Mathamatical Board Game
A game is provided where players create expressions which are evaluated and scored based upon how close they are to the number twenty. Players remove five game tiles (16) from the game bag. The tiles are labeled 1-9 (18) or labeled with an operation (20) (time, minus, plus, over), the tiles (16) are approximately ⅘ in. squares and ¼ in. thick. The first player uses three or more game pieces (16) to form an expression. The second player then builds an expression using tiles he has and tiles (16) already on the board. Game play alternates between the two players for the duration of the game. Game-play ends when: all tiles have been played, either player runs out of tiles (16) or when neither player can play tiles. The player with the lowest score wins.
This application claims the benefit of PPA Ser. Nr. 61/548,552, filed on Oct. 18, 2011 by Ishmael and Pauline King, which is incorporated by reference.
BACKGROUND—PRIOR ARTSThe following is a tabulation of some prior arts that presently appears relevant:
U.S. Pat. Nos.
Many board games exist in the market place today. Many of these board game advertize themselves as competitive or educational but few can claim both qualities.
Board games that advertise themselves as educational often lack the competitive qualities to hold the interest of players. These games are used as teaching tools and become obsolete as their consumers learn the materials. Many educational board games require many complicated parts to appropriately teach the consumers. These parts make the game overcomplicated and the parts can be easily lost. Competitive board games often lack educational qualities that can make for a more fulfilling gaming experience.
Many educational and mathematical board games have been proposed—for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,707,239 (1998) to Butler, U.S. Pat. No. 4,561,658 (1985) to Peterson, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,893,718 (1999) to O'Donnell all related to mathematics. Although these games adequately teach their consumers mathematics they lack competitiveness. U.S. Pat. No. 5,707,239 (1998) to Butler, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,561,658 (1985) to Peterson teach mathematics by providing cards of dice labeled with math functions which when answered correctly allow a player to advance along a set pathway. This style of game play may be effective in teaching simple mathematics to a young audience but for an older audience this inescapable repetition can become boring. These games also require an excessive amount of parts.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,893,718 (1999) to O'Donnell adequately teaches mathematics and has some competitive aspects but its system of scoring does not actually require an understanding of basic math. Each tiles is assigned a point value and the actual answer to the expressions has no part in determining the score.
2011/0266746 (2011) to Hasbro INC. is not math related but is an example of a competitive game that lacks educational qualities.
All board-games heretofore mentioned suffer from a number of disadvantages:
-
- (a) Educational board games often lack competitive qualities
- (b) Competitive board games often lack educational qualities
- (c) Few Board Games have both competitive and educational qualities
In accordance with one embodiment, a board game that is composed of a grid-like board, playing tiles, tile holders, and a tile bag (not part of patent).
SUMMARYIn accordance with one embodiment a mathematical board game apparatus comprising of a matrix-like board, tiles holders, labeled tiles, and a bag (not part of the patent).
ADVANTAGESSeveral advantages of one or more aspects are as follows: provides a simple mathematical board game with both educational and competitive qualities; can be played by persons of different ages while remaining competitive; does not require excessive parts; game-play does slow down excessively towards the end of the game; and requires real-time cost-benefit decisions. Other advantages will be apparent from a consideration of the drawings and ensuing descriptions.
DRAWINGS—FIGURES
In the drawings (closely related figures have the same number but different alphabetical suffixes):
Referring now to
OPERATION—ALL FIGS.
Referring now to the drawings at
Regulation play rules of “King of 20”:
Two players position themselves on opposite sides of the playing board 10. Each player is provided with a tile rack 14 which can hold five tiles 16. One player is provided with a scorecard 26 and keeps score for duration of the game. 74 tiles 16 are used to play the game (45 printed with numbers 18 29 printed with operations 20). Tiles 16 are numbered 1-9 or printed with an operation (minus, plus, over, times). Each player then picks one tile from the tile bag to see who goes first. The person with the lowest number goes first. If one player picks an operation tile 20 and the other player picks a number tiles 18, the player with the number tile 20 goes first. If the numbers are the same or if two operations are picked, the players replace the tiles 16 and draw again. After determining which player will go first, both players draw five tiles 16 and place them on their tile racks 14. The first player then decides what expression can be made from of his or her tiles 16 and starts the game by placing three or more of his or her tiles 16 to form an expression covering at least one of the starting squares 12. On each play, the player will try to use his or her tiles to form an expression as close to twenty as possible. Tiles 16 can be placed vertically or horizontally but not diagonally. A timer can be used to limit the amount of time allowed in each turn, but it is not a required part of the game. In each turn, at least one and at most five tiles 16 can be played. After the first player places his or her tiles 16, the second player's expression must include one or more of the tiles 16 already on the playing board 10. The expressions used must comply with the following rules: expressions are evaluated top-to-bottom and left-to-right ignoring the normal rules of math where multiplication and division have priority; diagonal plays are not allowed; expressions never wrap to an adjacent row or column; double-digit numbers are ever allowed; any part of an expression involving division (the over tile) must evaluate to a whole number—plays using the “over” tile are not allowed if they do not result in a whole number; and players can only form one expression at a time. The game ends when one player is out of tiles 16 or if neither player can play any more tiles 16. At that point, each player must add ten points to their score for each tile 16 remaining on their rack 14. The player with the lowest score wins.
ALTERNATIVE EMBODIMENTSAlternate embodiments, including computer, multimedia, and performance versions may be explored. Although I have described an embodiment according to the invention with considerable details in the foregoing specification and illustrated it extensively in the drawings, it is to be understood that I may make changes in the structure of the device so long as any changes made remain within the score of the appended claims and any changed devices similar to mine made by others that fall within my claims scope, I shall consider such devices to be my invention.
Although the description above contains much specificity, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments but as merely providing illustrations of some of several embodiments. For example, the game may have other shapes, colors, or layouts.
Thus the scope of the embodiments should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, not by the given examples.
ADVANTAGESFrom the descriptions above, a number of advantages of some embodiments of my mathematical board game become evident:
-
- (a) The presented game provides competitive play for players at various age levels while teaching simple mathematical expression-building.
- (b) The use of a scoring system in which expressions are evaluated to determine a players score.
- (c) Game play that does not require that the total of the made expressions be shown on the playing surface.
- (d) The game board allows multiple places to place expressions which decreases game duration and reduces slow play at the end of the game.
- (e) Game requires real-time cost-benefit decisions
Accordingly, the reader can see that this mathematical board game in any embodiment remains competitive for all players while teaching simple mathematical expression-building. In addition, the game's unique scoring system and game play also become apparent to the reader. Furthermore this mathematical board game has additional advantages in that:
-
- Consumers of all ages and skill levels can play this board game competitively
- The presented board game has obvious educational opportunities
- The presented board game is intuitive, simple to setup and is fast-paced
- The presented board game has a limited amount of parts
- Uses a scoring system that can be calculated quickly and easily and has educational value.
- Game play is not complicated and encourages strategizing and risk-taking
Although the description above contains much specificity, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments but as merely providing illustrations of some of several embodiments. For example, the game may have other shapes, colors, or layouts.
Thus the scope of the embodiments should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, not by the given examples.
Claims
1. A game comprising in combination, a square playing board having a grid pattern consisting of playing position squares, numbered game pieces, game pieces with mathematical functions printed upon them, whereby it is necessary for players to complete the left side of mathematical equations.
2. A game according to claim 1, wherein said mathematical equations are calculated to arrive at a predefined value.
3. A game according to claim 1, wherein said the difference between the result value of mathematical calculations and a predefined value are added to players respective scores.
4. A game according to claim 1, wherein said the sum of the values calculated in claim 3 are totaled to arrive at a score.
Type: Application
Filed: Apr 22, 2012
Publication Date: May 2, 2013
Inventor: Ishmael King (Las Vegas, NV)
Application Number: 13/452,922
International Classification: A63F 3/04 (20060101);