Vertebral body placement and method for spanning a space formed upon removal of a vertebral body

- Simplify Medical Pty Ltd

A vertebral body replacement includes first and second end plates, and a compliant connector section between the end plates having one or more helical cuts to provide limited compliance between the end plates. The compliant connector section can be provided in a separate spacer that fits between the end plates or directly in one or more of the end plates. The adjoining end plate surfaces, and/or adjoining surfaces of the spacer, include a rotational interlock to inhibit rotational motion between the surfaces and allow a modular stacking assembly of the vertebral body replacement to accommodate a wide range of patients.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/981,665 filed Oct. 22, 2007, entitled “Method and Spacer Device Spanning Space Formed Upon Removal of an Intervertebral Disc,” the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to medical devices and methods. More specifically, the invention relates to vertebral body replacements and methods of spanning a space formed upon removal of an intervertebral disc.

Back pain takes an enormous toll on the health and productivity of people around the world. According to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, approximately 80 percent of Americans will experience back pain at some time in their life. In the year 2000, approximately 26 million visits were made to physicians' offices due to back problems in the United States. On any one day, it is estimated that 5% of the working population in America is disabled by back pain.

One common cause of back pain is injury, degeneration and/or dysfunction of one or more intervertebral discs. Intervertebral discs are the soft tissue structures located between each of the thirty-three vertebral bones that make up the vertebral (spinal) column. Essentially, the discs allow the vertebrae to move relative to one another. The vertebral column and discs are vital anatomical structures, in that they form a central axis that supports the head and torso, allow for movement of the back, and protect the spinal cord, which passes through the vertebrae in proximity to the discs.

Another form of spinal injury involves injury or deformity of the vertebra themselves. When one or more vertebrae is fracture or deformed by tumor or other causes and results in pain and discomfort, surgery is often required. Traditionally, surgical procedures for vertebral replacement have involved removal of the vertebra and fusion of the two vertebrae above and below the missing vertebra. It is necessary to replace the removed vertebra to maintain spacing of adjacent vertebrae. Oftentimes, pins, rods, screws, cages and/or the like are inserted between the vertebrae to act as support structures to hold the vertebrae and graft material in place while they permanently fuse together. These vertebral body replacement procedures generally focus on rigidly fusing the adjacent vertebrae and preventing motion.

However, it would be desirable to achieve immobilization of the vertebrae adjacent a removed vertebral body and maintain spacing between the adjacent vertebrae without the complete rigidity of traditional interbody fusion.

Another problem associated with the typical vertebral body replacement procedure is the subsidence of the cage into the vertebral body. The typical vertebral body replacement cage is formed with a large percentage of open space to allow the bone to grow through and form the bridging bone which immobilizes the vertebrae. However, the large amount of open space means that the load on each segment of the cage is significantly higher than if the cage surface area was larger. This results in the cage subsiding or sinking into the bone over time and allows the space between the vertebrae to collapse.

Therefore, a need exists for improved vertebral body replacement and method for spanning a space and maintaining spacing between two vertebrae after removal of an intervertebral body. Such improved method and intervertebral body replacement would avoid the need for growth of bridging bone between the remaining vertebrae.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention provide a vertebral body replacement with compliance or shock absorption and methods of spanning a space formed upon removal of vertebral body.

In accordance with one of numerous aspects of the present invention, a vertebral body replacement for replacing at least one vertebral body between remaining upper and lower vertebral bodies, the vertebral body replacement comprises a first end plate having an upper surface configured to engage against a surface of the upper remaining vertebral body, and a lower surface opposite the upper surface spanning the first end plate, a second end plate having a lower surface configured to engage against a surface of the lower remaining vertebral body, and a compliant connector section between the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate lower surface, the compliant connector section comprising at least one helical cut configured and arranged to permit limited motion between the first end plate and the second end plate.

In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of replacing at least one vertebral body comprises removing said at least one vertebral body between two remaining vertebral bodies, placing a vertebral body replacement between said two remaining vertebral bodies, the vertebral body replacement comprising first and second end plates and a compliant connector section between the first and second end plates, the compliant connector section having at least one helical cut and configured and arranged to limit motion to less than 10 degrees between said remaining vertebral bodies, and maintaining the space between the two remaining vertebral bodies with the vertebral body replacement.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a vertebral body replacement according to one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 1A is an exploded, perspective view of the vertebral body replacement of FIG. 1;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a vertebral body replacement according to a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a vertebral body replacement according to a third exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Various embodiments of the present invention generally provide for a vertebral body replacement having upper and lower plates or surfaces connected by a central connector portion which provides some limited amount of axial compliance and/or rotational motion between the upper and lower plates or surfaces. The compliant vertebral body replacement according to the present invention can maintain disc height and prevent subsidence with a large surface area while improving outcomes by allowing some limited motion and providing improved fixation. The compliance of the vertebral body replacement also functions to reduce loading on the interface between the bone and vertebral body replacement.

One example of a vertebral body replacement 10 for replacement of a vertebral body and maintaining disc height between two adjacent vertebral discs is shown in FIG. 1. The body 10 includes at least one end plate 20 having a vertebral body contacting surface 24, a second end plate or body end 30 opposite the end plate 20, and a compliant connector or connector section 32 interposed between, or interconnecting, the two ends 20, 30. As will be described below, some limited rotational and axial motion may be provided between the two plates or sections 20, 30 to reduce loading on the interface between the adjacent vertebral bodies and the body 10. According to an exemplary device embodying principles of the present invention, the compliance of the connector 32, as well as some small amount of translation and rotation, is provided by lateral cuts or slots 70 extending into the connector 32. The body 10 when implanted between two vertebrae maintains a desirable space between the two adjacent vertebrae similar to that provided by a natural vertebra.

Although the body 10 has been shown as generally oblong in cross section, other shapes may be used, including circular, oval, elliptical, or rectangular. Although the connector section 32 has been illustrated in FIG. 1 as integral with the end section 30, according to other embodiments, the connector can include one or more separate compliant connectors or spacers in other configurations and at other locations. By way of example, a compliant connector may be the same or substantially the same diameter, size, and shape as the plates, multiple connectors can be arranged in a rectangular pattern, or a hollow cylindrical connector can be used. Further optionally, while the surfaces 24 are illustrated being perpendicular to the vertical axis of the body 10, one or both of the surfaces 24 can be somewhat wedge-shaped, formed with one or two lordosis angles, as well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The modular design of the upper plate 20 and the lower plate section 30 allows the creation of a complete bodies 10 of different sizes to correspond to the particular space for each patient.

The upper plate 20 and the lower plate or plate section 30, and connector 32, may be constructed from any suitable metal, alloy or combination of metals or alloys, such as but not limited to cobalt chrome alloys, titanium (such as grade 5 titanium), titanium based alloys, tantalum, nickel titanium alloys, stainless steel, and/or the like. They may also be formed of ceramics, biologically compatible polymers including PEEK, UHMWPE (ultra high molecular weight polyethylene) or fiber reinforced polymers. However, when polymer is used for the body 10, the contacting surfaces 24 may be coated or otherwise covered with metal for fixation. The upper plate 20 and the lower plate or plate section 30, and connector 32, may be formed of a one piece construction or may be formed of more than one piece, such as different materials coupled together. When the body 10 is formed of multiple materials, these materials are fixed together to form a unitary one piece spacer without separately moving parts.

Different materials may be used for different parts of the body 10 to optimize imaging characteristics. For example, the upper plate 20 and the lower plate or plate section 30 may be formed of titanium, while the connector 32 is formed of cobalt chromium alloy for improved imaging of the plates. Cobalt chrome molybdenum alloys, when used for the plates 20, 30 may be treated with aluminum oxide blasting followed by a titanium plasma spray to improve bone integration. Other materials and coatings can also be used such as titanium coated with titanium nitride, aluminum oxide blasting, HA (hydroxylapatite) coating, micro HA coating, and/or bone integration promoting coatings. Any other suitable metals or combinations of metals may be used as well as ceramic or polymer materials, and combinations thereof. Any suitable technique may be used to couple materials together, such as snap fitting, slip fitting, lamination, interference fitting, use of adhesives, welding and/or the like.

In some embodiments, the outer surface 24 is planar. Oftentimes, the outer surface 24 will include one or more surface features and/or materials to enhance attachment of the body 10 to vertebral bone. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, the outer surface 24 may be machined to have serrations 40 or other surface features for promoting adhesion of the plates 20, 30 to a vertebra. In the embodiment shown, the serrations 40 are pyramid shaped serrations extending in mutually orthogonal directions, but other geometries such as teeth, grooves, ridges, pins, barbs or the like would also be useful. When the bone integration structures are ridges, teeth, barbs or similar structures, they may be angled to ease insertion and prevent migration. These bone integration structures can be used to precisely cut the bone during implantation to cause bleeding bone and encourage bone integration. Additionally, the outer surface 24 may be provided with a rough microfinish formed by blasting with aluminum oxide microparticles or the like to improve bone integration. In some embodiments, the outer surface may also be titanium plasma sprayed or HA coated to further enhance attachment of the outer surface 24 to vertebral bone.

The outer surfaces 24 may also carry one or more upstanding fins 50, 52 which also extend laterally in an anterior-posterior direction. The fins 50, 52 are configured to be placed in slots in the vertebral bodies. Preferably, the fins 50, 52 each have a height greater than a width and have a lateral length greater than the height. In one embodiment, the fins 50, 52 are pierced by transverse holes 54 for bone ingrowth. The transverse holes 54 may be formed in any shape and may extend partially or all the way through the fins 50, 52. In alternative embodiments, the fins 50, 52 may be rotated away from the anterior-posterior axis, such as in a lateral-lateral orientation, a posterolateral-anterolateral orientation, or the like.

The fins 50, 52 provide improved attachment to the bone and prevent rotation of the plates 20, 30 in the bone. In some embodiments, the fins 50, 52 may extend from the surface 24 at an angle other than 90°. For example, on one or more of the plates 20, 22 where multiple fins 52 are attached to the surface 24, the fins may be canted away from one another with the bases slightly closer together than their edges at an angle such as about 80-88 degrees. The fins 50, 52 may have any other suitable configuration including various numbers angles and curvatures, in various embodiments. In some embodiments, the fins 50, 52 may be omitted altogether. The embodiment of FIG. 1 illustrates a combination of one plate with a single fin 50 and another plate with a double fin 52. This arrangement is useful for double level disc replacements and utilizes offset slots in the vertebral body to prevent the rare occurrence of vertebral body splitting by avoiding cuts to the vertebral body in the same plane for multi-level implants. The combination of the single fin 50 and double fin 52 can also assist the surgeon in placement of the spacer in the correct orientation.

The body 10 has been shown with the fins 50, 52 as the primary fixation feature; however, the fins may also be augmented or replaced with one or more screws extending through the plates and into the bone. For example in the body 10 of FIG. 1, the upper fin 50 may be augmented or replaced with one or more screws (not illustrated) while the two lower fins 52 remain. The plates 20, 30 can be provided with one or a series of holes 60 to allow screws to be inserted at different locations at the option of the surgeon. However, the holes 60 should not be of such size or number that the coverage of the plate 20, 30 is decreased to such an extent that subsidence occurs. Alternately, the screws can pass laterally through one or more of the holes in the fins. When one or more screws are provided, they may incorporate a locking feature to prevent the screws from backing out. The screws may also be provided with a bone integration coating.

Some limited holes may also be provided in the plate to allow bone ingrowth. However, if the outer surfaces 24 have holes therein, the holes advantageously cover less than 40 percent of the outer surface 24 which contacts the bone to prevent subsidence of the plates into the vertebral bodies. Preferably the holes will cover less than 25 percent, and more preferably less than 10 percent of the outer bone contacting surfaces. At the option of the surgeon, when the small holes are present in the plates 20, 30, bone graft can be placed in the holes to allow bone to grow through the plates. The embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 1-3 also illustrate the optional inclusion of countersunk screw holes 60 extending between a lateral surface of the plates 20, 30 and the end surfaces 24, in which bone screws may optionally be inserted to further stabilize the body 10. The holes 60 can alternatively extend vertically through the end plates, or the end plates can include combinations of vertical and angled holes.

The vertebral body replacement 10 shown herein is configured for placement in the vertebral column from an anterior approach. It should be understood that other approaches can be used, and the particular shape of the vertebral body replacement would be modified depending on the approach. For example, for a lateral approach, the vertebral body replacement may be formed in a more elongated, kidney bean, or banana shape with a transversely oriented fin.

As shown in FIG. 1, the vertebral body replacement 10 is provided with shock absorption or some other limited motion between the two plates 20, 30 by providing a compliant connector 32. The limited motion provided by the compliant connector 32 is designed to reduce forces on the interface between the outer surfaces 24 and the bone to improve long term fixation of the spacer. The compliance of the connector 32 allows motion between the vertebral bodies to be accommodated by the compliance in the body 10 rather than causing one or both of the vertebral bodies to pull away from the plates 20, 30. The compliant connector 32 provides limited relative motion between the plates, which may include compliance in a vertical direction of up to about 6 mm, rotation in an anterior/posterior direction, lateral direction, or axial rotation of less than about 10 degrees, and/or translation of up to about 1 mm.

In the vertebral body replacement 10 of FIG. 1, the compliance, as well as some small amount of translation and rotation, is provided by the cuts or slots 70 extending into the connector 32. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the slots 70 are spiral slots, however, other shaped slots may also be used. The compliant connector 32 is advantageously formed as a unitary member with at least one lateral cut or slot 70 positioned between the upper and lower plates 20, 30, permitting the plates to move resiliently toward and away from each other. The replacement 10 can also be formed as multiple parts where different properties are desired from the different parts, such as different radiopacities, different strengths, or different flexibility properties and for flexibility in creating the size and configuration of spacer suited to the patient. The lateral cuts 70 in the connector 32 allow the connector to function as a compliant member without affecting the function of the upper and lower plates of the body 10.

FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a body 10 having multiple parts including end plates 20, 30 and spacers 90. The spacers 90 include lateral cuts 70 in place of the spiral cuts of FIG. 1. The material remaining after the cuts 70 are made is called a column. A shallow cut, that is, one that extends laterally into the connector a relatively small distance, and a large column provides a stiffer spacer, while a deeper cut and smaller column provides a more compliant spacer. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the cuts 70 are at least 60% of the way through the spacer width or diameter, and preferably at least 75% of the way through the connector width.

Optionally, a variable stiffness shock absorbing connector 32 (FIG. 1) or spacer 90 (FIG. 2) can be constructed with lateral cuts 70 with tapering widths. For cuts with such tapering widths, the cut 70 is smallest where the cut terminates adjacent the column and is largest at the edge of the connector 32 furthest from the column. In this version, each of the lateral cuts 70 causes the connector 32 to act as a non linear spring providing progressively stiffer behavior upon larger compression. This is due to the fact that progressively more material on the sides of the cuts 70 is in contact as the connector 32 or spacer 90 is compressed. The non-linear spring can be incorporated in any of the other embodiments described herein to provide a softer stop to the compliant action of the core. The tapered width cuts 70 can provide the additional benefit of providing a flushing action during operation that moves any accumulated material out of the cuts.

The cuts 70 also advantageously include a stress relief 74 at the end of the cuts which increases the fatigue life of the device by reducing the stress concentration at the ends of the slots.

In the exemplary embodiments illustrated herein, a shock absorbing connector 32 includes either one or more planar cuts 70 (FIG. 2), or alternatively one or more spiral or helical cuts 70 (FIG. 1) to form one or more continuous spring coil elements 72 which provide compliance to the connector. Although the spiral cut connector 32 is illustrated in FIG. 1 with two spiral cuts, only one, or three or more spiral cuts may also be employed. For example, two or more spiral cuts 70 arranged in opposite directions can be formed in the connector 32, as illustrated in FIG. 1. Furthermore, when more than one spiral cut 70 is provided, the cuts can optionally be nested one inside the other (not illustrated), as in the manner of a multi-start thread, and/or can include combinations of both nested and adjacent cuts (such as those illustrated in FIGS. 1-2). The compression of a spiral cut connector 70 can result in some small amount of relative rotation between the upper and lower surfaces 20, 30. In cases where it is desirable to eliminate this rotation, a connector 32 having multiple spiral cuts in opposite directions can be used. For example, a connector 32 can be formed with a first spiral cut 70 at a top of the connector in a first direction and a second spiral cut 70 at a bottom of the core in an opposite second direction. The first and second spiral cuts can offset rotation of each other resulting in a non rotating compliant connector. The double spiral embodiment of the connector is also more stable in shear than the single coil. Furthermore, coils 74 provide significantly more surface area between the adjoining surfaces of the cuts 70 than do planar cuts, which can be advantageous to allow limited rotational motion. The spiral cuts 70 can be made parallel to the end surfaces of the body 10 or can be angled, as in a cone shape. When the spiral cuts 70 are angled to form a cone shaped spring the cone shaped surfaces can limit the translational movement of the spring.

In each of the shock absorbing connectors described herein, the interconnected sections within the connector and the plate(s) are designed for minimal or no motion between contacting parts to prevent particulate generation. However, since the plates and connectors are made entirely of hard materials such as metals, some minimal rubbing contact may be accommodated. In the exemplary embodiments illustrated in figures herein, a rotational interlock 80 is provided between the lower surface of the end plate 20 and the adjoining upper surface of the connector section 32 of the end plate 30. With reference to FIG. 2, the exemplary interlock 80 includes complementary portions 82, 84, formed on the adjoining faces of the end plate 20 and the connector section 32, in the exemplary body 10, taking the shape of simple raised portions or ribs 84 which mate with correspondingly sized and shaped recesses 82. The rotational interlock 80 is not limited to the particular shapes or orientations illustrated in the drawing figures, and can take any shape or orientation which resists, and advantageously prevents, the plate 20 and the connector section 32 from rotating relative to each other. The rotational interlock 80 on the top and bottom surface of a spacer 90 can be different to allow the complete body 10 to be assembled only in a particular desired configuration.

Further optionally, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, the body 10 can include one or more blind cavities 86 extending vertically through the connector section 32, which provides the interior side of the spiral cut 70. The blind cavities 86 can also vary in cross sectional size and shape to tailor the rigidity of the connector section 32 in different directions. More specifically, the cavity or cavities 86, only one of which is illustrated in FIG. 1A, when left hollow, provides a less rigid connector 32. To increase the rigidity of the connector section 32, other material can be used to partially or completely fill the cavity 86, such as pins or rods (not illustrated) inserted in the cavity.

When implanted between vertebrae, the shock absorbing connector 32 can resiliently absorb shocks transmitted vertically between upper and lower vertebrae of the patient's spinal column. This shock absorption is related to the material properties, design, and dimensions of the connector. In general, an increased number and width of the cuts 70 will increase absorption of shocks, with more elastic, or springy compression between the vertebrae.

Preferably the connector 32 is made of metal such as titanium, cobalt chromium alloy, stainless steel, tantalum, nickel titanium or a combination thereof. These materials also can be designed to provide a device which is deformable in the elastic region of the stress/strain curve and will not plastically deform during compression.

In the embodiments illustrated herein, the number, pitch, lead, lead angle, handedness, and total vertical length of each of the spiral cuts or slots 70, as well as the combination of multiple cuts if provided, can be varied to change the amount of compliance of the connector 32. When a load is applied to the upper and lower plates 20, 30, the connector 32 will compress with each of the cuts 70 closing and the total amount of compression possible depending on the number, arrangement, and height of the cuts. The cuts 70 form spiral coils 74 between the ends of the cut, which function like springs to allow the connector 32 to be compressed. The cuts 70 may be modified to be non-uniform to provide preferential deflection in one or more bending directions. Preferential deflection is useful to provide increased anterior-posterior compliance and less lateral compliance, or the other way around.

According to one embodiment of the invention, the cuts 70 in the shock absorbing connector 32 according to any of the embodiments described herein may be manufactured by wire EDM (electrical discharge machining), molding, laser cutting, or the like. A number of cuts 70 can vary from 1 to about 50, preferably about 6 to about 20, for a vertebral body replacement. A width of the lateral cuts 70 in the direction of the height of the body 10 is about 0.01 mm to about 2 mm, preferably about 0.05 to about 1 mm.

In one embodiment of the present invention, for a cervical application, the maximum deformation of the shock absorbing body is about 0.5 to about 4 mm, and is preferably about 1 to about 2 mm. For a lumbar application, the maximum deformation of the shock absorbing body is about 1 to about 6 mm, and is preferably about 1 to about 3 mm.

Although motion between the plates 20, 30 of the body 10 has been described herein as provided by cuts 70, it should be understood that this motion can be provided in a number of other known manners, such as use of resilient materials, or movable joints as long as the motion is limited to the small amount of motion allowable in a patient requiring a fusion procedure including compliance or vertical motion between the plates of up to about 6 mm, rotation between the plates of less than 10 degrees, and translation between the plates of up to about 1 mm.

The body 10 can be provided in different sizes, with different plate sizes, angles between plates, lordosis angles, and heights for different patients or applications. In addition, the shock absorbing connector section 32 can be provided in different compliances for different patients. In addition, the compliance and/or height of the body 10 can be adjustable, such as by rotating an adjustment screw before or after implantation, and/or bonding portions of one or more of the portions of a coil 74. The body 10 preferably is sized to provide substantial coverage of the vertebral surfaces. For example, in an anterior procedure, the plates 20, 30 are preferably sized to cover at least 50 percent of the vertebral surface. In posterior or lateral procedures, the coverage of the vertebral surface may be somewhat smaller due to the small size of the access area, i.e., the posterior or lateral spacers may cover about 40 percent or more of the vertebral surface with a one or two part spacer.

Turning now to FIG. 2, a second exemplary embodiment of a body 10, adhering to principles of the present invention, is illustrated. In contrast to the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 1A, the body 10 illustrated in FIG. 2 includes one or more separate compliant connector spacers 90 positioned between plates 20, 30, rather than a connector section 32 of a plate 30. Each of the spacers 90 includes one or more cuts 70, which can be either planar cuts or forming one or more coils, as described above with reference to the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 1A. The adjoining surfaces of the plates 20, 30 and the spacers 90 are also provided with rotational interlocks 80, as described herein; while FIG. 2 suggests that the interlocks 80 are the same, differently configured interlocks can alternatively be provided for different non-adjoining surfaces, for example to prevent the spacers 90 from being assembled in a way other than that designed for a body 10 configured for the particular patient. By way of non-limiting example, a first rotational interlock, formed of rectangular ribs and recesses on adjoining surfaces of the end plates and/or the spacers, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, can be provided on the adjoining surfaces of the plate 20 and the adjacent first spacer 90; a second rotational interlock, formed of vertically oriented cylindrical pins, can be provided on the opposite face of the first spacer 90 and the adjoining surface of the adjacent spacer or plate 30. Because the two interlocks 80 are incompatible and do not mate, there is only a single configuration of the pieces that will permit them to be assembled into a body 10.

FIG. 3 illustrates a third exemplary embodiment of a body 10, adhering to principles of the present invention. In addition to the features previously described with reference to FIGS. 1-2, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3 includes a vertical adjustment mechanism 100 for fine tuning of the vertical size of the body 10, either prior to or after implantation of body 10 into a patient. While numerous configurations of the adjustment mechanism 100 can be provided, one exemplary embodiment includes a threaded post or tube 102 extending from either an upper surface 106 of the end plate 30 or a lower surface 104 of the section 32, which mates with a correspondingly configured and threaded hole or post in the other of the end plate 30 and section 32. Rotation of the post 102 causes the two portions of the body 10 to move toward or away from each other, and thus decreases or increases the vertical size of the body 10, respectively. According to one version of the adjustable height vertebral body replacement an adjustment mechanism with oppositely threaded ends is inserted in the upper and lower parts 104, 106 and is adjustable after positioning in the patient.

According to one exemplary method adhering to principles of the present invention, a patient in need of a vertebral body replacement is prepped and surgical access is made to the particular vertebral body to be removed. Access to the surgical site is generally made anteriorly through the abdominal cavity for a lumbar procedure. One or more target vertebral body or bodies is removed in one of numerous manners known to those of ordinary skill in the art, between upper and lower remaining vertebral bodies in the patient's spine, and a vertebral body replacement 10, embodying principles of the present invention, is selected based on the measurement of the spacing for proper spinal alignment. The vertebral body replacement 10 is assembled and implanted in the space created by removal of the original vertebral body or bodies. Optionally, one or more spacers 90 are assembled into the body 10, prior to installation of the body 10 into the patient, and/or the vertical length of the body 10 is adjusted to better fit in the space. Further optionally, when the body 10 includes one or more cavities 86, additional material is inserted into the cavity, prior to implantation of the body, to tailor the rigidity of the body 10, or for other purposes.

While the exemplary embodiments have been described in some detail, by way of example and for clarity of understanding, those of skill in the art will recognize that a variety of modifications, adaptations, and changes may be employed. Hence, the scope of the present invention should be limited solely by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A vertebral body replacement for replacing at least one vertebral body between remaining upper and lower vertebral bodies, the vertebral body replacement comprising:

a first end plate having an upper surface configured to engage against a surface of the upper remaining vertebral body, and a lower surface opposite the upper surface spanning the first end plate;
a second end plate having a lower surface configured to engage against a surface of the lower remaining vertebral body;
a compliant connector section between the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate lower surface, the compliant connector section comprising a plurality of separate stackable spacers each having at least one helical cut configured and arranged to permit limited rotation between the first end plate and the second end plate in an anterior/posterior direction and a lateral direction; and
a rotational interlock on the first end plate lower surface and an upper surface of at least one of the spacers, the rotational interlock being configured and arranged to inhibit rotational motion between the first end plate lower surface and the at least one spacer upper surface,
wherein the rotational interlock comprises a first raised elongate portion extending in the anterior/posterior direction or the lateral direction on one of the first end plate lower surface or the at least one spacer upper surface and a first complementary elongate recess in the opposite surface.

2. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, wherein the second end plate includes an upper surface opposite the second end plate lower surface and spanning the second end plate, the compliant connector section located between the second end plate lower and upper surfaces.

3. The vertebral body replacement of claim 2, wherein said rotational interlock is a first rotational interlock, and further comprising a second rotational interlock on the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate upper surface, the second rotational interlock configured and arranged to at least inhibit rotational motion between the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate upper surface.

4. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, wherein the compliant connector section is configured and arranged to limit motion to less than 10 degrees between said remaining vertebral bodies.

5. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, wherein the at least one helical cut in each of the separate stackable spacers are oppositely oriented.

6. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, wherein said rotational interlock is a first rotational interlock, wherein the at least one spacer has a lower surface spanning the at least one spacer, wherein the second end plate has an upper surface spanning the second end plate, and further comprising:

a second rotational interlock on the second end plate upper surface and the at least one spacer lower surface, the second rotational interlock configured and arranged to at least inhibit rotational motion between the second end plate upper surface and the at least one spacer lower surface,
wherein the second rotational interlock comprises a second raised elongate portion extending in the anterior/posterior direction or the lateral direction on one of the second end plate upper surface or the at least one spacer lower surface and a second complementary elongate recess in the opposite surface.

7. The vertebral body replacement of claim 6, wherein the first and second rotational interlocks are different.

8. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, further comprising:

an adjustment mechanism between the first and second end plates, the adjustment mechanism configured and arranged to selectively move the first and second end plates towards and away from each other.

9. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, further comprising at least one bone ingrowth hole in at least one of the first and second end plates.

10. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, wherein each of the first and second end plates comprise a lateral surface, and wherein the at least one bone ingrowth hole extends between said lateral surface and said surface configured to engage against a surface of a remaining vertebral body.

11. The vertebral body replacement of claim 1, wherein the vertebral body replacement is sized and shaped to replace one or more entire vertebral bodies of the human spine.

12. A vertebral body replacement for replacing at least one vertebral body between remaining upper and lower vertebral bodies, the vertebral body replacement comprising:

a first end plate having an upper surface configured to engage against a surface of the upper remaining vertebral body, and a lower surface opposite the upper surface spanning the first end plate;
a second end plate having a lower surface configured to engage against a surface of the lower remaining vertebral body;
a compliant connector section between the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate lower surface, the compliant connector section comprising a plurality of separate stackable spacers each having at least one helical cut configured and arranged to form a continuous spring coil element; and
a rotational interlock on the first end plate lower surface and an upper surface of at least one of the spacers, the rotational interlock being configured and arranged to inhibit rotational motion between the first end plate lower surface and the at least one spacer upper surface,
wherein the rotational interlock comprises a raised elongate portion extending in the anterior/posterior direction or the lateral direction on one of the first end plate lower surface or the at least one spacer upper surface and a complementary elongate recess in the opposite surface.

13. The vertebral body replacement of claim 12, wherein the vertebral body replacement is sized and shaped to replace one or more entire vertebral bodies of the human spine.

14. A vertebral body replacement for replacing at least one vertebral body between remaining upper and lower vertebral bodies, the vertebral body replacement comprising:

a first end plate having an upper surface configured to engage against a surface of the upper remaining vertebral body, and a lower surface opposite the upper surface spanning the first end plate;
a second end plate having a lower surface configured to engage against a surface of the lower remaining vertebral body and an upper surface;
a compliant connector section between the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate lower surface, the compliant connector section comprising a plurality of separate stackable spacers each having at least one helical cut configured and arranged to form a continuous spring coil element; and
a rotational interlock on the second end plate upper surface and a lower surface of at least one of the spacers, the rotational interlock being configured and arranged to inhibit rotational motion between the second end plate upper surface and the at least one spacer lower surface,
wherein the rotational interlock comprises a raised elongate portion extending in the anterior/posterior direction or the lateral direction on one of the second end plate upper surface or the at least one spacer lower surface and a complementary elongate recess in the opposite surface.

15. The vertebral body replacement of claim 14, wherein the vertebral body replacement is sized and shaped to replace one or more entire vertebral bodies of the human spine.

16. A vertebral body replacement for replacing at least one vertebral body between remaining upper and lower vertebral bodies, the vertebral body replacement comprising:

a first end plate having an upper surface configured to engage against a surface of the upper remaining vertebral body, and a lower surface opposite the upper surface spanning the first end plate;
a second end plate having a lower surface configured to engage against a surface of the lower remaining vertebral body and an upper surface opposite the lower surface and spanning the second end plate;
a compliant connector section between the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate lower surface, the compliant connector section comprising a plurality of separate stackable spacers each having at least one helical cut configured and arranged to permit limited rotation between the first end plate and the second end plate in an anterior/posterior direction and a lateral direction; and
a rotational interlock on the second end plate upper surface and a lower surface of at least one of the spacers, the rotational interlock being configured and arranged to inhibit rotational motion between the second end plate upper surface and the at least one spacer lower surface,
wherein the rotational interlock comprises a raised elongate portion extending in the anterior/posterior direction or the lateral direction on one of the second end plate upper surface or the at least one spacer lower surface and a complementary elongate recess in the opposite surface.

17. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, wherein the compliant connector section is located between the second end plate lower and upper surfaces.

18. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, wherein the compliant connector section is configured and arranged to limit motion to less than 10 degrees between said remaining vertebral bodies.

19. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, wherein the at least one helical cut in each of the separate stackable spacers are oppositely oriented.

20. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, wherein said rotational interlock is a first rotational interlock, and further comprising a second rotational interlock on the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate upper surface, the second rotational interlock configured and arranged to at least inhibit rotational motion between the first end plate lower surface and the second end plate upper surface.

21. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, further comprising:

an adjustment mechanism between the first and second end plates, the adjustment mechanism configured and arranged to selectively move the first and second end plates towards and away from each other.

22. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, further comprising at least one bone ingrowth hole in at least one of the first and second end plates.

23. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, wherein each of the first and second end plates comprise a lateral surface, and wherein the at least one bone ingrowth hole extends between said lateral surface and said surface configured to engage against a surface of a remaining vertebral body.

24. The vertebral body replacement of claim 16, wherein the vertebral body replacement is sized and shaped to replace one or more entire vertebral bodies of the human spine.

25. A vertebral body replacement for replacing at least one vertebral body between remaining upper and lower vertebral bodies, the vertebral body replacement comprising:

a first end plate having an upper surface configured to engage against a surface of the upper remaining vertebral body and at least one elongated fin on the upper surface configured to enter a slot cut in the upper remaining vertebral body;
a second end plate having a lower surface configured to engage against a surface of the lower remaining vertebral body and at least one elongated fin on the lower surface configured to enter a slot cut in the lower remaining vertebral body;
a compliant connector section between the first end plate and the second end plate, the compliant connector section comprising a plurality of separate stackable spacers each having at least one helical cut configured and arranged to permit limited rotation between the first end plate and the second end plate in an anterior/posterior direction and a lateral direction, wherein the compliant connector section is configured and arranged to limit motion to less than 10 degrees between said remaining vertebrae.

26. The vertebral body replacement of claim 25, wherein the upper and lower surfaces have less than 10 percent comprising holes.

27. The vertebral body replacement of claim 25, further comprising one or more holes in the first and second end plates configured to receive screws extending through the plates and into the bone.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3867728 February 1975 Stubstad et al.
4309777 January 12, 1982 Patil
4531917 July 30, 1985 Linkow et al.
4566466 January 28, 1986 Ripple et al.
4619660 October 28, 1986 Christiansen et al.
4673407 June 16, 1987 Martin
4759766 July 26, 1988 Buttner-Janz et al.
4759769 July 26, 1988 Hedman et al.
4834757 May 30, 1989 Brantigan
4863477 September 5, 1989 Monson
4904261 February 27, 1990 Dove et al.
4917704 April 17, 1990 Frey et al.
4932969 June 12, 1990 Frey et al.
4946378 August 7, 1990 Hirayama et al.
4997432 March 5, 1991 Keller
5035716 July 30, 1991 Downey
5057108 October 15, 1991 Shetty et al.
5071437 December 10, 1991 Steffee
5122130 June 16, 1992 Keller
5192327 March 9, 1993 Brantigan
5195526 March 23, 1993 Michelson
5258031 November 2, 1993 Salib et al.
5282861 February 1, 1994 Kaplan
5306308 April 26, 1994 Gross et al.
5314477 May 24, 1994 Marnay
5320644 June 14, 1994 Baumgartner
5370697 December 6, 1994 Baumgartner
5394457 February 28, 1995 Leibinger et al.
5401269 March 28, 1995 Buttner-Janz et al.
5415704 May 16, 1995 Davidson
5423816 June 13, 1995 Lin
5458642 October 17, 1995 Beer et al.
5462575 October 31, 1995 Del Corso
5484437 January 16, 1996 Michelson
5489307 February 6, 1996 Kuslich et al.
5505732 April 9, 1996 Michelson
5507816 April 16, 1996 Bullivant
5534030 July 9, 1996 Navarro et al.
5556431 September 17, 1996 Buttner-Janz
5674296 October 7, 1997 Bryan et al.
5676701 October 14, 1997 Yuan et al.
5676702 October 14, 1997 Ratron
5683465 November 4, 1997 Shinn et al.
5702450 December 30, 1997 Bisserie
5709683 January 20, 1998 Bagby
5728159 March 17, 1998 Stroever et al.
5741253 April 21, 1998 Michelson
5776198 July 7, 1998 Rabbe et al.
5782832 July 21, 1998 Larsen et al.
5797909 August 25, 1998 Michelson
5797917 August 25, 1998 Boyd et al.
5824094 October 20, 1998 Serhan et al.
5836948 November 17, 1998 Zucherman et al.
5865846 February 2, 1999 Bryan et al.
5865848 February 2, 1999 Baker
5888226 March 30, 1999 Rogozinski
5895428 April 20, 1999 Berry
5899901 May 4, 1999 Middleton
5899911 May 4, 1999 Carter
5928284 July 27, 1999 Mehdizadeh
5989251 November 23, 1999 Nichols
5989291 November 23, 1999 Ralph et al.
6001130 December 14, 1999 Bryan et al.
6019792 February 1, 2000 Cauthen
6022376 February 8, 2000 Assell et al.
6039761 March 21, 2000 Li et al.
6039763 March 21, 2000 Shelokov
6080155 June 27, 2000 Michelson
6083228 July 4, 2000 Michelson
6086613 July 11, 2000 Camino et al.
6096038 August 1, 2000 Michelson
6106557 August 22, 2000 Robioneck et al.
6132465 October 17, 2000 Ray et al.
6136031 October 24, 2000 Middleton
6139551 October 31, 2000 Michelson et al.
6139579 October 31, 2000 Steffee et al.
6143033 November 7, 2000 Paul et al.
6146421 November 14, 2000 Gordon et al.
6156067 December 5, 2000 Bryan et al.
6159211 December 12, 2000 Boriani et al.
6159214 December 12, 2000 Michelson
6162252 December 19, 2000 Kuras et al.
6174311 January 16, 2001 Branch et al.
6176881 January 23, 2001 Schar et al.
6193757 February 27, 2001 Foley et al.
6224595 May 1, 2001 Michelson
6224607 May 1, 2001 Michelson
6231609 May 15, 2001 Mehdizadeh
6235030 May 22, 2001 Zucherman et al.
6261296 July 17, 2001 Aebi et al.
6264695 July 24, 2001 Stoy
6290726 September 18, 2001 Pope et al.
6296664 October 2, 2001 Middleton
6315797 November 13, 2001 Middleton
6322567 November 27, 2001 Mittelstadt et al.
6336941 January 8, 2002 Subba Rao et al.
6348071 February 19, 2002 Steffee et al.
6368350 April 9, 2002 Erickson et al.
6368351 April 9, 2002 Glenn et al.
6375681 April 23, 2002 Truscott
6375682 April 23, 2002 Fleischmann et al.
6395032 May 28, 2002 Gauchet
6402785 June 11, 2002 Zdeblick et al.
6409766 June 25, 2002 Brett
6413278 July 2, 2002 Marchosky
6416551 July 9, 2002 Keller
6436098 August 20, 2002 Michelson
6440139 August 27, 2002 Michelson
6447544 September 10, 2002 Michelson
6478800 November 12, 2002 Fraser et al.
6517544 February 11, 2003 Michelson
6517580 February 11, 2003 Ramadan et al.
6520967 February 18, 2003 Cauthen
6520996 February 18, 2003 Manasas et al.
6527804 March 4, 2003 Gauchet et al.
6533817 March 18, 2003 Norton et al.
6537279 March 25, 2003 Michelson
6554863 April 29, 2003 Paul et al.
6562047 May 13, 2003 Ralph et al.
6562074 May 13, 2003 Gerbec et al.
6565574 May 20, 2003 Michelson
6579321 June 17, 2003 Gordon et al.
6582466 June 24, 2003 Gauchet
6582468 June 24, 2003 Gauchet
6592624 July 15, 2003 Fraser et al.
6599294 July 29, 2003 Fuss et al.
6607558 August 19, 2003 Kuras
6607559 August 19, 2003 Ralph et al.
6610092 August 26, 2003 Ralph et al.
6623525 September 23, 2003 Ralph et al.
6645248 November 11, 2003 Casutt
6648895 November 18, 2003 Burkus et al.
6652533 November 25, 2003 O'Neil
6660038 December 9, 2003 Boyer, II et al.
6666866 December 23, 2003 Martz et al.
6669731 December 30, 2003 Ralph et al.
6669732 December 30, 2003 Serhan et al.
6673113 January 6, 2004 Ralph et al.
6682562 January 27, 2004 Viart et al.
6689132 February 10, 2004 Biscup
6706068 March 16, 2004 Ferree
6709439 March 23, 2004 Rogers et al.
6712819 March 30, 2004 Zucherman et al.
6712825 March 30, 2004 Aebi et al.
6719794 April 13, 2004 Gerber et al.
6723097 April 20, 2004 Fraser et al.
6726720 April 27, 2004 Ross et al.
6726721 April 27, 2004 Stoy et al.
6733532 May 11, 2004 Gauchet et al.
6740118 May 25, 2004 Eisermann et al.
6740119 May 25, 2004 Ralph et al.
6752832 June 22, 2004 Neumann
6755841 June 29, 2004 Fraser et al.
6764512 July 20, 2004 Keller
6764515 July 20, 2004 Ralph et al.
6770095 August 3, 2004 Grinberg et al.
6790233 September 14, 2004 Brodke et al.
6793678 September 21, 2004 Hawkins
6814737 November 9, 2004 Cauthen
6821298 November 23, 2004 Jackson
6827740 December 7, 2004 Michelson
6830570 December 14, 2004 Frey et al.
6835206 December 28, 2004 Jackson
6846328 January 25, 2005 Cauthen
6852126 February 8, 2005 Ahlgren
6863673 March 8, 2005 Gerbec et al.
6875213 April 5, 2005 Michelson
6896680 May 24, 2005 Michelson
6899735 May 31, 2005 Coates et al.
6936071 August 30, 2005 Marnay et al.
6936132 August 30, 2005 Topolnitsky
6964686 November 15, 2005 Gordon
6966929 November 22, 2005 Mitchell
6966931 November 22, 2005 Huang
6986788 January 17, 2006 Paul et al.
6989011 January 24, 2006 Paul et al.
6994727 February 7, 2006 Khandkar et al.
7011684 March 14, 2006 Eckman
7022138 April 4, 2006 Mashburn
7025787 April 11, 2006 Bryan et al.
7044972 May 16, 2006 Mathys et al.
7044983 May 16, 2006 Cheng
7056344 June 6, 2006 Huppert et al.
7060073 June 13, 2006 Frey et al.
7066958 June 27, 2006 Ferree
7081120 July 25, 2006 Li et al.
7083651 August 1, 2006 Diaz et al.
7087055 August 8, 2006 Lim et al.
7097648 August 29, 2006 Globerman et al.
7115132 October 3, 2006 Errico et al.
7118580 October 10, 2006 Beyersdorff et al.
7147665 December 12, 2006 Bryan et al.
7153325 December 26, 2006 Kim et al.
7169182 January 30, 2007 Errico et al.
7179294 February 20, 2007 Eisermann et al.
7182784 February 27, 2007 Evans et al.
7198644 April 3, 2007 Schultz et al.
7207991 April 24, 2007 Michelson
7214244 May 8, 2007 Zubok et al.
7217291 May 15, 2007 Zucherman et al.
7235082 June 26, 2007 Bartish et al.
7235101 June 26, 2007 Berry et al.
7235103 June 26, 2007 Rivin
7250060 July 31, 2007 Trieu
7255714 August 14, 2007 Malek
7261739 August 28, 2007 Ralph et al.
7267688 September 11, 2007 Ferree
7270679 September 18, 2007 Istephanous et al.
7270682 September 18, 2007 Frigg et al.
7303582 December 4, 2007 Brady
7303583 December 4, 2007 Schär et al.
7309358 December 18, 2007 Berry et al.
7318839 January 15, 2008 Malberg et al.
7326250 February 5, 2008 Beaurain et al.
7331994 February 19, 2008 Gordon
7331995 February 19, 2008 Eisermann et al.
7429270 September 30, 2008 Baumgartner et al.
7442211 October 28, 2008 de Villiers et al.
7452380 November 18, 2008 Zubok et al.
7491241 February 17, 2009 Errico et al.
7494508 February 24, 2009 Zeegers
7517363 April 14, 2009 Rogers et al.
7531001 May 12, 2009 de Villiers et al.
7549995 June 23, 2009 Schultz et al.
7563284 July 21, 2009 Coppes et al.
7563286 July 21, 2009 Gerber et al.
7575598 August 18, 2009 Albert et al.
7578848 August 25, 2009 Albert et al.
7585324 September 8, 2009 Albert et al.
7585326 September 8, 2009 de Villiers et al.
7615078 November 10, 2009 White et al.
7635368 December 22, 2009 Errico et al.
7637913 December 29, 2009 de Villiers et al.
7655045 February 2, 2010 Richelsoph
7708776 May 4, 2010 Blain et al.
7708777 May 4, 2010 O'Neil et al.
7731753 June 8, 2010 Reo et al.
7731754 June 8, 2010 de Villiers et al.
7749272 July 6, 2010 Robie et al.
7763055 July 27, 2010 Foley
7819922 October 26, 2010 Sweeney
8057545 November 15, 2011 Hughes et al.
8092534 January 10, 2012 Eckhardt
8142505 March 27, 2012 Tauber
8298287 October 30, 2012 Moumene
8491637 July 23, 2013 Matthis
8758441 June 24, 2014 Hovda et al.
8771357 July 8, 2014 Biedermann
20010016773 August 23, 2001 Serhan et al.
20010029377 October 11, 2001 Aebi et al.
20010051829 December 13, 2001 Middleton
20020022845 February 21, 2002 Zdeblick et al.
20020035400 March 21, 2002 Bryan et al.
20020045904 April 18, 2002 Fuss et al.
20020068936 June 6, 2002 Burkus et al.
20020091392 July 11, 2002 Michelson
20020116009 August 22, 2002 Fraser et al.
20020123753 September 5, 2002 Michelson
20020128715 September 12, 2002 Bryan et al.
20020165550 November 7, 2002 Frey et al.
20020177897 November 28, 2002 Michelson
20020198532 December 26, 2002 Michelson
20030009224 January 9, 2003 Kuras
20030014116 January 16, 2003 Ralph et al.
20030023245 January 30, 2003 Ralph et al.
20030028249 February 6, 2003 Baccelli et al.
20030040746 February 27, 2003 Mitchell et al.
20030045884 March 6, 2003 Robie et al.
20030045939 March 6, 2003 Casutt
20030074076 April 17, 2003 Ferree
20030083747 May 1, 2003 Winterbottom et al.
20030100951 May 29, 2003 Serhan et al.
20030125739 July 3, 2003 Bagga
20030130662 July 10, 2003 Michelson
20030135277 July 17, 2003 Bryan et al.
20030139812 July 24, 2003 Garcia et al.
20030187448 October 2, 2003 Michelson
20030191536 October 9, 2003 Ferree
20030195517 October 16, 2003 Michelson
20030195631 October 16, 2003 Ferree
20030199982 October 23, 2003 Bryan
20030199983 October 23, 2003 Michelson
20030204261 October 30, 2003 Eisermann et al.
20030208271 November 6, 2003 Kuras
20030229358 December 11, 2003 Errico et al.
20030233145 December 18, 2003 Landry et al.
20040002761 January 1, 2004 Rogers et al.
20040024407 February 5, 2004 Ralph
20040024410 February 5, 2004 Olson et al.
20040030391 February 12, 2004 Ferree
20040034426 February 19, 2004 Errico et al.
20040054411 March 18, 2004 Kelly et al.
20040059318 March 25, 2004 Zhang et al.
20040073307 April 15, 2004 Keller
20040073311 April 15, 2004 Ferree
20040073312 April 15, 2004 Eisermann et al.
20040093087 May 13, 2004 Ferree et al.
20040097928 May 20, 2004 Zdeblick et al.
20040098131 May 20, 2004 Bryan et al.
20040117021 June 17, 2004 Biedermann et al.
20040143270 July 22, 2004 Zucherman et al.
20040143332 July 22, 2004 Krueger et al.
20040143334 July 22, 2004 Ferree
20040167626 August 26, 2004 Geremakis et al.
20040176843 September 9, 2004 Zubok et al.
20040186569 September 23, 2004 Berry
20040215342 October 28, 2004 Suddaby
20040225295 November 11, 2004 Zubok et al.
20040225365 November 11, 2004 Eisermann et al.
20040230307 November 18, 2004 Eisermann et al.
20040236426 November 25, 2004 Ralph et al.
20040243238 December 2, 2004 Arin et al.
20040254644 December 16, 2004 Taylor
20050015094 January 20, 2005 Keller
20050015095 January 20, 2005 Keller
20050015152 January 20, 2005 Sweeney
20050021145 January 27, 2005 de Villiers et al.
20050021146 January 27, 2005 de Villiers et al.
20050027360 February 3, 2005 Webb et al.
20050038515 February 17, 2005 Kunzler
20050043800 February 24, 2005 Paul et al.
20050085917 April 21, 2005 Marnay et al.
20050107881 May 19, 2005 Alleyne et al.
20050113842 May 26, 2005 Bertagnoli et al.
20050113928 May 26, 2005 Cragg
20050143824 June 30, 2005 Richelsoph et al.
20050149189 July 7, 2005 Mokhtar et al.
20050154463 July 14, 2005 Trieu
20050165408 July 28, 2005 Puno et al.
20050171604 August 4, 2005 Michalow
20050187634 August 25, 2005 Berry
20050192586 September 1, 2005 Zucherman et al.
20050192670 September 1, 2005 Zubok et al.
20050197706 September 8, 2005 Hovorka et al.
20050216081 September 29, 2005 Taylor
20050216084 September 29, 2005 Fleischmann et al.
20050234553 October 20, 2005 Gordon
20050251260 November 10, 2005 Gerber et al.
20050251261 November 10, 2005 Peterman
20050261772 November 24, 2005 Filippi et al.
20050267580 December 1, 2005 Suddaby
20050267581 December 1, 2005 Marnay et al.
20060004377 January 5, 2006 Keller
20060004453 January 5, 2006 Bartish et al.
20060015183 January 19, 2006 Gilbert et al.
20060020342 January 26, 2006 Ferree et al.
20060025862 February 2, 2006 Villiers et al.
20060030862 February 9, 2006 de Villiers et al.
20060036325 February 16, 2006 Paul et al.
20060041313 February 23, 2006 Allard et al.
20060041314 February 23, 2006 Millard
20060052870 March 9, 2006 Feree
20060064169 March 23, 2006 Feree et al.
20060069439 March 30, 2006 Zucherman et al.
20060116768 June 1, 2006 Krueger et al.
20060136061 June 22, 2006 Navarro et al.
20060142858 June 29, 2006 Colleran
20060142862 June 29, 2006 Diaz et al.
20060155378 July 13, 2006 Eckman
20060167549 July 27, 2006 Mathys et al.
20060178744 August 10, 2006 de Villiers et al.
20060178746 August 10, 2006 Bartish, Jr. et al.
20060195097 August 31, 2006 Evans et al.
20060200239 September 7, 2006 Rothman et al.
20060200240 September 7, 2006 Rothman et al.
20060200242 September 7, 2006 Rothman et al.
20060200243 September 7, 2006 Rothman
20060224241 October 5, 2006 Butler et al.
20060235426 October 19, 2006 Lim et al.
20060235525 October 19, 2006 Gil et al.
20060235527 October 19, 2006 Buettner-Janz et al.
20060241641 October 26, 2006 Albans et al.
20060241766 October 26, 2006 Felton et al.
20060259144 November 16, 2006 Trieu
20060259146 November 16, 2006 Navarro et al.
20060265068 November 23, 2006 Schwab
20060265077 November 23, 2006 Zwirkoski
20060276902 December 7, 2006 Zipnick et al.
20060287728 December 21, 2006 Mokhtar et al.
20060293752 December 28, 2006 Moumene et al.
20060293753 December 28, 2006 Thramann
20060293754 December 28, 2006 de Villiers et al.
20070010826 January 11, 2007 Rhoda et al.
20070021837 January 25, 2007 Ashman et al.
20070032875 February 8, 2007 Blacklock et al.
20070067035 March 22, 2007 Falahee
20070067036 March 22, 2007 Hudgins et al.
20070073398 March 29, 2007 Fabian et al.
20070093898 April 26, 2007 Schwab et al.
20070100453 May 3, 2007 Parsons et al.
20070100454 May 3, 2007 Burgess et al.
20070100456 May 3, 2007 Dooris et al.
20070123903 May 31, 2007 Raymond et al.
20070123904 May 31, 2007 Stad et al.
20070135923 June 14, 2007 Peterman et al.
20070162133 July 12, 2007 Doubler et al.
20070168033 July 19, 2007 Kim et al.
20070168036 July 19, 2007 Ainsworth et al.
20070179615 August 2, 2007 Heinz et al.
20070213821 September 13, 2007 Kwak et al.
20070233077 October 4, 2007 Khalili
20070233247 October 4, 2007 Schwab
20070233248 October 4, 2007 Schwab et al.
20070233251 October 4, 2007 Abdou
20070270956 November 22, 2007 Heinz
20070270970 November 22, 2007 Trieu
20070282449 December 6, 2007 de Villiers et al.
20070299521 December 27, 2007 Glenn et al.
20080015698 January 17, 2008 Marino et al.
20080015701 January 17, 2008 Garcia et al.
20080021557 January 24, 2008 Trieu
20080051900 February 28, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080051901 February 28, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080125864 May 29, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080125865 May 29, 2008 Abdelgany
20080133011 June 5, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080154301 June 26, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080154305 June 26, 2008 Foley et al.
20080154382 June 26, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080161926 July 3, 2008 Melkent et al.
20080215155 September 4, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080221696 September 11, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080228274 September 18, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080228277 September 18, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20080294259 November 27, 2008 de Villiers et al.
20090043391 February 12, 2009 de Villiers et al.
20090048674 February 19, 2009 Zubok et al.
20090048677 February 19, 2009 McLeod et al.
20090076614 March 19, 2009 Arramon
20090105833 April 23, 2009 Hovda et al.
20090105834 April 23, 2009 Hovda et al.
20090105835 April 23, 2009 Hovda et al.
20090118836 May 7, 2009 Cordaro
20090192617 July 30, 2009 Arramon et al.
20090205188 August 20, 2009 de Villiers et al.
20090210060 August 20, 2009 de Villiers et al.
20090222101 September 3, 2009 de Villiers et al.
20090276051 November 5, 2009 Arramon et al.
20090326656 December 31, 2009 de Villiers et al.
20100004746 January 7, 2010 Arramon
20100004748 January 7, 2010 Cordaro
20100016972 January 21, 2010 Jansen et al.
20100016973 January 21, 2010 de Villiers et al.
20100030335 February 4, 2010 Arramon
20100049040 February 25, 2010 de Villiers et al.
20100069976 March 18, 2010 de Villiers et al.
20100076558 March 25, 2010 de Villiers et al.
20100087868 April 8, 2010 Barr et al.
20100100141 April 22, 2010 de Villiers et al.
20100179419 July 15, 2010 de Villiers et al.
20100268344 October 21, 2010 de Villiers et al.
20170071757 March 16, 2017 Hovda et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
3023353 April 1981 DE
3023353 April 1981 DE
10035182 February 2002 DE
0333990 September 1989 EP
0333990 May 1990 EP
0560140 September 1993 EP
0560141 September 1993 EP
0591712 April 1994 EP
0820740 January 1998 EP
1142544 October 2001 EP
1153582 November 2001 EP
1153582 November 2001 EP
1250898 October 2002 EP
1306064 May 2003 EP
1344493 September 2003 EP
1344506 September 2003 EP
1344507 September 2003 EP
1344508 September 2003 EP
1417940 May 2004 EP
1570813 September 2005 EP
2803741 July 2001 FR
61122859 June 1986 JP
S61122859 June 1986 JP
63164948 July 1988 JP
S63164948 July 1988 JP
WO-9920209 April 1999 WO
WO-9930651 June 1999 WO
WO-0004851 February 2000 WO
WO-0035384 June 2000 WO
WO-0042954 July 2000 WO
WO-0042954 November 2000 WO
WO-0101893 January 2001 WO
WO-0115637 March 2001 WO
WO-0168003 September 2001 WO
WO-0211650 February 2002 WO
WO-0211650 September 2003 WO
WO-2004000170 December 2003 WO
WO-2004000171 December 2003 WO
WO-2004026187 April 2004 WO
WO-2004054477 July 2004 WO
WO-2005004756 January 2005 WO
WO-2005004756 May 2005 WO
WO-2005053580 June 2005 WO
WO-2005072662 August 2005 WO
WO-2005112834 December 2005 WO
WO-2005112834 May 2006 WO
WO-2006119092 November 2006 WO
WO-2006119092 December 2006 WO
WO-2007121320 October 2007 WO
WO-2007121320 June 2008 WO
2003/9312 November 2003 ZA
200603171 September 2007 ZA
Other references
  • Chadwick et al., Radiolucent Structural Materials for Medical Applications, Jun. 1, 2001, MDDI, p. 1, http://www.mddionline.com/article/radiolucent-structural-materials-medical-applications.
  • Office action dated Feb. 8, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,731.
  • Office action dated Apr. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,733.
  • Office action dated Jun. 7, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,731.
  • Office action dated Aug. 26, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,733.
  • Office action dated Nov. 23, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,731.
  • Office action dated Nov. 28, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,733.
  • “ffice Action dated Dec. 19, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/359,298”.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 16, 2008 for PCT/US2008/080800.
  • Office action dated May 13, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,737.
  • Office action dated Jun. 19, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,737.
  • Office action dated Dec. 15, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,737.
  • Office action dated Dec. 18, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,737.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US08/80800, dated Dec. 16, 2008, 11 pages total.
  • Buttner-Janz, The Development of.the Artificial Disc. Introduction, pp. 1-18, Library of Congress Catalogue No. 92-75582, ISBN 0-9635430-0-8 (1989).
  • Hellier, et al. Wear Studies for Development of an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis. Spine, vol. 17 No. 6 Supplement pp. 86-96 (1992).
  • International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 19, 2008 for PCT/US2008/080798.
  • International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 29, 2008 for PCT/US2008/080804.
  • Lee, et al. Impact Response of the Intervertebral Disc in a Finite-Element Model. Spine. 2000; 25(19):2431-2439.
  • Lehuec, et al. Shock Absorption in Lumber Disc Prosthesis. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 2003; 16(4):346-351.
  • Office action dated Aug. 14, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,731.
Patent History
Patent number: RE47470
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 23, 2016
Date of Patent: Jul 2, 2019
Assignee: Simplify Medical Pty Ltd
Inventors: David Hovda (Mountain View, CA), Yves Arramon (Sunnyvale, CA)
Primary Examiner: Cary E Wehner
Application Number: 15/191,385
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Spine Bone (623/17.11)
International Classification: A61F 2/44 (20060101); A61F 2/30 (20060101); A61B 17/86 (20060101);