  • He Y; Wu F; Li S; Zhong 7; Yang S: “H.26L—Based Fine Granularity Scalable Video Coding” Proceedings—IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 4, 2002, pp. IV-548-IV-551, XP002593544 ISSN:0271-4310.
  • International Search Report for PCT/JP02/09306, Dec. 17, 2002.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2006/007105, Nov. 23, 2007.
  • Kim C. et al.: “Simplified Loop Filter for Mobile Service (VCEG-M43)” ITU—Telecommunication Standardization Sector Study Group 16, VCEG-M43, Austin, Texas, Apr. 2-4, 2001, generated Mar. 28, 2001.
  • Kim S. D. et al.: “A Deblocking Filter with Two Separate Modes in Block-Based Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999; pp. 156-160.
  • Lee Y. L. et al.: “Loop-filtering and post-filtering for low bit-rates moving picture coding” Image Processing, 1999. ICIP 99. Proceedings, 1999 International Conference on Kobe, Japan Oct. 24-28, 1999, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, US, vol. 1, Oct. 24, 1999.
  • List P. et al. “H.26L Test Model Long Term No. 8.40 (TML-8.4), Software Module: loop-filter.c” ITU—Telecommunications Standardization Sector Study Group 16, VCEG, [Online] Aug. 29, 2001, pp. 1-3, XP002440062, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
  • List P. et al.: “Adaptive Deblocking Filter” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US LINKD-DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT. 2003.815175, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1, 2003 (Jul. 1, 2003), pp. 614-619, XP01122109.
  • List P.: “Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Loop Filter Improvement (VCEG-N08)” ITU Telecommunications Standardization Sector Study Group 16, VCEG-N008, [Online] Sep. 4, 2001, pp. 1-3, XP002347724 Santa Barbara, CA, USA, generated Aug. 8, 2001.
  • Meier T. et al.: “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts in Image and Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 3, Apr. 1999; pp. 490-499.
  • Park H. W. et al.: “A Postprocessing Method for Reducing Quantization Effects in Low Bit-Rate Moving Picture Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Inc. New York, US, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999 (Feb. 1999), pp. 161-171.
  • Suehring, Karsten, “Release of reference software TML 8.4”, tml84changes.txt, Sep. 3, 2001, XP002606232, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http//wftp3.itu.int/av-arch/video-site/h26L/older—tml/tml84changes.txt [retrieved on Oct. 20, 2010].
  • Sun S. et al.: “Extended Spatial Scalability with Picture-Level Adaptation,” ITU Study Group 16—Video Coding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q6), No. JVT-O008, Apr. 13, 2005 (Apr. 13, 2005), XP030005956.
  • Sun S. et al.: “Improved TML Loop Filter with Lower Complexity (VCEG-N17)” ITU Telecommunications Standardization Sector Study Group 16, VCEG-N17, [Online] Sep. 24, 2001, pp. 1-8, XP002347725 Santa Barbara, CA USA, generated Aug. 14, 2001.
  • Sun S. et al.: “Loop Filter with Skip Mode (VCEG-M20)” ITU Telecommunications Standardization Sector Study Group 16, VCEG-M20, Apr. 2-4, 2001, pp. 1-8, XP002321426 Austin, Texas, USA, sections 1 + 2 with figure 1, generated Mar. 27, 2001.
  • Sun S.:“CE2 Part 2: Deblocking filter for I—BL Blocks Spatial Scalable Video Coding”, ITU Study Group 16—Video Coding Experts Group—ISO/IEC MPEG & ITU-T VCEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 and ITU-T SG16 Q6), No. JVT-P013r1, Jul. 28, 2005 (Jul. 28, 2005), XP030006055.
  • Turkowski K.: “Filters for Common Resampling Tasks,” Graphics Gems I, Academic Pres, Apple Computer, Apr. 1990.
  • Video & JVT, Description of Core Experiments in SVC, International Organisation for Standardisation, Organisation International De Normalisation, Coding of Moving Pictures and Audio, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11/N6898, Hong Kong, Jan. 2005.
  • Lee, Y.L. et al., “Loop-filtering and Post-filtering for Low Bit-rates Moving Picture Coding”, IEEE, pp. 94-98, 1999.
  • Bjontegaard, Gisle (Editor), “H.26L Test Model Long Term No. 6 (TML-6) draft0”, ITU Telecommunications Standardization Sector, Study Group 16, Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG), 12TH meeting, Eibsee, Germany, Jan. 9-12, 2001.
  • European Search Report for European Application No. EP 02 00 6295, dated Apr. 20, 2005.
  • Shijun Sun et al, “Loop Filter with Skip mode (VCEG-M20)”, ITU Telecommunications Standardization Sector Study Group 16, XX, XX vol., VCEG-M20, Mar. 27, 2001, pp. 1/8, XP002321426, p. 1, paragraph 2, Austin.
  • Peter List, “Report of the AD Hoc Committee on Loop Filter Improvement (VCEG-N08)” ITE Telecommunications Standardization Sector Study Group 16, XX, XX, Sep. 4, 2001, pp. 1-3, XP 002347724, p. 2, paragraph 4.5, Santa Barbara.
Patent History
Patent number: RE44497
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 13, 2012
Date of Patent: Sep 17, 2013
Assignee: Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha (Osaka)
Inventors: Shijun Sun (Redmond, WA), Shawmin Lei (Hsinchu)
Primary Examiner: Shawn An
Application Number: 13/495,944