Training System
A training system is provided. The training system may have a handheld computing device configured to receive a data input from an input device. The input device may be a sensor capable of measuring a condition relating to the training. An analysis module in electronic communication with the handheld computing device is configured to interpret the data input from the input device and configured provide a feedback output related to the execution of the goals of the training system. Based on this feedback, a trainee or trainer may adjust the training program to enhance the trained skills.
This application is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority from U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/368,876, filed on Feb. 8, 2012, which is currently pending.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the InventionThe present invention relates generally to a training system. More particularly, the present relates to a training system that utilizes input devices such as sensors in electronic communication with a computing device to track and record conditions—both of a local environment and a trainee.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONFor decades, the standard format of training shooters is one in which one or more students are taught by one or more instructors. New shooters are taught the theory of firearms and then are given practical instruction. Practical instruction includes being shown how to hold the weapon, sight the weapon and fire the weapon. Students are taught to hold their breath during the shot, to focus on the sights and to properly squeeze the trigger. An instructor walks up and down a shooting line behind the shooters observing what each shooter is doing correctly and incorrectly. The instructor then critiques the performance of each shooter.
Two problems make these techniques very inefficient. The first is that it is not possible for an instructor to watch all of the students all of the time. The second is that no matter how many times an instructor tells a student to hold his or her breath, or to squeeze the trigger, and even if the students believe that they are doing it, there is no simple way to confirm that they actually are. As such, these inefficiencies make training a shooter an expensive proposition in both money and time.
Therefore, what is needed is a system that may shorten the time needed to train a shooter, and that may minimize training, range, and ammunition costs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe subject matter of this application may involve, in some cases, interrelated products, alternative solutions to a particular problem, and/or a plurality of different uses of a single system or article.
In one aspect, a training system is provided. The training system may comprise a handheld computing device configured to receive a data input from an input device. The input device may be a sensor capable of measuring a condition relating to the training. An analysis module in electronic communication with the handheld computing device is configured to interpret the data input from the input device and configured provide a feedback output related to the execution of the goals of the training system. Based on this feedback, a trainee or trainer may adjust the training program to enhance the trained skills.
In another aspect, a method of firearm training is provided. The method initially comprises attaching a handheld computing device in mechanical communication with a firearm. A sensor is configured to measure a condition relating to the firearm training, the sensor being electronically connected to the handheld computing device. An analysis module interprets data from the sensor and provides a feedback output. The output may be displayed and analyzed, allowing a trainee to tailor their training based this feedback.
In yet another aspect, a method of firearm training is provided. The method initially comprises attaching a handheld computing device in mechanical communication with a firearm. The handheld computing device is in wireless communication with a personal computer. A sensor is configured to measure a condition relating to the firearm training and electronically connected to the personal computer. An analysis module interprets data from the sensor and provides a feedback output. The output may be displayed on a display of the personal computer, and analyzed, allowing a trainee to tailor their training based this feedback.
Computers and computing devices described herein, whether they are personal, mainframe, mobile, or the like, may comprise elements typically found on computing devices, including a memory, storage, processor, and potentially a display. In some embodiments, a non-transitory computer readable medium may be provided with instructions directing a computer to perform the methods and functions taught herein.
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of presently preferred embodiments of the invention and does not represent the only forms in which the present invention may be constructed and/or utilized. The description sets forth the functions and the sequence of steps for constructing and operating the invention in connection with the illustrated embodiments.
Generally, the present invention concerns a training system. In one embodiment, the present invention may be utilized for firearms training. However, the technology may be widely applied to, for example, aviation training, race car training, and the like.
In one embodiment, the present invention may generally comprise a handheld computing device in electronic communication with one or a plurality of input devices. The handheld computing device is configured such that the input devices may gather and measure information about a condition or conditions relating to the training. For example, input devices may gather information about conditions such as information about a trainee, and/or information about the external environment of the trainee. Further, an analysis module may be configured to interpret data gathered from the input devices to provide training feedback to a trainee to allow the trainee to improve based on the feedback.
The handheld computing device may be any mobile device capable of receiving inputs from input devices. In one embodiment, the handheld computing device may be a smartphone such as an iPhone®, Android® or the like. In another embodiment, the handheld computing device may be a personal digital assistant (PDA). In yet another embodiment, the handheld computing device may be a iPod® or similar handheld device. In still a further embodiment, the handheld computing device may be specifically designed and constructed to be used with the system of the present invention.
The input device or devices may be any device capable of sensing some element of an environment and providing input to the handheld computing device and/or an external computer. For example, input devices may be any devices capable of receiving conditions relating to the training including but not limited to, a camera, accelerometer, microphone, speaker, thermometer, pressure sensor, motion sensor, global positioning system, biometric sensor, sensors embedded within clothing and/or gear, and the like. The biometric sensor may be configured to measure particular attributes of a user's body, including but not limited to respiration rate, user motion, gyroscopic user motion, trigger finger movement, muscle movements in general, eye position and movement, heart rate (via ECG or other), body temperature, skin conductance/galvanic skin response (GSR), and the like.
In one embodiment, the handheld computing device may have a plurality of input devices built into it. For example, in one embodiment the handheld computing device may comprise a camera, accelerometer, microphone, speaker, global positioning system (GPS) and visual display. The handheld computing device may further have a plurality of input devices positioned externally from the device, and in electronic communication there with. For example, in one embodiment, biometric sensors may be positioned on a body of a trainee, and may communicate with the handheld communication device.
In another embodiment, the handheld computing device may be in electronic communication with a personal computer such as a laptop or desktop computer. In one embodiment, the handheld computing device may be in wireless electronic communication with the personal computer. In these embodiments, the handheld computing device transmits data gathered from the input device to the personal computer. The personal computer may then process the information from the input device and provide feedback to a trainee. The personal computer may also store data from different training sessions to track trainee progress and provide a database of training logs. In another embodiment, the personal computer may be a remote server accessible by the handheld computing device via the internet.
In an alternative embodiment, the external input devices may communicate directly with a personal computer, with which the handheld computing device is also in electronic communication. In this embodiment, input data may be processed by an analysis module of the personal computer.
The wireless communication contemplated herein between, for example, the biometric sensors and the handheld computing device, or the handheld computing device and a personal computer may be performed by any suitable wireless transmission protocol. Examples of wireless communication methods may include WiFi, Bluetooth, ZigBee, infrared, cellular, and the like. It should be understood that any wireless communication may be equally effective if performed using a wired electronic connection.
In one embodiment, the present invention may be configured as a system for firearms training. In this embodiment, the handheld computing device may be mounted in mechanical communication with a firearm. The term mechanical communication may refer to mounting of the handheld computing device directly on a firearm, on an arm of a user firing a firearm. The latter example allowing the handheld computing device to be indirectly mechanically connected to the firearm through the arm of the user, which in turn is holding the firearm, or in any manner providing direct connection to the firearm, or connection to a structure which is in turn eventually attached to the firearm.
In embodiments where the present invention is used for firearm training using rifles, shotguns or other shoulder-fired firearms, the handheld computing device may be attached to a barrel of the firearm. A rifle mount may be used for this attachment. The rifle mount may comprise a barrel attachment portion, an arm, extending from the barrel attachment portion, and a clip, the clip configured to secure the handheld computing device. Preferably, the clip may be positioned on an opposite side of the arm from the barrel attachment portion.
In a further embodiment, the rifle mount may involve the clip being rotatably mounted to the arm, such that the clip may pivot, allowing a handheld computing device secured in the clip to be pivoted to direct any devices to a correct sensing direction.
In embodiments where the present invention is used for firearm training using handguns, the handheld computing device may be attached to a wrist mount. In this embodiment, the wrist mount may have a band or other structure that may allow attachment to a wrist or forearm of a trainee. The wrist mount may further comprise a clip which is pivotally mounted to the band. The pivotal attachment of the clip to the band may allow a handheld computing device secured to the clip to be pivoted to the appropriate position. In a further embodiment, an arm may attach the clip to the band.
The handheld computing device and/or the personal computer may be configured to be in electronic communication with one or a plurality analysis modules that may allow receipt, interpretation and output of various data from the input devices. The analysis module or modules may be any computing device configured, via hardware or software to perform this receipt, interpretation, and output. In this manner, the system may allow for the automated output of training feedback by the system based on the data collected from the environment and trainee by the input devices.
The term “in electronic communication with” is intended herein to refer to direct electronic communication, as well as indirect electronic communication, such as between devices, communication through a network, and the like. The following examples of analysis modules are provided by way of non-limiting examples only.
A video analysis module may utilize a camera of the handheld computing device to record video during a training session. The video may be of any element of value for the training. For example, in an embodiment where the system is used for firearms training, the eye motion of a trainee may be recorded and tracked to train proper eye movement, proper eye opening and sighting. A video analysis module may further allow review of the recorded video. In one embodiment, an instructor may review the video and provide feedback to the trainee. In another embodiment, a computer may review the video and provide feedback based on programmed analysis.
A trigger pull analysis module may be utilized to analyze and provide feedback on trigger pull behavior. For example, conditions analyzed may be whether a trainee has held their breath during the trigger pull, or whether a trainee is squeezing the trigger or pulling the trigger.
In one embodiment, the trigger pull analysis module may provide analysis of input data based on the trigger sensor. In one embodiment, a trigger sensor may be attached to a trigger of a firearm, which can sense trigger movement. In another embodiment, the trigger sensor may be configured as an Electromyography (EMG) sensor which may record the electrical impulses of muscles pulling the trigger finger. If improper technique is used, it may be detected by unwanted movement of the trigger.
In one embodiment, the trigger pull analysis module may provide analysis of input data based not only on the trigger sensor, but also on an accelerometer of the handheld computing device. In this embodiment, a trigger sensor may be attached to a trigger of a firearm, which can sense trigger movement. If improper technique is used, it may be detected by unwanted movement of the trigger detectable by the trigger sensor, as well as excess firearm movement detectable by the accelerometer.
In another embodiment, the trigger pull analysis module may provided analysis of input data based on the trigger sensor, and a biometric sensor that tracks trainee respiration. In this embodiment, proper trigger technique may be analyzed because shooters are trained to hold their breath when firing. In this embodiment, respiration at the time of trigger fire can be analyzed, and a feedback may be provided if improper technique was used.
In another embodiment, a firearm movement analysis module may be utilized to track proper firearm motion using an accelerometer in communication with the handheld computing device. If excessive motion is detected, the module may provide feedback indicating that there was excess firearm motion during aiming and firing, and provide instructions to a trainee to remedy the problem. In a further embodiment, a side to side motion of the firearm may be tracked. This tracking by the firearm movement analysis module may be used to measure and discourage “sweeping” which is when a trainee excessively sweeps their firearm laterally, potentially putting other trainees or colleagues in danger.
Further, biometric sensors may be utilized to measure biologic functions of a user.
In another embodiment, a body movement analysis module may be utilized to track proper body movement using a biometric sensor that tracks trainee body movement. If excessive motion is detected, the module may provide feedback indicating that there was excess body motion during aiming and firing, and provide instructions to a trainee to remedy the problem.
An audio analysis module may be utilized to track audio from a shooting session. The audio module may be configured to record any type of audio for various uses. For example in one embodiment, the audio recording may be utilized to track respiration. In another embodiment, the audio may be used to analyze unusual sounds that may be occurring during the training. In another embodiment, the audio analysis module may be used to record firing times by recording the audio from firing the firearm.
A heart rate analysis module may be utilized to track and analyze heart rate of a trainee. In a further embodiment, this heart rate may be compared to other inputs. Heart rate may be tracked compared to other events that occur during training, such as firing, heat rate cycling, and the like.
A brainwave entrainment module may be provided to output specific audio patterns to reduce anxiety in the shooter. The brainwave entrainment module may receive inputs from sensors relating to an elevated anxiety level of a trainee, and provide audio output to seek to lower this anxiety. Some specific audio patterns may include binaural, monaural beats, and isochronic tones, among others. Inputs relating to an elevated anxiety level may include increased respiration and heart rate, excess sweating, shaking, muscle tension, and the like. These inputs may be measured by various sensors of the system. Alternatively, a trainer or trainee may activate the audio output manually.
It should be understood that various analysis modules may be utilized based on what input devices are utilized. Moreover, data from multiple input devices may be fed into an analysis module. For example, eye movement, firearm movement, trigger pull and respiration may all be incorporated into a single trigger pull analysis module to compare what a trainee's eye is focusing on during trigger pull (using a camera input device), if a trainee is properly holding their breath (using a respiration input device), and if a trainee is properly squeezing the trigger (using a trigger sensor, accelerometer, or the like). The module may then provide one or more outputs showing the data gathered. Optionally the particular module may provide analysis and feedback based on the data gathered. In one embodiment, the feedback may identify a training strength and provide positive feedback. In another embodiment, the feedback may identify a training deficiency, and may provide negative feedback and/or advice to address the training deficiency.
An example of feedback provided for the above noted embodiment may include a chart of trigger force over time, and a green, red or yellow signal to indicate good, bad, or medium execution of proper trigger pull.
Another example of feedback may be a chart indicating breathing rate over time coupled with a time marker for when the firearm was fired. The analysis provided may be a positive indicator if breathing was not detected at the time marker, or a negative indicator if breathing was detected at the time marker.
Further, the feedback may include providing advice such as text reminding the trainee to hold their breath while squeezing the trigger, thereby automatically addressing the training deficiency without an instructor looking over the trainee's shoulder.
Still another example may be a chart tracking eye movement over time with a time marker for when the firearm was fired. The analysis provided may be a positive indicator with proper eye movement, or lack thereof, and a negative indicator of excessive eye or improper movement.
In a further embodiment, each module may provide, as an output, a chart of the data analyzed compared to time, with a marker provided at each trigger pull. In this embodiment a trainer may review the output of all charts and provide feedback on his own. Alternatively, the modules may provide various outputs and feedbacks automatically. Feedbacks may include positive/negative markers, as well as text feedback providing tips and evaluation. Further still, a combination of the two embodiments may be employed, with some automatic feedback, coupled with review by an instructor.
The system may further comprise a computer memory in which the results provided by the analysis modules may be recorded. In later uses of the system, the recorded results may be accessed in the computer memory, and the previous results may be used to track progress, to identify recurring problems and problems that have been addressed. The system may further comprise a module to provide visual feedback tracking progress over time.
In some embodiments, some inputs may be manually provided by a trainee or instructor. For example, environmental conditions, location, firearm type, target distance, ammunition used, and the like may be suitable for manual input.
In other embodiments, the above noted inputs may be automatically retrieved. For example weather conditions could be accessed by an electronic communication between the system and a weather server, and firearm type could be scanned using a scanner connected to the system and a tag marked on the firearm.
In a further embodiment, a user interface of the system may be implemented on the handheld computing device, the personal computer, or both. The user interface may allow for multiple users to track multiple trainings under multiple conditions, allowing for a highly flexible, scalable implementation.
The user interface may begin with a login for a particular user in the event that a multi-user configuration is used. The login may access data stored relating to the logged in user. An administrator option may be provided that may allow access to any user and have a maximum amount of privileges that may be limited for other users.
Once logged in as a particular user, a series of data may be accessed. For example, a user may store data relating to multiple firearms. Access to a particular firearm may allow retrieval of training progress for a particular firearm, among other things.
In another embodiment, a user may store data relating to multiple optics such as scopes for the firearms. Access to a particular firearm may allow retrieval of training progress for that particular optic device, and the firearms they are used with, among other things.
Further still, a user may store data relating to multiple ammunitions. Access to a particular ammunition may allow retrieval of training progress for that particular ammunition, and the firearms it is used with, among other things.
The user interface may further comprise a series of calculators. The handheld computing device or personal computer may utilize these calculators to determine a number of ballistic related properties. Calculators may calculate, for example, elements such as bullet drop based on range and ammunition properties, target height, minute of angle, and bullet deceleration.
In one embodiment, the system may operate as follows: Initially, a user may access the user interface and select the proper conditions, gun, ammunition and the like. Next a session is initiated wherein the system is prepared to receive inputs from the various input devices. Depending on input devices used, there may be some calibration and integration required for each input device. A handheld computing device may be attached (directly or indirectly) to the firearm and configured to gather data from its on-board input devices. Any external input devices may be attached to their appropriate positions and electronically connected to the system. Once all input devices are configured and set to gather data, the firearm training may begin.
During training, the trainee may fire the weapon. During, and optionally before and after this firing, the system receives data from the various input devices. The system may use analysis modules to analyze the data either as it is received, or the data may be stored for review by the modules after the session is completed. Moreover, the analysis modules may provide feedback based on the data gathered, allowing the user and/or a trainer to interpret the feedback and make adjustments based on the feedback. This may be performed on the fly after each shot is fired, or may be performed in a batch after a training session, or after a plurality of shots. The feedback, as discussed above, may comprise charts, indicators, text, audio feedback and the like.
After the session has concluded, the system may provide a summary. Further the system may save the data gathered from the input devices, as well as the interpreted data and outputs from the analysis module(s) to a computer memory.
A similar system as described above could be utilized for racecar training. In this embodiment, sensors could be configured to sense vehicle features such as wheel turn position, throttle, brake, engine RPM, fuel, engine temperature, cabin temperature, and the like. Further, sensors could monitor driver conditions, such as eye tracking, body temperature, respiration, heart rate, in car audio and video, and the like. Analysis modules could be in communication with the sensors, and a computer (either handheld, personal or server) and a display may provide feedback output provided by the analysis modules. As such, the system of this embodiment may allow feedback to be provided to the racecar trainee based on the sensed and analyzed information.
Further, a similar system as described above could be utilized for aviation training. In this embodiment, sensors could be configured to sense aircraft features such as flap position, throttle, altitude, engine RPM, fuel, engine temperature, cabin pressure and temperature, and the like. Further, sensors could monitor aviator conditions, such as eye tracking, body temperature, respiration, heart rate, cabin audio and video, and the like. Analysis modules could be in communication with the sensors, and a computer (either handheld, personal or server), a display could provide feedback output provided by the analysis modules. As such, the system of this embodiment may allow feedback to be provided to the aviation trainee based on the sensed and analyzed information.
In another embodiment, a similar system as described above could be utilized for explosive disposal training, including disposal of improvised explosive devices (IED). In this embodiment, sensors could be utilized to sense operator features, bomb suit features, and environmental conditions such as body temperature, heart rate, eye tracking, respiration, bomb suit temperature, external and internal video and audio, disposal time, proper disposal technique, proper disposal step order and procedure while maintaining a clam demeanor, and the like. Analysis modules could be in communication with the sensors and a computer (either handheld, personal or server). A display could provide feedback output provided by the analysis modules. As such, the system of this embodiment may allow feedback to be provided to the explosive disposal trainee based on the sensed and analyzed information. In some embodiments, trainee progress may be tracked over time to measure bodily and other responses of a trainee under certain conditions.
In yet another embodiment, a similar system as described above could be used in anger management training. In this embodiment, sensors could be utilized to sense user bodily conditions to provide feedback to a user that they are experiencing anger related body responses. Bodily conditions may include body temperature, heart rate, eye tracking, respiration, blood pressure, and the like. Further, sensors could be utilized to sense external conditions that may trigger anger responses to record body reaction to various stimuli. For example, external video and audio may record unusual conditions, particularly when anger related body responses are sensed. Analysis modules could be in communication with the sensors and a computer (either handheld, personal or server). A display could provide feedback output provided by the analysis modules. As such, the system of this embodiment may allow feedback to be provided to the anger management trainee based on the sensed and analyzed information. Moreover, a trainee's biometric response to different situations may be recorded. As training continues, progress may be tracked to measure decreased anger related body responses over time.
It should be understood that the system may be utilized for various training systems where sensors may be used to analyze training progress, where feedback can be provided based on the analysis, and where a trainee or trainer may act on the feedback provided to enhance their training.
In further embodiments, a computerized assessment engine may gather all data such as feedback output from the computerized analysis modules, the assessment engine being configured to draw conclusions based on the recorded and processed data. The assessment engine may then provide computerized conclusions to a user in real time or shortly thereafter. These conclusions may be in the form of instructions, suggestions, pointers, ways to improve the training, specific weaknesses and strengths, and other similar training conclusions that may be drawn based on the data gathered during the training. This may be an alternative to the data gathering and analysis of the previous embodiments, because instead of (or in addition to) the feedback being displayed for conclusions to be drawn by a human trainer and/or trainee, a computer itself can draw these conclusions and provide feedback during the training exercise, instead of after the training has completed.
In one embodiment, the conclusions drawn by the assessment engine during a session can be gathered and formatted into a situation report. This report can be sent back to the trainee so that the trainee can take appropriate action. This may be particularly useful for in-training feedback so that a trainee—particularly a firearms trainee-can adjust and practice proper technique quickly and during the same session. The situational report can be in the form of visual and/or audio media feedback.
In a further embodiment, the situational report and other conclusions or outputs from the assessment engine can be provided to a trainee through Google Glass® or a similar personal audio or visual display. Other embodiments of providing the situational report could be a feedback through an audio headset, or visual feedback through a personalized display screen on a user's firearm, helmet, or otherwise mounted to the user's body or accessory.
Generally the assessment engine is configured to utilize the output from the analysis module to generate conclusions of the trainee's progress, strengths, successes, and failures or weaknesses, and provide these to the trainee. The assessment engine may be based on any of a rules engine, a set of neural networks, a set of algorithms, or any combination thereof.
In some embodiments, this feedback can be provided in real time or nearly real time as the trainee is training. For example, if a trainee is progressing through a firearms training course, the feedback could be provided after each firing of the weapon, and may develop further with each firing, allowing the trainee to take appropriate action and to indicate that the trainee is improving, continuing to make the same mistakes, fixing prior mistakes but making new ones, and the like.
Specifically, one embodiment of the data flow of embodiments utilizing the assessment engine is as follows: a shooter is located at a shooting range. The sensors contemplated herein are connected to the user and/or the firearm and configured to record data. This data may be stored and processed by a computing device, and an analysis module may interpret the data and provide a feedback output. Based on this feedback output, the assessment engine may draw conclusions, and then present these conclusions to the user, potentially along with desirable corrective measures.
In further embodiments, Google Glass® or similar personalized device may be configured to direct a camera in the direction that the trainee is looking, to collect visual information down range in the direction of firing the firearm. This may be used in conjunction with visual data being gathered of the trainee such as eye tracking, facial indicators, and the like.
Turning now to
While several variations of the present invention have been illustrated by way of example in preferred or particular embodiments, it is apparent that further embodiments could be developed within the spirit and scope of the present invention, or the inventive concept thereof. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present invention, and are inclusive, but not limited to the following appended claims as set forth.
Claims
1-20. (canceled)
21. A training system comprising:
- a computing device configured to receive a data input from an input device, wherein the input device is a sensor capable of measuring a condition relating to a training;
- an analysis module in electronic communication with the computing device, the analysis module configured to interpret the data input from the input device, the analysis module configured to provide a feedback output related to execution of a goal of the training system;
- a firearm, the computing device being in mechanical communication with the firearm; and
- wherein the training system is configured as a firearm training system.
22. The training system of claim 21 wherein the input device is a sweep detector attached to the firearm, the sweep detector configured to measure improper side to side movement of the firearm.
23. The training system of claim 21 further comprising a computerized assessment engine in communication with the feedback output of the analysis module, the computerized assessment engine configured to process the feedback output of the analysis module.
24. The training system of claim 23 wherein the computerized assessment engine is configured to provide a plurality of conclusions formatted into a situation report.
25. The training system of claim 24 wherein the system further comprises at least one of an audio or visual feedback device is further configured to provide a training instruction based on at least one of the plurality of conclusions.
26. The training system of claim 25 wherein the training instruction is provided in real time during training.
27. The training system of claim 21 further comprising a second input device comprising a camera directed to a direction of fire of the firearm, the second input device in electronic communication with the computing device.
28. The training system of claim 21 wherein the input device is configured to measure a respiration of a user.
29. The training system of claim 21 wherein the input device is at least one of a camera, an accelerometer, a microphone, a sensor tracking respiration, a sensor tracking heart rate, a sensor tracking body movement, a trigger sensor, a weather sensor, a sensor tracking eye movement, a sensor tracking firearm movement, and a weather sensor.
30. The training system of claim 21 further comprising a plurality of input devices each in communication with the computing device.
31. The training system of claim 30 further comprising a plurality of analysis modules in electronic communication with the computing device, each of the plurality of analysis modules configured to interpret the data input from at least one of the plurality of input devices, each of the plurality of analysis modules configured to provide a feedback output based on the data input, the feedback output related to execution of the goal of the training system.
32. A training system comprising:
- a computing device configured to receive a data input from an input device, wherein the input device is a sensor capable of measuring a condition relating to a training;
- an analysis module in electronic communication with the computing device, the analysis module configured to interpret the data input from the input device, the analysis module configured provide a feedback output related to execution of a goal of the training system;
- a firearm, the computing device being in mechanical communication with the firearm;
- wherein the training system is configured as a firearm training system; and
- wherein the input device is a motion sensor configured to measure a motion of the firearm; and wherein the analysis module is configured to provided a feedback output related to a movement of the firearm during training.
33. The training system of claim 32 wherein the goal of the training system is to eliminate side to side sweeping of the firearm, and wherein the feedback output is an output indicating an extend of sweeping of the firearm.
34. The training system of claim 33 further comprising a computerized assessment engine in communication with the feedback output of the analysis module, the computerized assessment engine configured to process the feedback output of the analysis module, the assessment engine providing an output informing a user that the side to side sweeping is excessive.
35. A training system comprising:
- a computing device configured to receive a data input from an input device, wherein the input device is a sensor capable of measuring a condition relating to a training;
- an analysis module in electronic communication with the computing device, the analysis module configured to interpret the data input from the input device, the analysis module configured to provide a feedback output related to execution of a goal of the training system;
- a computerized assessment engine in communication with the feedback output of the analysis module, the computerized assessment engine configured to process the feedback output of the analysis module;
- a firearm, the computing device being in mechanical communication with the firearm; and
- wherein the training system is configured as a firearm training system.
36. The training system of claim 35 wherein the computerized assessment engine is configured to provide a plurality of conclusions formatted into a situation report.
37. The training system of claim 36 wherein the system further comprises at least one of an audio or visual feedback device is further configured to provide a training instruction based on at least one of the plurality of conclusions.
38. The training system of claim 37 wherein the training instruction is provided in real time during training.
39. The training system of claim 35 wherein the computerized assessment module provides a conclusion to a system user on a personalized display.
40. The training system of claim 35 wherein the computerized assessment module provides a conclusion to a system user on an audio headset.
Type: Application
Filed: Feb 10, 2014
Publication Date: Jun 5, 2014
Inventor: Troy Nolen (Windham, NH)
Application Number: 14/176,847
