Method and System for Adaptive Tone Cancellation for Mitigating the Effects of Electromagnetic Interference

Abstract

Aspects of a method and system for adaptive tone cancellation for mitigating the effects of interference are provided. In this regard, an Ethernet PHY may receive one or more signals via a corresponding one or more physical channels and generate one or more estimate signals, each of which approximates interference present in a corresponding one of the received signals. The Ethernet PHY may subtract each one of the estimate signals from a corresponding one of the received signals. The subtracting may occur at the input of one or more slicers in the Ethernet PHY. The received signals may be processed via one or more equalizers in the Ethernet PHY. A decision output of a slicer in the Ethernet PHY may be subtracted from one of the the one or more received signals, and a signal resulting from the subtraction may be utilized to generate the one or more estimate signals.

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS/INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/835,419 filed on Jul. 13, 2010, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/360,800 filed on Jul. 1, 2010.

The above stated applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Certain embodiments of the invention relate to signal processing. More specifically, certain embodiments of the invention relate to a method and system for adaptive tone cancellation for mitigating the effects of electromagnetic interference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In almost any communication system, interference, externally and/or internally generated, limits the performance of the communication system. Differential signaling is one technique that can be utilized for dealing with such interference. However, while differential signaling may reduce the effects of such interference, it does not eliminate them.

Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional approaches will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems with some aspects of the present invention as set forth in the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A system and/or method is provided for adaptive tone cancellation for mitigating the effects of electromagnetic interference, substantially as illustrated by and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.

These and other advantages, aspects and novel features of the present invention, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. is a diagram depicting two communication devices communicating over a plurality of physical channels, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2A is a diagram depicting an exemplary portion of a communication device that may be operable to provide interference cancellation, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2B is a diagram illustrating an exemplary tone generator operable to track an interference signal, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2C is a diagram illustrating an exemplary data multiplexer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2D is a diagram illustrating a plurality of error multiplexers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating exemplary magnetics comprising a common mode sense circuit, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating exemplary steps for interference cancellation, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Certain embodiments of the invention may be found in a method and system for adaptive tone cancellation for mitigating the effects of electromagnetic interference. In various embodiments of the invention, an Ethernet PHY may receive one or more signals via a corresponding one or more physical channels and generate one or more estimate signals, each of which approximates interference present in a corresponding one of the received signals. The Ethernet PHY may subtract each one of the estimate signals from a corresponding one of the received signals. The subtracting may occur at the input of one or more slicers in the Ethernet PHY. The received signals may be processed via one or more equalizers in the Ethernet PHY. One of the received signals at an output of one of the equalizers may be utilized to generate the one or more estimate signals. The Ethernet PHY may receive a common mode signal from a common mode sensor coupled to one of the physical channels. The common mode signal may be utilized to generate the one or more estimate signals. A decision output of a slicer in the Ethernet PHY may be subtracted from an output of an equalizer in the Ethernet PHY, and a signal resulting from the subtraction may be utilized to generate the one or more estimate signals.

The one or more estimate signals may be generated utilizing a selected one of the following signals: a signal output by an equalizer in the Ethernet PHY, a signal resulting from a subtraction of a slicer decision output from the equalizer output, and a signal output by a common mode sensor coupled to one of the physical channels. The selection may be based on a strength of the interference. The Ethernet PHY may be operable to generate a pair of phase-quadrature signals having a frequency that tracks a frequency of the interference. An adaptive filter in the Ethernet PHY may utilize the phase-quadrature signals to generate the one or more estimate signals. The one or more estimate signals may be generated utilizing a selected one of a decision output of a slicer and an error output of the slicer. The selected one of the decision output and the error output may be utilized by the adaptive filter for generating the one or more estimate signals. The selection may be based on a strength of the interference.

FIG. 1 is a diagram depicting two communication devices communicating over a plurality of physical channels, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 1 there is shown a communication device 102a and a communication device 102b which communicate over a cable 108 that comprises physical channels 106₁-106_N, where N is an integer greater than or equal to 1.

Each of the communication devices 102a and 102b may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to communicate, utilizing differential signaling, over one or more of the channels 106₁-106_N. Each channel 106_n may comprise, for example a twisted-pair, where n is an integer between 1 and N inclusive. In this regard, each of the communication devices 102a and 102b may comprise one or both of a transmitter and a receiver. In various embodiments of the invention, the communication devices 102a and 102b may communicate over the cable 108 in accordance with IEEE 802.3 (Ethernet) standards. For example, for 10/100/1G/10GGBASE-T the cable 108 may comprise twisted pairs 106₁-106₄, and the communication devices 102a and 102b may, depending on the particular 802.3 standard being utilized, may engage in simplex, half-duplex, and/or full-duplex communications over one or more of the twisted pairs 106₁-106₄.

In operation, signals 103₁-103_N may be present on the channels 106₁-106_N. Electromagnetic interference signal 104 may be incident on the cable 108 and may appear on the channels 106₁-106_N as interference components 104′₁-104′_N. Thus, the signals 103₁-103_N may comprise desired components 105₁-105_N, (not shown) respectively, and interference components 104′₁-104′_N (not shown), respectively. Exemplary sources of the interference 104 comprise broadcast radio and/or television signals, cellular signals, walkie-talkie signals, and interference radiated from other electronic devices or cables located near the cable 108. Degraded communications over the cable 108 resulting from the interference 104 may manifest itself in the form of, for example, increased receive error rates in the communication devices 102a and 102b. Accordingly, for each channel 106_n, where n is an integer between 1 and N, inclusive, a signal that estimates the interference component 104′_n may be generated, and estimated interference signal may be subtracted from the signal 103_n received via the channel 106_n.

In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the interference components 104′₁-104′_N may be estimated by detecting the common mode signal on one of the channels 106₁-106_N utilizing a common mode sense circuit. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the interference components 104′₁-104′_N may be estimated utilizing the output of one of a plurality of equalizers that process signals received via channels 106₁-106_N, thus eliminating the need for the common mode sense circuit. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, either the equalizer output or the common mode sense circuit output may be selected based on the strength of one or more of the interference components 104′₁-104′_N. The strength of the interference components may be determined by, for example, monitoring an error rate in the receiver.

FIG. 2A is a diagram depicting an exemplary portion of a communication device that may be operable to provide interference cancellation, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 2A there is shown a portion of a communication device 102 which may communicate over four physical channels, that is, N=4. The communication device comprises magnetics 202, memory 222, processor 224, and an Ethernet PHY 200. Depicted portions of the Ethernet PHY 200 comprise analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) 204₁-204₄, equalizers 206₁-206₄, combiners 208₁-208₄, slicers 210₁-210₄, low density parity check (LDPC) decoder 212, error multiplexer 214₁-214₄, adaptive filter 216₁-216₄, tone generator 218, and ADC 220. In the exemplary embodiment of the invention depicted in FIGS. 2A-2D, N is equal to 4, but the invention is not so limited.

In various embodiments of the invention, the various components depicted in FIG. 2A may be interconnected via differential traces on and/or in printed circuit boards (PCBs) and/or integrated circuits (ICs) on and/or in which the components are fabricated. Such differential signal routing may reduce noise coupled into the signals within and/or on the PCBs and/or ICs.

The magnetics 202 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to couple the channels 106₁-106₄ to the Ethernet PHY 200. In this regard, the magnetics 202 may provide noise and/or EMI suppression and/or may impedance match the channels 106₁-106₄ to the Ethernet PHY 200. In this regard, the magnetics 202 may comprise one or more transformers and/or one or more inductive chokes. In some instances, the magnetics 202 may also comprise other components such as resistors, capacitors, and/or inductors for achieving impedance matching, isolation, and/or noise and/or EMI suppression. In some embodiments of the invention, the magnetics 302 may comprise a common mode sense circuit 326 which may output a common mode signal 203. The common mode signal 203 may comprise the interference component 104′_n of the signal 103_n. Utilizing the common mode signal 203 may mean that the signal 203 comprises (ideally) only the interference signal and thus it may be easier to lock onto the interference component. Utilizing the common mode signal 203 may require additional circuitry in the form of the common mode sense circuit and the common mode ADC 220. Additional details of the magnetics 202 are described below with respect to FIG. 3.

The processor 224 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to control operation of the Ethernet PHY 200. In this regard, the processor 224 may be operable to configure one or more components of the Ethernet PHY 100. For example, the processor 224 may configure coefficients of the equalizers 206₁-206₄ and/or the adaptive filters 216₁-216₄, provide control signals to the multiplexers 214₁-214₄, and provide one or more control signals to the tone generator 218.

The memory 222 may comprise any suitable memory such as RAM, ROM, flash, and/or magnetic storage. The processor 224 may utilize the memory 222 to control operation of the Ethernet PHY 200.

Each of the ADCs 204₁-204₄ and 220 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to convert an analog signal to a digital representation. In this regard, the analog signals 103₁-103₄ coupled into the PHY 200 via the magnetics 202 may be converted to digital signals 205₁-205₄. Similarly, the analog common mode signal 203 output by the magnetics 202 may be converted to the digital common mode signal 221.

Each of the equalizers 206₁-206₄ may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code may be operable to filter and/or otherwise process the digitized received signals 205₁-205₄. The equalizers 206₁-206₄ may, for example, filter the received signals to compensate for nonlinear, e.g., frequency dependent, distortion introduced by the physical channels 106₁-106₄.

Each of the combiners 208₁-208₄ may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to add and/or subtract digital signals. A weighting may be applied to one or more of the signals prior to addition or subtraction of the signals.

Each of the slicers 210₁-210₄ may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code for implementing various aspects of the invention. Each of the slicers 210₁-210₄ may be operable to determine a symbol value corresponding to a voltage of the corresponding one of the signals 209₁-209₄. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, each of the slicers 210₁-210₄ may determine which double square 128 (DSQ128) symbol value is represented by the voltage of the corresponding one of the signals 209₁-209₄. Also, each of the slicers 210₁-210₄ may be operable to generate an error signal corresponding to the difference between the voltage of the corresponding one of the signals 209₁-209₄ and the ideal voltage of the determined symbol.

The LDPC decoder 212 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to decode the received symbols output by the slicers 210₁-210₄ to recover data originally transmitted by the source device. The decoding may correct for errors introduced while the data was in transmit.

Each of the error multiplexers 214₁-214₄ may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to select between a corresponding one of signals 209₁-209₄ and a corresponding one of signals 213₁-213₄.

The adaptive filters 216₁-216₄ may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to generate, respectively, signals 217₁-217₄. The signals 217₁-217₄ comprise estimations of the interference components 104′₁-104′₄ present in the received signals 103₁-103₄, respectively. A pair of quadrature-phase signals generated by the tone generator 218, and an output from a corresponding one of the error multiplexers 214₁-214₄ may be input to each of the adaptive filters 216₁-216₄.

The tone generator 218 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to lock to the interference component 104′_n of the signal 207_n and/or lock to the common mode signal 221

In operation, signals 103₁-103₄ may be received via the channels 106₁-106₄ and may be coupled into the Ethernet PHY 200 by the magnetics 202. The signals 103₁-103₄ may comprise desired components 105₁-105₄ and interference components 104′₁-104′₄ resulting from the EMI 104 (FIG. 1). Additionally, in various embodiments of the invention, the magnetics 202 may output the common mode signal 203 which may correspond to the interference component 104′_n of the physical channel 106_n, where n may be any value between 1 and 4, inclusive.

The signals 103₁-103₄ may be digitized by the ADCs 204₁-204₄ and processed by the equalizers 206₁-206₄ to generate signals 207₁-207₄. The signal 203 may be digitized by the ADC 220 to generate the signal 221. A data multiplexer of the tone generator 218 may select one of the input signals or a combination of input signals as described below in FIG. 2C. The tone generator 218 may then process the selected signal to isolate and/or enhance the interference 104′_n and generate the quadrature-phase signals 219₁ and 219₂.

The adaptive filters 216₁-216₄ may, based on the output of a corresponding one of the error multiplexers 214₁-214₄, utilize the phase-quadrature signals 219₁ and 219₂ to generate the estimate signals 217₁-217₄. In this regard, an estimate signal 217_n may be generated for each physical channel 106_n to account for phase and/or amplitude variations among the interference components 104′₁-104′₄. Such variations may result from, for example, variations in length and/or impedance among the channels 106₁-106₄. To match the phase of the signal 217_n to the phase of the interference 104′_n, the adaptive filter 216_n may scale one or both of the signals 219₁ and 219₂ and combine the scaled versions of the signals 219₁-219₂, thus utilizing trigonometric identities to achieve the desired phase. To match the amplitude of the signal 217_n to the amplitude of the interference 104′_n, the adaptive filter 217_n may scale one or both of the signals 219₁ and 219₂ and and/or may scale the signal resulting from the combination of the signals 219₁ and 219₂. Operation of the error multiplexers 214₁-214₄ is described below with respect to FIG. 2D.

The combiners 208₁-208₄ may subtract the estimate signals 217₁-217₄ from the signals 207₁-207₄, respectively, to generate the signals 209₁-209₄, which may comprise interference components 104″₁-104″₄, respectively. Thus, in instances that the estimate signals 217₁-217₄ are zero, then the interference components 104′₁-104′₄ are equal to the interference components 104″₁-104″₄. Conversely, in instances that the estimate signals 217₁-217₄ exactly match the interference components 104′₁-104′₄, then the interference components 104″₁-104″₄ of the signals 209₁-209₄ are zero.

The slicers 210₁-210₄ may process the signals 209₁-209₄ and, for each sample value, determine the symbol represented by the voltage. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the Ethernet PHY 200 may support 10GBASE-T and each slicer 210_n may determine which one of 16 possible symbols is represented by a voltage of the signal 209_n. The slicer may output the determined symbol as signal 211 _n and may output the difference between the ideal voltage of the determined symbol and the voltage of the signal 209_n as signal 213_n.

The LDPC 212 may process the four received symbols from the slicers 210₁-210₄ and determine the data originally transmitted by the source device. The LDPC 212 may provide forward error correction.

For convenience and clarity of description, signals upstream from the combiners 208₁-208_N, including the signals 103₁-103₄, the signals 205₁-205₄, and the signals 207₁-207₄, may be referred to as “received signals.”

FIG. 2B is a diagram illustrating an exemplary tone generator operable to track an interference signal, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 2B, the tone generator 218 may comprise a data multiplexer 230, a filter 232, automatic gain control (AGC) 234, phase locked loop (PLL) 236, and tone generation block 238.

The data multiplexer 230 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code which may be controlled to select one of a plurality of signals to be conveyed to the filter 232. An exemplary data multiplexer is described below with respect to FIG. 2C.

The filter 232 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code having a frequency response such that frequencies within a selected band are attenuated less than frequencies outside the selected band. In various embodiments of the invention, the filter 232 may be configurable such that it has a bandpass frequency response in one or more configurations and a high-pass frequency response in one or more other configurations. The frequency response of the filter 232, for example the center frequency for a bandpass response or the cut-off frequency for a high-pass response, may be controlled via the control signal 239 which may be generated by the processor 224. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the filter 232 may comprise a second order infinite impulse response (IIR) filter.

The AGC 234 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to apply a gain to the signal 233 to generate the signal 235. The amount of gain applied may be based on feedback such that levels of signal 235 are kept within an optimum range for operation of the PLL 236.

The PLL 236 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to generate a signal 237 having a frequency that tracks the frequency of the interference 104′_n. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the PLL 236 may comprise a phase detector, a loop filter and one or more numerical controlled oscillators (NGOs) in a feedback path from the loop filter to the phase detector. The output of the loop filter may be the signal 237.

The tone generation block 238 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to generate phase-quadrature tones 219₁ and 219₂ having a frequency that tracks the frequency of the interference 104′_n.

In operation, the data multiplexer 230 may select signal 207_n, signal 221, or a signal corresponding to a difference between the signals 207_n and the signal 211_g. The data multiplexer 230 may be controlled by the processor 224. In this regard, the processor 224 may control the data multiplexer 230 based on the presence and/or strength of one or more of the interference components 104″₁-104″₄, which may be determined by, for example, monitoring the error outputs 213₁-213₄ and/or an error rate out of the LDPC 212.

The signal selected by the data multiplexer 230 may be output as signal 231 to the filter 232. The filter 232 may process the signal 231 to generate the signal 233. Ideally, the signal 233 comprises only the interference 104′_n, but in reality other signals and/or noise will also be present.

The frequency response of the filter 232 may be set by the processor 224. Furthermore, the processor 224 may disable one or more portions of the tone generator 218. In this regard, the tone generator 218 being disabled may result in the estimate signals 217₁-217₄ (FIG. 2A) being zero and thus the signals 209₁-209₄ (FIG. 2A) being equal to the signals 207₁-207₄ (FIG. 2A). The processor 224 may enable and disable portions of the tone generator 218 based on the presence and/or strength of one or more of the interference components 104″₁-104″₄, which may be determined by, for example, monitoring the error outputs 213₁-213₄ and/or an error rate out of the LDPC 212.

The PLL 236 may lock to the signal 235 and output the signal 237. In this regard, because the filter 232 cannot perfectly pass only the interference 104′_n, there may be other noise and/or components of the signal 233 that do not result from the interference 104. Accordingly, by locking to the frequency of the interference 104′_n and generating the signal 237 from an oscillator that is more spectrally pure, the signals 237 may represent a cleaner version of the interference 104′_n. That is, the signal 237 may be free of some noise or other signal components that are present in the signal 233.

The tone generation block 238 may receive the output of the PLL 238 and generate phase quadrature signals 219₁ and 219₂ having a frequency that accurately tracks the frequency of the interference 104′_n.

FIG. 2C is a diagram illustrating an exemplary data multiplexer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 2C, the data multiplexer 230 may comprise combiners 244₁-244₄, 2-to-1 multiplexers 242₁-242₄, and a 5-to-1 multiplexer 241.

Each of the combiners 244₁-244₄ may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to add and/or subtract digital signals. A weighting may be applied to one or more of the signals prior to addition or subtraction of the signals. The combiners 244₁-244₄ may subtract the estimate signals 207₁-207₄ from the signals 211₁-211₄, respectively, to generate the signals 245₁-245₄.

Each 2-to-1 multiplexer 242_n may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to select between the signal 211 _n and the signal 245_n and output the selected signal as signal 243_n.

The 5-to-1 multiplexer 241 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to select one of the signal 243₁, 243₂, 243₃, 243₄, and 221.

In operation, the processor 224 (FIG. 2A) may generate the signal 241 to control the multiplexers 242₁-242₄ and 244. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the signal 221 may be selected if it is available. If the signal 221 is not available, one of the signals 207₁-207₄ may be selected when the interference components 104″₁-104″₄ are strong and one of the signals 245₁-245₄ may be selected when the interference components 104″₁-104″₄ are weak. In this regard, the data multiplexer 218 may be controlled based on the presence and/or strength of the interference 104, which may be determined by, for example, monitoring the error outputs 213₁-213₄ and/or the error rate out of the LDPC decoder 212.

FIG. 2D is a diagram illustrating a plurality of error multiplexers in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 2D, each error multiplexer 214_n may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, interfaces, and/or code that may be operable to select between the signal 209_n and the signal 213_n and output the selected signal as signal 215_n.

In operation, the processor 224 (FIG. 2A) may generate the signal 251 to control the error multiplexers 214₁-214₄. Signal 251 may be generated based on the presence and/or strength of the interference components 104″₁-104″₄, which may be determined by, for example, monitoring the error outputs 213₁-213₄ and/or the error rate out of the LDPC decoder 212. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the signals 209₁-209₄ may be selected when the interference components 104″₁-104″₄ of the signals 209₁-209₄ are strong and the signals 213₁-213₄ may be selected when the interference components 104″₁-104″₄ of the signals 209₁-209₄ are weak. In this regard, the error multiplexers 214₁-214₄ may initially be configured to select signals 209₁-209₄ until the tone generator 218 has a chance to converge and start generating estimate signals 217₁-217₄ that reduce the interference components 104″₁-104″₄ of the signals 209₁-209₄. Once the interference components 104″₁-104″₄ have been sufficiently reduced, the error multiplexers 214₁-214₄ may be reconfigured to select the signals 213₁-213₄.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating exemplary magnetics comprising a common mode sense circuit, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 3, the magnetics 202 may couple the channels 106₁-106_N to the differential signal traces 306₁-306_N. The magnetics 202 may comprise chokes 302₁-302_N, transformers 304₁-304_N+1, and resistors 306a and 306b. In this regard, the common mode sensor 326 may comprise the resistors 306a and 306b and the transformer 304_N+1.

The chokes 302₁-302_N may be operable to attenuate common mode signals while passing differential signals. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the chokes 302₁-302_N may comprise one or more inductors and/or ferrites.

The transformers 304₁-304_N+1 may be operable to inductively couple the differential outputs of the chokes 302₁-302_N to the differential signal traces 306₁-306_N+1. Each of the transformers 304₁-304_N+1 may comprise a primary winding, a secondary winding, and a core.

The resistors 306a and 306b and the transformer 304_N+1 form an exemplary common mode sense circuit 326. In another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the common mode sensor 326 may comprise a center tap of one of the transformers 304₁-304_N. In such an embodiment of the invention, the resistors 306a and 306b and the transformer 304_N+1 may be unnecessary.

In operation, common mode energy on the two conductors of channel 106_N may sum through the resistors 306a and 306b and appear as a single-ended raw common mode signal at the primary winding 304_N+1. The transformer 304_N+1 may convert the single-ended raw common mode signal to a differential raw common mode signal on the differential trace 306_N+1.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating exemplary steps for interference cancellation, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Referring to FIG. 4, the exemplary steps may begin with step 402 in which the processor 224 may detect the presence of interference and enable interference cancellation. For example, the presence of interference may be detected based on an error rate out of the LDPC decoder 212. The cancellation of interference may comprise, for example, enabling various portions of the tone generator 218. In step 404, it may be determined whether the common mode signal 221 is available from the ADC 220. That is, it may be determined whether a common mode sense circuit 326 is present. In instances that there is no common mode sense circuit, the exemplary steps may advance to step 408. In step 408, it may be determined whether one or more of the interference components 104′₁-104′_N is above a threshold. In instances that the interference is above a threshold, the steps may advance to step 412. In step 412, the data multiplexer 230 may be configured to select the signal 207_n to be output as signal 231. Subsequent to step 412, the exemplary steps may advance to step 414.

Returning to step 408, in instances that the interference components 104′₁-104′_N are above a threshold, the exemplary steps may advance to step 410. In step 410, the data multiplexer may be configured to select the difference between an equalizer output 207_n and the corresponding slicer decision output 211 _n. Subsequent to step 410, the exemplary steps may advance to step 414.

Returning to step 404, in instances that the signal 221 is available, the exemplary steps may advance to step 406. In step 406, the data multiplexer 230 may be configured to select the signal 221 to be output as the signal 231.

In step 414, it may be determined whether the interference present in one or more of the signals 209₁-209_N is above a threshold. Subsequent to step 406, the exemplary steps may advance to step 414.

In step 414, it may be determined whether one or more of the interference components 104″₁-104″_N are above a threshold. In instances that the interference is above a threshold, the exemplary steps may advance to step 416. In step 416, the error multiplexers 214₁-214_N may be configured to select the signals 209₁-209_N, respectively. Subsequent to step 416 the exemplary steps may advance to step 420.

Returning to step 414, in instances that the interference components 104″₁-104″_N are below a threshold, the exemplary steps may advance to step 418. In step 418, the error multiplexers 214₁-214_N may be configured to select the signals 213₁-213_N, respectively. Subsequent to step 418 the exemplary steps may advance to step 420.

In step 420, the tone generator 218 may lock to the interference and output phase-quadrature tones 219₁ and 219₂. In step 422, the adaptive filters 216₁-216_N may utilize the signals 219₁ and 219₂ and the output of the error multiplexers 214₁-214_N to generate the estimate signals 217₁-217_N. In step 424, the estimate signals 217₁-217_N may be subtracted from the signals 207₁-207_N, in order to reduce the interference components 104″₁-104″_N. Subsequent to step 424, the exemplary steps may return to step 414.

Various embodiments of a method and system for adaptive tone cancellation for mitigating the effects of electromagnetic interference are provided. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, an Ethernet PHY 200 may receive one or more signals 103₁-103_N via a corresponding one or more physical channels 106₁-106_N. The Ethernet PHY 200 may generate one or more estimate signals 217₁-217_N, each of which approximates interference 104′₁-104′_N present in a corresponding one of the received signals 103₁-103_N. The Ethernet PHY 200 may be operable to subtract each one of the estimate signals 217₁-217_N from a corresponding one of received signals 207₁-207_N, where received signals 207₁-207_N may correspond to the received signals 103₁-103₄ at the output of equalizers 106₁-106₄. The subtracting may occur at the input of one or more slicers 210 in the Ethernet PHY 200. A signal 207_n output by an equalizer 206_n may be utilized to generate the one or more estimate signals 217₁-217_N. The Ethernet PHY 200 may receive a common mode signal 203 from a common mode sensor 326 coupled to one of the physical channels 106₁-106_N. The common mode signal 203 may be utilized to generate the one or more estimate signals 217₁ -217_N. A decision output 211_n of a slicer 210_n in the Ethernet PHY 200 may be subtracted from an output 207_n of an equalizer 206_n in the Ethernet PHY 200. A signal 245_n resulting from the subtraction may be utilized to generate the one or more estimate signals 217₁-217_N.

The one or more estimate signals 217₁-217_N may be generated utilizing a selected one of the following signals: (1) an equalizer output 207_n; (2) a signal 245_n resulting from a subtraction of a slicer decision output 211_n from the equalizer output 207_n; and (3) a signal 221 output by a common mode sense circuit 326 coupled to one of the physical channels 106₁-106_N. The selection may be based on a strength of the interference 104′₁-104′_N that may be present in the signals 207₁-207_N. The Ethernet PHY 200 may be operable to generate a pair of phase-quadrature signals 219₁ and 219₂ having a frequency that tracks a frequency of the interference 104′₁-104′_N. An adaptive filter 216_n in the Ethernet PHY 200 may utilize the phase-quadrature signals 219₁ and 219₂ to generate the one or more estimate signals 217₁ and 217₂. The estimate signal 217_n may be generated utilizing a selected one of a decision output 211_n of a slicer 210_n and an error output 213_n of the slicer 210_n. The selected one of the decision output 211 _n and the error output 213_n may be utilized by the adaptive filter 216_n to generate the estimate signal 217_n. The selection may be based on strength of the interference 104″_n present in the signal 209_n.

Other embodiments of the invention may provide a non-transitory computer readable medium and/or storage medium, and/or a non-transitory machine readable medium and/or storage medium, having stored thereon, a machine code and/or a computer program having at least one code section executable by a machine and/or a computer, thereby causing the machine and/or computer to perform the steps as described herein for adaptive tone cancellation for mitigating the effects of electromagnetic interference.

Accordingly, the present invention may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present invention may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computer system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software may be a general-purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein.

The present invention may also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which when loaded in a computer system is able to carry out these methods. Computer program in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.

While the present invention has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present invention without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the present invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for communications, the method comprising:

in an Ethernet PHY: receiving one or more signals via a corresponding one or more physical channels; generating a plurality of estimate signals, each of which approximates interference present in a corresponding one of the one or more received signals; generating, in the Ethernet PHY, a pair of phase-quadrature signals having a frequency that tracks a frequency of the interference, wherein one or more adaptive filters of the Ethernet PHY utilizes the generated pair of phase-quadrature signals for the generation of the plurality of estimate signals; and subtracting each one of the plurality of estimate signals from a corresponding one of the received one or more signals, wherein the subtracting occurs at an input of one or more slicers in the Ethernet PHY.

2. The method according to claim 1, comprising processing, in the Ethernet PHY, the one or more received signals via a corresponding one or more equalizers.

3. The method according to claim 1, comprising:

receiving, in the Ethernet PHY, a common mode signal from a common mode sensor coupled to one of the physical channels; and

generating the plurality of estimate signals utilizing the common mode signal.

4. The method according to claim 1, comprising:

processing, in the Ethernet PHY, the one or more received signals via a corresponding one or more equalizers;

subtracting, at an output of a corresponding one of the one or more equalizers, a decision output of one of the slicers in the Ethernet PHY from one of the one or more received signals; and

generating the plurality of estimate signals utilizing a signal resulting from the subtracting of the decision output.

5. The method according to claim 1, comprising generating the plurality of estimate signals utilizing one signal selected from signals comprising:

a signal output by an equalizer of the Ethernet PHY;

a signal resulting from a subtraction of a decision output of one of the slicers from the signal output by the equalizer; and

a signal output by a common mode sense circuit coupled to one of the physical channels.

6. The method according to claim 5, comprising selecting the signal based on a strength of the interference.

7. The method according to claim 1, comprising selecting, in the Ethernet PHY, one of a decision output of one of the slicers of the Ethernet PHY and an error output of the one of the slicers for the generation of the plurality of estimate signals.

8. The method according to claim 7, comprising selecting the one of the decision output and the error output based on a strength of the interference.

9. The method according to claim 7, wherein:

an adaptive filter of the Ethernet PHY utilizes the selected one of the decision output; and

the error output for the generation of the plurality of estimate signals.

10. A system for communications, the system comprising:

one or more circuits or processors for use in an Ethernet PHY, wherein the one or more circuits or processors comprise one or more slicers, one or more adaptive filters, and the one or more circuits or processors are operable to: receive one or more signals via a corresponding one or more physical channels; generate one or more estimate signals, each of which approximates interference present in a corresponding one of the received signals; generate a pair of phase-quadrature signals having a frequency that tracks a frequency of the interference; utilize the pair of phase-quadrature signals for the generation of the one or more estimate signals; and subtract each one of the estimate signals from a corresponding one of the received signals, wherein the subtracting occurs at an input of the one or more slicers.

11. The system according to claim 10, wherein:

the one or more circuits or processors comprise one or more equalizers; and

each of the one or more received signals is processed via a corresponding one of the one or more equalizers.

12. The system according to claim 10, wherein the one or more circuits or processors are operable to:

receive a common mode signal from a common mode sensor coupled to one of the physical channels; and

generate the one or more estimate signals utilizing the common mode signal.

13. The system according to claim 10, wherein:

the one or more circuits or processors comprise one or more equalizers and;

each of the one or more received signals is processed via a corresponding one of the one or more equalizers;

the one or more circuits or processors are operable to subtract, at an output of a corresponding one of the one or more equalizers, a decision output of one of the one or more slicers from one of the one or more received signals; and

the one or more circuits or processors are operable to generate the one or more estimate signals utilizing a signal resulting from the subtracting of the decision output.

14. The system according to claim 10, wherein:

the one or more circuits or processors comprise an equalizer and a common mode sense circuit; and

the one or more circuits or processors are operable to generate the one or more estimate signals utilizing one signal selected from signals comprising: a signal output by the equalizer of the Ethernet PHY, a signal resulting from a subtraction of a decision output of one of the one or more slicers from the signal output by the equalizer, and a signal output by the common mode sense circuit coupled to one of the physical channels.

15. The system according to claim 14, wherein the signal is selected based on a strength of the interference.

16. The system according to claim 10, wherein the one or more circuits or processors select one of a decision output of one of the one or more slicers and an error output of one of the one or more slicers for the generation the one or more estimate signals.

17. The system according to claim 16, wherein the one or more circuits or processors are operable to select the one of the decision output and the error output based on a strength of the interference.

18. The system according to claim 16, wherein:

the adaptive filter utilizes the selected one of the decision output; and

the error output for generating one of the one or more estimate signals.

19. A non-transitory computer readable medium having processor instructions for communications, that when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

generate a plurality of estimate signals, each of which approximates interference present in a corresponding one of one or more received signals on one or more physical channels;

generate a pair of phase-quadrature signals having a frequency that tracks a frequency of the interference, wherein one or more adaptive filters of the Ethernet PHY utilizes the generated pair of phase-quadrature signals for the generation of the plurality of estimate signals; and

subtract each one of the plurality of estimate signals from a corresponding one of the received one or more signals, wherein the subtracting occurs at an input of one or more slicers in the Ethernet PHY.

20. The computer readable medium of claim 19, the processor further caused to select one of a decision output of one of the one or more slicers and an error output of one of the one or more slicers for the generation the one or more estimate signals based on a strength of the interference.